Comparative analysis of the demographics, vital signs, injury patterns, care pathways, interventions and outcomes of English and Welsh major trauma patients injured by high versus low energy transfer mechanisms in 2019

Comparative analysis of the demographics, vital signs, injury patterns, care pathways, interventions and outcomes of English and Welsh major trauma patients injured by high versus low energy transfer mechanisms in 2019 | medRxiv /* */ /* */ <!-- <!-- /*! * yepnope1.5.4 * (c) WTFPL, GPLv2 */ (function(a,b,c){function d(a){return"[object Function]"==o.call(a)}function e(a){return"string"==typeof a}function f(){}function g(a){return!a||"loaded"==a||"complete"==a||"uninitialized"==a}function h(){var a=p.shift();q=1,a?a.t?m(function(){("c"==a.t?B.injectCss:B.injectJs)(a.s,0,a.a,a.x,a.e,1)},0):(a(),h()):q=0}function i(a,c,d,e,f,i,j){function k(b){if(!o&&g(l.readyState)&&(u.r=o=1,!q&&h(),l.onload=l.onreadystatechange=null,b)){"img"!=a&&m(function(){t.removeChild(l)},50);for(var d in y[c])y[c].hasOwnProperty(d)&&y[c][d].onload()}}var j=j||B.errorTimeout,l=b.createElement(a),o=0,r=0,u={t:d,s:c,e:f,a:i,x:j};1===y[c]&&(r=1,y[c]=[]),"object"==a?l.data=c:(l.src=c,l.type=a),l.width=l.height="0",l.onerror=l.onload=l.onreadystatechange=function(){k.call(this,r)},p.splice(e,0,u),"img"!=a&&(r||2===y[c]?(t.insertBefore(l,s?null:n),m(k,j)):y[c].push(l))}function j(a,b,c,d,f){return q=0,b=b||"j",e(a)?i("c"==b?v:u,a,b,this.i++,c,d,f):(p.splice(this.i++,0,a),1==p.length&&h()),this}function k(){var a=B;return a.loader={load:j,i:0},a}var l=b.documentElement,m=a.setTimeout,n=b.getElementsByTagName("script")[0],o={}.toString,p=[],q=0,r="MozAppearance"in l.style,s=r&&!!b.createRange().compareNode,t=s?l:n.parentNode,l=a.opera&&"[object Opera]"==o.call(a.opera),l=!!b.attachEvent&&!l,u=r?"object":l?"script":"img",v=l?"script":u,w=Array.isArray||function(a){return"[object Array]"==o.call(a)},x=[],y={},z={timeout:function(a,b){return b.length&&(a.timeout=b[0]),a}},A,B;B=function(a){function b(a){var a=a.split("!"),b=x.length,c=a.pop(),d=a.length,c={url:c,origUrl:c,prefixes:a},e,f,g;for(f=0;f<d;f++)g=a[f].split("="),(e=z[g.shift()])&&(c=e(c,g));for(f=0;f<b;f++)c=x[f](c);return c}function g(a,e,f,g,h){var i=b(a),j=i.autoCallback;i.url.split(".").pop().split("?").shift(),i.bypass||(e&&(e=d(e)?e:e[a]||e[g]||e[a.split("/").pop().split("?")[0]]),i.instead?i.instead(a,e,f,g,h):(y[i.url]?i.noexec=!0:y[i.url]=1,f.load(i.url,i.forceCSS||!i.forceJS&&"css"==i.url.split(".").pop().split("?").shift()?"c":c,i.noexec,i.attrs,i.timeout),(d(e)||d(j))&&f.load(function(){k(),e&&e(i.origUrl,h,g),j&&j(i.origUrl,h,g),y[i.url]=2})))}function h(a,b){function c(a,c){if(a){if(e(a))c||(j=function(){var a=[].slice.call(arguments);k.apply(this,a),l()}),g(a,j,b,0,h);else if(Object(a)===a)for(n in m=function(){var b=0,c;for(c in a)a.hasOwnProperty(c)&&b++;return b}(),a)a.hasOwnProperty(n)&&(!c&&!--m&&(d(j)?j=function(){var a=[].slice.call(arguments);k.apply(this,a),l()}:j[n]=function(a){return function(){var b=[].slice.call(arguments);a&&a.apply(this,b),l()}}(k[n])),g(a[n],j,b,n,h))}else!c&&l()}var h=!!a.test,i=a.load||a.both,j=a.callback||f,k=j,l=a.complete||f,m,n;c(h?a.yep:a.nope,!!i),i&&c(i)}var i,j,l=this.yepnope.loader;if(e(a))g(a,0,l,0);else if(w(a))for(i=0;i (function(w,d,s,l,i){w[l]=w[l]||[];w[l].push({'gtm.start':new Date().getTime(),event:'gtm.js'});var f=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0];var j=d.createElement(s);var dl=l!='dataLayer'?'&l='+l:'';j.src='//www.googletagmanager.com/gtm.js?id='+i+dl;j.type='text/javascript';j.async=true;f.parentNode.insertBefore(j,f);})(window,document,'script','dataLayer','GTM-P4HH5NV'); Skip to main content Home About Submit ALERTS / RSS Search for this keyword Advanced Search Comparative analysis of the demographics, vital signs, injury patterns, care pathways, interventions and outcomes of English and Welsh major trauma patients injured by high versus low energy transfer mechanisms in 2019 View ORCID Profile Thomas AG Shanahan , View ORCID Profile Michael Tonkins , View ORCID Profile Omar Bouamra , View ORCID Profile Dhushy Surendra Kumar , View ORCID Profile Antoinette Edwards , Laura White , View ORCID Profile Anthony Kehoe , View ORCID Profile Jason E Smith , View ORCID Profile Timothy J Coats , View ORCID Profile Fiona Lecky doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.06.30.25330560 Thomas AG Shanahan 1 Royal Perth Hospital , Perth, WA, Australia Roles: Emergency medicine research registrar Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site ORCID record for Thomas AG Shanahan For correspondence: Thomasalexandergerrard.shanahan{at}health.wa.gov.au Michael Tonkins 2 Emergency Medicine and Intensive Care, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals Roles: Speciality Registrar Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site ORCID record for Michael Tonkins Omar Bouamra Roles: Medical Statistician Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site ORCID record for Omar Bouamra Dhushy Surendra Kumar 3 National Major Trauma Registry Roles: Director of Clinical Audit Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site ORCID record for Dhushy Surendra Kumar Antoinette Edwards 3 National Major Trauma Registry Roles: Executive Director Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site ORCID record for Antoinette Edwards Laura White 3 National Major Trauma Registry Roles: Operations Director Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site Anthony Kehoe 4 Musgrove Park Hospital , Taunton Roles: Consultant in Emergency Medicine Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site ORCID record for Anthony Kehoe Jason E Smith 5 University Hospitals Plymouth NHS Trust Roles: Consultant in Emergency Medicine Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site ORCID record for Jason E Smith Timothy J Coats 6 The University of Leicester Roles: Professor of Emergency Medicine Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site ORCID record for Timothy J Coats Fiona Lecky 7 The University of Sheffield Roles: Professor of Emergency Medicine Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site ORCID record for Fiona Lecky Abstract Full Text Info/History Metrics Data/Code Preview PDF Abstract Background Recent trends in high-income countries indicate a shift in the causes of major trauma, with low-energy transfer mechanisms, particularly falls from less than two meters, becoming increasingly prevalent. This study aimed to compare the demographics, care processes, and outcomes of major trauma patients injured by low and high-energy transfer mechanisms. Methods This comparative cohort study utilized anonymized data from adult patients recorded in the Trauma Audit and Research Network in 2019. Patients were categorized into low-energy (falls less than 2 meters) and high-energy (other mechanisms) groups. The study focused on patients with an Injury Severity Score (ISS) greater than 15. Data from up to 179 English and Welsh hospitals were included. Results In 2019, 53.6% (n=16,087) of major trauma patients were injured by low-energy falls. When compared to the high-energy cohort, these affected older patients (median age 80 vs. 47 years), with a higher prevalence of pre-existing comorbidities (90.4% vs. 56.2%) and traumatic brain injuries (74.0% vs. 49.8%). Low-energy fall patients were more likely to be initially treated in Trauma Units rather than Major Trauma Centres and received fewer interventions such as surgery and critical care admission. Low-energy falls patients had a higher in-hospital mortality rate (16.1% vs. 12.6%). Conclusions The increasing burden of major trauma from low-energy falls necessitates a re-evaluation of current trauma care systems and injury prevention strategies to better serve this distinct and growing patient population. Future research should focus on optimizing care pathways, defining patient orientated outcomes and improving outcomes for patients injured by low-energy falls. Introduction Classifying injuries by energy transfer has received growing attention recently by trauma systems ( 1 – 3 ). Globally, injuries sustained through high-energy transfer mechanisms, such as road traffic collisions are ranked as the top cause of disability-adjusted life-years lost for people aged 10-49 years ( 4 ). However, recent studies in high income countries have identified injuries from low-energy transfer mechanisms, such as falls less than two metres, as an increasingly common cause of major trauma presenting to hospital ( 2 , 5 , 6 - 7 ). Between 2012-2017, falls from less than two meters accounted for 57.8% (n=177,623) of all major trauma cases with an Injury Severity Score (ISS) >8 in the Trauma Audit and Research Network (TARN) in England and Wales ( 8 ). These low-energy falls occur predominately in older people (over 64 years) ( 9 , 10 ) who are more likely to fall due to factors such as ageing, frailty, multiple co-morbidities, polypharmacy, and cognitive decline ( 11 ). In 2018 we reported profound changes in the demographics of recorded major trauma cases in the largest European trauma registry between 1990 and 2013, with an increase in the mean age of major trauma patients (from 36 to 53 years) and a decline in male preponderance (73.0% to 69.0%) ( 12 ). Low-energy falls replaced road traffic collisions as the commonest mechanism of injury ( 9 ). Accurate and up to date understanding of the characteristics and volume of major trauma patients is necessary for effective injury prevention and for developing optimal trauma care systems – both of which are currently designed to respond to those injured by high-energy transfer mechanisms. Therefore, the aim of our study was to compare the demographics, care processes and outcomes of patients with severe injuries caused by low and high-energy transfer mechanisms. Methods Study design and setting We conducted a comparative cohort study of patients within the TARN registry in 2019 categorised as either high-energy or low-energy by injury mechanism ( 2 ). Low-energy was defined as falls from less than two metres. High-energy was all other mechanisms, such as road traffic collisions and falls from more than 2 meters. The study design and reporting followed the STROBE guidance for observational studies ( 13 ). The study size was determined by the number of eligible patients included in the TARN database. Participants The inclusion criteria for the TARN registry are as follows: patients of all ages who sustain injury resulting in hospital admission over three days, critical care admission, transfer to a tertiary/specialist centre or death within 30 days of hospital arrival. Isolated femoral neck or single pubic ramus fracture in patients [over] 65 years and simple isolated injuries are excluded. After study inclusion, a dataset of prospectively recorded variables covering demographics plus injury-related physiological, investigation, treatment and outcome parameters are collated using a standard web-based case record form by trained TARN hospital audit co-ordinators. Injury descriptions from imaging, operative and necropsy reports are submitted by TARN co-ordinators. All injuries are coded centrally using the Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS), which enables calculation of the Injury Severity Score (ISS) ( 14 ). Anonymised data from adult patients (18 years and over) with severe injuries (ISS > 15) admitted between January 1, 2019, and December 31, 2019, were collated for analysis. The study was closed at the end of 2019 to avoid the confounding impact of the COVID-19 lockdown on the major trauma disease burden and patient outcomes, which has been studied elsewhere ( 15 ). Data sources and variables The following variables were extracted from the TARN database for analysis: Demographics: gender; age; pre-existing medical conditions. Vital signs on arrival into ED: heart rate, systolic blood pressure; Glasgow Comma Scale (GCS); oxygen saturation. Injuries: penetrating; ISS; injury regions with AIS 3+ Pathway: defined as the level of trauma hospital involvement: first MTC hospital; MTC any time to include transfers from other hospitals into an MTC. Interventions: prehospital doctor; seen by a consultant in ED; Tranexamic acid (TXA) given; TXA given for those given blood; intubation; time to CT; had operation within 24 hours; time to surgery; critical care admission Patient outcomes: Acute care length of stay (LOS); intensive care unit (ICU) LOS; mortality at 30 days post admission or discharge whichever was earlier. Variables are all extracted from the clinical record (demographics, vital signs and outcomes) only AIS and ISS are derived, and pre-existing medical conditions used the modified Charleson Comorbidity Index ( 16 ). Statistical methods We carried out a comparative analysis by energy transfer level. Continuous and ordinal variables (age, time intervals, GCS, AIS, ISS) are presented as median and interquartile range (IQR). Categorical variables are presented as number and percentage. Chi-squared tests were used to compare categorical variables between low-energy and high-energy categories. Bonnet-Price test was used for differences of median for continuous variables. In the analysis of hospital mortality, mortality at 30 days or at discharge (whichever occurred first) was used as the dependent variable, with admission year as an independent exposure. For the missing values of the arrival Glasgow Coma Scale, a previously reported imputation technique based on chained equations and Rubin’s rules was used with the assumption that the mechanism of missingness is at random (MAR) that is the missing value depends on the measured variables. The imputation contained all the variables included in the study and the outcome ( 12 ). Patient and public involvement The TARN research committee approves all study proposals using TARN data and reports twice yearly to the TARN Board. TARN Board membership includes patient and public representation. There was no specific patient and public involvement in this analysis. Ethics The UK Health Research Authority Patient Information Advisory Group (PIAG) has given approval (Section 20) for TARN analysis of anonymised patient data. Results The study included 30,582 patients. Patients injured by low-energy falls (53.6%, n=16,087) were older (median age 80 vs. 47 years; p<0.001), less likely to be male (53.8% vs. 73.8%; p<0.001), more likely to have pre-injury co-morbidity (90.4% vs. 56.2%; p<0.001), less likely to have polytrauma (10.8% vs. 38.2%; p<0.001) and more likely to have a traumatic brain injury visible on CT scan (74.0% vs. 49.8%; p<0.001) than patients injured by high-energy transfer (46.4%, n=14,495) ( Table 1 ). Although most patients in both groups presented with normal or only mildly impaired consciousness (GCS 13-15) the low-energy falls cohort were less than half as likely to present with severe impairment of consciousness (GCS 3-8, 6.0% vs. 15.3%; p<0.001) ( Table 1 ). Overall, the anatomical injury severity was lower in the low-energy cohort (median ISS 20 vs. 25 ; p<0.001; Table 1 ). View this table: View inline View popup Table 1: Comparison of major trauma patients injured by low versus high energy transfer in 2019 – all TARN Hospitals: Demographics; vital signs; and injuries Patients in the low-energy falls cohort were more likely to initially present to a Trauma Unit (TU) (58.3% vs. 33.0%; p<0.001) and less likely to receive Major Trauma Centre (MTC) care at any time (49.8% vs. 76.6%; p<0.001) than the high-energy transfer cohort ( Table 2 ). They were seen less frequently by a doctor in the prehospital environment (1.7% vs. 17.0%; p<0.001) or consultant in the emergency department (37.6% vs. 69.1%; p<0.001) ( Table 1 ). The low-energy transfer cohort received tranexamic acid (TXA) less frequently both