Does age influence surgical technique in bowel endometriosis? A multicenter analysis of 1547 cases

other OA: closed public-domain-us
Full text JSON View on PubMed View at publisher
AI-generated summary by gemini-2.5-flash-lite, 2026-08-05

This multicenter analysis found that patient age did not influence surgical technique or complication severity for bowel endometriosis, but younger patients were more likely to have specimen extracted via Pfannenstiel incision.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

AI-generated deep summary by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-24 · read from full text

This retrospective multicenter observational study evaluated 1,547 patients undergoing surgery for bowel endometriosis (2016–2025) in tertiary referral hospitals in São Paulo, Brazil, analyzing whether age affected surgical technique (shaving, discoid nodulectomy, or segmental resection) and specimen extraction route (Pfannenstiel incision vs NOSE), along with complications graded by Clavien-Dindo. Conservative techniques predominated (shaving 62.4%), and there was no statistically significant association between age and surgical technique or severe complication rates (grade ≥ III in 1.9%). The abdominal extraction route was more commonly used in patients under 35 years (OR 1.42; p = 0.01), which the authors attribute to higher uterine preservation rates in younger patients. The paper explicitly notes no new datasets were generated or analyzed, reflecting its reliance on retrospective records. This paper is centrally about endometriosis — specifically, how patient age relates to operative technique and specimen extraction approaches in bowel endometriosis surgery.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

To evaluate whether patient age influences the complexity of the surgical approach for bowel endometriosis, including the technique performed and the route of specimen extraction. Methods: Retrospective, multicenter observational study, set in tertiary referral hospitals in the state of São Paulo, Brazil. A total of 1,547 patients who underwent surgery for bowel endometriosis between 2016 and 2025. Interventions: Surgical management of bowel endometriosis using one of three techniques: shaving, discoid nodulectomy, or segmental resection. Specimen extraction was performed via Pfannenstiel incision or natural orifice specimen extraction (NOSE). Results: Clinical variables, surgical technique, specimen extraction route, complications (classified by Clavien-Dindo), and associated procedures were analyzed. The mean age was 37.8 years. Conservative techniques were more frequent, with shaving performed in 62.4% of cases. No statistically significant association was found between age and surgical technique (p > 0.05). Severe complications (grade ≥ III) occurred in 1.9% of cases, with no significant difference between age groups. The abdominal extraction route (Pfannenstiel incision) was more commonly used in patients under 35 years (OR 1.42; p = 0.01). Conclusion: Age did not influence the choice of surgical technique or the severity of complications but was associated with the route of specimen extraction, likely due to a higher rate of uterine preservation in younger patients.
Full text 11,406 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · 2 sections · click to expand

Abstract

Objective To evaluate whether patient age influences the complexity of the surgical approach for bowel endometriosis, including the technique performed and the route of specimen extraction. Methods: Retrospective, multicenter observational study, set in tertiary referral hospitals in the state of São Paulo, Brazil. A total of 1,547 patients who underwent surgery for bowel endometriosis between 2016 and 2025. Interventions: Surgical management of bowel endometriosis using one of three techniques: shaving, discoid nodulectomy, or segmental resection. Specimen extraction was performed via Pfannenstiel incision or natural orifice specimen extraction (NOSE). Results: Clinical variables, surgical technique, specimen extraction route, complications (classified by Clavien-Dindo), and associated procedures were analyzed. The mean age was 37.8 years. Conservative techniques were more frequent, with shaving performed in 62.4% of cases. No statistically significant association was found between age and surgical technique (p > 0.05). Severe complications (grade ≥ III) occurred in 1.9% of cases, with no significant difference between age groups. The abdominal extraction route (Pfannenstiel incision) was more commonly used in patients under 35 years (OR 1.42; p = 0.01). Conclusion: Age did not influence the choice of surgical technique or the severity of complications but was associated with the route of specimen extraction, likely due to a higher rate of uterine preservation in younger patients. Similar content being viewed by others Data availability No datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.

References

Zondervan KT, Becker CM, Missmer SA (2020) Endometriosis. N Engl J Med 382(13):1244–1256. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMra1810764 Vercellini P, Viganò P, Somigliana E, Fedele L (2014) Endometriosis: pathogenesis and treatment. Nat Rev Endocrinol 10(5):261–275. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrendo.2013.255 Nnoaham KE, Hummelshoj L, Webster P, d’Hooghe T, de Cicco Nardone F, de Cicco Nardone C, Jenkinson C, Kennedy SH, Zondervan KT, World Endometriosis Research Foundation Global Study of Women’s Health consortium (2011) Impact of endometriosis on quality of life and work productivity: a multicenter study across ten countries. Fertil Steril 96(2):366-373.e8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2011.05.090 Kvaskoff M, Mu F, Terry KL, Harris HR, Poole EM, Farland L, Missmer SA (2015) Endometriosis: a high-risk population for major chronic diseases? Hum Reprod Update 21(4):500–516. https://doi.org/10.1093/humupd/dmv013 Chapron C, Marcellin L, Borghese B, Santulli P (2019) Rethinking mechanisms, diagnosis and management of endometriosis. Nat Rev Endocrinol 15(11):666–682. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41574-019-0245-z Khan KN, Kitajima M, Hiraki K, Fujishita A, Sekine I, Ishimaru T, Masuzaki H (2008) Immunopathogenesis of pelvic endometriosis: role of hepatocyte growth factor, macrophages and ovarian steroids. Am J Reprod Immunol 60(5):383–404. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0897.2008.00643.x. (PMID: 19238747) Roman H, Bubenheim M, Huet E, Bridoux V, Zacharopoulou C, Daraï E, Collinet P, Tuech JJ (2018) Conservative surgery versus colorectal resection in deep endometriosis infiltrating the rectum: a randomized trial. Hum Reprod 33(1):47–57. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/dex336 Ceccaroni M, Clarizia R, Roviglione G (2020) Nerve-sparing surgery for deep infiltrating endometriosis: laparoscopic eradication of deep infiltrating endometriosis with rectal and parametrial resection according to the Negrar method. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 27(2):263–264. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmig.2019.09.002 Meuleman C, Tomassetti C, D’Hoore A, Van Cleynenbreugel B, Penninckx F, Vergote I, D’Hooghe T (2011) Surgical treatment of deeply infiltrating endometriosis with colorectal involvement. Hum Reprod Update 17(3):311–326. https://doi.org/10.1093/humupd/dmq057 Clavien PA, Barkun J, de Oliveira ML, Vauthey JN, Dindo D, Schulick RD, de Santibañes E, Pekolj J, Slankamenac K, Bassi C, Graf R, Vonlanthen R, Padbury R, Cameron JL, Makuuchi M (2009) The clavien-dindo classification of surgical complications: five-year experience. Ann Surg 250(2):187–196. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181b13ca2 Bendifallah S, Puchar A, Vesale E, Moawad G, Daraï E, Roman H (2021) Surgical outcomes after colorectal surgery for endometriosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 28(3):453–466. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmig.2020.08.015 Popoutchi P, Marques Junior OW, Averbach P, Cardoso Filho CAM, Averbach M (2021) Surgical techniques for the treatment of rectal endometriosis: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials and observational studies. Arq Gastroenterol 58(4):548–559. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0004-2803.202100000-97 Collinet P, Leguevaque P, Neme RM, Cela V, Barton-Smith P, Hébert T, Hanssens S, Nishi H, Nisolle M (2014) Robot-assisted laparoscopy for deep infiltrating endometriosis: international multicentric retrospective study. Surg Endosc 28(8):2474–2479. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-014-3480-3 Becker CM, Bokor A, Heikinheimo O, Horne AW, Jansen F, Kiesel L et al (2022) ESHRE guideline: endometriosis. Hum Reprod Open 2022(2):hoac009. https://doi.org/10.1093/hropen/hoac009 Lin J, Lin S, Chen Z, Zheng B, Lin Y, Zheng Y, Liu Y, Chen SQ (2021) Meta-analysis of natural orifice specimen extraction versus conventional laparoscopy for colorectal cancer. Langenbecks Arch Surg 406(2):283–299. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-020-01934-8 Riiskjær M, Forman A, Kesmodel US, Andersen LM, Ljungmann K, Seyer-Hansen M (2018) Pelvic pain and quality of life before and after laparoscopic bowel resection for rectosigmoid endometriosis: a prospective, observational study. Dis Colon Rectum 61(2):221–229. https://doi.org/10.1097/DCR.0000000000000970 Roman H, Abo C, Huet E, Tuech JJ (2016) Deep shaving and transanal disc excision in large endometriosis of mid and lower rectum: the Rouen technique. Surg Endosc 30(6):2626–2627. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-015-4528-8 Roman H, Bridoux V, Merlot B, Resch B, Chati R, Coget J, Forestier D, Tuech JJ (2020) Risk of bowel fistula following surgical management of deep endometriosis of the rectosigmoid: a series of 1102 cases. Hum Reprod 35(7):1601–1611. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/deaa131 Bonin E, Bridoux V, Chati R, Kermiche S, Coget J, Tuech JJ, Roman H (2019) Diverting stoma-related complications following colorectal endometriosis surgery: a 163-patient cohort. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 232:46–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2018.11.008. (Epub 2018 Nov 6 PMID: 30468983) Meuleman C, Tomassetti C, Wolthuis A, Van Cleynenbreugel B, Laenen A, Penninckx F, Vergote I, DʼHoore A, DʼHooghe T (2014) Clinical outcome after radical excision of moderate-severe endometriosis with or without bowel resection and reanastomosis: a prospective cohort study. Ann Surg 259(3):522–531. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0b013e31828dfc5c Papatheodorou A, Vanderzwalmen P, Panagiotidis Y, Petousis S, Gullo G, Kasapi E, Goudakou M, Prapas N, Zikopoulos K, Georgiou I, Prapas Y (2016) How does closed system vitrification of human oocytes affect the clinical outcome? A prospective, observational, cohort, noninferiority trial in an oocyte donation program. Fertil Steril 106(6):1348–1355. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2016.07.1066 Habib N, Buzzaccarini G, Centini G, Moawad GN, Ceccaldi PF, Gitas G, Alkatout I, Gullo G, Terzic S, Sleiman Z (2022) Impact of lifestyle and diet on endometriosis: a fresh look to a busy corner. Prz Menopauzalny 21(2):124–132. https://doi.org/10.5114/pm.2022.116437 Alonzo L, Cannella R, Gullo G, Piombo G, Cicero G, Lopez A, Billone V, Andrisani A, Cucinella G, Lo Casto A, Lo Re G (2024) Magnetic resonance imaging of endometriosis: the role of advanced techniques. J Clin Med 13(19):5783. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13195783 Pugliesi RA, Triscari Barberi M, Roccella G, Gullo G, Billone V, Chitoran E, Cucinella G, Vernuccio F, Cannella R, Lo Re G (2025) MR defecography improves diagnosis of postoperative pelvic floor dysfunction after gynecological surgery. Diagnostics 15(13):1625. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics15131625 Pasta V, Gullo G, Giuliani A, Harrath AH, Alwasel SH, Tartaglia F, Cucina A, Bizzarri M (2015) An association of boswellia, betaine and myo-inositol (Eumastós) in the treatment of mammographic breast density: a randomized, double-blind study. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci 19(22):4419–4426 (PMID: 26636532) Gullo G, Carlomagno G, Unfer V, D’Anna R (2015) Myo-inositol: from induction of ovulation to menopausal disorder management. Minerva Ginecol 67(5):485–486 (PMID: 26491827) D’Anna R, Santamaria A, Giorgianni G, Vaiarelli A, Gullo G, Di Bari F, Benvenga S (2017) Myo-inositol and melatonin in the menopausal transition. Gynecol Endocrinol 33(4):279–282. https://doi.org/10.1080/09513590.2016.1254613. (Epub 2016 Dec 2 PMID: 27910708) Menichini D, Forte G, Orrù B, Gullo G, Unfer V, Facchinetti F (2022) The role of vitamin D in metabolic and reproductive disturbances of polycystic ovary syndrome: a narrative mini-review. Int J Vitam Nutr Res 92(2):126–133. https://doi.org/10.1024/0300-9831/a000691 Funding Does not apply. Author information Authors and Affiliations Contributions R Barretto: Data collection and patient recruitment RC Mariano da Silva: Data collection and chart review RP Gonçalves Filho: Data collection and critical review of the manuscript MM Sonnenfeld: Writing of the manuscript, statistical analysis, and figure/table preparation GJ Saba: Data collection and clinical supervision CRR Talaga: Data collection and literature review M Wajman: Data collection and database organization T Moscovitz: Study design, methodological supervision, and text revision CA Ortiz: Data collection and manuscript editing FB Manchini: Data collection and image review AG Manchini: Data collection and discussion input N Rostey: Data collection and clinical case analysis B Mirandola Bulisani: Data collection and formatting support LGL Gomes: Data collection and text formatting MR Rodrigues: Data collection M Ströher: Data collection and patient follow-up M Tcherniakovsky: Scientific supervision, study design, and critical manuscript review LCB do Carmo: Data collection and support in institutional logistics. Corresponding author Ethics declarations Conflict of interest The authors declare no competing interests. Additional information Publisher's Note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. Supplementary Information Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material. Rights and permissions Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law. About this article Cite this article Barretto, R., da Silva, R.C.M., Filho, R.P.G. et al. Does age influence surgical technique in bowel endometriosis? A multicenter analysis of 1547 cases. J Robotic Surg 19, 665 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-025-02861-w Received: Accepted: Published: Version of record: DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-025-02861-w

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Condition tags

endometriosisbowel_endometriosis

MeSH descriptors

Digestive System Surgical Procedures Digestive System Surgical Procedures Digestive System Surgical Procedures Digestive System Surgical Procedures Digestive System Surgical Procedures Digestive System Surgical Procedures Digestive System Surgical Procedures Digestive System Surgical Procedures Digestive System Surgical Procedures Digestive System Surgical Procedures Digestive System Surgical Procedures Digestive System Surgical Procedures Digestive System Surgical Procedures Digestive System Surgical Procedures Digestive System Surgical Procedures Digestive System Surgical Procedures Digestive System Surgical Procedures Digestive System Surgical Procedures Digestive System Surgical Procedures Digestive System Surgical Procedures

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-09-04T06:17:57.233406+00:00
pubmed
last seen: 2026-09-04T06:13:09.978255+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-09-04T06:34:25.427880+00:00
License: public-domain-us · commercial use OK · attribution required
Courtesy of the U.S. National Library of Medicine