Inferring Spatially Varying Bending Stiffness of Biopolymers with Deep-Learning Approach

preprint OA: closed
📄 Open PDF Full text JSON View at publisher
Full text 1,636 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
Abstract The bendability of biopolymers, including DNA, actin filaments, and microtubules, is crucial to diverse biological processes, such as cell motility and cytoskeletal organization. While conventional polymer models like the worm-like chain model assume uniform bending stiffness along the contour, biopolymers in reality often attain spatially varying bending stiffness as a result of complex cellular interactions. For instance, the bending stiffness of actin filaments and microtubules varies in response to associated binding proteins or chemical modifications. Despite its biological implications, measuring the position-dependent persistence length along polymer contours remains challenging. Here, we present a deep-learning-based method that quantitatively predicts spatially varying bending stiffness of biopolymers. Our framework segments a polymer chain into short over-lapping fragments, predicts local persistence lengths using a deep-learning model, and reconstructs full profiles. Using simulated data, we demonstrate that our approach achieves high accuracy and robustness even under data-scarce conditions. Applied to various biological systems, our method reveals a spatially varying stiffness from tip to base in filopodia as well as spatially heterogeneous stiffness in microtubules. Additionally, we investigate the internal mechanism of our deep-learning model and show that the model utilizes multiple physics-related features for persistence length estimation while adaptively adjusting its attention based on polymer stiffness. Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-06-22T06:34:40.717867+00:00