The influence of socio-psychological factors, adverse effects of hormone therapy on the refusal of patients from its implementation or interruption of therapy after surgical treatment of ovarian endometriosis

In: Russian Bulletin of Obstetrician-Gynecologist · 2026 · vol. 26(4) , pp. 55 · doi:10.17116/rosakush20262604155 · W7204270044
article OA: closed CC0
Full text JSON View on OpenAlex View at publisher
AI-generated deep summary by qwen3.7-flash, 2026-08-29 · read from full text

This study investigates the socio-psychological factors and adverse effects of hormone therapy that lead patients to refuse or interrupt treatment following surgical intervention for ovarian endometriosis. The research highlights how emotional regulation difficulties, such as alexithymia, and side effects significantly impact medication adherence in this specific patient population. A key limitation noted is the reliance on self-reported data regarding adherence and psychological status, which may introduce bias into the findings. This paper is centrally about endometriosis — specifically focusing on post-surgical hormonal management and patient compliance issues related to ovarian lesions.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

Objective. To analyze the role of socio-psychological factors and undesirable effects of hormone therapy on the patient’s refusal to undergo it or discontinue therapy after surgical treatment for ovarian endometriosis. Materials and methods. A prospective study is presented in which the frequency of refusals of patients and the frequency of interruption of anti-relapse hormone therapy after surgical treatment for ovarian endometriosis in the gynecological department of Saratov City Clinical Hospital No. 8 during the period from 2021 to 2025 was evaluated. The study included 133 patients aged 18 to 35 years who underwent surgery for ovarian endometriosis. Combined oral contraceptives were used to prevent the recurrence of endometriosis, according to existing recommendations (ROAG Clinical Recommendations, 2024). Before starting the study, all patients had the severity of alexithymia (Toronto Alexithymia Scale), adherence to treatment (KOP-25 questionnaire), and the indicator of autonomic dysfunction syndrome according to the Wein’s questionnaire. During the first 6 months of taking the drug, patients contacted a doctor who determined the tactics of further treatment when adverse events occurred during treatment. The Statistics IBM SPSS software package for Windows, version 28.0 (Armonk, NY, IBM Corp.) is used for statistical processing of the research results. Results. The risk of adverse events of hormone therapy in the group of women over 30 years of age compared with younger age was comparable: 35.7% and 28.5% (p=0.449). In the absence of autonomic dysfunction syndrome, undesirable phenomena were reported in 18.5% of cases, and in 55.7% of cases with the syndrome (p<0.001). The incidence of complications of hormone therapy did not significantly differ in the subjects with low and high alexithymia values and amounted to 28.5% and 42.8%, respectively (p=0.116). The frequency of treatment failure for subjective and objective reasons in the group of low adherence and high alexithymia was statistically significantly higher than in the groups with high adherence and low alexithymia (p=0.030 and p=0.016, respectively). Conclusion. The presence of signs of autonomic dysfunction syndrome is a significant risk factor for the development of adverse events of anti-relapse hormone therapy. An analysis of the reasons for refusal and interruption of hormone therapy after surgery shows that they are associated with low adherence to treatment (52 units).
Full text 5,456 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
Сайт издательства «Медиа Сфера» содержит материалы, предназначенные исключительно для работников здравоохранения. Закрывая это сообщение, Вы подтверждаете, что являетесь дипломированным медицинским работником или студентом медицинского образовательного учреждения. Результаты поиска: 0 Влияние социально-психологических факторов, нежелательных явлений гормональной терапии на отказ пациенток от ее проведения или прерывание ими терапии после хирургического лечения эндометриоза яичников Журнал: Российский вестник акушера-гинеколога. 2026;26(4): 55‑61 Прочитано: 51 раз Как цитировать: Литература / References: - Vannuccini S, Clemenza S, Rossi M, Petraglia F. Hormonal treatments for endometriosis: The endocrine background. Rev Endocr Metab Disord. 2022;23:3:333-355. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11154-021-09666-w - Thiel PS, Donders F, Kobylianskii A, Maheux-Lacroix S, Matelski J, Walsh C, Murji A. The effect of hormonal treatment on ovarian endometriomas: A Systematic review and meta-analysis. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2024;31:4:273-279. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmig.2024.01.002 - Клинические рекомендации. Эндометриоз. 2024. Текст: электронный. Министерство здравоохранения Российской Федерации. https://cr.minzdrav.gov.ru/previewcr/259_2?ysclid=majofx5pom443522794 - Chen I, Veth VB, Choudhry AJ, Murji A, Zakhari A, Black AY, Agarpao C, Maas JW. Pre- and postsurgical medical therapy for endometriosis surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020;11:11:CD003678. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD003678.pub3 - Mitchell JB, Chetty S, Kathrada F. Progestins in the symptomatic management of endometriosis: a meta-analysis on their effectiveness and safety. BMC Womens Health. 2022;22:1:526. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12905-022-02122-0 - Zakhari A, Delpero E, McKeown S, Tomlinson G, Bougie O, Murji A. Endometriosis recurrence following post-operative hormonal suppression: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod Update. 2021;27:1:96-107. https://doi.org/10.1093/humupd/dmaa033 - de Souza Pinto LP, Ferrari G, Dos Santos IK, de Mello Roesler CR, de Mello Gindri I. Evaluation of safety and effectiveness of gestrinone in the treatment of endometriosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2023;307:1:21-37. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-022-06846-0 - Лукина Ю.В., Кутишенко Н.П., Марцевич С.Ю., Драпкина О.М. Проблемные вопросы и разработка классификаций основных параметров качества и приверженности фармакотерапии. Часть I: приверженность пациентов к лечению. Кардиоваскулярная терапия и профилактика. 2023;22:86-94. - Jose M, Rajmohan P, Sulfath TS, Varma RP, Mohan M, Jose NK, Cherian JJ, Bairwa ML, Goswamy T, Apte A, Kuttichira P, Thomas J. Medication adherence scales in non-communicable diseases: A scoping review of design gaps, constructs and validation processes. PLoS One. 2025;20:5:e0321423. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0321423 - Garner JB. Problems of nonadherence in cardiology and proposals to improve outcomes. Am J Cardiol. 2010;105:1495-501. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjcard.2009.12.077 - Потемкина Е.А. Особенности алекситимии у пациентов с хроническими гинекологическими заболеваниями. Сибирский психологический журнал. 2010;35:38-39. https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/osobennosti-aleksitimii-u-patsientov-s-hronicheskimi-ginekologicheskimi-zabolevaniyami - Peltier AC. Autonomic dysfunction from diagnosis to treatment. Prim Care. 2024;51:2:359-373. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pop.2024.02.006 - Kaur D, Tiwana H, Stino A, Sandroni P. Autonomic neuropathies. Muscle Nerve. 2021;63:1:10-21. https://doi.org/10.1002/mus.27048 - Preece DA, Mehta A, Petrova K, Sikka P, Bjureberg J, Becerra R, Gross JJ. Alexithymia and emotion regulation. J Affect Disord. 2023;324:232-238. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2022.12.065 - Чутко Л.С., Корнишина Т.Л., Сурушкина С.Ю., Яковенко Е.А., Анисимова Т.И., Волов М.Б. Синдром вегетативной дисфункции у детей и подростков. Журнал неврологии и психиатрии им. С.С. Корсакова. 2018;118:1:43-49. - Головатюк А.О., Полуэктов М.Г. Расстройства деятельности вегетативной нервной системы в клинической практике. Терапия. 2024;10:1:168-174. https://doi.org/10.18565/therapy.2024.1.168-174 - Старостина Е.Г., Тэйлор Г.Д., Квилти Л.К., Бобров А.Е., Мошняга Е.Н., Пузырева Н.В., Боброва М.А., Ивашкина М.Г., Кривчикова М.Н., Шаврикова Е.П., Бэгби М. Торонтская шкала алекситимии (20 пунктов): валидизация русскоязычной версии на выборке терапевтических больных. Социальная и клиническая психиатрия. 2010;20:4: 31-38. - Schroeders U, Kubera F, Gnambs T. The Structure of the Toronto Alexithymia Scale (TAS-20): A Meta-analytic confirmatory factor analysis. Assessment. 2022;29:8:1806-1823. https://doi.org/10.1177/10731911211033894 - Николаев Н.А., Скирденко Ю.П. Российский универсальный опросник количественной оценки приверженности к лечению (КОП-25). Клиническая фармакология и терапия. 2018;27:1:74-78. - Вейн А.М. Вегетативные расстройства: Клиника, диагностика, лечение. М.: Медицинское информационное агентство. 2003;53-84. Подтверждение e-mail На [email protected] отправлено письмо со ссылкой для подтверждения e-mail. Перейдите по ссылке из письма, чтобы завершить регистрацию на сайте. Подтверждение e-mail Мы используем файлы cооkies для улучшения работы сайта. Оставаясь на нашем сайте, вы соглашаетесь с условиями использования файлов cооkies. Чтобы ознакомиться с нашими Положениями о конфиденциальности и об использовании файлов cookie, нажмите здесь.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (sparse)

Too few in-corpus citations on either side for a chart; here are the lists.

Cites (4)

References (15)

Source provenance

openalex
last seen: 2026-09-01T06:03:46.080381+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-09-01T06:29:04.589233+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK