Microplastics in human female reproductive samples: evidence and implications for endometriosis

In: 5th International PhD Students’ Conference at the University of Life Sciences in Lublin, Poland: ENVIRONMENT – PLANT – ANIMAL – PRODUCT · 2026 · doi:10.24326/icdsupl5.h020 · W7155802367
OA: closed CC0
Full text JSON View on OpenAlex View at publisher
⚙ AI-generated summary by gemini-2.5-flash-lite+body, 2026-06-08 ⓘ

This review summarizes human evidence for microplastics in female reproductive samples and their potential relevance to endometriosis pathophysiology, finding microplastics in urine, endometrium, and ovarian follicular fluid.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

⚙ AI-generated deep summary by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-08 · read from full text ⓘ

This paper is a structured review of human evidence on microplastics in female reproductive samples, using a PRISMA-guided literature search across Google Scholar, PubMed, and Scopus, ultimately including 12 original human studies. It reports biomonitoring evidence of microplastics in urine from women with endometriosis, while noting that no clear disease-specific difference in urinary burden has yet been established, and it summarizes direct tissue findings where microplastics have been detected in human endometrium and in selected pathological gynecologic tissues including adenomyosis, ovarian ectopic cysts, and uterine fibroids. Frequently detected polymer types included polyethylene and polypropylene, and some reports suggested differences between pathological and non-pathological tissues, though overall evidence remains limited. This paper centrally about endometriosis — it focuses on synthesizing microplastics findings in reproductive samples with implications for endometriosis pathophysiology, including inflammation, oxidative stress, endocrine signaling, and immune dysregulation.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Full text 3,970 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · 2 sections · click to expand

Abstract

number: H020 DOI: https://doi.org/10.24326/ICDSUPL5.H020 Published online: 22 April 2026 Microplastics in human female reproductive samples: evidence and implications for endometriosis Katarzyna Warchoł*1, Anna Stępniewska2, Marcello Ceccaroni2, Agnieszka Kuźniar1, Piotr Olcha3 and Łukasz Nowakowski3 1 Laboratory of Genomics and Genetics, Faculty of Medicine, The John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin, 1H Konstantynów St., 20-708 Lublin, Poland 2 Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Gynecology Oncology and Minimally-Invasive Pelvic Surgery, International School of Surgical Anatomy (ISSA), IRCCS Ospedale Sacro Cuore – Don Calabria, Via Don A. Sempreboni 5, 37024 Negrar, Verona, Italy 3 Department of Gynaecology and Gynaecological Endocrinology, Medical University of Lublin, 23 Racławickie Ave., 20-049 Lublin, Poland * Corresponding author: [email protected] In recent years, microplastics have emerged as a novel class of environmental contaminants with potential relevance to women’s reproductive health. Human evidence in this field remains limited, but recent studies have demonstrated the presence of microplastics in selected biologically relevant female reproductive samples, including urine, endometrium, pathological gynaecological tissues and human ovarian follicular fluid. The aim of this review was to summarise the currently available human evidence on microplastics in female reproductive samples, with a particular focus on findings relevant to endometriosis pathophysiology. A structured literature search was conducted in Google Scholar, PubMed, and Scopus according to PRISMA principles. Of 761 identified records, 752 were screened, 22 full-text articles were assessed for eligibility, and 12 original human studies were included in the final analysis. Available human studies remain scarce. Biomonitoring evidence has demonstrated the presence of microplastics in urine samples collected from women with endometriosis, supporting the concept of internal exposure, although no clear disease-specific difference in urinary burden has yet been established. Direct tissue-related evidence in women includes the detection of microplastics in human endometrium and in selected pathological gynaecological tissues, including adenomyosis, ovarian ectopic cysts and uterine fibroids. In these studies, polyethylene and polypropylene were among the frequently detected polymer types, and some reports suggested differences between pathological and non-pathological tissues, although the available evidence remains limited. Microplastics have also been reported in human ovarian follicular fluid, a biologically relevant microenvironment for oocyte maturation and fertility. The direct evidence from endometriotic lesions themselves remains lacking, currently available human detection studies may be considered biologically relevant to pathways implicated in endometriosis, including inflammation, oxidative stress, endocrine signaling and immune dysregulation. Microplastics and associated chemicals are an emerging concern in reproductive health, and future studies should prioritise tissue-based investigation and advanced analytical approaches to clarify their relevance in endometriosis. Research funded by the Vice Rector for the Collegium Medicum at the Catholic University of Lublin from a research grant.

Keywords

endocrine disruptors; endometriosis; microplastics; reproductive toxicology How to cite Warchoł K., Stępniewska A., Ceccaroni M., Kuźniar A., Olcha P., Nowakowski Ł., 2026. Microplastics in human female reproductive samples: evidence and implications for endometriosis. In: 5th International PhD Students’ Conference at the University of Life Sciences in Lublin, Poland: Environment – Plant – Animal – Product. https://doi.org/10.24326/ICDSUPL5.H020

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

⚙ Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback ⓘ

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Condition tags

endometriosis

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2026) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

openalex
last seen: 2026-07-22T06:07:13.250796+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-10-14T06:23:58.021457+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK