[Ureterectomy in the treatment of urothelial carcinoma of the distal ureter]

review OA: closed public-domain-us
View on PubMed View at publisher
⚙ AI-generated summary by gemini-2.5-flash-lite, 2026-08-04 ⓘ

This study describes laparoscopic distal ureterectomy with reimplantation as a feasible treatment for low-grade urothelial carcinoma of the distal ureter, showing no recurrence in two patients.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Segmental ureterectomy with preservation of the kidney is a treatment option for the low grade urothelial carcinoma (LG-UC) in distal ureter that is not a candidate for endoscopic resection. Laparoscopic distal ureterectomy (LDU) with ureteral reimplantation is common in benign conditions (stenosis, iatrogenic lesion, endometriosis). However, it has been hardly described in malignant ureteral condition. The literature is reviewed in this regards and the surgical technique described. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The experience regarding two cases of LDU due to low grade urothelial carcinoma in distal ureter is presented. In both, previous bladder transurethral resection (RTU) was performed. The urinary cytology was negative and the imaging studies identified urinary obstruction and distal ureter filling defect. One of the patients had a background of T1G3 bladder cancer and suffered renal failure. In both, the ureter was ligated early. Segmental ureterectomy was performed using a combined endoscopic and laparoscopic procedure with ureteral desinsertion in one case. In the other, it was exclusively laparoscopic. Both were done with 4 trocars. Ureteral reimplantation was conducted with continuous hermetic suture and without tension. In one case with background of high grade bladder tumor, pelvic lymphadenectomy was also performed. RESULTS: Operating time was 180 and 240 min, respectively, with estimated bleeding of 100 and 250 ml. Hospitalization time was 6 and 4 days. The only post-operatory complication was paralytic ileum (Clavien I) in the first case. With a 20 and 12 month follow-up, there is no evidence of recurrence or dilatation. In the patient with renal failure, creatinine clearance improved. CONCLUSIONS: The LDU with ureteral reimplantation is a complex technique. However, it represents a feasible and effective alternative for the treatment of LG-UC in distal ureter, as long as the oncological and reconstructive principles are respected.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Condition tags

endometriosis

MeSH descriptors

Carcinoma, Transitional Cell Laparoscopy Ureter Ureteral Neoplasms Carcinoma, Transitional Cell Humans Ureter Ureteral Neoplasms Urologic Surgical Procedures Urologic Surgical Procedures

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-09-25T06:10:54.854274+00:00
pubmed
last seen: 2026-05-13T22:19:12.052662+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-09-25T06:33:09.130943+00:00
License: public-domain-us · commercial use OK · attribution required
Courtesy of the U.S. National Library of Medicine