Cost-utility analysis of eribulin versus capecitabine in HER-2 negative advanced or metastatic breast cancer in China
preprint
OA: closed
CC-BY-4.0
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the cost-utility of eribulin versus capecitabine in the treatment of HER-2 negative advanced or metastatic breast cancer(AMBC). Methods: : Based on the data of a phase III trial, a partition survival modelwas constructed with a study duration of 10 years. Uncertainty analysis were used to evaluate the robustness of the results. Results: : The results showed that compared with capecitabine group, the eribulin group obtained 0.24 more QALY, spent $5287.11 more, and ICUR was $22084.93/QALY, which was less than the threshold. uncertainty analysis showed that the results were robust, and the probability of eribulin being cost-utility is 69.28% at the threshold of $33881.17. Conclusions: : Eribulin is cost-utility than capecitabine in the treatment of HER-2 negative AMBC.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Citation neighborhood (no data yet)
We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.
Source provenance
- europepmc
- last seen: 2026-05-19T01:45:01.086888+00:00
- unpaywall
- last seen: 2026-05-23T02:00:01.238055+00:00
License: CC-BY-4.0