Heightened Distraction under Competition in Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder

preprint OA: closed CC-BY-4.0
Full text 1,815 characters · extracted from oa-html · click to expand
Abstract The present study examine the extent to which attentional resources are allocated toward distracting affective and disorder-relevant pictures under task-relevant competition in participants with obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD; N = 33) and controls (N = 31). Competition between cues was examined using a foreground task where participants detected coherent motion in a flickering random dot kinematogram (RDK) overlaid on pictures ranging in emotional content (pleasant, neutral, unpleasant, and OCD-evoking pictures). Steady-state visual evoked potentials (ssVEPs) were measured in response to the flickering RDK and served as an index of visuocortical engagement with task-relevant cues. Data were also fitted to the distraction under competition model (DUC), a computational framework of attention selection. Group differences emerged with stronger visuocortical distraction (attenuated task engagement) in the OCD group, driven largely by the unpleasant pictures, followed by the OCD-evoking and pleasant pictures. Furthermore, the DUC model fit well in both groups and supported the results of the univariate analysis, demonstrating the magnitude of the visuocortical distraction observed in response to the unpleasant pictures, and the presence of substantial distraction in response to the OCD-evoking pictures in the OCD group. The present findings provide visuocortical evidence of heightened distraction in response to unpleasant and OCD-evoking pictures under task-relevant competition in OCD. Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest. Footnotes We have refined the Introduction and Discussion text, and supported our findings with two additional control analyses. The original figure set has been consolidated into a more concise, reader-friendly format.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-html

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2026) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-05-23T02:00:01.238055+00:00
License: CC-BY-4.0