AB052. SOH25_AB_140. Deep infiltrating endometriosis or locally advanced rectal cancer?—a diagnostic dilemma

In: Mesentery and Peritoneum · 2025 · vol. 9 , pp. AB052 · doi:10.21037/map-25-ab052 · W4408981037
article OA: diamond CC0
AI-generated summary by gemini-2.5-flash-lite, 2026-07-16

This case report discusses a diagnostic challenge in distinguishing deep infiltrating endometriosis from locally advanced rectal cancer in a 50-year-old female, highlighting the importance of multidisciplinary team discussions and MRI for accurate staging.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

AI-generated deep summary by claude@2026-07, 2026-07-16 · read from full text

This abstract titled “Deep infiltrating endometriosis or locally advanced rectal cancer?—a diagnostic dilemma” presents a diagnostic comparison between deep infiltrating endometriosis and locally advanced rectal cancer, but no methods, patient details, results, or diagnostic findings are included in the provided text. The only explicit details available are administrative statements (no funding, no conflicts of interest) and an open-access license description. Because the abstract content is not present here beyond the title and metadata, key outcomes and limitations cannot be determined from the supplied material. This paper is centrally about endometriosis — it addresses the diagnostic dilemma of distinguishing deep infiltrating endometriosis from locally advanced rectal cancer.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

Background: Endometriosis is a common disease in females defined as the presence of endometrial-like tissue outside the uterine cavity. Deep infiltrating endometriosis (DIE) often affects the pouch of Douglas and muscle wall of the colon and rectum. Locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) is a complex entity which requires multidisciplinary care with the widely accepted treatment strategy of neoadjuvant treatment followed by total mesorectal excision (TME). Methods: We report the case of a 50-year-old female with significant history of DIE invading the upper rectum. She presented for an outpatient endoscopy and a polypoidal lesion at the site of known DIE was suspicious for a primary rectal neoplasm. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was suggestive of LARC of the upper rectum. Thorough multidisciplinary team (MDT) discussion to discern DIE from LARC was undertaken. Results: The patient underwent an anterior resection with en bloc total abdominal hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy with covering loop ileostomy. She had an uncomplicated postoperative recovery. Postoperative histology demonstrated pT2pNibpMxR0. She proceeded to standard adjuvant chemotherapy for colorectal adenocarcinoma i.e., 6 cycles of FOLFOX (folinic acid + fluorouracil + oxaliplatin). Conclusions: We rely on imaging to establish the great majority of tumour features for therapeutic decision making in LARC. MRI is the pillar of multidisciplinary discussion for this pathology. Our case highlights how normal variant anatomy such as DIE in an age group increasingly affected by LARC can present challenges in therapeutic decision making. In the setting of progressive Total Neoadjuvant Therapy for LARC, the need for robust MDT discussions around patient selection and preoperative staging is demonstrated for best cancer care.
Full text 1,177 characters · extracted from oa-html · click to expand
AB052. SOH25_AB_140. Deep infiltrating endometriosis or locally advanced rectal cancer?—a diagnostic dilemma Acknowledgments None. Footnote Funding: None. Conflicts of Interest: The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare. Ethical Statement: The authors are accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved. Open Access Statement: This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits the non-commercial replication and distribution of the article with the strict proviso that no changes or edits are made and the original work is properly cited (including links to both the formal publication through the relevant DOI and the license). See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/. Cite this abstract as: Springael M, Edwards Murphy A, Aspell R, O’Neill A, Neary P. AB052. SOH25_AB_140. Deep infiltrating endometriosis or locally advanced rectal cancer?—a diagnostic dilemma. Mesentery Peritoneum 2025;9:AB052.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-html

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Condition tags

endometriosisdie_deep_infiltrating

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

openalex
last seen: 2026-06-10T17:14:06.276822+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK