Method
for iPSC generation
Alejandro De Los Angeles1*, Clemens B. Hug2*, Vadim N. Gladyshev3, George M. Church4,5,
Sergiy Velychko4,5*
1McGovern Institute for Brain Research, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge MA, USA
2Laboratory of Systems Pharmacology, Harvard Program in Therapeutic Science, Harvard Medical
School, Boston, MA, USA
3Division of Genetics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital and Harvard Medical
School, Boston, MA, USA
4Department of Genetics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
5Wyss Institute, Harvard University, Boston, MA, USA
*equal contribution as corresponding authors
e-mail:
[email protected];
[email protected];
[email protected]
Abstract
Since the revolutionary discovery of induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) by Shinya Yamanaka, the
comparison between iPSCs and embryonic stem cells (ESCs) has revealed significant differences in their
epigenetic states and developmental potential. A recent compelling study published in Nature by
Buckberry et al. 1 demonstrated that a transient-naive-treatment (TNT) could facilitate epigenetic
reprogramming and improve the developmental potential of human iPSCs (hiPSCs). However, the study
characterized bulk hiPSCs instead of isolating clonal lines and overlooked the persistent expression of
Sendai virus carrying exogenous Yamanaka factors. Our analyses revealed that Sendai genes were
expressed in most control PSC samples, including hESCs, which were not intentionally infected. The
highest levels of Sendai expression were detected in samples continuously treated with naive media,
where it led to overexpression of exogenous MYC, SOX2, and KLF4, altering both the expression levels
and ratios of reprogramming factors. Our findings call for further research to verify the effectiveness of the
TNT method in the context of delivery methods that ensure prompt elimination of exogenous factors,
leading to the generation of bona fide transgene-independent iPSCs.
Detection of Sendai virus sequences in established pluripotent stem cell lines
Our analysis of publicly available RNA-seq data provided by Buckberry et al. revealed significant
expression of Sendai virus genes in nearly all PSC samples (Fig. 1a). The highest levels of Sendai genes
were observed in naive hiPSCs, suggesting a possible selection of cells with persistent viral expression
2,3.
Similar findings were published by Yamanaka and colleagues reporting the persistence of Cytotune 2.0
Sendai viruses in human naive PSCs cultured in t2iLGo conditions 4. One of the two primed hiPSC
samples showed expression of Sendai virus genes as late as passage 17. Traces of Sendai virus were
also found in naive-to-primed (NTP) hiPSCs, which were established and passaged in naive media before
being transferred into primed PSC conditions, whereas TNT hiPSCs were Sendai-free. Surprisingly,
control MEL1 hESC samples from Buckberry et al. also had low but detectable levels of Sendai
expression. In contrast, hESC samples from another group
5 did not express any Sendai genes, as
expected. hESCs were not deliberately infected with Sendai viruses, suggesting a contamination or
possibly a mix-up of hESC and TNT hiPSC samples.
Naive media selects for high levels of exogenous Yamanaka factors
We assessed the levels of Sendai virus sequences in RNA-seq data across human reprogramming
intermediates and established naive and primed hiPSC bulk lines, encompassing Buckberry et al. and
.CC-BY 4.0 International licenseavailable under a
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted March 12, 2024. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.03.07.583804doi: bioRxiv preprint
2
two additional studies by the same group (Liu et al., Nature Methods 2017; and Liu et al., Nature
2020)1,6,7 (Fig. 1b). The analyses confirmed the absence of Sendai virus in control fibroblast samples as
well as expected pronounced expression levels in Day 3 and Day 7 reprogramming samples. For each of
the culture conditions tested (t2iLGoY, 5iLAF, NHSM, RSeT—naive medias, and E8—primed media), the
levels of Sendai viruses decreased with passaging, yet remained detectable even at late passage
numbers. The presence of Sendai virus in control hESCs from Liu et al, 2017 was also noted. Finally, a
nearly 1,000-fold higher level of Sendai expression was observed in t2iLGoY-cultivated hiPSCs relative to
primed hiPSCs at similar high passage numbers, which amounts to approximately two-fold enrichment for
Sendai-expressing cells during each passage in naive media (every 3 days).
