Factors Associated with Perceived Discrimination in Healthcare Among Middle-Aged and Older Adults | Research Square window.SnipcartSettings = { analytics: { enabled: false } }; (function() { var accessVector = localStorage.getItem('access_vector') || ''; window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; if (accessVector) { window.dataLayer.push({ user: { profile: { profileInfo: { snid: accessVector } } } }); } })(); (function(w,d,s,l,i){w[l]=w[l]||[];w[l].push({'gtm.start':new Date().getTime(),event:'gtm.js'});var f=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0],j=d.createElement(s),dl=l!='dataLayer'?'&l='+l:'';j.async=true;j.src='https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtm.js?id='+i+dl;f.parentNode.insertBefore(j,f);})(window,document,'script','dataLayer','GTM-K279D39R'); Browse Preprints In Review Journals COVID-19 Preprints AJE Video Bytes Research Tools Research Promotion AJE Professional Editing AJE Rubriq About Preprint Platform In Review Editorial Policies Our Team Advisory Board Help Center Sign In Submit a Preprint Cite Share Download PDF Research Article Factors Associated with Perceived Discrimination in Healthcare Among Middle-Aged and Older Adults Michael D. Green, Heather R. Farmer, Hanzhang Xu, Radha Dhingra, and 4 more This is a preprint; it has not been peer reviewed by a journal. https://doi.org/ 10.21203/rs.3.rs-6507515/v1 This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License Status: Published Journal Publication published 04 Aug, 2025 Read the published version in Journal of General Internal Medicine → Version 1 posted You are reading this latest preprint version Abstract Background: Discrimination in healthcare settings impedes quality care, leading to poorer health outcomes. Objective: To examine racial differences in perceived discrimination in healthcare settings across age among middle-aged and older adults and identify factors associated with these experiences. Design: Longitudinal cohort data from the Health and Retirement Study collected between 2008 and 2020. Participants : The sample included 17,478 United States adults aged 50 and older who had at least one doctor visit or hospitalization in the prior two years. Main Measures: Self-reported perceived discrimination in healthcare settings, measured using an item from the Everyday Discrimination Scale and categorized as "never" versus "ever" experienced discrimination. Generalized linear mixed models were used to identify factors associated with experiencing discrimination. Assessed factors included sociodemographic (age, gender, marital status, education, wealth, insurance status, employment) and clinical characteristics (depressive symptoms, difficulty with activities of daily living [ADLs], number of doctor visits, hospitalizations, body mass index [BMI], and comorbidities). Results: Black adults were significantly more likely to experience discrimination in healthcare settings than White adults, and these disparities were most pronounced at younger ages. Factors associated with higher odds of reporting discrimination included Black race, male gender, not being married, being uninsured, higher educational attainment, depressive symptoms, difficulty with ADLs, history of arthritis, and higher BMI. In race-stratified analyses, unemployment was associated with higher odds of reporting discrimination among Black adults. Among White adults, being unmarried and uninsured were significant factors associated with discrimination. Conclusions and Relevance: Black adults reported higher rates of perceived discrimination in healthcare settings than White adults, especially during middle adulthood. Multiple sociodemographic and clinical factors were associated with these experiences. These findings underscore the need to address discrimination in healthcare to improve patient-provider relationships among middle-aged and older adults. Epidemiology Perceived Discrimination Healthcare Discrimination Aging Racial Disparities Health Equity Healthcare Services Quality Improvement Figures Figure 1 Figure 2 Figure 3 Introduction Discrimination within healthcare settings is a critical barrier to high quality care, impacting patient health outcomes and contributing to negative patient experiences. 1 – 4 Prior research has demonstrated that patients who experience discrimination receive suboptimal care and are more likely to be non-adherent to treatment regimens. 5 – 11 This in turn worsens health disparities and inflates long-term healthcare expenditures. 12 – 14 Discrimination in healthcare is a distinct exposure separate from general forms of discrimination that does not have an identified location of exposure. In clinical settings, patients’ unique sociodemographic, physical, and health-related characteristics (e.g., age, body weight) may lead to variations in lived experiences which consequently shapes their exposure to differential treatment, 15 alongside clinical factors which have documented racial differences in adverse outcomes. 16 Recent research demonstrates that more than one third of adults report experiencing some form of discrimination in healthcare settings. 17 However, studies have not examined the factors associated with perceived discrimination in healthcare settings uniquely among middle-aged and older adults. Understanding which sociodemographic characteristics, such as age, gender, and socioeconomic status, as well as whether certain chronic conditions and healthcare-related factors are associated with perceived discrimination in healthcare settings is particularly critical in later adulthood. Patients with different sociodemographic and clinical profiles may be treated differently, through conscious or unconscious bias, 18 which in turn can affect their help seeking behaviors, treatment decisions, and quality of treatment they receive. 12 , 19 , 20 This is especially important during middle-age and older adulthood, a period marked by increased interactions with healthcare systems, and a population who is likely subject to greater impacts by the quality of those interactions. 21 , 22 Discrimination experiences among middle-aged and older adults are critical to understanding health inequities. 23 Discrimination’s impacts are present throughout life course, where many older adults in America who faced discrimination in early life course (e.g. being denied loans, freedom to use facilities) are currently facing consequences of that discrimination (delayed retirement, age discrimination in workplace, long-term psychosocial stress). 24 – 26 Prior studies have investigated racial disparities in health systems, and found that Black adults living in the U.S. generally report more distrust in the healthcare system as well as more frequent experiences of discrimination. 9 , 27 However, it remains unclear whether these disparities persist specifically among older adults, a group with heightened healthcare needs and vulnerability to the impacts of systemic racism. 28 – 30 To address this critical knowledge gap, our objectives are twofold: first, to document racial differences in perceived discrimination in healthcare settings among middle-aged and older adults across age and second, to examine the factors associated with these reported experiences in Black and White middle-aged and older adults. Methods Data source: Our analysis used data from the Health and Retirement Study (HRS), the largest ongoing nationally-representative longitudinal study of U.S. adults over age 50. The HRS is sponsored by the National Institute on Aging (grant number NIA U01AG009740) and is conducted by the University of Michigan. 31 The HRS has accumulated over three decades of data on more than 40,000 individuals since its launch in 1992. Comprehensive details on its survey methodology and response rates are documented elsewhere. 32 Beginning in 2006, the HRS selected a random half-sample of respondents to collect detailed psychosocial data every four years. 33 , 34 Subsequent data were collected in the 2008 random half-sample and continued through 2020, providing quadrennial follow-up data for all participants. The current study included respondents aged 50 years and older who participated in the HRS Psychosocial and Lifestyle Questionnaire administered from 2008 to 2020 (n = 21,887). We excluded respondents identifying race as "other" due to insufficient detail in this category (n = 1,862). In addition, participants who reported no doctor visits or hospitalizations at baseline were not included (n = 1,364) because they did not report recent interactions with doctors or hospitals. We also excluded individuals who did not respond to the question for perceived discrimination in a healthcare setting (n = 341) described below. Finally, we excluded individuals with missing data for any of the covariates at baseline (n = 842). Individuals with missing data were presented in Supplementary Table 2. Overall, missing data was low among study participants. The final analytic sample included 17,478 participants (n = 14,134 White adults; n = 3,344 Black adults) who were followed for up to 12 years over the study period. The study was approved by the Duke University Health System Institutional Review Board (Pro00108869). Discrimination in Healthcare Settings Our primary outcome was perceived discrimination in a healthcare setting. The measure was obtained from the Everyday Discrimination Scale (EDS), 35 which consists of six items designed to measure the frequency of discrimination experienced in various daily contexts, including interactions in retail environments, restaurants, and wider social contexts. In 2008, the EDS in the HRS was updated to capture discrimination experienced in healthcare settings. This item asks, “In your day-to-day life how often have any of the following things happened to you: You receive poorer service or treatment than other people from doctors or hospitals.” Our preliminary analyses found that there was limited variability in the frequency of experiencing discrimination in healthcare settings (see Supplementary Table 1 ). We considered study baseline, the first time that they provided a response to this question. For the current analysis, we dichotomized the responses “never” as 0 for "never experienced discrimination" and 1 for "any experienced discrimination" (“less than once a year”, “a few times a year”, “a few times a month”, “at least once a week”, “almost every day”). This approach was chosen to capture the distinction between individuals who never encountered discrimination in healthcare settings and those who did, regardless of the frequency or intensity of their experiences. 36 This measure is recorded every 4 years through the HRS Psychosocial and Lifestyle Questionnaire. Covariates Sociodemographic factors included age (years), gender (female or male), Hispanic ethnicity (y/n), race (White or Black) marital status (currently married/partnered or not), educational attainment (years), total household wealth based on assets per household member (log-transformed), insurance status (uninsured or insured), and employment status (working, not working, or retired). Clinical factors included depressive symptoms assessed by a 8-item Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression (CES-D) scale (count; 0–8), difficulty with activities of daily living ([ADLs]; count; 0–6), 37 number of doctor visits in the past 2 years (count; winsorized at 50+), number of hospitalizations in the past 2 years (count; winsorized at 5+), body mass index ([BMI]; count), and self-reported doctor diagnoses of high blood pressure, diabetes, lung disease, heart disease, stroke, cancer, and arthritis. Gender, race, and ethnicity were time-constant from baseline and the remaining variables are time-varying. We also included a time-constant indicator for mortality to account for attrition due to death during the study follow-up, following previous studies. 38 , 39 Analytical approach We first assessed baseline differences between those who “never” and “any “reported discrimination in healthcare separately for Black and White adults using Mann-Whitney tests for continuous/ordinal variables and chi-squared tests for binary/categorical variables. We then used generalized linear mixed models (with a logit link function) to examine the longitudinal changes in reported discrimination in healthcare settings by race across age. This approach allowed us to account for individuals’ repeated observations (level 1) nested within individuals (level 2). Initial analyses assessed different polynomial functions of age (i.e., linear, quadratic, and cubic) based on Bayesian Information Criterion and indicated that a linear function provided best fit for the parameterization of age. We then included race, ethnicity, an interaction term between race and age, and an adjustment for mortality attrition in the model. Predicted probabilities derived from this model were used to illustrate racial differences in age-related trajectories of reported discrimination in a healthcare setting. Next, we examined which factors were associated with the likelihood of experiencing discrimination in healthcare settings in the overall sample and by White and Black adults separately. To do this, we included a wide range of sociodemographic and clinical factors in the generalized linear mixed models for the full sample and then tested interactions between race and the sociodemographic and clinical covariates. Finally, we stratified the analyses into White adults and Black adults to demonstrate the factors separately by race. All models tested for intercept and slope (i.e., age interactions) differences in the associations. Results are reported as odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI), with P < 0.050 considered to be statistically significant. Statistical analyses were conducted in Stata 18; figures were constructed in RStudio Version 2023.12.1.402. Results Table 1 presents the baseline characteristics of White and Black adults in the overall sample and by reported discrimination in healthcare settings. Overall, a higher proportion of Black adults (23.50%) reported discrimination in healthcare settings than White adults (17.50%) at baseline. For both Black and White adults, lower household wealth, being uninsured, depressive symptoms, difficulty in ADLs, more frequent doctor visits, higher BMI, and a history of arthritis were associated with reported discrimination in a healthcare setting at baseline. Table 1 Baseline Characteristics of Middle-Aged and Older Adults by Race and Experiences of Discrimination in a Healthcare Setting. Health and Retirement Study 2008–2020 White Adults Black Adults Total Never Any P-value Total Never Any P-value N = 14,134 N = 11,660 N = 2,474 N = 3,344 N = 2,558 N = 786 Sociodemographic Factors Age 66.92 (10.74) 67.32 (10.73) 65.03 (10.54) < .001 62.67 (9.23) 63.33 (9.47) 60.55 (8.04) < .001 Male 5,953 (42.12%) 4,850 (41.60%) 1,103 (44.58%) .006 1,182 (35.89%) 900 (35.57%) 282 (36.90%) .499 Hispanic Ethnicity 1,200 (8.49%) 983 (8.43%) 217 (8.77%) .581 53 (1.67%) 38 (1.52%) 2.16% .223 Unmarried 5,120 (36.22%) 4,155 (35.63%) 965 (39.01%) .002 1,941 (58.61%) 1,473 (58.13%) 468 (60.18%) .308 Educational Attainment 13.13 (2.90) 13.13 (2.89) 13.17 (2.94) .138 12.61 (2.84) 12.55 (2.81) 12.79 (2.93) .006 Total Household Wealth $ 310k ( $ 640k) $ 320k ( $ 670k) $ 250k ( $ 480k) < .001 $ 64k ( $ 130k) $ 65k ( $ 130k) $ 60k ( $ 130k) .012 Uninsured 675 (4.78%) 509 (4.37%) 166 (6.71%) < .001 309 (9.24%) 219 (8.56%) 90 (11.45%) .014 Employment Status .001 .728 Working 5,738 (40.60%) 4,678 (40.12%) 1,060 (42.85%) 1,435 (42.91%) 1,116 (43.63%) 319 (40.59%) Not Working 1,364 (9.65%) 1,090 (9.35%) 274 (11.08%) 397 (11.87%) 260 (10.16%) 137 (17.43%) Retired 7,032 (49.75%) 5,892 (50.53%) 1,140 (46.08%) 1,512 (45.22%) 1,182 (46.21%) 330 (41.98%) Clinical Factors Depressive Symptoms 1.34 (1.93) 1.21 (1.80) 1.97 (2.34) < .001 1.83 (2.11) 1.67 (1.98) 2.38 (2.41) < .001 ADLS 0.31 (0.89) 0.27 (0.84) 0.47 (1.07) < .001 0.49 (1.16) 0.44 (1.09) 0.65 (1.34) < .001 Doctor Visits 9.59 (10.27) 9.30 (9.96) 10.93 (11.53) < .001 9.39 (10.68) 8.94 (10.14) 10.87 (12.18) .001 Hospitalizations 0.46 (0.93) 0.44 (0.91) 0.53 (1.03) < .001 0.50 (1.02) 0.48 (0.97) 0.59 (1.16) .208 Body Mass Index 28.42 (5.93) 28.21 (5.80) 29.40 (6.43) < .001 30.69 (7.02) 30.55 (6.95) 31.16 (7.21) .013 High Blood Pressure 7,722 (54.63%) 6,338 (54.36%) 1,384 (55.94%) .150 2,416 (73.36%) 1,876 (74.24%) 540 (70.48%) .037 Heart Condition 3,223 (22.80%) 2,624 (22.50%) 599 (24.21%) .066 661 (19.83%) 502 (19.70%) 159 (20.23%) .746 Stroke 1,082 (7.66%) 847 (7.26%) 235 (9.50%) < .001 318 (9.51%) 249 (9.73%) 69 (8.78%) .424 Diabetes 2,722 (19.26%) 2,165 (18.57%) 557 (22.51%) < .001 984 (29.81%) 742 (29.36%) 242 (31.30%) .299 Cancer 2,132 (15.08%) 1,742 (14.94%) 390 (15.76%) .298 348 (10.53%) 260 (10.24%) 88 (11.45%) .334 Lung Condition 1,394 (9.86%) 1,098 (9.42%) 296 (11.96%) < .001 269 (8.10%) 207 (8.13%) 62 (8.02%) .917 Arthritis 8,025 (56.78%) 6,557 (56.23%) 1,468 (59.34%) .005 1,844 (55.71%) 1,379 (54.38%) 465 (60.05%) .005 Died during the study period 3,947 (28.32%) 3,258 (28.31%) 689 (28.36%) .926 693 (20.84%) 549 (21.54%) 144 (18.58%) .073 Note : Continuous variables are reported as means with standard deviations in parenthesis. Binary and ordinal variables are reported as counts (unless under 25) with percentages in parenthesis. Total household wealth rounded to nearest thousands, and reported by thousand. Statistical significance was determined with Mann Whitney tests for continuous/ordinal variables, and Chi-Squared tests for binary variables at an alpha of 0.05. Abbreviations : ADL= Activities of daily living Figure 1 illustrates the predicted probabilities from the mixed models for the age-related association between race and experiencing discrimination in a healthcare setting. Overall, the results showed that discrimination in a healthcare setting was more often reported at younger ages than at older ages. We also found that Black adults were significantly more likely to experience discrimination in healthcare settings than White adults ( P 80), there were no significant racial differences in the predicted probability of reporting discrimination in a healthcare setting. Figure 2 presents results from the generalized linear mixed models, which produced adjusted odds ratios for sociodemographic and clinical factors associated with recent discrimination in healthcare settings for all adults in the overall sample. Sociodemographic factors associated with increased odds of experiencing discrimination in healthcare included Black race (OR = 1.43, 95% CI [1.13–1.81]), male gender (OR = 1.37, CI [1.24–1.52]), not being married (OR = 1.15, CI [1.04–1.27]), and being uninsured (OR = 1.34, CI [1.11–1.63]). More years of educational attainment showed a positive association (OR = 1.05, CI [1.03–1.07]), while wealth demonstrated a negative association (OR = 0.98, CI [0.97–0.99]). Clinical factors revealed multiple significant associations with healthcare discrimination, including increased depressive symptoms (OR = 1.20, CI [1.18–1.23]), greater difficulty with Activities of Daily Living (OR = 1.13, CI [1.08–1.19]), more doctor visits (OR = 1.01, CI [1.01–1.01]), history of arthritis (OR = 1.24, CI [1.12–1.37]), and higher body mass index (OR = 1.01, CI [1.01–1.02]). Notably, when an interaction term for Black race was introduced, several significant differences emerged, specifically unemployment (P = 0.001), ADL limitations (P = 0.022), and a history of arthritis (P = 0.050). Figure 3 illustrates the factors associated with discrimination in healthcare settings for Black and White adults separately, using generalized linear mixed models to produce adjusted ORs for all model variables. Among White adults, all factors from the overall sample remained significant. In contrast, for Black adults, there were many differences between the overall sample. Not being married, wealth, higher BMI, ADLs, and being uninsured were no longer significantly associated with experiencing discrimination in healthcare settings. Unemployment emerged as a new factor significantly associated with a higher likelihood of experiencing discrimination (OR = 1.74, CI [1.27–2.39]). Both Black and White adults had significantly increased odd for reporting discrimination with a history of arthritis, higher education, depressive symptoms, male gender, and more doctor visits when examined separate. When testing the interaction between age and our covariates, we identified that for White adults there were significant slope differences across increasing age for being uninsured (P = 0.015), decreasing age while having a higher BMI (P < 0.001), and decreasing age with a history of hypertension (P = 0.044). There were not significant age-based slope differences for Black adults. Discussion Our study was the first to identify the sociodemographic and clinical characteristics of patients that are associated with reported discrimination over time, measured by age. This study showed that Black adults were significantly more likely to report discrimination in healthcare settings compared to White adults. With increasing age, however, these disparities diminished. Our findings make an important contribution to existing literature by demonstrating the longitudinal dynamics of reported discrimination in healthcare settings in a diverse sample of middle-aged and older U.S. adults. Our analysis also identified several factors that were associated with the likelihood of reporting discrimination in healthcare settings, with worse health status and difficulties in physical functioning emerging as a recurrent theme. Our findings suggest that middle-aged adults are more likely to experience discrimination in healthcare environments relative to older adults. Moreover, we found that the racial disparity in reported discrimination is most pronounced in those at younger ages (i.e., middle adulthood). These findings generally align with previous research highlighting the prevalence of race-based and socioeconomic status-based discrimination among younger adults. 40 , 41 The reasons for this are not entirely clear. For example, it is possible that the observed differences across age reflect potential cohort differences—given the U.S. historical context where older Black adults have lived through periods of legal segregation and the direct consequences of this unequal treatment. 42 , 43 Additional research is needed to better understand the factors contributing to these patterns. When considering sociodemographic, and clinical factors collectively, White and Black adults both showed a similar pattern of associations with regard to male gender, higher educational attainment, and adverse health-related status (e.g., history of arthritis and depressive symptoms) being associated with a greater likelihood of reporting discrimination. Despite these significant factors shared by Black and White adults, there were a few differences, as well. In particular, difficulty with ADLs was incrementally associated with experiencing discrimination in a healthcare setting for White adults, but not for Black adults. Previous studies using HRS data have also linked discrimination in healthcare settings to disability and worsening functional limitations. 44 , 45 Also notably, our analysis also suggests that increased frequency of doctor visits was associated with higher likelihood of experiencing perceived discrimination. Prior research has demonstrated a link between higher physician interaction, reported discrimination, and increased likelihood to delay care. 44 Taken together, it is important to further disentangle the temporal order of whether discrimination leads to a decreased desire to see physicians and/or if more doctor visits increase the risk of experiencing discrimination. A previous study has examined racial differences in health-related discrimination experiences, linking discrimination in healthcare to elevated cardiovascular biomarkers and including race and ethnicity as covariates. 46 Our research, however, stratifies by race, providing a detailed analysis of how these associations manifest across different racial groups. Among White adults, lower wealth, being uninsured, and being unmarried were associated with experiencing discrimination in healthcare settings. Conversely, among Black adults, unemployment, was a factor associated with experiencing discrimination in healthcare settings. Older adults who are unemployed (but not retired) may face unique challenges, such as limited access to healthcare resources. Consequently, if these individuals disproportionately report experiencing discrimination, this finding is particularly concerning and warrants attention. Racial inequities exist across a large range of health-related outcomes (e.g., readmissions, hypertension). 47 , 48 However, these inequities are not a random occurrence: structural racism has been widely acknowledged as a driver of inequities, in that it has a long history in the United States that has built in, fostered and normalized discrimination across multiple institutions (e.g., healthcare, employment) and continues to do so in present day. 49 Moreover, structural racism in conjunction with interpersonal discrimination is linked to disproportionately greater health consequences across the life course. 50 – 52 Some limitations should be considered when interpreting our results. First, the racial categories available for analysis were limited. Future research should broaden the racial categories beyond those used here to enrich our understanding of discrimination across different groups. Second, although our measure of discrimination was informative because it is attributed to a specific location, we could not determine the reasons why an individual felt discriminated against (e.g., age, weight, race, socioeconomic status) because it is not distinguishable among the individual items of the EDS. Other studies have identified common patterns for reports of discrimination across multiple settings, and identifying any differences in discrimination in healthcare would be an important addition to our findings. 53 , 54 This measure also was utilized as a dichotomous variable, opposed to an ordinal one which can capture variation in severity of discrimination experiences. Third, health status and clinical comorbidities were ascertained with self-reported measures that were not adjudicated. Interestingly, past research has shown that Black adults reporting racial discrimination tend to exhibit higher initial cognitive function; whereas White adults tend to have lower cognitive function. 55 Future studies with electronic health records or more frequent patient-reported outcomes could reduce potential recall bias, enhance clinical diagnosis accuracy, and allow for an overall more robust analysis of the association between discrimination and health status. Concerns surrounding accuracy and meaning of self-reported measures should also be considered for perceived discrimination. For example, individuals might face explicit mistreatment (e.g. care that does not align with clinical guidelines), but they are unaware of this mistreatment. Educational attainment has previously been connected to a higher likelihood of experiencing discrimination in general settings. 10 , 56 Our study identifies that more educated populations also experience more discrimination in healthcare settings, as well. This is important in the context that either people who are more highly educated are either experiencing more discrimination, or, potentially, that individuals with less education are less aware of discrimination. Perceptions of discrimination should be analyzed with more refined clinical context to understand how those experiences align with the treatment that the patient has received, in order to understand the most appropriate corrective action to achieve better quality care. Finally, future studies with shorter intervals between consecutive surveys capturing reported discrimination, more detailed measures of discrimination, and a wider array of social determinants of health ( e.g. , access to healthcare services and social support) could also yield valuable insights into the multifaceted influences on healthcare discrimination. Addressing these gaps can better inform targeted interventions (e.g. anti-bias training in medical education) and policies to improve healthcare equity across all demographics. Discrimination in healthcare is a detrimental experience that providers, and healthcare researchers can address though trainings in: allyship, bias literacy, and emotional regulation. 57 Our research illuminates the association of discrimination in healthcare settings with multiple facets of an individual's lived experience. The sociodemographic and clinical factors identified in this work provide much-needed insight into patient-level characteristics that likely have significance in clinical settings which could be important to consider when constructing a plan for combating discrimination in healthcare and analyzing the adverse impact it will have on population health. This study provides an important first step to help address discrimination in healthcare settings and promote equitable care for all individuals. Declarations Conflicts of Interest : N/A Disclosures : The research was supported by a National Institute on Aging (NIA) grant (R01AG069938), a NIA Diversity Supplement Award (R01AG069938-02S1), and a NIA Predoctoral Fellowship Award (F99AG088695). Dr. Thorpe was supported by P30AG059298, K02AG059140, and U54MD000214. Acknowledgements: Lauren Nichols from the Center for Data and Visualization Sciences at Duke University greatly assisted Michael Green with design elements for the forest plots and is appreciated! References Washington A, Randall J (2023) We're Not Taken Seriously: Describing the Experiences of Perceived Discrimination in Medical Settings for Black Women. J Racial Ethn Health Disparities Apr 10(2):883–891. 10.1007/s40615-022-01276-9 Mateo CM, Williams DR (2020) Addressing Bias and Reducing Discrimination: The Professional Responsibility of Health Care Providers. Acad Med. ;95(12S) Williams DR, Lawrence JA, Davis BA, Vu C (2019) Understanding how discrimination can affect health. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6773.13222 . Health Services Research . /12/01 2019;54(S2):1374–1388. doi:10.1111/1475-6773.13222 Nong P, Williamson A, Anthony D, Platt J, Kardia S (2022) Discrimination, trust, and withholding information from providers: Implications for missing data and inequity. SSM Popul Health Jun 18:101092. 10.1016/j.ssmph.2022.101092 Saif-Ur-Rahman KM, Mamun R, Eriksson E, He Y, Hirakawa Y (2021) Discrimination against the elderly in health-care services: a systematic review. Psychogeriatrics . /05/01 2021;21(3):418–429. 10.1111/psyg.12670 Powell W, Richmond J, Mohottige D, Yen I, Joslyn A, Corbie-Smith G (2019) Medical Mistrust, Racism, and Delays in Preventive Health Screening Among African-American Men. Behavioral Medicine . /04/03 2019;45(2):102–117. 10.1080/08964289.2019.1585327 Gee GC, Walsemann KM, Brondolo E (2012) A life course perspective on how racism may be related to health inequities. Am J Public Health May 102(5):967–974. 10.2105/ajph.2012.300666 Ricks TN, Abbyad C, Polinard E (2022) Undoing Racism and Mitigating Bias Among Healthcare Professionals: Lessons Learned During a Systematic Review. J Racial Ethnic Health Disparities 10(5):1990–2000. 10.1007/s40615-021-01137-x . /01 2022 Nong P, Raj M, Creary M, Kardia SLR, Platt JE (2020) Patient-Reported Experiences of Discrimination in the US Health Care System. JAMA Netw Open 3(12):e2029650–e2029650. 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.29650 Gaston SA, Forde AT, Green M, Sandler DP, Jackson CL (2023) Racial and Ethnic Discrimination and Hypertension by Educational Attainment Among a Cohort of US Women. JAMA Netw Open Nov 1(11):e2344707. 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.44707 Okoro ON, Hillman LA, Cernasev A (2020) We get double slammed! Healthcare experiences of perceived discrimination among low-income African-American women. Women's Health 16:1745506520953348. 10.1177/1745506520953348 Evans-Lacko S, Clement S, Corker E et al (2015) How much does mental health discrimination cost: valuing experienced discrimination in relation to healthcare care costs and community participation. Epidemiol Psychiatric Sci 24(5):423–434. 10.1017/S2045796014000377 Lippert-Rasmussen K (2023) Cost-Effectiveness and the Avoidance of Discrimination in Healthcare: Can We Have Both? Camb Q Healthc Ethics 32(2):202–215. 10.1017/S096318012200024X Sharac J, McCrone P, Clement S, Thornicroft G (2010) The economic impact of mental health stigma and discrimination: A systematic review. Epidemiol Psichiatr Soc 19(3):223–232. 10.1017/S1121189X00001159 Homan P, Brown TH, King B (2021) Structural Intersectionality as a New Direction for Health Disparities Research. J Health Soc Behav 62(3):350–370. 10.1177/00221465211032947 Institute of Medicine Committee on U, Eliminating R (2003) Ethnic Disparities in Health C. In: Smedley BD, Stith AY, Nelson AR, eds. Unequal Treatment: Confronting Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Health Care . National Academies Press (US) Copyright 2002 by the National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved Wang VH, Cuevas AG, Osokpo OH et al (2024) Discrimination in Medical Settings across Populations: Evidence From the All of Us Research Program. Am J Prev Med Oct 67(4):568–580. 10.1016/j.amepre.2024.05.018 Bohren JA, Imas A, Rosenberg M (2019) The Dynamics of Discrimination: Theory and Evidence. Am Econ Rev 109(10):3395–3436. 10.1257/aer.20171829 Moscoso-Porras MG, Alvarado GF (2018) Association between perceived discrimination and healthcare–seeking behavior in people with a disability. Disability and Health Journal . /01/01/ 2018;11(1):93–98. doi:10.1016/j.dhjo.2017.04.002 Benjamins MR, Whitman S (2014) Relationships between discrimination in health care and health care outcomes among four race/ethnic groups. Journal of Behavioral Medicine . /06/01 2014;37(3):402–413. doi:10.1007/s10865-013-9496-7 Vegda K, Nie JX, Wang L, Tracy CS, Moineddin R, Upshur REG (2009) Trends in health services utilization, medication use, and health conditions among older adults: a 2-year retrospective chart review in a primary care practice. BMC Health Services Research . /11/30 2009;9(1):217. 10.1186/1472-6963-9-217 Herd P, Robert SA, House JS (2011) Health disparities among older adults: Life course influences and policy solutions. Handbook of aging and the social sciences. Elsevier, pp 121–134 Thrasher AD, Clay OJ, Ford CL, Stewart AL (2012) Theory-Guided Selection of Discrimination Measures for Racial/ Ethnic Health Disparities Research Among Older Adults. J Aging Health 24(6):1018–1043. 10.1177/0898264312440322 Gee GC, Walsemann KM, Brondolo E (2012) A Life Course Perspective on How Racism May Be Related to Health Inequities. Am J Public Health 102(5):967–974. 10.2105/ajph.2012.300666 Clark R, Anderson NB, Clark VR, Williams DR (1999) Racism as a stressor for African Americans: A biopsychosocial model. Am Psychol 54(10):805–816. 10.1037/0003-066X.54.10.805 Forde AT, Crookes DM, Suglia SF, Demmer RT (2019) The weathering hypothesis as an explanation for racial disparities in health: a systematic review. Annals of Epidemiology . /05/01/ 2019;33:1–18.e3. doi:10.1016/j.annepidem.2019.02.011 Armstrong K, Putt M, Halbert CH et al (2013) Prior Experiences of Racial Discrimination and Racial Differences in Health Care System Distrust. Med Care 51(2):144–150. 10.1097/MLR.0b013e31827310a1 Farrell TW, Hung WW, Unroe KT et al (2022) Exploring the intersection of structural racism and ageism in healthcare. J Am Geriatr Soc 70(12):3366–3377. 10.1111/jgs.18105 Shippee TP, Fabius CD, Fashaw-Walters S et al (2022) Evidence for Action: Addressing Systemic Racism Across Long-Term Services and Supports. Journal of the American Medical Directors Association . /02/01 / 2022;23(2):214–219. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamda.2021.12.018 Brown TH, Lee HE, Hicken MT, Bonilla-Silva E, Homan P (2025) Conceptualizing and Measuring Systemic Racism. Annual Review of Public Health . ;46(Volume 46, 2025):69–90. 10.1146/annurev-publhealth-060222-032022 Health and Retirement Study. RAND HRS Longitudinal File (V1) (2020) Fat File (E2A), RAND HRS 2018 Fat File (V2B), RAND HRS 2016 Fat File (V2C), RAND HRS 2014 Fat File (V2B), RAND HRS 2012 Fat File (V3A), RAND HRS 2010 Fat File (V6A), RAND HRS 2008 Fat File (V3A) Health and Retirement Study (HRS) A Longitudinal Study of Health, Retirement, and Aging. Sponsored by the National Institute on Aging. Accessed 4/17/2022. http://hrsonline.isr.umich.edu/ Crimmins E, Faul J, Kim JK et al (2013) Documentation of biomarkers in the 2006 and 2008 Health and Retirement Study. Ann Arbor, MI: Survey Research Center University of Michigan Crimmins E, Guyer H, Langa K, Ofstedal MB, Wallace R, Weir D (2008) Documentation of physical measures, anthropometrics and blood pressure in the Health and Retirement Study. HRS Doc Rep DR-011 14(1–2):47–59 Williams DR, Yu Y, Jackson JS, Anderson NB (1997) Racial differences in physical and mental health: Socio-economic status, stress and discrimination. J Health Psychol 2(3):335–351 Nguyen TT, Vable AM, Glymour MM, Nuru-Jeter A (Mar 2018) Trends for Reported Discrimination in Health Care in a National Sample of Older Adults with Chronic Conditions. J Gen Intern Med 33(3):291–297. 10.1007/s11606-017-4209-5 Fonda S, Herzog R (2004) Documentation of physical functioning measured in the Health and Retirement Study and the Asset and Health Dynamics among the Oldest Old Study Farmer HR, Ambroise AZ, Green MD, Dupre ME (2024) Everyday discrimination and age-related trajectories of blood pressure among Black and White middle-aged and older adults. Stigma Health 9(4):471–481. 10.1037/sah0000524 Shaw BA, Liang J (2012) Growth models with multilevel regression. Longitudinal data analysis: A practical guide for researchers in aging, health, and social sciences. Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group, pp 217–242 Bird ST, Bogart LM (2001) Perceived race-based and socioeconomic status(SES)-based discrimination in interactions with health care providers. Ethn Dis Autumn 11(3):554–563 Everson-Rose SA, Lutsey PL, Roetker NS et al (2015) Perceived Discrimination and Incident Cardiovascular Events: The Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis. Am J Epidemiol 182(3):225–234. 10.1093/aje/kwv035 Krieger N, Embodying Inequality (1999) A Review of Concepts, Measures, and Methods for Studying Health Consequences of Discrimination. International Journal of Health Services . /04/01 1999;29(2):295–352. 10.2190/M11W-VWXE-KQM9-G97Q Institute of Medicine (2003) Unequal Treatment: Confronting Racial and Ethnic Disarities in Health Care. National Academies Benjamins MR, Middleton M (2019) Perceived discrimination in medical settings and perceived quality of care: A population-based study in Chicago. PLoS ONE 14(4):e0215976. 10.1371/journal.pone.0215976 Rogers SE, Thrasher AD, Miao Y, Boscardin WJ, Smith AK Discrimination in Healthcare Settings is Associated with Disability in Older Adults: Health and Retirement Study, 2008–2012. J Gen Intern Med. 2015/10/01 2015;30(10):1413–1420. 10.1007/s11606-015-3233-6 Nguyen TT, Vable AM, Maria Glymour M, Allen AM (2019) Discrimination in health care and biomarkers of cardiometabolic risk in U.S. adults. SSM - Popul Health 2019/04/01:7:100306. 10.1016/j.ssmph.2018.10.006 Farmer HR, Xu H, Granger BB, Thomas KL, Dupre ME (2022) Factors associated with racial differences in all-cause 30-day readmission in adults with cardiovascular disease: an observational study of a large healthcare system. BMJ Open 12(11):e051661. 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-051661 Krieger N (1990) Racial and gender discrimination: Risk factors for high blood pressure? Social Science & Medicine . / 01/01 / 1990;30(12):1273–1281. doi:10.1016/0277-9536(90)90307-E Bailey ZD, Krieger N, Agénor M, Graves J, Linos N, Bassett MT (2017) Structural racism and health inequities in the USA: evidence and interventions. Lancet 389(10077):1453–1463. 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)30569-X Carlos RC, Obeng-Gyasi S, Cole SW et al (2022) Linking Structural Racism and Discrimination and Breast Cancer Outcomes: A Social Genomics Approach. J Clin Oncol May 1(13):1407–1413. 10.1200/jco.21.02004 Churchwell K, Elkind MSV, Benjamin RM et al (2020) Call to Action: Structural Racism as a Fundamental Driver of Health Disparities: A Presidential Advisory From the American Heart Association. Circulation 142(24):e454–e468. 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000936 Brown TH, Homan P (2024) Structural Racism and Health Stratification: Connecting Theory to Measurement. J Health Soc Behav 65(1):141–160. 10.1177/00221465231222924 Cobb RJ, Rodriguez VJ, Brown TH et al (2023) Attribution for everyday discrimination typologies and mortality risk among older black adults: Evidence from the health and retirement study. Soc Sci Med 316:115166 2023/01/01/. 10.1016/j.socscimed.2022.115166 Erving CL, Cobb RJ, Sheehan C (2022) Attributions for Everyday Discrimination and All-Cause Mortality Risk Among Older Black Women: A Latent Class Analysis Approach. Gerontologist 63(5):887–899. 10.1093/geront/gnac080 Ferraro KF, Zaborenko CJ (2023) Race, everyday discrimination, and cognitive function in later life. PLoS ONE 18(10):e0292617. 10.1371/journal.pone.0292617 Assari S (2020) Social Epidemiology of Perceived Discrimination in the United States: Role of Race, Educational Attainment, and Income. Int J Epidemiol Res . /7/1 2020;7(3):136–141. 10.34172/ijer.2020.24 Vela MB, Erondu AI, Smith NA, Peek ME, Woodruff JN, Chin MH (2022) Eliminating Explicit and Implicit Biases in Health Care: Evidence and Research Needs. Annual Review of Public Health . ;43(Volume 43, 2022):477–501. 10.1146/annurev-publhealth-052620-103528 Additional Declarations The authors declare no competing interests. Supplementary Files ResearchSquareRevision1SupplementaryFile.docx Cite Share Download PDF Status: Published Journal Publication published 04 Aug, 2025 Read the published version in Journal of General Internal Medicine → Version 1 posted You are reading this latest preprint version Research Square lets you share your work early, gain feedback from the community, and start making changes to your manuscript prior to peer review in a journal. As a division of Research Square Company, we’re committed to making research communication faster, fairer, and more useful. We do this by developing innovative software and high quality services for the global research community. Our growing team is made up of researchers and industry professionals working together to solve the most critical problems facing scientific publishing. Also discoverable on Platform About Our Team In Review Editorial Policies Advisory Board Help Center Resources Author Services Accessibility API Access RSS feed Manage Cookie Preferences © Research Square 2026 | ISSN 2693-5015 (online) Privacy Policy Terms of Service Do Not Sell My Personal Information {"props":{"pageProps":{"initialData":{"identity":"rs-6507515","acceptedTermsAndConditions":true,"allowDirectSubmit":true,"archivedVersions":[],"articleType":"Research Article","associatedPublications":[],"authors":[{"id":446583173,"identity":"9ae13cb8-641f-41d9-b71b-3e3ea38f17bb","order_by":0,"name":"Michael D. Green","email":"","orcid":"https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4982-8154","institution":"Duke University School of Medicine","correspondingAuthor":true,"prefix":"","firstName":"Michael","middleName":"D.","lastName":"Green","suffix":""},{"id":446583174,"identity":"c42641c5-0416-4f49-afb2-a238f8b24caa","order_by":1,"name":"Heather R. Farmer","email":"","orcid":"https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3889-548X","institution":"University of Delaware","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Heather","middleName":"R.","lastName":"Farmer","suffix":""},{"id":446583175,"identity":"569bf842-0dcf-4d82-b6a6-ba5025277292","order_by":2,"name":"Hanzhang Xu","email":"","orcid":"https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9617-247X","institution":"Duke University School of Nursing","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Hanzhang","middleName":"","lastName":"Xu","suffix":""},{"id":446583176,"identity":"d2597714-cd64-46be-814d-dc913ba62f2e","order_by":3,"name":"Radha Dhingra","email":"","orcid":"https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1921-9136","institution":"Duke University School of Medicine","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Radha","middleName":"","lastName":"Dhingra","suffix":""},{"id":446583177,"identity":"3985e84d-1ecc-45bd-a95e-93f9bfaa08eb","order_by":4,"name":"Qing Yang","email":"","orcid":"https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4844-4690","institution":"Duke University School of Nursing","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Qing","middleName":"","lastName":"Yang","suffix":""},{"id":446583178,"identity":"e9670442-5962-4ca3-9203-52aa5be21da2","order_by":5,"name":"Roland J. Thorpe Jr.","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Roland","middleName":"J.","lastName":"Thorpe","suffix":"Jr."},{"id":446583179,"identity":"6e5c2990-0b15-41b5-95e2-e6b2eb2b5a8b","order_by":6,"name":"LáShauntá M. Glover","email":"","orcid":"https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7721-8169","institution":"Duke University School of Medicine","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"LáShauntá","middleName":"M.","lastName":"Glover","suffix":""},{"id":446583180,"identity":"032d94a4-1aeb-4d2e-95b9-613ccdaee6a1","order_by":7,"name":"Matthew E. Dupre","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Duke University School of Medicine","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Matthew","middleName":"E.","lastName":"Dupre","suffix":""}],"badges":[],"createdAt":"2025-04-22 22:52:08","currentVersionCode":1,"declarations":{"humanSubjects":true,"vertebrateSubjects":false,"conflictsOfInterestStatement":false,"humanSubjectEthicalGuidelines":true,"humanSubjectConsent":true,"humanSubjectClinicalTrial":false,"humanSubjectCaseReport":false,"vertebrateSubjectEthicalGuidelines":false},"doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-6507515/v1","doiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-6507515/v1","draftVersion":[],"editorialEvents":[{"content":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-025-09796-w","type":"published","date":"2025-08-05T00:00:00+00:00"}],"editorialNote":"","failedWorkflow":false,"files":[{"id":81846414,"identity":"4bfa5e89-0c6f-41ea-b7e7-39bc1b8caaa3","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-05-02 17:55:51","extension":"png","order_by":1,"title":"Figure 1","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":60119,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003ePredicted \u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp;Probabilities of Reporting Discrimination in Healthcare Settings Among U.S. \u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp;Middle-Aged and Older Adults, Health and Retirement Study (2008-2020)\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eNote: \u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp;Plots are based on mixed models with indicators for Black race (P\u0026lt;0.001), \u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp;interactions with time (race*age; P=0.013), Hispanic ethnicity (P=0.713), \u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp;mortality over the study period (P\u0026lt;0.001), male gender (P=0.002). Shaded \u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp;areas represent 95% confidence intervals.\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"1.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-6507515/v1/6aeb27bbc9bd09dc70db751c.png"},{"id":81846411,"identity":"e449649f-5c0e-4124-9e93-8f5676674afc","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-05-02 17:55:51","extension":"png","order_by":2,"title":"Figure 2","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":56709,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003eAdjusted Odds Ratios (95% Confidence \u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp;Intervals) for the Factors Associated with Reporting Discrimination in \u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp;Healthcare Settings Among U.S. Middle-aged and Older Adults, Health and \u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp;Retirement Study (2008-2020)\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eNote: Statistically \u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp;significant values (P \u0026lt; 0.05) are bolded in black. Wealth variable log \u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp;transformed. Time constant mortality to account for attrition, and an \u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp;interaction between Black race and age were components of the model.\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"2.