Effectiveness of Geometric Quality Control Using a Distance Evaluation Applied to an Ifsar Dem
preprint
OA: closed
CC-BY-4.0
Abstract
Abstract A new method, the Perpendicular Distance Estimation Method (PDEM), to estimate the precision of a Digital Elevation Model (DEM) with its effectiveness in the evaluation of vertical and horizontal error is presented in a previous work: when the error is accepted as random the PDEM may evaluate the vertical error, - without systematic error as it happens using the vertical distance method- and also may evaluate the horizontal one (horizontal isotropic error) under certain irregular terrain conditions, without using benchmarks. In the case of the DEM obtained by IFSAR techniques, the error in the vertical axis is correlated with the error in the range-axis. A rotation has to be done to find not correlated directions. The contribution of this paper is to assess the PDEM effectiveness to estimate the error in the three not correlated directions: the beam axis, the azimuth axis and the axis normal to the previous two (y’; the rotated range axis). Simulations are presented in detail, starting from a real reference DEM, with 100 000 points. The results confirm that the PDEM error estimation is good in the beam and in the y’ directions, and the more uneven the terrain, the better the estimate of the azimuth axis error.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Citation neighborhood (no data yet)
We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.
Source provenance
- europepmc
- last seen: 2026-05-19T01:45:01.086888+00:00
- unpaywall
- last seen: 2026-05-22T02:00:06.705733+00:00
License: CC-BY-4.0