A significant presence of Sendai virus sequences in control naive hiPSCs enabled us to evaluate the
expression level of each Yamanaka factor. Endogenous transcripts include both coding sequences (CDS)
and untranslated regions (UTRs), while the Sendai RNA contains only the CDS sequences allowing
discrimination of the endogenous and exogenous RNAs. Examining the RNA-seq read coverage for the
Yamanaka factors revealed a striking difference in expression patterns between naive cells and other
samples: naive samples showed significantly lower UTR expression while maintaining high CDS
coverage, suggesting that most transcripts are derived from loci lacking UTRs ( Fig. 1c). To quantify the
extent of exogenous expression, we evaluated the ratio of reads mapping to CDSs versus UTRs. Our
analysis found higher CDS/UTR ratios for MYC, SOX2, and KLF4 (SKM) in naive hiPSCs compared to
the expected CDS/UTR ratio found in samples with low or absent transgene expression, such as
fibroblasts and hESCs, indicating a selection for exogenous SKM expression in the naive hiPSCs ( Fig.
1d-e). Exogenous MYC was the most enriched, with a CDS/UTR ratio greater than 100, followed by
SOX2 and KLF4 with ratios exceeding 10. Exogenous OCT4, however, was not noticeably enriched,
which likely reflects relatively high levels of endogenous OCT4 expression in primed PSCs.
The resulting overexpression of SKM in reprogramming samples treated with naive media echoes our
studies showing that omitting OCT4 from the Yamanaka cocktail could improve the quality of iPSCs
8 and
reset PSCs across species9, hinting at the possible mechanism underlying TNT reprogramming.
Implications and recommendations for future studies
Prior research emphasized the need for transgene clearance to ensure reactivation of the endogenous
pluripotency network and to avoid issues like abnormal differentiation. Even minimal leakage of
exogenous OSKM from a tet-inducible promoter compromises the developmental potential of iPSCs,
rendering tet-inducible OSKM iPSCs incapable of producing healthy animals
8-9. Our results suggest that
the t2iLGoY naive medium, used in the TNT reprogramming protocol, promotes the retention of
exogenous reprogramming factors and changes their ratios ( Fig. 1e ). This raises concerns about
applications of such media in reprogramming protocols. Yamanaka factors can induce a transient naive-
like state even in primed media
10. Identification of the optimal reprogramming factor ratio could eliminate
the need for the naive medium treatment with its associated risks of genetic and epigenetic instability 11.
Refinements of the Cytotune 2.0 Sendai kit, such as an all-in-one design or the addition of microRNA-
binding sites, might promote efficient virus elimination. Meticulous assessment for exogenous factor
elimination is crucial. Furthermore, we recommend isolating and characterizing clonal iPSC lines rather
than bulk passaging of reprogramming cultures, to reduce heterogeneity and the potential for selection.
Conclusion
The study by Buckberry et al. suggests that a specific naive media regimen can boost the hiPSC
technology. Our finding of Sendai virus sequences in control hiPSC and hESC lines, coupled with naive
media favoring high Sendai expression suggests that further work needs to be done to support the
effectiveness of the TNT reprogramming method, underscoring the necessity for a refined delivery
system.
.CC-BY 4.0 International licenseavailable under a
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted March 12, 2024. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.03.07.583804doi: bioRxiv preprint
3
Fig. 1: Persistence of Sendai virus and selection for exogenous factor expression by naive media.
a, Read coverage of the Sendai virus genome. Two replicates per condition are shown (in red and blue).
Coverage was binned at 100 bp resolution and is shown as counts per million reads (CPM). The F gene
was deleted in the commercial kit used for reprogramming in these studies. b, Time-course of Sendai
expression across reprogramming and hPSC samples. The y-axis shows the mean expression as
transcripts per million (TPM) of all Sendai genes – except for F. Symbols indicate the study from which
samples were sourced and colors indicate the cell culture media that the samples were grown in. The
dashed line at the bottom corresponds to the location of samples with zero TPM. c, Read coverage of
Yamanaka factors. The CPM values are rescaled such that each sample has a range from exactly zero to
one. Large boxes in the gene models indicate exons, small boxes correspond to 5’ and 3’ untranslated
regions (UTRs), and lines with arrows indicate introns. UTRs are highlighted using gray shading. d,
Quantification of the ratio between coding sequence and untranslated region expression (CDS/UTR
ratio). For each Yamanaka factor we quantified the number of reads aligning to CDS and UTR regions.
