Improving Statistical Analysis in Team Science: The Case of a Bayesian Multiverse of Many Labs 4

preprint OA: closed CC-BY-4.0
🔓 Open OA copy View at publisher

Abstract

Team science projects have become the gold standard for assessing the replicability and variability of key findings in psychological science. However, we believe the typical meta-analytic approach in these projects fails to match the wealth of collected data. Instead, we advocate the use of Bayesian hierarchical modeling for team science projects, potentially extended in a multiverse analysis. We illustrate this full-scale analysis by applying it to the recently published Many Labs 4 project. This project aimed to replicate the mortality salience effect – that being reminded of one’s own death strengthens the own cultural identity. In a multiverse analysis we assess the robustness of the results with varying data inclusion criteria and prior settings. Bayesian model comparison results largely converge to a common conclusion: the data provide evidence against a mortality salience effect across the majority of our analyses. We issue general recommendations to facilitate full-scale analyses in team science projects.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-19T01:45:01.086888+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-05-23T02:00:01.238055+00:00
License: CC-BY-4.0