Metagenomics reveals potential interactions between CPR bacteria and their phages in groundwater ecosystems

preprint OA: closed
📄 Open PDF Full text JSON View at publisher
Full text 1,856 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
Abstract Candidate phyla radiation (CPR) is a vast lineage composed of bacteria with ultra-small size, streamlined genomes, notable defects in core metabolic potential and symbiotic lifestyle, which are widely detected in groundwater ecosystems. Increasing attention has focused on the physiological and ecological significance of CPR bacteria, while the potential interactions between CPR bacteria and their phages still need more exploration. Here, we collected 82 groundwater metagenomic datasets and further derived 1,162 phages with the potential to infect 2,439 groundwater CPR metagenome-assembled genomes (MAGs). Notably, the groundwater CPR MAGs were predominantly infected by temperate phages, and the abundance profiles of phage-CPR interactions in groundwater ecosystems supported the ‘Piggybacking the Winner’ (PtW) hypothesis, suggesting that lysogenic infection was a strategy co-evolved by CPR bacteria and their phages in groundwater ecosystems. Intriguingly, the groundwater CPR phages encoded various auxiliary metabolic genes (AMGs) that might promote symbiotic lifestyle and metabolic potential of host CPR MAGs. These included AMGs associated with concanavalin A-like lectin/glucanases superfamily and O-Antigen nucleotide sugar biosynthesis, which could enhance surface adhesion of host CPR MAGs. Moreover, AMGs related to ABC transport system and P-type transporter could strengthen metabolic exchange and uptake of essential nutrients from surroundings. Additionally, AMGs involved in various metabolic pathways might alleviate metabolic deficiencies in host CPR MAGs. This study elucidated the mechanisms of phage-CPR interactions and the potential roles of phages in modulating the physiology and ecology of CPR bacteria within groundwater ecosystems. Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-06-16T06:25:30.133384+00:00