The ratio of normalized counts CDS/UTR serves as a proxy for the proportion of transcripts originating
from the viral transgene vs the endogenous locus. The horizontal black line is drawn at the mean ratio of
the hESC control samples from Buckberry et al., which serve as baseline for the expected ratio in the
absence of a transgene. The horizontal dashed line is drawn at the location of samples with a ratio of
zero. Samples with low expression below <30 raw counts are drawn in a lighter shade. e, Graphical
overview and mechanism of TNT method: the study utilizes t2iLGoY naive media, which preferentially
selects for cells expressing high levels of exogenous reprogramming factors from Sendai virus RNA
(illustrated in dark red). This selective expression of exogenous factors may significantly contribute to the
outcomes observed in the TNT reprogramming.
.CC-BY 4.0 International licenseavailable under a
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted March 12, 2024. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.03.07.583804doi: bioRxiv preprint
4
Methods
Processing of RNA-seq data
Raw sequencing reads were downloaded from SRA accession numbers SRP286549 (Buckberry et al. 1),
SRP259918 (Liu et al. 2020 7), SRP115256 (Liu et al. 2017 6), SRP059279 (Ji et al. 2016 12), and
SRP068579 (Pastor et al. 20165).
RNA-seq alignment and quantification
Human transcripts were quantified using human genome version GRCh38 and version 110 of the
Ensembl gene annotations. For Sendai virus transcripts we used sequences and gene annotations from
NCBI reference sequence NC_075392.1 ( Respirovirus muris). We quantified transcript expression using
Salmon
13 1.10.2 using the options -l A --seqBias --gcBias --posBias --softclip. The
Salmon index was created by concatenating the CDS fasta file from Ensembl with the Sendai transcripts
obtained from NC_075392.1. The raw transcript counts from Salmon were imported into R 4.3.1 using the
tximport package
14 and aggregated to gene-level counts. For each RNA-seq sample, a library specific
correction factor accounting for differences in sequencing depth was calculated using
estimateSizeFactorsForMatrix() from DESeq215.
Additionally, all reads were aligned to the human genome using STAR 16 2.7.9a with default settings. The
genome index was prepared by concatenating the unmasked primary DNA assembly from Ensembl with
the whole Sendai genome.
Read coverage plots
Read coverage plots for the Sendai genome and Yamanaka factors were generated based on our STAR
alignments using the ggcoverage R package. Reads were counted in evenly spaced 100 bp bins,
normalized using the previously calculated size factors, divided by the mean number of reads per sample,
and then multiplied by a million to get Counts Per Million (CPM). For comparing coverage of coding
sequences (CDS) to 5’ and 3’ untranslated regions (UTR) we rescaled raw CPM values for each sample
so that their minimum and maximum are zero and one, respectively.
Calculation of CDS to UTR ratios
The ratio between expression of CDS to UTRs in naturally occurring mature mRNAs is expected to be
close to one, given how they are usually transcribed and spliced as a single unit. mRNA transcribed from
exogenous viral sequences do not contain UTRs, therefore shifting the CDS/UTR ratio up the more they
are expressed. Read counts for the coding sequences (CDS), as well as 5’ and 3’ untranslated regions
(UTR) for each Yamanaka factor were quantified based on our STAR alignments using the Rsubread
17 R
package. For each of the four factors we picked a representative transcript, annotated as “MANE select”
in Ensembl. These were ENST00000325404, ENST00000259915, ENST00000621592, and
ENST00000374672 for SOX2, POU5F1, MYC, and KLF4, respectively. Raw counts for each feature type
and transcript were added up, normalized using DESeq2 size factors, and divided by the total feature
length. These normalized counts for CDS and UTR for each transcript were then divided by each other to
yield CDS/UTR ratios.
.CC-BY 4.0 International licenseavailable under a
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted March 12, 2024. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.03.07.583804doi: bioRxiv preprint
5
References
1. Buckberry, S. et al. Transient naive reprogramming corrects hiPS cells functionally and
epigenetically. Nature 620, 863–872 (2023).
2. Takashima, Y. et al. Resetting Transcription Factor Control Circuitry toward Ground-State
Pluripotency in Human. Cell 158, 1254–1269 (2014).
3. Guo, G. et al. Naive Pluripotent Stem Cells Derived Directly from Isolated Cells of the Human Inner
Cell Mass. Stem Cell Rep. 6, 437–446 (2016).
4. Kunitomi, A. et al. Improved Sendai viral system for reprogramming to naive pluripotency. Cell Rep.
Methods
2, 100317 (2022).
5. Pastor, W. A. et al. Naive Human Pluripotent Cells Feature a Methylation Landscape Devoid of
Blastocyst or Germline Memory. Cell Stem Cell 18, 323–329 (2016).
6. Liu, X. et al. Comprehensive characterization of distinct states of human naive pluripotency
generated by reprogramming. Nat. Methods 14, 1055–1062 (2017).
7. Liu, X. et al. Reprogramming roadmap reveals route to human induced trophoblast stem cells. Nature
586, 101–107 (2020).
8. Velychko, S. et al. Excluding Oct4 from Yamanaka Cocktail Unleashes the Developmental Potential
of iPSCs. Cell Stem Cell 25, 737-753.e4 (2019).
9. MacCarthy, C. M. et al. Highly cooperative chimeric super-SOX induces naive pluripotency across
species. Cell Stem Cell 31, 127-147.e9 (2024).
10. Cacchiarelli, D. et al. Integrative Analyses of Human Reprogramming Reveal Dynamic Nature of
Induced Pluripotency. Cell 162, 412–424 (2015).
11. Bar, S., Schachter, M., Eldar-Geva, T. & Benvenisty, N. Large-Scale Analysis of Loss of Imprinting in
Human Pluripotent Stem Cells. Cell Rep. 19, 957–968 (2017).
12. Ji, X. et al. 3D Chromosome Regulatory Landscape of Human Pluripotent Cells. Cell Stem Cell 18,
262–275 (2016).
13. Patro, R., Duggal, G., Love, M. I., Irizarry, R. A. & Kingsford, C. Salmon provides fast and bias-aware
quantification of transcript expression. Nat. Methods 14, 417–419 (2017).
14. Soneson, C., Love, M. & Robinson, M. Differential analyses for RNA-seq: transcript-level estimates
i
mprove gene-level inferences [version 2; peer review: 2 approved]. F1000Research 4, (2016).
.CC-BY 4.0 International licenseavailable under a
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted March 12, 2024. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.03.07.583804doi: bioRxiv preprint
6
15. Love, M. I., Huber, W. & Anders, S. Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNA-seq
data with DESeq2. Genome Biol. 15, 1–21 (2014).
16. Dobin, A. et al. STAR: ultrafast universal RNA-seq aligner. Bioinformatics 29, 15–21 (2013).
17. Liao, Y., Smyth, G. K. & Shi, W. The R package Rsubread is easier, faster, cheaper and better for
alignment and quantification of RNA sequencing reads. Nucleic Acids Res. 47, e47 (2019).
Acknowledgements
We thank Caitlin MacCarthy for editing the manuscript. We acknowledge support from the NIA grant R01
AG058063 (C.H.) and NCI U54-CA225088 (C.H.).
Author contributions
S.V. and A.A. conceived the study. A.A. performed initial analysis. C.H. performed an independent full
analysis and generated the figures. A.A., S.V. and C.H. interpreted the results and wrote the manuscript.
V.N.G. and G.M.C. advised on the study.
Competing interests
S.V. is listed as an inventor of a submitted patent on SK/SKM naive reset. All other authors declare no
competing interests.
.CC-BY 4.0 International licenseavailable under a
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted March 12, 2024. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.03.07.583804doi: bioRxiv preprint
.CC-BY 4.0 International licenseavailable under a
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted March 12, 2024. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.03.07.583804doi: bioRxiv preprint
Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below.
Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure
cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can
have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy
(via DOI)
is the canonical version.