Feeding Intelligence: Comparative Evaluation of ChatGPT and Clinical Guidelines for Nutritional Management in Head and Neck Cancer | Research Square window.SnipcartSettings = { analytics: { enabled: false } }; (function() { var accessVector = localStorage.getItem('access_vector') || ''; window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; if (accessVector) { window.dataLayer.push({ user: { profile: { profileInfo: { snid: accessVector } } } }); } })(); (function(w,d,s,l,i){w[l]=w[l]||[];w[l].push({'gtm.start':new Date().getTime(),event:'gtm.js'});var f=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0],j=d.createElement(s),dl=l!='dataLayer'?'&l='+l:'';j.async=true;j.src='https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtm.js?id='+i+dl;f.parentNode.insertBefore(j,f);})(window,document,'script','dataLayer','GTM-K279D39R'); Browse Preprints In Review Journals COVID-19 Preprints AJE Video Bytes Research Tools Research Promotion AJE Professional Editing AJE Rubriq About Preprint Platform In Review Editorial Policies Our Team Advisory Board Help Center Sign In Submit a Preprint Cite Share Download PDF Research Article Feeding Intelligence: Comparative Evaluation of ChatGPT and Clinical Guidelines for Nutritional Management in Head and Neck Cancer Shasha Shen, Kai Zhou, Mingna Wu, Dahai Liu, Xiaotong Shen, Peijie Li, and 3 more This is a preprint; it has not been peer reviewed by a journal. https://doi.org/ 10.21203/rs.3.rs-7393011/v1 This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License Status: Published Journal Publication published 21 Nov, 2025 Read the published version in Journal of Translational Medicine → Version 1 posted 4 You are reading this latest preprint version Abstract Background Artificial intelligence (AI) tools such as ChatGPT are increasingly applied in digital health and patient education, yet their alignment with established clinical guidelines for cancer-related nutritional management remains unclear. Objective This study aimed to evaluate the concordance, functional characteristics, patient accessibility, and innovation of ChatGPT-generated nutritional recommendations compared with clinical guidelines from the Chinese Society of Clinical Oncology (CSCO), Chinese Nutrition Society (CNS), and European Society for Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism (ESPEN). Methods We analyzed ChatGPT responses across six key nutrition-related issues—anorexia/cachexia, dysphagia, oral mucositis, unintentional weight loss, gastrointestinal intolerance, and nutritional monitoring—and compared them with guideline recommendations. Expert evaluation (n = 5), readability metrics, semantic similarity (TF-IDF), and patient-centered assessments were conducted to compare personalization, innovation, clinical feasibility, evidence-based support, population applicability, clarity, and self-management guidance. Results ChatGPT recommendations aligned with at least one guideline in 50.0–64.3% of cases, highest for dysphagia (64.3%), and included general strategies such as small frequent meals, texture modification, hydration, and high-protein/high-calorie intake. ChatGPT-specific suggestions (8.3–18.2%) focused on lifestyle and behavioral interventions, including mindful eating, music therapy, and wearable diet trackers. Expert ratings indicated higher personalization (4.3/5) and innovation (4.6/5) for ChatGPT, whereas guidelines scored higher for clinical feasibility (4.7/5), evidence-based support (4.9/5), and population applicability (4.8/5). ChatGPT exhibited superior patient-centered performance in clarity (4.5 vs 3.2) and self-management guidance (4.6 vs 3.0) and demonstrated more concise, readable content (Flesch–Kincaid grade 12.9–14.2) compared with guidelines (17.9–20.5). Semantic analysis revealed moderate overlap with CSCO (≈ 0.63) and CNS (≈ 0.59), and lower similarity with ESPEN (≈ 0.47), highlighting ChatGPT’s use of patient-friendly language. Topic modeling identified three clusters: patient support and accessibility (ChatGPT), technical nutrition therapy (ESPEN/CSCO), and nutritional assessment and monitoring (CNS). Conclusions ChatGPT provides personalized, innovative, and patient-accessible nutritional guidance for cancer-related malnutrition, complementing traditional clinical guidelines. While guidelines remain essential for evidence-based decision-making, AI tools may enhance patient education, engagement, and