Nageotte nodules in human DRG reveal neurodegeneration in painful diabetic neuropathy

Nageotte nodules in human DRG reveal neurodegeneration in painful diabetic neuropathy | Research Square window.SnipcartSettings = { analytics: { enabled: false } }; (function() { var accessVector = localStorage.getItem('access_vector') || ''; window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; if (accessVector) { window.dataLayer.push({ user: { profile: { profileInfo: { snid: accessVector } } } }); } })(); (function(w,d,s,l,i){w[l]=w[l]||[];w[l].push({'gtm.start':new Date().getTime(),event:'gtm.js'});var f=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0],j=d.createElement(s),dl=l!='dataLayer'?'&l='+l:'';j.async=true;j.src='https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtm.js?id='+i+dl;f.parentNode.insertBefore(j,f);})(window,document,'script','dataLayer','GTM-K279D39R'); Browse Preprints In Review Journals COVID-19 Preprints AJE Video Bytes Research Tools Research Promotion AJE Professional Editing AJE Rubriq About Preprint Platform In Review Editorial Policies Our Team Advisory Board Help Center Sign In Submit a Preprint Cite Share Download PDF Article Nageotte nodules in human DRG reveal neurodegeneration in painful diabetic neuropathy Theodore Price, Stephanie Shiers, Khadijah Mazhar, Andi Wangzhou, and 9 more This is a preprint; it has not been peer reviewed by a journal. https://doi.org/ 10.21203/rs.3.rs-5006011/v1 This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License Status: Published Journal Publication published 05 May, 2025 Read the published version in Nature Communications → Version 1 posted You are reading this latest preprint version Abstract Diabetic neuropathy is frequently accompanied by pain and loss of sensation attributed to axonal dieback. We recovered dorsal root ganglia (DRGs) from 90 organ donors, 19 of whom had medical indices for diabetic painful neuropathy (DPN). Nageotte nodules, dead sensory neurons engulfed by non-neuronal cells, were abundant in DPN DRGs and accounted for 25% of all neurons. Peripherin-and Nav1.7-positive dystrophic axons invaded Nageotte nodules, forming small neuroma-like structures. Using histology and spatial sequencing, we demonstrate that Nageotte nodules are mainly composed of satellite glia and non-myelinating Schwann cells that express SPP1 and are intertwined with sprouting sensory axons originating from neighboring neurons. Our findings solve a 100-year mystery of the nature of Nageotte nodules linking these pathological structures to pain and sensory loss in DPN. Biological sciences/Neuroscience/Cellular neuroscience Biological sciences/Neuroscience/Cell death in the nervous system Figures Figure 1 Figure 2 Figure 3 Figure 4 Figure 5 Introduction Jean Nageotte, a French neuroanatomist, first described residual nodules, now known as Nageotte nodules, in 1922 after conducting nerve-graft experiments in rabbits. He described these structures as clusters of satellite glia that fill the space of decomposed sensory neurons: “As the nerve cell corpse is reabsorbed, the satellite cells proliferate, and when the nerve cell has disappeared, they form a nodule 1 .” Since his discovery, Nageotte nodules have been infrequently described in the literature with the majority of papers reporting their presence in ganglia from macaques (4 publications; 2-5 ), humans (21 publications; 6-26 ), and rats (2 publications 27,28 ), associated with various neurodegenerative conditions and rare diseases. Human data on Nageotte nodules are limited to neuropathological findings in sensory ganglia with long post-mortem intervals (PMIs) and are, in most cases, from single case studies. As such, little is known about the molecular identity of these structures, nor their involvement in the context of pain and neurodegeneration. The identity and potential clinical importance of these pathological structures appears to be a story that has been lost to time. Diabetic painful neuropathy (DPN) is the most common form of neuropathic pain. Patients often report spontaneous shooting or stabbing pain accompanied by sensory deficits, which is usually attributed to die-back of sensory axons from the epidermis 29 . Sural nerve biopsies show that this axonal loss in DPN can be extensive. The stabbing and shooting pain in DPN is attributed to spontaneous action potentials generated in DRG nociceptors because microneurography studies in patients show that pain is correlated with activity in these axons 30-33 . While advances in understanding the underlying mechanisms of DPN have been made 29 , there are no mechanism-based treatments for the disease and there is no unifying theories of pathology that directly connect the mix of loss of function (sensory and proprioceptive loss) and gain of function (spontaneous pain) that are so common in this disease. To investigate the molecular identity of Nageotte nodules and to address their role in human disease, we recovered dorsal root ganglia (DRGs) from a large sample of organ donors (90 donors) with short PMIs (average: 2 hours) and with detailed medical histories ( Supplementary Table 1 ). Tissue quality was assessed using established protocols 34 . We first conducted Hematoxylin and Eosin staining on all DRGs (90 donors) and observed Nageotte nodules in DRGs from diabetics that increased in relation to DPN (analgesic usage, diagnosis of diabetic peripheral neuropathy, and/or diabetes-related amputation) ( Fig 1A-B ). A small subset of non-diabetic donors with other pain conditions such as fibromyalgia or idiopathic peripheral neuropathy also showed high numbers of Nageotte nodules within DRGs ( Supplemental Fig 1A-B) . This appeared to be specific for pain disorders with a neuropathic component because Nageotte nodules were not routinely noted in DRGs obtained from donors with arthritis. However, the affected arthritic joints were not noted in the medical history, thereby, the DRGs associated to arthritic pain dermatomes may not have been investigated. Lumbar (L5) and sacral (S1) DRGs recovered from a diabetic donor with below-the-knee amputation of the right leg revealed Nageotte nodules in DRGs from both sides of the body ( Supplemental Fig 1C ), supporting that Nageotte nodule formation is not unilateral, nor a result of amputation. In a subset of DPN donors, we were also able to procure DRGs from the upper thoracic area (T4). We observed comparable Nageotte nodule content between lumbar and thoracic 4 DRGs in the DPN donors ( Supplemental Fig 1D ), indicating that Nageotte nodule formation also likely occurs across DRG levels/dermatomes. Jean Nageotte reported that the cells comprising Nageotte nodules are satellite glial cells (SGCs) 1 . In order to quantify the percentage of Nageotte nodules in relation to the total neuronal population, we conducted immunohistochemistry for glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP), a marker of SGCs and non-myelinating Schwann cells 35 , and peripherin, a sensory neuron marker, in non-diabetic and DPN DRGs. As expected, we observed robust GFAP signal localized to the cells forming Nageotte nodules. When quantified, we found that 25% of the neurons had a Nageotte nodule morphology in the DPN DRGs, suggesting that a quarter of all sensory neurons are dead in these individuals ( Fig 1C-D ). Peripherin staining revealed a neuroma-like axonal structure intertwined with the cells forming Nageotte nodules ( Fig 1E ) similar to descriptions by Nageotte in rabbit DRG in 1922 1 ( Fig 1F ). Nageotte posited that these “arborizations of residual nodules” were axonal sprouts from the hypertrophied glomeruli of surviving neurons: “extremely rich bouquets of fibers, which arise from the glomeruli of surviving nerve cells, and which will flourish in the neighboring residual nodules, formed by the satellite elements of dead nerve cells” 1 ( Fig 1F ). Transmission electron microscopy supported the existence of thin, unmyelinated fibers intertwined with the cells at Nageotte nodules ( Fig 1G, Supplemental Fig 2A-D ). Interestingly, there was also a significant increase in peripherin-positive axonal sprouting that spanned the entirety of the DPN DRGs compared to non-diabetic controls ( Supplemental Fig 3A-B ). These axonal sprouts not only intertwined with the cells forming Nageotte nodules, but also surrounded sensory neurons with visible cell bodies ( Supplemental Fig 3C, Supplemental Movie 1 ). In rodents and humans with neuropathic pain, tyrosine hydroxylase (TH)-expressing sympathetic axons are known to encircle sensory neurons, forming basket-like structures called pericellular nests (PCNs) 36-38 . Nageotte nodules are anatomically distinguishable from PCNs because they do not have a neuronal soma and are conglomerates of non-neuronal cells. However, we also observed numerous PCNs in the DPN DRGs ( Supplemental Fig 3C ). Jean Nageotte surmised that the axons comprising Nageotte nodules and PCNs were not sympathetic in origin as they formed within 24 hours in his ganglia preparations, were highly numerous, and sprouted from sensory neurons 1 ( Supplemental Fig 3D) . He also postulated that the PCNs and Nageotte nodule arborizations were the same structures at difference stages of neuron decay/death ( Supplemental Fig 3D-E ): “These arborizations of residual nodules and Dogiel’s pericellular platoons are one and the same thing. I was able to convince myself that, at the beginning, all the arborizations of the residual nodules begin as pericellular platoons developed around dying or dead nerve cells 1 .” To assess possible sympathetic sprouting in DPN DRGs, we labeled sympathetic fibers using tyrosine hydroxylase (TH) which robustly stained sympathetic neurons and fibers in the human sympathetic chain ganglia ( Supplemental Fig 4A ) and sparse fibers within the nerve attached to the DRG ( Supplemental Fig 4B ) but showed little-to-no axonal labeling within the DRG ( Supplemental Fig 4C ). We found no evidence for TH-positive axons at Nageotte nodules (Fig 2A), nor at PCNs, indicating that these arborizations are not sympathetic. It is important to note that the high population of non-sympathetic PCNs in the DPN DRGs is largely contrasting to the prevalence of sympathetic PCNs noted in rodents and humans with other types of neuropathic pain 36-38 . For example, only 2 sympathetic PCNs were found in a DRG from a human with herniated intervertebral disc and severe sciatica pain 38 . The differences in prevalence and in the expression of TH of these morphologically similar structures indicate that these are likely two distinct pathologies. We next sought to identify the nature of these sprouting axons into Nageotte nodules, hypothesizing that they could be nociceptive fibers. To test this hypothesis, we conducted immunohistochemistry for the capsaicin-receptor, TrpV1, which is expressed at the mRNA and protein level in all human nociceptors 39-41 . However, the majority of the DPN samples, particularly the DRGs obtained from donors who had established diagnoses of diabetic peripheral neuropathy or diabetes-related amputation, showed a drastic decrease in TrpV1 protein expression throughout the DRG ( Supplemental Fig 5A-B) . These data corroborated published mRNA sequencing data in which TrpV1 mRNA is significantly decreased in human DPN DRGs 42 . However, one DPN DRG from an organ donor who was diabetic, taking analgesics, and had difficulty walking (donor 12) showed elevated TrpV1 expression within the DRG ( Supplemental Fig 5A-B ). In this donor, TrpV1 was detected in axons at Nageotte nodules ( Fig 2B ), and in dystrophic axons (Supplemental Fig 5C) .TrpV1-positive axonal fibers at Nageotte nodules arose from a thickened portion of a TrpV1-positive axon, potentially a glomerulus given its close proximity to two TrpV1-positive sensory neurons ( Fig 2B ). We then assessed Nav1.7 expression in axonal arborizations at Nageotte nodules. In humans, the voltage gated sodium channel (VGSC) Nav1.7 is known to be expressed in sensory neurons, including all human nociceptors 39,40 , and in painful neuromas ( 41-43 ) which are suspected to give rise to ectopic activity as has been evidenced by the efficacy of VGSC blockers in experimental ( 44-47 ) and human neuromas ( 48 ). Similar to neuromas, Nageotte nodules express regenerative axon markers like GAP-43 ( 26 ) and morphologically appear similar given the abundance of abnormal axonal sprouting. Nav1.7 was expressed by the axonal arborizations at Nageotte nodules ( Fig 2C, Supplemental Fig 6 ), in axonal fibers throughout the DRG including PCNs, and within the membrane of dystrophic axons which were frequently observed in the DPN DRGs ( Supplemental Fig 7A-B) . Neuroaxonal dystrophy is a known pathology in humans with diabetes 26,43 , and is marked by the formation of dystrophic axons that are believed to form as a result of “frustrated axonal regeneration” in which the axon terminals of regenerating sensory fibers swell, and contain large numbers of neurofilaments, vesicles, and neuropeptides like CGRP 26 . Jean Nageotte reported similar structures in decaying spinal ganglia which he called “adventitious buds” or “growth balls.” He claimed these structures sprouted from the sensory neuron soma, glomerulus, and the extracapsular portion of the axon in a process that he called collateral regeneration ( Supplemental Fig 7B-C). Jean Nageotte’s theory of collateral regeneration contrasts with the classically defined pseudounipolar shape of sensory neurons as it suggests that sensory neurons can take on a multipolar phenotype in degenerating DPN DRGs. We describe two lines of evidence supporting the hypothesis that DRG neurons take on a multipolar phenotype when they sprout into Nageotte nodules. First, we conducted filament tracing of peripherin-positive axonal fibers within DRG tissue sections to identify the origin of Nageotte nodules axon bundles. In many cases, Nageotte nodule axon bundles originated from discontinuous collaterals from outside the field of view; however, we were able to confidently trace the fibers in two Nageotte nodules which were connected to neurites and local dystrophic axons that budded from local sensory neurons ( Fig 3A, Supplemental Movie 2 ). We also traced many thin fibers that appeared to stem from the neuronal soma ( Fig 3B ), forming a PCN around the same neuron and supporting not only a multipolar phenotype, but also lending credence to Jean Nageotte’s claim that non-sympathetic PCNs arise from sensory neurons. Second, dissociated sensory neurons from human DRGs take on a multipolar morphology in vitro and display dystrophic axonal budding from the neuronal soma and elongated axonal branches that intertwine with in vitro structures that resemble Nageotte nodules ( Fig 3B, Supplemental Movie 3 ). Together, these findings support Jean Nageotte’s original ideas on PCNs and Nageotte nodules and offer an updated view on Jean Nageotte’s theory of collateral regeneration ( Fig 3C ). To elucidate the molecular profile of Nageotte nodules, we conducted spatial transcriptomics of DPN DRGs and selected barcodes overlapping Nageotte nodules and adjacent neurons ( Fig 4A ). We identified 1094 barcodes that were overlapping single Nageotte nodules, and 1087 that were touching nearby neurons ( Fig 4A ). Gene ontology of Nageotte nodules identified many terms related to sensory neuron degeneration ( Fig 4B ) as well as other terms associated with cellular components, biological processes, and molecular functions associated with axonal sprouting and sensory neuron pathology ( Supplemental Table 2 ). A full list of mRNAs detected at Nageotte nodules can be found in Supplemental Table 3 . While Jean Nageotte wrote that Nageotte nodules were formed by SGCs 1 , there has been no molecular characterization of these structures to confirm their cellular composition. Using cell-type marker genes identified in the spatial sequencing data, we conducted histology to validate localization of specific cell types to Nageotte nodules. Schwann cell and SGC markers like S100 and SOX10 were both detected at Nageotte nodules ( Supplemental Fig 8A ), while the blood vessel marker, CD31, was not ( Supplemental Fig 8B ). In conducting these experiments, we noted that Nageotte nodules could be separated into different populations based on their expression of the SGC-specific marker, FABP7, and the SGC and Schwann cell marker, SOX10 ( Fig 4C-D ). SOX10 is a transcription factor required for the differentiation of pluripotent neural crest cells into SGCs and Schwann cells 44,45 , thereby, cells that are SOX10-positive, but FABP7-negative are Schwann cells, while cells expressing both are SGCs. While virtually all of the cells at Nageotte nodules were SOX10-positive, FABP7 was only detected in a subset of them ( Fig 4C-D ). CD68, a macrophage marker, was also detected in a small number of peripheral cells at Nageotte nodules ( Fig 4C-D ); however, CD68 along with other antigen-presenting cell markers have been reported to be expressed in SGCs in the human trigeminal ganglia 46 . Deconvolution of the Nageotte nodule barcodes using single-nuclei RNA sequencing data of human DRG cell types revealed that the highest percentage of non-neuronal mRNA transcripts at Nageotte nodules belonged to SGCs and non-myelinating Schwann cells, followed by fibroblasts, macrophages, endothelial cells, T-cells and other cell types ( Fig 4E, Supplemental Table 4 ). Because our histology findings suggested that Nageotte nodules have different cellular compositions, we examined whether we could identify unique clusters of Nageotte nodule types from spatial barcodes. We identified 5 different subclusters of Nageotte nodules ( Fig 4F ) that were represented across all donors, indicating that these subclusters are not a product of individual differences ( Supplemental Fig 9A ). Deconvolution analysis revealed small differences in the composition of cell types within each cluster ( Fig 4G ). The most abundant of these was neuronal in each cluster. Given that there is no neuronal soma at Nageotte nodules, the neuronal signature is likely related to axonally trafficked mRNAs from nearby neurons. Some of the most highly expressed genes at Nageotte nodules were peripherin, neurofilaments, tubulins, and other cytoskeletal mRNAs that are translated locally to support axonal growth ( Supplemental Table 3 ). The clustering approach reveals only subtle shifts in cell proportions but is consistent with histochemical observations and reveals differences in gene expression that may be important for interactions between cells in nodules and nearby neurons that sprout into the neurodegenerative area of the Nageotte nodule. These differences may also underlie different stages of Nageotte nodule formation that cannot be discerned in post-mortem samples. Consistent with the neurodegeneration phenotype we observed for DPN DRGs, we also observed a transcriptomic signal for disease associated glia 41 characterized by high expression of SPP1 , APOE , TYROBP , CTSL in Nageotte nodules ( Supplemental Table 3 ). Next, we utilized the spatial transcriptomic profiles of Nageotte nodules and local surviving neurons to investigate potential ligand-receptor interactions that could be ongoing between the cells forming Nageotte nodules and neighboring neurons. We did this analysis for each of the 5 clusters since they had differences in gene expression that could influence ligand-receptor interactions. The spatial barcodes are similar in size to sensory neurons (55 μm) and we have previously been able to achieve near-single neuron transcriptomic resolution with this approach 41 ; however, a limitation of the technology is that the neuronal barcodes do overlap with SGCs and other cells that ring the neurons. Thereby, some of the interactions may be representative of Nageotte ligands with receptors found on neurons and/or encircling SGCs/other cells. However, an interactome analysis can provide mechanistic insights into cellular interactions that could drive nociceptor activation, sprouting, or other cellular processes in diabetes, leading to the identification of new drug targets. First, we looked at differentially expressed ligand genes found in each cluster and examined interactions with receptors in nearby neuronal clusters. This revealed differences such as very high expression of SPP1 in cluster 1, high expression of CLU in cluster 3, and a large number of neuropeptides like CALCA , GAL , PENK and ADCYAP1 also in cluster 3. A potential explanation for this finding in cluster 3 is that it is enriched in actively sprouting nociceptor axons that harbor mRNAs that might be locally translated ( Fig 5A ). Next, we assessed interactions for each cluster looking at differentially expressed receptors within nodules compared to nearby neuronal ligands. Here we found an enrichment of integrin receptor signaling in cluster 1, and again observed a strong neuronal signature in cluster 3 with NTRK1-NGF signaling ( Supplemental Figure 10 ). Examining the most highly expressed ligands in Nageotte nodules paired with the most highly expressed receptors found in nearby neurons and then focusing on the top 50 interactions, we found striking similarities across the clusters suggesting that there are consistencies between them all among the most highly expressed genes ( Supplemental Fig 11 ). These included many interactions involved in neurite outgrowth or chemotaxis, such as CLU 47 , SPP1 47 , CLSTN1 48 , which were found in all the clusters, and NEGR1, which was found in clusters 2 and 4 49,50 ( Supplemental Fig 11 ). SPP1 , the gene encoding osteopontin, was recently identified by phospho-proteomics as highly phosphorylated at multiple sites within human DPN DRGs and proposed to be involved in ER stress and extracellular matrix remodeling in DPN neurons 51 . Osteopontin mRNA is robustly expressed in large diameter sensory neurons, SGCs, and Schwann cells in the normal, nondiabetic human DRG ( Supplemental Fig 12 ) and binds to many integrins and to CD44 to elicit different cellular functions such as cell migration, cell proliferation, cytokine production, and neurite outgrowth 52-56 . Our interactome data highlighted that osteopontin at Nageotte nodules may be interacting with CD44 found on nearby neurons ( Fig 5A, Supplemental Figure 11 ). We confirmed high levels of SPP1 expression in nodules with in situ hybridization ( Fig 5B ), CD44 was highly expressed in most human sensory