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-6507515/v1/7ef9e7aa92d0f63e40d5abd5.png"},{"id":81846412,"identity":"6d71e6a9-2c26-48df-b412-b92b2b198fc1","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-05-02 17:55:51","extension":"png","order_by":3,"title":"Figure 3","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":90464,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003eAdjusted Odds Ratios (95% Confidence \u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp;Intervals) for the Factors Associated with Reporting Discrimination in \u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp;Healthcare Settings Among Black and White U.S. Middle-aged and Older Adults, \u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp;Health and Retirement Study (2008-2020)\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eNote: Statistically significant \u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp;values (P \u0026lt; 0.05) are bolded in black. Wealth variable log transformed. \u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp;Time-constant mortality was a component of each model to account for \u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp;attrition.\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"3.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-6507515/v1/689c275ecb8c54f1746fc6d8.png"},{"id":88444415,"identity":"e3781efb-d80a-4496-b8f8-cf6cc461f606","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-08-06 13:24:00","extension":"pdf","order_by":0,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"manuscript-pdf","size":913387,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"manuscript.pdf","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-6507515/v1/af128d11-151e-4ea7-b3d3-caff07309816.pdf"},{"id":81847254,"identity":"c8f2bb91-7721-441d-9bb8-4230e014e680","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-05-02 18:11:51","extension":"docx","order_by":1,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"supplement","size":25965,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"ResearchSquareRevision1SupplementaryFile.docx","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-6507515/v1/0222344ef8f1bfe467c04fab.docx"}],"financialInterests":"The authors declare no competing interests.","formattedTitle":"\u003cp\u003eFactors Associated with Perceived Discrimination in Healthcare Among Middle-Aged and Older Adults\u003c/p\u003e","fulltext":[{"header":"Introduction","content":"\u003cp\u003eDiscrimination within healthcare settings is a critical barrier to high quality care, impacting patient health outcomes and contributing to negative patient experiences.\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan additionalcitationids=\"CR2 CR3\" citationid=\"CR1\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1\u003c/span\u003e\u0026ndash;\u003cspan citationid=\"CR4\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e4\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e Prior research has demonstrated that patients who experience discrimination receive suboptimal care and are more likely to be non-adherent to treatment regimens.\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan additionalcitationids=\"CR6 CR7 CR8 CR9 CR10\" citationid=\"CR5\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e5\u003c/span\u003e\u0026ndash;\u003cspan citationid=\"CR11\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e11\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e This in turn worsens health disparities and inflates long-term healthcare expenditures.\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan additionalcitationids=\"CR13\" citationid=\"CR12\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e12\u003c/span\u003e\u0026ndash;\u003cspan citationid=\"CR14\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e14\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eDiscrimination in healthcare is a distinct exposure separate from general forms of discrimination that does not have an identified location of exposure. In clinical settings, patients\u0026rsquo; unique sociodemographic, physical, and health-related characteristics (e.g., age, body weight) may lead to variations in lived experiences which consequently shapes their exposure to differential treatment,\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR15\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e15\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e alongside clinical factors which have documented racial differences in adverse outcomes.\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR16\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e16\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e Recent research demonstrates that more than one third of adults report experiencing some form of discrimination in healthcare settings.\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR17\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e17\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e However, studies have not examined the factors associated with perceived discrimination in healthcare settings uniquely among middle-aged and older adults. Understanding which sociodemographic characteristics, such as age, gender, and socioeconomic status, as well as whether certain chronic conditions and healthcare-related factors are associated with perceived discrimination in healthcare settings is particularly critical in later adulthood. Patients with different sociodemographic and clinical profiles may be treated differently, through conscious or unconscious bias,\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR18\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e18\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e which in turn can affect their help seeking behaviors, treatment decisions, and quality of treatment they receive.\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR12\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e12\u003c/span\u003e,\u003cspan citationid=\"CR19\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e19\u003c/span\u003e,\u003cspan citationid=\"CR20\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e20\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e This is especially important during middle-age and older adulthood, a period marked by increased interactions with healthcare systems, and a population who is likely subject to greater impacts by the quality of those interactions.\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR21\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e21\u003c/span\u003e,\u003cspan citationid=\"CR22\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e22\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eDiscrimination experiences among middle-aged and older adults are critical to understanding health inequities.\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR23\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e23\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e Discrimination\u0026rsquo;s impacts are present throughout life course, where many older adults in America who faced discrimination in early life course (e.g. being denied loans, freedom to use facilities) are currently facing consequences of that discrimination (delayed retirement, age discrimination in workplace, long-term psychosocial stress).\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan additionalcitationids=\"CR25\" citationid=\"CR24\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e24\u003c/span\u003e\u0026ndash;\u003cspan citationid=\"CR26\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e26\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e Prior studies have investigated racial disparities in health systems, and found that Black adults living in the U.S. generally report more distrust in the healthcare system as well as more frequent experiences of discrimination.\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR9\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e9\u003c/span\u003e,\u003cspan citationid=\"CR27\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e27\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e However, it remains unclear whether these disparities persist specifically among older adults, a group with heightened healthcare needs and vulnerability to the impacts of systemic racism.\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan additionalcitationids=\"CR29\" citationid=\"CR28\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e28\u003c/span\u003e\u0026ndash;\u003cspan citationid=\"CR30\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e30\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eTo address this critical knowledge gap, our objectives are twofold: first, to document racial differences in perceived discrimination in healthcare settings among middle-aged and older adults across age and second, to examine the factors associated with these reported experiences in Black and White middle-aged and older adults.\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"Methods","content":"\u003cdiv id=\"Sec3\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003eData source:\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eOur analysis used data from the Health and Retirement Study (HRS), the largest ongoing nationally-representative longitudinal study of U.S. adults over age 50. The HRS is sponsored by the National Institute on Aging (grant number NIA U01AG009740) and is conducted by the University of Michigan.\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR31\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e31\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e The HRS has accumulated over three decades of data on more than 40,000 individuals since its launch in 1992. Comprehensive details on its survey methodology and response rates are documented elsewhere.\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR32\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e32\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e Beginning in 2006, the HRS selected a random half-sample of respondents to collect detailed psychosocial data every four years.\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR33\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e33\u003c/span\u003e,\u003cspan citationid=\"CR34\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e34\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e Subsequent data were collected in the 2008 random half-sample and continued through 2020, providing quadrennial follow-up data for all participants.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe current study included respondents aged 50 years and older who participated in the HRS Psychosocial and Lifestyle Questionnaire administered from 2008 to 2020 (n\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;21,887). We excluded respondents identifying race as \"other\" due to insufficient detail in this category (n\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;1,862). In addition, participants who reported no doctor visits or hospitalizations at baseline were not included (n\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;1,364) because they did not report recent interactions with doctors or hospitals. We also excluded individuals who did not respond to the question for perceived discrimination in a healthcare setting (n\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;341) described below. Finally, we excluded individuals with missing data for any of the covariates at baseline (n\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;842). Individuals with missing data were presented in Supplementary Table\u0026nbsp;2. Overall, missing data was low among study participants.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe final analytic sample included 17,478 participants (n\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;14,134 White adults; n\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;3,344 Black adults) who were followed for up to 12 years over the study period. The study was approved by the Duke University Health System Institutional Review Board (Pro00108869).\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e\n\u003ch3\u003eDiscrimination in Healthcare Settings\u003c/h3\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eOur primary outcome was perceived discrimination in a healthcare setting. The measure was obtained from the Everyday Discrimination Scale (EDS),\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR35\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e35\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e which consists of six items designed to measure the frequency of discrimination experienced in various daily contexts, including interactions in retail environments, restaurants, and wider social contexts. In 2008, the EDS in the HRS was updated to capture discrimination experienced in healthcare settings. This item asks, \u0026ldquo;In your day-to-day life how often have any of the following things happened to you: You receive poorer service or treatment than other people from doctors or hospitals.\u0026rdquo; Our preliminary analyses found that there was limited variability in the frequency of experiencing discrimination in healthcare settings (see \u003cspan type=\"Underline\" class=\"Underline\" name=\"Emphasis\"\u003eSupplementary Table\u0026nbsp;1\u003c/span\u003e). We considered study baseline, the first time that they provided a response to this question. For the current analysis, we dichotomized the responses \u0026ldquo;never\u0026rdquo; as 0 for \"never experienced discrimination\" and 1 for \"any experienced discrimination\" (\u0026ldquo;less than once a year\u0026rdquo;, \u0026ldquo;a few times a year\u0026rdquo;, \u0026ldquo;a few times a month\u0026rdquo;, \u0026ldquo;at least once a week\u0026rdquo;, \u0026ldquo;almost every day\u0026rdquo;). This approach was chosen to capture the distinction between individuals who never encountered discrimination in healthcare settings and those who did, regardless of the frequency or intensity of their experiences.\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR36\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e36\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e This measure is recorded every 4 years through the HRS Psychosocial and Lifestyle Questionnaire.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003ch3\u003eCovariates\u003c/h3\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e \u003cem\u003eSociodemographic\u003c/em\u003e factors included age (years), gender (female or male), Hispanic ethnicity (y/n), race (White or Black) marital status (currently married/partnered or not), educational attainment (years), total household wealth based on assets per household member (log-transformed), insurance status (uninsured or insured), and employment status (working, not working, or retired). \u003cem\u003eClinical\u003c/em\u003e factors included depressive symptoms assessed by a 8-item Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression (CES-D) scale (count; 0\u0026ndash;8), difficulty with activities of daily living ([ADLs]; count; 0\u0026ndash;6),\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR37\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e37\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e number of doctor visits in the past 2 years (count; winsorized at 50+), number of hospitalizations in the past 2 years (count; winsorized at 5+), body mass index ([BMI]; count), and self-reported doctor diagnoses of high blood pressure, diabetes, lung disease, heart disease, stroke, cancer, and arthritis. Gender, race, and ethnicity were time-constant from baseline and the remaining variables are time-varying. We also included a time-constant indicator for mortality to account for attrition due to death during the study follow-up, following previous studies.