Perspectives on modes of labour and delivery after different modalities of surgery for bowel endometriosis
article
OA: closed
CC0
⤵ 1 in-corpus citation
Abstract
Bowel or intestinal endometriosis is estimated to affect 5–37% of women with deep infiltrative endometriosis (DIE), especially in the rectum and recto-sigmoid junction. However, there are no current guidelines or consensus regarding safest mode of delivery in pregnant women after different surgical interventions for bowel/intestinal endometriosis. From October 2019 to February 2020, we conducted an online survey of members of the British Society for Gynaecological Endoscopy (BSGE). These included questions on what gynaecologist members would recommend as modes of delivery in women who had different surgical modalities for bowel endometriosis, and the particular factors that influence such recommendations. Analysis of data was performed using SPSS for Windows (V9) software package. One hundred and two members of BSGE completed the survey (61.76% of BSGE gynaecologist members). Only 30.39% of respondents counsel women, pre-operatively, about possible effects of surgical treatment of bowel endometriosis on their subsequent mode of delivery. Our survey highlights wide variation in practice that currently exists. Around 70% of clinicians are not counselling patients regarding delivery options pre-surgery despite almost one-third recommending planned caesarean section if the vagina is opened. Further studies are required to stratify the risk factors for such patients when attempting vaginal delivery or caesarean section.IMPACT STATEMENTWhat is already known on this subject? Treatment of colorectal endometriosis consists of rectal shaving, discoid resection or segmental colorectal resection. However, the relationship between different surgical modalities for bowel endometriosis and the subsequent safe mode of labour and delivery remains unclear.What do the results of this study add? No study has been published that specifically looked at the particular course and outcome of labour and delivery after each of these bowel surgeries; rectal shaving, disc excision, or segmental colorectal resection. Our study highlights the wide variations in practice that currently exists. Despite around 70% of clinicians not counselling women regarding delivery options pre-surgery, almost one-third would recommend a planned caesarean section if the vagina is opened.What are the implications of these findings for clinical practice and/or further research? This study suggests that risk factors should be stratified for such patients when attempting a vaginal delivery or undergoing a caesarean section. Guidance from the ESGE and/or BSGE would be useful to aid in the counselling and informed consent of such patients.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Condition tags
MeSH descriptors
Citation neighborhood
Papers in the corpus that this work cites (lower rings, blue) and that cite this one (upper rings, green). Dot size scales with the paper's in-corpus citation count — bigger dot = more influential within the endo/adeno field. Click a dot to open that paper. [ expand to 2 hops ] — adds papers reached through this work's immediate citers/citees. Heavier; up to 60 extra dots.
References (12)
- Aggressive surgical management for advanced colorectal endometriosis via openalex
- Bowel Endometriosis: Presentation, Diagnosis, and Treatment via openalex
- Delivery and pregnancy outcome in women with bowel resection for deep endometriosis: a retrospective cohort study via openalex
- ESHRE guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of endometriosis via openalex
- Laparoscopic and transanal excision of large lower- and mid-rectal deep endometriotic nodules: the Rouen technique via openalex
- Laparoscopic treatment of endometriosis and effects on quality of life: A retrospective study using the short form EHP-5 endometriosis specific questionnaire via openalex
- Maternal and neonatal outcomes in women with colorectal endometriosis via openalex
- Outcome of laparoscopic colorectal resection for endometriosis via openalex
- W2068238837 via openalex
- W2039121124 via openalex
- W2396257084 via openalex
- W4235170670 via openalex
Cited by (1)
Source provenance
- europepmc
- last seen: 2026-06-11T06:19:48.454388+00:00
- openalex
- last seen: 2026-06-10T17:14:06.276822+00:00
- pubmed
- last seen: 2026-05-13T22:24:03.506079+00:00
- unpaywall
- last seen: 2026-06-02T02:00:03.124865+00:00
License: CC0
· commercial use OK