Full text
56,111 characters
· extracted from
preprint-html
· click to expand
Oncogenic H-Ras Reprograms Madin-Darby Canine Kidney (MDCK) Cell-derived Midbody Remnant Proteins Following Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition | bioRxiv /* */ /* */ <!-- <!-- /*! * yepnope1.5.4 * (c) WTFPL, GPLv2 */ (function(a,b,c){function d(a){return"[object Function]"==o.call(a)}function e(a){return"string"==typeof a}function f(){}function g(a){return!a||"loaded"==a||"complete"==a||"uninitialized"==a}function h(){var a=p.shift();q=1,a?a.t?m(function(){("c"==a.t?B.injectCss:B.injectJs)(a.s,0,a.a,a.x,a.e,1)},0):(a(),h()):q=0}function i(a,c,d,e,f,i,j){function k(b){if(!o&&g(l.readyState)&&(u.r=o=1,!q&&h(),l.onload=l.onreadystatechange=null,b)){"img"!=a&&m(function(){t.removeChild(l)},50);for(var d in y[c])y[c].hasOwnProperty(d)&&y[c][d].onload()}}var j=j||B.errorTimeout,l=b.createElement(a),o=0,r=0,u={t:d,s:c,e:f,a:i,x:j};1===y[c]&&(r=1,y[c]=[]),"object"==a?l.data=c:(l.src=c,l.type=a),l.width=l.height="0",l.onerror=l.onload=l.onreadystatechange=function(){k.call(this,r)},p.splice(e,0,u),"img"!=a&&(r||2===y[c]?(t.insertBefore(l,s?null:n),m(k,j)):y[c].push(l))}function j(a,b,c,d,f){return q=0,b=b||"j",e(a)?i("c"==b?v:u,a,b,this.i++,c,d,f):(p.splice(this.i++,0,a),1==p.length&&h()),this}function k(){var a=B;return a.loader={load:j,i:0},a}var l=b.documentElement,m=a.setTimeout,n=b.getElementsByTagName("script")[0],o={}.toString,p=[],q=0,r="MozAppearance"in l.style,s=r&&!!b.createRange().compareNode,t=s?l:n.parentNode,l=a.opera&&"[object Opera]"==o.call(a.opera),l=!!b.attachEvent&&!l,u=r?"object":l?"script":"img",v=l?"script":u,w=Array.isArray||function(a){return"[object Array]"==o.call(a)},x=[],y={},z={timeout:function(a,b){return b.length&&(a.timeout=b[0]),a}},A,B;B=function(a){function b(a){var a=a.split("!"),b=x.length,c=a.pop(),d=a.length,c={url:c,origUrl:c,prefixes:a},e,f,g;for(f=0;f<d;f++)g=a[f].split("="),(e=z[g.shift()])&&(c=e(c,g));for(f=0;f<b;f++)c=x[f](c);return c}function g(a,e,f,g,h){var i=b(a),j=i.autoCallback;i.url.split(".").pop().split("?").shift(),i.bypass||(e&&(e=d(e)?e:e[a]||e[g]||e[a.split("/").pop().split("?")[0]]),i.instead?i.instead(a,e,f,g,h):(y[i.url]?i.noexec=!0:y[i.url]=1,f.load(i.url,i.forceCSS||!i.forceJS&&"css"==i.url.split(".").pop().split("?").shift()?"c":c,i.noexec,i.attrs,i.timeout),(d(e)||d(j))&&f.load(function(){k(),e&&e(i.origUrl,h,g),j&&j(i.origUrl,h,g),y[i.url]=2})))}function h(a,b){function c(a,c){if(a){if(e(a))c||(j=function(){var a=[].slice.call(arguments);k.apply(this,a),l()}),g(a,j,b,0,h);else if(Object(a)===a)for(n in m=function(){var b=0,c;for(c in a)a.hasOwnProperty(c)&&b++;return b}(),a)a.hasOwnProperty(n)&&(!c&&!--m&&(d(j)?j=function(){var a=[].slice.call(arguments);k.apply(this,a),l()}:j[n]=function(a){return function(){var b=[].slice.call(arguments);a&&a.apply(this,b),l()}}(k[n])),g(a[n],j,b,n,h))}else!c&&l()}var h=!!a.test,i=a.load||a.both,j=a.callback||f,k=j,l=a.complete||f,m,n;c(h?a.yep:a.nope,!!i),i&&c(i)}var i,j,l=this.yepnope.loader;if(e(a))g(a,0,l,0);else if(w(a))for(i=0;i (function(w,d,s,l,i){w[l]=w[l]||[];w[l].push({'gtm.start':new Date().getTime(),event:'gtm.js'});var f=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0];var j=d.createElement(s);var dl=l!='dataLayer'?'&l='+l:'';j.src='//www.googletagmanager.com/gtm.js?id='+i+dl;j.type='text/javascript';j.async=true;f.parentNode.insertBefore(j,f);})(window,document,'script','dataLayer','GTM-M677548'); Skip to main content Home About Submit ALERTS / RSS Search for this keyword Advanced Search New Results Oncogenic H-Ras Reprograms Madin-Darby Canine Kidney (MDCK) Cell-derived Midbody Remnant Proteins Following Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition Adnan Shafiq , Alin Rai , Rong Xu , Maoshan Chen , Wittaya Suwakulsiri , View ORCID Profile David W. Greening , Richard J. Simpson doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.07.17.665448 Adnan Shafiq 1 Department of Biochemistry and Chemistry, La Trobe Institute for Molecular Science (LIMS), School of Agriculture , Biomedicine and Environment (SABE), La Trobe University , Melbourne, Victoria 3086, Australia 2 Department of Cancer Biology and Department of Cell and Development Biology, Vanderbilt University Medical School , Nashville, TN 37232, USA Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site Alin Rai 3 Baker Heart and Diabetes Institute , Melbourne, Victoria 3004, Australia 4 Baker Department of Cardiovascular Research , Translation and Implementation, La Trobe University , Melbourne, Victoria 3086, Australia 5 Baker Department of Cardiometabolic Health, University of Melbourne , Melbourne, Victoria, 3010, Australia Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site For correspondence: Richard.Simpson{at}latrobe.edu.au david.greening{at}baker.edu.au alin.rai{at}baker.edu.au Rong Xu 6 Nanobiotechnology Laboratory, Australia Centre for Blood Diseases, Centre Clinical School, Monash University , Melbourne, Victoria, 3004, Australia Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site Maoshan Chen 7 Laboratory of Radiation Biology, Laboratory of Precision Medicine, Department of Blood Transfusion, Laboratory Medicine Centre, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Army Medical University , Chongqing 400037, China Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site Wittaya Suwakulsiri 8 Frazer Institute, Translational Research Institute (TRI), The University of Queensland , Brisbane, Queensland, Australia Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site David W. Greening 3 Baker Heart and Diabetes Institute , Melbourne, Victoria 3004, Australia 4 Baker Department of Cardiovascular Research , Translation and Implementation, La Trobe University , Melbourne, Victoria 3086, Australia 5 Baker Department of Cardiometabolic Health, University of Melbourne , Melbourne, Victoria, 3010, Australia Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site ORCID record for David W. Greening For correspondence: Richard.Simpson{at}latrobe.edu.au david.greening{at}baker.edu.au alin.rai{at}baker.edu.au Richard J. Simpson 1 Department of Biochemistry and Chemistry, La Trobe Institute for Molecular Science (LIMS), School of Agriculture , Biomedicine and Environment (SABE), La Trobe University , Melbourne, Victoria 3086, Australia Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site For correspondence: Richard.Simpson{at}latrobe.edu.au david.greening{at}baker.edu.au alin.rai{at}baker.edu.au Abstract Full Text Info/History Metrics Preview PDF Abstract Epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) is a highly conserved morphogenic process that allows highly polarized, immotile epithelial cells to transform into motile mesenchymal cells: it is a fundamental cellular process involved in embryonic development, tumour cell metastasis, organ fibrosis and tissue regeneration. To assess the contribution of secreted midbody remnants (MBRs) - a new class of membranous extracellular vesicle (EV) molecularly distinct from exosomes/small EVs – to the EMT process, we conducted a proteomic analysis of MBRs released from Madin-Darby canine kidney (MDCK) cells, and MDCK cells transformed with oncogenic H-Ras (21D1 cells). MBRs were harvested from cell culture media in milligram quantities using a continuous culture bioreactor device and purified using sequential centrifugation and buoyant density gradient centrifugation (OptiPrep™). Gel-MS/MS protein profiling showed MDCK cell-MBRs reflect their epithelial origin (e.g., enriched CDH1, DSP, THBS1, OLCN, EPCAM proteins) and 21D1 cell-MBRs their mesenchymal phenotype (e.g., HRAS, VIM, MMP14, CDH2, WNT5A and enriched invasive and cell motility proteins). Prominent findings were the unique expression of the immune checkpoint protein NT5E/CD73 (ecto-5′-nucleotidase), and ser/thr kinases LIMK1/K2 in 21D1-MBRs (not present in MDCK cell-MBRs), and enrichment in Wnt signalling network proteins. Collectively, our findings suggest MBRs might play a previously unrecognized role in the EMT process. Significance Epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT) is a critical cell biological process that occurs during normal embryonic development and cancer progression. Our study describes, for the first time, the large-scale sequential purification of secreted midbody remnants (MBRs) and exosomes/sEVs from the in vitro cell line EMT model Madin-Darby canine kidney (MDCK) cells and MDCK cells transformed with oncogenic H-Ras (21D1 cells): GeLC-MS/MS protein profiling identified the repertoire of enriched MDCK-MBR proteins following EMT. MBRs display a proteome profile distinct from sEVs that is enriched with factors of the centralspindlin complex (KIF23.1, KIF4A, INCENP, CEP55, PLK1) and further include components of the mitochondrial network, cytokinesis, microtubule movement, and intercellular connection. In the context of EMT, our data reveal simultaneous activation of EMT signalling pathways in MBRs including signalling receptor binding, regulation of cell differentiation, and Wnt, VEGF and PDGF signalling. We identify several mesenchymal enriched networks in MBRs associated with focal adhesion, cell matrix, kinase activity, and cell shape/organisation, while epithelial derived MBRs are show enriched networks predominately associated with mitochondrial (processing/transport), midbody, and plasma membrane annotation. Our study sheds light on the signalling architecture of MBRs following oncogenic H- Ras-induced EMT: collectively, our data informs ongoing efforts to delineate oncogenic drivers of cancer initiation, progression, and metastasis. 1 INTRODUCTION Epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) is an evolutionary-conserved cellular process that enables highly polarized immotile epithelial cells to lose their epithelial cell attributes such as cell-cell and cell-matrix connectivity and acquire features of mesenchymal cell phenotype such as elongated morphology, increased motility, reduced proliferation rate 1 ; this highly- regulated program is critical for both normal physiological and pathological processes such as early embryogenesis, wound healing, tissue regeneration, and cancer progression 2 – 4 . EMT can be induced in epithelial cancer cells by several stimuli, including activation of proto- oncogenes (e.g., Ras), growth factor receptor pathways (e.g., those driven by transforming growth factor-β (TGFβ), hepatocyte growth factor (HGF) receptor (MET), or epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), for example. Multiple cellular regulatory networks have been implicated in triggering EMT such as tyrosine kinase receptors (e.g., epidermal growth factor (EGF), fibroblast growth factor (FGF), connective tissue growth factor, platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF), insulin-like growth factor (IGF) etc.), and signalling pathways involving integrin interactions, Wnt proteins, nuclear factor NK-κβ, and TGF-β 2 , 3 , 5 – 7 . It has been shown that soluble protein factors secreted into the extracellular space (the secretome ) play a critical role in eliciting the EMT programme 3 , 8 , 9 . To identify extracellular modulators of the EMT process, which may influence tumour cell state and invasive potential, we previously assessed the secretome (soluble-secreted proteins) 10 , 11 and small EVs 12 , 13 ) released from Madin-Darby canine kidney (MDCK) cells, and MDCK cells transformed with oncogenic H-Ras (21D1 cells) – for reviews, see 14 , 15 and references therein. These secretome-based proteomic analyses revealed extracellular effectors that coordinate biological responses that enhance cell mobility, reduce cell-cell contact and cell-matrix adhesion proteins, and remodel the extracellular matrix (ECM) 10 , 16 . Taken together, our findings indicated that H-Ras induced EMT in MDCK cells resulted in extensive reprogramming of the protein repertoire of exosomes/sEVs – revealed by comparing the proteomes of MDCK cell-derived exosomes (MDCK-Exos) and 21D1 cell-derived exosomes (21D1-Exos) 17 - including the selective remodelling of regulators of metastatic niche formation, and transcription/splicing factors related to EMT 12 . We further demonstrated that MDCK/21D1 cell derived microvesicles (MVs) - a EV subclass arising from plasma membrane blebbing - has a distinct proteome composition, compared to MDCK/21D1-Exos, and functional invasive capacity following EMT 13 . To assess the contribution of a newly described EV (secreted midbody remnants, sMBR) to the EMT programme, we conducted a proteomic analysis of MBRs released from MDCK/21D1 cells. MBRs which have a particle diameter range of 200-600[nm are a major class of membranous EVs, released from most cell types, that arise by symmetrical cytokinetic abscission during final phase of mitosis (telophase) 17 – 20 . In our present study we conducted large-scale purification of MBRs and small EVs/exosomes released from MDCK/21D1 cells (sEVs), and determined their proteome composition using high sensitivity proteomic profiling. We demonstrate that MBRs released from MDCK/21D1 cells have distinct proteome repertoires compared to their sEV counterparts: they are enriched in cytokinesis factors in midbodies (e.g., KIF23 and RACGAP1 18 , 21 ) and enriched components associated with mitochondrial network and cytokinesis, microtubule movement, and intercellular connection. We further differential abundance of networks associated with key processes of EMT in H-Ras-induced EMT in MDCK cells including signal transduction (HRAS, PLAUR, RGS12), plasticity (TNC, VGF), polarity (MARK1, FRMD4A, MPP1, FZD2), and the EMT process (TEAD1, MCU, ESRP1, ESRP2, PKP3, TJP3). We report EMT-related transcriptional and post-transcriptional regulators, including TEAD1, MCU, ESRP1, ESRP2, PKP3, and TJP3, suggesting broader reprogramming of gene expression and cell adhesion machinery. Findings from this study provide new knowledge on the signalling architecture of MBRs following H-Ras-induced EMT in MDCK cells. 