Intro
According to the statistics from International Diabetes Federation (IDF), there were
425 million diabetes mellitus (DM) patients in 2017 worldwide, and that number is
expected to increase to 629 million by 2045. 1 Abnormally high blood glucose caused by insulin insufficiency or
insensitivity can lead to severe complications such as chronic renal failure,
microvascular complication, cerebrovascular accident, and infarction induced by high
glycated serum and blood vessel proteins. 2 , 3 Moreover, insufficient insulin
signal leads to the decreased glucose uptake from the blood that, in turn, can
result in ulcers, gangrene, diabetic retinopathy, and neuropathy. 2 Recent DM treatment is inclined to maintain the blood glucose level within
normal limits by (e.g. nutritional therapy and physical management) and medication
due to the incurable nature of DM. 4 , 5 Diabetic medications can be
characterized into five strategies based on their acting mechanisms: raising insulin
secretion (e.g. sulfonylurea and meglitinide analogs), reducing intestinal glucose
absorption (e.g. acarbose), triggering insulin-independent glucose uptake signaling
(e.g. thiazolidinedione and biguanide), reducing urinal glucose reabsorption (e.g.
gliflozins), and prolonging insulin sensitive [e.g. dipeptidyl peptidase 4 (DPP-4)
inhibitor and glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists] [American Diabetes
Association, 2019b]. These antidiabetic drugs help DM patients to maintain their
blood glucose levels with various adverse effects ( Table 1 ), such as urine-tract infection,
lactoacidosis, hypoglycemia, and obesity. These drug-related adverse effects can
deteriorate the quality of life of DM patients and create unsurmountable
difficulties for proper dosing regimens in a clinical setting. It has been observed
that DPP-4 inhibitors can exert a similar efficacy in reducing blood glucose levels
without severe adverse effects such as hypoglycemia as compared with sulfonylurea. 6 Nevertheless, various adverse side effects associated with the current DPP-4
inhibitor can still be observed that, in turn, can severely limit their practical
application. As such, there is a clinical demand for novel DPP-4 inhibitors from
various sources including chemical synthesis and botanic sources containing herbs
and plants with fewer side effects. In this article, we have reviewed various
approaches including in silico, in vitro enzymatic and cell assays,
and in vivo animal tests in the search for natural DPP-4 inhibitors
for the treatment of type 2 diabetes.
Current hypoglycemic agents and their side effect. 7
Methods
Virtual screening has been seamlessly integrated into drug discovery and development 75 and its success significantly relies on compound library, 76 especially the structural diversity of compound library. 77 For instance, microalgal metabolites were screened for DDP-4 inhibitors. 78 Compared with the synthesized chemicals, natural compound libraries
generally consist of more structurally diverse compounds than their synthetic counterparts, 79 providing a better screening resource. As such, numerous studies have
adopted various natural compound libraries to find novel DDP-4 inhibitors as
listed in Table
2 .
Natural compound libraries adopted by various studies.
It is not uncommon to observe that docking studies were carried out based on a
single DDP-4 crystal structure, despite the fact that a great number of
DDP-4-inhibitor co-complex structures have been deposited in the Protein Data
Bank (PDB). Deng et al . 88 for instance, docked a series of synthesized triazole-based uracil
derivatives into the linagliptin-DDP4 co-complex structure (PDB code: 2RGU)
using the standard precision (SP) Glide (Schrödinger, Inc.),
which places internally generated ligand conformations with various positions
and orientations into the binding pocket. Deng et al . 89 employed Gold (Cambridge Crystallographic Data Center),
which is a genetic algorithm (GA)-based scheme to explore the conformational
flexibility of ligand and the rotational flexibility of receptor, to dock
synthesized pyrazolo inhibitors into the quinazolinone-DDP4 co-complex structure
(PDB code: 2ONC). 90 It should be noted that both Glide and
Gold are flexible docking algorithms. 91 Nevertheless, DDP-4 is unrestrained per se as manifested
by the fact that DDP-4 consists of various binding subsites, namely
S 1 , S’ 1 , S 2 , S’ 2 , and extensive
S 2 , etc., to which the corresponding amino acids of the DDP4
substrate peptide designated by P 1 , P’ 1 , P 2 ,
P’ 2 , etc. from the nearest to the farthest cleavage point can
bind as shown in Figure
1 , 92 and S 2 , which is composed of various hydrophobic residues,