neurons (~85%) and was also found on SGCs and Schwann cells ( Supplemental Fig 10 ), including those forming Nageotte nodules ( Fig 5B ). While there were many cytokines expressed in Nageotte nodules, SPP1 expression was robustly detected across clusters and was the most highly expressed of this gene family in nodules ( Fig 5C ). A recent study reported that SPP1 mRNA translation is dependent upon the phosphorylation of eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4E (eiF4E) 57 . Inhibition of mitogen activated protein kinase interacting kinase (MNK), the kinase that specifically phosphorylates eIF4E, suppresses ectopic activity in human sensory neurons recovered from individuals with radicular neuropathic pain 58 , and attenuates nociceptive behaviors in rodents with neuropathic pain 59-61 . We examined eIF4E phosphorylation in DPN DRGs and observed significantly increased eIF4E phosphorylation in DPN sensory neurons compared to non-diabetic controls ( Fig 5D-E ). Phosphorylated eIF4E was also detected in Nageotte nodules ( Fig 5F ). These findings suggest that signaling from Nageotte nodules to DRG neurons may influence the excitability state of these neurons, a common feature of neuropathic pain. Increased eIF4E signaling may also support increased osteopontin expression in DPN DRGs. Our findings give a new perspective on the mechanisms of DPN. We find extensive neuronal degeneration in the DRGs of organ donors with DPN with as many as 25% of neurons lost in people with DPN taking analgesics that are used to treat neuropathic pain. This neurodegeneration is directly linked to the formation of Nageotte nodules that are enriched in cells with gene expression patterns that likely drive axonal sprouting and other pathological changes in DRG neurons like hyperexcitability that causes pain in DPN. The current view is that axonal dieback that is associated with pain and sensory loss in DPN can be treated with therapies that protect axonal integrity. Our findings show that neurodegeneration is extensive in DPN, and early neuroprotective strategies are almost certainly needed to protect patients from irreversible damage to DRG neurons. Our work updates the pioneering work of Jean Nageotte, showing that the structures he described in the 1920s are a key pathology in the DRG in DPN. Applying the power of modern microscopy and RNA-sequencing technologies to Nageotte’s nodules gives insight into the richness of the underlying biology of these small, yet extraordinarily complex structures. We propose that the work of Jean Nageotte over 100 years ago may be key to understanding and treating the most common form of neuropathic pain on Earth, DPN. Materials and Methods Tissue Procurement All human tissue procurement procedures were approved by the Institutional Review Boards at the University of Texas at Dallas. Human DRGs were procured from organ donors through a collaboration with the Southwest Transplant Alliance. DRGs and other nervous tissues (sympathetic chain ganglia) were recovered using a ventral approach as previously described 34,62 . Upon removal from the body, DRGs were prepared three different ways. One, DRGs used for histology and sequencing work were frozen in pulverized dry ice, transferred into prechilled epitubes, and stored in a -80°C freezer. Two, DRGs used for neuronal dissociation were placed into freshly prepared artificial cerebral spinal fluid (aCSF) over ice. Three, DRGs used for transmission electron microscopy were placed into 4% paraformaldehyde for 48 hours at 4°C and then transferred to 1X Phosphate Buffered Saline (PBS) and shipped on ice to the University of Adelaide in Australia. A detailed protocol of the procurement process, including recipes for aCSF, can be found on protocols.io 34 . Donor medical history was provided by the Southwest Transplant Alliance and Anabios and includes medical details from the donor’s family members and hospital records. Donor demographics, medical history, and DRG level details (majority are lumbar DRGs) are provided in Supplementary Table 1 . The frozen DRGs were gradually embedded in OCT in a cryomold by adding small volumes of OCT over dry ice to avoid thawing. Tissues were sectioned on a cryostat and utilized for histology and spatial transcriptomics. After sectioning, the remaining tissue blocks were wrapped in tin foil, and then returned to the -80°C freezer for future use. Hematoxylin and Eosin staining, imaging, and analysis A single DRG from 90 organ donors was sectioned at 20μm onto SuperFrost Plus charged slides (Fisher Scientific; Cat 12-550-15). The donors were randomly selected from our tissue bank as part of routine tissue morphology checking as part of our quality control process. Lumbar DRGs were preferentially selected when available in our tissue bank, but in some cases lower thoracic DRGs were used. The DRG levels that were assessed are indicated in Supplementary Table 1. Sections were only briefly thawed in order to adhere to the slide but were immediately returned to the -20°C cryostat chamber until completion of sectioning. The slides were removed from the cryostat and immediately immersed in 10% formalin (Fisher Scientific; Cat 23-245684) for 15 minutes. The tissues were then sequentially dehydrated in 50% ethanol (5 min; Fisher Scientific; Cat 04-355-223), 70% ethanol (5 min), and two times in 100% ethanol (5 min) at room temperature. The slides were air dried briefly, and then each section was covered with isopropanol (Sigma; L9516) and incubated for 1 minute at room temperature. The excess isopropanol was removed, and the slides were allowed to air dry again briefly (< 5 minutes). Hematoxylin (Sigma; MHS16) was applied to each tissue section until covered and incubated for 7 minutes at room temperature. The excess Hematoxylin was removed by tapping, and the slides were immersed 30 times in ultrapure water (dipping into the water). Bluing Buffer (Agilent; CS70230-2) was applied to each tissue section until covered and incubated for 2 minutes at room temperature. The excess Bluing Buffer was removed by tapping, and the slides were immersed 5X in ultrapure water (dipping into the water). Eosin mix (1:10 of 0.45M Tris Acetic Acid Buffer to Eosin (Sigma; HT110216)) was applied to each tissue section until covered and incubated for 1 minute at room temperature. The excess Eosin mix was removed by tapping, and the slides were immersed 15X in ultrapure water (dipping into the water). The excess water was removed from the slide using a tapping motion and Kim wipe. The slides were allowed to completely air dry before being coverslipped with Prolong Gold Antifade (Fisher Scientific; Cat P36930). DRG sections were mosaically imaged at 10X using default brightfield settings on an Olympus vs120 slide scanner. The raw images were opened in CellSens (Olympus; v1.18) and qualitatively scored for the presence of Nageotte nodules throughout the entire DRG section. A qualitative scoring system (ranked from high to very low) was developed by comparing sections to one another and noting the extremes: DRG sections that had an abundance of Nageotte nodules (high) versus those with very little-to-none (very low). The person analyzing was blinded to the donor’s demographics and medical history. Once each section was scored, the medical information from each donor was probed and grouped into categories based on diagnoses of diabetes or other pain conditions. The diabetes diagnosis is known for each donor as insulin is monitored while the donors are on life support. There were 5 categories of donors: diabetics with indices for peripheral neuropathy (medical history statements of having peripheral neuropathy and/or amputation), diabetics taking analgesics (analgesic(s) usage indicated in medical history with no obvious signs of drug abuse/addiction), diabetics not taking analgesics (no history of taking analgesics, drug abuse/addiction included), non-diabetics (no DRG-affiliated pain condition, and no diabetes), non-diabetics with other pain conditions (fibromyalgia, arthritis, neuropathy, back pain as indicated in medical history). The donors included in each category are indicated in Supplemental Table 1 . Pre-mounted section Immunofluorescence staining, imaging, and analysis 3-4 20μm tissue sections (technical replicates) were acquired from each DRG (sample sizes indicated in figure captions) and placed onto SuperFrost Plus charged slides (Fisher Scientific; Cat 12-550-15). Slides were removed from the cryostat and immediately transferred to cold 10% formalin (pH 7.4) for 15 minutes. The tissues were then dehydrated in 50% ethanol (5 min), 70% ethanol (5 min), 100% ethanol (5 min), 100% ethanol (5 min) at room temperature. The slides were air dried briefly and then boundaries were drawn around each section using a hydrophobic pen (ImmEdge PAP pen, Vector Labs). When hydrophobic boundaries had dried, the slides were submerged in blocking buffer (10% Normal Goat Serum, 0.3% Triton-X 100 in 1X PBS) for 1 hour at room temperature. Slides were then rinsed in 1X PBS, placed in a light-protected humidity-controlled tray and incubated in primary antibody diluted in blocking buffer overnight at 4°C. A list of all primary and secondary antibodies is shown in Supplementary Table 5 . The next day, slides were washed in 1X PBS and then incubated in their respective secondary antibody (1:2000) with DAPI (1:5000; Cayman Chemical; Cat # 14285) diluted in blocking buffer for 1 hour at room temperature. The sections were washed in 1X PBS and then covered with True Black (diluted at 1:20 in 70% Ethanol; Biotium; 23014), a blocker of lipofuscin, for 1 minute. Sections were then rinsed vigorously with ultrapure water, and then washed in 1X PBS. The slides were then air dried and coverslipped with Prolong Gold Antifade reagent. A negative control consisting of 1 section from each DRG was processed in every immunohistochemistry experiment and was exposed to all of the same reagents except for primary antibody. DRG sections were imaged on a vs120 slide scanner (Evident Scientific) or an FV3000 or FV4000 confocal microscope (Evident Scientific) at 10X, 20X, 40X, 60X, or 100X magnification as indicated in the figure captions. The acquisition parameters were set based on guidelines for the vs120, FV3000, and FV4000 provided by Evident Scientific. The raw image files were brightened and contrasted in Olympus CellSens software (v1.18) for display purposes. For quantification and DPN vs non-diabetic comparisons experiments, all acquisition and brightness/contrast adjustment parameters were kept the same in order to make direct comparisons between samples. For the Nageotte nodule quantification experiment (GFAP + Peripherin IHC), all neurons with a visible cytoplasm (peripherin+) were counted and all of the Nageotte nodules were counted (cluster of DAPI+ nuclei and GFAP+ signal) in Olympus CellSens (v1.18). The percentage of neurons with a Nageotte nodule morphology was calculated by dividing the Nageotte nodule counts by the total neuronal population (sum of Nageotte nodules and neurons) and multiplying by 100. Three 20X mosaic sections (vs120) were analyzed per donor, and then the final percentages from each section were averaged for each donor. For peripherin fiber density analysis, a single 10X confocal image (FV3000) was acquired for each section of DRG (three sections total from each DRG, 3 images/donor). A single negative control DRG section from each donor (exposed to all reagents except for primary antibody) was imaged with the same settings. The neuron-rich area of the DRG was manually outlined in Olympus CellSens (v1.18) and its area was provided by the software. The peripherin signal within the neuron-rich area was autodetected using the Count and Measure feature in Olympus CellSens (v1.18). The peripherin signal within the soma of the neurons was then manually removed in the software. The remaining area of peripherin signal (axonal only) was provided by the CellSens software (v1.18) and divided by the neuron-rich area for each section and then averaged across all sections for each DRG. For the p-eIF4E experiment analysis, a mosaically tiled 20X image (Evident Scientific, vs120) was acquired for each section of DRG (three sections total from each DRG, 3 images/donor). A single negative control DRG section from each donor (exposed to all reagents except for primary antibody) was imaged with the same settings. The cell body of all neurons within the field of view were manually outlined using the Closed Polygon tool in Olympus CellSens (v1.18) and the software output the mean fluorescence intensity of the p-eIF4E signal within the ROI. This was performed on both the experimental and negative control sections. For each donor, the final p-eIF4E mean fluorescence intensity value was corrected by subtracting the mean fluorescence intensity value of the negative control. Filament Tracing and Free-floating Immunofluorescence staining A DPN donor with the highest Nageotte score (Donor #6) was selected for filament tracing in order to grant the highest likelihood of tracing Nageotte nodule fibers to their point of origin. For free-floating immunofluorescence staining, 50 μm DRG sections were acquired on a cryostat and then immediately submerged in 10% formalin (pH 7.4) in a 24-well plate. The sections were fixed for 15 minutes, and then washed in an adjacent well containing 1X PBS. The sections were then transferred to a well containing blocking solution (10% Normal Goat Serum, 0.3% Triton-X 100 in 1X PBS) for 1 hour at room temperature before being transferred to primary antibody (peripherin, Supplementary Table 5 ) diluted in blocking solution over night at 4°C. The next day, the sections were washed in 1X PBS, and then placed into a well containing secondary antibody (1:2000, Supplementary Table 5) with DAPI (1:5000) diluted in blocking buffer for 1 hour at room temperature while being shielded from light. The sections were then washed in 1X PBS, mounted onto slides, and treated with True Black (diluted at 1:20 in 70% Ethanol; Biotium; 23014) for 1 minute. Sections were then rinsed vigorously with ultrapure water, and then washed in 1X PBS. The slides were then air dried and coverslipped with Prolong Gold Antifade reagent. 60X z-stack images with optimal z-slices (0.3 μm) of the entire z plane were acquired on an FV4000 confocal microscope (Evident Scientific). The images were loaded into Imaris (v10), converted to IMS files, and then the peripherin signal was traced using the semi-automatic filament tracing tool. Starting points were manually selected at fibers within the Nageotte nodules, and at a neighboring neuron’s soma. The fibers were traced using the semi-automatic filament path finding tool which path finds continuous peripherin signal through the z-plane. Only fibers that originated from the Nageotte nodule arborizations or the neuronal soma and had paths that were continuously autodetected through the z-plane were traced. Other axons in the image that were not traced were either discontinuous or did not originate from the designated starting points. RNAscope in situ hybridization staining, imaging, and analysis DRGs were sectioned at 20μm onto SuperFrost Plus charged slides (Fisher Scientific; Cat 12-550-15). Sections were only briefly thawed in order to adhere to the slide but were immediately returned to the -20°C cryostat chamber until completion of sectioning. The slides were removed from the cryostat and immediately immersed in cold (4°C) 10% formalin (Fisher Scientific; Cat 23-245684) for 15 minutes. The tissues were then sequentially dehydrated in 50% ethanol (5 min; Fisher Scientific; Cat 04-355-223), 70% ethanol (5 min), and two times in 100% ethanol (5 min) at room temperature. The slides were air dried briefly and then boundaries were drawn around each section using a hydrophobic pen (ImmEdge PAP pen; Vector Labs). Once the hydrophobic boundaries had dried, the slides were immediately processed for RNAscope in situ hybridization. RNAscope in situ hybridization multiplex version 2 (Advanced Cell Diagnostics; Cat 323100) was conducted on human DRGs using the fresh frozen protocol as described by ACD (acdbio; manual # 323100-USM with rev date: 02272019). Hydrogen Peroxide (ACD; Cat 322381) was applied to each section until fully covered and incubated for 10 minutes at room temperature. The slides were then washed in distilled water and then were incubated one at a time in Protease III reagent (ACD; Cat 322381) for 10 seconds at room temperature. The protease incubation time was optimized as recommended by ACD for the tissue and specific lot of Protease reagent. Slides were washed briefly in 1X phosphate buffered saline (PBS, pH 7.4) at room temperature. Each slide was then placed in a prewarmed humidity control tray (ACD; Cat 321710) containing dampened filter paper (ThermoFisher Scientific; Cat 84784) and a mixture of Channel 1, Channel 2, and Channel 3 probes (50:1:1 dilution as directed by ACD due to stock concentrations) was pipetted onto each section until fully covered. This was performed one slide at a time to avoid liquid evaporation and section drying. The humidity control tray containing the slides was placed in a HybEZ oven (ACD; Cat 321710) for 2 hours at 40°C. A table of all probes used is shown in Supplementary Table 5 . Following probe incubation, the slides were washed two times in 1X RNAscope wash buffer (ACD; Cat 310091) and then placed in 5X SSC buffer (Sigma; Cat S6639) over night at room temperature. The following morning, the slides were washed two times in 1X RNAscope wash buffer (ACD; Cat 310091) and placed in the 40°C oven for 30 minutes after submersion in AMP-1 reagent. Washes and amplification were repeated using AMP-2 and AMP-3 reagents with a 30-minute and 15-minute incubation period, respectively. HRP-C1 reagent was applied to all sections and then incubated in the oven at 40°C for 15 minutes. The slides were then washed in 1X RNAscope wash buffer (ACD; Cat 310091). TSA Plus Akoya Dyes in Fluorescin, Cyanine-3, and Cyanine-5 (Akoya; NEL741001KT, NEL744001KT, NEL745001KT) were prepared at 1:1000 in TSA buffer (ACD; Cat 322809). The Akoya dye assigned to Channel 1 probe was applied to each section until fully covered and incubated for 30 minutes in the 40°C oven. The slides were washed and then covered in HRP blocker (ACD; Cat 323110) for 15 minutes at 40°C. The slides were washed again and then the same steps were repeated using HRP-C2 and HRP-C3 reagents with their assigned Akoya dye. DAPI (ACD; Cat 323110) was applied to each section for 1 minute at room temperature and then washed in 1X PBS (pH 7.4) before being washed, air dried, and cover-slipped (Globe Scientific; Cat 1415-15) with Prolong Gold Antifade mounting medium (Fisher Scientific; Cat P36930). A positive and negative control was run on a single section from each DRG for every RNAscope experiment. The positive control probe cocktail ( Supplementary Table 5 ) contains probes for high, medium and low-expressing mRNAs that are present in all cells (ubiquitin C > Peptidyl-prolyl cis-trans isomerase B > DNA-directed RNA polymerase II subunit RPB1) and allows us to gauge tissue quality and experiment conditions. All tissues showed robust signal for all 3 positive control probes. A negative control probe against the bacterial DapB gene ( Supplementary Table 5 ) was used to check for lipofuscin and background label. DRG sections were imaged on an FV3000 or FV4000 confocal microscope (Evident Scientific) at 10X, 20X, 40X or 60X magnification as indicated in the figure captions. The acquisition parameters were set based on guidelines for the FV3000 and FV4000 provided by Evident Scientific. The raw image files were analyzed in CellSens (Olympus; v1.18). The True black lipofuscin quencher (used in Immunofluorescence) is not compatible with RNAscope. Large globular structures and/or signal that auto fluoresced in all channels (particularly brightest in 488 and 555 wavelengths) was considered to be background lipofuscin and was not analyzed. Aside from adjusting brightness/contrast, we performed no digital image processing to subtract background. Transmission electron microscopy tissue preparation, staining, and imaging Upon receipt from UTDallas, the DRGs were cut into smaller pieces of about 1 mm 3 in size, fixed in 2.5% glutaraldehyde 2.5 % in phosphate buffer, pH 7.4 at 4°C for 24 hours, washed in PBS, and transferred into 2% aqueous osmium tetroxide solution for 1 hour. The samples were then dehydrated in a graded series of ethanol and embedded in TAAB epon araldite embedding medium at 60°C for 48 hours. Ultrathin sections of 70-90 nm thickness were cut using a ultramicrotome (Leica), stained with 4% uranyl acetate and Reynolds lead citrate for 8 minutes and examined using an electron microscope (FEI Tecnai 120kV Spirit). Images were captured using an AMT Camera with AMT_V7.0.1 software. Dissociated neuronal cultures and Immunocytochemistry After procurement, DRGs (donors 91 and 92, Supplemental Table 1 ) in aCSF were transported to the lab over ice (~30 minutes). The DRGs were trimmed of excess connective tissue, fat, and nerve roots to expose the DRG bulb. The DRG bulb was then cut into 3mm sections and placed in 5mL of pre-warmed digestion enzyme containing 1 mg/mL of Stemzyme I (Worthington Biochemical, LS004106), 0.1 mg/mL of DNAse I (Worthington Biochemical, LS002139), and 10ng/mL of recombinant human β-NGF (R&D Systems, 256-GF) in HBSS without calcium and magnesium (Thermo Scientific, 14170-112). The tubes were placed in a 37° C shaking water bath until the DRG sections dissociated (4-10 hours). The solution was then filtered through a 100µm mesh strainer. The resultant cell suspension was then gently added to a 15mL tube containing 3mL of 10% Bovine Serum Albumin (Biopharm, 71-040) in HBSS. The tubes were then centrifuged at 900g for 5 min at room temperature. The supernatant was aspirated, and the pellet was resuspended in prewarmed BrainPhys ® media (Stemcell technologies, 05790) containing 1% penicillin/streptomycin (Thermo Fisher Scientific, 15070063), 1% Glutamax (Thermo Scientific, 35050061), 2% NeuroCult SM1 (Stemcell technologies, 05711), 2% HyClone™ Fetal Bovine Serum (Thermo Fisher Scientific, SH3008803IR), 1% N-2 (Thermo Scientific, 17502048), 0.1% 5-Fluoro-2′-deoxyuridine (FRDU, Sigma-Aldrich, F0503), and 10ng/ml of β-NGF. Cells were plated in a 24 well plate containing 12mm coverslips which