Therapeutic approach of uterine leiomyoma; choosing the most appropriate surgical option
article
OA: diamond
CC0
AI-generated summary
This review discusses surgical options for uterine leiomyoma, concluding that laparoscopic hysterectomy offers shorter operative times, fewer postoperative complications, and faster recovery than vaginal hysterectomy.
One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works
Abstract
The most common benign pelvic tumor in young women is uterine leiomyoma. It is often asymptomatic, but can cause symptoms such as pelvic-abdominal pain, vaginal bleeding, urinary and intestinal transit disorders. If there is a suspicion of malignancy, it is necessary to perform fractional uterine curettage to establish the histopathological diagnosis. The surgical treatment of uterine leiomyoma includes several procedures: myomectomy, subtotal or total hysterectomy. The procedure will be chosen depending on the patient's particularities: BMI, uterine size, leiomyoma location, surgical history or other associated pathologies. Laparoscopic hysterectomy has a 45-minute shorter duration of intervention than vaginal hysterectomy, and the conversion rate to the open procedure is lower. Laparoscopically treated cases have fewer postoperative complications compared to other surgical procedures and have a shorter hospitalization and recovery time. The recurrence rate of uterine leiomyoma is similar for both laparoscopic and open abdominal approach, and the frequency of long-term complications such as adhesion syndrome or pelvic pain is higher after the latter.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Citation neighborhood (no data yet)
We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.
References (47)
- W628796965 via openalex
- W1528500075 via openalex
- W1643142738 via openalex
- W1964063041 via openalex
- W1968956717 via openalex
- W1969018878 via openalex
- W1977541873 via openalex
- W1979849615 via openalex
- W1988762768 via openalex
- W1988955331 via openalex
- W1993790913 via openalex
- W2001382058 via openalex
- W2021171884 via openalex
- W2030076350 via openalex
- W2044548776 via openalex
- W2047842493 via openalex
- W2049446992 via openalex
- W2053449870 via openalex
- W2064685372 via openalex
- W2071333781 via openalex
- W2084151923 via openalex
- W2084765865 via openalex
- W2086600876 via openalex
- W2091572545 via openalex
- W2091789196 via openalex
- W2113491903 via openalex
- W2140823510 via openalex
- W2143212684 via openalex
- W2151364172 via openalex
- W2157369817 via openalex
- W2163775118 via openalex
- W2179089981 via openalex
- W2222024717 via openalex
- W2314436938 via openalex
- W2408558883 via openalex
- W2462864592 via openalex
- W2557178297 via openalex
- W2595206985 via openalex
- W2612768873 via openalex
- W2736541590 via openalex
- W2960028168 via openalex
- W3128655591 via openalex
- W3154634271 via openalex
- W3157045105 via openalex
- W4244565353 via openalex
- W4254244449 via openalex
- W4324262885 via openalex
Source provenance
- openalex
- last seen: 2026-06-04T00:00:01.174412+00:00
License: CC0
· commercial use OK