Magnetic resonance imaging findings of endometrioid adenocarcinoma of the ovary

In: Radiation Medicine · 2007 · vol. 25(7) , pp. 346–354 · doi:10.1007/s11604-007-0151-5 · PMID:17705005 · W1981595367
article OA: closed CC0 ⤵ 4 in-corpus citations
Limited metadata. Only one source feed has indexed this record so far — no abstract, full text, or open-access copy is available through Endo Lab. The publisher's page (linked below) is the canonical location for the actual content. If you have institutional access, use "Find at my library".
AI-generated summary by claude@2026-06+body, 2026-06-08

This study assessed magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) features of ovarian endometrioid adenocarcinoma in 31 patients, finding that lesions arising from endometriomas were more often cystic and showed better prognosis.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

AI-generated deep summary by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-09

This retrospective study evaluated MRI features and clinical characteristics of 39 surgically proven ovarian endometrioid adenocarcinomas in 31 patients, comparing tumors arising from proven endometriomas (group A) versus those without coexisting endometrioma (group B). Lesions were classified on MRI as solid versus cystic, with the cystic type defined as cystic lesions with one or more mural nodules; tumors in group A showed a cystic pattern more often (11 cystic-type in group A vs 24 solid-type in group B; P < 0.0001). Group B tumors had higher nuclear grade (P = 0.0028) and more advanced clinical stage (P = 0.0018), and among cystic-type lesions in group A, endometrioma-associated cysts rarely showed “shading” on T2-weighted images. This paper is centrally about endometriosis — it specifically compares ovarian endometrioid adenocarcinoma cases that arose from proven endometriomas versus those without endometrioma and characterizes their MRI appearance and associated prognostic features.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Citation neighborhood

Papers in the corpus that this work cites (lower rings, blue) and that cite this one (upper rings, green). Dot size scales with the paper's in-corpus citation count — bigger dot = more influential within the endo/adeno field. Click a dot to open that paper. [ expand to 2 hops ] — adds papers reached through this work's immediate citers/citees. Heavier; up to 60 extra dots.

References (15)

Cited by (4)

Source provenance

openalex
last seen: 2026-06-10T17:14:06.276822+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-06-17T06:32:23.968882+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK