Injection practices in 2011-2015: A rapid review using data from the Demographic and Health Surveys (DHS)

preprint OA: closed CC-BY-4.0
📄 Open PDF View at publisher

Abstract

Background Reuse of injection devices to give healthcare injections decreased from 39.8% to 5.5% between 2000 and 2010, but trends since 2011 have not been described. We reviewed results of Demographic and Health Surveys (DHS) to describe injection practices worldwide from 2011 to 2015. Methods We searched the DHS Internet site for data published on injection practices conducted in countries from 2011 to 2015, extracted information on frequency (number of healthcare injections per person in the last 12 months) and safety (proportion of syringes and needles taken from a new, unopened package). We compared gender groups and WHO regions in terms of frequency and safety. For countries with data available, we compared injection practices 2004- 2010 and 2011-2015. Results Since 2011, 40 of 92 countries (43%) that had DHS surveys reported on injection practices. On average, the frequency of injection was 1.64 per person per year (from 3.84 in WHO Eastern Mediterranean region to 1.18 in WHO African region). Among those, 96.1% of injections reportedly used new injection devices (from 90.2% in the WHO Eastern Mediterranean region to 98.8% in the WHO Western Pacific region). On average, women received more injections per year (1.85) than men (1.41). Among 16 (40%) countries with data up to 2010 and since 2011, 69% improved in terms of safety. The annual number of unsafe injections was reduced in 81% of countries, with the notable exception of Pakistan where the number of unsafe injections was the highest and did not decrease between 2006 and 2012. Conclusion Injection practices have continued to improve in most countries worldwide, although the Eastern Mediterranean region in particular is facing residual unsafe practices that are not improving. Further efforts are needed to completely eliminate unsafe injection practices in health care settings, including through the use of reuse-prevention devices. Despite some limitations, DHS is an easily available method to measure progress over time.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-19T01:45:01.086888+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-05-22T02:00:06.705733+00:00
License: CC-BY-4.0