on admission (6.1% vs. 35.8%; p<0.001) and if administered blood products (75.0% vs. 94.3%; p<0.001) ( Table 1 ). Although rates of CT imaging were greater in the low-energy falls cohort (90.6 vs. 86.9%; p<0.001) they waited longer from arrival at hospital for imaging (median time to CT or MR 138 vs. 38 mins; p<0.001), were less likely to require acute endotracheal intubation (6.3% vs 22.3%; p<0.001), be admitted to critical care (14.1% vs. 40.2%; p<0.001) or require surgery within 24 hours (9.3% vs. 23.1%; p<0.001) ( Table 2 ). Times from hospital arrival to surgery were also longer (8.5 vs. 5.7 hours; p<0.001) ( Table 2 ). View this table: View inline View popup Download powerpoint Table 2: Comparison of major trauma patients injured by low versus high energy transfer in 2019 – all TARN Hospitals: pathway; interventions and outcomes. The low-energy falls cohort stayed on average one day (median nine vs. eight days; p<0.001) longer in hospital but had shorter critical care stays (median three vs. four days; p<0.001). Unadjusted hospital mortality was 3.5% greater in the low-energy falls cohort (16.1% [95%CI 15% - 17%] vs. 12.6% [95%CI 12% - 13%]; p<0.0001) ( Table 2 ). Due to the large number of patients included in the analysis all the differences between the low and high-energy cohorts were statistically significant apart from GCS on arrival and oxygen saturation. All data was 100% complete other than the Charleson co-morbidity index, which was missing in 2% of patients and GCS, which was missing in 8.2% of patients prior to imputation. Discussion Summary of findings In 2019, low-energy falls accounted for 53.6% of the most severely injured major trauma patients in the national major trauma registry. This cohort is substantially older, suffers more comorbidities, and presents with less physiological derangement. They suffer a greater proportion of head and thoracic injuries, but their injury severity score was lower. They were more likely to be treated in TUs, less likely to receive consultant-led care, had longer waits for imagining, fewer interventions, and higher unadjusted mortality. Strengths and limitations of the study Although many high-income countries have seen similar trends and the pattern of ageing varies between countries, our results may not be internationally generalisable. The large number of patients in each cohort is a strength but it is also means it is difficult to interpret the results as even trivial differences between the cohorts may be statistically significant. TARN case ascertainment at TUs is less complete than at MTCs, and therefore our results may include a degree of bias in the direction of under-reporting low-energy major trauma at TUs. Comparison with existing literature Our analysis confirms the large burden of major trauma from low-energy falls and the predominance of severe head injuries, particularly in patients over 64 years of age, found by this group in England and Wales (( 9 , 17 ). These findings align with previous work showing that TBI is most common injury in older trauma patients ( 9 ). The results are consistent with a previous study (Lecky, et al 2021), which found differences in care pathways for TBI patients injured by low and high-energy mechanisms and argued for a different approach to improve prevention and care for TBI patients injured through falls less than two metres ( 2 ). The observation that in 2019 most of the low-energy major trauma cohort (58.3% versus 33.0% of the high-energy cohort) were first treated in a TU and were less likely to receive consultant review suggests that current pre-hospital triage tools (which incorporate high energy mechanism of injury and deranged physiological parameters) are not sufficiently sensitive to detect the severity of their injuries. This is consistent with the findings of the CENTER TBI ( 2 ). The challenge of accurately triaging older patients is well recognised ( 18 - 24 ), and the poor accuracy of all current methods was the finding of a recent systematic review( 24 ). This may be explained by the different pathophysiology of traumatic brain injury in the two cohorts, highlighted by the greater likelihood of intracranial injury in the low-energy cohort that is not reflected in the initial GCS ( Table 1 ). The findings of CENTER TBI suggest that acute sub-dural haematoma (ASDH) is the predominant CT finding in the low energy cohort with head injury (49% of the low energy TBI cohort with injuries on CT brain - 18% described as “large”) reporting that most high and low energy patients with large ASDH received a craniotomy ( 2 ). However, CENTER TBI was conducted solely in specialist neuroscience centres - and did not include patients from referring hospitals who were not accepted for transfer. Our “whole system” findings suggest that most low energy major trauma patients with positive CT brain scans after head injury are not accepted for neuroscience/ MTC secondary transfer. Other studies on TARN patients injured in low falls (2015-2019) suggest that initial ambulance transport to the nearest hospital emergency department rather than a more distance specialist major trauma centre does not adversely impact outcomes providing later selective secondary transfer is available ( 25 ). Furthermore, in older adults with