self-management in digital health applications. ChatGPT cancer nutrition management digital health patient education AI-assisted guidance Full Text Cite Share Download PDF Status: Published Journal Publication published 21 Nov, 2025 Read the published version in Journal of Translational Medicine → Version 1 posted Reviewers agreed at journal 29 Aug, 2025 Reviewers invited by journal 29 Aug, 2025 Editor assigned by journal 21 Aug, 2025 First submitted to journal 17 Aug, 2025 You are reading this latest preprint version Research Square lets you share your work early, gain feedback from the community, and start making changes to your manuscript prior to peer review in a journal. As a division of Research Square Company, we’re committed to making research communication faster, fairer, and more useful. We do this by developing innovative software and high quality services for the global research community. Our growing team is made up of researchers and industry professionals working together to solve the most critical problems facing scientific publishing. Also discoverable on Platform About Our Team In Review Editorial Policies Advisory Board Help Center Resources Author Services Accessibility API Access RSS feed Manage Cookie Preferences © Research Square 2026 | ISSN 2693-5015 (online) Privacy Policy Terms of Service Do Not Sell My Personal Information {"props":{"pageProps":{"initialData":{"identity":"rs-7393011","acceptedTermsAndConditions":true,"allowDirectSubmit":false,"archivedVersions":[],"articleType":"Research Article","associatedPublications":[],"authors":[{"id":507362858,"identity":"1758872d-2663-4774-94d3-bfad63daae8c","order_by":0,"name":"Shasha Shen","email":"","orcid":"https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9987-0801","institution":"The Second Affiliated Hospital of Zunyi Medical University","correspondingAuthor":true,"prefix":"","firstName":"Shasha","middleName":"","lastName":"Shen","suffix":""},{"id":507362859,"identity":"7132c789-8d95-4bda-8e82-3e8faa37c859","order_by":1,"name":"Kai Zhou","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"The Second Affiliated Hospital of Zunyi Medical University","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Kai","middleName":"","lastName":"Zhou","suffix":""},{"id":507362860,"identity":"82ef3051-3cb1-460f-8a04-4e2ce47cf72e","order_by":2,"name":"Mingna Wu","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"The Second Affiliated Hospital of Zunyi Medical University","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Mingna","middleName":"","lastName":"Wu","suffix":""},{"id":507362861,"identity":"6774b928-4a12-469d-8940-9953101d9ae7","order_by":3,"name":"Dahai Liu","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"The Second Affiliated Hospital of Zunyi Medical University","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Dahai","middleName":"","lastName":"Liu","suffix":""},{"id":507362862,"identity":"82cda7da-b29d-4b32-9808-544168ec2af8","order_by":4,"name":"Xiaotong Shen","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"The Second Affiliated Hospital of Zunyi Medical University","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Xiaotong","middleName":"","lastName":"Shen","suffix":""},{"id":507362863,"identity":"418f016d-990f-4fd8-9f09-5f58a43d3fd7","order_by":5,"name":"Peijie Li","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"The Second Affiliated Hospital of Zunyi Medical University","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Peijie","middleName":"","lastName":"Li","suffix":""},{"id":507362864,"identity":"1522ce8a-6cc5-4f59-8aae-f9f4c7f3b824","order_by":6,"name":"Ying Xu","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"The Second Affiliated Hospital of Zunyi Medical University","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Ying","middleName":"","lastName":"Xu","suffix":""},{"id":507362865,"identity":"be6709d4-aefc-4cb3-ae91-affd68914651","order_by":7,"name":"Sijia Zheng","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"The Second Affiliated Hospital of Zunyi Medical University","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Sijia","middleName":"","lastName":"Zheng","suffix":""},{"id":507362866,"identity":"ceac762a-3c99-4ffb-a095-e2dcc20f69e3","order_by":8,"name":"Xiaoxia Gou","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"The Second Affiliated Hospital of Zunyi Medical University","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Xiaoxia","middleName":"","lastName":"Gou","suffix":""}],"badges":[],"createdAt":"2025-08-17 14:44:55","currentVersionCode":1,"declarations":"","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-7393011/v1","doiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-7393011/v1","draftVersion":[],"editorialEvents":[{"content":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12967-025-07477-0","type":"published","date":"2025-11-21T15:56:57+00:00"}],"editorialNote":"","failedWorkflow":false,"files":[{"id":96650151,"identity":"6457c8cd-3867-4210-bf8f-9e7d46d95209","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-11-24 16:08:46","extension":"pdf","order_by":1,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"manuscript-pdf","size":1052132,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"MS.pdf","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-7393011/v1_covered_4599cffb-cb92-4944-b01a-49edce97c589.pdf"}],"financialInterests":"","formattedTitle":"Feeding Intelligence: Comparative Evaluation of ChatGPT and Clinical Guidelines for Nutritional Management in Head and Neck Cancer","fulltext":[],"fulltextSource":"","fullText":"","funders":[],"hasAdminPriorityOnWorkflow":false,"hasManuscriptDocX":false,"hasOptedInToPreprint":true,"hasPassedJournalQc":"","hasAnyPriority":false,"hideJournal":false,"highlight":"","institution":"","isAcceptedByJournal":true,"isAuthorSuppliedPdf":true,"isDeskRejected":"","isHiddenFromSearch":false,"isInQc":false,"isInWorkflow":true,"isPdf":true,"isPdfUpToDate":true,"isWithdrawnOrRetracted":false,"journal":{"display":true,"email":"
[email protected]","identity":"journal-of-translational-medicine","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":false,"externalIdentity":"jtrm","sideBox":"Learn more about [Journal of Translational Medicine](http://translational-medicine.biomedcentral.com)","snPcode":"","submissionUrl":"https://www.editorialmanager.com/jtrm/default.aspx","title":"Journal of Translational Medicine","twitterHandle":"@BioMedCentral","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":true,"editorialSystem":"em","reportingPortfolio":"BMC/SO AJ","inReviewEnabled":true,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":true},"keywords":"ChatGPT, cancer, nutrition management, digital health, patient education, AI-assisted guidance","lastPublishedDoi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-7393011/v1","lastPublishedDoiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-7393011/v1","license":{"name":"CC BY 4.0","url":"https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"},"manuscriptAbstract":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eBackground\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eArtificial intelligence (AI) tools such as ChatGPT are increasingly applied in digital health and patient education, yet their alignment with established clinical guidelines for cancer-related nutritional management remains unclear.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eObjective\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThis study aimed to evaluate the concordance, functional characteristics, patient accessibility, and innovation of ChatGPT-generated nutritional recommendations compared with clinical guidelines from the Chinese Society of Clinical Oncology (CSCO), Chinese Nutrition Society (CNS), and European Society for Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism (ESPEN).\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eMethods\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eWe analyzed ChatGPT responses across six key nutrition-related issues—anorexia/cachexia, dysphagia, oral mucositis, unintentional weight loss, gastrointestinal intolerance, and nutritional monitoring—and compared them with guideline recommendations. Expert evaluation (n = 5), readability metrics, semantic similarity (TF-IDF), and patient-centered assessments were conducted to compare personalization, innovation, clinical feasibility, evidence-based support, population applicability, clarity, and self-management guidance.