Branched-chain amino acid catabolism promotes ovarian cancer cell proliferation via phosphorylation of mTOR

preprint OA: closed CC-BY-NC-ND-4.0
📄 Open PDF Full text JSON View at publisher
Full text 58,677 characters · extracted from oa-pdf · 8 sections · click to expand

Keywords

ovarian cancer, fallopian tube, omental metastasis, branched-chain amino acids, metabolomics, mass spectrometry imaging

Abstract

Ovarian cancer is the sixth leading cause of cancer-related mortality among individuals with ovaries, and high-grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSOC) is the most common and lethal subtype. Characterized by a distinct and aggressive metastatic pattern, HGSOC can originate in the fallopian tube with the transformation of fallopian tube epithelial (FTE) cells, which metastasize to the ovary and subsequently to the omentum and peritoneal cavity. The omentum is a privileged metastatic site, and the metabolic exchange underlying omental metastasis could provide enzyme or receptor targets to block spread. In this study, we adapted a mass spectrometry imaging (MSI) protocol to investigate spatial location of 3D cocultures of tumorigenic FTE cells when grown in proximity to murine omental explants as a model of early metastatic colonization. Our analysis revealed several altered metabolites in tumorigenic FTE/omentum cocultures, namely changes in branched-chain amino acids (BCAA), including valine. We quantified the heightened consumption of valine, other BCAAs, and other amino acid-derived metabolites in omental cocultures using LC-MS assays. Our analysis revealed that metabolite concentrations when monitored with MSI from cell culture media in living culture systems have notable considerations for how MSI data may produce signatures that induce ionization suppression. Supplementation with valine enhanced proliferation and mTOR signaling in tumorigenic FTE cells, suggesting the potential of BCAA’s as a nutrient utilized by tumor cells during omental colonization and a possible target for metastasis. SIGNIFICANCE: This study uncovers altered amino acid metabolism, specifically increased BCAA catabolism, at the interface of ovarian cancer cells and omental tissue in a coculture model of HGSOC secondary metastasis. Enhanced BCAA catabolism may promote cancer cell proliferation through mTOR signaling, presenting potential therapeutic value. These findings deepen our understanding of HGSOC pathogenesis and the metastatic tumor microenvironment, offering insights for developing new treatment strategies. .CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseavailable under a (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted October 18, 2024. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.10.15.618560doi: bioRxiv preprint 2

Introduction

Ovarian cancer (OvC) is the most lethal gynecologic malignancy.(1) Projections indicate that in 2024, the United States will see 19, 680 new cases and 12,740 deaths attributed to OvC.(1) Despite the term 'ovarian cancer' implying a singular condition, it encompasses several histologically distinct subtypes; among them, high-grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSOC) is the most prevalent and lethal.(2) HGSOC poses challenges in diagnosis due to non-specific symptoms and the absence of efficient screening methods.(2–4) Due to a lack of routine screening, approximately 80% of cases remain undetected until reaching metastatic stages, when the five-year survival rate drops below 30%.(2,3,5) This data underscores the need to investigate the molecular events driving HGSOC pathogenesis to facilitate the discovery of untapped therapeutic targets. The metastatic behavior of HGSOC suggests that the omentum is a unique metastatic location, with omental metastases observed in approximately 80% of cases.(6,7) Several studies provide evidence for an "activated" phenotype of the peritoneal microenvironment associated with OvC, suggesting that chemical messengers specifically account for the preferential spread of fallopian tube derived HGSOC to the omental tissues during metastasis. The omentum is comprised of a variety of cell types, including adipocytes, fibroblasts, and macrophages, which can be dynamically converted to "cancer-associated" phenotypes, which is a process known to play a roles in disease progression.(8–10) For example, following co-culture with OvC cells, activated omental adipocytes have been shown to enhance the secretion of various adipokines, thus facilitating OvC dissemination.(7) A study by Rizi et al. demonstrated that cancer-associated adipocytes can also release arginine, which OvC cells may uptake, leading to increased nitric oxide production. Consequently, OvC cells release citrulline, a byproduct of nitric oxide synthase activity, which promotes adipogenesis in adipocytes.(11) Furthermore, cancer-associated adipocytes have been reported to transfer fatty acids to OvC cells, thereby promoting β -oxidation and energy generation which ultimately drives metastatic growth.(7) OvC cells also secrete soluble metabolites and microRNA that induce metabolic reprogramming in fibroblasts, prompting the acquisition of cancer-associated phenotypes. For instance, a study by Jeon et al. unveiled that lysophosphatidic acid, found in the malignant ascites of advanced-stage OvC patients, triggers the differentiation of adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells into cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs).(12) Bidirectional interactions between OvC cells and CAFs have been reported in several studies.(13,14) In one such study, Wang et al. showed that CAFs confer platinum resistance to OvC cells by releasing glutathione and cysteine into the peritoneal microenvironment.(15) This finding is significant, as the standard ovarian cancer treatment includes surgical tumor removal followed by platinum- based chemotherapy.(16) While we have some knowledge about the role secreted local factors play in omental colonization (14,17), the role of secreted metabolites, their spatial resolution, and their quantification has typically not been studied utilizing an untargeted label-free approach to detect the chemical cues driving this critical step in metastasis. Mass spectrometry imaging (MSI) is a useful tool for visualizing the spatial distribution of metabolites in biological samples.(18,19) Our lab previously developed an MSI protocol for analyzing 3D cocultures of explant murine tissues .CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseavailable under a (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted October 18, 2024. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.10.15.618560doi: bioRxiv preprint 3 and mammalian cells and discovered and validated the presence of norepinephrine as a chemoattractant released from the ovary.(20,21) Further, our labs demonstrated that norepinephrine releas e was partially mediated by SPARC and impacted survival in a murine model.(22,23) In this present study, we adapted our MSI technique for use with omental tissue to investigate metabolic exchange in secondary metastasis. MSI analysis of 3D omental cocultures led to the identification of several signals that appeared to be altered in tumorigenic conditions. MSI on cocultures in a divided chamber format revealed the site of origin of these signals, with some signals originating from tumorigenic FTE cells and others originating from omental tissue. Further analytical validation of m/z 118 revealed that it represented the branched-chain amino acid (BCAA) valine. Quantification of BCAAs and 21 other amino acids in coculture extracts demonstrated that valine and other BCAAs are actually consumed at higher levels in tumorigenic FTE/omentum cocultures compared to either condition alone or a non-tumorigenic fallopian tube cell model. Analysis of valine standard curves via MSI illust rated that the increase in signal observed was attributed to ion suppression, owing to the high concentration of valine in the media. Proliferation assays revealed that valine supplementation increases the proliferation of tumorigenic FTE cells, and immunoblotting showed that valine can stimulate the phosphorylation of mTOR. This work demonstrates the benefit of exploring spatial metabolic changes in cancer metastasis.

Materials and methods

1. Mouse colony and omentum removal All animals were treated in accordance with NIH Guidelines for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals and the established Institutional Animal Use and Care protocol at the University of Illinois Chicago. Omental tissue was collected from female CD-1 mice 6-8 weeks in age (Charles River). Mice were housed in a temperature and light-controlled environment (12 hours light and 12 hours dark) and provided food and water ad libitum . Omentums were removed immediately after sacrifice and bisected using a dissecting microscope (Leica MZ6). 2. Cell lines Dr. Barbara Vanderhyden from the University of Ottawa generously provided spontaneously immortalized murine ovarian surface epithelial (MOSE) cells and murine oviductal epithelial cells (MOE), which are equivalent to human FTE. These MOE cells were modified in our lab to express different genetic variations, including a scrambled control shRNA (MOE SCR shRNA) and an shRNA targeting the PTEN gene (MOE PTEN shRNA), in which case the reduction of PTEN induces tumorigenic phenotype.(24) MOSE cells were cultured in α MEM (MT10022CV, Fisher) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS, 21G267, Sigma-Aldrich), 2 mM L-glutamine (TCG0063, VWR), 10 mg/mL ITS (11074547001, Sigma-Aldrich), 1.8 ng/mL EGF (100-15, Peprotech Inc.), 100 U/mL penicillin-streptomycin (15140-122, Gibco), and 1 mg/mL gentamycin (30-005-CR, CellGro). The MOE cell lines (SCR shRNA and PTEN shRNA) were maintained in similar media but with the addition of 18.2 ng/mL estradiol-17β (E1024, Sigma-Aldrich) and selection antibiotics. 3. Coculture incubation for downstream MSI analyses .CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseavailable under a (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted October 18, 2024. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.10.15.618560doi: bioRxiv preprint 4 Low melting agarose (2%, A9414, Sigma-Aldrich) was liquified from a solid at 70 /i3 . Cells maintained in α MEM media in T-75 flasks were ri nsed with PBS (16777, VWR) and detached using 1 x trypsin (25200072, Life Technologies). Detached cells were transferred to 10 mL α MEM media and counted using an automated cell counter (Accuris E7500 QuadCount™). Aliquots of cells in α MEM were transferred to centrifuge tubes and centrifuged for 5 minutes at 900 rpm (Eppendorf 5804 R Benchtop Centrifuge). After removing the α MEM media, cell pellets were resuspended in 2x DMEM media (D5523, Sigma-Aldrich) supplemented with 10% FBS and 2x penicillin-s treptomycin to a concentration of 333 ce lls/µL. These cell suspensions were mixed 1:1 with 2% agarose to yield a final cell concentration of 166 cells/µL in 1% agarose and 1x DMEM media. Halved omental explants were placed in the corner of wells in an 8-well chamber (177445, Lab-Tek) attached to an ITO-coated glass slide (8237001, Bruker Daltonics). Each condition (300 µL) was plated into a well, ensuring the tissue remained in the corner of the well. For the divided chamber layout, a removable plastic divider was placed diagonally across each well.(20,21) Cells in agarose were plated first (150 µL) on one side of the divider. After the agarose solidified, the divider was removed, and tissue in agarose (150 µL) was plated on the other side. Slides were placed in a humidified incubator at 37°C and 5% CO 2 and cocultured for 4 days. After 4 days, the 8-well chamber was detached from the glass slide, and omental tissue was removed with a razor blade prior to desiccation. Agarose cocultures were desiccated on the ITO-glass slide in an incubator at 30 /i3 on a home-built spinning apparatus for 4 hours.(25) 4. Matrix application MALDI matrices α -cyano-4-hydroxycinnamic acid (CHCA (98%), C2020, Sigma-Aldrich) and 2,5-dihydroxybenzoic acid (DHB (98%), 149357, Sigma-Aldrich) were recrystallized in- house as previously described.(21) The MALDI matrix used for MSI was a 50:50 mixture of CHCA:DHB at 10 mg/mL dissolved in 90:10 ACN:H 2O with 0.1% TFA applied using a TM sprayer™ (HTX Imaging). 5. MSI analysis Before MSI analysis, slides were scanned using Tissue Scout (Bruker Daltonics) for the initial screen and Epson Perfection V850 Pro for subsequent experiments. Scanned images were used to guide irradiation. MSI data was acquired using timsControl v2.0.51.0_9669_1571 and flexImaging 5.1 software for the initial screen, fleximaging 7.4 for subsequent experiments at 100 μ m spatial resolution on a timsTOF fleX mass spectrometer (Bruker Daltonics). Data were collected using a mass range of 50-1500 Da in positive ion mode with the laser width set to 100 μ m imaging and the laser power set to 90%. At each raster point, 1,000 laser shots were delivered at a frequency of 1,000 Hz. The instrument was calibrated manually using phosphorus red prior to imaging. MSI data was analyzed, and statistical analysis was performed using SCiLS™ Lab version 2023c core (Bruker Daltonics). All spectra were normalized to the root mean square (RMS). These data are available at MassIVE under accession number MSV000095459. 6. Extraction of 3D cocultures for signal validation and quantification .CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseavailable under a (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted October 18, 2024. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.10.15.618560doi: bioRxiv preprint 5 Cocultured agarose plugs were dried in vacuo and macerated with a sterile toothpick prior to extraction with 4 mL 50:50 DMF:H 2O with 0.1% FA. Samples were sonicated for 1 hour before the extract was filtered through a 0.2 µM nylon filter (09719C, Fisher), and the supernatant was dried in vacuo. 7. MALDI-MS/MS of coculture extracts Coculture extracts were normalized by dry weight and resuspended in 50:50 MeOH:H 2O at 1 mg/mL. Valine analytical standard (BP397, Fisher Biotech) was prepared at a concentration of 0.1 mg/mL in 50:50 MeOH:H2O. Extracts and analytical standards were mixed 1:1 with CHCA matrix (40 mg/mL in 78:22 ACN:H 2O with 0.1% TFA) and spotted on an MTP target plate (8280784, Bruker Daltonics). MALDI-MS/MS data was acquired using timsControl v2.0.51.0_9669_1571 on a timsTOF fleX mass spectrometer (Bruker Daltonics). Data were collected using a mass range of 50-650 Da in positive ion mode with the laser width set to 100 µM using an M5 defocus laser. The laser power was set to 60%. At each raster point, 200 laser shots were delivered at a frequency of 1,000 Hz. The collision energy (CE) used for fragmentation was 20 eV. The instrument was calibrated manually using phosphorus red prior to analysis. Data were analyzed using DataAnalysis version 6.1 (Bruker Daltonics). 8. LC-MS analysis using aTRAQ kit to quantify amino acids Coculture extracts were resuspended in H 2O at 1 mg/mL, and amino acids were quantified using an aTRAQ kit for amino acid analysis of physiological fluids (Sciex). Coculture extracts (10 µL) were derivatized using the protocol and reagents specified by the kit, dried in vacuo, and resuspended in 30 µL H 2O.(26,27) Reverse-phase LC was performed on an Elute UPLC (Bruker Daltonics) using an amino acid analyzer C18 column (5 µm, 4.6 mm x 150 mm, 4374841, Sciex) with a sample injection volume of 2 µL. The mobile phase consisted of A (H 2O with 0.1% FA and 0.01% hepatofluorobutyric acid (HFBA)) and B (ACN with 0.1% FA and 0.01% HFBA) with a flow rate of 0.4 mL/min. The gradient began with 2% B and was linearly increased to 40% B over 12 minutes; 40% B was held for 8 minutes, then 40% B was linearly increased to 90% B over 2 minutes. The column was washed with 90% B for 2 minutes before linearly decreasing to 2% B over 2 minutes. The column was re-equilibrated with 2% B for 10 minutes. The temperature of the column oven was 50 /i3 . MS spectra were collected using a timsTOF fleX mass spectrometer (Bruker Daltonics) in positive ion mode with a mass range of 50-850 Da and a spectra rate of 4 Hz. Prior to analysis, the instrument was calibrated using 0.5 mM sodium formate. All samples were analyzed in three biological replicates (N=3). A normalized response was calculated using the ratio of the area under the curve (AUC) of the analyte peak to the internal standard peak. The concentration of amino acids in coculture extracts was determined by multiplying this normalized response by the concentration of the corresponding internal standard for each amino acid. Since samples were diluted 3x prior to analysis, this result was multiplied by 3 to determine concentrations in the original 1 mg/mL extract. These data are available at MassIVE under accession number MSV000095455. 9. Proliferation assay Cells were plated at a density of 1000 cells per 100 µL in 96-well plates. Cells were allowed to attach to the plate for 24 hours prior to treatment. Plates were fixed with 20% Trichloroacetic acid on days 0, 1, 3, and 5. Cell viability was then determined using 0.04% sulforhodamine B (SRB) via colorimetric detection at 505 nm.(28) Data was normalized to day 0. 10. Immunoblotting .CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseavailable under a (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted October 18, 2024. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.10.15.618560doi: bioRxiv preprint 6 250,000 cells were seeded into 6 well plates and left to grow for 24 hours prior to treatment. Cells were removed via trypsin-EDTA, spun down, and resuspended for lysis in RIPA buffer (50 mM Tris pH 7.6, 150mM NaCl, 1% Triton X-100, 0.1% SDS) with protease (04693159001, Roche) and phosphatase inhibitors (524625, Millipore Sigma). Protein concentration was determined by Bradford (5000006, Bio-Rad). Protein lysate (30 μ g) was loaded onto an SDS-PAGE gel and transferred to a nitrocellulose membrane. Blots were blocked with 5% BSA in TBS-T and probed at 4°C overnight with primary antibodies, washed thrice, incubated with secondary antibody for 30 minutes, washed thrice, and then developed as described previously.(29) Primar y antibodies were utilized at a concentration of 1:1000 and included the following: mTOR (CST 2983), p-mTOR (CST 2971), p70S6K (CST 9202), p- p70S6K (CST 9234) and GAPDH (CST 2118). Secondary antibody was anti-rabbit and HRP- linked (7074S, Cell Signaling) and used at a concentration of 1:10,000.

Results

MSI coculture adaptation for use with omental tissue While our MSI method was originally envisioned as a plug-and-play technique that could be adapted to many biological cell cultures and organoid cultures, adaptation of this protocol for use with omental tissue was necessary. Matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization (MALDI)- MSI requires a flat sample (30,31), and due to its fatty nature, omental tissue does not dry flat but crystalizes in heat when desiccated (Figure S1). To address this inconsistent omental crystallization, we placed the tissue in the corner of the 8-well chamber, rather than the center as we have previously reported with murine ovary explants, and removed the omental tissue from cocultured agarose plugs prior to sample desiccation and MSI analysis (Figure 1A). We confirmed that the omental tissue is viable after four days of incubation in agarose (Figure S2). Initial MSI screen revealed several signals increased in tumorigenic FTE cell/omentum coculture, and the origin of these signals We chose to utilize a murine oviductal epithelial (MOE) cell line with an shRNA targeting the PTEN gene (MOE PTEN shRNA) as our tumorigenic FTE cell model since we have previously demonstrated that silencing PTEN was sufficient to drive colonization of both the ovary and the omentum in vivo using athymic mice.(32) This model is advantageous because the omental tissue and FTE cells are from the same species, eliminating species differences. In the experimental design for the initial screen, we included several controls, including a MOE cell line expressing a scrambled control shRNA (MOE SCR shRNA) to test for cells that are not tumorigenic, a murine ovarian surface epithelial (MOSE) cell line to test for cell specificity, and a media negative control. Each condition was cultured alone and cocultured with omental tissue (Figure 1A). Samples were incubated for 4 days to allow interaction to occur prior to imaging (N=3). Samples were analyzed using a MALDI-quadrupole time-of-flight (MALDI-QqTOF) mass spectrometer. .CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseavailable under a (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted October 18, 2024. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.10.15.618560doi: bioRxiv preprint 7 Figure 1: MSI analysis shows several signals specific to tumorigenic FTE cell/omentum coculture condition. A) Illustration of imaging layout on the slide for untargeted analysis which includes tumorigenic FTE cells (MOE PTENshRNA) and non-tumorigenic controls. B) Ion images of 4 representative signals upregulated in the HGSOC condition specific to the PTEN mutation (N=3). C) Illustration of divided well layout to identify the origin of signals. D) Signals in B are replicated when cells and omentum are physically separated in agarose. Signals at m/z 118, m/z 140, and m/z 156 originate from tumorigenic FTE cells, while the signal at m/z 184 originates from omental tissue. These signals are statistically significant compared to MOE PTENshRNA + omentum (p < 0.05). The original MSI screen yielded over 25 signals specific to the tumorigenic FTE cell/omentum coculture condition, of which four representative signals are depicted in Figure 1B and replicated in Figure S3-S4. These signals were determined to be significant ly increased (p <0.05) using the MSI data analysis software SciLS when comparing MOE PTEN shRNA + omentum against all other conditions including scrambled + omentum.(33) Additional MSI using a divided ch amber coculture format (Figure 1C) revealed the origin of signals and confirms signals that accumulate due to secretion in agarose without direct physical contact between the cells and the tissue. Three signals ( m/z 118, m/z 140, and m/z 156) were found to be produced by tumorigenic FTE cells alone, while one signals ( m/z 184) wase found to be produced by omental tissue based on the spatial distribution (Figure 1D and S5). Signals were putatively 7 ic E B (p + ng s he ed by ly .CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseavailable under a (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted October 18, 2024. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.10.15.618560doi: bioRxiv preprint 8 annotated by searching for metabolites that matched the experimental monoisotopic mass in the Human Metabolome Database (HMDB, Table 1).(34,35) It is worth noting that all assignments are designated as putative due to the nature of the ppm error achieved from our MSI samples. It is a well-documented effect that the slight surface heterogeneity and added height from the glass slides contributes to the higher mass errors observed. Putative annotations for these signals suggested alterations in amino acid metabolism and the potential induction of catecholamine signaling in cocultures (Table 1). Valine and histidine are both essential amino acids and epinephrine is a catecholamine neurotransmitter.(36) Table 1: Putative annotations and ppm error. Signals (m/z) identified in the initial MSI screen and putative annotations based on the adduct and searching the expected monoisotopic mass in the human metabolome database (HMDB).(36) Ppm error was calculated based on the measured accurate mass and the calculated exact mass of putatively annotated metabolites in their observed adduct form. Valine annotation was confirmed using tandem mass spectrometry While we were able to identify spatially interesting signals and determine their relative abundance using MSI, we were unable to obtain high-quality fragmentation patterns directly from the MSI sample due to low overall signal intensity and ion suppression within the agarose culture. To obtain fragmentation patterns, metabolites were extracted from agarose cocultures using organic solvents, and the extracts were resuspended at 1 mg/mL (Figure S6A). Extracts were then analyzed alongside commercial standards of putatively identified metabolites using the dried droplet method for MALDI-MS/MS (Figure S6A). The fragmentation pattern for m/z 118 in the tumorigenic FTE cell/omentum coculture matched the fragmentation pattern from L-valine (Figure S6B), thus confirming the putative annotation with level 2 confidence.(37,38) Amino acids quantified using LC-MS showed BCAA catabolism is increased in tumorigenic FTE cell/omentum cocultures To orthogonally validate putative annotations and further probe alterations in amino acid metabolism, amino acids in coculture extracts (N=3) were quantified using an aTRAQ kit (Sciex) with LC-MS analysis.(26,27) Overall, we could detect and quantify 24 amino acids by retention time matching with internal standards. Thus, each amino acid was identified with level 1 confidence (Table S1).(37) Serine was significantly decreased (p < 0.05) in the tumorigenic FTE cell/omentum condition compared to the DMEM control. (Figure 2D). Interestingly, data regarding valine and other BCAAs, including leucine and isoleucine, revealed decreased levels MSI Signal (Observed) Putative Adduct Exact mass (calc) Putative annotation ppm error m/z 118.0918 [M+H]+ 118.0863 Da Valine 46.6 m/z 140.0735 [M+Na]+ 140.0682 Da Valine 37.8 m/z 156.0470 [M+H]+ 156.0768 Da Histidine -190.99 m/z 184.0775 [M+H]+ 184.0968 Da Epinephrine -104.8 .CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseavailable under a (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted October 18, 2024. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.10.15.618560doi: bioRxiv preprint 9 in the tumorigenic FTE cell/omentum condition compared to media alone (Figure 2A-C). (39) The aTRAQ kit is capable of quantifying 44 different amino acids and amino acid derivatives; of these, 24 we re detected and quantified in coculture extracts, and 20 were not detected (Table S2 and Figure S7). Figure 2: LC- MS data shows increased consumption of BCAA’s and serine, a trend toward increasing glutamic acid and no change in histidine concentration. LC-MS results from the analysis of 3D agarose coculture extracts using aTRAQ kit to determine concentrations of A) valine, B) isoleucine, C) leucine, and D) serine E) histidine in extracts resuspended at 1 mg/mL. Significance was determined using a one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s post hoc and a cutoff value of 0.05. Analysis of the valine calibration curve using MSI shows evidence of ion suppression Based on the aforementioned results, we tested the hypothesis that ion suppression caused the apparent ‘increase’ in valine levels in tumorigenic FTE/omentum cocultures (Figure 1B, Figure S3), while our quantitative LC- MS data showed a decrease (Figure 2A). Ion suppression is a type of matrix effect where certain metabolites are inhibited from being ionized and, cons equently, remain undetected. This phenomenon can arise due to various factors, including the presence of highly abundant metabolites that compete for ionization.(40) As a result, some metabolites may e xhibit a linear response, with their signal intensity increasing as concentrations rise until reaching a threshold. Beyond that threshold, the signal intensity begins to decrease with further increases in concentration. 9 9) of le rd is e, ed on re on ed rs, a as ns .CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseavailable under a (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted October 18, 2024. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.10.15.618560doi: bioRxiv preprint 10 The media used for mammalian cell c ulture is supplemented with high concentrations of amino acids, including L-valine at a concentration of 800 µM. We hypothesized that this high concentration of L -valine may induce ion suppression, and the consumption of L-valine in tumorigenic FTE/omentum cocultures may alleviate ion suppression, thereby leading to increased signal observed in MSI. We tested this hypothesis using standard curves with known concentrations of a valine analytical standard spiked into agarose. The first standard curve had concentrations of 800 µM, 400 µM, 80 µM, 8 µM, 0.8 µM, and 0.08 µM valine. MSI analysis revealed that no signal was observed from 800 µM to 80 µM, and the highest signal intensity for m/z 118 was observed at the 8 µM concentra tion. Below the 8 µM concentration, the signal intensity dropped off, a result that is consistent with our hypothesis (Figure 3A). For further confirmation, we analyzed a second standard curve with a 4 x serial dilution of 20 µM valine. Again, the signal i ntensity was low at the 20 µM concentration, peaked at the 5 µM concentration, and decreased at concentrations lower than 5 µM. The intermediate concentrations, at 10 µM and 2.5 µM, showed similar signal intensities for m/z 118, providing additional confid ence that our hypothesis was confirmed (Figure 3A). We noted that histidine also had a similar aTRAQ trend but was not significantly altered and subsequently does not suffer from ion suppression (Figure 3B). Figure 3: Ion suppression tests for select amino acids in cell culture media. A) Ion images showing signal m/z 118.09 with different concentrations of a valine analytical standard spiked into agarose. Standard curve 1 shows concentrations ranging from 800 µM to 0.08 µM, while standard curve 2 shows concentrations ranging from 20 µM to 1.25 µM. DMEM media contains 800 µM L-valine. B) Ion images showing signal m/z 156.07 with different concentrations of a histidine analytical standard spiked into agarose. Standard curve 1 shows concentrations ranging from 200 µM to 0.005 µM, while standard curve 2 shows concentrations ranging from 20 µM to 0.2 µM. DMEM media contains 200 µM L-histidine. Valine supplementation leads to increased pro liferation and phosphorylation of mTOR in tumorigenic FTE cell cultures BCAAs are essential amino acids that mammalian cells cannot synthesize, so cancer cells likely acquire them through protein degradation or from the tumor microenvironment 10 of gh in to n ad is for al er e. M te ng ne ot ng e. ws es to ve in er nt .CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseavailable under a (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted October 18, 2024. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.10.15.618560doi: bioRxiv preprint 11 (TME). These amino acids play a fundamental role as building blocks for protein synthe sis. They can be metabolized into branched-chain /i1 -keto acids (BCKAs) within the cytosol by branched-chain amino acid transaminase 1 (BCAT1) or within the mitochondria by branched - chain amino acid transaminase 2 (BCAT2).(39) This process involves the conversion of α - ketoglutarate ( α -KG) to glutamate. BCAAs may also serve as nitrogen sources for the biosynthesis of nucleotides and non-essential amino acids through the glutamate- glutamine axis.(39) Additionally, they can be catabolized to produce acetyl-CoA and succinyl- CoA, which are utilized in the TCA cycle, thereby contributing to ener gy production.(39) The BCAA leucine is a well-known mechanistic target of rapamycin (mTOR) agonist, and studies indicate that other BCAA’s may also be capable of activating mTOR signaling.(41,42) mTOR functio ns, in part, by regulating the phosphorylation of p70 S6 kinase (p70S6k).(43) This signaling pathway regulates proliferation and is often activated in tumors.(44) We sought to characterize the impact of valine supplementation on proliferation and mTOR signaling in tumorigenic FTE cells, as BCAAs are known to stimulate mTOR and proliferation in other cell types (Figure 4A). We evaluated the proliferation in media supplemented with 800 µM (0.8 mM, standard DMEM concentration) and 1.6 mM valine. We evaluated the phosphorylation of mTOR in 1.6 mM valine- supplemented media after 24 hours by western blot. The results show that the phosphorylation of mTOR increased with 1.6 mM valine supplementation (Figure 4B- C), indicating that valine can stimulate the phosphorylation of mTOR in tumorigenic FTE cells. We also found that there was a significant increase in proliferation of tumorigenic MOE PTEN shRNA cells (at day 5) and MOE PTENshRNA p53 R273H cells (day 3) when treated with 1.6 mM valine- supplemented media compared to DMEM (Figure 4D). This data indicates that 1.6 mM valine supplementation increases the proliferation of tumorigenic FTE cells. Figure 4: Valine supplementation increases the proliferation of tumorigenic FTE cells and activates mTOR signaling. A) Schematic of mTOR activation by BCAA. B) Representative western blot showing increased phosphorylation of mTOR with 1.6 mM valine supplementation in MOE PTENshRNA and 11 is. by - - he ne ch ne er by es ne re he nd ed R an as E ia on nd lot nd .CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseavailable under a (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted October 18, 2024. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.10.15.618560doi: bioRxiv preprint 12 MOE PTENshRNA p53R273H. C) Quantification of western blot (N=3). D) SRB proliferation data from MOE PTENshRNA and MOE PTENshRNA p53R273H cells supplemented with 1.6 mM valine supplementation.

Discussion

In this study, we adapted our MSI protocol to investigate metabolic alterations at the interface of tumorigenic FTE cells and omental tissue to elucidate the chemical cues involved in secondary metastasis. Our analysis showed that several signals were elevated in tumorigenic FTE cell/omentum cocultures compared to the controls. Based on our initial screens, putative annotations suggested that amino acid metabolism was perturbed at this coculture interface. Notably, the signal at m/z 118 was confirmed to represent the BCAA valine, and subsequent quantitative LC-MS analysis revealed increased BCAA catabolism. We attributed the discrepancy between MSI and LC-MS results to ion suppression resulting from high concentrations of valine in the media. Furthermore, proliferation assays demonstrated that valine supplementation promotes the proliferation of tumorigenic FTE cells, and immunoblotting showed an increase in the phosphorylation of mTOR in two cell lines. Previous research has highlighted the role of amino acids in interactions between OvC cells and omental tissue.(11,15) In our quantitative assay, both glutamine and asparagine were elevated in conditions involving omental tissue (Figure S7). Since the omentum was removed prior to extraction, the increased presence compared to media alone implies their secretion by omental tissue. Glutamine is a vital nutrient for cancer cell survival, especially under metabolic stress conditions;(45) it has been shown to bolster proliferation by activating mTOR and contribute to resistance to chemotherapy in OvC.(41,46–50) Studies indicate that asparagine can sustain cancer cell survival when glutamine is scarce.(51) Previous research suggests that cancer cells may acquire asparagine from the TME through release by CAFs, and similar to glutamine, asparagine has been shown to stimulate mTOR signaling.(48,51,52) Another intriguing finding is the significant decrease in serine and methionine levels in tumorigenic FTE cocultures compared to healthy FTE controls (Figure S7). Both serine and methionine play roles in one-carbon metabolism, providing 1-carbon units for DNA-histone methylation.(53) Serine is also involved in glutathione biosynthesis, a metabolite previously reported to be increased in the OvC TME.(53–55) Surprisingly, although histidine was identified as a putative MSI signal, it was found to be decreased in omental conditions with no difference in tumorigenic FTE compared to healthy FTE (Figure S7). We did not observe increases in the levels of arginine or citrulline, which a previous study reported being secreted into the OvC TME.(11,15) The most notable discovery from our quantitative LC-MS data is the heightened consumption of valine and other BCAAs, which contradicted the MSI results. The discrepancy between MALDI-MSI and LC-MS outcomes was ascribed to a phenomenon known as ion suppression. Ion suppression is a well-known phenomenon that can reduce signal in both MALDI-MSI and LC-MS.(40,56) In mass spectrometry, the molecular complexity of a sample affects the desorption and ionization of metabolites within it.(56) At elevated concentrations, certain metabolites hinder their own ionization, causing signal intensity to rise until reaching a threshold concentration, beyond which it decreases. Through valine standard curves, we determined that the increase in signal observed in MSI was due to the .CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseavailable under a (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted October 18, 2024. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.10.15.618560doi: bioRxiv preprint 13 relief of ion suppression resulting from valine consumption in tumorigenic FTE/omentum cocultures. By extracting metabolites from omental cocultures and diluting them to 1 mg/mL, we reduced the sample complexity and valine concentration in LC-MS samples, thereby mitigating ion suppression. This discovery holds significant implications for future MSI investigations; when a metabolite of interest is known to have a high concentration in the media, researchers should consider analyzing a standard curve to assess the impact of ion suppression. Furthermore, this underscores the importance of orthogonally validating MSI results. The catabolism of valine and other BCAAs was observed to be higher in tumorigenic FTE cell/omentum cocultures compared to media alone conditions. Notably, while the difference in BCAA levels between tumorigenic FTE and healthy FTE cocultures was not statistically significant in extracts by LC-MS, MSI data in a divided chamber format revealed a more pronounced effect in cells closely situated to omental tissue. This observation suggests that the increased BCAA catabolism results from an interaction. Additionally, this finding may elucidate why the effect was not significant in coculture extracts of whole agarose plugs, as many cells within the coculture are distant from the omentum and may not experience this interaction. Elevated BCAA catabolism in OvC is substantiated by previous studies demonstrating increased expression of the BCAA catabolic enzyme BCAT1 in HGSOC.(57,58) Knockdown of BCAT1 has been shown to repress growth, supporting its significance in cancer progression.(57,58) In a study by Zhang and Han, elevated levels of BCAT1 were found to stimulate proliferation and mTOR activity in breast cancer.(59) These findings are consistent with our proliferation data, which showed that valine supplementation increased proliferation and the phosphorylation of mTOR in tumorigenic FTE cell cultures. When hyperactivated, mTOR signaling promotes cell proliferation and metabolism that aids in tumor progression; mTOR signaling is enhanced in various types of cancer, and inhibition of this pathway is a promising therapeutic target.(60)

Conclusion

Our study sheds light on the metabolic dynamics implicated in the secondary metastasis of HGSOC to the omentum. Using MSI analysis, we uncovered alterations in amino acid metabolism and observed an increase in BCAA catabolism at the interface of OvC cells and omental tissue. This heightened BC AA catabolism may facilitate in creased proliferation of OvC cells through mTOR phosphorylation at the omentum/cancer cell interface. Moving forward, our research will focus on investigating other MSI si gnals and metabolites identified in this study, as well as delving into the molecular mechanisms underlying the observed increase in BCAA catabolism at this interface. By elucidating the intricate interplay of chemical cues involved in secondary metastasis, our findings enhance our understanding of OvC pathogenesis and hold promise for the development of novel therapeutic strategies targeting the metastatic TME in HGSOC. ASSOCIATED CONTENT Supporting Information .CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseavailable under a (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted October 18, 2024. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.10.15.618560doi: bioRxiv preprint 14 The supporting information is available free of charge. Author Information Corresponding Author *Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of California Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA, 95064; [email protected]. *Department of Pharmaceutical Sc iences, College of Pharmacy, Un iversity of Illinois Chicago, Chicago, IL, 60607; [email protected]. Author Contributions The manuscript was written with contributions from all authors. All authors have given approval to the final version of the manuscript. Acknowledgments Figure 1A, Figure 1C, and Figure 4A were created with BioRender.com Funding Sources This work is supported in part by the National Institute of Health grant R01 CA240423 (JB and LS), the Laura Crandall Brown Foundation Ovarian Cancer Early Detection Research Grant from the Foundation for Women’s Cancer supported by the Laura Crandall Brown Foundation (to LS and J B). HL was supported by NIH R01 CA240423-03S1, and NIH F30 CA260791 supported TB. Abbreviations OvC, ovarian cancer; HGSOC, high-grade serous ovarian cancer; FTE, fallopian tube epithelial; CAF, cancer-associated fibroblast; TME, tumor microenvironment; MSI, mass spectrometry imaging; BCAA, branched-chain amino acid; AUC, area under the curve; CE, collision energy; MALDI, matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization; MOSE, murine ovarian surface epithelial; MOE, murine oviductal epithelial; Q-TOF, quadrupole time-of-flight; LC-MS, liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry; mTOR, mechanistic target of rapamycin.

References

1. Siegel RL, Giaquinto AN, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2024. CA Cancer J Clin [Internet]. 2024; Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.3322/caac.21820 2. Bowtell DD, Böhm S, Ahmed AA, Aspuria P-J, Bast RC Jr, Beral V, et al. Rethinking ovarian cancer II: reducing mortality from high-grade serous ovarian cancer. Nat Rev Cancer. 2015;15:668–79. 3. Vaughan S, Coward JI, Bast RC Jr, Berchuck A, Berek JS, Brenton JD, et al. Rethinking .CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseavailable under a (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted October 18, 2024. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.10.15.618560doi: bioRxiv preprint 15 ovarian cancer: recommendations for improving outcomes. Nat Rev Cancer. 2011;11:719– 25. 4. Luu GT, Sanchez LM. Toward improvement of screening through mass spectrometry- based proteomics: ovarian cancer as a case study. Int J Mass Spectrom [Internet]. 2021;469. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijms.2021.116679 5. Torre LA, Trabert B, DeSantis CE, Miller KD, Samimi G, Runowicz CD, et al. Ovarian cancer statistics, 2018. CA Cancer J Clin. 2018;68:284–96. 6. Doig T, Monaghan H. Sampling the omentum in ovarian neoplasia: when one block is enough. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2006;16:36–40. 7. Nieman KM, Kenny HA, Penicka CV, Ladanyi A, Buell-Gutbrod R, Zillhardt MR, et al. Adipocytes promote ovarian cancer metastasis and provide energy for rapid tumor growth [Internet]. Nature Medicine. 2011. page 1498–503. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nm.2492 8. Gusky HC, Chkourko Gusky H, Diedrich J, MacDougald OA, Podgorski I. Omentum and bone marrow: how adipocyte-rich organs create tumour microenvironments conducive for metastatic progression [Internet]. Obesity Reviews. 2016. page 1015–29. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/obr.12450 9. Dirat B, Bochet L, Escourrou G, Valet P, Muller C. Unraveling the Obesity and Breast Cancer Links: A Role for Cancer-Associated Adipocytes? [Internet]. Adipose Tissue Development. 2010. page 45–52. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000316896 10. Suh DH, Kim HS, Kim B, Song YS. Metabolic orchestration between cancer cells and tumor microenvironment as a co-evolutionary source of chemoresistance in ovarian cancer: a therapeutic implication. Biochem Pharmacol. 2014;92:43–54. 11. Rizi BS, Caneba C, Nowicka A, Nabiyar AW, Liu X, Chen K, et al. Nitric Oxide Mediates Metabolic Coupling of Omentum-Derived Adipose Stroma to Ovarian and Endometrial Cancer Cells [Internet]. Cancer Research. 2015. page 456–71. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.can-14-1337 12. Jeon ES, Moon HJ, Lee MJ, Song HY, Kim YM, Cho M, et al. Cancer-derived lysophosphatidic acid stimulates differentiation of human mesenchymal stem cells to myofibroblast-like cells. Stem Cells. 2008;26:789–97. 13. Yeung T-L, Leung CS, Li F, Wong SST, Mok SC. Targeting Stromal-Cancer Cell Crosstalk Networks in Ovarian Cancer Treatment. Biomolecules. 2016;6:3. 14. Motohara T, Masuda K, Morotti M, Zheng Y, El-Sahhar S, Chong KY, et al. An evolving story of the metastatic voyage of ovarian cancer cells: cellular and molecular orchestration of the adipose-rich metastatic microenvironment. Oncogene. 2019;38:2885–98. 15. Wang W, Kryczek I, Dostál L, Lin H, Tan L, Zhao L, et al. Effector T Cells Abrogate Stroma- Mediated Chemoresistance in Ovarian Cancer. Cell. 2016;165:1092–105. 16. Dinkins K, Barton W, Wheeler L, Smith HJ, Mythreye K, Arend RC. Targeted therapy in high grade serous ovarian Cancer: A literature review. Gynecol Oncol Rep. Elsevier BV; .CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseavailable under a (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted October 18, 2024. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.10.15.618560doi: bioRxiv preprint 16 2024;54:101450. 17. Li Z, Fang X, Wang S. Omentum provides a special cell microenvironment for ovarian cancer. Cancer Rep. 2023;6:e1858. 18. Buchberger AR, DeLaney K, Johnson J, Li L. Mass Spectrometry Imaging: A Review of Emerging Advancements and Future Insights. Anal Chem. 2018;90:240–65. 19. Lusk H, Burdette JE, Sanchez LM. Models for measuring metabolic chemical changes in the metastasis of high grade serous ovarian cancer: fallopian tube, ovary, and omentum. Mol Omics [Internet]. 2021; Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/d1mo00074h 20. Zink KE, Dean M, Burdette JE, Sanchez LM. Capturing Small Molecule Communication Between Tissues and Cells Using Imaging Mass Spectrometry. J Vis Exp [Internet]. 2019; Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.3791/59490 21. Zink KE, Dean M, Burdette JE, Sanchez LM. Imaging Mass Spectrometry Reveals Crosstalk between the Fallopian Tube and the Ovary that Drives Primary Metastasis of Ovarian Cancer. ACS Cent Sci. 2018;4:1360–70. 22. Bergsten TM, Levy SE, Zink KE, Lusk HJ, Pergande MR, Cologna SM, et al. Fallopian tube secreted protein affects ovarian metabolites in high grade serous ovarian cancer. Front Cell Dev Biol. 2022;10:1042734. 23. Bergsten TM, Lusk HJ, Haughan MA, Guerrero JA, Levy SE, Lantvit DD, et al. Fallopian tube-derived high-grade serous cancers influence ovarian production of norepinephrine and generate specific metabolomic signatures. ACS Pharmacol Transl Sci. American Chemical Society (ACS); 2024;7:2185–95. 24. Eddie SL, Quartuccio SM, Ó hAinmhir E, Moyle-Heyrman G, Lantvit DD, Wei J-J, et al. Tumorigenesis and peritoneal colonization from fallopian tube epithelium. Oncotarget. 2015;6:20500–12. 25. Lusk HJ, Levy SE, Bergsten TM, Burdette JE, Sanchez LM. Home-Built Spinning Apparatus for Drying Agarose-Based Imaging Mass Spectrometry Samples. J Am Soc Mass Spectrom [Internet]. 2022; Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/jasms.2c00044 26. Phipps WS, Crossley E, Boriack R, Jones PM, Patel K. Quantitative amino acid analysis by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry using low cost derivatization and an automated liquid handler. JIMD Rep. 2020;51:62–9. 27. Filee R, Schoos R, Boemer F. Evaluation of physiological amino acids profiling by tandem mass spectrometry. JIMD Rep. 2014;13:119–28. 28. Skehan P, Storeng R, Scudiero D, Monks A, McMahon J, Vistica D, et al. New colorimetric cytotoxicity assay for anticancer-drug screening. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1990;82:1107–12. 29. Quartuccio SM, Karthikeyan S, Eddie SL, Lantvit DD, Ó hAinmhire E, Modi DA, et al. Mutant p53 expression in fallopian tube epithelium drives cell migration. Int J Cancer. 2015;137:1528–38. 30. Shimma S, Sugiura Y. Effective Sample Preparations in Imaging Mass Spectrometry [Internet]. Mass Spectrometry. 2014. page S0029–S0029. Available from: .CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseavailable under a (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted October 18, 2024. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.10.15.618560doi: bioRxiv preprint 17 http://dx.doi.org/10.5702/massspectrometry.s0029 31. Goodwin RJA. Sample preparation for mass spectrometry imaging: Small mistakes can lead to big consequences [Internet]. Journal of Proteomics. 2012. page 4893–911. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jprot.2012.04.012 32. Dean M, Jin V, Russo A, Lantvit DD, Burdette JE. Exposure of the extracellular matrix and colonization of the ovary in metastasis of fallopian-tube-derived cancer. Carcinogenesis. 2019;40:41–51. 33. Oetjen J, Veselkov K, Watrous J, McKenzie JS, Becker M, Hauberg-Lotte L, et al. Benchmark datasets for 3D MALDI- and DESI-imaging mass spectrometry. Gigascience. 2015;4:20. 34. Wishart DS, Knox C, Guo AC, Eisner R, Young N, Gautam B, et al. HMDB: a knowledgebase for the human metabolome. Nucleic Acids Res. 2009;37:D603–10. 35. Wishart DS, Guo A, Oler E, Wang F, Anjum A, Peters H, et al. HMDB 5.0: the Human Metabolome Database for 2022. Nucleic Acids Res. 2022;50:D622–31. 36. Wishart DS, Feunang YD, Marcu A, Guo AC, Liang K, Vázquez-Fresno R, et al. HMDB 4.0: the human metabolome database for 2018. Nucleic Acids Res. 2018;46:D608–17. 37. Schymanski EL, Jeon J, Gulde R, Fenner K, Ruff M, Singer HP, et al. Identifying small molecules via high resolution mass spectrometry: communicating confidence. Environ Sci Technol. 2014;48:2097–8. 38. Sumner LW, Amberg A, Barrett D, Beale MH, Beger R, Daykin CA, et al. Proposed minimum reporting standards for chemical analysis Chemical Analysis Working Group (CAWG) Metabolomics Standards Initiative (MSI). Metabolomics. 2007;3:211–21. 39. Jung MK, Okekunle AP, Lee JE, Sung MK, Lim YJ. Role of Branched-chain Amino Acid Metabolism in Tumor Development and Progression. J Cancer Prev. 2021;26:237–43. 40. Annesley TM. Ion suppression in mass spectrometry. Clin Chem. 2003;49:1041–4. 41. Jewell JL, Kim YC, Russell RC, Yu F-X, Park HW, Plouffe SW, et al. Metabolism. Differential regulation of mTORC1 by leucine and glutamine. Science. 2015;347:194–8. 42. Zhang S, Zeng X, Ren M, Mao X, Qiao S. Novel metabolic and physiological functions of branched chain amino acids: a review. J Anim Sci Biotechnol. 2017;8:10. 43. Nojima H, Tokunaga C, Eguchi S, Oshiro N, Hidayat S, Yoshino K-I, et al. The mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) partner, raptor, binds the mTOR substrates p70 S6 kinase and 4E-BP1 through their TOR signaling (TOS) motif. J Biol Chem. 2003;278:15461–4. 44. Zou Z, Tao T, Li H, Zhu X. mTOR signaling pathway and mTOR inhibitors in cancer: progress and challenges. Cell Biosci. 2020;10:31. 45. Choi Y-K, Park K-G. Targeting Glutamine Metabolism for Cancer Treatment. Biomol Ther . 2018;26:19–28. 46. Yuan L, Sheng X, Willson AK, Roque DR, Stine JE, Guo H, et al. Glutamine promotes .CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseavailable under a (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted October 18, 2024. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.10.15.618560doi: bioRxiv preprint 18 ovarian cancer cell proliferation through the mTOR/S6 pathway. Endocr Relat Cancer. 2015;22:577–91. 47. Fasoulakis Z, Koutras A, Ntounis T, Prokopakis I, Perros P, Chionis A, et al. Ovarian Cancer and Glutamine Metabolism. Int J Mol Sci [Internet]. 2023;24. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms24055041 48. Meng D, Yang Q, Wang H, Melick CH, Navlani R, Frank AR, et al. Glutamine and asparagine activate mTORC1 independently of Rag GTPases. J Biol Chem. 2020;295:2890–9. 49. Yang L, Moss T, Mangala LS, Marini J, Zhao H, Wahlig S, et al. Metabolic shifts toward glutamine regulate tumor growth, invasion and bioenergetics in ovarian cancer. Mol Syst Biol. 2014;10:728. 50. Masamha CP, LaFontaine P. Molecular targeting of glutaminase sensitizes ovarian cancer cells to chemotherapy. J Cell Biochem. 2018;119:6136–45. 51. Jiang J, Batra S, Zhang J. Asparagine: A Metabolite to Be Targeted in Cancers. Metabolites [Internet]. 2021;11. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/metabo11060402 52. Linares JF, Cordes T, Duran A, Reina-Campos M, Valencia T, Ahn CS, et al. ATF4-Induced Metabolic Reprograming Is a Synthetic Vulnerability of the p62-Deficient Tumor Stroma. Cell Metab. 2017;26:817–29.e6. 53. Rizzo A, Napoli A, Roggiani F, Tomassetti A, Bagnoli M, Mezzanzanica D. One-Carbon Metabolism: Biological Players in Epithelial Ovarian Cancer. Int J Mol Sci [Internet]. 2018;19. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms19072092 54. Nazari M, Muddiman DC. Polarity switching mass spectrometry imaging of healthy and cancerous hen ovarian tissue sections by infrared matrix-assisted laser desorption electrospray ionization (IR-MALDESI). Analyst. 2016;141:595–605. 55. Nazari M, Bokhart MT, Loziuk PL, Muddiman DC. Quantitative mass spectrometry imaging of glutathione in healthy and cancerous hen ovarian tissue sections by infrared matrix- assisted laser desorption electrospray ionization (IR-MALDESI). Analyst. 2018;143:654–61. 56. Taylor AJ, Dexter A, Bunch J. Exploring Ion Suppression in Mass Spectrometry Imaging of a Heterogeneous Tissue. Anal Chem. 2018;90:5637–45. 57. Wang Z-Q, Faddaoui A, Bachvarova M, Plante M, Gregoire J, Renaud M-C, et al. BCAT1 expression associates with ovarian cancer progression: possible implications in altered disease metabolism. Oncotarget. 2015;6:31522–43. 58. Ibrahim SL, Abed MN, Mohamed G, Price JC, Abdullah MI, Richardson A. Inhibition of branched-chain alpha-keto acid dehydrogenase kinase augments the sensitivity of ovarian and breast cancer cells to paclitaxel. Br J Cancer. 2023;128:896–906. 59. Zhang L, Han J. Branched-chain amino acid transaminase 1 (BCAT1) promotes the growth of breast cancer cells through improving mTOR-mediated mitochondrial biogenesis and function. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2017;486:224–31. 60. Huang S. MTOR Signaling in Metabolism and Cancer. MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital .CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseavailable under a (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted October 18, 2024. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.10.15.618560doi: bioRxiv preprint 19 Publishing Institute; 2020. .CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseavailable under a (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted October 18, 2024. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.10.15.618560doi: bioRxiv preprint

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-pdf

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2024) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-19T01:45:01.086888+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-05-23T02:00:01.238055+00:00
License: CC-BY-NC-ND-4.0