Primary Peritoneal Serous Carcinoma Detected by Abnormal Cervical Smear: a Case Report
This case report details a 59-year-old woman whose primary peritoneal serous carcinoma was discovered through an abnormal cervical smear, despite a prior bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy.
One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works
This paper reports a rare case of primary peritoneal serous carcinoma (PPSC) that was detected after an abnormal routine Pap smear showed nuclear atypia of glandular cells in a 59-year-old asymptomatic woman. Endocervical and endometrial curettage initially showed an adenocarcinoma with focal squamous differentiation, and abdominal MRI demonstrated omental multinodularity and ascites with a thin endometrium, but subsequent laparotomy and extensive histology found no uterine disease and instead extensive omental infiltration consistent with PPSC, with microscopic cervical surface involvement and malignant cells in pelvic washings; the patient’s ovaries and fallopian tubes were absent at diagnosis due to prior bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy for endometriosis. The authors note the diagnostic challenge because PPSC can mimic ovarian serous carcinoma clinically and immunohistochemically, relying on specific criteria and negative markers to exclude alternatives such as mesothelioma. Relevance to endometriosis: the patient had a history of bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy for endometriosis and the case discusses PPSC developing after prophylactic removal of ovaries/tubes, explicitly linking endometriosis history to the report of PPSC detected by Pap smear.
Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works
Full text
17,326 characters
· extracted from
oa-pdf
· 5 sections
· click to expand
Abstract
Keywords
Introduction
Discussion
References
Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works
Condition tags
MeSH descriptors
Citation neighborhood (no data yet)
We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.
Source provenance
- europepmc
- last seen: 2026-08-13T06:15:24.848197+00:00
- pubmed
- last seen: 2026-05-13T22:22:05.164793+00:00
- unpaywall
- last seen: 2026-05-14T19:30:52.867331+00:00
Courtesy of the U.S. National Library of Medicine