2 EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES 2.1 Continuous cell culture and large-scale purification of MBRs and sEVs/Exos Madin-Darby canine kidney (MDCK) cells, and MDCK cells transformed with oncogenic H- Ras (21D1 cells) cells 12 , 13 , 22 were cultured as described 12 , 13 , 22 . Primarily for large-scale EV production, 3 x 10 6 MDCK and 21D1 cells were seeded separately in CELLine AD1000 Bioreactor classic flasks (Integra Biosciences) using EV-depleted FCS (centrifuged at 100,000 g for 18 hrs) and incubated for two weeks 13 , 19 , 21 . EV types were purified from collected culture media 19 . For each collection, MDCK and 21D1 culture media was sequentially centrifuged at 500 g for 5 min (to remove floating cells), 2,000 g for 10 min (to remove apoptotic body debris) and 10,000 g for 30 min at 4 °C as described 19 , 21 (see Supplementary Fig. S1). The 10K pellet was subjected to buoyant density (isopycnic iodixanol (OptiPrep™) gradient centrifugation using a top-down manner as described 23 and buoyant density fraction #9 (1.21 g/mL) was taken for proteomic sample preparation. MDCK/21D1 cell derived sEVs/exosomes were purified from the 100K-10K supernatant, as described 19 , and fraction #7 (OptiPrep™ buoyant density, 1.10 g/mL) was taken for proteome analyses. 2.2 Protein quantitation and western blot analysis Protein quantification of purified EV samples, and western blot analyses were determined as described 18 , 21 , 24 . For Western blot analysis membranes were probed with primary antibodies (anti-mouse ALIX, 1:1,000, Cell Signalling, Cat. No. 2171), (anti-mouse TSG101, 1:1,000, BD Bioscience, Cat. No. 612697), (anti-rabbit GAPDH, 1:3,000, Cell Signalling, Cat. No. 2118), (anti-mouse KIF23, 1:1,000, Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Cat. No. sc-390113), (anti- TGM2, 1:1000, Invitrogen, Cat. No. MA5-12739), (anti-beta actin, 1:1000, Invitrogen, Cat. No. MA1-91399), (anti-mouse RACGAP1, 1:1,000, Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Cat. No. sc- 271110) according to manufacturer’s instructions. The secondary antibodies (IRDye800 goat anti-mouse IgG (Cat. No. AP308P) or IRDye700 goat anti-rabbit IgG (Cat. No. SAB4600400)) were diluted (1:15,000) and the fluorescent signals were detected using the Odyssey Infrared Imaging System, v3.0 (Li-COR Biosciences, Nebraska USA). 2.3 EV biophysical characterisation Cryo-transmission electron microscopic analyses on EV samples were performed as described 18 , 25 . MBR and sEV particle diameters were determined by nanoparticle tracking analysis (NTA; NanoSight NS300, Malvern) as described 25 . 2.4 Proteomic sample preparation MDCK/21D1-MBR/ sEV samples (n=3, 10 µg) were lysed in 1% v/v sodium dodecyl sulphate (SDS), 50 mM triethylammonium bicarbonate (TEAB), pH 8.0, incubated at 95 °C for 5 mins and quantified by microBCA (Thermo Fisher Scientific) as described 26 . Proteomic sample preparation was performed using single-pot solid-phase-enhanced sample preparation (SP3) 27 as described 28 , 29 . 2.5 Liquid Chromatography–Tandem Mass Spectrometry Peptides were analysed on a Dionex UltiMate NCS-3500RS nanoUHPLC coupled to a Q- Exactive HF-X hybrid quadrupole-Orbitrap mass spectrometer equipped with a nanospray ion source in positive, data-independent acquisition mode as described 27 , 28 with minor modifications. Peptides were loaded (Acclaim PepMap100 C18 5 µm beads with 100 Å pore- size, Thermo Fisher Scientific) and separated (1.9-µm particle size C18, 0.075 × 250 mm, Nikkyo Technos Co. Ltd) with a gradient of 2–80% acetonitrile containing 0.1% formic acid over 110 min at 300 nL min-1 at 55°C (in-house enclosed column heater). Full scan MS were performed in the m/z range of 350 to 1100 m/z with a 120,000 resolution, using an automatic gain control (AGC) of 3 x 10 6 , maximum injection time of 50 ms and 1 microscan. MS2 was set to 45,000 resolution, 1e6 AGC target and the first fixed mass set to 120 m/z. Default charge state set to 2 and recorded in centroid mode. Total scan windows (65) were performed with staggered isolation window from 350 to 1100 m/z and applied with 28% normalized collision energy as described 30 . MS-based proteomics data is deposited to the ProteomeXchange Consortium via the MASSive partner repository and available via MASSive with identifier (MSV000093044). 2.6 Data processing and informatic analysis Peptide identification and quantification were performed as described previously using DIA- NN (v1.8) 31 against Canis lupus familiaris (dog, UP000002254) reference proteome (59,101 entries, downloaded 12-2022). Spectral libraries were predicted using the deep learning algorithm employed by in DIA-NN with Trypsin/P, allowing up to 1 missed cleavage 31 . The precursor change range was set to 1-4, and the m/z precursor range was set to 300-1800 for peptides consisting of 7-30 amino acids with N-term methionine excision and cysteine carbamidomethylation enabled as a fixed modification with 0 maximum number of variable modifications. The mass spectra were analysed using default settings with a false discovery rate (FDR) of 1% for precursor identifications and match between runs (MBR) enabled for replicates 27 . The resulting output files contaminants and reverse identifications were removed and further analysed using Perseus (v2.0.7.0). Perseus was applied for downstream data processing and analysis. Data quality cut-off was applied with minimum 50% protein group quantification in at least one group. Hierarchical clustering was performed in Perseus using Euclidian distance and average linkage clustering. Gene ontology (biological process, specific level 10) and KEGG pathways (organism: hsa, pvalue cutoff: 0.05) were analysed based on highly-enriched proteins from the statistical analysis using cluster Profiler 32 (v.3.11, https://bioconductor.org/packages/release/bioc/html/clusterProfiler.html ) in R. Principle component analysis, dot, box, and ridge plots were visualized using ggplot (v.3.3.2, https://ggplot2.tidyverse.org/ ) in R. Heatmaps were visualized using pheatmap (v.1.0.12, https://www.rdocumentation.org/packages/pheatmap/versions/1.0.12 ) in R. Venn diagram was generated using a web-based tool ( http://www.interactivenn.net/ ) 33 . KEGG pathway analysis was visualized using pathview (v.3.1.2, http://bioconductor.org/packages/release/bioc/html/pathview.html ) 34 in R. 3 RESULTS 3.1 Midbody remnants are secreted from MDCK cells Previously, we demonstrated that cultured MDCK cells – epithelial cell phenotype - undergoing oncogenic H-Ras induced EMT (21D1 cells) – mesenchymal cell phenotype – secrete proteins and membrane-encapsulated vesicles important for remodelling the extracellular environment and promoting cell motility and invasion 12 , 35 , 36 : prominent were extracellular matrix (ECM) proteins, cell migration factors, growth factors, proteases and extracellular vesicles – chiefly, small EVs/exosomes (MDCK-Exos, 21D1-Exos). MDCK cells are highly polarised and exhibit a cobblestone-like morphology, while 21D1 cells have a fibroblast appearance and display a spindle-shaped mesenchymal cell morphology ( Fig. 1A ). Differential centrifugation and buoyant density gradient separation (iodixanol, OptiPrep™) was used in tandem to purify MBRs and exosomes from MDCK / 21D1 cell culture 19 , 21 – see Supplementary Fig. S1 for purification strategy. Milligram amounts of purified MBRs were obtained from culture media (CM) by growing parental cells in a continuous bioreactor culture device (CELLine™AD-1000) 13 : typically, 260 mL culture medium (CM) was harvested from the bioreactor device over 36 days – 20 mL per day, 13 days for each biological replicate, n=3. For each buoyant density