Comparison of 3D and 2D FSE T2-weighted MR imaging in the diagnosis of pelvic endometriosis: preliminary results

article OA: green CC0
AI-generated summary by qwen3.7-flash, 2026-08-20

This preliminary study compared three-dimensional and two-dimensional fast spin-echo T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging techniques for the diagnosis of pelvic endometriosis.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

Poster: ECR 2011 / C-2243 / Comparison of 3D and 2D FSE T2-weighted MR imaging in the diagnosis of pelvic endometriosis: preliminary results by: M. Bazot 1, A. stivalet2, I. Thomassin-Naggara1, E. Darai1, C. Coudray1, E. Poncelet3; 1Paris/FR, 2puteaux/FR, 3Lille/FR
Full text 4,043 characters · extracted from oa-html · 5 sections · click to expand

Keywords

Genital / Reproductive system female, MR, Computer Applications-3D, Technical aspects, Inflammation Authors: M. Bazot1, A. stivalet2, I. Thomassin-Naggara1, E. Darai1, C. Coudray1, E. Poncelet3; 1Paris/FR, 2puteaux/FR, 3Lille/FR DOI: 10.1594/ecr2011/C-2243 Purpose Pelvic endometriosis is a frequent gynecologic disorder affecting 10-15% of women in reproductive years. MRI has been demonstrated to be the best imaging technique to assess the various locations of deep infiltrating endometriosis (DIE). Conventional MRI protocol for the diagnosis of pelvic endometriosis includes multiplanar 2D Fast Spin Echo (FSE) T2-weighted MR images in addition to T1 weighted MR images with and without fat-suppressed technique (1). With this protocol, various studies have demonstrated that MRI is relevant to predict the extension of pelvic endometriosis with...

Methods

and Materials Between February 2010 and May 2010, 110 consecutive patients from two different radiological centers (median age: 34 years; range 24-46 years), referred for pelvic MR imaging for a clinical suspicion of endometriosis, were prospectively enrolled (IRB and written informed consent obtained). MRI technique MR images were acquired on 1.5 Tesla system. In both radiological centers, a conventional protocol including sagittal, axial, coronal oblique FSE T2-weighted images and 3D gradient echo T1 images ± fat suppression was used. Three-dimensional imaging using a coronal single slab 3D...

Results

Surgical and pathologic findings Out of 110 patients, 23 underwent surgery. All patients except 3 (87%) had histologically proven pelvic endometriosis. Ovarian endometriosis and DIE was present in 11 (47.8%) and 18 (78.2%) out of 23 patients, respectively. DIE of uterosacral ligaments, vagina, rectosigmoid colon, and bladder was detected in 17 (73.9%), 5 (21.7%), 13 (56.5%) and 1(4.3%) out of 23 patients, respectively. Complete cul-de-sac obliteration was noted in 10 (30.3%) out of 23 patients. Overall imaging quality evaluation Overall imaging quality evaluation was performed...

Conclusion

The present study demonstrates that despite a lower overall imaging quality, 3D CUBE offers similar accuracy to diagnoseDIE compared to 2D FSE T2-weighted MRI. MRI evaluation of pelvic endometriosis is routinely performed with multiplanar sagittal, axial and coronal 2D FSE T2-weighted sequences. These sequences are significantly longer to acquire, compared to 3D CUBE, and on average twice as long. This gain in acquisition time represents a major advantage of 3D CUBE. Our study is the first focusing on the contribution of 3D T2-weighted MR imaging...

References

1. Bazot M, Gasner A, Ballester M, Darai E. Value of thin-section oblique axial T2-weighted images to assess uterosacral ligament endometriosis. Human Reproduction 2010;(in press). 2. Bazot M, Darai E, Hourani R, et al. Deep pelvic endometriosis: MR imaging for diagnosis and prediction of extension of disease. Radiology 2004;232(2):379-389. 3. Abrao MS, Goncalves MO, Dias JA, Jr., Podgaec S, Chamie LP, Blasbalg R. Comparison between clinical examination, transvaginal sonography and magnetic resonance imaging for the diagnosis of deep endometriosis. Hum Reprod 2007;22(12):3092-3097. 4. Bazot M,... Personal Information Marc Bazot, MD1, Aude Stivalet, MD1, Thomassin-Naggara, MD1, PhD1,Emile Daraï, MD2, PhD2 Cyril Coudray3, and Edouard Poncelet, MD4 Departments of Radiology (1) and Obstetrics and Gynecology (2), Tenon hospital, 4 rue de la Chine, 75020, Paris, Assistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP) General Electric Healthcare (3), 11, avenue Morane Saulnier, 78140, Velizy Department of Radiology (4), Jeanne de Flandre hospital, Lille Correspondence: Professor Marc Bazot, Service de Radiologie, Hôpital Tenon, APHP, 4 rue de la Chine, 75020, Paris, France Tel: +33 1 56 0170...

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-html

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Condition tags

endometriosis

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.

Source provenance

openalex
last seen: 2026-06-10T17:14:06.276822+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK