A phenomenological analysis of the emotional experiences of graduate preservice student teachers in Indonesia

A phenomenological analysis of the emotional... | F1000Research "use strict";function _typeof(t){return(_typeof="function"==typeof Symbol&&"symbol"==typeof Symbol.iterator?function(t){return typeof t}:function(t){return t&&"function"==typeof Symbol&&t.constructor===Symbol&&t!==Symbol.prototype?"symbol":typeof t})(t)}!function(){var t=function(){var t,e,o=[],n=window,r=n;for(;r;){try{if(r.frames.__tcfapiLocator){t=r;break}}catch(t){}if(r===n.top)break;r=r.parent}t||(!function t(){var e=n.document,o=!!n.frames.__tcfapiLocator;if(!o)if(e.body){var r=e.createElement("iframe");r.style.cssText="display:none",r.name="__tcfapiLocator",e.body.appendChild(r)}else setTimeout(t,5);return!o}(),n.__tcfapi=function(){for(var t=arguments.length,n=new Array(t),r=0;r 3&&2===parseInt(n[1],10)&&"boolean"==typeof n[3]&&(e=n[3],"function"==typeof n[2]&&n[2]("set",!0)):"ping"===n[0]?"function"==typeof n[2]&&n[2]({gdprApplies:e,cmpLoaded:!1,cmpStatus:"stub"}):o.push(n)},n.addEventListener("message",(function(t){var e="string"==typeof t.data,o={};if(e)try{o=JSON.parse(t.data)}catch(t){}else o=t.data;var n="object"===_typeof(o)&&null!==o?o.__tcfapiCall:null;n&&window.__tcfapi(n.command,n.version,(function(o,r){var a={__tcfapiReturn:{returnValue:o,success:r,callId:n.callId}};t&&t.source&&t.source.postMessage&&t.source.postMessage(e?JSON.stringify(a):a,"*")}),n.parameter)}),!1))};"undefined"!=typeof module?module.exports=t:t()}(); dataLayer = dataLayer || []; // Standard GTM initialization - Google Consent Mode handles consent automatically (function(w,d,s,l,i){w[l]=w[l]||[];w[l].push({'gtm.start': new Date().getTime(),event:'gtm.js'});var f=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0], j=d.createElement(s),dl=l!='dataLayer'?'&l='+l:'';j.async=true;j.src= 'https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtm.js?id='+i+dl+ '>m_auth=hzk0Vc3qFsQYhCrIoHz68A>m_preview=env-1>m_cookies_win=x';f.parentNode.insertBefore(j,f); })(window,document,'script','dataLayer','GTM-MWFK8L5J'); ;window.NREUM||(NREUM={});NREUM.init={distributed_tracing:{enabled:true},privacy:{cookies_enabled:true},ajax:{deny_list:["bam.nr-data.net"]}}; ;NREUM.loader_config={accountID:"438030",trustKey:"438030",agentID:"772317073",licenseKey:"97f8f67f26",applicationID:"772317073"} ;NREUM.info={beacon:"bam.nr-data.net",errorBeacon:"bam.nr-data.net",licenseKey:"97f8f67f26",applicationID:"772317073",sa:1} ;/*! For license information please see nr-loader-spa-1.236.0.min.js.LICENSE.txt */ (()=>{"use strict";var e,t,r={5763:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{P_:()=>l,Mt:()=>g,C5:()=>s,DL:()=>v,OP:()=>T,lF:()=>D,Yu:()=>y,Dg:()=>h,CX:()=>c,GE:()=>b,sU:()=>_});var n=r(8632),i=r(9567);const o={beacon:n.ce.beacon,errorBeacon:n.ce.errorBeacon,licenseKey:void 0,applicationID:void 0,sa:void 0,queueTime:void 0,applicationTime:void 0,ttGuid:void 0,user:void 0,account:void 0,product:void 0,extra:void 0,jsAttributes:{},userAttributes:void 0,atts:void 0,transactionName:void 0,tNamePlain:void 0},a={};function s(e){if(!e)throw new Error("All info objects require an agent identifier!");if(!a[e])throw new Error("Info for ".concat(e," was never set"));return a[e]}function c(e,t){if(!e)throw new Error("All info objects require an agent identifier!");a[e]=(0,i.D)(t,o),(0,n.Qy)(e,a[e],"info")}var u=r(7056);const d=()=>{const e={blockSelector:"[data-nr-block]",maskInputOptions:{password:!0}};return{allow_bfcache:!0,privacy:{cookies_enabled:!0},ajax:{deny_list:void 0,enabled:!0,harvestTimeSeconds:10},distributed_tracing:{enabled:void 0,exclude_newrelic_header:void 0,cors_use_newrelic_header:void 0,cors_use_tracecontext_headers:void 0,allowed_origins:void 0},session:{domain:void 0,expiresMs:u.oD,inactiveMs:u.Hb},ssl:void 0,obfuscate:void 0,jserrors:{enabled:!0,harvestTimeSeconds:10},metrics:{enabled:!0},page_action:{enabled:!0,harvestTimeSeconds:30},page_view_event:{enabled:!0},page_view_timing:{enabled:!0,harvestTimeSeconds:30,long_task:!1},session_trace:{enabled:!0,harvestTimeSeconds:10},harvest:{tooManyRequestsDelay:60},session_replay:{enabled:!1,harvestTimeSeconds:60,sampleRate:.1,errorSampleRate:.1,maskTextSelector:"*",maskAllInputs:!0,get blockClass(){return"nr-block"},get ignoreClass(){return"nr-ignore"},get maskTextClass(){return"nr-mask"},get blockSelector(){return e.blockSelector},set blockSelector(t){e.blockSelector+=",".concat(t)},get maskInputOptions(){return e.maskInputOptions},set maskInputOptions(t){e.maskInputOptions={...t,password:!0}}},spa:{enabled:!0,harvestTimeSeconds:10}}},f={};function l(e){if(!e)throw new Error("All configuration objects require an agent identifier!");if(!f[e])throw new Error("Configuration for ".concat(e," was never set"));return f[e]}function h(e,t){if(!e)throw new Error("All configuration objects require an agent identifier!");f[e]=(0,i.D)(t,d()),(0,n.Qy)(e,f[e],"config")}function g(e,t){if(!e)throw new Error("All configuration objects require an agent identifier!");var r=l(e);if(r){for(var n=t.split("."),i=0;i {r.d(t,{D:()=>i});var n=r(50);function i(e,t){try{if(!e||"object"!=typeof e)return(0,n.Z)("Setting a Configurable requires an object as input");if(!t||"object"!=typeof t)return(0,n.Z)("Setting a Configurable requires a model to set its initial properties");const r=Object.create(Object.getPrototypeOf(t),Object.getOwnPropertyDescriptors(t)),o=0===Object.keys(r).length?e:r;for(let a in o)if(void 0!==e[a])try{"object"==typeof e[a]&&"object"==typeof t[a]?r[a]=i(e[a],t[a]):r[a]=e[a]}catch(e){(0,n.Z)("An error occurred while setting a property of a Configurable",e)}return r}catch(e){(0,n.Z)("An error occured while setting a Configurable",e)}}},6818:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{Re:()=>i,gF:()=>o,q4:()=>n});const n="1.236.0",i="PROD",o="CDN"},385:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{FN:()=>a,IF:()=>u,Nk:()=>f,Tt:()=>s,_A:()=>o,il:()=>n,pL:()=>c,v6:()=>i,w1:()=>d});const n="undefined"!=typeof window&&!!window.document,i="undefined"!=typeof WorkerGlobalScope&&("undefined"!=typeof self&&self instanceof WorkerGlobalScope&&self.navigator instanceof WorkerNavigator||"undefined"!=typeof globalThis&&globalThis instanceof WorkerGlobalScope&&globalThis.navigator instanceof WorkerNavigator),o=n?window:"undefined"!=typeof WorkerGlobalScope&&("undefined"!=typeof self&&self instanceof WorkerGlobalScope&&self||"undefined"!=typeof globalThis&&globalThis instanceof WorkerGlobalScope&&globalThis),a=""+o?.location,s=/iPad|iPhone|iPod/.test(navigator.userAgent),c=s&&"undefined"==typeof SharedWorker,u=(()=>{const e=navigator.userAgent.match(/Firefox[/\s](\d+\.\d+)/);return Array.isArray(e)&&e.length>=2?