Is women’s social independence a strong determinant for the reproductive health-related outcomes of the Turkish population?

preprint OA: closed CC-BY-4.0
📄 Open PDF Full text JSON View at publisher

Abstract

Abstract Introduction: There is growing recognition of the importance of women's empowerment in achieving reproductive health goals. Many studies have shown that different aspects of empowerment are associated with fertility-related outcomes and family planning practices. There is a need to measure women's empowerment at the national level with a standard tool and to evaluate its relationship with reproductive health outcomes to contribute to social policy and health services in Türkiye. The present study aimed to provide a comprehensive assessment of the relationship between women’s empowerment in terms of social independence measured by a tool validated for low- and middle-income countries and various reproductive health-related outcomes in Türkiye. Methods: This study was based on a secondary analysis of the 2018 Türkiye Demographic and Health Survey data. A total of 5,156 married women aged 15–49 was analysed. The study included eight reproductive health-related outcomes: 1) Total number of births, 2) ideal number of children, 3) having more children than desired number, 4) unplanned births, 5) demand for family planning satisfied with modern methods: 6) contraceptive use by female-only or couple methods, 7) pregnancies terminated by induced abortion, and 8) pregnancies terminated by miscarriages. The main independent variable was women’s social independence, measured by a modified form of the Social Independence domain of the Survey-based Women's Empowerment Global Index. Social independence scores were classified into quintiles lowest, lower, middle, higher, and highest. The relationship between the dependent and independent variables was explored by calculating prevalence ratios using a robust Poisson regression analysis. Prevalence ratios were adjusted by the woman’s age, place of residence, region, and household wealth categories. Results: Women in the higher social independence quintiles had consistently more favourable reproductive health outcomes for almost all variables. Compared with the highest social independence quintile, the prevalence in the lowest quintile increased 16-fold for four or more births, 1.9-fold for the desire to have four or more children, 5.7-fold for having more children than desired, 2.3-fold for unplanned births, 1.9-fold for induced abortions, and 1.7-fold for miscarriages. The study also showed that women with lower social independence were more likely to use female-only contraceptive methods rather than couple methods. Conclusion: Our findings indicate that higher social independence quintiles are strongly associated with better reproductive health outcomes. The study highlights the impact of inequalities in terms of social independence on reproductive health and the critical importance of incorporating initiatives that support women's empowerment into reproductive health policies.
Full text 15,659 characters · extracted from preprint-html · click to expand
Is women’s social independence a strong determinant for the reproductive health-related outcomes of the Turkish population? | Research Square window.SnipcartSettings = { analytics: { enabled: false } }; (function() { var accessVector = localStorage.getItem('access_vector') || ''; window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; if (accessVector) { window.dataLayer.push({ user: { profile: { profileInfo: { snid: accessVector } } } }); } })(); (function(w,d,s,l,i){w[l]=w[l]||[];w[l].push({'gtm.start':new Date().getTime(),event:'gtm.js'});var f=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0],j=d.createElement(s),dl=l!='dataLayer'?'&l='+l:'';j.async=true;j.src='https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtm.js?id='+i+dl;f.parentNode.insertBefore(j,f);})(window,document,'script','dataLayer','GTM-K279D39R'); Browse Preprints In Review Journals COVID-19 Preprints AJE Video Bytes Research Tools Research Promotion AJE Professional Editing AJE Rubriq About Preprint Platform In Review Editorial Policies Our Team Advisory Board Help Center Sign In Submit a Preprint Cite Share Download PDF Research Article Is women’s social independence a strong determinant for the reproductive health-related outcomes of the Turkish population? Raziye Özdemir, Gönül Dinç Horasan This is a preprint; it has not been peer reviewed by a journal. https://doi.org/ 10.21203/rs.3.rs-3701025/v3 This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License Status: Posted Version 3 posted You are reading this latest preprint version Show more versions Abstract Introduction: There is growing recognition of the importance of women's empowerment in achieving reproductive health goals. Many studies have shown that different aspects of empowerment are associated with fertility-related outcomes and family planning practices. There is a need to measure women's empowerment at the national level with a standard tool and to evaluate its relationship with reproductive health outcomes to contribute to social policy and health services in Türkiye. The present study aimed to provide a comprehensive assessment of the relationship between women’s empowerment in terms of social independence measured by a tool validated for low- and middle-income countries and various reproductive health-related outcomes in Türkiye. Methods: This study was based on a secondary analysis of the 2018 Türkiye Demographic and Health Survey data. A total of 5,156 married women aged 15–49 was analysed. The study included eight reproductive health-related outcomes: 1) Total number of births, 2) ideal number of children, 3) having more children than desired number, 4) unplanned births, 5) demand for family planning satisfied with modern methods: 6) contraceptive use by female-only or couple methods , 7) pregnancies terminated by induced abortion, and 8) pregnancies terminated by miscarriages. The main independent variable was women’s social independence, measured by a modified form of the Social Independence domain of the Survey-based Women's Empowerment Global Index. Social independence scores were classified into quintiles lowest, lower, middle, higher, and highest. The relationship between the dependent and independent variables was explored by calculating prevalence ratios using a robust Poisson regression analysis. Prevalence ratios were adjusted by the woman’s age, place of residence, region, and household wealth categories. Results: Women in the higher social independence quintiles had consistently more favourable reproductive health outcomes for almost all variables. Compared with the highest social independence quintile, the prevalence in the lowest quintile increased 16-fold for four or more births, 1.9-fold for the desire to have four or more children, 5.7-fold for having more children than desired, 2.3-fold for unplanned births, 1.9-fold for induced abortions, and 1.7-fold for miscarriages. The study also showed that women with lower social independence were more likely to use female-only contraceptive methods rather than couple methods. Conclusion: Our findings indicate that higher social independence quintiles are strongly associated with better reproductive health outcomes. The study highlights the impact of inequalities in terms of social independence on reproductive health and the critical importance of incorporating initiatives that support women's empowerment into reproductive health policies. Demographic health survey Reproductive health Social independence Women’s empowerment Full Text Additional Declarations The authors declare no competing interests. Supplementary Files SupplementaryMaterial.docx Cite Share Download PDF Status: Posted Version 3 posted You are reading this latest preprint version Show more versions Research Square lets you share your work early, gain feedback from the community, and start making changes to your manuscript prior to peer review in a journal. As a division of Research Square Company, we’re committed to making research communication faster, fairer, and more useful. We do this by developing innovative software and high quality services for the global research community. Our growing team is made up of researchers and industry professionals working together to solve the most critical problems facing scientific publishing. Also discoverable on Platform About Our Team In Review Editorial Policies Advisory Board Help Center Resources Author Services Accessibility API Access RSS feed Manage Cookie Preferences © Research Square 2026 | ISSN 2693-5015 (online) Privacy Policy Terms of Service Do Not Sell My Personal Information {"props":{"pageProps":{"initialData":{"identity":"rs-3701025","acceptedTermsAndConditions":true,"allowDirectSubmit":true,"archivedVersions":[],"articleType":"Research Article","associatedPublications":[],"authors":[{"id":355366933,"identity":"a84e146e-3563-4b72-b2df-d570f5fee74a","order_by":0,"name":"Raziye Özdemir","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Karabük University","correspondingAuthor":true,"prefix":"","firstName":"Raziye","middleName":"","lastName":"Özdemir","suffix":""},{"id":355366934,"identity":"87978a02-a5e9-479b-b3be-b97767819702","order_by":1,"name":"Gönül Dinç Horasan","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"İzmir University of Economics","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Gönül","middleName":"Dinç","lastName":"Horasan","suffix":""}],"badges":[],"createdAt":"2023-12-03 13:44:16","currentVersionCode":3,"declarations":{"humanSubjects":false,"vertebrateSubjects":false,"conflictsOfInterestStatement":false,"humanSubjectEthicalGuidelines":false,"humanSubjectConsent":false,"humanSubjectClinicalTrial":false,"humanSubjectCaseReport":false,"vertebrateSubjectEthicalGuidelines":false},"doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-3701025/v3","doiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-3701025/v3","draftVersion":[],"editorialEvents":[],"editorialNote":"","failedWorkflow":false,"files":[{"id":78551685,"identity":"4189dced-24d3-4a71-9f85-83a0e88e607d","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-03-14 20:02:32","extension":"pdf","order_by":1,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"manuscript-pdf","size":424750,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"Maindocument.pdf","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-3701025/v3_covered_c4eadbf6-97d8-4697-a9e7-664caaf4e457.pdf"},{"id":78551624,"identity":"30cb15ce-60e0-43f3-9303-d09959a817df","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-03-14 19:54:30","extension":"docx","order_by":1,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"supplement","size":19270,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"SupplementaryMaterial.docx","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-3701025/v3/6e37acee787a56246131e419.docx"}],"financialInterests":"The authors declare no competing interests.","formattedTitle":"Is women’s social independence a strong determinant for the reproductive health-related outcomes of the Turkish population?","fulltext":[],"fulltextSource":"","fullText":"","funders":[],"hasAdminPriorityOnWorkflow":false,"hasManuscriptDocX":false,"hasOptedInToPreprint":true,"hasPassedJournalQc":"","hasAnyPriority":false,"hideJournal":true,"highlight":"","institution":"","isAcceptedByJournal":false,"isAuthorSuppliedPdf":true,"isDeskRejected":"","isHiddenFromSearch":false,"isInQc":false,"isInWorkflow":false,"isPdf":true,"isPdfUpToDate":true,"isWithdrawnOrRetracted":false,"journal":{"display":true,"email":"[email protected]","identity":"researchsquare","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":true,"externalIdentity":"","sideBox":"","snPcode":"","submissionUrl":"/submission","title":"Research Square","twitterHandle":"researchsquare","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":false,"editorialSystem":"","reportingPortfolio":"","inReviewEnabled":false,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":true},"keywords":"Demographic health survey, Reproductive health, Social independence, Women’s empowerment","lastPublishedDoi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-3701025/v3","lastPublishedDoiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-3701025/v3","license":{"name":"CC BY 4.0","url":"https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"},"manuscriptAbstract":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eIntroduction:\u003c/strong\u003e There is growing recognition of the importance of women's empowerment in achieving reproductive health goals. Many studies have shown that different aspects of empowerment are associated with fertility-related outcomes and family planning practices. There is a need to measure women's empowerment at the national level with a standard tool and to evaluate its relationship with reproductive health outcomes to contribute to social policy and health services in Türkiye. The present study aimed to provide a comprehensive assessment of the relationship between women’s empowerment in terms of social independence measured by a tool validated for low- and middle-income countries and various reproductive health-related outcomes in Türkiye.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eMethods: \u003c/strong\u003eThis study was based on a secondary analysis of the 2018 Türkiye Demographic and Health Survey data. A total of 5,156 married women aged 15–49 was analysed. The study included eight reproductive health-related outcomes: 1) Total number of births, 2) ideal number of children, 3) having more children than desired number, 4) unplanned births, 5) demand for family planning satisfied with modern methods: 6) \u003ca href=\"https://www.un.org/development/desa/pd/sites/www.un.org.development.desa.pd/files/files/documents/2020/Jan/un_2019_contraceptiveusebymethod_databooklet.pdf\"\u003econtraceptive use by female-only or couple methods\u003c/a\u003e, 7) pregnancies terminated by induced abortion, and 8) pregnancies terminated by miscarriages. The main independent variable was women’s social independence, measured by a modified form of the Social Independence domain of the Survey-based Women's Empowerment Global Index. Social independence scores were classified into quintiles lowest, lower, middle, higher, and highest. The relationship between the dependent and independent variables was explored by calculating prevalence ratios using a robust Poisson regression analysis. Prevalence ratios were adjusted by the woman’s age, place of residence, region, and household wealth categories.