Mechanisms and Safety of Ultrasound Phacoemulsification

preprint OA: closed
📄 Open PDF Full text JSON View at publisher

Abstract

Objective A comprehensive technical and biomedical analysis of ultrasound-induced effects during phacoemulsification cataract surgery (PCS) and an assessment of the potential risks associated with ultrasound emulsification Methods Modeling ultrasound wave propagation and intensities using the finite element method (FEM). Cavitation onset was experimentally validated in a pressure chamber observed with a high-speed camera. The thermal effects of ultrasound energy were estimated through established physical and thermal models and confirmed in a cuvette setup using thermistor probes. Results At the distal end of the PCS tip, the ultrasound wave intensity reached 0.2 W/mm 2 , resulting in ocular tissue displacements in the anterior chamber below 2 µm. The temperature rise in the anterior chamber was less than 0.2 °C/s. Both observations indicate negligible mechanical and thermal risk to ocular tissues. High-speed imaging confirmed cavitation confined to the tip region. Emulsification efficacy was maintained even under conditions that suppressed cavitation, including elevated ambient pressures and cavitation-inhibiting fluids. Results indicate that mechanical fragmentation by tip oscillation (“jackhammer effect”) is the only relevant emulsification mechanism, while cavitation plays a negligible role. Acoustic streaming was observed during ultrasound excitation without phaco sleeve. During phacoemulsification, the sleeve suppressed acoustic streaming into the anterior chamber. Conclusions The findings validate the safety of ultrasound-based PCS and confirm that tissue fragmentation is primarily driven by the oscillating tip’s direct action.
Full text 2,635 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · 4 sections · click to expand

Abstract

Objective A comprehensive technical and biomedical analysis of ultrasound-induced effects during phacoemulsification cataract surgery (PCS) and an assessment of the potential risks associated with ultrasound emulsification

Methods

Modeling ultrasound wave propagation and intensities using the finite element method (FEM). Cavitation onset was experimentally validated in a pressure chamber observed with a high-speed camera. The thermal effects of ultrasound energy were estimated through established physical and thermal models and confirmed in a cuvette setup using thermistor probes.

Results

At the distal end of the PCS tip, the ultrasound wave intensity reached 0.2 W/mm2, resulting in ocular tissue displacements in the anterior chamber below 2 µm. The temperature rise in the anterior chamber was less than 0.2 °C/s. Both observations indicate negligible mechanical and thermal risk to ocular tissues. High-speed imaging confirmed cavitation confined to the tip region. Emulsification efficacy was maintained even under conditions that suppressed cavitation, including elevated ambient pressures and cavitation-inhibiting fluids. Results indicate that mechanical fragmentation by tip oscillation (“jackhammer effect”) is the only relevant emulsification mechanism, while cavitation plays a negligible role. Acoustic streaming was observed during ultrasound excitation without phaco sleeve. During phacoemulsification, the sleeve suppressed acoustic streaming into the anterior chamber.

Conclusions

The findings validate the safety of ultrasound-based PCS and confirm that tissue fragmentation is primarily driven by the oscillating tip’s direct action. Competing Interest Statement Financial Support: This study has been supported by Innosuisse (Grant 41144.1 IP-LS). This funding organization had no role in the design or conduct of this research. Conflict of Interest: The Innosuisse research project (Grant 41144.1 IP-LS) was carried out in collaboration with Oertli Instruments (Berneck, Switzerland). Footnotes Financial Support: This study has been supported by Innosuisse (Grant 41144.1 IP-LS). This funding organization had no role in the design or conduct of this research. Conflict of Interest: The Innosuisse research project (Grant 41144.1 IP-LS) was carried out in collaboration with Oertli Instruments (Berneck, Switzerland). Abbreviations - AAO - American Academy of Ophthalmology - EPR - Electron-Paramagnetic Resonance - ESCRS - European Society of Cataract & Refractive Surgeons - FEM - Finite Element Method - FLACS - Femtolaser Assisted Cataract Surgery - PCS - Phacoemulsification Cataract Surgery

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-08-05T06:45:03.150373+00:00