A generalized scaling law reveals synchrony-driven reorganization of brain dynamics across the human lifespan

preprint OA: closed CC-BY-NC-4.0
Full text 2,048 characters · extracted from oa-html · click to expand
Abstract Complex ecological systems obey universal scaling laws such as Taylor’s law, which links population variance to the sample mean. Whether other complex systems with integrated and segregated functional networks—such as the human brain—follow analogous scaling laws, and how these laws behave under synchronized activity, remains unknown. Progress has been hindered because neural signals at all measurement scales contain both positive and negative values, whereas Taylor’s law was developed for non-negative ecological data. Here we introduce a generalized spatial scaling law that replaces the sample mean with the root-mean-square (RMS) of detrended activity, extending Taylor-like scaling to signed multivariate time series in neural and other complex systems. Within this framework, we quantify synchrony using a dedicated metric of functional coordination and show analytically, and via numerical simulations using multivariate Poisson, binomial, uniform and gamma distributions, that the scaling exponent is inversely related to synchrony. Applying this approach to human fMRI data from three large lifespan cohorts (N = 840, ages 18–88) reveals distinct age-related trajectories of the scaling exponent, with healthy aging characterized by a substantial synchrony-induced reduction in the exponent. The synchrony–scaling relationship remains stable during resting-state activity but progressively shifts during naturalistic tasks across the lifespan, and is particularly strong in limbic, subcortical, and cerebellar subnetworks, indicating preservation at subnetwork levels. Finally, individuals with ADHD exhibit disrupted synchrony–scaling coupling, highlighting the potential clinical and translational utility of this generalized scaling metric. Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest. Footnotes This version of the manuscript has undergone substantial revision. The title, abstract, introduction, results, and discussion sections have all been updated relative to the previous submission.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-html

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2026) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-05-23T02:00:01.238055+00:00
License: CC-BY-NC-4.0