Biological Evaluation of Novel 2-Benzimidazole Derivatives for Antibacterial Activity

preprint OA: closed
📄 Open PDF Full text JSON View at publisher
Full text 1,693 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
Abstract Infectious diseases remain a persistent global health burden, with bacterial infections predominating. The growing global burden of drug-resistant infections has led to greater emphasis on the discovery and development of novel antibacterial compounds. In an attempt to discover new potent antibacterials, the antibacterial activity of novel 2-substituted benzimidazole derivatives (NR-1 to NR-9) was evaluated in this study against three bacteria, viz. M. smegmatis, B. subtilis and E. coli in vitro using Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (MIC) and Minimum Bactericidal Concentration (MBC). Among the nine derivatives assessed, two (NR-4 and NR-5) exhibited inhibitory activity against M. smegmatis, while two (NR-5 and NR-7) were active against B. subtilis, with MICs between 62.5 and 250 μg/ml. Notably, NR-5 demonstrated antibacterial activity against both M. smegmatis and B. subtilis, with more efficacy against M. smegmatis (MIC: 62.5 μg/ml), which was considerably closer to rifampicin (MIC: 31.25 μg/ml). Cytotoxicity analysis of these derivatives in Vero cells indicated minimal toxicity for NR-4 and NR-5, and SwissADME evaluation suggested favourable physicochemical properties and drug-likeness, supporting good oral bioavailability. Moreover, the growth kinetics profiling of the NR-5 Benzimidazole derivative demonstrated that it inhibited the growth of M. smegmatis effectively, even after prolonged exposure. These findings highlighted the promise of the active benzimidazole derivative, NR-5, as a potential candidate for developing a more effective and less toxic antimycobacterial drug. Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2026) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-06-15T06:18:04.506796+00:00