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eResults\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eChatGPT recommendations aligned with at least one guideline in 50.0–64.3% of cases, highest for dysphagia (64.3%), and included general strategies such as small frequent meals, texture modification, hydration, and high-protein/high-calorie intake. ChatGPT-specific suggestions (8.3–18.2%) focused on lifestyle and behavioral interventions, including mindful eating, music therapy, and wearable diet trackers. Expert ratings indicated higher personalization (4.3/5) and innovation (4.6/5) for ChatGPT, whereas guidelines scored higher for clinical feasibility (4.7/5), evidence-based support (4.9/5), and population applicability (4.8/5). ChatGPT exhibited superior patient-centered performance in clarity (4.5 vs 3.2) and self-management guidance (4.6 vs 3.0) and demonstrated more concise, readable content (Flesch–Kincaid grade 12.9–14.2) compared with guidelines (17.9–20.5). Semantic analysis revealed moderate overlap with CSCO (≈ 0.63) and CNS (≈ 0.59), and lower similarity with ESPEN (≈ 0.47), highlighting ChatGPT’s use of patient-friendly language. Topic modeling identified three clusters: patient support and accessibility (ChatGPT), technical nutrition therapy (ESPEN/CSCO), and nutritional assessment and monitoring (CNS).\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eConclusions\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eChatGPT provides personalized, innovative, and patient-accessible nutritional guidance for cancer-related malnutrition, complementing traditional clinical guidelines. While guidelines remain essential for evidence-based decision-making, AI tools may enhance patient education, engagement, and self-management in digital health applications.\u003c/p\u003e","manuscriptTitle":"Feeding Intelligence: Comparative Evaluation of ChatGPT and Clinical Guidelines for Nutritional Management in Head and Neck Cancer","msid":"","msnumber":"","nonDraftVersions":[{"code":1,"date":"2025-09-05 13:24:00","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-7393011/v1","editorialEvents":[{"type":"communityComments","content":0},{"type":"reviewerAgreed","content":"","date":"2025-08-29T11:06:22+00:00","index":0,"fulltext":""},{"type":"reviewersInvited","content":"","date":"2025-08-29T09:33:34+00:00","index":"","fulltext":""},{"type":"editorAssigned","content":"","date":"2025-08-21T14:44:31+00:00","index":"","fulltext":""},{"type":"submitted","content":"Journal of Translational Medicine","date":"2025-08-17T10:44:07+00:00","index":"","fulltext":""}],"status":"published","journal":{"display":true,"email":"
[email protected]","identity":"journal-of-translational-medicine","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":false,"externalIdentity":"jtrm","sideBox":"Learn more about [Journal of Translational Medicine](http://translational-medicine.biomedcentral.com)","snPcode":"","submissionUrl":"https://www.editorialmanager.com/jtrm/default.aspx","title":"Journal of Translational Medicine","twitterHandle":"@BioMedCentral","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":true,"editorialSystem":"em","reportingPortfolio":"BMC/SO AJ","inReviewEnabled":true,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":true}}],"origin":"","ownerIdentity":"41d4ee00-40ba-4a21-93ce-ea79986bc1d8","owner":[],"postedDate":"September 5th, 2025","published":true,"recentEditorialEvents":[],"rejectedJournal":[],"revision":"","amendment":"","status":"published-in-journal","subjectAreas":[],"tags":[],"updatedAt":"2025-11-24T16:02:12+00:00","versionOfRecord":{"articleIdentity":"rs-7393011","link":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12967-025-07477-0","journal":{"identity":"journal-of-translational-medicine","isVorOnly":false,"title":"Journal of Translational Medicine"},"publishedOn":"2025-11-21 15:56:57","publishedOnDateReadable":"November 21st, 2025"},"versionCreatedAt":"2025-09-05 13:24:00","video":"","vorDoi":"10.1186/s12967-025-07477-0","vorDoiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12967-025-07477-0","workflowStages":[]},"version":"v1","identity":"rs-7393011","journalConfig":"researchsquare"},"__N_SSP":true},"page":"/article/[identity]/[[...version]]","query":{"redirect":"/article/rs-7393011","identity":"rs-7393011","version":["v1"]},"buildId":"XKTyCvWXoU3ODBz1xrDgd","isFallback":false,"isExperimentalCompile":false,"dynamicIds":[84888],"gssp":true,"scriptLoader":[]}
Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below.
Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure
cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can
have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy
(via DOI)
is the canonical version.