Acceptability of a physical activity program using a digital tool in the management of endometriosis
This study analyzed the intention of 313 women with endometriosis to use digital physical activity tools, finding that perceived usefulness, ease of use, and favorable social discourse significantly predicted acceptance.
One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works
This study examined women with endometriosis using an online survey to assess intention to use a digital adapted physical activity program, analyzing socio-demographic and medical factors alongside subscales from the HITAM model (via univariate and multivariate logistic regressions). Among 313 respondents (mean age 34.4 years), intention to use the digital physical activity tool was fairly high, particularly when technology was perceived to offer freedom in practice, and the final model explained 57.74% of the variance using perceived threat, norms, perceived ease of use, perceived usefulness, and age. The authors cautioned that findings should be interpreted carefully due to a self-selected sample and a high dropout rate with 899 incomplete responses. This paper is centrally about endometriosis — it specifically studies acceptability and intention to use a digital adapted physical activity program for women with endometriosis.
Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works
Abstract
Full text
5,093 characters
· extracted from
oa-doi-fallback
· 4 sections
· click to expand
Abstract
Materials and methods
Results
Acknowledgements
Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works
Condition tags
MeSH descriptors
Citation neighborhood (no data yet)
We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2026) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.
Source provenance
- europepmc
- last seen: 2026-09-21T06:08:07.822426+00:00
- pubmed
- last seen: 2026-09-24T06:05:21.409911+00:00
- unpaywall
- last seen: 2026-09-24T06:17:16.569905+00:00
Courtesy of the U.S. National Library of Medicine