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eResults: \u003c/strong\u003eWomen in the higher social independence quintiles had consistently more favourable reproductive health outcomes for almost all variables. Compared with the highest social independence quintile, the prevalence in the lowest quintile increased 16-fold for four or more births, 1.9-fold for the desire to have four or more children, 5.7-fold for having more children than desired, 2.3-fold for unplanned births, 1.9-fold for induced abortions, and 1.7-fold for miscarriages. The study also showed that women with lower social independence were more likely to use female-only contraceptive methods rather than couple methods.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eConclusion:\u003c/strong\u003e Our findings indicate that higher social independence quintiles are strongly associated with better reproductive health outcomes. The study highlights the impact of inequalities in terms of social independence on reproductive health and the critical importance of incorporating initiatives that support women's empowerment into reproductive health policies.\u003c/p\u003e","manuscriptTitle":"Is women’s social independence a strong determinant for the reproductive health-related outcomes of the Turkish population?","msid":"","msnumber":"","nonDraftVersions":[{"code":3,"date":"2025-03-14 19:46:25","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-3701025/v3","editorialEvents":[{"type":"communityComments","content":0}],"status":"published","journal":{"display":true,"email":"[email protected]","identity":"researchsquare","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":true,"externalIdentity":"","sideBox":"","snPcode":"","submissionUrl":"/submission","title":"Research Square","twitterHandle":"researchsquare","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":false,"editorialSystem":"","reportingPortfolio":"","inReviewEnabled":false,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":true}},{"code":2,"date":"2024-09-17 19:09:13","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-3701025/v2","editorialEvents":[{"type":"communityComments","content":0}],"status":"published","journal":{"display":true,"email":"[email protected]","identity":"researchsquare","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":true,"externalIdentity":"","sideBox":"","snPcode":"","submissionUrl":"/submission","title":"Research Square","twitterHandle":"researchsquare","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":false,"editorialSystem":"","reportingPortfolio":"","inReviewEnabled":false,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":true}},{"code":1,"date":"2023-12-05 09:34:47","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-3701025/v1","editorialEvents":[{"type":"communityComments","content":0}],"status":"published","journal":{"display":true,"email":"[email protected]","identity":"researchsquare","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":true,"externalIdentity":"","sideBox":"","snPcode":"","submissionUrl":"/submission","title":"Research Square","twitterHandle":"researchsquare","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":false,"editorialSystem":"","reportingPortfolio":"","inReviewEnabled":false,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":true}}],"origin":"","ownerIdentity":"a4fc7e62-9520-4920-b533-9101c1f2b02e","owner":[],"postedDate":"March 14th, 2025","published":true,"recentEditorialEvents":[],"rejectedJournal":[],"revision":"","amendment":"","status":"posted","subjectAreas":[],"tags":[],"updatedAt":"2024-06-20T03:59:31+00:00","versionOfRecord":[],"versionCreatedAt":"2025-03-14 19:46:25","video":"","vorDoi":"","vorDoiUrl":"","workflowStages":[]},"version":"v3","identity":"rs-3701025","journalConfig":"researchsquare"},"__N_SSP":true},"page":"/article/[identity]/[[...version]]","query":{"redirect":"/article/rs-3701025","identity":"rs-3701025","version":["v3"]},"buildId":"XKTyCvWXoU3ODBz1xrDgd","isFallback":false,"isExperimentalCompile":false,"dynamicIds":[84888],"gssp":true,"scriptLoader":[]}

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: preprint-html

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-05-22T02:00:06.705733+00:00
License: CC-BY-4.0