Do Carbon Exchanges Make a Difference to Carbon Disclosure and Performance? Evidence from Indonesia

preprint OA: closed CC-BY-4.0
🔓 Open OA copy View at publisher

Abstract

The presence of the Indonesia Carbon Exchange (ICE), puts pressure on management to carry out its active role in reducing the potential of climate change through business strategies such as disclosure and improving carbon performance. This study seeks to prove the significant difference in carbon disclosure and performance after the launch of the ICE, as well as to reviews the profound differences in the increase in carbon disclosure and performance in the high and low polluting sectors in the population of companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange for the 2022 and 2024 periods. The two research models used in formulating the results are the Wilcoxon Test and the Diference-in-Diference Model. The results of this study indicate a significant difference in carbon disclosure and performance after the launch of ICE, which illustrates the changing dynamics of environmental regulations encouraging companies to improve transparency and corporate carbon performance in an effort to maintain their legitimacy. This study show there was no significant difference in the comprehensiveness of carbon disclosure or the improvement in carbon performance between high and low-polluting sector after the launch of ICE.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-05-22T02:00:06.705733+00:00
License: CC-BY-4.0