Evaluation of Submucosal Lesions of the Large Intestine
article
OA: closed
CC0
AI-generated summary
This review evaluates the role of colonoscopy, CT colonography, transrectal ultrasonography, and MRI in characterizing large intestine submucosal lesions to aid in the identification and management of neoplasms.
One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works
Abstract
At luminal evaluation of the large intestine, any masslike protrusion that is covered by normal mucosa, whether the underlying process is intramural or extramural in origin, may be reported as a submucosal lesion. The full characterization of submucosal lesions may be difficult with optical colonoscopy alone, and endoscopic biopsy is often nondiagnostic. Cross-sectional radiologic imaging studies allow evaluation of the entire thickness of the bowel wall and surrounding tissues and often provide additional information with regard to lesion origin, internal composition, and extent of disease. Likewise, it may be difficult to distinguish submucosal lesions from mucosal polyps on radiologic images, and optical colonoscopy may provide complementary information about superficial submucosal soft-tissue lesions that are detected at computed tomographic (CT) colonography or barium imaging. Depending on the specific clinical situation, colonoscopy, CT colonography, transrectal ultrasonography, and magnetic resonance imaging all may play an important role in the diagnostic evaluation of submucosal lesions of the large intestine. It is important that radiologists be familiar with the multimodality imaging appearances of such entities so that neoplasms—especially those that are malignant—can be accurately identified and characterized and effectively managed. © RSNA, 2007
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Citation neighborhood (no data yet)
We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.
References (21)
- W63758693 via openalex
- W205138021 via openalex
- W1671617903 via openalex
- W1977040291 via openalex
- W1983080499 via openalex
- W1993840360 via openalex
- W2006622862 via openalex
- W2010584307 via openalex
- W2051323874 via openalex
- W2055640253 via openalex
- W2056482683 via openalex
- W2080484374 via openalex
- W2081892711 via openalex
- W2087115314 via openalex
- W2128988020 via openalex
- W2132060655 via openalex
- W2147753761 via openalex
- W2152236147 via openalex
- W2159356717 via openalex
- W2324939884 via openalex
- W2399585638 via openalex
Source provenance
- openalex
- last seen: 2026-06-04T00:00:01.174412+00:00
- unpaywall
- last seen: 2026-06-13T17:26:54.343160+00:00
License: CC0
· commercial use OK