were pre-coated with 0.1mg/mL of poly-D-lysine at a seeding density of 100 neurons per well. Cells were incubated at 37°C and 5% CO2 for 3 hours to allow for adherence. Following neuron adherence, wells were flooded with 1mL of prewarmed media, and half media changes were performed every other day. On DIV 3 (donor 91) and DIV 5 (donor 92), cells were washed with 1X PBS and fixed with 10% formalin for 10 min at room temperature. Cells were then washed 3 times with 1X PBS and blocked with 10% normal goat serum in PBS for 1 hour at room temperature. Cells were then permeabilized with 10% Normal Goat Serum and 0.3% Triton X in PBS for 30 min at room temperature. To label neurons, cells were incubated with peripherin (1:1000, Supplemental Table 5 ) diluted in blocking buffer overnight at 4°C. The next day cells were washed 3 times with 1X PBS and incubated with a goat anti-chicken 488 secondary antibody (1:2000) and DAPI (1:5000, Cayman Chemical, 14285) diluted in blocking buffer for 1 hour at room temperature. Cells were washed with 1X PBS and then covered with True Black (diluted at 1:20 in 70% Ethanol; Biotium; 23014), a blocker of lipofuscin, for 1 minute. The cells were washed again in 1X PBS. Coverslips were lifted out of the 24 well plate and mounted onto glass slides with Prolong Gold Antifade reagent (Fisher Scientific, P36930). A negative control coverslip was processed similarly in each experiment but was not exposed to the primary antibody. All images were taken on an Olympus FV3000 confocal microscope at the University of Texas at Dallas. Graphing and Statistical Analyses Graphs were generated using GraphPad Prism version 8.4.3 (GraphPad Software, Inc. San Diego, CA USA). Statistical analyses (either t-test or one-way ANOVA) were run in GraphPad Prism as indicated in the figure captions. Sample size is also indicated on the graphs and/or figure captions. Graphical figures were made in Biorender. Box-and-whisker plots were generated with the R ggplot2 package to visualize expression of genes in Nageotte nodule barcodes. Dot/bubble plots were generated with the DotPlot() function in Seurat (v5.0.3) to visualize expression of genes in the VISIUM data. Spatial transcriptomics VISIUM tissue optimization and spatial gene expression protocols were followed exactly as described by 10x Genomics (https://www.10xgenomics.com/) using Haematoxylin and Eosin as the counterstain. Optimal permeabilization time was obtained at 12 min incubation with permeabilization enzyme 41 . Imaging was conducted on an Olympus vs120 slide scanner. mRNA library preparation and sequencing (Illumina Novaseq, NextSeq 500, Nextseq 2000) were done at the Genome Center in the University of Texas at Dallas Research Core Facilities. DRGs from 6 DPN donors were used and processed in three separate VISIUM experiments (donors 1-4, 6, 14). The donor demographic information is provided in Supplementary Table 1. Raw sequencing files were processed with the 10X Genomics SpaceRanger pipeline (versions 1.1.0, 1.3.0, and 2.0.0) to generate count matrices of gene expression per VISIUM barcode for 16 DRG sections from 6 donors. VISIUM sections were examined on Loupe Browser (10X Genomics) to select for barcodes that overlapped Nageotte nodules and nearby neurons (one barcode away from Nageotte nodule). Any Nageotte nodule barcodes that also overlapped with a neuronal soma were excluded. 1094 Nageotte nodule barcodes and 1087 nearby neuronal barcodes were selected. Spatial sequencing metrics can be found in Supplementary Table 6 . Spatial RNA-seq analysis Gene expression analysis of the barcodes was done with R (version 4.3.3) and consisted of quantification of gene expression in Nageotte Nodules, Enrichr analysis of top genes, spatial deconvolution, clustering of Nageotte nodule barcodes, and interactome analysis. Analysis of Gene Expression and Top Genes in Nageotte Nodules The raw counts from all nodule barcodes were pseudo bulked and normalized to library size, to generate counts per million (CPM) values for each gene in the Nageotte nodule barcodes. As the 10X VISIUM assay library preparation does not have a gene length bias, the CPM values were deemed sufficient to allow comparisons between genes. A recently published dataset from our group of single-nuclei RNA-sequencing from human DRGs 63 was used with Seurat’s FindAllMarkers() to determine a list of neuronally enriched genes using the following criteria: 1) a difference of at least 0.1 when subtracting the percentage of non-neuronal cells that express the gene from the percentage of neurons that express the gene, 2) at least 2-fold increase between the number of non-neurons that express the gene and the number of neurons that express the gene, 3) adj. p-value 0.05 in every other cell type. This list was intersected with the filtered Nageotte nodule gene expression table to generate a table with 609 neuronally enriched genes, and a table with 15651 non-enriched genes. Enrichr Analysis The complete gene expression table was filtered to include only protein-coding genes and exclude genes from the mitochondrial chromosome and those that code for ribosomal proteins. After filtering, the gene expression values were re-normalized to sum one million. The top 300 genes were analyzed with Enrichr to determine ontology terms enriched in the gene set in the following databases: 1) MGI Mammalian Phenotype Level 4 2021, 2) GO Molecular Function 2023, 3) GO Biological Process 2023, 4) GO Cellular Compartment 2023. Spatial Deconvolution All barcodes from the 16 sections with greater than 200 unique genes were processed with SONAR 64 to predict cell type proportions using a signature matrix of marker genes per cell type. The signature matrix was generated by subsetting the raw count matrix of a single-nuclei dataset of human DRG cells to include only those genes that were highly enriched in a cell type (log-fold change > 1.0, expression in > 50% of cells, and adj. p-value < 10 -20 ). Deconvolution results were used to estimate the contribution of different cell types to the transcriptomes of barcodes with Nageotte nodules, adjacent neurons, and all other barcodes (barcodes that overlapped both nodules and neurons were excluded from all 3 categories). They were also used to predict cell type composition of the different clusters of Nageotte nodules. Clustering of Nageotte nodule barcodes The SCT pipeline from Seurat (version 5.0.3), followed by Harmony integration and FindNeighbors()/FindClusters(), was used to perform unsupervised clustering of the Nageotte nodule barcodes. A UMAP plot of the clustering with cells labeled by donor was used to confirm that the Nageotte barcodes did not exhibit donor-specific groupings. The cells in each cluster were pseudo bulked to obtain expression in CPM for all genes per cluster and FindMarkers() was used to determine enriched genes per cluster. Interactome Analysis To explore potential signaling mechanisms between Nageotte nodules and neighboring neurons, reads from neuronal barcodes adjacent to the nodules were pseudo bulked and normalized to CPM. A curated ligand-receptor database and interactome platform (https://sensoryomics.shinyapps.io/Interactome/; 65 ) were used to hypothesize interactions with ligands from each Nageotte nodule cluster and receptors on the neurons adjacent to nodules. In the first interactome analysis, to determine the top potential interactions per cluster, the interactions were ranked based on the sum of the ligand and receptor CPM expression values. In the second analysis, to determine interactions that may be more prominent for each cluster, only ligand genes that were differentially expressed (adj. p-value <0.05) in each cluster were used. Lastly, we also observed potential interactions with ligands from the surrounding neurons and receptors on the nodules (using only those receptor genes that were enriched in a cluster with adj. p-value <0.05). Ligand and receptor genes were also labeled with the protein class of their gene product using the PANTHER database 66 . Declarations Acknowledgements: The authors thank the organ donors and their families for their gift, members of the Southwest Transplant Alliance for supporting the tissue recovery work, and members of the Price lab for useful discussions. Funding: This work was funded by NIH grants U19NS130 6 08 and R01NS111929. Author Contributions: SS and TJP wrote the manuscript, SS did the histology experiments, DTF/IS/SS conducted spatial transcriptomics, KM and AW analyzed the spatial sequencing data, RH conducted electron microscopy experiments, JL conducted the cell culture experiments, GD provided scientific/experimental input, AC/GF/PH/EV recovered DRGs from organ donors. Competing interests: TJP is a co-founder of 4E Therapeutics. The authors declare no other competing interests related to this work. Data and materials availability: All sequencing data will be deposited at SPARC and code will be made publically available on GitHub. Materials & Correspondence : All correspondence and material requests can be made to Theodore Price. References Nageotte, J. L'organisation de la matiere dans ses rapports avec la vie: etudes d'anatomie generale et de morphologie experimentale sur le tissu conjonctif et le nerf . (F. Alcan, 1922). Lakritz, J. R. et al. An oral form of methylglyoxal-bis-guanylhydrazone reduces monocyte activation and traffic to the dorsal root ganglia in a primate model of HIV-peripheral neuropathy. J Neurovirol 23 , 568-576, doi:10.1007/s13365-017-0529-9 (2017). Lakritz, J. R. et al. alpha4-Integrin Antibody Treatment Blocks Monocyte/Macrophage Traffic to, Vascular Cell Adhesion Molecule-1 Expression in, and Pathology of the Dorsal Root Ganglia in an SIV Macaque Model of HIV-Peripheral Neuropathy. Am J Pathol 186 , 1754-1761, doi:10.1016/j.ajpath.2016.03.007 (2016). Burdo, T. H., Orzechowski, K., Knight, H. L., Miller, A. D. & Williams, K. Dorsal root ganglia damage in SIV-infected rhesus macaques: an animal model of HIV-induced sensory neuropathy. Am J Pathol 180 , 1362-1369, doi:10.1016/j.ajpath.2011.12.016 (2012). Lakritz, J. R. et al. Monocyte Traffic, Dorsal Root Ganglion Histopathology, and Loss of Intraepidermal Nerve Fiber Density in SIV Peripheral Neuropathy. Am J Pathol 185 , 1912-1923, doi:10.1016/j.ajpath.2015.03.007 (2015). Marshall, A. & Duchen, L. W. Sensory system involvement in infantile spinal muscular atrophy. J Neurol Sci 26 , 349-359, doi:10.1016/0022-510x(75)90207-5 (1975). Sonoda, K. et al. TAR DNA-binding protein 43 pathology in a case clinically diagnosed with facial-onset sensory and motor neuronopathy syndrome: an autopsied case report and a review of the literature. J Neurol Sci 332 , 148-153, doi:10.1016/j.jns.2013.06.027 (2013). Fratkin, J. D., Leis, A. A., Stokic, D. S., Slavinski, S. A. & Geiss, R. W. Spinal cord neuropathology in human West Nile virus infection. Arch Pathol Lab Med 128 , 533-537, doi:10.5858/2004-128-533-SCNIHW (2004). Bakchine, S. et al. [Central and peripheral neurologic lesions in primary Gougerot-Sjogren syndrome. Clinicopathological study of a case]. Rev Neurol (Paris) 147 , 368-375 (1991). Yoshida, M. [Neuropathology of proximal-dominant hereditary motor and sensory neuropathy (HMSN-P)]. Rinsho Shinkeigaku 23 , 1200-1202, doi:10.5692/clinicalneurol.53.1200 (2013). Scaravilli, F., Giometto, B., Chimelli, L. & Sinclair, E. Macrophages in human sensory ganglia: an immunohistochemical and ultrastructural study. J Neurocytol 20 , 609-624, doi:10.1007/BF01215268 (1991). Powers, J. M. et al. The dorsal root ganglia in adrenomyeloneuropathy: neuronal atrophy and abnormal mitochondria. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol 60 , 493-501, doi:10.1093/jnen/60.5.493 (2001). Pandya, S. S. & Bhatki, W. S. Severe pan-sensory neuropathy in leprosy. Int J Lepr Other Mycobact Dis 62 , 24-31 (1994). Umehara, F., Izumo, S., Zyounosono, M. & Osame, M. An autopsied case of the Crow-Fukase syndrome: a neuropathological study with emphasis on spinal roots. Acta Neuropathol 80 , 563-567, doi:10.1007/BF00294621 (1990). Reske-Nielsen, E., Reintoft, I. & Bomers, K. Dorsal root gangliopathia presenting with rapidly progressing sensory polyneuropathy. Clin Neuropathol 15 , 7-12 (1996). Lhermitte, F., Gray, F., Lyon-Caen, O., Pertuiset, B. F. & Bernard, P. [Paralysis of digestive tract with lesions of myenteric plexuses. A new paraneoplastic syndrome (author's transl)]. Rev Neurol (Paris) 136 , 825-836 (1980). Makino, M., Hiwatashi, D., Minemura, K. & Kawaguchi, K. Autonomic and sensory ganglionopathy occurring in a patient with fulminant type 1 diabetes mellitus. Pathol Int 66 , 102-107, doi:10.1111/pin.12373 (2016). Yoshioka, M. et al. Expression of HIV-1 and interleukin-6 in lumbosacral dorsal root ganglia of patients with AIDS. Neurology 44 , 1120-1130, doi:10.1212/wnl.44.6.1120 (1994). Bradley, W. G. et al. Morphometric analysis of the peripheral neuropathy of AIDS. Muscle Nerve 21 , 1188-1195, doi:10.1002/(sici)1097-4598(199809)21:93.0.co;2-o (1998). Scaravilli, F. et al. The pathology of the posterior root ganglia in AIDS and its relationship to the pallor of the gracile tract. Acta Neuropathol 84 , 163-170, doi:10.1007/BF00311390 (1992). Nagano, I. et al. Increased NADPH-diaphorase reactivity and cytokine expression in dorsal root ganglia in acquired immunodeficiency syndrome. J Neurol Sci 136 , 117-128, doi:10.1016/0022-510x(95)00317-u (1996). Nokura, K. et al. Acute motor and sensory neuronopathy associated with small-cell lung cancer: a clinicopathological study. Neuropathology 26 , 329-337, doi:10.1111/j.1440-1789.2006.00698.x (2006). Amiel, H. et al. [Neuropathy caused by cisplatin. 7 cases including one with an autopsy study]. Ann Med Interne (Paris) 138 , 96-100 (1987). Krarup-Hansen, A. et al. Histology and platinum content of sensory ganglia and sural nerves in patients treated with cisplatin and carboplatin: an autopsy study. Neuropathol Appl Neurobiol 25 , 29-40, doi:10.1046/j.1365-2990.1999.00160.x (1999). Rath-Wolfson, L. et al. Morphological changes in peri-prostatic sympathetic ganglion cells in aging males. Mol Clin Oncol 6 , 713-717, doi:10.3892/mco.2017.1196 (2017). Schmidt, R. E. et al. Dystrophic axonal swellings develop as a function of age and diabetes in human dorsal root ganglia. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol 56 , 1028-1043, doi:10.1097/00005072-199709000-00008 (1997). Peters, C. M., Jimenez-Andrade, J. M., Kuskowski, M. A., Ghilardi, J. R. & Mantyh, P. W. An evolving cellular pathology occurs in dorsal root ganglia, peripheral nerve and spinal cord following intravenous administration of paclitaxel in the rat. Brain Res 1168 , 46-59, doi:10.1016/j.brainres.2007.06.066 (2007). Schionning, J. D. & Danscher, G. Autometallographic mercury correlates with degenerative changes in dorsal root ganglia of rats intoxicated with organic mercury. APMIS 107 , 303-310, doi:10.1111/j.1699-0463.1999.tb01558.x (1999). Eid, S. A. et al. New perspectives in diabetic neuropathy. Neuron 111 , 2623-2641, doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2023.05.003 (2023). Serra, J. et al. Microneurographic identification of spontaneous activity in C-nociceptors in neuropathic pain states in humans and rats. Pain 153 , 42-55, doi:10.1016/j.pain.2011.08.015 (2012). Kleggetveit, I. P. et al. High spontaneous activity of C-nociceptors in painful polyneuropathy. Pain 153 , 2040-2047, doi:10.1016/j.pain.2012.05.017 (2012). Orstavik, K. et al. Abnormal function of C-fibers in patients with diabetic neuropathy. J Neurosci 26 , 11287-11294, doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2659-06.2006 (2006). Serra, J. et al. Effects of a T-type calcium channel blocker, ABT-639, on spontaneous activity in C-nociceptors in patients with painful diabetic neuropathy: a randomized controlled trial. Pain 156 , 2175-2183, doi:10.1097/j.pain.0000000000000249 (2015). Shiers, S., Yousuf, M. S., Mwirigi, J., Cervantes, A. & Price, T. Human Ganglia and Spinal Cord Tissue Procurement from Organ Donors and Tissue Quality Assessment. protocols.io , doi:10.17504/protocols.io.kqdg32qr1v25/v1 (2024). Konnova, E. A. et al. Characterisation of GFAP-Expressing Glial Cells in the Dorsal Root Ganglion after Spared Nerve Injury. Int J Mol Sci 24 , doi:10.3390/ijms242115559 (2023). McLachlan, E. M., Janig, W., Devor, M. & Michaelis, M. Peripheral nerve injury triggers noradrenergic sprouting within dorsal root ganglia. Nature 363 , 543-546, doi:10.1038/363543a0 (1993). Chung, K., Lee, B. H., Yoon, Y. W. & Chung, J. M. Sympathetic sprouting in the dorsal root ganglia of the injured peripheral nerve in a rat neuropathic pain model. J Comp Neurol 376 , 241-252, doi:10.1002/(SICI)1096-9861(19961209)376:23.0.CO;2-3 (1996). Shinder, V. et al. Structural basis of sympathetic-sensory coupling in rat and human dorsal root ganglia following peripheral nerve injury. J Neurocytol 28 , 743-761, doi:10.1023/a:1007090105840 (1999). Shiers, S., Klein, R. M. & Price, T. J. Quantitative differences in neuronal subpopulations between mouse and human dorsal root ganglia demonstrated with RNAscope in situ hybridization. Pain , doi:10.1097/j.pain.0000000000001973 (2020). Shiers, S. I. et al. Convergence of peptidergic and non-peptidergic protein markers in the human dorsal root ganglion and spinal dorsal horn. J Comp Neurol 529 , 2771-2788, doi:10.1002/cne.25122 (2021). Tavares-Ferreira, D. et al. Spatial transcriptomics of dorsal root ganglia identifies molecular signatures of human nociceptors. Sci Transl Med 14 , eabj8186, doi:10.1126/scitranslmed.abj8186 (2022). Hall, B. E. et al. Transcriptomic analysis of human sensory neurons in painful diabetic neuropathy reveals inflammation and neuronal loss. Sci Rep 12 , 4729, doi:10.1038/s41598-022-08100-8 (2022). Toth, C., Brussee, V., Cheng, C. & Zochodne, D. W. Diabetes mellitus and the sensory neuron. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol 63 , 561-573, doi:10.1093/jnen/63.6.561 (2004). Britsch, S. et al. The transcription factor Sox10 is a key regulator of peripheral glial development. Genes Dev 15 , 66-78, doi:10.1101/gad.186601 (2001). Finzsch, M. et al. Sox10 is required for Schwann cell identity and progression beyond the immature Schwann cell stage. J Cell Biol 189 , 701-712, doi:10.1083/jcb.200912142 (2010). van Velzen, M. et al. Neuron-interacting satellite glial cells in human trigeminal ganglia have an APC phenotype. J Immunol 183 , 2456-2461, doi:10.4049/jimmunol.0900890 (2009). Wright, M. C. et al. Novel roles for osteopontin and clusterin in peripheral motor and sensory axon regeneration. J Neurosci 34 , 1689-1700, doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3822-13.2014 (2014). Lee, T. J., Lee, J. W., Haynes, E. M., Eliceiri, K. W. & Halloran, M. C. The Kinesin Adaptor Calsyntenin-1 Organizes Microtubule Polarity and Regulates Dynamics during Sensory Axon Arbor Development. Front Cell Neurosci 11 , 107, doi:10.3389/fncel.2017.00107 (2017). Singh, K. et al. Neuronal Growth and Behavioral Alterations in Mice Deficient for the Psychiatric Disease-Associated Negr1 Gene. Front Mol Neurosci 11 , 30, doi:10.3389/fnmol.2018.00030 (2018). Pischedda, F. et al. A cell surface biotinylation assay to reveal membrane-associated neuronal cues: Negr1 regulates dendritic arborization. Mol Cell Proteomics 13 , 733-748, doi:10.1074/mcp.M113.031716 (2014). Doty, M. et al. Integrative multiomic analyses of dorsal root ganglia in diabetic neuropathic pain using proteomics, phospho-proteomics, and metabolomics. Sci Rep 12 , 17012, doi:10.1038/s41598-022-21394-y (2022). Vogelezang, M. G. et al. Alpha4 integrin is expressed during peripheral nerve regeneration and enhances neurite outgrowth. J Neurosci 21 , 6732-6744, doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.21-17-06732.2001 (2001). Hikita, S. T. et al. Integrin alpha4beta1 (VLA-4) expression and activity in retinal and peripheral neurons. Mol Cell Neurosci 23 , 427-439, doi:10.1016/s1044-7431(03)00065-4 (2003). Icer, M. A. & Gezmen-Karadag, M. The multiple functions and mechanisms of osteopontin. Clin Biochem 59 , 17-24, doi:10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2018.07.003 (2018). Yim, A., Smith, C. & Brown, A. M. Osteopontin/secreted phosphoprotein-1 harnesses glial-, immune-, and neuronal cell ligand-receptor interactions to sense and regulate acute and chronic neuroinflammation. Immunol Rev 311 , 224-233, doi:10.1111/imr.13081 (2022). Lund, S. A., Giachelli, C. M. & Scatena, M. The role of osteopontin in inflammatory processes. J Cell Commun Signal 3 , 311-322, doi:10.1007/s12079-009-0068-0 (2009). Brina, D. et al. The Akt/mTOR and MNK/eIF4E pathways rewire the prostate cancer translatome to secrete HGF, SPP1 and BGN and recruit suppressive myeloid cells. Nat Cancer 4 , 1102-1121, doi:10.1038/s43018-023-00594-z (2023). Li, Y. et al. MNK inhibitor eFT508 (Tomivosertib) suppresses ectopic activity in human dorsal root ganglion neurons from dermatomes with radicular neuropathic pain. bioRxiv , doi:10.1101/2023.06.13.544811 (2023). Shiers, S. et al. Reversal of peripheral nerve injury-induced neuropathic pain and cognitive dysfunction via genetic and tomivosertib targeting of MNK. Neuropsychopharmacology 45 , 524-533, doi:10.1038/s41386-019-0537-y (2020). Agalave, N. M., Mody, P. H., Szabo-Pardi, T. A., Jeong, H. S. & Burton, M. D. Neuroimmune Consequences of eIF4E Phosphorylation on Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy. Front Immunol 12 , 642420, doi:10.3389/fimmu.2021.642420 (2021). Megat, S. et al. Nociceptor Translational Profiling Reveals the Ragulator-Rag GTPase Complex as a Critical Generator of Neuropathic Pain. J Neurosci 39 , 393-411, doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2661-18.2018 (2019). Valtcheva, M. V. et al. Surgical extraction of human dorsal root ganglia from organ donors and preparation of primary sensory neuron cultures. Nat Protoc 11 , 1877-1888, doi:10.1038/nprot.2016.111 (2016). Bhuiyan, S. A. et al. Harmonized cross-species cell atlases of trigeminal and dorsal root ganglia. Sci Adv 10 , eadj9173, doi:10.1126/sciadv.adj9173 (2024). Liu, Z., Wu, D., Zhai, W. & Ma, L. SONAR enables cell type deconvolution with spatially weighted Poisson-Gamma model for spatial transcriptomics. Nat Commun 14 , 4727, doi:10.1038/s41467-023-40458-9 (2023). Wangzhou, A. et al. A ligand-receptor interactome platform for discovery of pain mechanisms and therapeutic targets. Sci Signal 14 , doi:10.1126/scisignal.abe1648 (2021). Thomas, P. D. et al. PANTHER: Making genome-scale phylogenetics accessible to all. Protein Sci 31 , 8-22, doi:10.1002/pro.4218 (2022). Additional Declarations There is NO Competing Interest. Supplementary Files STable1.Donordemographics.xlsx Supplementary Table 1 STable2.SignificantGeneOntologyTermsforNageottenodules.xlsx Supplementary Table 2 STable3.NageottenoduleGeneList.xlsx Supplementary Table 3 STable4.DeconvolutionofmRNAsourcesinNageottenodules.xlsx Supplementary Table 4 STable6.Spatialsequencingmetrics.xlsx Supplementary Table 6 STable5.ProbeandAntibodyList.xlsx Supplementary Table 5 SupplementalMovie1.mp4 Supplemental Movie 1. Peripherin-positive axonal fibers sprout throughout the DRG forming Nageotte nodule axon bundles and pericellular nests. SupplementalMovie2.mp4 Supplemental Movie 2. Nageotte nodule axon bundles originate from dystrophic axons which sprout from local sensory neurons in situ. SupplementalMovie3.mp4 Supplemental Movie 3. Nageotte nodule axon bundles originate from dystrophic axons which sprout from local sensory neurons in vitro. SupplementalFigures.docx Cite Share Download PDF Status: Published Journal Publication published 05 May, 2025 Read the published version in Nature Communications → Version 1 posted You are reading this latest preprint version Research Square lets you share your work early, gain feedback from the community, and start making changes to your manuscript prior to peer review in a journal. As a division of Research Square Company, we’re committed to making research communication faster, fairer, and more useful. We do this by developing innovative software and high quality services for the global research community. Our growing team is made up of researchers and industry professionals working together to solve the most critical problems facing scientific publishing. Also discoverable on Platform About Our Team In Review Editorial Policies Advisory Board Help Center Resources Author Services Accessibility API Access RSS feed Manage Cookie Preferences © Research Square 2026 | ISSN 2693-5015 (online) Privacy Policy Terms of Service Do Not Sell My Personal Information {"props":{"pageProps":{"initialData":{"identity":"rs-5006011","acceptedTermsAndConditions":true,"allowDirectSubmit":false,"archivedVersions":[],"articleType":"Article","associatedPublications":[],"authors":[{"id":359297446,"identity":"fe08e34f-f066-4766-923e-4df969d99277","order_by":0,"name":"Theodore Price","email":"","orcid":"https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6971-6221","institution":"University of Texas at Dallas","correspondingAuthor":true,"prefix":"","firstName":"Theodore","middleName":"","lastName":"Price","suffix":""},{"id":359297447,"identity":"f030148f-f613-4e77-b510-4073ca31d780","order_by":1,"name":"Stephanie Shiers","email":"","orcid":"https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9646-1850","institution":"University of Texas at Dallas","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Stephanie","middleName":"","lastName":"Shiers","suffix":""},{"id":359297448,"identity":"01e62d0a-6f76-4096-a960-9e651c1c406f","order_by":2,"name":"Khadijah Mazhar","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"The University of Texas at Dallas","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Khadijah","middleName":"","lastName":"Mazhar","suffix":""},{"id":359297449,"identity":"1e777130-b389-4ef3-9f40-619c08e6ded1","order_by":3,"name":"Andi Wangzhou","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"UT-Dallas","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Andi","middleName":"","lastName":"Wangzhou","suffix":""},{"id":359297450,"identity":"bea5dba8-df1b-44c9-8b41-ce7e77ea10a6","order_by":4,"name":"Rainer Haberberger","email":"","orcid":"https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8043-3786","institution":"The University of Adelaide","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Rainer","middleName":"","lastName":"Haberberger","suffix":""},{"id":359297451,"identity":"1ec3ae86-6c9a-48d7-887f-e05043c47b06","order_by":5,"name":"Joseph Lesnak","email":"","orcid":"https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4098-9090","institution":"The University of Texas at Dallas","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Joseph","middleName":"","lastName":"Lesnak","suffix":""},{"id":359297452,"identity":"626f6430-d3a3-42b2-8adb-a7eca6241543","order_by":6,"name":"Ishwarya Sankaranarayanan","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"The University of Texas at Dallas","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Ishwarya","middleName":"","lastName":"Sankaranarayanan","suffix":""},{"id":359297453,"identity":"21a355b2-c376-4038-8763-1b25f8fa1b92","order_by":7,"name":"Diana Tavares-Ferreira","email":"","orcid":"https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0986-3630","institution":"University of Texas at Dallas","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Diana","middleName":"","lastName":"Tavares-Ferreira","suffix":""},{"id":359297454,"identity":"54683c94-8dc3-45de-b8d1-870feeb6e72f","order_by":8,"name":"Anna Cervantes","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"The Southwest Transplant Alliance","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Anna","middleName":"","lastName":"Cervantes","suffix":""},{"id":359297455,"identity":"b8e15af1-0204-457c-bcab-8396b9374670","order_by":9,"name":"Geoffrey Funk","email":"","orcid":"https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6875-6777","institution":"The Southwest Transplant Alliance","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Geoffrey","middleName":"","lastName":"Funk","suffix":""},{"id":359297456,"identity":"370c3584-f7ef-4d1b-8554-4d5b94f1058a","order_by":10,"name":"Peter Horton","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"The Southwest Transplant Alliance","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Peter","middleName":"","lastName":"Horton","suffix":""},{"id":359297457,"identity":"a1e1652b-ae20-4875-8268-988ca33ac776","order_by":11,"name":"Erin Vines","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"The Southwest Transplant Alliance","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Erin","middleName":"","lastName":"Vines","suffix":""},{"id":359297458,"identity":"8c3ab9fa-618a-40ba-a56a-1ab3e5fa9d50","order_by":12,"name":"Gregory Dussor","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"University of Texas at Dallas","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Gregory","middleName":"","lastName":"Dussor","suffix":""}],"badges":[],"createdAt":"2024-08-30 21:05:24","currentVersionCode":1,"declarations":"","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-5006011/v1","doiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-5006011/v1","draftVersion":[],"editorialEvents":[{"content":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-025-59538-z","type":"published","date":"2025-05-05T04:00:00+00:00"}],"editorialNote":"","failedWorkflow":false,"files":[{"id":65425029,"identity":"88db5adf-7845-458c-bf08-c65d478e660f","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2024-09-27 08:55:24","extension":"png","order_by":1,"title":"Figure 1","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":2209635,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eIdentification of Nageotte nodules in DRGs from diabetic organ donors. A)\u003c/strong\u003e Hematoxylin and eosin staining was performed on DRGs from organ donors and then each DRG was scored for prevalence of Nageotte nodules using a qualitative scoring system. \u003cstrong\u003eB) \u003c/strong\u003eAfter scoring, donors were grouped based on their medical history of diabetes, analgesic usage, or medical note of diabetic peripheral neuropathy. Diabetic donors had significantly higher Nageotte nodule scores compared to non-diabetic donors. In diabetics, Nageotte nodule content increased in severity in relation to painful diabetic neuropathy as indicated by analgesic usage, medical note of diabetic peripheral neuropathy, and/or diabetes-related amputation. \u003cstrong\u003eC)\u003c/strong\u003e Representative images of an L4 bi ganglia from a DPN donor immunostained for GFAP (red, satellite glial cells), peripherin (green, sensory neurons), and DAPI (blue, nuclei). Asterisks denote Nageotte nodules. \u003cstrong\u003eD) \u003c/strong\u003eThe percentage of Nageotte nodules was significantly higher in the DPN DRGs (average: 25%) compared to non-diabetic DRGs (average: 8%). \u003cstrong\u003eE)\u003c/strong\u003e Confocal image of a peripherin-positive axon bundle intertwined with other cells at a Nageotte nodules. \u003cstrong\u003eF) \u003c/strong\u003eImage taken from Jean Nageotte’s original 1922 publication \u003csup\u003e1\u003c/sup\u003e in which three Nageotte nodules (mid top, mid bottom, and left) contain axon bundles which sprout from a glomerulus (middle). \u003cstrong\u003eG) \u003c/strong\u003eTransmission electron microscopy (TEM) of a Nageotte nodule. Arrows point to unmyelinated axonal fibers. \u003cstrong\u003eStatistical tests:\u003c/strong\u003e B: One-way ANOVA with Bonferroni’s multiple comparisons test. D: Unpaired t-test. ****p\u0026lt;0.0001, ***p\u0026lt;0.001, **p\u0026lt;0.01, *p\u0026lt;0.05. \u003cstrong\u003eScale bars:\u003c/strong\u003e A: 100 μm. C: Mosaic – 1mm and other panels - 50 μm. E: 10 μm. G: 2 μm.\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"1.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-5006011/v1/c71886161eb75891277463b1.png"},{"id":65425035,"identity":"42dc9799-2ac8-459f-9ebf-042b5baf3942","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2024-09-27 08:55:24","extension":"png","order_by":2,"title":"Figure 2","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":1550738,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eNageotte nodule axons express nociceptive, but not sympathetic markers. A) \u003c/strong\u003eTyrosine hydroxylase (TH, red) labeling in combination with peripherin (green) and DAPI (blue) revealed that Nageotte nodule axonal sprouts were not sympathetic in origin. Sample size: DPN n=9. \u003cstrong\u003eB) \u003c/strong\u003eTrpV1 fibers at a Nageotte nodule in a DPN DRG (white arrow). TrpV1 was only detected in Nageotte nodules from a single DPN donor. The TrpV1+ fibers at the Nageotte nodule appeared to arise from a glomerulus (magenta arrow).\u003cstrong\u003e \u003c/strong\u003eSample size: DPN n=5. \u003cstrong\u003eC) \u003c/strong\u003eNav1.7 (red) was detected in the axonal fibers intertwined with Nageotte nodules. Sample size: DPN n=6. \u003cstrong\u003eScale\u003c/strong\u003e \u003cstrong\u003ebars:\u003c/strong\u003e A: 10 μm. B: 20 μm. C: 10 μm.\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"2.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-5006011/v1/2cd1d360d4d5c7c5ce1e180d.png"},{"id":65426107,"identity":"4c28040f-6787-4537-8f27-271fc408bf91","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2024-09-27 09:11:24","extension":"png","order_by":3,"title":"Figure 3","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":2240147,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eNageotte nodule axon bundles originate from axonal sprouts from local sensory neurons \u003c/strong\u003e\u003cem\u003e\u003cstrong\u003ein situ\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/em\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eand \u003c/strong\u003e\u003cem\u003e\u003cstrong\u003ein vitro\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/em\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e. A) \u003c/strong\u003eNageotte nodule (white asterisks), two sensory neuron cell bodies (yellow asterisks), and dystrophic axons (magenta arrows) in a 60X z-stack projection image of a DRG section stained for peripherin (green) and DAPI (blue) from donor 6. In the Trace panel, axonal filaments stemming from the neuronal soma of the middle sensory neuron were traced in Imaris (pink filament trace) which mainly connected to dystrophic axons (multi-colored axonal blebs). The Nageotte nodule axonal bundle (blue filament trace) were mainly spooling fibers that traced back to dystrophic axons. In some cases, dystrophic axons were interconnected to one another (yellow filament traces). \u003cstrong\u003eB) \u003c/strong\u003eA\u003cstrong\u003e \u003c/strong\u003erepresentative 20X z-stack projection image of human DRG sensory neurons that were cultured \u003cem\u003ein vitro\u003c/em\u003e for 3 days and then stained for peripherin (green), and DAPI (blue). Human sensory neurons display a multipolar phenotype in which multiple axonal branches sprout from the neuronal soma (yellow arrows), form dystrophic axons (magenta arrows), and intertwine with structures resembling Nageotte nodules (white arrows). A digitally zoomed-in view of the outlined area (cyan) exemplifies a multipolar sensory neuron sprouting fibers into a Nageotte nodule. \u003cstrong\u003eC)\u003c/strong\u003e Jean Nageotte described collateral sprouting in 1922 (I-III; original illustration by Jean Nageotte, 1922) in which I) a normal ganglion cell with a T-bifurcated axon is II) deprived of the radicular branch of the axon resulting in III) neurite outgrowth from the soma and glomerulus which are equipped with encapsulated growth balls. Jean Nageotte as well as our imaging of DPN DRGs noted IV) the formation of non-sympathetic pericellular nests that formed around sensory neurons with intact somata and those with shrunken/misshapen somata likely in the process of dying. V) Neurites sprout from the dystrophic axons forming arborizations at Nageotte nodules. \u003cstrong\u003eScale bars:\u003c/strong\u003e A: 15 μm. B: 50 μm and zoomed-in view panel: 10 μm.\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"3.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-5006011/v1/2a1235267d9babb7bb8c1fad.png"},{"id":65425197,"identity":"54153587-596f-4f10-a7f2-50f4c872ac7e","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2024-09-27 09:03:24","extension":"png","order_by":4,"title":"Figure 4","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":1350664,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eSpatial transcriptomics of Nageotte nodules identifies non-myelinating Schwann cells and satellite glia as prominent cell types. A) \u003c/strong\u003eSpatial transcriptomics was conducted on DRGs from 6 DPN donors. Barcodes touching Nageotte nodules (1094) and nearby neurons (1087) were selected for downstream analysis. \u003cstrong\u003eB)\u003c/strong\u003e Key gene ontology themes were related to neurodegeneration. \u003cstrong\u003eC)\u003c/strong\u003e RNAscope \u003cem\u003ein situ\u003c/em\u003e hybridization for \u003cem\u003eSOX10\u003c/em\u003e (green, satellite glia and Schwann cells), \u003cem\u003eFABP7\u003c/em\u003e (red, satellite glia), \u003cem\u003eCD68\u003c/em\u003e (purple, macrophages) and DAPI (blue) in a DPN DRG. Confocal, 40X. Sample size: DPN n=6. \u003cstrong\u003eD)\u003c/strong\u003eDigitally zoomed overlay images of Nageotte nodule 1 (cyan arrow in panel C), and Nageotte nodule 2 (yellow arrow in panel C). Nageotte nodule 1 had higher content of \u003cem\u003eFABP7\u003c/em\u003e+ nuclei, while Nageotte nodule 2 had little-to-no \u003cem\u003eFABP7\u003c/em\u003esignal, indicating that there are differences in the composition of cell types between Nageotte nodules. \u003cstrong\u003eE)\u003c/strong\u003e Deconvolution using single-nuclear sequencing datasets revealed that the sources of the majority of mRNA transcripts in Nageotte nodules come from Satellite glial cells and non-myelinating (NM) Schwann cells. The remaining percentage of transcripts in Nageotte nodules arise from neurons, likely axonally trafficked mRNAs. \u003cstrong\u003eF) \u003c/strong\u003eClustering analysis of Nageotte nodule barcodes identified 5 subclusters. \u003cstrong\u003eG)\u003c/strong\u003eDeconvolution reveals differences in the distribution of mRNA sources between clusters.\u003cstrong\u003e Scale bars:\u003c/strong\u003e C: 50 μm. D: 10 μm.\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"4.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-5006011/v1/2f8982921d0fc080e5800a54.png"},{"id":65425040,"identity":"f99adfaa-ce36-420f-80ae-f4c382c260c4","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2024-09-27 08:55:24","extension":"png","order_by":5,"title":"Figure 5","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":1452078,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eLigand-receptor interactions between Nageotte nodules and nearby neurons identifies osteopontin (SPP1) and CD44. A) \u003c/strong\u003eDifferentially expressed ligands per Nageotte nodule cluster and corresponding receptors expressed in nearby neurons. \u003cstrong\u003eB)\u003c/strong\u003eRNAscope \u003cem\u003ein situ\u003c/em\u003e hybridization for \u003cem\u003eSCN10A \u003c/em\u003e(green, Nav1.8), \u003cem\u003eSPP1\u003c/em\u003e(red, osteopontin), \u003cem\u003eCD44\u003c/em\u003e (blue), and DAPI (cyan) in a DPN DRG. White outline denotes the digitally zoomed-in image of a single Nageotte nodule shown in the bottom panel. Confocal, 40X. Sample size: DPN n=5. \u003cstrong\u003eC)\u003c/strong\u003e Top 20 expressed cytokines in Nageotte nodules\u003cem\u003e. \u003c/em\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eD)\u003c/strong\u003e Immunohistochemistry for phosphorylated eukaryotic translation initiation factor (red, p-eIF4E) and DAPI (blue) in a non-diabetic and DPN DRG. \u003cstrong\u003eE)\u003c/strong\u003e p-eIF4E was significantly elevated in the soma of sensory neurons in the DPN DRGs. Sample size: Non-diabetic n=5, DPN n=5. \u003cstrong\u003eF)\u003c/strong\u003e p-eIF4E was also detected at Nageotte nodules in the DPN DRGs. \u003cstrong\u003eStatistical tests:\u003c/strong\u003e E: Unpaired t-test. ***p\u0026lt;0.001. \u003cstrong\u003eScale bars:\u003c/strong\u003e B: top panel - 50 μm and bottom panel - 10 μm. D: 200 μm. F: 50 μm.\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"5.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-5006011/v1/20d45df9ff6e55cad43dcad1.png"},{"id":82028807,"identity":"81ef2827-42f9-46fc-8292-6c54cdcfcea3","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-05-06 07:06:33","extension":"pdf","order_by":0,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"manuscript-pdf","size":12211496,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"manuscript.pdf","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-5006011/v1/9c2f7437-5897-4104-ad97-35d8ff78523d.pdf"},{"id":65425043,"identity":"5b4971c0-adc7-48fb-90a0-f87773cde9b5","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2024-09-27 08:55:25","extension":"xlsx","order_by":1,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"supplement","size":29967,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"Supplementary Table 1","description":"","filename":"STable1.Donordemographics.xlsx","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-5006011/v1/e9412a6d749dfbf7a9e77b3b.xlsx"},{"id":65426108,"identity":"ba6b39d6-aa82-4f87-91e0-e8a8e8083290","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2024-09-27 09:11:24","extension":"xlsx","order_by":2,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"supplement","size":100766,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"Supplementary Table 2","description":"","filename":"STable2.SignificantGeneOntologyTermsforNageottenodules.xlsx","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-5006011/v1/1dfb737083dcc80f07e2aa8e.xlsx"},{"id":65425037,"identity":"d58d7bc8-0af3-4ef5-928e-8d9211d0d018","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2024-09-27 08:55:24","extension":"xlsx","order_by":3,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"supplement","size":4903346,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"Supplementary Table 3","description":"","filename":"STable3.NageottenoduleGeneList.xlsx","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-5006011/v1/e942d4f77fe292111a559c3f.xlsx"},{"id":65425199,"identity":"40c8d23c-0efb-4b59-92cc-91100b150c99","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2024-09-27 09:03:24","extension":"xlsx","order_by":4,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"supplement","size":7458444,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"Supplementary Table 4","description":"","filename":"STable4.DeconvolutionofmRNAsourcesinNageottenodules.xlsx","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-5006011/v1/b6f5749f42e0bdfdf31149ff.xlsx"},{"id":65425032,"identity":"54b7ccb2-9b73-4f38-88bb-644aab6a8577","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2024-09-27 08:55:24","extension":"xlsx","order_by":5,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"supplement","size":12692,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"Supplementary Table 6","description":"","filename":"STable6.Spatialsequencingmetrics.xlsx","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-5006011/v1/dcd17319c6f101a725363892.xlsx"},{"id":65425030,"identity":"59b88ce6-9526-4ce1-9055-c1b90160f47e","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2024-09-27 08:55:24","extension":"xlsx","order_by":6,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"supplement","size":12685,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"Supplementary Table 5","description":"","filename":"STable5.ProbeandAntibodyList.xlsx","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-5006011/v1/5fbc81d61ddb23044aeaeeef.xlsx"},{"id":65425201,"identity":"db79adbc-f5fe-4091-9368-b8815dcf3c93","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2024-09-27 09:03:24","extension":"mp4","order_by":7,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"supplement","size":4435832,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"Supplemental Movie 1. Peripherin-positive axonal fibers sprout throughout the DRG forming Nageotte nodule axon bundles and pericellular nests.","description":"","filename":"SupplementalMovie1.mp4","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-5006011/v1/b15b666ad6c52df214f5217e.mp4"},{"id":65426109,"identity":"365c5a77-c514-4c38-a889-7c97252cf4c2","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2024-09-27 09:11:24","extension":"mp4","order_by":8,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"supplement","size":1512127,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"Supplemental Movie 2. Nageotte nodule axon bundles originate from dystrophic axons which sprout from local sensory neurons in situ.","description":"","filename":"SupplementalMovie2.mp4","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-5006011/v1/d27636888cf0859b65ccee4d.mp4"},{"id":65425041,"identity":"7b1fc722-c002-4c01-addf-5521a7b69958","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2024-09-27 08:55:24","extension":"mp4","order_by":9,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"supplement","size":3959284,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"Supplemental Movie 3. Nageotte nodule axon bundles originate from dystrophic axons which sprout from local sensory neurons in vitro.","description":"","filename":"SupplementalMovie3.mp4","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-5006011/v1/01027f0998970d3d56b76529.mp4"},{"id":65425042,"identity":"a28cd318-3e03-4433-962d-c84dfaa2b2e4","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2024-09-27 08:55:24","extension":"docx","order_by":10,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"supplement","size":12328717,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"SupplementalFigures.docx","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-5006011/v1/620c1cd4195827c7fbb5dc33.docx"}],"financialInterests":"There is \u003cb\u003eNO\u003c/b\u003e Competing Interest.","formattedTitle":"Nageotte nodules in human DRG reveal neurodegeneration in painful diabetic neuropathy","fulltext":[{"header":"Introduction","content":"\u003cp\u003eJean Nageotte, a French neuroanatomist, first described residual nodules, now known as Nageotte nodules, in 1922 after conducting nerve-graft experiments in rabbits. He described these structures as clusters of satellite glia that fill the space of decomposed sensory neurons: “As the nerve cell corpse is reabsorbed, the satellite cells proliferate, and when the nerve cell has disappeared, they form a nodule\u0026nbsp;\u003csup\u003e1\u003c/sup\u003e.”\u0026nbsp;Since his discovery, \u0026nbsp;Nageotte nodules have been infrequently described in the literature with the majority of papers reporting their presence in ganglia from macaques (4 publications;\u0026nbsp;\u003csup\u003e2-5\u003c/sup\u003e), humans (21 publications;\u0026nbsp;\u003csup\u003e6-26\u003c/sup\u003e), and rats (2 publications\u0026nbsp;\u003csup\u003e27,28\u003c/sup\u003e), associated with various neurodegenerative conditions and rare diseases. Human data on Nageotte nodules are limited to neuropathological findings in sensory ganglia with long post-mortem intervals (PMIs) and are, in most cases, from single case studies. As such, little is known about the molecular identity of these structures, nor their involvement in the context of pain and neurodegeneration. The identity and potential clinical importance of these pathological structures appears to be a story that has been lost to time.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eDiabetic painful neuropathy (DPN) is the most common form of neuropathic pain. Patients often report spontaneous shooting or stabbing pain accompanied by sensory deficits, which is usually attributed to die-back of sensory axons from the epidermis\u0026nbsp;\u003csup\u003e29\u003c/sup\u003e. Sural nerve biopsies show that this axonal loss in DPN can be extensive. The stabbing and shooting pain in DPN is attributed to spontaneous action potentials generated in DRG nociceptors because microneurography studies in patients show that pain is correlated with activity in these axons\u0026nbsp;\u003csup\u003e30-33\u003c/sup\u003e. While advances in understanding the underlying mechanisms of DPN have been made\u0026nbsp;\u003csup\u003e29\u003c/sup\u003e, there are no mechanism-based treatments for the disease and there is no unifying theories of pathology that directly connect the mix of loss of function (sensory and proprioceptive loss) and gain of function (spontaneous pain) that are so common in this disease. \u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eTo investigate the molecular identity of Nageotte nodules and to address their role in human disease, we recovered dorsal root ganglia (DRGs) from a large sample of organ donors (90 donors) with short PMIs (average: 2 hours) and with detailed medical histories (\u003cstrong\u003eSupplementary Table 1\u003c/strong\u003e). Tissue quality was assessed using established protocols\u0026nbsp;\u003csup\u003e34\u003c/sup\u003e. We first conducted Hematoxylin and Eosin staining on all DRGs (90 donors) and observed Nageotte nodules in DRGs from diabetics that increased in relation to DPN (analgesic usage, diagnosis of diabetic peripheral neuropathy, and/or diabetes-related amputation) (\u003cstrong\u003eFig 1A-B\u003c/strong\u003e). A small subset of non-diabetic donors with other pain conditions such as fibromyalgia or idiopathic peripheral neuropathy also showed high numbers of Nageotte nodules within DRGs (\u003cstrong\u003eSupplemental Fig 1A-B)\u003c/strong\u003e. This appeared to be specific for pain disorders with a neuropathic component because Nageotte nodules were not routinely noted in DRGs obtained from donors with arthritis. However, the affected arthritic joints were not noted in the medical history, thereby, the DRGs associated to arthritic pain dermatomes may not have been investigated. Lumbar (L5) and sacral (S1) DRGs recovered from a diabetic donor with below-the-knee amputation of the right leg revealed Nageotte nodules in DRGs from both sides of the body (\u003cstrong\u003eSupplemental Fig 1C\u003c/strong\u003e), supporting that Nageotte nodule formation is not unilateral, nor a result of amputation. In a subset of DPN donors, we were also able to procure DRGs from the upper thoracic area (T4). We observed comparable Nageotte nodule content between lumbar and thoracic 4 DRGs in the DPN donors (\u003cstrong\u003eSupplemental Fig 1D\u003c/strong\u003e), indicating that Nageotte nodule formation also likely occurs across DRG levels/dermatomes.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp;Jean Nageotte reported that the cells comprising Nageotte nodules are satellite glial cells (SGCs)\u0026nbsp;\u003csup\u003e1\u003c/sup\u003e. In order to quantify the percentage of Nageotte nodules in relation to the total neuronal population, we conducted immunohistochemistry for glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP), a marker of SGCs and non-myelinating Schwann cells\u0026nbsp;\u003csup\u003e35\u003c/sup\u003e, and peripherin, a sensory neuron marker, in non-diabetic and DPN DRGs. As expected, we observed robust GFAP signal localized to the cells forming Nageotte nodules. When quantified, we found that 25% of the neurons had a Nageotte nodule morphology in the DPN DRGs, suggesting that a quarter of all sensory neurons are dead in these individuals (\u003cstrong\u003eFig 1C-D\u003c/strong\u003e). Peripherin staining revealed a neuroma-like axonal structure intertwined with the cells forming Nageotte nodules (\u003cstrong\u003eFig 1E\u003c/strong\u003e) similar to descriptions by Nageotte in rabbit DRG in 1922\u0026nbsp;\u003csup\u003e1\u003c/sup\u003e (\u003cstrong\u003eFig 1F\u003c/strong\u003e). Nageotte posited that these “arborizations of residual nodules” were axonal sprouts from the hypertrophied glomeruli of surviving neurons: “extremely rich bouquets of fibers, which arise from the glomeruli of surviving nerve cells, and which will flourish in the neighboring residual nodules, formed by the satellite elements of dead nerve cells”\u0026nbsp;\u003csup\u003e1\u003c/sup\u003e (\u003cstrong\u003eFig 1F\u003c/strong\u003e). Transmission electron microscopy supported the existence of thin, unmyelinated fibers intertwined with the cells at Nageotte nodules (\u003cstrong\u003eFig 1G, Supplemental Fig 2A-D\u003c/strong\u003e).\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eInterestingly, there was also a significant increase in peripherin-positive axonal sprouting that spanned the entirety of the DPN DRGs compared to non-diabetic controls (\u003cstrong\u003eSupplemental Fig 3A-B\u003c/strong\u003e). These axonal sprouts not only intertwined with the cells forming Nageotte nodules, but also surrounded sensory neurons with visible cell bodies (\u003cstrong\u003eSupplemental Fig 3C, Supplemental Movie 1\u003c/strong\u003e). In rodents and humans with neuropathic pain, tyrosine hydroxylase (TH)-expressing sympathetic axons are known to encircle sensory neurons, forming basket-like structures called pericellular nests (PCNs)\u0026nbsp;\u003csup\u003e36-38\u003c/sup\u003e. Nageotte nodules are anatomically distinguishable from PCNs because they do not have a neuronal soma and are conglomerates of non-neuronal cells. However, we also observed numerous PCNs in the DPN DRGs (\u003cstrong\u003eSupplemental Fig 3C\u003c/strong\u003e). Jean Nageotte surmised that the axons comprising Nageotte nodules and PCNs were not sympathetic in origin as they formed within 24 hours in his ganglia preparations, were highly numerous, and sprouted from sensory neurons\u0026nbsp;\u003csup\u003e1\u003c/sup\u003e (\u003cstrong\u003eSupplemental Fig 3D)\u003c/strong\u003e. He also postulated that the PCNs and Nageotte nodule arborizations were the same structures at difference stages of neuron decay/death (\u003cstrong\u003eSupplemental Fig 3D-E\u003c/strong\u003e): “These arborizations of residual nodules and Dogiel’s pericellular platoons are one and the same thing. I was able to convince myself that, at the beginning, all the arborizations of the residual nodules begin as pericellular platoons developed around dying or dead nerve cells\u0026nbsp;\u003csup\u003e1\u003c/sup\u003e.”\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eTo assess possible sympathetic sprouting in DPN DRGs, we labeled sympathetic fibers using tyrosine hydroxylase (TH) which robustly stained sympathetic neurons and fibers in the human sympathetic chain ganglia (\u003cstrong\u003eSupplemental Fig 4A\u003c/strong\u003e) and sparse fibers within the nerve attached to the DRG (\u003cstrong\u003eSupplemental Fig 4B\u003c/strong\u003e) but showed little-to-no axonal labeling within the DRG (\u003cstrong\u003eSupplemental Fig 4C\u003c/strong\u003e). We found no evidence for TH-positive axons at Nageotte nodules \u003cstrong\u003e(Fig 2A),\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003enor at PCNs, indicating that these arborizations are not sympathetic. It is important to note that the high population of non-sympathetic PCNs in the DPN DRGs is largely contrasting to the prevalence of sympathetic PCNs noted in rodents and humans with other types of neuropathic pain\u0026nbsp;\u003csup\u003e36-38\u003c/sup\u003e. For example, only 2 sympathetic PCNs were found in a DRG from a human with herniated intervertebral disc and severe sciatica pain\u0026nbsp;\u003csup\u003e38\u003c/sup\u003e. The differences in prevalence and in the expression of TH of these morphologically similar structures indicate that these are likely two distinct pathologies.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eWe next sought to identify the nature of these sprouting axons into Nageotte nodules, hypothesizing that they could be nociceptive fibers. To test this hypothesis, we conducted immunohistochemistry for the capsaicin-receptor, TrpV1, which is expressed at the mRNA and protein level in all human nociceptors\u0026nbsp;\u003csup\u003e39-41\u003c/sup\u003e. However, the majority of the DPN samples, particularly the DRGs obtained from donors who had established diagnoses of diabetic peripheral neuropathy or diabetes-related amputation, showed a drastic decrease in TrpV1 protein expression throughout the DRG (\u003cstrong\u003eSupplemental Fig 5A-B)\u003c/strong\u003e. These data corroborated published mRNA sequencing data in which TrpV1 mRNA is significantly decreased in human DPN DRGs\u0026nbsp;\u003csup\u003e42\u003c/sup\u003e. However, one DPN DRG from an organ donor who was diabetic, taking analgesics, and had difficulty walking (donor 12) showed elevated TrpV1 expression within the DRG (\u003cstrong\u003eSupplemental Fig 5A-B\u003c/strong\u003e). In this donor, TrpV1 was detected in axons at Nageotte nodules (\u003cstrong\u003eFig 2B\u003c/strong\u003e), and in dystrophic axons \u003cstrong\u003e(Supplemental Fig 5C)\u003c/strong\u003e.TrpV1-positive axonal fibers at Nageotte nodules arose from a thickened portion of a TrpV1-positive axon, potentially a glomerulus given its close proximity to two TrpV1-positive sensory neurons (\u003cstrong\u003eFig 2B\u003c/strong\u003e). \u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eWe then assessed Nav1.7 expression in axonal arborizations at Nageotte nodules. In humans, the voltage gated sodium channel (VGSC) Nav1.7 is known to be expressed in sensory neurons, including all human nociceptors\u0026nbsp;\u003csup\u003e39,40\u003c/sup\u003e, and in painful neuromas (\u003cem\u003e41-43\u003c/em\u003e) which are suspected to give rise to ectopic activity as has been evidenced by the efficacy of VGSC blockers in experimental (\u003cem\u003e44-47\u003c/em\u003e) and human neuromas (\u003cem\u003e48\u003c/em\u003e). Similar to neuromas, Nageotte nodules express regenerative axon markers like GAP-43 (\u003cem\u003e26\u003c/em\u003e) and morphologically appear similar given the abundance of abnormal axonal sprouting. Nav1.7 was expressed by the axonal arborizations at Nageotte nodules (\u003cstrong\u003eFig 2C, Supplemental Fig 6\u003c/strong\u003e), in axonal fibers throughout the DRG including PCNs, and within the membrane of dystrophic axons which were frequently observed in the DPN DRGs (\u003cstrong\u003eSupplemental Fig 7A-B)\u003c/strong\u003e. Neuroaxonal dystrophy is a known pathology in humans with diabetes\u0026nbsp;\u003csup\u003e26,43\u003c/sup\u003e, and is marked by the formation of dystrophic axons that are believed to form as a result of “frustrated axonal regeneration” in which the axon terminals of regenerating sensory fibers swell, and contain large numbers of neurofilaments, vesicles, and neuropeptides like CGRP\u0026nbsp;\u003csup\u003e26\u003c/sup\u003e. Jean Nageotte reported similar structures in decaying spinal ganglia which he called “adventitious buds” or “growth balls.” He claimed these structures sprouted from the sensory neuron soma, glomerulus, and the extracapsular portion of the axon in a process that he called collateral regeneration (\u003cstrong\u003eSupplemental Fig 7B-C).\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eJean Nageotte’s theory of collateral regeneration contrasts with the classically defined pseudounipolar shape of sensory neurons as it suggests that sensory neurons can take on a multipolar phenotype in degenerating DPN DRGs. We describe two lines of evidence supporting the hypothesis that DRG neurons take on a multipolar phenotype when they sprout into Nageotte nodules. First, we conducted filament tracing of peripherin-positive axonal fibers within DRG tissue sections to identify the origin of Nageotte nodules axon bundles. In many cases, Nageotte nodule axon bundles originated from discontinuous collaterals from outside the field of view; however, we were able to confidently trace the fibers in two Nageotte nodules which were connected to neurites and local dystrophic axons that budded from local sensory neurons (\u003cstrong\u003eFig 3A, Supplemental Movie 2\u003c/strong\u003e). We also traced many thin fibers that appeared to stem from the neuronal soma (\u003cstrong\u003eFig 3B\u003c/strong\u003e), forming a PCN around the same neuron and supporting not only a multipolar phenotype, but also lending credence to Jean Nageotte’s claim that non-sympathetic PCNs arise from sensory neurons. Second, dissociated sensory neurons from human DRGs take on a multipolar morphology \u003cem\u003ein vitro\u003c/em\u003e and display dystrophic axonal budding from the neuronal soma and elongated axonal branches that intertwine with \u003cem\u003ein vitro\u003c/em\u003e structures that resemble Nageotte nodules (\u003cstrong\u003eFig 3B, Supplemental Movie 3\u003c/strong\u003e). Together, these findings support Jean Nageotte’s original ideas on PCNs and Nageotte nodules and offer an updated view on Jean Nageotte’s theory of collateral regeneration (\u003cstrong\u003eFig 3C\u003c/strong\u003e).\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eTo elucidate the molecular profile of Nageotte nodules, we conducted spatial transcriptomics of DPN DRGs and selected barcodes overlapping Nageotte nodules and adjacent neurons (\u003cstrong\u003eFig 4A\u003c/strong\u003e). We identified 1094 barcodes that were overlapping single Nageotte nodules, and 1087 that were touching nearby neurons (\u003cstrong\u003eFig 4A\u003c/strong\u003e). Gene ontology of Nageotte nodules identified many terms related to sensory neuron degeneration (\u003cstrong\u003eFig 4B\u003c/strong\u003e) as well as other terms associated with cellular components, biological processes, and molecular functions associated with axonal sprouting and sensory neuron pathology (\u003cstrong\u003eSupplemental Table 2\u003c/strong\u003e). A full list of mRNAs detected at Nageotte nodules can be found in \u003cstrong\u003eSupplemental Table 3\u003c/strong\u003e. While Jean Nageotte wrote that Nageotte nodules were formed by SGCs\u0026nbsp;\u003csup\u003e1\u003c/sup\u003e, there has been no molecular characterization of these structures to confirm their cellular composition. Using cell-type marker genes identified in the spatial sequencing data, we conducted histology to validate localization of specific cell types to Nageotte nodules. Schwann cell and SGC markers like S100 and SOX10 were both detected at Nageotte nodules (\u003cstrong\u003eSupplemental Fig 8A\u003c/strong\u003e), while the blood vessel marker, CD31, was not (\u003cstrong\u003eSupplemental Fig 8B\u003c/strong\u003e).\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eIn conducting these experiments, we noted that Nageotte nodules could be separated into different populations based on their expression of the SGC-specific marker, FABP7, and the SGC and Schwann cell marker, SOX10 (\u003cstrong\u003eFig 4C-D\u003c/strong\u003e). SOX10 is a transcription factor required for the differentiation of pluripotent neural crest cells into SGCs and Schwann cells\u0026nbsp;\u003csup\u003e44,45\u003c/sup\u003e, thereby, cells that are SOX10-positive, but FABP7-negative are Schwann cells, while cells expressing both are SGCs. While virtually all of the cells at Nageotte nodules were SOX10-positive, FABP7 was only detected in a subset of them (\u003cstrong\u003eFig 4C-D\u003c/strong\u003e). CD68, a macrophage marker, was also detected in a small number of peripheral cells at Nageotte nodules (\u003cstrong\u003eFig 4C-D\u003c/strong\u003e); however, CD68 along with other antigen-presenting cell markers have been reported to be expressed in SGCs in the human trigeminal ganglia\u0026nbsp;\u003csup\u003e46\u003c/sup\u003e. Deconvolution of the Nageotte nodule barcodes using single-nuclei RNA sequencing data of human DRG cell types revealed that the highest percentage of non-neuronal mRNA transcripts at Nageotte nodules belonged to SGCs and non-myelinating Schwann cells, followed by fibroblasts, macrophages, endothelial cells, T-cells and other cell types (\u003cstrong\u003eFig 4E, Supplemental Table 4\u003c/strong\u003e).\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp;Because our histology findings suggested that Nageotte nodules have different cellular compositions, we examined whether we could identify unique clusters of Nageotte nodule types from spatial barcodes. We identified 5 different subclusters of Nageotte nodules (\u003cstrong\u003eFig 4F\u003c/strong\u003e) that were represented across all donors, indicating that these subclusters are not a product of individual differences (\u003cstrong\u003eSupplemental Fig 9A\u003c/strong\u003e). Deconvolution analysis revealed small differences in the composition of cell types within each cluster (\u003cstrong\u003eFig 4G\u003c/strong\u003e). The most abundant of these was neuronal in each cluster. Given that there is no neuronal soma at Nageotte nodules, the neuronal signature is likely related to axonally trafficked mRNAs from nearby neurons. Some of the most highly expressed genes at Nageotte nodules were peripherin, neurofilaments, tubulins, and other cytoskeletal mRNAs that are \u0026nbsp;translated locally to support axonal growth (\u003cstrong\u003eSupplemental Table 3\u003c/strong\u003e). The clustering approach reveals only subtle shifts in cell proportions but is consistent with histochemical observations and reveals differences in gene expression that may be important for interactions between cells in nodules and nearby neurons that sprout into the neurodegenerative area of the Nageotte nodule. These differences may also underlie different stages of\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eNageotte nodule formation that cannot be discerned in post-mortem samples. Consistent with the neurodegeneration phenotype we observed for DPN DRGs, we also observed a transcriptomic signal for disease\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eassociated glia\u0026nbsp;\u003csup\u003e41\u003c/sup\u003e characterized by high expression of \u003cem\u003eSPP1\u003c/em\u003e, \u003cem\u003eAPOE\u003c/em\u003e, \u003cem\u003eTYROBP\u003c/em\u003e, \u003cem\u003eCTSL\u003c/em\u003e in Nageotte nodules (\u003cstrong\u003eSupplemental Table 3\u003c/strong\u003e).