Effect of Lottery Incentives on Study Protocol Adherence in the AZ-HEROES Study - A Retrospective Cohort Study

preprint OA: closed
🔓 Open OA copy View at publisher
AI-generated summary by claude@2026-07, 2026-07-15

Implementation of $50 and $100 lottery incentives significantly increased study adherence among participants in the AZ-HEROES cohort study.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

Background: Various monetary incentive strategies have been used to increase participant adherence in research. Our study examined the impact of two lottery incentive amounts on study adherence.Aims/objectives: The objective of this paper was to quantify the impact of a $50 and $100 lottery incentive on adherence to weekly study activities among AZ HEROES participants.Methods: The AZ HEROES study was a prospective cohort study examining COVID-19 infections among Arizona frontline workers. Participants submitted weekly nasal swabs to detect COVID-19 infections and completed surveys. To increase adherence, a $50 lottery was implemented with random winners selected each week among those fully adherent over 4 weeks, and later increased to $100. Mixed effects logistic regression modelled the association between lottery implementation and adherence.Results: After adjusting for enrollment date, baseline adherence, sex, age, household income, COVID-19 result, and occupation, the odds of adherence after the $50 lottery implementation were 1.53 (95% CI: 1.29, 1.83) and after the $100 lottery implementation were 1.79 (95% CI: 1.48, 2.17) times the odds before the lottery.Conclusion: After adjustment, adherence increased post implementation of the $50 and $100 lotteries. These findings suggest that a lottery incentive may increase participant adherence, and further research is warranted.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-19T01:45:01.086888+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-08-02T06:40:33.490260+00:00