gradient centrifugation (iodixanol, OptiPrep™) 12 1-mL fractions were manually collected (Supplementary Fig. S1) and subjected to immunoblot analysis: anti-MKLP1/KIF23 and anti-RACGAP1 antibodies were used to identify MBRs in the resuspended 10K pellet; and anti-ALEX and anti- TSG101antibodies to detect exosomes in the resuspended 100K-10K fractions (Supplementary Fig. S3A-D). An inspection of Supplementary Figure S3A-D showed that fraction #9 in the resuspended 10K pellet (buoyant density ∼1.12 g/mL) is enriched in MBRs, and fraction #7 in resuspended 100K-10K pellet (buoyant density ∼1.10 g/mL). MBRs derived from both MDCK and 21D1 cell lines displayed round membranous vesicle structure (based on cryo-EM, Fig. 1B ) with a particle diameters of 50 to 680 nm and NTA showed particle diameters of 300-315 nm: in comparison, MDCK-/21D1-Exos were much smaller (30-195 nm diameter based on cryo-EM, and NTA, exhibited a much smaller diameter range – MDCK-Exos 181.5 nm and 21D1-Exos 157.6 nm (according to NTA analysis). Collectively, these data reveal that MBRs and exosomes/sEVs are biophysically distinct. The yields of MBRs and exosomes/sEVs from 260 mL CM, based on protein quantitation analyses, were in the range 1300-1500 µg (MDCK-/21D1-MBRs) and 315-436 µg for MDCK-/21D1-Exos. Download figure Open in new tab Figure 1. Biophysical and proteome characterisation of MBRs and exosomes oncogenic H-Ras transformed MDCK. A, Cryo-electron microscopy for EV morphology and size distribution. Scale bar, 500 nm. B, Cryo-electron microscopy EV size distribution analysis (each dot represents EV diameter analysis). C, Bar plots for proteins identified and protein distribution based on LFQ normalized intensities for MBRs and exosomes from each cell type (n=3). D, Distribution of protein abundance (LFQ intensity, log2) of each proteome (n=3). E, Hierarchical cluster analysis of MDCK and 21D1 cells and EV subtypes ( P <0.05, fold change (FC): log2(1.5)), reveals distinct clusters of differential protein abundance based on EV type (MBRs and exosomes). F, Gene Ontology enrichment analysis (ranked, P <0.05) of different clusters based on biological process. 3.2 Proteome analysis of MDCK- and 21D1-cell derived MBRs and sEVs Quantitative mass spectrometry using high sensitivity data-independent acquisition 27 , using stringent peptide/protein identification criteria (1% false discovery rate) identified a total 8737 proteins for all MDCK-/21D1 derived MBRs and sEV preparations analyzed – samples were analyzed in triplicate (n=3). Of these, 4423 proteins were identified in all sample groups in at least n=2 out of 3 biological replicates: protein distribution was based on normalized intensities across all samples - see Figure 1 , panels C and D, and Supplementary Table S1). The distinct EV proteomes reported here are highly dynamic, spanning about seven orders of magnitude as measured by their protein abundance (precursor ion intensities), with ACTB, ANXA2, GAPDH, H4C9, and HRAS being top ranked proteins across these datasets based on abundance (intensity) (Supplementary Table S1). Hierarchical clustering . Unsupervised hierarchical clustering of protein expression profiles ( Fig. 1E ) revealed that MBR and sEV proteomes were distinct: MBR/sEV proteomes were combined for each parental cell type ( P 1.5, p<0.05) in comparison to different EV subtypes (Supplementary Table S2). EV marker distribution was analysed across MBR and exosome populations. sEVs/Exos are enriched in classical markers of small EVs (CD44, CD63, CD9, PDCD6IP (Alix), RAB7A, ITGB1) ( Fig. 1E ) whereas MBRs were enriched in proteins associated with the centraspindlin complex (KIF23.1, KIF4A, INCENP, CEP55, PLK1) ( Fig. 1E ). Importantly, these protein markers were associated to EV type, independent of parental epithelial (MDCK) or mesenchymal (21D1) cell origin. Interestingly, the majority of core EV proteins 37 including proposed universal markers of exosomes - Syntenin 1 (SDCBP) 37 and MISEV inclusion protein markers 38 , 39 - indicated that EV proteins, including CD47, RAB10, and TSG101 were identified in all EV groups (Supplementary Table S1). Gene Ontology (GO) GO enrichment analysis revealed enrichment of MBR components associated with cellular location and functions associated with cytokinesis, mitotic spindle midzone assemble, in addition to localisation associated with microtubule network and intercellular bridge ( Fig. 1F , Supplementary Fig. S2). In contrast, sEVs were enriched with biological processes associated with multivesicular body assembly, membrane fission, integrin-mediated singling, as well as factors associated with ESCRT complex, focal adhesions, and cell-substrate junctions. Collectively, these data show that MDCK//21D1 cell derived MBRs, and exosomes have distinct proteomes. 3.3 Proteins selectively enriched in MBRs released from MDCK cells following oncogenic H-Ras induced EMT Next, we were curious about whether the MBR proteome from oncogenic H-Ras transformed MBCK cells might reveal new insights into EMT biology. Inspection of the volcano plot in Figure. 2A reveals 267 proteins in 21D1 -derived MBRs are significantly enriched (FC>1.5, p<0.05) and 31/267 are unique to these vesicles (i.e., not seen in MDCK-derived MBRs or sEVs ( Fig. 2A , Supplementary Table S1, S3). Of note, networks associated with this 31- protein subset include Interferon Signaling (R-HSA-913531), Cytokine Signaling in Immune system (R-HSA-1280215), and PKR-mediated signaling (R-HSA-9833482), linked with tumor cell regulation, metastasis and EMT process 40 – 43 . Prominent amongst the 267 proteins enriched in 21D1-MBRs are EMT-related factors WNT5A, STOML3, VGF, MARCKS, and CD70. OIn contrast, ADGRF1, VILL, TSPO, KRT7, and ITGB6 were significantly up- regulated in MDCK-derived MBRs (Supplementary Table S1-S2). We highlight differential abundance of key proteins associated with key processes of EMT in H-Ras-induced EMT in MDCK cells such as signal transduction (up-regulated: HRAS, PLAUR, RGS12), plasticity (up-regulated: TNC, VGF), polarity (up-regulated: MARK1, FRMD4A, MPP1, FZD2), and the EMT process (down-regulated: TEAD1, MCU, ESRP1, ESRP2, PKP3, TJP3) ( Table 1 ). Findings from this study provide new knowledge on the signalling architecture of MDCK- MBRs following H-Ras-induced EMT. Download figure Open in new tab Figure 2. Remodelled proteome cargo of MBRs following H-Ras-induced oncogenic EMT. A, Volcano plot for pair-wise comparison of MBRs proteome in MDCK or 21D1 cells (n=3). Enriched[(blue) or depleted (red), p-value (log10) 1.5 relative to 21D1 MBR. Protein expression non-significant as shown, ns. B, Gene Ontology enrichment analysis (ranked, P <0.05) of pairwise comparison of MBRs based on cellular component, biological processes, KEGG pathway analyses, ddisease ontology (DO) in the context of disease, and Reactome analyses. C, Pathway map of Reactome pathways enriched in MBRs (21D1/MDCK, red enrichment in 21D1). Black vertical lines indicate positions where proteins associated with Wnt signalling pathway are in the ranked gene list. Gene Set Enrichment Analysis of KEGG enriched networks in MBRs (p-adj, <0.05), supports enrichment in 21D1-MBRs (yellow) relative to MDCK-MBRs. Gene Ontology analysis of MDCK-MBRs revealed enrichment of cellular regions and biological processes associated with mitochondrial matrix, ribosome biogenesis, apical junction complex, midbody, basement membrane, rRNA processing, mitotic cytokinesis, and palmitoyl transferase complex ( Fig. 2B ). In contrast, GO terms enriched in 21D1-MBRs included processes associated predominantly with EMT and cancer progression, including focal adhesion, cell leading edge, collagen-containing extracellular matrix, wound healing, and the positive regulation of kinase and GTPase activity ( Fig. 2B , Supplementary Table S4). Further differential analysis of MBR proteome associated with MDCK-MBRs (FC<-1.5, p <0.05) displayed upregulation in various processes related to mitochondrial translation, the tricarboxylic acid (TCA) cycle, and rRNA processing ( Fig. 2B ). In contrast, for upregulated proteins in 21D1-MBRs (FC>1.5, p<0.05) using KEGG and Reactome pathway analysis revealed categories associated with PDGF and VEGF-A/R signalling pathways, Rab GTPase regulation, interferon alpha/beta responses, fibril dissolution, proteoglycan in cancer, and Rap1 signalling pathway ( Fig. 2B ). WNT signalling pathway components (WNT5A, PLCB1, CCND1, PORCN, FZD2, CHP1, PRKCA, MAPK9, PPP3CC, PPP2R5B, NFAT5, DVL1) were further identified to be significantly enriched relative to the entire MBR proteome from MDCK and 21D1 cells ( Fig. 2C ). This was further supported by KEGG analysis using Gene Set Enrichment Analysis (GSEA), which further identified WNT signalling pathway as being enriched in MBRs following H-Ras mediated EMT ( Fig. 2C ). These data highlight the significant remodelling of MBRs proteome occurs following H-Ras induced EMT (network analysis of enriched biological processes, signalling networks associated with 21D1-MBRs, Fig. 3 ), to support potential signalling capacity of MBRs in the context of EMT. Download figure Open in new tab Figure 3. Protein interaction network of 21D1 cell derived-MBRs. STRING protein interaction network for proteins differentially enriched in 21D1-cell derived MBRs based on pair-wise comparison of MBRs proteome relative to MDCK cell derived MBRs. Significantly enriched central terms/pathways/networks are shown in addition proteins associated with each node. 4 DISCUSSION In this study, we describe a large-scale purification procedure for obtaining milligram amounts of highly purified MBRs and exosomes/sEVs from MDCK cells transformed with oncogenic H-Ras. The purification procedure involved continuous culture of MDCK/21D1 cells (CELLine™AD-1000) followed by processing the CM by sequential use of differential centrifugation and buoyant density centrifugation (iodixanol, OptiPrep™). This workflow enabled milligram amounts of EVs for biochemical characterization. High-sensitivity data- independent acquisition (DIA) mass spectrometry was used to obtain protein profiles for MDCK/ 21D1 MBRs and exosomes/sEVs. Our analysis showed that MDCK-MBRs and 21D1-MBRs have distinct protein signatures that distinguish one MBR from another as well as exosomes/sEVs derived from the same parental cell lines. We describe key signaling networks in MBRs for the first time, highlighting oncogenic signaling factors, changes in ECM organization, and associated functions of cytokine signaling, Wnt signaling, protein localization, and membrane trafficking, associated with MBRs following EMT. Identified proteins common to both MDCK-/ and 21D1 derived from MBRs reflect their respective parental cells: these include classical EMT markers, such as VIM, MMP14, CDH2, WNT5A, and HRAS from 21D1 cells, while proteins associated with MDCK epithelial cells, included CDH1, DSP, OCLN, THBS1, and EPCAM. Proteins enriched in exosomes correlated with known exosomal marker proteins: for example, PDCD6IP (ALIX), CD9/44, and RAB7A, and various tetraspanins and ESCRT related factors such as ESCRT 0 (HGS, STAM1), ESCRT I (MVB12A/B, TSG101, VPS26, VPS37), ESCRT II (VPS25, VPS36) and ESCRT III (CHMP1, CHMP2A/B, CHMP3, CHMP4A/B). Proteins enriched in MDCK-/21D1 derived MBRs included markers related to cytokinesis, such as KIF4A, KIF23, INCENP, CEP55, and PLK1. We also noticed other categories of proteins such as mitochondrial proteins, splicing factors, RNA binding proteins and DNA binding components were significantly enriched in MBRs, consistent with our previous findings for the isogenic colorectal cells lines SW480/SW620 18 , 21 . Additionally, we identified several integrin components that were significantly enriched in 21D1-MBRs – for example, ITGB1/2/4/5, ITGAV/3/5/6/10. In the case of MDCK-MBRs the only integrins identified were ITGA3 and ITGB6. In addition to their ascribed functions in cancer progression 44 , 45 , integrins have been shown to be important in exosomal delivery and organotrophic metastasis 46 . Consistent with our finding of integrins in MDCK/21D1- MBRs, Prekeris and colleagues report that secreted midbodies (referred to as ‘midbodysomes’) require integrins and EGF receptor tyrosine kinase signalling for their functionality 18 , 47 . As expected, GO analysis revealed cytokinesis-related proteins commensurate with MBR biogenesis - such as mitotic spindle midzone assemble, and proteins associated with midbody localisation in the intercellular bridge (e.g., KIF14, KIF4A, KIF23, CDK1 etc). A salient finding in our study was the remodelling of the MDCK-derived MBR proteome following oncogenic H-Ras induced EMT. Our data analyses support previous findings that EVs comprise signalling factors associated with Wnt and can regulate EMT 12 , 13 , 48 , 49 . Expression of the Wnt family is strongly associated with epithelial differentiation, including capacity to promote EMT and metastasis of pancreatic cancer cells and non-small-cell lung cancer cells 49 , 50 . Wnt5a is known as a typical non-canonical and Wnt protein is associated with the progress and development in many malignant tumours. Many previous studies have demonstrated that Wnt5a is up regulated in various cancers, including gastric, colorectal, pancreatic, and prostate cancers 51 . WNT5A produced by the TME enables the activation of CDC42, a small GTPase of the Rho family, in hematopoietic stem cells and results in EV release, including sEVs/Exos 52 . However, given that such sEVs were isolated with a direct ultracentrifugation strategy, which may contain other EV subtypes that co-purify (e.g., MBRs) that likely contributed to these Wnt5a findings. Indeed, this is supported by the fact we identify various pro-angiogenic factors including VEGF in both EV types in this study – shown by Ekstrom et al., 52 that exosomes/sEVs contain VEGF which is reported to favour angiogenesis, and modulation of adhesion, migration, homing and engraftment. A major finding in our differential MDCK-/21D1-derived MBR proteome study was the unique identification of NT5E (ecto-5′-nucleotidase, or CD73) and the ser/thr kinases LIMK1 and LIMK2 in 21D1-MBRs (not present in MDCK cell derived MBRs). NT5E is an immune checkpoint protein involved in converting ATP into adenosine, promoting immune escape of tumour cells 53 . Xu and colleagues identified CD73 as highly expressed in gastric cancer linked with poor prognosis, identifying CD73 and adenosinergic signalling within the tumour microenvironment: here, CD73 was also shown to be capable of inducing EMT phenotype during gastric cancer metastasis 54 . Additionally, transcriptome analysis revealed that CD73 modulates the RICS/RhoA pathway extracellularly, leading to LIMK/cofilin phosphorylation inhibition and β-catenin activation 54 . Of note, we identify enriched expression of ser/thr kinases LIMK1 in 21D1-MBRs (relative to MDCK); functionality of this ser/thr kinase as part of the Rho family GTPase signal transduction pathway, involved in microtubule stability and actin polymerisation 55 , and various cell fate processes including cancer development, neurological diseases, and viral infections (reviewed 56 ). Importantly, prior studies have identified LIMK1 as a cancer-promoting regulator in multiple organ cancers, such as breast, prostate, and colorectal cancers 57 – 60 . Our proteome analysis of unique proteins associated with only MBRs from mesenchymal cells (relative to MDCK cells and sEVs) demonstrate involvement and enrichment of proteins associated with immune regulation, including interferon signalling (FANCM, TRIM3, IFIT3, TARBP2), genes involved in invasion (GMPR), and cytokine signalling (STAT5A, TNFRSF6B, FANCM, TRIM3, IFIT3, TARBP2) 3 , 61 . In the context of EMT and immunoregulation, whether these molecular MBR cargo can transfer their functionalities to other recipient cells warrants further investigation. In summary, we demonstrate for the first time the large-scale isolation and biophysical/biochemical characterisation of MBRs from MDCK cells following oncogenic H-Ras induced EMT. We highlight distinct proteome signatures between MDCK-/21D1 derived MBRs and exosomes: we show how the MDCK-MBR proteome is extensively reprogrammed following oncogenic H-Ras induced EMT. Our findings demonstrate MBRs as a unique class of EVs – distinct from exosomes - and suggests they may have previously unrecognized roles in cell differentiation, cell polarity and cancer biology. AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS AS, and RJS conceived and designed the study. AS, AR, and RX conducted the experiments. AR and DWG performed all proteomic data generation, bioinformatic analyses and interpreted the data. MC and WS provided intellectual input. DWG and RJS supervised the project and, with AS and AR, wrote the manuscript. CONFLICT OF INTEREST STATEMENT Authors declare no conflicts of interest. Download figure Open in new tab Supp Figure 1. Download figure Open in new tab Supp Figure 2. Download figure Open in new tab ACKNOWLEDMENTS AS and RJS acknowledge funding support from La Trobe University. AS was supported by La Trobe University Post Graduate Scholarship. We acknowledge La Trobe University Comprehensive Proteomics Platform for providing infrastructure. References ↵ Thiery , J. P. , Acloque , H. , Huang , R. Y. & Nieto , M. A . Epithelial-mesenchymal transitions in development and disease . Cell 139 , 871 – 890 , doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2009.11.007 ( 2009 ). OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Web of Science ↵ Brabletz , T. , Kalluri , R. , Nieto , M. A. & Weinberg, R. A. EMT in cancer . Nat Rev Cancer 18 , 128 – 134 , doi: 10.1038/nrc.2017.118 ( 2018 ). OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed ↵ Dongre , A. & Weinberg , R. A . New insights into the mechanisms of epithelial-mesenchymal transition and implications for cancer . Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 20 , 69 – 84 , doi: 10.1038/s41580-018-0080-4 ( 2019 ). OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed ↵ Yang , J. et al. Guidelines and definitions for research on epithelial-mesenchymal transition . Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 21 , 341 – 352 , doi: 10.1038/s41580-020-0237-9 ( 2020 ). OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed ↵ Nieto , M. A . Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transitions in development and disease: old views and new perspectives . Int J Dev Biol 53 , 1541 – 1547 , doi: 10.1387/ijdb.072410mn ( 2009 ). OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Thiery , J. P. & Sleeman , J. P . Complex networks orchestrate epithelial-mesenchymal transitions . Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 7 , 131 – 142 , doi: 10.1038/nrm1835 ( 2006 ). OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Web of Science ↵ Deshmukh , A. P. et al. Identification of EMT signaling cross-talk and gene regulatory networks by single-cell RNA sequencing . Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 118 , doi: 10.1073/pnas.2102050118 ( 2021 ). OpenUrl Abstract / FREE Full Text ↵ Lovisa , S. et al. Epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition induces cell cycle arrest and parenchymal damage in renal fibrosis . Nat Med 21 , 998 – 1009 , doi: 10.1038/nm.3902 ( 2015 ). OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed ↵ Grande , M. T. et al. Snail1-induced partial epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition drives renal fibrosis in mice and can be targeted to reverse established disease . Nat Med 21 , 989 – 997 , doi: 10.1038/nm.3901 ( 2015 ). OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed ↵ Mathias , R. A. et al. Secretome-based proteomic profiling of Ras-transformed MDCK cells reveals extracellular modulators of epithelial-mesenchymal transition . J Proteome Res 8 , 2827 – 2837 , doi: 10.1021/pr8010974 ( 2009 ). OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed ↵ Mathias , R. A. et al. Extracellular remodelling during oncogenic Ras-induced epithelial- mesenchymal transition facilitates MDCK cell migration . J Proteome Res 9 , 1007 – 1019 , doi: 10.1021/pr900907g ( 2010 ). OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Web of Science ↵ Tauro , B. J. et al. Oncogenic H-ras reprograms Madin-Darby canine kidney (MDCK) cell- derived exosomal proteins following epithelial-mesenchymal transition . Mol Cell Proteomics 12 , 2148 – 2159 , doi: 10.1074/mcp.M112.027086 ( 2013 ). OpenUrl Abstract / FREE Full Text ↵ Shafiq , A. et al. Transglutaminase-2, RNA-binding proteins and mitochondrial proteins selectively traffic to MDCK cell-derived microvesicles following H-Ras-induced epithelial- mesenchymal transition . Proteomics 21 , e2000221 , doi: 10.1002/pmic.202000221 ( 2021 ). OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed ↵ Greening , D. W. et al. Emerging roles of exosomes during epithelial-mesenchymal transition and cancer progression . Semin Cell Dev Biol 40 , 60 – 71 , doi: 10.1016/j.semcdb.2015.02.008 ( 2015 ). OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed ↵ Gopal , S. K. et al. Extracellular vesicles: their role in cancer biology and epithelial- mesenchymal transition . Biochem J 474 , 21 – 45 , doi: 10.1042/BCJ20160006 ( 2017 ). OpenUrl Abstract / FREE Full Text ↵ Mathias , R. A. et al. Extracellular Remodelling During Oncogenic Ras-Induced Epithelial- Mesenchymal Transition Facilitates MDCK Cell Migration . Journal of Proteome Research 9 , 1007 – 1019 , doi: 10.1021/pr900907g ( 2010 ). OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Web of Science ↵ Xu , R. et al. Extracellular vesicles in cancer - implications for future improvements in cancer care . Nat Rev Clin Oncol 15 , 617 – 638 , doi: 10.1038/s41571-018-0036-9 ( 2018 ). OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed ↵ Rai , A. et al. Secreted midbody remnants are a class of extracellular vesicles molecularly distinct from exosomes and microparticles . Commun Biol 4 , 400 , doi: 10.1038/s42003-021-01882-z ( 2021 ). OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed ↵ Suwakulsiri , W. et al. Transcriptomic analysis and fusion gene identifications of midbody remnants released from colorectal cancer cells reveals they are molecularly distinct from exosomes and microparticles . Proteomics 24 , e2300058 , doi: 10.1002/pmic.202300058 ( 2024 ). OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed ↵ Buzas , E. I . The roles of extracellular vesicles in the immune system . Nat Rev Immunol 23 , 236 – 250 , doi: 10.1038/s41577-022-00763-8 ( 2023 ). OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed ↵ Suwakulsiri , W. et al. Comparative proteomic analysis of three major extracellular vesicle classes secreted from human primary and metastatic colorectal cancer cells: Exosomes, microparticles, and shed midbody remnants . Proteomics 24 , e2300057 , doi: 10.1002/pmic.202300057 ( 2024 ). OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed ↵ Gopal , S. K. , Greening , D. W. , Zhu , H. J. , Simpson , R. J. & Mathias , R. A . Transformed MDCK cells secrete elevated MMP1 that generates LAMA5 fragments promoting endothelial cell angiogenesis . Sci Rep 6 , 28321 , doi: 10.1038/srep28321 ( 2016 ). OpenUrl CrossRef ↵ Ji , H. et al. Proteome profiling of exosomes derived from human primary and metastatic colorectal cancer cells reveal differential expression of key metastatic factors and signal transduction components . Proteomics 13 , 1672 – 1686 , doi: 10.1002/pmic.201200562 ( 2013 ). OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Web of Science ↵ Rai , A. , et al. A Protocol for Isolation, Purification, Characterization, and Functional Dissection of Exosomes . Methods Mol Biol 2261 , 105 – 149 , doi: 10.1007/978-1-0716-1186-9_9 ( 2021 ). OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed ↵ Suwakulsiri , W. et al. Proteomic profiling reveals key cancer progression modulators in shed microvesicles released from isogenic human primary and metastatic colorectal cancer cell lines . Biochim Biophys Acta Proteins Proteom 1867, 140171 , doi: 10.1016/j.bbapap.2018.11.008 ( 2019 ). OpenUrl CrossRef ↵ Claridge , B. et al. Proteome characterisation of extracellular vesicles isolated from heart . Proteomics 21 , e2100026 , doi: 10.1002/pmic.202100026 ( 2021 ). OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed ↵ Cross , J. , Rai , A. , Fang , H. , Claridge , B. & Greening , D. W . Rapid and in-depth proteomic profiling of small extracellular vesicles for ultralow samples . Proteomics 24 , e2300211 , doi: 10.1002/pmic.202300211 ( 2024 ). OpenUrl CrossRef ↵ Fang , H. et al. Proteomics and Machine Learning-Based Approach to Decipher Subcellular Proteome of Mouse Heart . Mol Cell Proteomics 24 , 100952 , doi: 10.1016/j.mcpro.2025.100952 ( 2025 ). OpenUrl CrossRef ↵ Cross , J. , Rai , A. , Fang , H. , Claridge , B. & Greening , D. W . Rapid and in-depth proteomic profiling of small extracellular vesicles for ultralow samples . Proteomics , e2300211 , doi: 10.1002/pmic.202300211 ( 2023 ). OpenUrl CrossRef ↵ Fang , H. & Greening , D. W . An Optimized Data-Independent Acquisition Strategy for Comprehensive Analysis of Human Plasma Proteome . Methods Mol Biol 2628 , 93 – 107 , doi: 10.1007/978-1-0716-2978-9_7 ( 2023 ). OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed ↵ Demichev , V. , Messner , C. B. , Vernardis , S. I. , Lilley , K. S. & Ralser , M . DIA-NN: neural networks and interference correction enable deep proteome coverage in high throughput . Nat Methods 17 , 41 – 44 , doi: 10.1038/s41592-019-0638-x ( 2020 ). OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed ↵ Yu , G. , Wang , L. G. , Han , Y. & He , Q. Y . clusterProfiler: an R package for comparing biological themes among gene clusters . OMICS 16 , 284 – 287 , doi: 10.1089/omi.2011.0118 ( 2012 ). OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Web of Science ↵ Heberle , H. , Meirelles , G. V. , da Silva , F. R. , Telles , G. P. & Minghim , R . InteractiVenn: a web- based tool for the analysis of sets through Venn diagrams . BMC Bioinformatics 16 , 169 , doi: 10.1186/s12859-015-0611-3 ( 2015 ). OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed ↵ Luo , W. & Brouwer , C . Pathview: an R/Bioconductor package for pathway-based data integration and visualization . Bioinformatics 29 , 1830 – 1831 , doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btt285 ( 2013 ). OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Web of Science ↵ Shapiro , I. M. et al. An EMT-driven alternative splicing program occurs in human breast cancer and modulates cellular phenotype . PLoS Genet 7 , e1002218 , doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1002218 ( 2011 ). OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed ↵ Moreno-Bueno , G. , Portillo , F. & Cano , A . Transcriptional regulation of cell polarity in EMT and cancer . Oncogene 27 , 6958 – 6969 , doi: 10.1038/onc.2008.346 ( 2008 ). OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Web of Science ↵ Kugeratski , F. G. et al. Quantitative proteomics identifies the core proteome of exosomes with syntenin-1 as the highest abundant protein and a putative universal biomarker . Nat Cell Biol 23 , 631 – 641 , doi: 10.1038/s41556-021-00693-y ( 2021 ). OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed ↵ Thery , C. et al. Minimal information for studies of extracellular vesicles 2018 (MISEV2018): a position statement of the International Society for Extracellular Vesicles and update of the MISEV2014 guidelines . J Extracell Vesicles 7 , 1535750 , doi: 10.1080/20013078.2018.1535750 ( 2018 ). OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed ↵ Welsh , J. A. et al. Minimal information for studies of extracellular vesicles (MISEV2023): From basic to advanced approaches . J Extracell Vesicles 13 , e12404 , doi: 10.1002/jev2.12404 ( 2024 ). OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed ↵ Watanabe , T. , Imamura , T. & Hiasa , Y . Roles of protein kinase R in cancer: Potential as a therapeutic target . Cancer Sci 109 , 919 – 925 , doi: 10.1111/cas.13551 ( 2018 ). OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Terry , S. et al. New insights into the role of EMT in tumor immune escape . Mol Oncol 11 , 824 – 846 , doi: 10.1002/1878-0261.12093 ( 2017 ). OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Tseng , P. C. et al. Epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition hinders interferon-gamma-dependent immunosurveillance in lung cancer cells . Cancer Lett 539 , 215712 , doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2022.215712 ( 2022 ). OpenUrl CrossRef ↵ Wang , G. et al. The pan-cancer landscape of crosstalk between epithelial-mesenchymal transition and immune evasion relevant to prognosis and immunotherapy response . NPJ Precis Oncol 5 , 56 , doi: 10.1038/s41698-021-00200-4 ( 2021 ). OpenUrl CrossRef ↵ Hamidi , H. & Ivaska , J . Every step of the way: integrins in cancer progression and metastasis . Nat Rev Cancer 18 , 533 – 548 , doi: 10.1038/s41568-018-0038-z ( 2018 ). OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed ↵ Liu , F. , Wu , Q. , Dong , Z. & Liu , K . Integrins in cancer: Emerging mechanisms and therapeutic opportunities . Pharmacol Ther 247 , 108458 , doi: 10.1016/j.pharmthera.2023.108458 ( 2023 ). OpenUrl CrossRef ↵ Hoshino , A. et al. Tumour exosome integrins determine organotropic metastasis . Nature 527 , 329 – 335 , doi: 10.1038/nature15756 ( 2015 ). OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed ↵ Peterman , E. et al. The post-abscission midbody is an intracellular signaling organelle that regulates cell proliferation . Nat Commun 10 , 3181 , doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-10871-0 ( 2019 ). OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed ↵ Chen , Y. S. et al. Proteomics profiling of Madin-Darby canine kidney plasma membranes reveals Wnt-5a involvement during oncogenic H-Ras/TGF-beta-mediated epithelial- mesenchymal transition . Mol Cell Proteomics 10 , M110 001131 , doi: 10.1074/mcp.M110.001131 ( 2011 ). OpenUrl Abstract / FREE Full Text ↵ Wang , B. , Tang , Z. , Gong , H. , Zhu , L. & Liu , X . Wnt5a promotes epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition and metastasis in non-small-cell lung cancer . Biosci Rep 37 , doi: 10.1042/BSR20171092 ( 2017 ). OpenUrl Abstract / FREE Full Text ↵ Bo , H. et al. Upregulation of Wnt5a promotes epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition and metastasis of pancreatic cancer cells . BMC Cancer 13 , 496 , doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-13-496 ( 2013 ). OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed ↵ Bueno , M. L. P. , Saad , S. T. O. & Roversi , F. M . WNT5A in tumor development and progression: A comprehensive review . Biomed Pharmacother 155 , 113599 , doi: 10.1016/j.biopha.2022.113599 ( 2022 ). OpenUrl CrossRef ↵ Ekstrom , E. J. et al. WNT5A induces release of exosomes containing pro-angiogenic and immunosuppressive factors from malignant melanoma cells . Mol Cancer 13 , 88 , doi: 10.1186/1476-4598-13-88 ( 2014 ). OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed ↵ Beavis , P. A. , Stagg , J. , Darcy , P. K. & Smyth , M. J . CD73: a potent suppressor of antitumor immune responses . Trends Immunol 33 , 231 – 237 , doi: 10.1016/j.it.2012.02.009 ( 2012 ). OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Web of Science ↵ Xu , Z. et al. CD73 promotes tumor metastasis by modulating RICS/RhoA signaling and EMT in gastric cancer . Cell Death Dis 11 , 202 , doi: 10.1038/s41419-020-2403-6 ( 2020 ). OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed ↵ Gorovoy , M. et al. LIM kinase 1 coordinates microtubule stability and actin polymerization in human endothelial cells . J Biol Chem 280 , 26533 – 26542 , doi: 10.1074/jbc.M502921200 ( 2005 ). OpenUrl Abstract / FREE Full Text ↵ Villalonga , E. , et al. LIM Kinases, LIMK1 and LIMK2, Are Crucial Node Actors of the Cell Fate: Molecular to Pathological Features . Cells 12 , doi: 10.3390/cells12050805 ( 2023 ). OpenUrl CrossRef ↵ Bagheri-Yarmand , R. , Mazumdar , A. , Sahin , A. A. & Kumar , R . LIM kinase 1 increases tumor metastasis of human breast cancer cells via regulation of the urokinase-type plasminogen activator system . Int J Cancer 118 , 2703 – 2710 , doi: 10.1002/ijc.21650 ( 2006 ). OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Tapia , T. , Ottman , R. & Chakrabarti , R . LIM kinase1 modulates function of membrane type matrix metalloproteinase 1: implication in invasion of prostate cancer cells . Mol Cancer 10 , 6 , doi: 10.1186/1476-4598-10-6 ( 2011 ). OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Liao , Q. et al. LIM kinase 1 interacts with myosin-9 and alpha-actinin-4 and promotes colorectal cancer progression . Br J Cancer 117 , 563 – 571 , doi: 10.1038/bjc.2017.193 ( 2017 ). OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed ↵ Zhang , Y. et al. Imbalanced LIMK1 and LIMK2 expression leads to human colorectal cancer progression and metastasis via promoting beta-catenin nuclear translocation . Cell Death Dis 9 , 749 , doi: 10.1038/s41419-018-0766-8 ( 2018 ). OpenUrl CrossRef ↵ Chattopadhyay , I. , Ambati , R. & Gundamaraju , R . Exploring the Crosstalk between Inflammation and Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition in Cancer . Mediators Inflamm 2021, 9918379 , doi: 10.1155/2021/9918379 ( 2021 ). OpenUrl CrossRef View the discussion thread. Back to top Previous Next Posted July 21, 2025. Download PDF Email Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about bioRxiv. NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article. Your Email * Your Name * Send To * Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas. You are going to email the following Oncogenic H-Ras Reprograms Madin-Darby Canine Kidney (MDCK) Cell-derived Midbody Remnant Proteins Following Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition Message Subject (Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from bioRxiv Message Body (Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the bioRxiv website. Your Personal Message CAPTCHA This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions. Share Oncogenic H-Ras Reprograms Madin-Darby Canine Kidney (MDCK) Cell-derived Midbody Remnant Proteins Following Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition Adnan Shafiq , Alin Rai , Rong Xu , Maoshan Chen , Wittaya Suwakulsiri , David W. Greening , Richard J. Simpson bioRxiv 2025.07.17.665448; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.07.17.665448 Share This Article: Copy Citation Tools Oncogenic H-Ras Reprograms Madin-Darby Canine Kidney (MDCK) Cell-derived Midbody Remnant Proteins Following Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition Adnan Shafiq , Alin Rai , Rong Xu , Maoshan Chen , Wittaya Suwakulsiri , David W. Greening , Richard J. Simpson bioRxiv 2025.07.17.665448; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.07.17.665448 Citation Manager Formats BibTeX Bookends EasyBib EndNote (tagged) EndNote 8 (xml) Medlars Mendeley Papers RefWorks Tagged Ref Manager RIS Zotero Tweet Widget Facebook Like Google Plus One Subject Area Cell Biology Subject Areas All Articles Animal Behavior and Cognition (7629) Biochemistry (17660) Bioengineering (13881) Bioinformatics (41913) Biophysics (21436) Cancer Biology (18578) Cell Biology (25482) Clinical Trials (138) Developmental Biology (13372) Ecology (19890) Epidemiology (2067) Evolutionary Biology (24302) Genetics (15600) Genomics (22483) Immunology (17728) Microbiology (40365) Molecular Biology (17164) Neuroscience (88540) Paleontology (666) Pathology (2830) Pharmacology and Toxicology (4821) Physiology (7637) Plant Biology (15136) Scientific Communication and Education (2045) Synthetic Biology (4290) Systems Biology (9818) Zoology (2269)
Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below.
Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure
cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can
have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy
(via DOI)
is the canonical version.