+e[1]:0})(),d=Boolean(n&&window.document.documentMode),f=!!navigator.sendBeacon},1117:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{w:()=>o});var n=r(50);const i={agentIdentifier:"",ee:void 0};class o{constructor(e){try{if("object"!=typeof e)return(0,n.Z)("shared context requires an object as input");this.sharedContext={},Object.assign(this.sharedContext,i),Object.entries(e).forEach((e=>{let[t,r]=e;Object.keys(i).includes(t)&&(this.sharedContext[t]=r)}))}catch(e){(0,n.Z)("An error occured while setting SharedContext",e)}}}},8e3:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{L:()=>d,R:()=>c});var n=r(2177),i=r(1284),o=r(4322),a=r(3325);const s={};function c(e,t){const r={staged:!1,priority:a.p[t]||0};u(e),s[e].get(t)||s[e].set(t,r)}function u(e){e&&(s[e]||(s[e]=new Map))}function d(){let e=arguments.length>0&&void 0!==arguments[0]?arguments[0]:"",t=arguments.length>1&&void 0!==arguments[1]?arguments[1]:"feature";if(u(e),!e||!s[e].get(t))return a(t);s[e].get(t).staged=!0;const r=[...s[e]];function a(t){const r=e?n.ee.get(e):n.ee,a=o.X.handlers;if(r.backlog&&a){var s=r.backlog[t],c=a[t];if(c){for(var u=0;s&&u {let[t,r]=e;return r.staged}))&&(r.sort(((e,t)=>e[1].priority-t[1].priority)),r.forEach((e=>{let[t]=e;a(t)})))}function f(e,t){var r=e[1];(0,i.D)(t[r],(function(t,r){var n=e[0];if(r[0]===n){var i=r[1],o=e[3],a=e[2];i.apply(o,a)}}))}},2177:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{c:()=>f,ee:()=>u});var n=r(8632),i=r(2210),o=r(1284),a=r(5763),s="nr@context";let c=(0,n.fP)();var u;function d(){}function f(e){return(0,i.X)(e,s,l)}function l(){return new d}function h(){u.aborted=!0,u.backlog={}}c.ee?u=c.ee:(u=function e(t,r){var n={},c={},f={},g=!1;try{g=16===r.length&&(0,a.OP)(r).isolatedBacklog}catch(e){}var p={on:b,addEventListener:b,removeEventListener:y,emit:v,get:x,listeners:w,context:m,buffer:A,abort:h,aborted:!1,isBuffering:E,debugId:r,backlog:g?{}:t&&"object"==typeof t.backlog?t.backlog:{}};return p;function m(e){return e&&e instanceof d?e:e?(0,i.X)(e,s,l):l()}function v(e,r,n,i,o){if(!1!==o&&(o=!0),!u.aborted||i){t&&o&&t.emit(e,r,n);for(var a=m(n),s=w(e),d=s.length,f=0;fn,p:()=>i});var n=r(2177).ee.get("handle");function i(e,t,r,i,o){o?(o.buffer([e],i),o.emit(e,t,r)):(n.buffer([e],i),n.emit(e,t,r))}},4322:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{X:()=>o});var n=r(5546);o.on=a;var i=o.handlers={};function o(e,t,r,o){a(o||n.E,i,e,t,r)}function a(e,t,r,i,o){o||(o="feature"),e||(e=n.E);var a=t[o]=t[o]||{};(a[r]=a[r]||[]).push([e,i])}},3239:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{bP:()=>s,iz:()=>c,m$:()=>a});var n=r(385);let i=!1,o=!1;try{const e={get passive(){return i=!0,!1},get signal(){return o=!0,!1}};n._A.addEventListener("test",null,e),n._A.removeEventListener("test",null,e)}catch(e){}function a(e,t){return i||o?{capture:!!e,passive:i,signal:t}:!!e}function s(e,t){let r=arguments.length>2&&void 0!==arguments[2]&&arguments[2],n=arguments.length>3?arguments[3]:void 0;window.addEventListener(e,t,a(r,n))}function c(e,t){let r=arguments.length>2&&void 0!==arguments[2]&&arguments[2],n=arguments.length>3?arguments[3]:void 0;document.addEventListener(e,t,a(r,n))}},4402:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{Ht:()=>u,M:()=>c,Rl:()=>a,ky:()=>s});var n=r(385);const i="xxxxxxxx-xxxx-4xxx-yxxx-xxxxxxxxxxxx";function o(e,t){return e?15&e[t]:16*Math.random()|0}function a(){const e=n._A?.crypto||n._A?.msCrypto;let t,r=0;return e&&e.getRandomValues&&(t=e.getRandomValues(new Uint8Array(31))),i.split("").map((e=>"x"===e?o(t,++r).toString(16):"y"===e?(3&o()|8).toString(16):e)).join("")}function s(e){const t=n._A?.crypto||n._A?.msCrypto;let r,i=0;t&&t.getRandomValues&&(r=t.getRandomValues(new Uint8Array(31)));const a=[];for(var s=0;s {r.d(t,{Bq:()=>n,Hb:()=>o,oD:()=>i});const n="NRBA",i=144e5,o=18e5},7894:(e,t,r)=>{function n(){return Math.round(performance.now())}r.d(t,{z:()=>n})},7243:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{e:()=>o});var n=r(385),i={};function o(e){if(e in i)return i[e];if(0===(e||"").indexOf("data:"))return{protocol:"data"};let t;var r=n._A?.location,o={};if(n.il)t=document.createElement("a"),t.href=e;else try{t=new URL(e,r.href)}catch(e){return o}o.port=t.port;var a=t.href.split("://");!o.port&&a[1]&&(o.port=a[1].split("/")[0].split("@").pop().split(":")[1]),o.port&&"0"!==o.port||(o.port="https"===a[0]?"443":"80"),o.hostname=t.hostname||r.hostname,o.pathname=t.pathname,o.protocol=a[0],"/"!==o.pathname.charAt(0)&&(o.pathname="/"+o.pathname);var s=!t.protocol||":"===t.protocol||t.protocol===r.protocol,c=t.hostname===r.hostname&&t.port===r.port;return o.sameOrigin=s&&(!t.hostname||c),"/"===o.pathname&&(i[e]=o),o}},50:(e,t,r)=>{function n(e,t){"function"==typeof console.warn&&(console.warn("New Relic: ".concat(e)),t&&console.warn(t))}r.d(t,{Z:()=>n})},2587:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{N:()=>c,T:()=>u});var n=r(2177),i=r(5546),o=r(8e3),a=r(3325);const s={stn:[a.D.sessionTrace],err:[a.D.jserrors,a.D.metrics],ins:[a.D.pageAction],spa:[a.D.spa],sr:[a.D.sessionReplay,a.D.sessionTrace]};function c(e,t){const r=n.ee.get(t);e&&"object"==typeof e&&(Object.entries(e).forEach((e=>{let[t,n]=e;void 0===u[t]&&(s[t]?s[t].forEach((e=>{n?(0,i.p)("feat-"+t,[],void 0,e,r):(0,i.p)("block-"+t,[],void 0,e,r),(0,i.p)("rumresp-"+t,[Boolean(n)],void 0,e,r)})):n&&(0,i.p)("feat-"+t,[],void 0,void 0,r),u[t]=Boolean(n))})),Object.keys(s).forEach((e=>{void 0===u[e]&&(s[e]?.forEach((t=>(0,i.p)("rumresp-"+e,[!1],void 0,t,r))),u[e]=!1)})),(0,o.L)(t,a.D.pageViewEvent))}const u={}},2210:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{X:()=>i});var n=Object.prototype.hasOwnProperty;function i(e,t,r){if(n.call(e,t))return e[t];var i=r();if(Object.defineProperty&&Object.keys)try{return Object.defineProperty(e,t,{value:i,writable:!0,enumerable:!1}),i}catch(e){}return e[t]=i,i}},1284:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{D:()=>n});const n=(e,t)=>Object.entries(e||{}).map((e=>{let[r,n]=e;return t(r,n)}))},4351:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{P:()=>o});var n=r(2177);const i=()=>{const e=new WeakSet;return(t,r)=>{if("object"==typeof r&&null!==r){if(e.has(r))return;e.add(r)}return r}};function o(e){try{return JSON.stringify(e,i())}catch(e){try{n.ee.emit("internal-error",[e])}catch(e){}}}},3960:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{K:()=>a,b:()=>o});var n=r(3239);function i(){return"undefined"==typeof document||"complete"===document.readyState}function o(e,t){if(i())return e();(0,n.bP)("load",e,t)}function a(e){if(i())return e();(0,n.iz)("DOMContentLoaded",e)}},8632:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{EZ:()=>u,Qy:()=>c,ce:()=>o,fP:()=>a,gG:()=>d,mF:()=>s});var n=r(7894),i=r(385);const o={beacon:"bam.nr-data.net",errorBeacon:"bam.nr-data.net"};function a(){return i._A.NREUM||(i._A.NREUM={}),void 0===i._A.newrelic&&(i._A.newrelic=i._A.NREUM),i._A.NREUM}function s(){let e=a();return e.o||(e.o={ST:i._A.setTimeout,SI:i._A.setImmediate,CT:i._A.clearTimeout,XHR:i._A.XMLHttpRequest,REQ:i._A.Request,EV:i._A.Event,PR:i._A.Promise,MO:i._A.MutationObserver,FETCH:i._A.fetch}),e}function c(e,t,r){let i=a();const o=i.initializedAgents||{},s=o[e]||{};return Object.keys(s).length||(s.initializedAt={ms:(0,n.z)(),date:new Date}),i.initializedAgents={...o,[e]:{...s,[r]:t}},i}function u(e,t){a()[e]=t}function d(){return function(){let e=a();const t=e.info||{};e.info={beacon:o.beacon,errorBeacon:o.errorBeacon,...t}}(),function(){let e=a();const t=e.init||{};e.init={...t}}(),s(),function(){let e=a();const t=e.loader_config||{};e.loader_config={...t}}(),a()}},7956:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{N:()=>i});var n=r(3239);function i(e){let t=arguments.length>1&&void 0!==arguments[1]&&arguments[1],r=arguments.length>2?arguments[2]:void 0,i=arguments.length>3?arguments[3]:void 0;return void(0,n.iz)("visibilitychange",(function(){if(t)return void("hidden"==document.visibilityState&&e());e(document.visibilityState)}),r,i)}},1214:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{em:()=>v,u5:()=>N,QU:()=>S,_L:()=>I,Gm:()=>L,Lg:()=>M,gy:()=>U,BV:()=>Q,Kf:()=>ee});var n=r(2177);const i="nr@original";var o=Object.prototype.hasOwnProperty,a=!1;function s(e,t){return e||(e=n.ee),r.inPlace=function(e,t,n,i,o){n||(n="");var a,s,c,u="-"===n.charAt(0);for(c=0;c 2?n-2:0),o=2;o {r(A[T],e,w),r(E[T],e,w)})),r(l._A,"fetch",y),t.on(y+"end",(function(e,r){var n=this;if(r){var i=r.headers.get("content-length");null!==i&&(n.rxSize=i),t.emit(y+"done",[null,r],n)}else t.emit(y+"done",[e],n)})),t}const O={},j=["pushState","replaceState"];function S(e){const t=function(e){return(e||n.ee).get("history")}(e);return!l.il||O[t.debugId]++||(O[t.debugId]=1,s(t).inPlace(window.history,j,"-")),t}var P=r(3239);const C={},R=["appendChild","insertBefore","replaceChild"];function I(e){const t=function(e){return(e||n.ee).get("jsonp")}(e);if(!l.il||C[t.debugId])return t;C[t.debugId]=!0;var r=s(t),i=/[?&](?:callback|cb)=([^&#]+)/,o=/(.*)\.([^.]+)/,a=/^(\w+)(\.|$)(.*)$/;function c(e,t){var r=e.match(a),n=r[1],i=r[3];return i?c(i,t[n]):t[n]}return r.inPlace(Node.prototype,R,"dom-"),t.on("dom-start",(function(e){!function(e){if(!e||"string"!=typeof e.nodeName||"script"!==e.nodeName.toLowerCase())return;if("function"!=typeof e.addEventListener)return;var n=(a=e.src,s=a.match(i),s?s[1]:null);var a,s;if(!n)return;var u=function(e){var t=e.match(o);if(t&&t.length>=3)return{key:t[2],parent:c(t[1],window)};return{key:e,parent:window}}(n);if("function"!=typeof u.parent[u.key])return;var d={};function f(){t.emit("jsonp-end",[],d),e.removeEventListener("load",f,(0,P.m$)(!1)),e.removeEventListener("error",l,(0,P.m$)(!1))}function l(){t.emit("jsonp-error",[],d),t.emit("jsonp-end",[],d),e.removeEventListener("load",f,(0,P.m$)(!1)),e.removeEventListener("error",l,(0,P.m$)(!1))}r.inPlace(u.parent,[u.key],"cb-",d),e.addEventListener("load",f,(0,P.m$)(!1)),e.addEventListener("error",l,(0,P.m$)(!1)),t.emit("new-jsonp",[e.src],d)}(e[0])})),t}var k=r(5763);const H={};function L(e){const