\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp;Next, we utilized the spatial transcriptomic profiles of Nageotte nodules and local surviving neurons to investigate potential ligand-receptor interactions that could be ongoing between the cells forming Nageotte nodules and neighboring neurons. We did this analysis for each of the 5 clusters since they had differences in gene expression that could influence ligand-receptor interactions. The spatial barcodes are similar in size to sensory neurons (55 μm) and we have previously been able to achieve near-single neuron transcriptomic resolution with this approach\u0026nbsp;\u003csup\u003e41\u003c/sup\u003e; however, a limitation of the technology is that the neuronal barcodes do overlap with SGCs and other cells that ring the neurons. Thereby, some of the interactions may be representative of Nageotte ligands with receptors found on neurons and/or encircling SGCs/other cells. However, an interactome analysis can provide mechanistic insights into cellular interactions that could drive nociceptor activation, sprouting, or other cellular processes in diabetes, leading to the identification of new drug targets. First, we looked at differentially expressed ligand genes found in each cluster and examined interactions with receptors in nearby neuronal clusters. This revealed differences such as very high expression of \u003cem\u003eSPP1\u003c/em\u003e in cluster 1, high expression of \u003cem\u003eCLU\u003c/em\u003e in cluster 3, and a large number of neuropeptides like \u003cem\u003eCALCA\u003c/em\u003e, \u003cem\u003eGAL\u003c/em\u003e, \u003cem\u003ePENK\u003c/em\u003e and \u003cem\u003eADCYAP1\u0026nbsp;\u003c/em\u003ealso in cluster 3. A potential explanation for this finding in cluster 3 is that it is enriched in actively sprouting nociceptor axons that harbor mRNAs that might be locally translated (\u003cstrong\u003eFig 5A\u003c/strong\u003e).\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eNext, we assessed interactions for each cluster looking at differentially expressed receptors within nodules compared to nearby neuronal ligands. Here we found an enrichment of integrin receptor signaling in cluster 1, and again observed a strong neuronal signature in cluster 3 with NTRK1-NGF signaling (\u003cstrong\u003eSupplemental Figure 10\u003c/strong\u003e). Examining the most highly expressed ligands in Nageotte nodules paired with the most highly expressed receptors found in nearby neurons and then focusing on the top 50 interactions, we found striking similarities across the clusters suggesting that there are consistencies between them all among the most highly expressed genes (\u003cstrong\u003eSupplemental Fig \u0026nbsp;11\u003c/strong\u003e). \u0026nbsp; These included many interactions involved in neurite outgrowth or chemotaxis, such as \u003cem\u003eCLU\u0026nbsp;\u003c/em\u003e\u003cem\u003e\u003csup\u003e47\u003c/sup\u003e\u003c/em\u003e,\u003cem\u003e\u0026nbsp;SPP1\u0026nbsp;\u003c/em\u003e\u003cem\u003e\u003csup\u003e47\u003c/sup\u003e\u003c/em\u003e, \u003cem\u003eCLSTN1\u0026nbsp;\u003c/em\u003e\u003csup\u003e48\u003c/sup\u003e, which were found in all the clusters, and \u003cem\u003eNEGR1,\u0026nbsp;\u003c/em\u003ewhich was found in clusters 2 and 4\u0026nbsp;\u003csup\u003e49,50\u003c/sup\u003e (\u003cstrong\u003eSupplemental Fig \u0026nbsp;11\u003c/strong\u003e).\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eSPP1\u003c/em\u003e, the gene encoding osteopontin, was recently identified by phospho-proteomics as highly phosphorylated at multiple sites within human DPN DRGs and proposed to be involved in ER stress and extracellular matrix remodeling in DPN neurons\u0026nbsp;\u003csup\u003e51\u003c/sup\u003e. Osteopontin mRNA is robustly expressed in large diameter sensory neurons, SGCs, and Schwann cells in the normal, nondiabetic human DRG (\u003cstrong\u003eSupplemental Fig 12\u003c/strong\u003e) and binds to many integrins and to CD44 to elicit different cellular functions such as cell migration, cell proliferation, cytokine production, and neurite outgrowth\u0026nbsp;\u003csup\u003e52-56\u003c/sup\u003e. Our interactome data highlighted that osteopontin at Nageotte nodules may be interacting with CD44 found on nearby neurons (\u003cstrong\u003eFig 5A, Supplemental Figure 11\u003c/strong\u003e). We confirmed high levels of \u003cem\u003eSPP1\u003c/em\u003e expression in nodules with \u003cem\u003ein situ\u003c/em\u003e hybridization (\u003cstrong\u003eFig 5B\u003c/strong\u003e), \u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eCD44\u0026nbsp;\u003c/em\u003ewas highly expressed in most human sensory neurons (~85%) and was also found on SGCs and Schwann cells (\u003cstrong\u003eSupplemental Fig 10\u003c/strong\u003e), including those forming Nageotte nodules (\u003cstrong\u003eFig 5B\u003c/strong\u003e).\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eWhile there were many cytokines expressed in Nageotte nodules, \u003cem\u003eSPP1\u003c/em\u003e expression was robustly detected across clusters and was the most highly expressed of this gene family in nodules (\u003cstrong\u003eFig 5C\u003c/strong\u003e). A recent\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003estudy reported that SPP1 mRNA translation is dependent upon the phosphorylation of eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4E (eiF4E)\u0026nbsp;\u003csup\u003e57\u003c/sup\u003e. Inhibition of mitogen activated protein kinase interacting kinase (MNK), the kinase that specifically phosphorylates eIF4E, suppresses ectopic activity in human sensory neurons recovered from individuals with radicular neuropathic pain\u0026nbsp;\u003csup\u003e58\u003c/sup\u003e, and attenuates nociceptive behaviors in rodents with neuropathic pain\u0026nbsp;\u003csup\u003e59-61\u003c/sup\u003e. We examined eIF4E phosphorylation in DPN DRGs and observed significantly increased eIF4E phosphorylation in DPN sensory neurons compared to non-diabetic controls (\u003cstrong\u003eFig 5D-E\u003c/strong\u003e). Phosphorylated eIF4E was also detected in Nageotte nodules (\u003cstrong\u003eFig 5F\u003c/strong\u003e). These findings suggest that signaling from Nageotte nodules to DRG neurons may influence the excitability state of these neurons, a common feature of neuropathic pain. Increased eIF4E signaling may also support increased osteopontin expression in DPN DRGs.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eOur findings give a new perspective on the mechanisms of DPN. We find extensive neuronal degeneration in the DRGs of organ donors with DPN with as many as 25% of neurons lost in people with DPN taking analgesics that are used to treat neuropathic pain. This neurodegeneration is directly linked to the formation of Nageotte nodules that are enriched in cells with gene expression patterns that likely drive axonal sprouting and other pathological changes in DRG neurons like hyperexcitability that causes pain in DPN. The current view is that axonal dieback that is associated with pain and sensory loss in DPN can be treated with therapies that protect axonal integrity. Our findings show that neurodegeneration is extensive in DPN, and early neuroprotective strategies are almost certainly needed to protect patients from irreversible damage to DRG neurons. Our work updates the pioneering work of Jean Nageotte, showing that the structures he described in the 1920s are a key pathology in the DRG in DPN. Applying the power of modern microscopy and RNA-sequencing technologies to Nageotte’s nodules gives insight into the richness of the underlying biology of these small, yet extraordinarily complex structures. We propose that the work of Jean Nageotte over 100 years ago may be key to understanding and treating the most common form of neuropathic pain on Earth, DPN. \u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"Materials and Methods","content":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eTissue Procurement\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAll human tissue procurement procedures were approved by the Institutional Review Boards at the University of Texas at Dallas. Human DRGs were procured from organ donors through a collaboration with the Southwest Transplant Alliance. DRGs and other nervous tissues (sympathetic chain ganglia) were recovered using a ventral approach as previously described\u0026nbsp;\u003csup\u003e34,62\u003c/sup\u003e. Upon removal from the body, DRGs were prepared three different ways. One, DRGs used for histology and sequencing work were frozen in pulverized dry ice, transferred into prechilled epitubes, and stored in a -80°C freezer. Two, DRGs used for neuronal dissociation were placed into freshly prepared artificial cerebral spinal fluid (aCSF) over ice. Three, DRGs used for transmission electron microscopy were placed into 4% paraformaldehyde for 48 hours at 4°C and then transferred to 1X Phosphate Buffered Saline (PBS) and shipped on ice to the University of Adelaide in Australia. A detailed protocol of the procurement process, including recipes for aCSF, can be found on protocols.io\u0026nbsp;\u003csup\u003e34\u003c/sup\u003e.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eDonor medical history was provided by the Southwest Transplant Alliance and Anabios and includes medical details from the donor’s family members and hospital records. Donor demographics, medical history, and DRG level details (majority are lumbar DRGs) are provided in \u003cstrong\u003eSupplementary Table 1\u003c/strong\u003e. The frozen DRGs were gradually embedded in OCT in a cryomold by adding small volumes of OCT over dry ice to avoid thawing. Tissues were sectioned on a cryostat and utilized for histology and spatial transcriptomics. After sectioning, the remaining tissue blocks were wrapped in tin foil, and then returned to the -80°C freezer for future use.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eHematoxylin and Eosin staining, imaging, and analysis\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eA single DRG from 90 organ donors was sectioned at 20μm onto SuperFrost Plus charged slides (Fisher Scientific; Cat 12-550-15). The donors were randomly selected from our tissue bank as part of routine tissue morphology checking as part of our quality control process. Lumbar DRGs were preferentially selected when available in our tissue bank, but in some cases lower thoracic DRGs were used. The DRG levels that were assessed are indicated in \u003cstrong\u003eSupplementary Table 1.\u003c/strong\u003e Sections were only briefly thawed in order to adhere to the slide but were immediately returned to the -20°C cryostat chamber until completion of sectioning. The slides were removed from the cryostat and immediately immersed in 10% formalin (Fisher Scientific; Cat 23-245684) for 15 minutes. The tissues were then sequentially dehydrated in 50% ethanol (5 min; Fisher Scientific; Cat 04-355-223), 70% ethanol (5 min), and two times in 100% ethanol (5 min) at room temperature. The slides were air dried briefly, and then each section was covered with isopropanol (Sigma; L9516) and incubated for 1 minute at room temperature. The excess isopropanol was removed, and the slides were allowed to air dry again briefly (\u0026lt; 5 minutes). Hematoxylin (Sigma; MHS16) was applied to each tissue section until covered and incubated for 7 minutes at room temperature. The excess Hematoxylin was removed by tapping, and the slides were immersed 30 times in ultrapure water (dipping into the water). Bluing Buffer (Agilent; CS70230-2) was applied to each tissue section until covered and incubated for 2 minutes at room temperature. The excess Bluing Buffer was removed by tapping, and the slides were immersed 5X in ultrapure water (dipping into the water). Eosin mix (1:10 of 0.45M Tris Acetic Acid Buffer to Eosin (Sigma; HT110216)) was applied to each tissue section until covered and incubated for 1 minute at room temperature. The excess Eosin mix was removed by tapping, and the slides were immersed 15X in ultrapure water (dipping into the water). The excess water was removed from the slide using a tapping motion and Kim wipe. The slides were allowed to completely air dry before being coverslipped with Prolong Gold Antifade (Fisher Scientific; Cat P36930).\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eDRG sections were mosaically imaged at 10X using default brightfield settings on an Olympus vs120 slide scanner. The raw images were opened in CellSens (Olympus; v1.18) and qualitatively scored for the presence of Nageotte nodules throughout the entire DRG section. A qualitative scoring system (ranked from high to very low) was developed by comparing sections to one another and noting the extremes: DRG sections that had an abundance of Nageotte nodules (high) versus those with very little-to-none (very low). The person analyzing was blinded to the donor’s demographics and medical history. Once each section was scored, the medical information from each donor was probed and grouped into categories based on diagnoses of diabetes or other pain conditions. The diabetes diagnosis is known for each donor as insulin is monitored while the donors are on life support. There were 5 categories of donors: \u003cstrong\u003ediabetics with indices for peripheral neuropathy\u003c/strong\u003e (medical history statements of having peripheral neuropathy and/or amputation), \u003cstrong\u003ediabetics taking analgesics\u003c/strong\u003e (analgesic(s) usage indicated in medical history with no obvious signs of drug abuse/addiction), \u003cstrong\u003ediabetics not taking analgesics\u003c/strong\u003e (no history of taking analgesics, drug abuse/addiction included), \u003cstrong\u003enon-diabetics\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003e(no DRG-affiliated pain condition, and no diabetes), \u003cstrong\u003enon-diabetics with other pain conditions\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003e(fibromyalgia, arthritis, neuropathy, back pain as indicated in medical history). The donors included in each category are indicated in \u003cstrong\u003eSupplemental Table 1\u003c/strong\u003e.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003ePre-mounted section Immunofluorescence staining, imaging, and analysis\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp;3-4 20μm tissue sections (technical replicates) were acquired from each DRG (sample sizes indicated in figure captions) and placed onto SuperFrost Plus charged slides (Fisher Scientific; Cat 12-550-15). Slides were removed from the cryostat and immediately transferred to cold 10% formalin (pH 7.4) for 15 minutes. The tissues were then dehydrated in 50% ethanol (5 min), 70% ethanol (5 min), 100% ethanol (5 min), 100% ethanol (5 min) at room temperature. The slides were air dried briefly and then boundaries were drawn around each section using a hydrophobic pen (ImmEdge PAP pen, Vector Labs). When hydrophobic boundaries had dried, the slides were submerged in blocking buffer (10% Normal Goat Serum, 0.3% Triton-X 100 in 1X PBS) for 1 hour at room temperature. Slides were then rinsed in 1X PBS, placed in a light-protected humidity-controlled tray and incubated in primary antibody diluted in blocking buffer overnight at 4°C. A list of all primary and secondary antibodies is shown in \u003cstrong\u003eSupplementary Table 5\u003c/strong\u003e. The next day, slides were washed in 1X PBS and then incubated in their respective secondary antibody (1:2000) with DAPI (1:5000; Cayman Chemical; Cat # 14285) diluted in blocking buffer for 1 hour at room temperature. The sections were washed in 1X PBS and then covered with True Black (diluted at 1:20 in 70% Ethanol; Biotium; 23014), a blocker of lipofuscin, for 1 minute. Sections were then rinsed vigorously with ultrapure water, and then washed in 1X PBS. The slides were then air dried and coverslipped with Prolong Gold Antifade reagent. A negative control consisting of 1 section from each DRG was processed in every immunohistochemistry experiment and was exposed to all of the same reagents except for primary antibody.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eDRG sections were imaged on a vs120 slide scanner (Evident Scientific) or an FV3000 or FV4000 confocal microscope (Evident Scientific) at 10X, 20X, 40X, 60X, or 100X magnification as indicated in the figure captions. The acquisition parameters were set based on guidelines for the vs120, FV3000, and FV4000 provided by Evident Scientific. The raw image files were brightened and contrasted in Olympus CellSens software (v1.18) for display purposes. For quantification and DPN vs non-diabetic comparisons experiments, all acquisition and brightness/contrast adjustment parameters were kept the same in order to make direct comparisons between samples.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eFor the Nageotte nodule quantification experiment (GFAP + Peripherin IHC), all neurons with a visible cytoplasm (peripherin+) were counted and all of the Nageotte nodules were counted (cluster of DAPI+ nuclei and GFAP+ signal) in Olympus CellSens (v1.18). The percentage of neurons with a Nageotte nodule morphology was calculated by dividing the Nageotte nodule counts by the total neuronal population (sum of Nageotte nodules and neurons) and multiplying by 100. Three 20X mosaic sections (vs120) were analyzed per donor, and then the final percentages from each section were averaged for each donor.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eFor peripherin fiber density analysis, a single 10X confocal image (FV3000) was acquired for each section of DRG (three sections total from each DRG, 3 images/donor). A single negative control DRG section from each donor (exposed to all reagents except for primary antibody) was imaged with the same settings. The neuron-rich area of the DRG was manually outlined in Olympus CellSens (v1.18) and its area was provided by the software. The peripherin signal within the neuron-rich area was autodetected using the Count and Measure feature in Olympus CellSens (v1.18). The peripherin signal within the soma of the neurons was then manually removed in the software. The remaining area of peripherin signal (axonal only) was provided by the CellSens software (v1.18) and divided by the neuron-rich area for each section and then averaged across all sections for each DRG.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eFor the p-eIF4E experiment analysis, a mosaically tiled 20X image (Evident Scientific, vs120) was acquired for each section of DRG (three sections total from each DRG, 3 images/donor). A single negative control DRG section from each donor (exposed to all reagents except for primary antibody) was imaged with the same settings. The cell body of all neurons within the field of view were manually outlined using the Closed Polygon tool in Olympus CellSens (v1.18) and the software output the mean fluorescence intensity of the p-eIF4E signal within the ROI. This was performed on both the experimental and negative control sections. For each donor, the final p-eIF4E mean fluorescence intensity value was corrected by subtracting the mean fluorescence intensity value of the negative control.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eFilament Tracing and Free-floating Immunofluorescence staining\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp;A DPN donor with the highest Nageotte score (Donor #6) was selected for filament tracing in order to grant the highest likelihood of tracing Nageotte nodule fibers to their point of origin. For free-floating immunofluorescence staining, 50 μm DRG sections were acquired on a cryostat and then immediately submerged in 10% formalin (pH 7.4) in a 24-well plate. The sections were fixed for 15 minutes, and then washed in an adjacent well containing 1X PBS. The sections were then transferred to a well containing blocking solution (10% Normal Goat Serum, 0.3% Triton-X 100 in 1X PBS) for 1 hour at room temperature before being transferred to primary antibody (peripherin, \u003cstrong\u003eSupplementary Table 5\u003c/strong\u003e) diluted in blocking solution over night at 4°C.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe next day, the sections were washed in 1X PBS, and then placed into a well containing secondary antibody (1:2000, \u003cstrong\u003eSupplementary Table 5)\u003c/strong\u003e with DAPI (1:5000) diluted in blocking buffer for 1 hour at room temperature while being shielded from light. The sections were then washed in 1X PBS, mounted onto slides, and treated with True Black (diluted at 1:20 in 70% Ethanol; Biotium; 23014) for 1 minute. Sections were then rinsed vigorously with ultrapure water, and then washed in 1X PBS. The slides were then air dried and coverslipped with Prolong Gold Antifade reagent.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e60X z-stack images with optimal z-slices (0.3 μm) of the entire z plane were acquired on an FV4000 confocal microscope (Evident Scientific). The images were loaded into Imaris (v10), converted to IMS files, and then the peripherin signal was traced using the semi-automatic filament tracing tool. Starting points were manually selected at fibers within the Nageotte nodules, and at a neighboring neuron’s soma. The fibers were traced using the semi-automatic filament path finding tool which path finds continuous peripherin signal through the z-plane. Only fibers that originated from the Nageotte nodule arborizations or the neuronal soma and had paths that were continuously autodetected through the z-plane were traced. Other axons in the image that were not traced were either discontinuous or did not originate from the designated starting points.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eRNAscope\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e\u003cem\u003ein situ\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/strong\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e\u0026nbsp;hybridization staining, imaging, and analysis\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eDRGs were sectioned at 20μm onto SuperFrost Plus charged slides (Fisher Scientific; Cat 12-550-15). Sections were only briefly thawed in order to adhere to the slide but were immediately returned to the -20°C cryostat chamber until completion of sectioning. The slides were removed from the cryostat and immediately immersed in cold (4°C) 10% formalin (Fisher Scientific; Cat 23-245684) for 15 minutes. The tissues were then sequentially dehydrated in 50% ethanol (5 min; Fisher Scientific; Cat 04-355-223), 70% ethanol (5 min), and two times in 100% ethanol (5 min) at room temperature. The slides were air dried briefly and then boundaries were drawn around each section using a hydrophobic pen (ImmEdge PAP pen; Vector Labs). Once the hydrophobic boundaries had dried, the slides were immediately processed for RNAscope \u003cem\u003ein situ\u003c/em\u003e hybridization.