ISS>15 - most of whom are injured in low-energy falls - a frailty score and comprehensive geriatric assessment are more important components of care than the immediate availability of surgical specialists ( 26 , 27 ). Interpretation of the study and implications The growing burden of major trauma resulting from low-energy falls is not new, nor is the fact that these patients have difference characteristics compared to patients injured by high-energy transfer mechanism. However, this study updates our understanding that patients with major trauma caused by low-energy falls are older and present with more normal physiology, despite having traumatic brain injury and thoracic injuries ( 9 ). These differences seem important in planning the next phase of development of integrated trauma systems. The lower rates of MTC admission at any time, surgical intervention, and admission to critical care in the low-energy cohort are difficult to interpret. There may be systematic access barriers to higher level care in older patients. However, it seems that these patients have a much lower requirement for the specialist surgical intervention that is provided in MTCs, as most have head injuries that do not receive surgical intervention ( 9 ). This might be due to smaller intracranial haematomas requiring evacuation ( 2 ). Moreover, it has already been demonstrated that the ISS had only a low-to-moderate correlation with the need for life-saving interventions ( 28 ). The low-energy transfer trauma group may therefore need much more emphasis on multidisciplinary geriatric assessment, care and rehabilitation ( 26 , 27 ). This means that the most appropriate treatment location in future should be driven by the availability of these services rather than trauma surgery. In some places multi-disciplinary geriatric trauma care expertise will be concentrated in MTCs, but in some systems local hospitals will have all the skills required, so MTC transfer will not be required. This multi-disciplinary care and rehabilitation has already been shown to improve outcomes after hip fracture ( 29 ) so the same model could be extended to treat other low-energy transfer patients. The optimal pathways through the trauma care system have not been well defined and it is likely that patient factors such as frailty (TARN commenced recording clinical frailty scores in mid-2019) and ceiling of care decisions (not currently collected) may be important for future care pathway analyses. Future research There is a pressing international need to examine how well the components of trauma networks and injury prevention initiatives serve the increasing volume of major trauma patients injured through low-energy falls. Present systems of both prevention and treatment of major trauma are based on the historical importance of patients injured through road traffic collisions, penetrating trauma and other high-energy injury mechanisms. Research prioritisation processes in trauma care have highlighted the importance of research to define optimal pathways for modern trauma care given the change in the population (30-32–). Focussing research on early identification of low-energy falls patients that benefit from specialist trauma and neurosurgical input,, optimal TBI and chest wall injury management, role of early rehabilitation and better definition of what outcomes are important to patients. Conclusion The aging major trauma population, predominantly injured through low-energy falls and suffering severe head injuries, challenges current trauma system design and resource allocation. Although these patients are less likely to require intensive care and surgical interventions, their increasing numbers necessitate an evolution in trauma care pathways. Future research should define which TBI subtypes in low energy falls benefit from neurosurgical intervention; develop patient-centred outcome measures for low-energy falls patients that integrate functional recovery and quality of life and; test care pathways that combine early geriatric assessment with targeted interventions for chest injuries and neurosurgical consultation for high-risk sub-groups. Data Availability Data cannot be shared as both: (i) the Data Sharing Agreements established between the TARN and member NHS Trusts, and (ii) the Section 251 HRA approval for analysis of anonymized TARN data specify the need for data access agreements with third parties. Proposals to access the study data, data dictionary, analytic code, and analysis scripts may be submitted online via www.tarn.ac.uk. Proposals are subject to review by the TARN Research committee. A Data Transfer Agreement is required, and all access must comply with TARN HRA approval. Contributorship Statement FL, TC and AE designed the study. LW commented on data collection. OB performed statistical analysis. TS and MT interpreted the analysis and drafted the manuscript. All authors contributed to editing of the drafts and agreed with the final manuscript for submission. FL is the guarantor of the manuscript. Ethics Statement TARN (now National Major Trauma Registry) holds UK Health Research Authority Confidentiality Advisory Group approval for analysis of anonymised patient data -Section 251 NHS Act (2006). Public and Patient Involvement Statement The TARN research committee approves all study proposals using TARN data and reports twice yearly to the TARN Board. TARN Board membership includes patient and public representation. Transparency Statement The lead author (the manuscript’s guarantor) affirms that the manuscript is an honest, accurate, and transparent account of the study being reported; that no important aspects of the study have been omitted; and that any discrepancies from the study as originally planned (and, if relevant, registered) have been explained. Competing Interests All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form at www.icmje.org/coi_disclosure.pdf and declare: TARN part remunerates FL, TC and DK in their roles as Research Director, Chair and Audit Director, respectively. AE and LW are full time employees of TARN (Executive and Operations Directors). Participating NHS Trusts funds TARN. TS and MT were academic clinical fellowship when the work was conducted and that was funded by Health Education England (HEE) / NIHR for this research project. The views expressed in this publication are those of the author(s) and not necessarily those of the NIHR, NHS or the UK Department of Health and Social Care. no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work. Role of funding source TARN part remunerates FL, TC and DK in their roles as Research Director, Chair and Audit Director, respectively. AE and LW are full time employees of TARN (Executive and Operations Directors). Participating NHS Trusts funds TARN. TS and MT, academic clinical fellowships are funded by Health Education England (HEE) / NIHR for this research project. The views expressed in this publication are those of the author(s) and not necessarily those of the NIHR, NHS or the UK Department of Health and Social Care. no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work. All authors are independent from funders and that all authors, external and internal, had full access to all the data (including statistical reports and tables) in the study and can take responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis is also required. Data Sharing Statement Data cannot be shared as both: (i) the Data Sharing Agreements established between the TARN and member NHS Trusts, and (ii) the Section 251 HRA approval for analysis of anonymized TARN data specify the need for data access agreements with third parties. Proposals to access the study data, data dictionary, analytic code, and analysis scripts may be submitted online via www.tarn.ac.uk . Proposals are subject to review by the TARN Research committee. A Data Transfer Agreement is required, and all access must comply with TARN HRA approval. Acknowledgments When this work was first conducted it was under the auspices of TARN, which has subsequently become the National Major Trauma Registry. Footnotes Michael.tonkins1{at}nhs.net Omar_bouamra{at}yahoo.com dhushy.kumar{at}uhcw.nhs.net Antoinette.edwards5{at}nhs.net Laura.white88{at}nhs.net Tony.kehoe{at}nhs.net jasonesmith{at}nhs.net tim.coats{at}leicester.ac.uk f.e.lecky{at}sheffield.ac.uk ↵ + senior author References 1. ↵ Davies F , Coats TJ . ‘Stealth trauma’ in the young and the old: the next challenge for major trauma networks? Emerg Med J EMJ . 2020 Feb ; 37 ( 2 ): 56 – 7 . OpenUrl PubMed 2. ↵ Lecky FE , Otesile O , Marincowitz C , Majdan M , Nieboer D , Lingsma HF , et al. The burden of traumatic brain injury from low-energy falls among patients from 18 countries in the CENTER-TBI Registry: A comparative cohort study . PLOS Med . 2021 Sep 14; 18 ( 9 ): e1003761 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 3. ↵ Coats TJ , Lecky F. ‘Major trauma’: now two separate diseases? Emerg Med J . 2017 Aug 1; 34 ( 8 ): 494 – 494 . OpenUrl FREE Full Text 4. ↵ GBD 2019 Diseases and Injuries Collaborators . Global burden of 369 diseases and injuries in 204 countries and territories, 1990-2019: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019 . Lancet Lond Engl . 2020 Oct 17; 396 ( 10258 ): 1204 – 22 . OpenUrl 5. ↵ Cameron PA , Fitzgerald MC , Curtis K , McKie E , Gabbe B , Earnest A , et al. on behalf of the Australian Trauma Quality Improvement Program (AusTQIP) collaboration . Over view of major traumatic injury in Australia – implications for trauma system design . Injury . 2020 Jan ; 51 ( 1 ): 114 – 121 OpenUrl PubMed 6. ↵ Farrow L , Diffley T , Gordon M , Khan A , Capek E , Anand A , et al. Epidemiology of major trauma in older adults within Scotland: A national perspective from the Scottish Trauma Audit Group (STAG) . Injury . 2023 Dec ; 54 ( 12 ) 7. ↵ Spering C , Lefering R , Bouillon B , Lehmann W , von Eckardstein K , Dresing K , et al. It is time for a change in the management of elderly severely injured patients! An analysis of 126,015 patients from the TraumaRegister DGU® . Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg Off Publ Eur Trauma Soc . 2020 Jun ; 46 ( 3 ): 487 – 97 . OpenUrl 8. ↵ Dixon JR , Lecky F , Bouamra O , Dixon P , Wilson F , Edwards A , et al. Age and the distribution of major injury across a national trauma system . Age Ageing . 2020 Feb 27; 49 ( 2 ): 218 – 26 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 9. ↵ TARN - Major Trauma In Older People - 2017 Report [Internet] . [cited 2023 May 10 ]. Available from: https://www.tarn.ac.uk/Content.aspx?c=3793 10. ↵ Dixon J , Bouamra O , Lecky F , Hing CB , Baxter M , Eardley W. Regional variation in the provision of major trauma services for the older injured patient . Injury . 2022 Jul ; 53 ( 7 ): 2470 – 7 . OpenUrl PubMed 11. ↵ Halter M , Jarman H , Moss P , Kulnik ST , Baramova D , Gavalova L , et al. Configurations and outcomes of acute hospital care for frail and older patients with moderate to major trauma: a systematic review . BMJ Open . 2023 Feb 21; 13 ( 2 ): e066329 . OpenUrl Abstract / FREE Full Text 12. ↵ Moran CG , Lecky F , Bouamra O , Lawrence T , Edwards A , Woodford M , et al. Changing the System - Major Trauma Patients and Their Outcomes in the NHS (England) 2008–17 . EClinicalMedicine . 2018 Sep ; 2–3 : 13 . OpenUrl 13. ↵ von Elm E , Altman DG , Egger M , Pocock SJ , Gøtzsche PC , Vandenbroucke JP , et al. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies . J Clin Epidemiol . 2008 Apr ; 61 ( 4 ): 344 – 9 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Web of Science 14. ↵ TARN . The Trauma Audit and Research Network Procedures Manual . TARN , University of Manchester and Health Commission ; 15. ↵ Marincowitz C , Bouamra O , Coats T , Kumar DS , Lockey D , Mason L , et al. Major trauma presentations and patient outcomes in English hospitals during the COVID-19 pandemic: An observational cohort study . PLOS Med . 2023 Jun 14; 20 ( 6 ): e1004243 . OpenUrl PubMed 16. ↵ Bouamra O , Jacques R , Edwards A , Yates D , Lawrence T , Jenks T , Woodford M , Lecky F. Prediction modelling for trauma using comorbidity and ‘true’ 30-day outcome . Emerg M J . 2015 Dec ; 32 ( 12 ): 933 – 8 . OpenUrl 17. ↵ Kehoe A , Smith J , Edwards A , Yates D , Lecky F. The changing face of majro trauma in the UK . Emerg M J . 2015 ; 32 : 911 – 5 OpenUrl 18. ↵ Jiang L , Zheng Z , Zhang M. The incidence of geriatric trauma is increasing and comparison of different scoring tools for the prediction of in-hospital mortality in geriatric trauma patients . World J Emerg Surg WJES . 2020 Oct 19; 15 ( 1 ): 59 . OpenUrl PubMed 19. Lehmann R , Beekley A , Casey L , Salim A , Martin M. The impact of advancedage on trauma triage decisions and outcomes: a statewide analysis . Am J Surg . 2009 May ; 197 ( 5 ): 571 – 4 ; discussion 574-575. OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Web of Science 20. Hoyle AC , Biant LC , Young M. Undertriage of the elderly major trauma patient continues in major trauma centre care: a retrospective cohort review . Emerg Med J EMJ . 2020 Aug ; 37 ( 8 ): 508 – 14 . OpenUrl PubMed 21. Chang DC , Bass RR , Cornwell EE , Mackenzie EJ . Undertriage of elderly trauma patients to state-designated trauma centers . Arch Surg Chic Ill 1960 . 2008 Aug ; 143 ( 8 ): 776 – 81 ; discussion 782. OpenUrl 22. Nakamura Y , Daya M , Bulger EM , Schreiber M , Mackersie R , Hsia RY , et al. Evaluating age in the field triage of injured persons . Ann Emerg Med . 2012 Sep ; 60 ( 3 ): 335 – 45 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 23. Staudenmayer KL , Hsia RY , Mann NC , Spain DA , Newgard CD . Triage of elderly trauma patients: a population-based perspective . J Am Coll Surg . 2013 Oct ; 217 ( 4 ): 569 – 76 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 24. ↵ Fuller G , Pandor A , Essat M , Sabir L , Buckley-Woods H , Chatha H , et al. Diagnostic accuracy of prehospital triage tools for identifying major trauma in elderly injured patients: A systematic review . J Trauma Acute Care Surg . 2021 Feb 1; 90 ( 2 ): 403 – 12 . OpenUrl PubMed 25. ↵ Tonkins M , Bouamra O , Lecky F. Association between major trauma centre care and outcomes of adult patients injured by low falls in England and Wales . Emerg Med J . 2023 Apr 1; 40 ( 4 ): 257 – 63 . OpenUrl Abstract / FREE Full Text 26. ↵ Carter B , Shipway D , Lecky F , Parry F , Thompson J , Baxter M , et al. A national study of 23 major trauma centres to investigate the effect of frailty on clinical outcomes in older people admitted with serious injury in England (FiTR 1): a multicentre observational study . Lancet Healthy Longev [Internet] . 2022 Aug 1 [cited 2023 May 7 ]; 3 . Available from: https://discovery.researcher.life/article/a-national-study-of-23-major-trauma-centres-to-investigate-the-effect-of-frailty-on-clinical-outcomes-in-older-people-admitted-with-serious-injury-in-england-fitr-1-a-multicentre-observational-study/a6a843f70c6a3b439bece0679eeae657 27. ↵ Gordon A , Carter B , Shipway D , Carlton E , Lecky F , Benger J , et al. A national study of 23 major trauma centres to investigate the effect of a geriatrician assessment on clinical outcomes in older people admitted with serious injury in England (FiTR 2): a multicentre observational cohort study . Lancet Healthy Longev [Internet] . 2022 Aug 1 [cited 2023 May 7 ]; 3 . Available from: https://discovery.researcher.life/article/a-national-study-of-23-major-trauma-centres-to-investigate-the-effect-of-a-geriatrician-assessment-on-clinical-outcomes-in-older-people-admitted-with-serious-injury-in-england-fitr-2-a-multicentre-observational-cohort-study/fbd153defe0a334d9f6fb2f0c0154483 28. ↵ Vassallo J , Fuller G , Smith JE . Relationship between the Injury Severity Score and the need for life-saving interventions in trauma patients in the UK . Emerg Med J EMJ . 2020 Aug ; 37 ( 8 ): 502 – 7 . OpenUrl PubMed 29. ↵ Middleton M. Orthogeriatrics and Hip Fracture Care in the UK: Factors Driving Change to More Integrated Models of Care . Geriatr Basel Switz . 2018 Aug 28; 3 ( 3 ): 55 . OpenUrl 30. Cottey L , Shanahan TAG , Gronlund T , Whiting C , Sokunbi M , Carley SD , et al. Refreshing the emergency medicine research priorities . Emerg Med J EMJ . 2023 Sep ; 40 ( 9 ): 666 – 70 . OpenUrl PubMed 31. Research priorities for the management of major trauma: an international priority setting partnership with the James Lind Alliance - PubMed [Internet] . [cited 2024 Aug 10 ]. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38754886/ 32. Curtis K , Nahidi S , Gabbe B , Vallmuur K , Martin K , Shaban RZ , et al. Identifying the priority challenges in trauma care delivery for Australian and New Zealand trauma clinicians . Injury . 2020 Sep ; 51 ( 9 ): 2053 – 8 . OpenUrl PubMed View the discussion thread. Back to top Previous Next Posted June 30, 2025. Download PDF Data/Code Email Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv. NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article. Your Email * Your Name * Send To * Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas. You are going to email the following Comparative analysis of the demographics, vital signs, injury patterns, care pathways, interventions and outcomes of English and Welsh major trauma patients injured by high versus low energy transfer mechanisms in 2019 Message Subject (Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv Message Body (Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website. Your Personal Message CAPTCHA This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions. Share Comparative analysis of the demographics, vital signs, injury patterns, care pathways, interventions and outcomes of English and Welsh major trauma patients injured by high versus low energy transfer mechanisms in 2019 Thomas AG Shanahan , Michael Tonkins , Omar Bouamra , Dhushy Surendra Kumar , Antoinette Edwards , Laura White , Anthony Kehoe , Jason E Smith , Timothy J Coats , Fiona Lecky medRxiv 2025.06.30.25330560; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.06.30.25330560 Share This Article: Copy Citation Tools Comparative analysis of the demographics, vital signs, injury patterns, care pathways, interventions and outcomes of English and Welsh major trauma patients injured by high versus low energy transfer mechanisms in 2019 Thomas AG Shanahan , Michael Tonkins , Omar Bouamra , Dhushy Surendra Kumar , Antoinette Edwards , Laura White , Anthony Kehoe , Jason E Smith , Timothy J Coats , Fiona Lecky medRxiv 2025.06.30.25330560; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.06.30.25330560 Citation Manager Formats BibTeX Bookends EasyBib EndNote (tagged) EndNote 8 (xml) Medlars Mendeley Papers RefWorks Tagged Ref Manager RIS Zotero Tweet Widget Facebook Like Google Plus One Subject Area Emergency Medicine Subject Areas All Articles Addiction Medicine (567) Allergy and Immunology (863) Anesthesia (297) Cardiovascular Medicine (4411) Dentistry and Oral Medicine (443) Dermatology (380) Emergency Medicine (606) Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (1505) Epidemiology (15205) Forensic Medicine (30) Gastroenterology (1119) Genetic and Genomic Medicine (6574) Geriatric Medicine (666) Health Economics (994) Health Informatics (4511) Health Policy (1365) Health Systems and Quality Improvement (1608) Hematology (537) HIV/AIDS (1263) Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (15903) Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (1103) Medical Education (620) Medical Ethics (144) Nephrology (665) Neurology (6573) Nursing (345) Nutrition (998) Obstetrics and Gynecology (1139) Occupational and Environmental Health (954) Oncology (3319) Ophthalmology (967) Orthopedics (369) Otolaryngology (420) Pain Medicine (435) Palliative Medicine (129) Pathology (662) Pediatrics (1689) Pharmacology and Therapeutics (691) Primary Care Research (710) Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (5421) Public and Global Health (9205) Radiology and Imaging (2191) Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (1367) Respiratory Medicine (1191) Rheumatology (593) Sexual and Reproductive Health (709) Sports Medicine (529) Surgery (709) Toxicology (99) Transplantation (288) Urology (265) (function(){function c(){var b=a.contentDocument||a.contentWindow.document;if(b){var d=b.createElement('script');d.innerHTML="window.__CF$cv$params={r:'9fe848b2a9c2ad07',t:'MTc3OTI0ODA0OQ=='};var a=document.createElement('script');a.src='/cdn-cgi/challenge-platform/scripts/jsd/main.js';document.getElementsByTagName('head')[0].appendChild(a);";b.getElementsByTagName('head')[0].appendChild(d)}}if(document.body){var a=document.createElement('iframe');a.height=1;a.width=1;a.style.position='absolute';a.style.top=0;a.style.left=0;a.style.border='none';a.style.visibility='hidden';document.body.appendChild(a);if('loading'!==document.readyState)c();else if(window.addEventListener)document.addEventListener('DOMContentLoaded',c);else{var e=document.onreadystatechange||function(){};document.onreadystatechange=function(b){e(b);'loading'!==document.readyState&&(document.onreadystatechange=e,c())}}}})();