namely GLU205 and GLU206 dyad and ARG125, is highly plastic. 93 Furthermore, Nabeno et al . categorized inhibitors into
three different classes ( Figure
1 ) based on the interactions between inhibitor and DDP-4 subsites as
listed in Table 3 ,
from which it can be observed that inhibitors of different classes bind to
different DDP-4 subsites, and S 1 and S 2 are the common
binding subsites. 92 In fact, the root means square deviation (RMSD) between alogliptin-bound
protein conformation (PDB: 3G0B) and teneligliptin-bound one (PDB: 3VJK) is 1.07
Å, denoting the promiscuous nature of DDP-4 that can be further demonstrated by
Figure 2 , in which
the six DDP4 co-complex structures (PDB codes are 3W2T, 1X70, 3BJM, 2RGU, 3VJK,
and 3G0B) are superimposed. Moreover, the diverse structures of inhibitors can
also manifest the plasticity of DPP4. Lee et al . for instance,
analyzed the chemical structures of those launched DDP-4 inhibitors and divided
them into different classes 94 that, in turn, can be further noticeable the promiscuity of target protein. 95 As such, the promiscuity of DDP-4 cannot be fully taken into account
unless more sophisticated structure-based ensemble docking schemes such as
SVM-Pose/SVM-Score combinatorial ensemble docking 96 or analog-based pharmacophore ensemble schemes such as pharmacophore
ensemble/support vector machine 97 can be adopted. It can be argued that molecular dynamics (MD) can be used
to address the flexibility of DDP4 as illustrated by the study of Liu et
al . 98 Nevertheless, the lengthy MD calculation will substantially increase
computational time and expense, making it impractical to be carried out in a
high-throughput fashion, let alone the more resource-demanded quantum mechanical
(QM)/molecular mechanics (MM) algorithm. 99
Nomenclature of substrate inhibitor residues and their corresponding
subsites in the binding pocket of enzyme and the concept of three
classes of inhibitors based on their subsites.
Three classes of inhibitors based on their subsites, their corresponding
Protein Data Bank (PDB) entry, and references.
The superposition of six DDP4 co-complex structures, whose PDB codes are
3W2T (color-coded in green), 1X70 (gray), 3BJM (purple), 2RGU (orange),
3VJK (brown), and 3G0B (red). The ligand alogliptin is shown in
colors.
There are four types of assay methods for screening DPP-4 inhibitors for direct
testing: direct enzymatic assay, in vitro cell assay,
ex vivo assay, and in vivo animal tests.
DPP-4 and tested compounds are mixed in the direct enzymatic assay, followed by
adding specific substrate peptides such as
gly-pro- p -nitroanilide. The chemical
p -nitroanilide will be released from peptides and the amount is
determined by optical absorption at 405 nm at noninhibition state. 105 This method is fast for analysis and can be used to evaluate the
inhibition pattern from calculated K i values.
However, the minimum changes within direct enzymatic assay cannot be directly
translated into the actual bioactivity in cells and animals. 106
Ex vivo assay can simulate the biological interaction within
body, whereas it needs fresh serum or tissue sample as the source of
DPP-4. 107 , 108 Moreover, previous studies reported that mucosal DPP-4
inhibition can be possibly related to the onset of coeliac disease, which is an
autoimmune disorder due to the immune response to gluten. 109 , 110 However,
a modern version of DPP4 activity assay needs to homogenize the whole intestinal
biopsy that, in turn, can lead to mucosal DPP-4 inhibition. 108 Yazbeck et al . have derived a new DPP4 substrate with
13 C isotope that can be released upon reaction with DPP-4. 111 As such, the requirement to homogenize the biopsy is completely
exonerated, leading to higher correlation as compared with its conventional counterparts. 111
Myocytes and pancreatic cells are often used in the cell-based assays to discover
DPP-4 inhibitors. Because β-cells in pancreatic islet is an important GLP-1
target, the downstream signaling of GLP-1 in pancreatic cells can be an
indicator or biomarker of DPP-4 activity. 112 In addition, GLP-1 attenuates lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-induced
cardiomyocyte inflammation. The variations of inflammatory signaling including
NF-κB, ERK, and TNF-α within LPS-induced cardiomyocyte can indirectly gauge
DPP-4 activity. 113 Nevertheless, the results of cell-based assay can be an authentic
representative of the realistic situation mainly due to the fact that they do
not consider in vivo pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic
factors. Nevertheless, direct action upon target cells can be very helpful in
detailing intracellular dynamics prior to clinical or animal tests.
DPP-4 inhibitors have been highlighted as potential regimen for
autoimmune-disease based on the characteristics in T-cell activation and inflammation. 55 Notably, autoimmune animal model becomes a platform for testing
in vivo efficacy of DPP-4 inhibitors in long-term administration. 114 Alternatively, in vivo assay of DPP-4 inhibitory
efficacy can be verified by diabetic animal model despite the fact that DPP-4
can degrade GLP-1, leading to insulin desensitization and secretion decrease. 112 The most unvanquished limitation of in vivo test is that
only end-point effect can be observed in pre-testing drug candidate despite the
fact that it is more related to clinical situations. The data retrieved from
in vitro and direct enzymatic assay can be synergistically
essential for understanding the conceivable hypoglycemic mechanism.
The effects of DPP-4 studies were mainly focused on immune, endocrine, and neuron
system from the end of 1990s to early of 2000s. 115 – 117 A study reported in 2006
that incretin was the molecular target of DPP-4, suggesting the implication of
DPP-4 inhibitor in diabetes treatment. Consequently, the diabetic research has
turned into a new paradigm for searching for antidiabetic DPP-4 inhibitors. 118 To date, only very limited natural DPP-4 inhibitors from various
sources/origins have been reported ( Table 4 ). Natural DPP-4 inhibitors from
different origins using different approaches for screening the compound to reach
the target are summarized as follows. In addition to plant source, DPP-4
inhibitors from animals and microbes are single-subclasses, in which DPP-4
inhibitors from animals and microbes are peptides and macrolides, respectively.
Interestingly, the most predominant subclasses of DPP-4 inhibitors are
terpenoids, peptides, phenolics, and flavonoids. These findings have implicated
that alkaloids are not suitable as DPP-4 inhibitors or their applications in
DDP4 inhibition have not been well explored. In addition to pure compounds, some
crude extracts of natural materials or protein hydrolysates can exert DPP-4
inhibition as well. For instance, the DPP-4 inhibition activities of methanol
extracts of Ficus benghalensis, Syzigium cumini, Ocimum
sanctum , and Eucalyptus sp. have been
demonstrated. 119 , 120 The hypoglycemic efficacy of traditional Chinese
antidiabetic medicines decoction of Schizandra chinensis
Baill., Coptis chinensis, Psidium guajava L., and Morus
alba L. has been verified by DPP-4 inhibition by in
vivo test. 121 The protein hydrolysates from whey, barbel, and yam can reduce the DPP-4
activity in enzymatic measurements. 122 – 125 Through partition by
molecular sieve, the highest inhibition peptide sequences of DPP-4 such as
Ala-Pro, Leu-Pro-Val-Pro-Gln, Trp-Ser-Gly, and Phe-Ser-Asp have been
found. 126 – 128
Nevertheless, these results from in vitro enzymatic assays
cannot guarantee a promising future since physiological regulation of DPP-4 is
far more complicated than bench-top experiments. Therefore, the results from
direct enzymatic assay for new candidates or hits require further validation
such as in vivo investigations to confirm their actual
therapeutic values when compared with clinical medicines.
Natural DPP-4 inhibitors from different origins.
FSD, Phe-Ser-Asp; IPM, Ile-Pro-Met; LPVPQ, Lys-Pro-Val-Pro-Gln; WSG,
Trp-Ser-Gly.
Previous sections have described the biological functions, assay methods, and
known natural DPP-4 inhibitors, which are purported to treat DM. However, DPP-4
inhibition can possibly cause unexpected sequela owing to its entanglement with
immune response and endothelial functions. In fact, the roles of DPP-4 in
tumorigenesis and progression, respectively, have been reviewed
recently. 144 , 145 In lung cancer and pancreatic cancer, DPP-4 inhibitor
can assuredly reduce cancer progression and promote the overall survival. 146 However, in breast cancer, prostate cancer, and endometrial carcinoma,
DPP-4 inhibition would cause the opposite consequence which promotes cancer
progression. 67 , 147 , 148 The role of DPP-4 inhibition in cancer treatment is
inconclusive, but it is certain that DPP-4 inhibition in tumorigenesis and tumor
development in site-specific tumor should be considered. 144 , 145 In
addition to cancer development, opportunistic infection is another issue of
DPP-4 inhibition. Anno et al . reported a 69-year-old DM
patient, who developed fever after taking vildagliptin for 1 week owing to hypercytokinemia. 149 It is obvious that numerous chemokines such as CXCL3, CXCL4, CXCL 5, and
CXCL10 can also function as DPP-4 substrates. 56 Chen et al . have found that DM patients with short-term
DPP-4 inhibitor treatment are at higher risk of herpes zoster infection as
compared with non-DPP-4 treatment patients after surveying the Longitudinal
Health Insurance Database 2000. 150 The development of Hashimoto’s thyroiditis and celiac disease are
inversely correlated with DPP4 levels ( vide supra ), suggesting
that DPP-4 inhibition can promote disease progression. Inflammatory bowel
disease (IBD), which is a general term for Crohn’s disease and ulcerative
colitis, is caused by opportunistic infection or immune cell
infiltration. 151 , 152 A meta-analysis published by Radel et
al . has indicated that DPP-4 inhibition can increase the risk of
Crohn’s disease. 153 In conclusion, DPP-4 inhibitors can be used to treat DM, whereas their
complications with other immune disease or cancer should be seriously
considered.
Overview
DPP-4, which is a 88 kDa serine protease, contains one region of cytoplasmic
region (amino acids 1–6) coupled with transmembrane domain (amino acids 7–28)
and extracellular region (amino acids 29–766) with the main catalytic domain. 14 There are two DPP-4 isoforms in the body: membrane-bound DPP-4 (mDPP-4)
composed of full-length DPP-4 peptide; and soluble DPP-4 (sDPP-4), whose
cytoplasmic and transmembrane regions are absent. 14 Both forms can exert various biological activities in regulation of
physiology and pathology. 15
sDPP-4 is secreted by lymphocytes, circulates in the blood, 16 and shows high concentration in kidney. 17 It has been observed that sDPP-4 plays various roles in improving
skeleton muscle activity, immunocyte activation, chemotaxis, and homeostasis.
sDPP-4 can secrete into serum via the response of skeletal
muscle cells upon acute physical activities or feeding protein hydrolysate. 18 Secreted sDPP-4 can reduce vasoconstriction that is caused by
neuropeptide Y (NPY) and subsequently increase the arteriolar diameter of
skeletal muscle that provides a physiological explanation for raising training
efficiency caused by sDPP-4. 19 , 20 In addition to arteriolar
diameter of skeletal muscle, secreted sDPP-4 acts as myokine, which stimulates
inflammation in smooth muscles from blood vessel through activating
protease-activated receptor 2 (PAR2)/ERK/NF-κB signaling pathway, increasing
proinflammatory cytokine release and finally stimulating smooth muscle cell proliferation. 21 However, sDPP-4-induced smooth muscle inflammation is not always good to
the body. For instance, Romacho et al . reported sDPP-4 might
cause microvascular endothelial dysfunction, which is the cause of chronic
kidney disease in elders, through the same signaling with smooth muscle
inflammation. 22 , 23 Thus, Dubé et al . illustrated that
cardiovascular inflammation can be attenuated by DPP-4 inhibitor in the process
of HIV treatment, and that leads to diminish cardiovascular morbidity of HIV treatment. 24 In T-cell activation, sDPP-4 can activate T-cell proliferation
via co-stimulation with T-cell receptor (TCR) signaling and
Toll-like receptor, whose activation is neither associated with its enzymatic
activity nor with adenosine deaminase binding. 25 – 28 On the other hand, sDPP-4
can upregulate the expressions of IL-6 and TNF-α in monocyte through
caveolin-1/ERK/NF-κB/c-Fos signaling, which is involved in monocyte proliferation. 29 It is noteworthy that Tansi et al . proved the