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eRNAscope \u003cem\u003ein situ\u003c/em\u003e hybridization multiplex version 2 (Advanced Cell Diagnostics; Cat 323100) was conducted on human DRGs using the fresh frozen protocol as described by ACD (acdbio; manual # 323100-USM with rev date: 02272019). Hydrogen Peroxide (ACD; Cat 322381) was applied to each section until fully covered and incubated for 10 minutes at room temperature. The slides were then washed in distilled water and then were incubated one at a time in Protease III reagent (ACD; Cat 322381) for 10 seconds at room temperature. The protease incubation time was optimized as recommended by ACD for the tissue and specific lot of Protease reagent. Slides were washed briefly in 1X phosphate buffered saline (PBS, pH 7.4) at room temperature. Each slide was then placed in a prewarmed humidity control tray (ACD; Cat 321710) containing dampened filter paper (ThermoFisher Scientific; Cat 84784) and a mixture of Channel 1, Channel 2, and Channel 3 probes (50:1:1 dilution as directed by ACD due to stock concentrations) was pipetted onto each section until fully covered. This was performed one slide at a time to avoid liquid evaporation and section drying. The humidity control tray containing the slides was placed in a HybEZ oven (ACD; Cat 321710) for 2 hours at 40°C. A table of all probes used is shown in \u003cstrong\u003eSupplementary Table 5\u003c/strong\u003e. Following probe incubation, the slides were washed two times in 1X RNAscope wash buffer (ACD; Cat 310091) and then placed in 5X SSC buffer (Sigma; Cat S6639) over night at room temperature.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe following morning, the slides were washed two times in 1X RNAscope wash buffer (ACD; Cat 310091) and placed in the 40°C oven for 30 minutes after submersion in AMP-1 reagent. Washes and amplification were repeated using AMP-2 and AMP-3 reagents with a 30-minute and 15-minute incubation period, respectively. HRP-C1 reagent was applied to all sections and then incubated in the oven at 40°C for 15 minutes. The slides were then washed in 1X RNAscope wash buffer (ACD; Cat 310091). TSA Plus Akoya Dyes in Fluorescin, Cyanine-3, and Cyanine-5 (Akoya; NEL741001KT, NEL744001KT, NEL745001KT) were prepared at 1:1000 in TSA buffer (ACD; Cat 322809). The Akoya dye assigned to Channel 1 probe was applied to each section until fully covered and incubated for 30 minutes in the 40°C oven. The slides were washed and then covered in HRP blocker (ACD; Cat 323110) for 15 minutes at 40°C. The slides were washed again and then the same steps were repeated using HRP-C2 and HRP-C3 reagents with their assigned Akoya dye. DAPI (ACD; Cat 323110) was applied to each section for 1 minute at room temperature and then washed in 1X PBS (pH 7.4) before being washed, air dried, and cover-slipped (Globe Scientific; Cat 1415-15) with Prolong Gold Antifade mounting medium (Fisher Scientific; Cat P36930).\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eA positive and negative control was run on a single section from each DRG for every RNAscope experiment.\u0026nbsp;The positive control probe cocktail (\u003cstrong\u003eSupplementary Table 5\u003c/strong\u003e) contains probes for high, medium and low-expressing mRNAs that are present in all cells (ubiquitin C \u0026gt; Peptidyl-prolyl cis-trans isomerase B\u0026nbsp;\u0026gt; DNA-directed RNA polymerase II subunit RPB1) and allows us to gauge tissue quality and experiment conditions. All tissues showed robust signal for all 3 positive control probes. A negative control probe against the bacterial DapB gene (\u003cstrong\u003eSupplementary Table 5\u003c/strong\u003e) was used to check for lipofuscin and background label.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eDRG sections were imaged on an FV3000 or FV4000 confocal microscope (Evident Scientific) at 10X, 20X, 40X or 60X magnification as indicated in the figure captions. The acquisition parameters were set based on guidelines for the FV3000 and FV4000 provided by Evident Scientific. The raw image files were analyzed in CellSens (Olympus; v1.18). The True black lipofuscin quencher (used in Immunofluorescence) is not compatible with RNAscope. Large globular structures and/or signal that auto fluoresced in all channels (particularly brightest in 488 and 555 wavelengths) was considered to be background lipofuscin and was not analyzed. Aside from adjusting brightness/contrast, we performed no digital image processing to subtract background.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eTransmission electron microscopy tissue preparation, staining, and imaging\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eUpon receipt from UTDallas, the DRGs were cut into smaller pieces of about 1 mm\u003csup\u003e3\u003c/sup\u003e in size, fixed in 2.5% glutaraldehyde 2.5 % in phosphate buffer, pH 7.4 at 4°C for 24 hours, washed in PBS, and transferred into 2% aqueous osmium tetroxide solution for 1 hour. The samples were then dehydrated in a graded series of ethanol and embedded in TAAB epon araldite embedding medium at 60°C for 48 hours. Ultrathin sections of 70-90 nm thickness were cut using a ultramicrotome (Leica), stained with 4% uranyl acetate and Reynolds lead citrate for 8 minutes and examined using an electron microscope (FEI Tecnai 120kV Spirit). Images were captured using an AMT Camera with AMT_V7.0.1 software.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eDissociated neuronal cultures and Immunocytochemistry\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAfter procurement, DRGs (donors 91 and 92, \u003cstrong\u003eSupplemental Table 1\u003c/strong\u003e) in aCSF were transported to the lab over ice (~30 minutes). The DRGs were trimmed of excess connective tissue, fat, and nerve roots to expose the DRG bulb. The DRG bulb was then cut into 3mm sections and placed in 5mL of pre-warmed digestion enzyme containing 1 mg/mL of Stemzyme I (Worthington Biochemical, LS004106), 0.1 mg/mL of DNAse I (Worthington Biochemical, LS002139), and 10ng/mL of recombinant human β-NGF (R\u0026amp;D Systems, 256-GF) in HBSS without calcium and magnesium (Thermo Scientific, 14170-112). The tubes were placed in a 37° C shaking water bath until the DRG sections dissociated (4-10 hours). The solution was then filtered through a 100µm mesh strainer. The resultant cell suspension was then gently added to a 15mL tube containing 3mL of 10% Bovine Serum Albumin (Biopharm, 71-040) in HBSS. The tubes were then centrifuged at 900g for 5 min at room temperature. The supernatant was aspirated, and the pellet was resuspended in prewarmed BrainPhys\u003csup\u003e®\u003c/sup\u003e media (Stemcell technologies, 05790) containing 1% penicillin/streptomycin (Thermo Fisher Scientific, 15070063), 1% Glutamax (Thermo Scientific, 35050061), 2% NeuroCult SM1 (Stemcell technologies, 05711), 2% HyClone™ Fetal Bovine Serum (Thermo Fisher Scientific, SH3008803IR), 1% N-2 (Thermo Scientific, 17502048), 0.1% 5-Fluoro-2′-deoxyuridine (FRDU, Sigma-Aldrich, F0503), and 10ng/ml of β-NGF. Cells were plated in a 24 well plate containing 12mm coverslips which were pre-coated with 0.1mg/mL of poly-D-lysine at a seeding density of 100 neurons per well. Cells were incubated at 37°C and 5% CO2 for 3 hours to allow for adherence. Following neuron adherence, wells were flooded with 1mL of prewarmed media, and half media changes were performed every other day.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eOn DIV 3 (donor 91) and DIV 5 (donor 92), cells were washed with 1X PBS and fixed with 10% formalin for 10 min at room temperature. Cells were then washed 3 times with 1X PBS and blocked with 10% normal goat serum in PBS for 1 hour at room temperature. Cells were then permeabilized with 10% Normal Goat Serum and 0.3% Triton X in PBS for 30 min at room temperature. To label neurons, cells were incubated with peripherin (1:1000, \u003cstrong\u003eSupplemental Table 5\u003c/strong\u003e) diluted in blocking buffer overnight at 4°C. The next day cells were washed 3 times with 1X PBS and incubated with a goat anti-chicken 488 secondary antibody (1:2000) and DAPI (1:5000, Cayman Chemical, 14285) diluted in blocking buffer for 1 hour at room temperature. Cells were washed with 1X PBS\u0026nbsp;and then covered with True Black (diluted at 1:20 in 70% Ethanol; Biotium; 23014), a blocker of lipofuscin, for 1 minute. The cells were washed again in 1X PBS. Coverslips were lifted out of the 24 well plate and mounted onto glass slides with Prolong Gold Antifade reagent (Fisher Scientific, P36930).\u0026nbsp;A negative control coverslip was processed similarly in each experiment but was not exposed to the primary antibody.\u0026nbsp;All images were taken on an Olympus FV3000 confocal microscope at the University of Texas at Dallas.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eGraphing and Statistical Analyses\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eGraphs were generated using GraphPad Prism version 8.4.3 (GraphPad Software, Inc. San Diego, CA USA). Statistical analyses (either t-test or one-way ANOVA) were run in GraphPad Prism as indicated in the figure captions. Sample size is also indicated on the graphs and/or figure captions. Graphical figures were made in Biorender. Box-and-whisker plots were generated with the R ggplot2 package to visualize expression of genes in Nageotte nodule barcodes. Dot/bubble plots were generated with the DotPlot() function in Seurat (v5.0.3) to visualize expression of genes in the VISIUM data.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eSpatial transcriptomics\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eVISIUM tissue optimization and spatial gene expression protocols were followed exactly as described by 10x Genomics (https://www.10xgenomics.com/) using Haematoxylin and Eosin as the counterstain. Optimal permeabilization time was obtained at 12 min incubation with permeabilization enzyme\u0026nbsp;\u003csup\u003e41\u003c/sup\u003e. Imaging was conducted on an Olympus vs120 slide scanner. mRNA library preparation and sequencing (Illumina Novaseq, NextSeq 500, Nextseq 2000) were done at the Genome Center in the University of Texas at Dallas Research Core Facilities. DRGs from 6 DPN donors were used and processed in three separate VISIUM experiments (donors 1-4, 6, 14). The donor demographic information is provided in \u003cstrong\u003eSupplementary Table 1.\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eRaw sequencing files were processed with the 10X Genomics SpaceRanger pipeline (versions 1.1.0, 1.3.0, and 2.0.0) to generate count matrices of gene expression per VISIUM barcode for 16 DRG sections from 6 donors. VISIUM sections were examined on Loupe Browser (10X Genomics) to select for barcodes that overlapped Nageotte nodules and nearby neurons (one barcode away from Nageotte nodule). Any Nageotte nodule barcodes that also overlapped with a neuronal soma were excluded. 1094 Nageotte nodule barcodes and 1087 nearby neuronal barcodes were selected. Spatial sequencing metrics can be found in \u003cstrong\u003eSupplementary Table 6\u003c/strong\u003e.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eSpatial RNA-seq analysis\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eGene expression analysis of the barcodes was done with R (version 4.3.3) and consisted of quantification of gene expression in Nageotte Nodules, Enrichr analysis of top genes, spatial deconvolution, clustering of Nageotte nodule barcodes, and interactome analysis.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eAnalysis\u003c/em\u003e \u003cem\u003eof Gene Expression and Top Genes in Nageotte Nodules\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe raw counts from all nodule barcodes were pseudo bulked and normalized to library size, to generate counts per million (CPM) values for each gene in the Nageotte nodule barcodes. As the 10X VISIUM assay library preparation does not have a gene length bias, the CPM values were deemed sufficient to allow comparisons between genes. A recently published dataset from our group of single-nuclei RNA-sequencing from human DRGs\u0026nbsp;\u003csup\u003e63\u003c/sup\u003e was used with Seurat’s FindAllMarkers() to determine a list of neuronally enriched genes using the following criteria: 1) a difference of at least 0.1 when subtracting the percentage of non-neuronal cells that express the gene from the percentage of neurons that express the gene, 2) at least 2-fold increase between the number of non-neurons that express the gene and the number of neurons that express the gene, 3) adj. p-value \u0026lt;0.05 in neurons and \u0026gt;0.05 in every other cell type. This list was intersected with the filtered Nageotte nodule gene expression table to generate a table with 609 neuronally enriched genes, and a table with 15651 non-enriched genes.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eEnrichr Analysis\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe complete gene expression table was filtered to include only protein-coding genes and exclude genes from the mitochondrial chromosome and those that code for ribosomal proteins. After filtering, the gene expression values were re-normalized to sum one million. The top 300 genes were analyzed with Enrichr to determine ontology terms enriched in the gene set in the following databases: 1) MGI Mammalian Phenotype Level 4 2021, 2) GO Molecular Function 2023, 3) GO Biological Process 2023, 4) GO Cellular Compartment 2023.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eSpatial Deconvolution\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAll barcodes from the 16 sections with greater than 200 unique genes were processed with SONAR\u0026nbsp;\u003csup\u003e64\u003c/sup\u003e to predict cell type proportions using a signature matrix of marker genes per cell type. The signature matrix was generated by subsetting the raw count matrix of a single-nuclei dataset of human DRG cells to include only those genes that were highly enriched in a cell type (log-fold change \u0026gt; 1.0, expression in \u0026gt; 50% of cells, and adj. p-value \u0026lt; 10\u003csup\u003e-20\u003c/sup\u003e). Deconvolution results were used to estimate the contribution of different cell types to the transcriptomes of barcodes with Nageotte nodules, adjacent neurons, and all other barcodes (barcodes that overlapped both nodules and neurons were excluded from all 3 categories). They were also used to predict cell type composition of the different clusters of Nageotte nodules. \u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eClustering of Nageotte nodule barcodes\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe SCT pipeline from Seurat (version 5.0.3), followed by Harmony integration and FindNeighbors()/FindClusters(), was used to perform unsupervised clustering of the Nageotte nodule barcodes. A UMAP plot of the clustering with cells labeled by donor was used to confirm that the Nageotte barcodes did not exhibit donor-specific groupings. The cells in each cluster were pseudo bulked to obtain expression in CPM for all genes per cluster and FindMarkers() was used to determine enriched genes per cluster.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eInteractome Analysis\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eTo explore potential signaling mechanisms between Nageotte nodules and neighboring neurons, reads from neuronal barcodes adjacent to the nodules were\u0026nbsp;pseudo bulked and normalized to CPM. A curated ligand-receptor database and interactome platform (https://sensoryomics.shinyapps.io/Interactome/;\u0026nbsp;\u003csup\u003e65\u003c/sup\u003e) \u0026nbsp;were used to hypothesize interactions with ligands from each Nageotte nodule cluster and receptors on the neurons adjacent to nodules. In the first interactome analysis, to determine the top potential interactions per cluster, the interactions were ranked based on the sum of the ligand and receptor CPM expression values. In the second analysis, to determine interactions that may be more prominent for each cluster, only ligand genes that were differentially expressed (adj. p-value \u0026lt;0.05) in each cluster were used. Lastly, we also observed potential interactions with ligands from the surrounding neurons and receptors on the nodules (using only those receptor genes that were enriched in a cluster with adj. p-value \u0026lt;0.05). Ligand and receptor genes were also labeled with the protein class of their gene product using the PANTHER database\u0026nbsp;\u003csup\u003e66\u003c/sup\u003e.\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"Declarations","content":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eAcknowledgements:\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003eThe authors thank the organ donors and their families for their gift, members of the Southwest Transplant Alliance for supporting the tissue recovery work, and members of the Price lab for useful discussions.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eFunding:\u003c/strong\u003e This work was funded by NIH grants U19NS130\u003cem\u003e6\u003c/em\u003e08 and R01NS111929.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eAuthor Contributions:\u003c/strong\u003e SS and TJP wrote the manuscript, SS did the histology experiments, DTF/IS/SS conducted spatial transcriptomics, KM and AW analyzed the spatial sequencing data, RH conducted electron microscopy experiments, JL conducted the cell culture experiments, GD provided scientific/experimental input, AC/GF/PH/EV recovered DRGs from organ donors.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eCompeting interests:\u003c/strong\u003e TJP is a co-founder of 4E Therapeutics. The authors declare no other competing interests related to this work.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eData and materials availability:\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003eAll sequencing data will be deposited at SPARC and code will be made publically available on GitHub.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eMaterials \u0026amp; Correspondence\u003c/strong\u003e: All correspondence and material requests can be made to Theodore Price.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"References","content":"\u003col\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eNageotte, J. \u003cem\u003eL\u0026apos;organisation de la matiere dans ses rapports avec la vie: etudes d\u0026apos;anatomie generale et de morphologie experimentale sur le tissu conjonctif et le nerf\u003c/em\u003e. (F. Alcan, 1922).\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eLakritz, J. R.\u003cem\u003e et al.\u003c/em\u003e An oral form of methylglyoxal-bis-guanylhydrazone reduces monocyte activation and traffic to the dorsal root ganglia in a primate model of HIV-peripheral neuropathy. \u003cem\u003eJ Neurovirol\u003c/em\u003e \u003cstrong\u003e23\u003c/strong\u003e, 568-576, doi:10.1007/s13365-017-0529-9 (2017).\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eLakritz, J. R.\u003cem\u003e et al.\u003c/em\u003e alpha4-Integrin Antibody Treatment Blocks Monocyte/Macrophage Traffic to, Vascular Cell Adhesion Molecule-1 Expression in, and Pathology of the Dorsal Root Ganglia in an SIV Macaque Model of HIV-Peripheral Neuropathy. \u003cem\u003eAm J Pathol\u003c/em\u003e \u003cstrong\u003e186\u003c/strong\u003e, 1754-1761, doi:10.1016/j.ajpath.2016.03.007 (2016).\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eBurdo, T. H., Orzechowski, K., Knight, H. L., Miller, A. D. \u0026amp; Williams, K. Dorsal root ganglia damage in SIV-infected rhesus macaques: an animal model of HIV-induced sensory neuropathy. \u003cem\u003eAm J Pathol\u003c/em\u003e \u003cstrong\u003e180\u003c/strong\u003e, 1362-1369, doi:10.1016/j.ajpath.2011.12.016 (2012).\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eLakritz, J. R.\u003cem\u003e et al.\u003c/em\u003e Monocyte Traffic, Dorsal Root Ganglion Histopathology, and Loss of Intraepidermal Nerve Fiber Density in SIV Peripheral Neuropathy. \u003cem\u003eAm J Pathol\u003c/em\u003e \u003cstrong\u003e185\u003c/strong\u003e, 1912-1923, doi:10.1016/j.ajpath.2015.03.007 (2015).\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eMarshall, A. \u0026amp; Duchen, L. W. Sensory system involvement in infantile spinal muscular atrophy. \u003cem\u003eJ Neurol Sci\u003c/em\u003e \u003cstrong\u003e26\u003c/strong\u003e, 349-359, doi:10.1016/0022-510x(75)90207-5 (1975).\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eSonoda, K.\u003cem\u003e et al.\u003c/em\u003e TAR DNA-binding protein 43 pathology in a case clinically diagnosed with facial-onset sensory and motor neuronopathy syndrome: an autopsied case report and a review of the literature. \u003cem\u003eJ Neurol Sci\u003c/em\u003e \u003cstrong\u003e332\u003c/strong\u003e, 148-153, doi:10.1016/j.jns.2013.06.027 (2013).\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eFratkin, J. D., Leis, A. A., Stokic, D. S., Slavinski, S. A. \u0026amp; Geiss, R. W. Spinal cord neuropathology in human West Nile virus infection. \u003cem\u003eArch Pathol Lab Med\u003c/em\u003e \u003cstrong\u003e128\u003c/strong\u003e, 533-537, doi:10.5858/2004-128-533-SCNIHW (2004).\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eBakchine, S.\u003cem\u003e et al.\u003c/em\u003e [Central and peripheral neurologic lesions in primary Gougerot-Sjogren syndrome. Clinicopathological study of a case]. \u003cem\u003eRev Neurol (Paris)\u003c/em\u003e \u003cstrong\u003e147\u003c/strong\u003e, 368-375 (1991).\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eYoshida, M. [Neuropathology of proximal-dominant hereditary motor and sensory neuropathy (HMSN-P)]. \u003cem\u003eRinsho Shinkeigaku\u003c/em\u003e \u003cstrong\u003e23\u003c/strong\u003e, 1200-1202, doi:10.5692/clinicalneurol.53.1200 (2013).\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eScaravilli, F., Giometto, B., Chimelli, L. \u0026amp; Sinclair, E. Macrophages in human sensory ganglia: an immunohistochemical and ultrastructural study. \u003cem\u003eJ Neurocytol\u003c/em\u003e \u003cstrong\u003e20\u003c/strong\u003e, 609-624, doi:10.1007/BF01215268 (1991).\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003ePowers, J. M.\u003cem\u003e et al.\u003c/em\u003e The dorsal root ganglia in adrenomyeloneuropathy: neuronal atrophy and abnormal mitochondria. \u003cem\u003eJ Neuropathol Exp Neurol\u003c/em\u003e \u003cstrong\u003e60\u003c/strong\u003e, 493-501, doi:10.1093/jnen/60.5.493 (2001).\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003ePandya, S. S. \u0026amp; Bhatki, W. S. Severe pan-sensory neuropathy in leprosy. \u003cem\u003eInt J Lepr Other Mycobact Dis\u003c/em\u003e \u003cstrong\u003e62\u003c/strong\u003e, 24-31 (1994).\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eUmehara, F., Izumo, S., Zyounosono, M. \u0026amp; Osame, M. An autopsied case of the Crow-Fukase syndrome: a neuropathological study with emphasis on spinal roots. \u003cem\u003eActa Neuropathol\u003c/em\u003e \u003cstrong\u003e80\u003c/strong\u003e, 563-567, doi:10.1007/BF00294621 (1990).\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eReske-Nielsen, E., Reintoft, I. \u0026amp; Bomers, K. Dorsal root gangliopathia presenting with rapidly progressing sensory polyneuropathy. \u003cem\u003eClin Neuropathol\u003c/em\u003e \u003cstrong\u003e15\u003c/strong\u003e, 7-12 (1996).\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eLhermitte, F., Gray, F., Lyon-Caen, O., Pertuiset, B. F. \u0026amp; Bernard, P. [Paralysis of digestive tract with lesions of myenteric plexuses. A new paraneoplastic syndrome (author\u0026apos;s transl)]. \u003cem\u003eRev Neurol (Paris)\u003c/em\u003e \u003cstrong\u003e136\u003c/strong\u003e, 825-836 (1980).\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eMakino, M., Hiwatashi, D., Minemura, K. \u0026amp; Kawaguchi, K. Autonomic and sensory ganglionopathy occurring in a patient with fulminant type 1 diabetes mellitus. \u003cem\u003ePathol Int\u003c/em\u003e \u003cstrong\u003e66\u003c/strong\u003e, 102-107, doi:10.1111/pin.12373 (2016).\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eYoshioka, M.\u003cem\u003e et al.\u003c/em\u003e Expression of HIV-1 and interleukin-6 in lumbosacral dorsal root ganglia of patients with AIDS. \u003cem\u003eNeurology\u003c/em\u003e \u003cstrong\u003e44\u003c/strong\u003e, 1120-1130, doi:10.1212/wnl.44.6.1120 (1994).\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eBradley, W. G.\u003cem\u003e et al.\u003c/em\u003e Morphometric analysis of the peripheral neuropathy of AIDS. \u003cem\u003eMuscle Nerve\u003c/em\u003e \u003cstrong\u003e21\u003c/strong\u003e, 1188-1195, doi:10.1002/(sici)1097-4598(199809)21:9\u0026lt;1188::aid-mus10\u0026gt;3.0.co;2-o (1998).\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eScaravilli, F.\u003cem\u003e et al.\u003c/em\u003e The pathology of the posterior root ganglia in AIDS and its relationship to the pallor of the gracile tract. \u003cem\u003eActa Neuropathol\u003c/em\u003e \u003cstrong\u003e84\u003c/strong\u003e, 163-170, doi:10.1007/BF00311390 (1992).\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eNagano, I.\u003cem\u003e et al.\u003c/em\u003e Increased NADPH-diaphorase reactivity and cytokine expression in dorsal root ganglia in acquired immunodeficiency syndrome. \u003cem\u003eJ Neurol Sci\u003c/em\u003e \u003cstrong\u003e136\u003c/strong\u003e, 117-128, doi:10.1016/0022-510x(95)00317-u (1996).\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eNokura, K.\u003cem\u003e et al.\u003c/em\u003e Acute motor and sensory neuronopathy associated with small-cell lung cancer: a clinicopathological study. \u003cem\u003eNeuropathology\u003c/em\u003e \u003cstrong\u003e26\u003c/strong\u003e, 329-337, doi:10.1111/j.1440-1789.2006.00698.x (2006).\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eAmiel, H.\u003cem\u003e et al.\u003c/em\u003e [Neuropathy caused by cisplatin. 7 cases including one with an autopsy study]. \u003cem\u003eAnn Med Interne (Paris)\u003c/em\u003e \u003cstrong\u003e138\u003c/strong\u003e, 96-100 (1987).\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eKrarup-Hansen, A.\u003cem\u003e et al.\u003c/em\u003e Histology and platinum content of sensory ganglia and sural nerves in patients treated with cisplatin and carboplatin: an autopsy study. \u003cem\u003eNeuropathol Appl Neurobiol\u003c/em\u003e \u003cstrong\u003e25\u003c/strong\u003e, 29-40, doi:10.1046/j.1365-2990.1999.00160.x (1999).\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eRath-Wolfson, L.\u003cem\u003e et al.\u003c/em\u003e Morphological changes in peri-prostatic sympathetic ganglion cells in aging males. \u003cem\u003eMol Clin Oncol\u003c/em\u003e \u003cstrong\u003e6\u003c/strong\u003e, 713-717, doi:10.3892/mco.2017.1196 (2017).\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eSchmidt, R. E.\u003cem\u003e et al.\u003c/em\u003e Dystrophic axonal swellings develop as a function of age and diabetes in human dorsal root ganglia. \u003cem\u003eJ Neuropathol Exp Neurol\u003c/em\u003e \u003cstrong\u003e56\u003c/strong\u003e, 1028-1043, doi:10.1097/00005072-199709000-00008 (1997).\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003ePeters, C. M., Jimenez-Andrade, J. M., Kuskowski, M. A., Ghilardi, J. R. \u0026amp; Mantyh, P. W. An evolving cellular pathology occurs in dorsal root ganglia, peripheral nerve and spinal cord following intravenous administration of paclitaxel in the rat. \u003cem\u003eBrain Res\u003c/em\u003e \u003cstrong\u003e1168\u003c/strong\u003e, 46-59, doi:10.1016/j.brainres.2007.06.066 (2007).\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eSchionning, J. D. \u0026amp; Danscher, G. Autometallographic mercury correlates with degenerative changes in dorsal root ganglia of rats intoxicated with organic mercury. \u003cem\u003eAPMIS\u003c/em\u003e \u003cstrong\u003e107\u003c/strong\u003e, 303-310, doi:10.1111/j.1699-0463.1999.tb01558.x (1999).\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eEid, S. A.\u003cem\u003e et al.\u003c/em\u003e New perspectives in diabetic neuropathy. \u003cem\u003eNeuron\u003c/em\u003e \u003cstrong\u003e111\u003c/strong\u003e, 2623-2641, doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2023.05.003 (2023).\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eSerra, J.\u003cem\u003e et al.\u003c/em\u003e Microneurographic identification of spontaneous activity in C-nociceptors in neuropathic pain states in humans and rats. \u003cem\u003ePain\u003c/em\u003e \u003cstrong\u003e153\u003c/strong\u003e, 42-55, doi:10.1016/j.pain.2011.08.015 (2012).\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eKleggetveit, I. P.\u003cem\u003e et al.\u003c/em\u003e High spontaneous activity of C-nociceptors in painful polyneuropathy. \u003cem\u003ePain\u003c/em\u003e \u003cstrong\u003e153\u003c/strong\u003e, 2040-2047, doi:10.1016/j.pain.2012.05.017 (2012).\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eOrstavik, K.\u003cem\u003e et al.\u003c/em\u003e Abnormal function of C-fibers in patients with diabetic neuropathy. \u003cem\u003eJ Neurosci\u003c/em\u003e \u003cstrong\u003e26\u003c/strong\u003e, 11287-11294, doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2659-06.2006 (2006).\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eSerra, J.\u003cem\u003e et al.\u003c/em\u003e Effects of a T-type calcium channel blocker, ABT-639, on spontaneous activity in C-nociceptors in patients with painful diabetic neuropathy: a randomized controlled trial. \u003cem\u003ePain\u003c/em\u003e \u003cstrong\u003e156\u003c/strong\u003e, 2175-2183, doi:10.1097/j.pain.0000000000000249 (2015).\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eShiers, S., Yousuf, M. S., Mwirigi, J., Cervantes, A. \u0026amp; Price, T. Human Ganglia and Spinal Cord Tissue Procurement from Organ Donors and Tissue Quality Assessment. \u003cem\u003eprotocols.io\u003c/em\u003e, doi:10.17504/protocols.io.kqdg32qr1v25/v1 (2024).\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eKonnova, E. A.\u003cem\u003e et al.\u003c/em\u003e Characterisation of GFAP-Expressing Glial Cells in the Dorsal Root Ganglion after Spared Nerve Injury. \u003cem\u003eInt J Mol Sci\u003c/em\u003e \u003cstrong\u003e24\u003c/strong\u003e, doi:10.3390/ijms242115559 (2023).\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eMcLachlan, E. M., Janig, W., Devor, M. \u0026amp; Michaelis, M. Peripheral nerve injury triggers noradrenergic sprouting within dorsal root ganglia. \u003cem\u003eNature\u003c/em\u003e \u003cstrong\u003e363\u003c/strong\u003e, 543-546, doi:10.1038/363543a0 (1993).\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eChung, K., Lee, B. H., Yoon, Y. W. \u0026amp; Chung, J. M. Sympathetic sprouting in the dorsal root ganglia of the injured peripheral nerve in a rat neuropathic pain model. \u003cem\u003eJ Comp Neurol\u003c/em\u003e \u003cstrong\u003e376\u003c/strong\u003e, 241-252, doi:10.1002/(SICI)1096-9861(19961209)376:2\u0026lt;241::AID-CNE6\u0026gt;3.0.CO;2-3 (1996).\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eShinder, V.\u003cem\u003e et al.\u003c/em\u003e Structural basis of sympathetic-sensory coupling in rat and human dorsal root ganglia following peripheral nerve injury. \u003cem\u003eJ Neurocytol\u003c/em\u003e \u003cstrong\u003e28\u003c/strong\u003e, 743-761, doi:10.1023/a:1007090105840 (1999).\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eShiers, S., Klein, R. M. \u0026amp; Price, T. J. Quantitative differences in neuronal subpopulations between mouse and human dorsal root ganglia demonstrated with RNAscope in situ hybridization. \u003cem\u003ePain\u003c/em\u003e, doi:10.1097/j.pain.0000000000001973 (2020).\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eShiers, S. I.\u003cem\u003e et al.\u003c/em\u003e Convergence of peptidergic and non-peptidergic protein markers in the human dorsal root ganglion and spinal dorsal horn. \u003cem\u003eJ Comp Neurol\u003c/em\u003e \u003cstrong\u003e529\u003c/strong\u003e, 2771-2788, doi:10.1002/cne.25122 (2021).\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eTavares-Ferreira, D.\u003cem\u003e et al.\u003c/em\u003e Spatial transcriptomics of dorsal root ganglia identifies molecular signatures of human nociceptors. \u003cem\u003eSci Transl Med\u003c/em\u003e \u003cstrong\u003e14\u003c/strong\u003e, eabj8186, doi:10.1126/scitranslmed.abj8186 (2022).\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eHall, B. E.\u003cem\u003e et al.\u003c/em\u003e Transcriptomic analysis of human sensory neurons in painful diabetic neuropathy reveals inflammation and neuronal loss. \u003cem\u003eSci Rep\u003c/em\u003e \u003cstrong\u003e12\u003c/strong\u003e, 4729, doi:10.1038/s41598-022-08100-8 (2022).\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eToth, C., Brussee, V., Cheng, C. \u0026amp; Zochodne, D. W. Diabetes mellitus and the sensory neuron. \u003cem\u003eJ Neuropathol Exp Neurol\u003c/em\u003e \u003cstrong\u003e63\u003c/strong\u003e, 561-573, doi:10.1093/jnen/63.6.561 (2004).\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eBritsch, S.\u003cem\u003e et al.\u003c/em\u003e The transcription factor Sox10 is a key regulator of peripheral glial development. \u003cem\u003eGenes Dev\u003c/em\u003e \u003cstrong\u003e15\u003c/strong\u003e, 66-78, doi:10.1101/gad.186601 (2001).\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eFinzsch, M.\u003cem\u003e et al.\u003c/em\u003e Sox10 is required for Schwann cell identity and progression beyond the immature Schwann cell stage. \u003cem\u003eJ Cell Biol\u003c/em\u003e \u003cstrong\u003e189\u003c/strong\u003e, 701-712, doi:10.1083/jcb.200912142 (2010).\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003evan Velzen, M.\u003cem\u003e et al.\u003c/em\u003e Neuron-interacting satellite glial cells in human trigeminal ganglia have an APC phenotype. \u003cem\u003eJ Immunol\u003c/em\u003e \u003cstrong\u003e183\u003c/strong\u003e, 2456-2461, doi:10.4049/jimmunol.0900890 (2009).\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eWright, M. C.\u003cem\u003e et al.\u003c/em\u003e Novel roles for osteopontin and clusterin in peripheral motor and sensory axon regeneration. \u003cem\u003eJ Neurosci\u003c/em\u003e \u003cstrong\u003e34\u003c/strong\u003e, 1689-1700, doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3822-13.2014 (2014).\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eLee, T. J., Lee, J. W., Haynes, E. M., Eliceiri, K. W. \u0026amp; Halloran, M. C. The Kinesin Adaptor Calsyntenin-1 Organizes Microtubule Polarity and Regulates Dynamics during Sensory Axon Arbor Development. \u003cem\u003eFront Cell Neurosci\u003c/em\u003e \u003cstrong\u003e11\u003c/strong\u003e, 107, doi:10.3389/fncel.2017.00107 (2017).\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eSingh, K.\u003cem\u003e et al.\u003c/em\u003e Neuronal Growth and Behavioral Alterations in Mice Deficient for the Psychiatric Disease-Associated Negr1 Gene. \u003cem\u003eFront Mol Neurosci\u003c/em\u003e \u003cstrong\u003e11\u003c/strong\u003e, 30, doi:10.3389/fnmol.2018.00030 (2018).\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003ePischedda, F.\u003cem\u003e et al.\u003c/em\u003e A cell surface biotinylation assay to reveal membrane-associated neuronal cues: Negr1 regulates dendritic arborization. \u003cem\u003eMol Cell Proteomics\u003c/em\u003e \u003cstrong\u003e13\u003c/strong\u003e, 733-748, doi:10.1074/mcp.M113.031716 (2014).\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eDoty, M.\u003cem\u003e et al.\u003c/em\u003e Integrative multiomic analyses of dorsal root ganglia in diabetic neuropathic pain using proteomics, phospho-proteomics, and metabolomics. \u003cem\u003eSci Rep\u003c/em\u003e \u003cstrong\u003e12\u003c/strong\u003e, 17012, doi:10.1038/s41598-022-21394-y (2022).\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eVogelezang, M. G.\u003cem\u003e et al.\u003c/em\u003e Alpha4 integrin is expressed during peripheral nerve regeneration and enhances neurite outgrowth. \u003cem\u003eJ Neurosci\u003c/em\u003e \u003cstrong\u003e21\u003c/strong\u003e, 6732-6744, doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.21-17-06732.2001 (2001).\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eHikita, S. T.\u003cem\u003e et al.\u003c/em\u003e Integrin alpha4beta1 (VLA-4) expression and activity in retinal and peripheral neurons. \u003cem\u003eMol Cell Neurosci\u003c/em\u003e \u003cstrong\u003e23\u003c/strong\u003e, 427-439, doi:10.1016/s1044-7431(03)00065-4 (2003).\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eIcer, M. A. \u0026amp; Gezmen-Karadag, M. The multiple functions and mechanisms of osteopontin. \u003cem\u003eClin Biochem\u003c/em\u003e \u003cstrong\u003e59\u003c/strong\u003e, 17-24, doi:10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2018.07.003 (2018).\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eYim, A., Smith, C. \u0026amp; Brown, A. M. Osteopontin/secreted phosphoprotein-1 harnesses glial-, immune-, and neuronal cell ligand-receptor interactions to sense and regulate acute and chronic neuroinflammation. \u003cem\u003eImmunol Rev\u003c/em\u003e \u003cstrong\u003e311\u003c/strong\u003e, 224-233, doi:10.1111/imr.13081 (2022).\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eLund, S. A., Giachelli, C. M. \u0026amp; Scatena, M. The role of osteopontin in inflammatory processes. \u003cem\u003eJ Cell Commun Signal\u003c/em\u003e \u003cstrong\u003e3\u003c/strong\u003e, 311-322, doi:10.1007/s12079-009-0068-0 (2009).\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eBrina, D.\u003cem\u003e et al.\u003c/em\u003e The Akt/mTOR and MNK/eIF4E pathways rewire the prostate cancer translatome to secrete HGF, SPP1 and BGN and recruit suppressive myeloid cells. \u003cem\u003eNat Cancer\u003c/em\u003e \u003cstrong\u003e4\u003c/strong\u003e, 1102-1121, doi:10.1038/s43018-023-00594-z (2023).\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eLi, Y.\u003cem\u003e et al.\u003c/em\u003e MNK inhibitor eFT508 (Tomivosertib) suppresses ectopic activity in human dorsal root ganglion neurons from dermatomes with radicular neuropathic pain. \u003cem\u003ebioRxiv\u003c/em\u003e, doi:10.1101/2023.06.13.544811 (2023).\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eShiers, S.\u003cem\u003e et al.\u003c/em\u003e Reversal of peripheral nerve injury-induced neuropathic pain and cognitive dysfunction via genetic and tomivosertib targeting of MNK. \u003cem\u003eNeuropsychopharmacology\u003c/em\u003e \u003cstrong\u003e45\u003c/strong\u003e, 524-533, doi:10.1038/s41386-019-0537-y (2020).\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eAgalave, N. M., Mody, P. H., Szabo-Pardi, T. A., Jeong, H. S. \u0026amp; Burton, M. D. Neuroimmune Consequences of eIF4E Phosphorylation on Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy. \u003cem\u003eFront Immunol\u003c/em\u003e \u003cstrong\u003e12\u003c/strong\u003e, 642420, doi:10.3389/fimmu.2021.642420 (2021).\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eMegat, S.\u003cem\u003e et al.\u003c/em\u003e Nociceptor Translational Profiling Reveals the Ragulator-Rag GTPase Complex as a Critical Generator of Neuropathic Pain. \u003cem\u003eJ Neurosci\u003c/em\u003e \u003cstrong\u003e39\u003c/strong\u003e, 393-411, doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2661-18.2018 (2019).\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eValtcheva, M. V.\u003cem\u003e et al.\u003c/em\u003e Surgical extraction of human dorsal root ganglia from organ donors and preparation of primary sensory neuron cultures. \u003cem\u003eNat Protoc\u003c/em\u003e \u003cstrong\u003e11\u003c/strong\u003e, 1877-1888, doi:10.1038/nprot.2016.111 (2016).\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eBhuiyan, S. A.\u003cem\u003e et al.\u003c/em\u003e Harmonized cross-species cell atlases of trigeminal and dorsal root ganglia. \u003cem\u003eSci Adv\u003c/em\u003e \u003cstrong\u003e10\u003c/strong\u003e, eadj9173, doi:10.1126/sciadv.adj9173 (2024).\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eLiu, Z., Wu, D., Zhai, W. \u0026amp; Ma, L. SONAR enables cell type deconvolution with spatially weighted Poisson-Gamma model for spatial transcriptomics. \u003cem\u003eNat Commun\u003c/em\u003e \u003cstrong\u003e14\u003c/strong\u003e, 4727, doi:10.1038/s41467-023-40458-9 (2023).\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eWangzhou, A.\u003cem\u003e et al.\u003c/em\u003e A ligand-receptor interactome platform for discovery of pain mechanisms and therapeutic targets. \u003cem\u003eSci Signal\u003c/em\u003e \u003cstrong\u003e14\u003c/strong\u003e, doi:10.1126/scisignal.abe1648 (2021).\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThomas, P. D.\u003cem\u003e et al.\u003c/em\u003e PANTHER: Making genome-scale phylogenetics accessible to all. \u003cem\u003eProtein Sci\u003c/em\u003e \u003cstrong\u003e31\u003c/strong\u003e, 8-22, doi:10.1002/pro.4218 (2022).\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ol\u003e"}],"fulltextSource":"","fullText":"","funders":[],"hasAdminPriorityOnWorkflow":false,"hasManuscriptDocX":true,"hasOptedInToPreprint":true,"hasPassedJournalQc":"","hasAnyPriority":true,"hideJournal":false,"highlight":"","institution":"","isAcceptedByJournal":true,"isAuthorSuppliedPdf":false,"isDeskRejected":"","isHiddenFromSearch":false,"isInQc":false,"isInWorkflow":false,"isPdf":false,"isPdfUpToDate":true,"isWithdrawnOrRetracted":false,"journal":{"display":true,"email":"[email protected]","identity":"nature-portfolio","isNatureJournal":true,"hasQc":false,"allowDirectSubmit":false,"externalIdentity":"","sideBox":"","snPcode":"","submissionUrl":"","title":"Nature Portfolio","twitterHandle":"","acdcEnabled":false,"dfaEnabled":false,"editorialSystem":"ejp","reportingPortfolio":"","inReviewEnabled":true,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":false},"keywords":"","lastPublishedDoi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-5006011/v1","lastPublishedDoiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-5006011/v1","license":{"name":"CC BY 4.0","url":"https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"},"manuscriptAbstract":"\u003cp\u003eDiabetic neuropathy is frequently accompanied by pain and loss of sensation attributed to axonal dieback. We recovered dorsal root ganglia (DRGs) from 90 organ donors, 19 of whom had medical indices for diabetic painful neuropathy (DPN). Nageotte nodules, dead sensory neurons engulfed by non-neuronal cells, were abundant in DPN DRGs and accounted for 25% of all neurons. Peripherin-and Nav1.7-positive dystrophic axons invaded Nageotte nodules, forming small neuroma-like structures. Using histology and spatial sequencing, we demonstrate that Nageotte nodules are mainly composed of satellite glia and non-myelinating Schwann cells that express \u003cem\u003eSPP1\u003c/em\u003e and are intertwined with sprouting sensory axons originating from neighboring neurons. Our findings solve a 100-year mystery of the nature of Nageotte nodules linking these pathological structures to pain and sensory loss in DPN.\u003c/p\u003e","manuscriptTitle":"Nageotte nodules in human DRG reveal neurodegeneration in painful diabetic neuropathy","msid":"","msnumber":"","nonDraftVersions":[{"code":1,"date":"2024-09-27 08:55:19","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-5006011/v1","editorialEvents":[],"status":"published","journal":{"display":true,"email":"[email protected]","identity":"nature-communications","isNatureJournal":true,"hasQc":false,"allowDirectSubmit":false,"externalIdentity":"NCOMMS","sideBox":"Learn more about [Nature Communications](http://www.nature.com/ncomms/)","snPcode":"","submissionUrl":"https://mts-ncomms.nature.com/","title":"Nature Communications","twitterHandle":"","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":true,"editorialSystem":"ejp","reportingPortfolio":"Nature Communications","inReviewEnabled":true,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":false}}],"origin":"","ownerIdentity":"4ccd353d-0219-43b4-b8a5-9f435b709de5","owner":[],"postedDate":"September 27th, 2024","published":true,"recentEditorialEvents":[],"rejectedJournal":[],"revision":"","amendment":"","status":"published-in-journal","subjectAreas":[{"id":38231445,"name":"Biological sciences/Neuroscience/Cellular neuroscience"},{"id":38231446,"name":"Biological sciences/Neuroscience/Cell death in the nervous system"}],"tags":[],"updatedAt":"2025-05-06T07:06:24+00:00","versionOfRecord":{"articleIdentity":"rs-5006011","link":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-025-59538-z","journal":{"identity":"nature-communications","isVorOnly":false,"title":"Nature Communications"},"publishedOn":"2025-05-05 04:00:00","publishedOnDateReadable":"May 5th, 2025"},"versionCreatedAt":"2024-09-27 08:55:19","video":"","vorDoi":"10.1038/s41467-025-59538-z","vorDoiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-025-59538-z","workflowStages":[]},"version":"v1","identity":"rs-5006011","journalConfig":"researchsquare"},"__N_SSP":true},"page":"/article/[identity]/[[...version]]","query":{"redirect":"/article/rs-5006011","identity":"rs-5006011","version":["v1"]},"buildId":"qtupq5eGEP_6zYnWcrvyt","isFallback":false,"isExperimentalCompile":false,"dynamicIds":[84888],"gssp":true,"scriptLoader":[]}