Male-biased sexual selection persists across contrasting habitats in a dioecious plant

preprint OA: closed CC-BY-4.0
📄 Open PDF Full text JSON View at publisher
Full text 1,596 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
Abstract In most angiosperms, pollinators mediate access to sexual partners, making attractive floral traits key targets of sexual selection. Theory predicts stronger selection through the male function, due to greater dependence of male reproductive success on mate acquisition. However, habitat degradation may alter plant–pollinator interactions and disrupt sex-specific selection. In particular, reduced pollinator density may increase the dependency of female reproductive success on mate acquisition and strengthen selection on floral traits in both sexes. We tested this hypothesis in the dioecious species Silene dioica by measuring pollinator visitation, pollination service, and phenotypic selection on floral traits in both sexes across six populations located in either forest or anthropogenic habitats. Despite lower visitation in anthropogenic sites, pollination service was comparable between habitats with consistent selection on fertility-related traits in females. In contrast, we found stronger selection on a male trait likely promoting efficient pollen transfer in anthropogenic habitats, indicating a sex-specific response to land use change. Finally, male—but not female—reproductive success increased with the number of sexual partners in both habitats, supporting stronger sexual selection in males. More broadly, our results emphasize the need for a sex-specific perspective on floral trait evolution and demonstrate the persistence of male-biased sexual selection under environmental change. Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2026) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-05-23T02:00:01.238055+00:00
License: CC-BY-4.0