Genome-wide expression analysis of endometrium before and after endometrioma surgery

Other OA: closed CC-BY-NC-ND-4.0
⚙ AI-generated summary by qwen3.7-flash, 2026-08-23 ⓘ

Genome-wide expression profiling of eutopic endometrium in women with ovarian endometrioma revealed that laparoscopic cystectomy significantly altered the expression of genes associated with implantation and immune functions compared to controls.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

⚙ AI-generated deep summary by qwen3.7-flash, 2026-10-19 · read from full text ⓘ

This study performed genome-wide expression analysis on endometrial tissue samples collected from patients before and after surgical removal of endometriomas. The researchers aimed to identify molecular changes in the eutopic endometrium associated with the resolution of ovarian endometriotic cysts. While specific differential gene lists are not detailed in the provided abstract, the methodology focuses on transcriptomic shifts following surgical intervention for this condition. This paper is centrally about endometriosis — specifically examining the molecular profile of the endometrium in the context of endometrioma surgery.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This study was planned to investigate possible alteration in the number of differentially expressed genes (DEGs) in eutopic endometrium before and after laparoscopic removal of the ovarian endometrioma. STUDY DESIGN: Six infertile women with ovarian endometrioma who underwent laparoscopic endometrioma cystectomy and six fertile control subjects who underwent tubal sterilization were included the study. Endometrial samples were collected before and 3 months after surgery throughout the mid-luteal phase. Genome-wide expression profiling was performed with Illumina Human HT-12V4 microchip, a high density silica bead-based microarray which utilizing more than 47.000 probs. Illumina microsequence system was used to assess detection of p value for each probe in every sample. Probes revealing significant assessment (p < .05) were selected for comparative analysis. RESULTS: We have detected 1478 DEGs in the comparison between endometrium of women with endometrioma and fertile controls. 118 out of 1478 genes (7.9 %) were significantly increased or decreased more than 1.5-fold in their expression. When the preoperative values of the control and patient groups are compared the number of DEGs was 243 (7.5 %). In 9 out of 243 genes, the fold change was found to be 1.5 and more (3.7 %). Comparison of the number of DEGs after endometrioma surgery and tubal ligation revealed that expression patterns of 1036 genes (33.7 %) were changed in endometrioma group. In 105 out of 1036 genes, the fold change was found to be 1.5 and above (10 %). A comparison using 2706 probes revealed changes in the expression patterns of 106 different genes (3.9 %) after endometrioma resection. In 4 out of 106 genes, the fold change was found to be 1.5 and above (3.7 %). The comparison using 6035 probes revealed changes in the expression patterns of 93 genes (1.5 %) after tubal ligation. None of the 93 genes had a fold change of 1.5 or higher. The number of DEGs in endometrioma groups after surgery was approximately 3-fold higher than control group. CONCLUSIONS: Endometrium of women with endometrioma displayed abnormal expression of genes associated with implantation, immunological, endocrine and neuracrine functions. Positive alteration of the expression pattern of DEGs and signal transduction pathways following endometrioma surgery can improve the receptive capacity and implantation rates of eutopic endometrium.
Full text 509 characters · extracted from oa-html · click to expand
Genome-wide expression analysis of endometrium before and after endometrioma surgery Loading... Date Journal Title Journal ISSN Volume Title Publisher Elsevier Access Rights info:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess DOI 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2020.08.036 Abstract Description Journal or Series European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology WoS Q Value Scopus Q Value Volume 253 Issue Citation Endorsement Review Supplemented By Referenced By Rights and licensing info:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

⚙ Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-html ⓘ

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Condition tags

endometriosisendometrioma

MeSH descriptors

Endometriosis Endometriosis Endometriosis Endometriosis Infertility, Female Infertility, Female Embryo Implantation Embryo Implantation Endometrium Endometrium Endometrium Female Female Humans Humans Luteal Phase Luteal Phase

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-10-18T09:30:06.152893+00:00
pubmed
last seen: 2026-10-08T21:28:22.610273+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-10-17T06:24:38.187582+00:00
License: CC-BY-NC-ND-4.0 · commercial use OK · attribution required
Courtesy of the U.S. National Library of Medicine