Improving Statistical Analysis in Team Science: The Case of a Bayesian Multiverse of Many Labs 4
preprint
OA: closed
CC-BY-4.0
Abstract
Team science projects have become the gold standard for assessing the replicability and variability of key findings in psychological science. However, we believe the typical meta-analytic approach in these projects fails to match the wealth of collected data. Instead, we advocate the use of Bayesian hierarchical modeling for team science projects, potentially extended in a multiverse analysis. We illustrate this full-scale analysis by applying it to the recently published Many Labs 4 project. This project aimed to replicate the mortality salience effect – that being reminded of one’s own death strengthens the own cultural identity. In a multiverse analysis we assess the robustness of the results with varying data inclusion criteria and prior settings. Bayesian model comparison results largely converge to a common conclusion: the data provide evidence against a mortality salience effect across the majority of our analyses. We issue general recommendations to facilitate full-scale analyses in team science projects.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Citation neighborhood (no data yet)
We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.
Source provenance
- europepmc
- last seen: 2026-05-19T01:45:01.086888+00:00
- unpaywall
- last seen: 2026-05-23T02:00:01.238055+00:00
License: CC-BY-4.0