Abstract
Endometriosis is one of the most controversial diseases in contemporary medicine. This especially concerns ovarian endometriosis. With the introduction of new World Health Organization (WHO) classifications, both clinical (ICD-11) and pathological, adopted in 2020, the classification and terminology of ovarian endometriosis have not been clarified, and many questions have arisen due to fundamental contradictions within one classification and when assessing their compliance. This article discusses aspects of the toxicity of ovarian endometriosis and the impact of cystectomy on the fertility of patients with this pathology. Together, molecular and morphogenetic features allow to substantiate the indications for surgical treatment of ovarian endometriosis, and histo-structural features enable to make the choice in favor of ablative techniques rather than cystectomy. In the conclusion of the article, the problem of choosing hormone therapy is considered. In this regard, data on the resistance of endometrioid tissue to progesterone are presented. Ethinylestradiol can not only neutralize this resistance, but also enhance the anti-proliferative effect of progestogen, as well as accelerate the processes of apoptosis of endometrioid cells.
Full text
1,991 characters
· extracted from
oa-doi-fallback
· click to expand
Deep ovarian endometriosis: controversial and unresolved issues
Aleksandr I. Davydov /
Vladimir M. Pashkov /
Anatoliy I. Ishchenko /
Kamil R. Bakhtiyarov /
Vladimir A. Lebedev /
Raisa A. Chilova /
Yuliana A. Vorotnikova /
Margarita V. Ivantsova /
Endometriosis is one of the most controversial diseases in contemporary medicine. This especially concerns ovarian endometriosis. With the introduction of new World Health Organization (WHO) classifications, both clinical (ICD-11) and pathological, adopted in 2020, the classification and terminology of ovarian endometriosis have not been clarified, and many questions have arisen due to fundamental contradictions within one classification and when assessing their compliance. This article discusses aspects of the toxicity of ovarian endometriosis and the impact of cystectomy on the fertility of patients with this pathology. Together, molecular and morphogenetic features allow to substantiate the indications for surgical treatment of ovarian endometriosis, and histo-structural features enable to make the choice in favor of ablative techniques rather than cystectomy. In the conclusion of the article, the problem of choosing hormone therapy is considered. In this regard, data on the resistance of endometrioid tissue to progesterone are presented. Ethinylestradiol can not only neutralize this resistance, but also enhance the anti-proliferative effect of progestogen, as well as accelerate the processes of apoptosis of endometrioid cells.
Key words: deep ovarian endometriosis, ovarian endometrioma, classification, terminology, toxicity, ablation, progesterone resistance
For citation: Davydov A.I., Pashkov V.M., Ishchenko A.I., Bakhtiyarov K.R., Lebedev V.A., Chilova R.A., Vorotnikova Yu.A., Ivantsova M.V. Deep ovarian endometriosis: controversial and unresolved issues. Vopr. ginekol. akus. perinatol. (Gynecology, Obstetrics and Perinatology). 2024; 23(2): 5–14. (In Russian). DOI: 10.20953/ 1726-1678-2024-2-5-14
Open access
Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below.
Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure
cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can
have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy
(via DOI)
is the canonical version.