interaction between DPP-4 and HIV-1 transcription regulator Tat (HIV-1-Tat). 30 Markedably, the effect on DPP-4/HIV-1-Tat in viral infection and
proliferation needs further investigative attention. The role of sDPP-4 in
chemotaxis regulation is related to the degradation of chemokine. Hematopoietic
stem cell homing is attracted by stromal cell-derived factor 1 (SDF-1/CXCL12)
and colony-stimulating factors (CSFs), which are substrates of both sDPP-4 and
mDPP4. 15 , 31 Accordingly, sDPP-4 inhibition can improve success rate of
transplantation after analyzing the relationship between sDPP-4 activity and
hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. 32 The known DPP-4 (both soluble and membrane-bound forms) substrates
include numerous homeostatic hormones such as GLP-1, NPY, glucagon, peptide Y,
and secretin, which accurately regulate blood sugar homeostasis. 15 GLP-1 is involved in insulin sensitivity and secretion, food reward, and
appetite through ghrelin and leptin, and cellular metabolism with
adiponectin. 15 , 33 – 35 NPY blocks
melanocortin-4 receptor signaling and leads to the reduction of energy
consumption and possibility of obesity. 36 , 37 After secretion from
intestinal L cell, GLP-1 is rapidly degraded by sDPP-4 into inactive GLP-1
amide, in which half-life is shorter than 2 min. 38 In dysglycemic patients, active GLP-1 content can be further decreased
and cause more severe hyperglycemia. 39 Accordingly, inhibiting sDPP-4 activity can keep more active GLP-1 and
NPY in serum and thus improve insulin efficiency. 40 Other biological activities including nonimmunodeficient virus infection
are also explored. It has been demonstrated by the case study of Middle East
respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV) infection that sDPP-4 can
potentially function to block viral infection. 41 , 42 Truncated C-X-C chemokine
10 (CXCL10) secretion in persistent infection of hepatitis C is essential, 43 implying that DPP-4 may play a role in HCV persistent infection as
manifested by a case report, in which a DM patient complicated with HCV
infection showed HCV replication reduction after sitagliptin treatment. 44 sDPP-4 is essential for maintaining immune activity and chemotaxis,
especially in inflammatory regulation, based on all available information of its
biological activities. Thus, the serum activity of sDPP-4 can be an indicator of
physiological or immunological stages.
The effect of serum sDPP-4 activity can be classified into several categories:
infection related damage, transplantation or autoimmune disease, respiratory
disease, and response to diabetic medications and complications, as discussed in
detail in the following. Serum sDPP-4 activity in HIV infection is referred to
the HIV-induced intestinal damage that is caused by Th17 cell
depletion. 45 , 46 It has been observed that rheumatoid arthritis and multiple
sclerosis patients have lower serum sDPP-4 activity than healthy
people, 47 , 48 whereas HIV patients have higher serum sDPP-4 activity. 49 Moreover, Leicht et al . analyzed sDPP-4 activity in
end-stage renal disease patients before and after kidney transplantation, and
sDPP-4 activities were found to decrease after kidney transplantation. 50 These results suggest that serum sDPP-4 activity can be a potential
biomarker for monitoring the progress of autoimmune disease and the prognosis of
organ transplantation. Interestingly, serum sDPP-4 activity can be associated
with the progress of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), 51 which is highly correlated with respiratory inflammation, obviously
indicating the relationship between serum sDPP-4 activity and COPD progression. 52 However, the prognosis of malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM), which is
a rare pulmonary malignancy, can be predicted by sDPP-4 activity in pleural fluid. 53 The pathological correlation between sDPP-4 activity and MPM prognosis is
still veiled. These reports provide interesting suggestions about sDPP-4 levels
as the biomarkers of various diseases, which are not easy to monitor in serum or
other body fluid.
Remarkably, mDPP-4 can be found mainly in the kidney, gastrointestinal tract, T
lymphocytes, and reproductive organs. 54 , 55 Biological activities of
mDPP-4 include the regulation of immune response and blood vessel function. 15 mDPP4, also named CD26, is a T-cell co-stimulator of T-cell receptor
responding to antigen-presenting cells. 56 Thus, mDPP-4 recently has been considered as a potent target in treatment
of transplantation and autoimmune disease. Dolanbay et al .
reported an interesting study about the impact of mDPP-4 inhibition in early
pregnancy that can be important in treating recurrent implantation failure. 57 In hematopoietic stem cell transplantation,
graft- versus -host disease (GVHD) is a common complication,
which is critical in survival rate after transplantation. 58 Zhang et al . proved the association between Th17 cells
and GVHD and which Th17 cell can be regulated by mDPP-4 inhibition that
indicates current DPP-4 inhibitors can help ameliorating the onset of GVHD. 59 The impact of mDPP-4 in immune regulation is also implicated in
autoimmune disease and hypersensitivity. mDPP-4 expression levels in
CD8 + T cells of Hashimoto’s thyroiditis patients are
significantly lower than healthy subjects that is plausibly attributed to
disease progression. 60 In contrast, mDPP-4 levels are almost 11-fold higher in psoriatic skin
than in normal skin, asserting the involvement of mDPP-4 in psoriatic development. 61 mDPP-4 plays a positive role in asthma progress through promoting T-cell activation. 62 These reports have unequivocally demonstrated the positive role played by
mDPP-4 in immune regulation. mDPP-4 acts on both endothelial and epithelial
cells in regulation of blood vessel function,. In addition to endothelial
inflammation caused by sDPP-4, the role of mDPP-4 in endothelial generally
involves the endothelial migration, angiogenesis, and proliferation under
hypoxia status, which can be found in the development of endometriosis. 63 Xu et al . have pointed out that DPP-4 inhibitors that
can alleviate pulmonary artery remodeling and, finally, delay the development of
pulmonary hypertension. 64 In the regulation of cardiovascular function, mDPP-4 inhibition can
reverse diastolic left ventricular dysfunction via inhibiting
mDPP-4/SDF-1α related angiogenesis. 65 mDPP-4 involves in epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) for epithelial cell, 66 suggesting the potential implication of mDDP-4 in promoting cancer
development. In fact, breast cancer metastasis can be triggered by DPP4
inhibition through CXCL12/CXCR4/mTOR pathway. 67 However, DPP-4 inhibitor shows the opposite activity in non-small cell
lung cancer, which suppresses cancer cell growth via
macrophage-mediated natural killer (NK) cell activation. 68 Collectively, these studies have furnished comprehensive descriptions of
mDPP-4 biological functions in the whole body and further manifest that DPP-4
inhibition (sDPP-4 or mDPP-4) can produce unexpected side effects.
The endocrinological impact of DPP-4 is more prominent in the mediation of blood
glucose. DPP-4 inhibition is a predominant approach for treating diabetes
because of prolonged incretin half-lives within serum, especially in type 2 DM. 69 In addition, it has been suggested that sitagliptin can preserve
pancreatic β-cell function and subsequently stabilize insulin secretion as shown
by two 4-year clinical trials, in which sitagliptin was adopted to treat slowly
progressive type 1 DM (SPTIDDM) and latent autoimmune diabetes adult
(LADA). 55 , 70 In addition to clinical treatment, DPP-4 levels can be used
as a biomarker. For instance, high serum sDPP-4 levels can be referred to the
elevated glycation end products, which subsequently evoke endothelial cell
damage and diabetic nephropathy incidence. 71 , 72 In addition, high serum
sDPP-4 levels also indicate worse drug response to DPP-4 inhibitor and
hyperglycemia, which are the indicators of poor glycemic control and advanced
disease progress. 73 , 74 The above information emphasizes the effect of DPP-4
inhibition and monitoring in DM treatment. The method of screening DPP-4
inhibitor and the recent known natural DPP-4 inhibitors are presented in the
following.
Perspectives
The effect of virtual screening via computational biology or
informatics further combined with in vitro enzymatic and cell
assay, and in vivo animal tests offer a promising approach to
discover candidates or hits for expediting the preclinical development process
( Figure 3 ).
Nevertheless, poor or ill drug absorption, distribution, metabolism, excretion, and
toxicity (ADME/Tox) properties make substantial contributions to drug attritions, 154 and little effort has been dedicated to profiling ADME/Tox properties of
DDP-4 inhibitors. As such, it is necessary to predict ADME/Tox parameters in the
process of virtual screening, which should be carried by adopting schemes that can
consider the unstructured nature of DDP-4, to minimize the late-stage failures.
Effect of natural products in DPP-4 inhibition and the screening methods.
Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below.
Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure
cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can
have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy
(via DOI)
is the canonical version.