\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR38\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e38\u003c/span\u003e,\u003cspan citationid=\"CR39\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e39\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003ch3\u003eAnalytical approach\u003c/h3\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eWe first assessed baseline differences between those who \u0026ldquo;never\u0026rdquo; and \u0026ldquo;any \u0026ldquo;reported discrimination in healthcare separately for Black and White adults using Mann-Whitney tests for continuous/ordinal variables and chi-squared tests for binary/categorical variables. We then used generalized linear mixed models (with a logit link function) to examine the longitudinal changes in reported discrimination in healthcare settings by race across age. This approach allowed us to account for individuals\u0026rsquo; repeated observations (level 1) nested within individuals (level 2). Initial analyses assessed different polynomial functions of age (i.e., linear, quadratic, and cubic) based on Bayesian Information Criterion and indicated that a linear function provided best fit for the parameterization of age. We then included race, ethnicity, an interaction term between race and age, and an adjustment for mortality attrition in the model. Predicted probabilities derived from this model were used to illustrate racial differences in age-related trajectories of reported discrimination in a healthcare setting.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eNext, we examined which factors were associated with the likelihood of experiencing discrimination in healthcare settings in the overall sample and by White and Black adults separately. To do this, we included a wide range of sociodemographic and clinical factors in the generalized linear mixed models for the full sample and then tested interactions between race and the sociodemographic and clinical covariates. Finally, we stratified the analyses into White adults and Black adults to demonstrate the factors separately by race. All models tested for intercept and slope (i.e., age interactions) differences in the associations. Results are reported as odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI), with \u003cem\u003eP\u003c/em\u003e\u0026thinsp;\u0026lt;\u0026thinsp;0.050 considered to be statistically significant. Statistical analyses were conducted in Stata 18; figures were constructed in RStudio Version 2023.12.1.402.\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"Results","content":"\u003cp\u003eTable \u003cspan class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e1\u003c/span\u003e presents the baseline characteristics of White and Black adults in the overall sample and by reported discrimination in healthcare settings. Overall, a higher proportion of Black adults (23.50%) reported discrimination in healthcare settings than White adults (17.50%) at baseline. For both Black and White adults, lower household wealth, being uninsured, depressive symptoms, difficulty in ADLs, more frequent doctor visits, higher BMI, and a history of arthritis were associated with reported discrimination in a healthcare setting at baseline.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003ctable id=\"Tab1\" border=\"1\"\u003e\n \u003ccaption language=\"En\"\u003e\n \u003cdiv class=\"CaptionNumber\"\u003eTable 1\u003c/div\u003e\n \u003cdiv class=\"CaptionContent\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eBaseline Characteristics of Middle-Aged and Older Adults by Race and Experiences of Discrimination in a Healthcare Setting. Health and Retirement Study 2008\u0026ndash;2020\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/div\u003e\n \u003c/caption\u003e\n \u003cthead\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003cth align=\"left\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/th\u003e\n \u003cth align=\"left\" colspan=\"4\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eWhite Adults\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/th\u003e\n \u003cth align=\"left\" colspan=\"4\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eBlack Adults\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/th\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003c/thead\u003e\n \u003ctbody\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eTotal\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eNever\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eAny\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eP-value\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eTotal\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eNever\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eAny\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eP-value\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eN\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;14,134\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eN\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;11,660\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eN\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;2,474\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eN\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;3,344\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eN\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;2,558\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eN\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;786\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\" colspan=\"9\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eSociodemographic Factors\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eAge\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e66.92 (10.74)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e67.32 (10.73)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e65.03 (10.54)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026lt;\u0026thinsp;.001\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e62.67 (9.23)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e63.33 (9.47)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e60.55 (8.04)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026lt;\u0026thinsp;.001\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eMale\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e5,953 (42.12%)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e4,850 (41.60%)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e1,103 (44.58%)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e.006\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e1,182 (35.89%)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e900 (35.57%)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e282 (36.90%)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e.499\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eHispanic Ethnicity\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e1,200 (8.49%)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e983 (8.43%)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e217 (8.77%)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e.581\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e53 (1.67%)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e38 (1.52%)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e2.16%\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e.223\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eUnmarried\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e5,120 (36.22%)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e4,155 (35.63%)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e965 (39.01%)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e.002\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e1,941 (58.61%)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e1,473 (58.13%)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e468 (60.18%)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e.308\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eEducational Attainment\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e13.13 (2.90)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e13.13 (2.89)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e13.17 (2.94)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e.138\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e12.61 (2.84)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e12.55 (2.81)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e12.79 (2.93)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e.006\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eTotal Household Wealth\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cspan\u003e$\u003c/span\u003e310k (\u003cspan\u003e$\u003c/span\u003e640k)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cspan\u003e$\u003c/span\u003e320k (\u003cspan\u003e$\u003c/span\u003e670k)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cspan\u003e$\u003c/span\u003e250k (\u003cspan\u003e$\u003c/span\u003e480k)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026lt;\u0026thinsp;.001\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cspan\u003e$\u003c/span\u003e64k (\u003cspan\u003e$\u003c/span\u003e130k)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cspan\u003e$\u003c/span\u003e65k (\u003cspan\u003e$\u003c/span\u003e130k)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cspan\u003e$\u003c/span\u003e60k (\u003cspan\u003e$\u003c/span\u003e130k)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e.012\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eUninsured\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e675 (4.78%)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e509 (4.37%)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e166 (6.71%)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026lt;\u0026thinsp;.001\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e309 (9.24%)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e219 (8.56%)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e90 (11.45%)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e.014\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eEmployment Status\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e.001\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e.728\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eWorking\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e5,738 (40.60%)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e4,678 (40.12%)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e1,060 (42.85%)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e1,435 (42.91%)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e1,116 (43.63%)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e319 (40.59%)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eNot Working\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e1,364 (9.65%)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e1,090 (9.35%)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e274 (11.08%)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e397 (11.87%)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e260 (10.16%)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e137 (17.43%)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eRetired\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e7,032 (49.75%)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e5,892 (50.53%)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e1,140 (46.08%)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e1,512 (45.22%)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e1,182 (46.21%)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e330 (41.98%)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\" colspan=\"9\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eClinical Factors\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eDepressive Symptoms\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e1.34 (1.93)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e1.21 (1.80)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e1.97 (2.34)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026lt;\u0026thinsp;.001\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e1.83 (2.11)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e1.67 (1.98)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e2.38 (2.41)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026lt;\u0026thinsp;.001\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eADLS\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.31 (0.89)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.27 (0.84)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.47 (1.07)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026lt;\u0026thinsp;.001\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.49 (1.16)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.44 (1.09)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.65 (1.34)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026lt;\u0026thinsp;.001\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eDoctor Visits\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e9.59 (10.27)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e9.30 (9.96)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e10.93 (11.53)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026lt;\u0026thinsp;.001\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e9.39 (10.68)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e8.94 (10.14)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e10.87 (12.18)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e.001\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eHospitalizations\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.46 (0.93)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.44 (0.91)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.53 (1.03)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026lt;\u0026thinsp;.001\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.50 (1.02)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.48 (0.97)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.59 (1.16)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e.208\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eBody Mass Index\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e28.42 (5.93)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e28.21 (5.80)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e29.40 (6.43)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026lt;\u0026thinsp;.001\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e30.69 (7.02)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e30.55 (6.95)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e31.16 (7.21)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e.013\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eHigh Blood Pressure\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e7,722 (54.63%)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e6,338 (54.36%)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e1,384 (55.94%)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e.150\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e2,416 (73.36%)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e1,876 (74.24%)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e540 (70.48%)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e.037\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eHeart Condition\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e3,223 (22.80%)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e2,624 (22.50%)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e599 (24.21%)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e.066\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e661 (19.83%)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e502 (19.70%)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e159 (20.23%)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e.746\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eStroke\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e1,082 (7.66%)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e847 (7.26%)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e235 (9.50%)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026lt;\u0026thinsp;.001\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e318 (9.51%)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e249 (9.73%)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e69 (8.78%)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e.424\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eDiabetes\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e2,722 (19.26%)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e2,165 (18.57%)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e557 (22.51%)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026lt;\u0026thinsp;.001\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e984 (29.81%)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e742 (29.36%)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e242 (31.30%)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e.299\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eCancer\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e2,132 (15.08%)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e1,742 (14.94%)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e390 (15.76%)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e.298\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e348 (10.53%)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e260 (10.24%)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e88 (11.45%)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e.334\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eLung Condition\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e1,394 (9.86%)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e1,098 (9.42%)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e296 (11.96%)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026lt;\u0026thinsp;.001\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e269 (8.10%)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e207 (8.13%)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e62 (8.02%)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e.917\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eArthritis\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e8,025 (56.78%)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e6,557 (56.23%)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e1,468 (59.34%)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e.005\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e1,844 (55.71%)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e1,379 (54.38%)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e465 (60.05%)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e.005\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eDied during the study period\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e3,947 (28.32%)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e3,258 (28.31%)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e689 (28.36%)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e.926\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e693 (20.84%)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e549 (21.54%)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e144 (18.58%)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e.073\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\" colspan=\"9\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cspan type=\"ItalicUnderline\" class=\"ItalicUnderline\" name=\"Emphasis\"\u003eNote\u003c/span\u003e: Continuous variables are reported as means with standard deviations in parenthesis. Binary and ordinal variables are reported as counts (unless under 25) with percentages in parenthesis. Total household wealth rounded to nearest thousands, and reported by thousand. Statistical significance was determined with Mann Whitney tests for continuous/ordinal variables, and Chi-Squared tests for binary variables at an alpha of 0.05. \u003cem\u003eAbbreviations\u003c/em\u003e: ADL= Activities of daily living\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003c/tbody\u003e\n\u003c/table\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eFigure 1 illustrates the predicted probabilities from the mixed models for the age-related association between race and experiencing discrimination in a healthcare setting. Overall, the results showed that discrimination in a healthcare setting was more often reported at younger ages than at older ages. We also found that Black adults were significantly more likely to experience discrimination in healthcare settings than White adults (\u003cem\u003eP\u003c/em\u003e\u0026thinsp;\u0026lt;\u0026thinsp;0.001), and that these disparities were most pronounced at younger ages (race*age interaction: \u003cem\u003eP\u003c/em\u003e\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;0.013). By later life (ages\u0026thinsp;\u0026gt;\u0026thinsp;80), there were no significant racial differences in the predicted probability of reporting discrimination in a healthcare setting.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eFigure 2 presents results from the generalized linear mixed models, which produced adjusted odds ratios for sociodemographic and clinical factors associated with recent discrimination in healthcare settings for all adults in the overall sample. Sociodemographic factors associated with increased odds of experiencing discrimination in healthcare included Black race (OR\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;1.43, 95% CI [1.13\u0026ndash;1.81]), male gender (OR\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;1.37, CI [1.24\u0026ndash;1.52]), not being married (OR\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;1.15, CI [1.04\u0026ndash;1.27]), and being uninsured (OR\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;1.34, CI [1.11\u0026ndash;1.63]). More years of educational attainment showed a positive association (OR\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;1.05, CI [1.03\u0026ndash;1.07]), while wealth demonstrated a negative association (OR\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;0.98, CI [0.97\u0026ndash;0.99]). Clinical factors revealed multiple significant associations with healthcare discrimination, including increased depressive symptoms (OR\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;1.20, CI [1.18\u0026ndash;1.23]), greater difficulty with Activities of Daily Living (OR\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;1.13, CI [1.08\u0026ndash;1.19]), more doctor visits (OR\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;1.01, CI [1.01\u0026ndash;1.01]), history of arthritis (OR\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;1.24, CI [1.12\u0026ndash;1.37]), and higher body mass index (OR\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;1.01, CI [1.01\u0026ndash;1.02]). Notably, when an interaction term for Black race was introduced, several significant differences emerged, specifically unemployment (P\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;0.001), ADL limitations (P\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;0.022), and a history of arthritis (P\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;0.050).\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eFigure 3 illustrates the factors associated with discrimination in healthcare settings for Black and White adults separately, using generalized linear mixed models to produce adjusted ORs for all model variables. Among White adults, all factors from the overall sample remained significant. In contrast, for Black adults, there were many differences between the overall sample. Not being married, wealth, higher BMI, ADLs, and being uninsured were no longer significantly associated with experiencing discrimination in healthcare settings. Unemployment emerged as a new factor significantly associated with a higher likelihood of experiencing discrimination (OR\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;1.74, CI [1.27\u0026ndash;2.39]). Both Black and White adults had significantly increased odd for reporting discrimination with a history of arthritis, higher education, depressive symptoms, male gender, and more doctor visits when examined separate.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eWhen testing the interaction between age and our covariates, we identified that for White adults there were significant slope differences across increasing age for being uninsured (P\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;0.015), decreasing age while having a higher BMI (P\u0026thinsp;\u0026lt;\u0026thinsp;0.001), and decreasing age with a history of hypertension (P\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;0.044). There were not significant age-based slope differences for Black adults.\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"Discussion","content":"\u003cp\u003eOur study was the first to identify the sociodemographic and clinical characteristics of patients that are associated with reported discrimination over time, measured by age. This study showed that Black adults were significantly more likely to report discrimination in healthcare settings compared to White adults. With increasing age, however, these disparities diminished. Our findings make an important contribution to existing literature by demonstrating the longitudinal dynamics of reported discrimination in healthcare settings in a diverse sample of middle-aged and older U.S. adults. Our analysis also identified several factors that were associated with the likelihood of reporting discrimination in healthcare settings, with worse health status and difficulties in physical functioning emerging as a recurrent theme.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eOur findings suggest that middle-aged adults are more likely to experience discrimination in healthcare environments relative to older adults. Moreover, we found that the racial disparity in reported discrimination is most pronounced in those at younger ages (i.e., middle adulthood). These findings generally align with previous research highlighting the prevalence of race-based and socioeconomic status-based discrimination among younger adults.\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR40\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e40\u003c/span\u003e,\u003cspan citationid=\"CR41\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e41\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e The reasons for this are not entirely clear. For example, it is possible that the observed differences across age reflect potential cohort differences\u0026mdash;given the U.S. historical context where older Black adults have lived through periods of legal segregation and the direct consequences of this unequal treatment.\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR42\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e42\u003c/span\u003e,\u003cspan citationid=\"CR43\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e43\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e Additional research is needed to better understand the factors contributing to these patterns.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eWhen considering sociodemographic, and clinical factors collectively, White and Black adults both showed a similar pattern of associations with regard to male gender, higher educational attainment, and adverse health-related status (e.g., history of arthritis and depressive symptoms) being associated with a greater likelihood of reporting discrimination. Despite these significant factors shared by Black and White adults, there were a few differences, as well. In particular, difficulty with ADLs was incrementally associated with experiencing discrimination in a healthcare setting for White adults, but not for Black adults. Previous studies using HRS data have also linked discrimination in healthcare settings to disability and worsening functional limitations.\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR44\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e44\u003c/span\u003e,\u003cspan citationid=\"CR45\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e45\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e Also notably, our analysis also suggests that increased frequency of doctor visits was associated with higher likelihood of experiencing perceived discrimination. Prior research has demonstrated a link between higher physician interaction, reported discrimination, and increased likelihood to delay care. \u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR44\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e44\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003eTaken together, it is important to further disentangle the temporal order of whether discrimination leads to a decreased desire to see physicians and/or if more doctor visits increase the risk of experiencing discrimination.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eA previous study has examined racial differences in health-related discrimination experiences, linking discrimination in healthcare to elevated cardiovascular biomarkers and including race and ethnicity as covariates.\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR46\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e46\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e Our research, however, stratifies by race, providing a detailed analysis of how these associations manifest across different racial groups. Among White adults, lower wealth, being uninsured, and being unmarried were associated with experiencing discrimination in healthcare settings. Conversely, among Black adults, unemployment, was a factor associated with experiencing discrimination in healthcare settings. Older adults who are unemployed (but not retired) may face unique challenges, such as limited access to healthcare resources. Consequently, if these individuals disproportionately report experiencing discrimination, this finding is particularly concerning and warrants attention.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eRacial inequities exist across a large range of health-related outcomes (e.g., readmissions, hypertension).\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR47\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e47\u003c/span\u003e,\u003cspan citationid=\"CR48\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e48\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e However, these inequities are not a random occurrence: structural racism has been widely acknowledged as a driver of inequities, in that it has a long history in the United States that has built in, fostered and normalized discrimination across multiple institutions (e.g., healthcare, employment) and continues to do so in present day.\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR49\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e49\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e Moreover, structural racism in conjunction with interpersonal discrimination is linked to disproportionately greater health consequences across the life course.\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan additionalcitationids=\"CR51\" citationid=\"CR50\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e50\u003c/span\u003e\u0026ndash;\u003cspan citationid=\"CR52\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e52\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eSome limitations should be considered when interpreting our results. First, the racial categories available for analysis were limited. Future research should broaden the racial categories beyond those used here to enrich our understanding of discrimination across different groups. Second, although our measure of discrimination was informative because it is attributed to a specific location, we could not determine the reasons why an individual felt discriminated against (e.g., age, weight, race, socioeconomic status) because it is not distinguishable among the individual items of the EDS. Other studies have identified common patterns for reports of discrimination across multiple settings, and identifying any differences in discrimination in healthcare would be an important addition to our findings.\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR53\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e53\u003c/span\u003e,\u003cspan citationid=\"CR54\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e54\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e This measure also was utilized as a dichotomous variable, opposed to an ordinal one which can capture variation in severity of discrimination experiences. Third, health status and clinical comorbidities were ascertained with self-reported measures that were not adjudicated. Interestingly, past research has shown that Black adults reporting racial discrimination tend to exhibit higher initial cognitive function; whereas White adults tend to have lower cognitive function.\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR55\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e55\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e Future studies with electronic health records or more frequent patient-reported outcomes could reduce potential recall bias, enhance clinical diagnosis accuracy, and allow for an overall more robust analysis of the association between discrimination and health status. Concerns surrounding accuracy and meaning of self-reported measures should also be considered for perceived discrimination. For example, individuals might face explicit mistreatment (e.g. care that does not align with clinical guidelines), but they are unaware of this mistreatment. Educational attainment has previously been connected to a higher likelihood of experiencing discrimination in general settings.\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR10\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e10\u003c/span\u003e,\u003cspan citationid=\"CR56\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e56\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e Our study identifies that more educated populations also experience more discrimination in healthcare settings, as well. This is important in the context that either people who are more highly educated are either experiencing more discrimination, or, potentially, that individuals with less education are less aware of discrimination. Perceptions of discrimination should be analyzed with more refined clinical context to understand how those experiences align with the treatment that the patient has received, in order to understand the most appropriate corrective action to achieve better quality care. Finally, future studies with shorter intervals between consecutive surveys capturing reported discrimination, more detailed measures of discrimination, and a wider array of social determinants of health (\u003cem\u003ee.g.\u003c/em\u003e, access to healthcare services and social support) could also yield valuable insights into the multifaceted influences on healthcare discrimination. Addressing these gaps can better inform targeted interventions (e.g. anti-bias training in medical education) and policies to improve healthcare equity across all demographics.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eDiscrimination in healthcare is a detrimental experience that providers, and healthcare researchers can address though trainings in: allyship, bias literacy, and emotional regulation.\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR57\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e57\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e Our research illuminates the association of discrimination in healthcare settings with multiple facets of an individual's lived experience. The sociodemographic and clinical factors identified in this work provide much-needed insight into patient-level characteristics that likely have significance in clinical settings which could be important to consider when constructing a plan for combating discrimination in healthcare and analyzing the adverse impact it will have on population health. This study provides an important first step to help address discrimination in healthcare settings and promote equitable care for all individuals.\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"Declarations","content":"\u003ch2\u003e\u003cspan class=\"Underline\"\u003eConflicts of Interest\u003c/span\u003e:\u003c/h2\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eN/A\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e \u003cspan class=\"Underline\"\u003eDisclosures\u003c/span\u003e:\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe research was supported by a National Institute on Aging (NIA) grant (R01AG069938), a NIA Diversity Supplement Award (R01AG069938-02S1), and a NIA Predoctoral Fellowship Award (F99AG088695). Dr. Thorpe was supported by P30AG059298, K02AG059140, and U54MD000214.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003ch2\u003eAcknowledgements:\u003c/h2\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eLauren Nichols from the Center for Data and Visualization Sciences at Duke University greatly assisted Michael Green with design elements for the forest plots and is appreciated!\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"References","content":"\u003col\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eWashington A, Randall J (2023) We're Not Taken Seriously: Describing the Experiences of Perceived Discrimination in Medical Settings for Black Women. J Racial Ethn Health Disparities Apr 10(2):883\u0026ndash;891. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.1007/s40615-022-01276-9\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1007/s40615-022-01276-9\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eMateo CM, Williams DR (2020) Addressing Bias and Reducing Discrimination: The Professional Responsibility of Health Care Providers. Acad Med. ;95(12S)\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eWilliams DR, Lawrence JA, Davis BA, Vu C (2019) Understanding how discrimination can affect health. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6773.13222\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1111/1475-6773.13222\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e. \u003cem\u003eHealth Services Research\u003c/em\u003e. /12/01 2019;54(S2):1374\u0026ndash;1388. doi:10.1111/1475-6773.13222\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eNong P, Williamson A, Anthony D, Platt J, Kardia S (2022) Discrimination, trust, and withholding information from providers: Implications for missing data and inequity. SSM Popul Health Jun 18:101092. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.1016/j.ssmph.2022.101092\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1016/j.ssmph.2022.101092\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eSaif-Ur-Rahman KM, Mamun R, Eriksson E, He Y, Hirakawa Y (2021) Discrimination against the elderly in health-care services: a systematic review. \u003cem\u003ePsychogeriatrics\u003c/em\u003e. /05/01 2021;21(3):418\u0026ndash;429. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.1111/psyg.12670\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1111/psyg.12670\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003ePowell W, Richmond J, Mohottige D, Yen I, Joslyn A, Corbie-Smith G (2019) Medical Mistrust, Racism, and Delays in Preventive Health Screening Among African-American Men. \u003cem\u003eBehavioral Medicine\u003c/em\u003e. /04/03 2019;45(2):102\u0026ndash;117. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.1080/08964289.2019.1585327\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1080/08964289.2019.1585327\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eGee GC, Walsemann KM, Brondolo E (2012) A life course perspective on how racism may be related to health inequities. Am J Public Health May 102(5):967\u0026ndash;974. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.2105/ajph.2012.300666\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.2105/ajph.2012.300666\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eRicks TN, Abbyad C, Polinard E (2022) Undoing Racism and Mitigating Bias Among Healthcare Professionals: Lessons Learned During a Systematic Review. J Racial Ethnic Health Disparities 10(5):1990\u0026ndash;2000. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.1007/s40615-021-01137-x\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1007/s40615-021-01137-x\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e. /01 2022\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eNong P, Raj M, Creary M, Kardia SLR, Platt JE (2020) Patient-Reported Experiences of Discrimination in the US Health Care System. JAMA Netw Open 3(12):e2029650\u0026ndash;e2029650. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.29650\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.29650\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eGaston SA, Forde AT, Green M, Sandler DP, Jackson CL (2023) Racial and Ethnic Discrimination and Hypertension by Educational Attainment Among a Cohort of US Women. JAMA Netw Open Nov 1(11):e2344707. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.44707\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.44707\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eOkoro ON, Hillman LA, Cernasev A (2020) We get double slammed! Healthcare experiences of perceived discrimination among low-income African-American women. Women's Health 16:1745506520953348. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.1177/1745506520953348\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1177/1745506520953348\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eEvans-Lacko S, Clement S, Corker E et al (2015) How much does mental health discrimination cost: valuing experienced discrimination in relation to healthcare care costs and community participation. Epidemiol Psychiatric Sci 24(5):423\u0026ndash;434. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.1017/S2045796014000377\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1017/S2045796014000377\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eLippert-Rasmussen K (2023) Cost-Effectiveness and the Avoidance of Discrimination in Healthcare: Can We Have Both? Camb Q Healthc Ethics 32(2):202\u0026ndash;215. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.1017/S096318012200024X\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1017/S096318012200024X\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eSharac J, McCrone P, Clement S, Thornicroft G (2010) The economic impact of mental health stigma and discrimination: A systematic review. Epidemiol Psichiatr Soc 19(3):223\u0026ndash;232. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.1017/S1121189X00001159\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1017/S1121189X00001159\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eHoman P, Brown TH, King B (2021) Structural Intersectionality as a New Direction for Health Disparities Research. J Health Soc Behav 62(3):350\u0026ndash;370. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.1177/00221465211032947\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1177/00221465211032947\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eInstitute of Medicine Committee on U, Eliminating R (2003) Ethnic Disparities in Health C. In: Smedley BD, Stith AY, Nelson AR, eds. \u003cem\u003eUnequal Treatment: Confronting Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Health Care\u003c/em\u003e. National Academies Press (US) Copyright 2002 by the National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eWang VH, Cuevas AG, Osokpo OH et al (2024) Discrimination in Medical Settings across Populations: Evidence From the All of Us Research Program. Am J Prev Med Oct 67(4):568\u0026ndash;580. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.1016/j.amepre.2024.05.018\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1016/j.amepre.2024.05.018\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eBohren JA, Imas A, Rosenberg M (2019) The Dynamics of Discrimination: Theory and Evidence. Am Econ Rev 109(10):3395\u0026ndash;3436. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.1257/aer.20171829\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1257/aer.20171829\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eMoscoso-Porras MG, Alvarado GF (2018) Association between perceived discrimination and healthcare\u0026ndash;seeking behavior in people with a disability. \u003cem\u003eDisability and Health Journal\u003c/em\u003e. \u003cdiv class=\"ExternalRefDOI\"\u003e/01/01/\u003c/div\u003e 2018;11(1):93\u0026ndash;98. doi:10.1016/j.dhjo.2017.04.002\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eBenjamins MR, Whitman S (2014) Relationships between discrimination in health care and health care outcomes among four race/ethnic groups. \u003cem\u003eJournal of Behavioral Medicine\u003c/em\u003e. \u003cdiv class=\"ExternalRefDOI\"\u003e/06/01\u003c/div\u003e 2014;37(3):402\u0026ndash;413. doi:10.1007/s10865-013-9496-7\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eVegda K, Nie JX, Wang L, Tracy CS, Moineddin R, Upshur REG (2009) Trends in health services utilization, medication use, and health conditions among older adults: a 2-year retrospective chart review in a primary care practice. \u003cem\u003eBMC Health Services Research\u003c/em\u003e. /11/30 2009;9(1):217. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.1186/1472-6963-9-217\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1186/1472-6963-9-217\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eHerd P, Robert SA, House JS (2011) Health disparities among older adults: Life course influences and policy solutions. Handbook of aging and the social sciences. Elsevier, pp 121\u0026ndash;134\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eThrasher AD, Clay OJ, Ford CL, Stewart AL (2012) Theory-Guided Selection of Discrimination Measures for Racial/ Ethnic Health Disparities Research Among Older Adults. J Aging Health 24(6):1018\u0026ndash;1043. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.1177/0898264312440322\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1177/0898264312440322\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eGee GC, Walsemann KM, Brondolo E (2012) A Life Course Perspective on How Racism May Be Related to Health Inequities. Am J Public Health 102(5):967\u0026ndash;974. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.2105/ajph.2012.300666\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.2105/ajph.2012.300666\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eClark R, Anderson NB, Clark VR, Williams DR (1999) Racism as a stressor for African Americans: A biopsychosocial model. Am Psychol 54(10):805\u0026ndash;816. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.1037/0003-066X.54.10.805\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1037/0003-066X.54.10.805\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eForde AT, Crookes DM, Suglia SF, Demmer RT (2019) The weathering hypothesis as an explanation for racial disparities in health: a systematic review. \u003cem\u003eAnnals of Epidemiology\u003c/em\u003e. \u003cdiv class=\"ExternalRefDOI\"\u003e/05/01/\u003c/div\u003e 2019;33:1\u0026ndash;18.e3. doi:10.1016/j.annepidem.2019.02.011\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eArmstrong K, Putt M, Halbert CH et al (2013) Prior Experiences of Racial Discrimination and Racial Differences in Health Care System Distrust. Med Care 51(2):144\u0026ndash;150. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.1097/MLR.0b013e31827310a1\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1097/MLR.0b013e31827310a1\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eFarrell TW, Hung WW, Unroe KT et al (2022) Exploring the intersection of structural racism and ageism in healthcare. J Am Geriatr Soc 70(12):3366\u0026ndash;3377. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.1111/jgs.18105\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1111/jgs.18105\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eShippee TP, Fabius CD, Fashaw-Walters S et al (2022) Evidence for Action: Addressing Systemic Racism Across Long-Term Services and Supports. \u003cem\u003eJournal of the American Medical Directors Association\u003c/em\u003e. \u003cdiv class=\"ExternalRefDOI\"\u003e/02/01\u003c/div\u003e/ 2022;23(2):214\u0026ndash;219. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamda.2021.12.018\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eBrown TH, Lee HE, Hicken MT, Bonilla-Silva E, Homan P (2025) Conceptualizing and Measuring Systemic Racism. \u003cem\u003eAnnual Review of Public Health\u003c/em\u003e. ;46(Volume 46, 2025):69\u0026ndash;90. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.1146/annurev-publhealth-060222-032022\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1146/annurev-publhealth-060222-032022\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eHealth and Retirement Study. RAND HRS Longitudinal File (V1) (2020) Fat File (E2A), RAND HRS 2018 Fat File (V2B), RAND HRS 2016 Fat File (V2C), RAND HRS 2014 Fat File (V2B), RAND HRS 2012 Fat File (V3A), RAND HRS 2010 Fat File (V6A), RAND HRS 2008 Fat File (V3A)\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eHealth and Retirement Study (HRS) A Longitudinal Study of Health, Retirement, and Aging. Sponsored by the National Institute on Aging. Accessed 4/17/2022. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttp://hrsonline.isr.umich.edu/\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"http://hrsonline.isr.umich.edu/\" targettype=\"URL\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eCrimmins E, Faul J, Kim JK et al (2013) Documentation of biomarkers in the 2006 and 2008 Health and Retirement Study. \u003cem\u003eAnn Arbor, MI: Survey Research Center University of Michigan\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eCrimmins E, Guyer H, Langa K, Ofstedal MB, Wallace R, Weir D (2008) Documentation of physical measures, anthropometrics and blood pressure in the Health and Retirement Study. HRS Doc Rep DR-011 14(1\u0026ndash;2):47\u0026ndash;59\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eWilliams DR, Yu Y, Jackson JS, Anderson NB (1997) Racial differences in physical and mental health: Socio-economic status, stress and discrimination. J Health Psychol 2(3):335\u0026ndash;351\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eNguyen TT, Vable AM, Glymour MM, Nuru-Jeter A (Mar 2018) Trends for Reported Discrimination in Health Care in a National Sample of Older Adults with Chronic Conditions. J Gen Intern Med 33(3):291\u0026ndash;297. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.1007/s11606-017-4209-5\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1007/s11606-017-4209-5\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eFonda S, Herzog R (2004) \u003cem\u003eDocumentation of physical functioning measured in the Health and Retirement Study and the Asset and Health Dynamics among the Oldest Old Study\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eFarmer HR, Ambroise AZ, Green MD, Dupre ME (2024) Everyday discrimination and age-related trajectories of blood pressure among Black and White middle-aged and older adults. Stigma Health 9(4):471\u0026ndash;481. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.1037/sah0000524\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1037/sah0000524\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eShaw BA, Liang J (2012) Growth models with multilevel regression. Longitudinal data analysis: A practical guide for researchers in aging, health, and social sciences. Routledge/Taylor \u0026amp; Francis Group, pp 217\u0026ndash;242\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eBird ST, Bogart LM (2001) Perceived race-based and socioeconomic status(SES)-based discrimination in interactions with health care providers. Ethn Dis Autumn 11(3):554\u0026ndash;563\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eEverson-Rose SA, Lutsey PL, Roetker NS et al (2015) Perceived Discrimination and Incident Cardiovascular Events: The Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis. Am J Epidemiol 182(3):225\u0026ndash;234. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.1093/aje/kwv035\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1093/aje/kwv035\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eKrieger N, Embodying Inequality (1999) A Review of Concepts, Measures, and Methods for Studying Health Consequences of Discrimination. \u003cem\u003eInternational Journal of Health Services\u003c/em\u003e. /04/01 1999;29(2):295\u0026ndash;352. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.2190/M11W-VWXE-KQM9-G97Q\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.2190/M11W-VWXE-KQM9-G97Q\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eInstitute of Medicine (2003) Unequal Treatment: Confronting Racial and Ethnic Disarities in Health Care. National Academies\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eBenjamins MR, Middleton M (2019) Perceived discrimination in medical settings and perceived quality of care: A population-based study in Chicago. PLoS ONE 14(4):e0215976. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.1371/journal.pone.0215976\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1371/journal.pone.0215976\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eRogers SE, Thrasher AD, Miao Y, Boscardin WJ, Smith AK Discrimination in Healthcare Settings is Associated with Disability in Older Adults: Health and Retirement Study, 2008\u0026ndash;2012. J Gen Intern Med. 2015/10/01 2015;30(10):1413\u0026ndash;1420. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.1007/s11606-015-3233-6\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1007/s11606-015-3233-6\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eNguyen TT, Vable AM, Maria Glymour M, Allen AM (2019) Discrimination in health care and biomarkers of cardiometabolic risk in U.S. adults. SSM - Popul Health 2019/04/01:7:100306. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.1016/j.ssmph.2018.10.006\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1016/j.ssmph.2018.10.006\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eFarmer HR, Xu H, Granger BB, Thomas KL, Dupre ME (2022) Factors associated with racial differences in all-cause 30-day readmission in adults with cardiovascular disease: an observational study of a large healthcare system. BMJ Open 12(11):e051661. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.1136/bmjopen-2021-051661\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1136/bmjopen-2021-051661\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eKrieger N (1990) Racial and gender discrimination: Risk factors for high blood pressure? \u003cem\u003eSocial Science \u0026amp; Medicine\u003c/em\u003e. /\u003cdiv class=\"ExternalRefDOI\"\u003e01/01\u003c/div\u003e/ 1990;30(12):1273\u0026ndash;1281. doi:10.1016/0277-9536(90)90307-E\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eBailey ZD, Krieger N, Ag\u0026eacute;nor M, Graves J, Linos N, Bassett MT (2017) Structural racism and health inequities in the USA: evidence and interventions. Lancet 389(10077):1453\u0026ndash;1463. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.1016/S0140-6736(17)30569-X\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1016/S0140-6736(17)30569-X\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eCarlos RC, Obeng-Gyasi S, Cole SW et al (2022) Linking Structural Racism and Discrimination and Breast Cancer Outcomes: A Social Genomics Approach. J Clin Oncol May 1(13):1407\u0026ndash;1413. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.1200/jco.21.02004\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1200/jco.21.02004\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eChurchwell K, Elkind MSV, Benjamin RM et al (2020) Call to Action: Structural Racism as a Fundamental Driver of Health Disparities: A Presidential Advisory From the American Heart Association. Circulation 142(24):e454\u0026ndash;e468. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.1161/CIR.0000000000000936\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1161/CIR.0000000000000936\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eBrown TH, Homan P (2024) Structural Racism and Health Stratification: Connecting Theory to Measurement. J Health Soc Behav 65(1):141\u0026ndash;160. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.1177/00221465231222924\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1177/00221465231222924\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eCobb RJ, Rodriguez VJ, Brown TH et al (2023) Attribution for everyday discrimination typologies and mortality risk among older black adults: Evidence from the health and retirement study. Soc Sci Med 316:115166 2023/01/01/. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.1016/j.socscimed.2022.115166\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1016/j.socscimed.2022.115166\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eErving CL, Cobb RJ, Sheehan C (2022) Attributions for Everyday Discrimination and All-Cause Mortality Risk Among Older Black Women: A Latent Class Analysis Approach. Gerontologist 63(5):887\u0026ndash;899. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.1093/geront/gnac080\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1093/geront/gnac080\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eFerraro KF, Zaborenko CJ (2023) Race, everyday discrimination, and cognitive function in later life. PLoS ONE 18(10):e0292617. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.1371/journal.pone.0292617\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1371/journal.pone.0292617\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eAssari S (2020) Social Epidemiology of Perceived Discrimination in the United States: Role of Race, Educational Attainment, and Income. \u003cem\u003eInt J Epidemiol Res\u003c/em\u003e. /7/1 2020;7(3):136\u0026ndash;141. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.34172/ijer.2020.24\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.34172/ijer.2020.24\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eVela MB, Erondu AI, Smith NA, Peek ME, Woodruff JN, Chin MH (2022) Eliminating Explicit and Implicit Biases in Health Care: Evidence and Research Needs. \u003cem\u003eAnnual Review of Public Health\u003c/em\u003e. ;43(Volume 43, 2022):477\u0026ndash;501. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.1146/annurev-publhealth-052620-103528\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1146/annurev-publhealth-052620-103528\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003c/ol\u003e"}],"fulltextSource":"","fullText":"","funders":[{"identity":"c64fc8be-bed5-47f9-8377-4fbc50642655","identifier":"10.13039/100000049","name":"National Institute on Aging","awardNumber":"R01AG069938","order_by":0},{"identity":"7e1bedc7-1451-4837-965d-aa0e1097b68b","identifier":"10.13039/100000049","name":"National Institute on Aging","awardNumber":"R01AG069938-02S1","order_by":1},{"identity":"b051e5bd-eec4-4164-8ae8-f0e1cdd0f836","identifier":"10.13039/100000049","name":"National Institute on Aging","awardNumber":"F99AG088695","order_by":2}],"hasAdminPriorityOnWorkflow":false,"hasManuscriptDocX":true,"hasOptedInToPreprint":true,"hasPassedJournalQc":"","hasAnyPriority":true,"hideJournal":false,"highlight":"","institution":"Duke University School of Medicine","isAcceptedByJournal":true,"isAuthorSuppliedPdf":false,"isDeskRejected":"","isHiddenFromSearch":false,"isInQc":false,"isInWorkflow":false,"isPdf":false,"isPdfUpToDate":true,"isWithdrawnOrRetracted":false,"journal":{"display":true,"email":"
[email protected]","identity":"researchsquare","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":true,"externalIdentity":"","sideBox":"","snPcode":"","submissionUrl":"/submission","title":"Research Square","twitterHandle":"researchsquare","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":false,"editorialSystem":"","reportingPortfolio":"","inReviewEnabled":false,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":true},"keywords":"Perceived Discrimination, Healthcare Discrimination, Aging, Racial Disparities, Health Equity, Healthcare Services, Quality Improvement","lastPublishedDoi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-6507515/v1","lastPublishedDoiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-6507515/v1","license":{"name":"CC BY 4.0","url":"https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"},"manuscriptAbstract":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eBackground: \u003c/strong\u003eDiscrimination in healthcare settings impedes quality care, leading to poorer health outcomes.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eObjective: \u003c/strong\u003eTo examine racial differences in perceived discrimination in healthcare settings across age among middle-aged and older adults and identify factors associated with these experiences.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eDesign: \u003c/strong\u003eLongitudinal cohort data from the Health and Retirement Study collected between 2008 and 2020.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eParticipants\u003c/strong\u003e: The sample included 17,478 United States adults aged 50 and older who had at least one doctor visit or hospitalization in the prior two years.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eMain Measures: \u003c/strong\u003eSelf-reported perceived discrimination in healthcare settings, measured using an item from the Everyday Discrimination Scale and categorized as \"never\" versus \"ever\" experienced discrimination. Generalized linear mixed models were used to identify factors associated with experiencing discrimination. Assessed factors included sociodemographic (age, gender, marital status, education, wealth, insurance status, employment) and clinical characteristics (depressive symptoms, difficulty with activities of daily living [ADLs], number of doctor visits, hospitalizations, body mass index [BMI], and comorbidities).\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eResults: \u003c/strong\u003eBlack adults were significantly more likely to experience discrimination in healthcare settings than White adults, and these disparities were most pronounced at younger ages. Factors associated with higher odds of reporting discrimination included Black race, male gender, not being married, being uninsured, higher educational attainment, depressive symptoms, difficulty with ADLs, history of arthritis, and higher BMI.\u003cstrong\u003e \u003c/strong\u003eIn race-stratified analyses, unemployment was associated with higher odds of reporting discrimination among Black adults. Among White adults, being unmarried and uninsured were significant factors associated with discrimination.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eConclusions and Relevance: \u003c/strong\u003eBlack adults reported higher rates of perceived discrimination in healthcare settings than White adults, especially during middle adulthood. Multiple sociodemographic and clinical factors were associated with these experiences. These findings underscore the need to address discrimination in healthcare to improve patient-provider relationships among middle-aged and older adults.\u003c/p\u003e","manuscriptTitle":"Factors Associated with Perceived Discrimination in Healthcare Among Middle-Aged and Older Adults","msid":"","msnumber":"","nonDraftVersions":[{"code":1,"date":"2025-05-02 17:55:46","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-6507515/v1","editorialEvents":[{"type":"communityComments","content":0}],"status":"published","journal":{"display":true,"email":"
[email protected]","identity":"researchsquare","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":true,"externalIdentity":"","sideBox":"","snPcode":"","submissionUrl":"/submission","title":"Research Square","twitterHandle":"researchsquare","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":false,"editorialSystem":"","reportingPortfolio":"","inReviewEnabled":false,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":true}}],"origin":"","ownerIdentity":"9f3a730e-cc37-455b-bd0e-9c01420da515","owner":[],"postedDate":"May 2nd, 2025","published":true,"recentEditorialEvents":[],"rejectedJournal":[],"revision":"","amendment":"","status":"published-in-journal","subjectAreas":[{"id":47535153,"name":"Epidemiology"}],"tags":[],"updatedAt":"2025-08-06T13:23:51+00:00","versionOfRecord":{"articleIdentity":"rs-6507515","link":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-025-09796-w","journal":{"identity":"journal-of-general-internal-medicine","isVorOnly":false,"title":"Journal of General Internal Medicine"},"publishedOn":"2025-08-05 00:00:00","publishedOnDateReadable":"August 5th, 2025"},"versionCreatedAt":"2025-05-02 17:55:46","video":"","vorDoi":"10.1007/s11606-025-09796-w","vorDoiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-025-09796-w","workflowStages":[]},"version":"v1","identity":"rs-6507515","journalConfig":"researchsquare"},"__N_SSP":true},"page":"/article/[identity]/[[...version]]","query":{"redirect":"/article/rs-6507515","identity":"rs-6507515","version":["v1"]},"buildId":"8U1c8b4HqxoKbykW_rLl7","isFallback":false,"isExperimentalCompile":false,"dynamicIds":[84888],"gssp":true,"scriptLoader":[]}
Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below.
Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure
cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can
have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy
(via DOI)
is the canonical version.