Duration discrimination in the bumblebee Bombus terrestris

preprint OA: closed CC-BY-4.0
📄 Open PDF Full text JSON View at publisher
Full text 1,549 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
Abstract The ability to process temporal information is crucial for animal activities like foraging, mating, and predator avoidance. While circadian rhythms have been extensively studied, there is limited knowledge regarding how insects process durations in the range of seconds and sub-seconds. This study aimed to assess bumblebees’ (Bombus terrestris) ability to differentiate the durations of flashing lights, and use this information in a free-foraging task. Bees were trained to associate either the long or short-duration stimulus with a sugar reward versus an unpalatable solution until reaching a criterion, and then tested without sucrose solution with the same stimuli. In Experiment 1, we tested the ability to discriminate between a long stimulus (2.5 or 5 seconds) vs a short stimulus (0.5 or 1 second). The bees learned to discriminate between the two stimuli. To check whether bees solve the task without using the absolute difference in proximal stimulation as a cue, we ran a second experiment. In Experiment 2, the flashing stimuli were presented for the same total amount of time in a cycle. Bees could discriminate between durations even when the overall amount of stimulation in each presentation cycle was the same. This shows general learning abilities in bumblebees, that can discriminate seconds/subseconds intervals in visual flashing stimuli. This reveals an insect’s ability to use non-naturalistic stimuli and temporal cues in free foraging. Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-05-23T02:00:01.238055+00:00
License: CC-BY-4.0