ASPIRE Consensus on the Structure of Care in Endometriosis - Networks of Expertise

Background: Effective management of endometriosis necessitates a comprehensive, multidisciplinary approach. Networks or centres of expertise play a pivotal role in enhancing clinical care, fostering collaboration, and promoting innovative research, knowledge dissemination, and healthcare professional training. Despite the established benefits of structured care systems, there remains no global consensus on the essential components of an endometriosis network of expertise. This study aims to define key elements for such networks, with a particular focus on improving care structures in the Asia-Pacific region.

A three-stage consensus process was conducted by Asia Pacific Initiative on Reproduction (ASPIRE), incorporating literature review, modified Delphi surveys, and face-to-face and virtual consensus meetings. The process involved multidisciplinary stakeholders, including medical and paramedical professionals, researchers, patients and patient advocates. Two rounds of Delphi surveys refined key features based on stakeholder input, followed by consensus refinement through a face-to-face consensus development meeting at the ASPIRE Auckland Endometriosis Masterclass 2024, a subsequent Zoom meeting, then specific patient and patient advocate input to finalise the key features.

Consensus was reached on 38 key features, categorised into five domains: network importance, organisational structure, clinical services, training and research. The study highlights the strength of a multidisciplinary approach, ensuring accessibility to specialised surgical, pain management and fertility services, with the person with endometriosis at the centre of this structure. The inclusion of experts in acupuncture, nutrition, psychology, physiotherapy and other allied health fields enhances patient care through a multidisciplinary holistic care approach, addressing the diverse needs of individuals with endometriosis.

Consensus has been reached on key features of an endometriosis network of expertise, incorporating the perspectives of those with lived experience and their advocates, to improve endometriosis care across the Asia-Pacific region. This framework serves as a reference for global discussions. It has the potential to become an audit accreditation standard in Asia-Pacific.

- 1. , A systematic review on the prevalence of endometriosis in women. Indian J Med Res. 2021; 154(3) :446–54. Crossref, Google Scholar - 2. , World Endometriosis Society consensus on the classification of endometriosis. Hum Reprod. 2017; 32(2) :315–24. Crossref, Google Scholar - 3. , Risk for and consequences of endometriosis: a critical epidemiologic review. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2018; 51 :1–15. Crossref, Google Scholar - 4. . The significant effect of endometriosis on physical, mental and social wellbeing: results from an international cross-sectional survey. Hum Reprod. 2013; 28(10) :2677–85. Crossref, Google Scholar - 5. . Multi-disciplinary centres/networks of excellence for endometriosis management and research: a proposal. Hum Reprod. 2006; 21(11) :2743–8. Crossref, Google Scholar - 6. . Consensus on current management of endometriosis. Hum Reprod. 2013; 28(6) :1552–68. Crossref, Google Scholar - 7. . European accreditation of endometriosis centers of expertise? Gynecol Obstet Invest. 2013; 76(1) :1–3. Crossref, Google Scholar - 8. , A core outcome set for future endometriosis research: an international consensus development study. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 2020; 127(8) :967–74. Crossref, Google Scholar - 9. . Using Delphi technique to build consensus in practice. Int J Bus Sci Appl Manage. 2014; 9 :65–82. Crossref, Google Scholar - 10. . The Delphi method for graduate research. J Inform Technol Educ: Res. 2007; 6 :1–21. Google Scholar - 11. Williamson PR, Altman DG, Bagley H, et al.. The COMET Handbook: version 1.0. Trials. 2017;18(Suppl. 3):280. Google Scholar - 12. , Medical treatment or surgery for colorectal endometriosis? Results of a shared decision-making approach. Hum Reprod. 2018; 33(2) :202–11. Crossref, Google Scholar - 13. , Treatment preferences for medication or surgery in patients with deep endometriosis and bowel involvement – a discrete choice experiment. BJOG. 2022; 129(8) :1376–85. Crossref, Google Scholar - 14. , Gynaecological care of women with chronic pelvic pain: patient perspectives and care preferences. BJOG. 2023; 130(5) :476–84. Crossref, Google Scholar - 15. . Pelvic MRI in the diagnosis and staging of pelvic endometriosis: added value of structured reporting and expertise. Abdom Radiol (NY). 2020; 45(6) :1623–36. Crossref, Google Scholar - 16. . Ovarian immobility at transvaginal ultrasound: an important sonographic marker for prediction of need for pelvic sidewall surgery in women with suspected endometriosis. J Ultrasound Med. 2022; 41(5) :1109–13. Crossref, Google Scholar - 17. . The role of minimally invasive gynecologic surgeons in the era of subspecialties: when to refer and consult. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2022; 34(4) :190–5. Crossref, Google Scholar - 18. . Towards comprehensive management of symptomatic endometriosis: beyond the dichotomy of medical versus surgical treatment. Hum Reprod. 2024; 39(3) :464–77. Crossref, Google Scholar - 19. . Economic implications of endometriosis: a review. Pharmacoeconomics. 2022; 40(12) :1143–58. Crossref, Google Scholar - 20. , Lessons from implementing the Australian National Action Plan for Endometriosis. Reprod Fertil. 2022; 3(3) :C29–C39. Crossref, Google Scholar - 21. , Study of postoperative complications after the implementation of a multidisciplinary care pathway for patients with digestive endometriosis. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2023; 307(5) :1459–68. Crossref, Google Scholar - 22. . Acupuncture for endometriosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Integr Med Res. 2023; 12(4) :101003. Crossref, Google Scholar - 23. . Allied health and complementary therapy usage in Australian women with chronic pelvic pain: a cross-sectional study. BMC Womens Health. 2022; 22(1) :37. Crossref, Google Scholar - 24. , ESHRE guideline: endometriosis. Hum Reprod Open. 2022; 2022(2) :hoac009. Crossref, Google Scholar - 25. , Scoping review to identify strategies and interventions improving interprofessional collaboration and integration in primary care. BMJ Open. 2022; 12(10) :e062111. Crossref, Google Scholar - 26. . Integrated care models in Swiss primary care: an embedded multiple case study. J Eval Clin Pract. 2023; 29(6) :1025–38. Crossref, Google Scholar