The presence of generalist plants in urban greenspaces predicts pollinator diversity

preprint OA: closed CC-BY-NC-4.0
Full text 2,357 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
This is a Preprint and has not been peer reviewed. This is version 1 of this Preprint. You must log in to post a comment. There are no comments or no comments have been made public for this article. This is a Preprint and has not been peer reviewed. This is version 1 of this Preprint. Add a Comment You must log in to post a comment. Comments There are no comments or no comments have been made public for this article. Urban greenspaces are increasingly important for pollinator conservation, yet it remains unclear whether pollinator diversity is better predicted by overall plant richness or by the presence of particular plant species with central roles in the pollination network, referred to as hub species. Using community science observations from 39 urban greenspaces in Broward County, Florida, we constructed a regional plant-pollinator metanetwork and identified the five most highly connected plant species as interaction hubs. We then tested whether greenspaces containing more of these hub plants supported greater pollinator richness. Pollinator richness increased with hub plant richness, and this relationship was nonlinear, with evidence of diminishing returns as additional hub species accumulated. The observed hub set explained pollinator richness better than randomly assembled plant sets of equal size, indicating that the effect reflects the network roles of particular plant species rather than the presence of any common taxa. Our results suggest that plant identity and interaction role can outperform plant richness alone in predicting pollinator diversity in urban greenspaces. Regional metanetworks may therefore provide a practical framework for identifying plant species that disproportionately support biodiversity in fragmented urban landscapes. https://doi.org/10.32942/X2SM2Q Life Sciences Mutualistic Networks, Connectedness, Biodiversity, Citizen Science, iNaturalist, Network Hubs, Connectedness, Biodiversity, Citizen Science, iNaturalist, Network Hubs Published: 2026-05-08 23:03 Last Updated: 2026-05-08 23:03 CC-BY Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International Data and Code Availability Statement: Data and code supporting this article are available at https://github.com/jacobsfrancis/hub_plant_analysis_pub. Upon acceptance, the repository will be archived in Zenodo and the DOI will be added. Language: English

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2026) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-05-23T02:00:01.238055+00:00
License: CC-BY-NC-4.0