t=function(e){return(e||n.ee).get("mutation")}(e);if(!l.il||H[t.debugId])return t;H[t.debugId]=!0;var r=s(t),i=k.Yu.MO;return i&&(window.MutationObserver=function(e){return this instanceof i?new i(r(e,"fn-")):i.apply(this,arguments)},MutationObserver.prototype=i.prototype),t}const z={};function M(e){const t=function(e){return(e||n.ee).get("promise")}(e);if(z[t.debugId])return t;z[t.debugId]=!0;var r=n.c,o=s(t),a=k.Yu.PR;return a&&function(){function e(r){var n=t.context(),i=o(r,"executor-",n,null,!1);const s=Reflect.construct(a,[i],e);return t.context(s).getCtx=function(){return n},s}l._A.Promise=e,Object.defineProperty(e,"name",{value:"Promise"}),e.toString=function(){return a.toString()},Object.setPrototypeOf(e,a),["all","race"].forEach((function(r){const n=a[r];e[r]=function(e){let i=!1;[...e||[]].forEach((e=>{this.resolve(e).then(a("all"===r),a(!1))}));const o=n.apply(this,arguments);return o;function a(e){return function(){t.emit("propagate",[null,!i],o,!1,!1),i=i||!e}}}})),["resolve","reject"].forEach((function(r){const n=a[r];e[r]=function(e){const r=n.apply(this,arguments);return e!==r&&t.emit("propagate",[e,!0],r,!1,!1),r}})),e.prototype=a.prototype;const n=a.prototype.then;a.prototype.then=function(){var e=this,i=r(e);i.promise=e;for(var a=arguments.length,s=new Array(a),c=0;c e())),t};function m(e,t){i.inPlace(t,["onreadystatechange"],"fn-",E)}function b(){var e=this,t=r.context(e);e.readyState>3&&!t.resolved&&(t.resolved=!0,r.emit("xhr-resolved",[],e)),i.inPlace(e,f,"fn-",E)}if(function(e,t){for(var r in e)t[r]=e[r]}(o,p),p.prototype=o.prototype,i.inPlace(p.prototype,J,"-xhr-",E),r.on("send-xhr-start",(function(e,t){m(e,t),function(e){h.push(e),a&&(y?y.then(A):u?u(A):(w=-w,x.data=w))}(t)})),r.on("open-xhr-start",m),a){var y=c&&c.resolve();if(!u&&!c){var w=1,x=document.createTextNode(w);new a(A).observe(x,{characterData:!0})}}else t.on("fn-end",(function(e){e[0]&&e[0].type===d||A()}));function A(){for(var e=0;e {r.d(t,{t:()=>n});const n=r(3325).D.ajax},6660:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{A:()=>i,t:()=>n});const n=r(3325).D.jserrors,i="nr@seenError"},3081:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{gF:()=>o,mY:()=>i,t9:()=>n,vz:()=>s,xS:()=>a});const n=r(3325).D.metrics,i="sm",o="cm",a="storeSupportabilityMetrics",s="storeEventMetrics"},4649:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{t:()=>n});const n=r(3325).D.pageAction},7633:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{Dz:()=>i,OJ:()=>a,qw:()=>o,t9:()=>n});const n=r(3325).D.pageViewEvent,i="firstbyte",o="domcontent",a="windowload"},9251:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{t:()=>n});const n=r(3325).D.pageViewTiming},3614:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{BST_RESOURCE:()=>i,END:()=>s,FEATURE_NAME:()=>n,FN_END:()=>u,FN_START:()=>c,PUSH_STATE:()=>d,RESOURCE:()=>o,START:()=>a});const n=r(3325).D.sessionTrace,i="bstResource",o="resource",a="-start",s="-end",c="fn"+a,u="fn"+s,d="pushState"},7836:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{BODY:()=>A,CB_END:()=>E,CB_START:()=>u,END:()=>x,FEATURE_NAME:()=>i,FETCH:()=>_,FETCH_BODY:()=>v,FETCH_DONE:()=>m,FETCH_START:()=>p,FN_END:()=>c,FN_START:()=>s,INTERACTION:()=>l,INTERACTION_API:()=>d,INTERACTION_EVENTS:()=>o,JSONP_END:()=>b,JSONP_NODE:()=>g,JS_TIME:()=>T,MAX_TIMER_BUDGET:()=>a,REMAINING:()=>f,SPA_NODE:()=>h,START:()=>w,originalSetTimeout:()=>y});var n=r(5763);const i=r(3325).D.spa,o=["click","submit","keypress","keydown","keyup","change"],a=999,s="fn-start",c="fn-end",u="cb-start",d="api-ixn-",f="remaining",l="interaction",h="spaNode",g="jsonpNode",p="fetch-start",m="fetch-done",v="fetch-body-",b="jsonp-end",y=n.Yu.ST,w="-start",x="-end",A="-body",E="cb"+x,T="jsTime",_="fetch"},5938:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{W:()=>o});var n=r(5763),i=r(2177);class o{constructor(e,t,r){this.agentIdentifier=e,this.aggregator=t,this.ee=i.ee.get(e,(0,n.OP)(this.agentIdentifier).isolatedBacklog),this.featureName=r,this.blocked=!1}}},9144:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{j:()=>m});var n=r(3325),i=r(5763),o=r(5546),a=r(2177),s=r(7894),c=r(8e3),u=r(3960),d=r(385),f=r(50),l=r(3081),h=r(8632);function g(){const e=(0,h.gG)();["setErrorHandler","finished","addToTrace","inlineHit","addRelease","addPageAction","setCurrentRouteName","setPageViewName","setCustomAttribute","interaction","noticeError","setUserId"].forEach((t=>{e[t]=function(){for(var r=arguments.length,n=new Array(r),i=0;i 1?r-1:0),i=1;i {e.exposed&&e.api[t]&&o.push(e.api[t](...n))})),o.length>1?o:o[0]}(t,...n)}}))}var p=r(2587);function m(e){let t=arguments.length>1&&void 0!==arguments[1]?arguments[1]:{},m=arguments.length>2?arguments[2]:void 0,v=arguments.length>3?arguments[3]:void 0,{init:b,info:y,loader_config:w,runtime:x={loaderType:m},exposed:A=!0}=t;const E=(0,h.gG)();y||(b=E.init,y=E.info,w=E.loader_config),(0,i.Dg)(e,b||{}),(0,i.GE)(e,w||{}),(0,i.sU)(e,x),y.jsAttributes??={},d.v6&&(y.jsAttributes.isWorker=!0),(0,i.CX)(e,y),g();const T=function(e,t){t||(0,c.R)(e,"api");const h={};var g=a.ee.get(e),p=g.get("tracer"),m="api-",v=m+"ixn-";function b(t,r,n,o){const a=(0,i.C5)(e);return null===r?delete a.jsAttributes[t]:(0,i.CX)(e,{...a,jsAttributes:{...a.jsAttributes,[t]:r}}),x(m,n,!0,o||null===r?"session":void 0)(t,r)}function y(){}["setErrorHandler","finished","addToTrace","inlineHit","addRelease"].forEach((e=>h[e]=x(m,e,!0,"api"))),h.addPageAction=x(m,"addPageAction",!0,n.D.pageAction),h.setCurrentRouteName=x(m,"routeName",!0,n.D.spa),h.setPageViewName=function(t,r){if("string"==typeof t)return"/"!==t.charAt(0)&&(t="/"+t),(0,i.OP)(e).customTransaction=(r||"http://custom.transaction")+t,x(m,"setPageViewName",!0)()},h.setCustomAttribute=function(e,t){let r=arguments.length>2&&void 0!==arguments[2]&&arguments[2];if("string"==typeof e){if(["string","number"].includes(typeof t)||null===t)return b(e,t,"setCustomAttribute",r);(0,f.Z)("Failed to execute setCustomAttribute.\nNon-null value must be a string or number type, but a type of was provided."))}else(0,f.Z)("Failed to execute setCustomAttribute.\nName must be a string type, but a type of was provided."))},h.setUserId=function(e){if("string"==typeof e||null===e)return b("enduser.id",e,"setUserId",!0);(0,f.Z)("Failed to execute setUserId.\nNon-null value must be a string type, but a type of was provided."))},h.interaction=function(){return(new y).get()};var w=y.prototype={createTracer:function(e,t){var r={},i=this,a="function"==typeof t;return(0,o.p)(v+"tracer",[(0,s.z)(),e,r],i,n.D.spa,g),function(){if(p.emit((a?"":"no-")+"fn-start",[(0,s.z)(),i,a],r),a)try{return t.apply(this,arguments)}catch(e){throw p.emit("fn-err",[arguments,this,"string"==typeof e?new Error(e):e],r),e}finally{p.emit("fn-end",[(0,s.z)()],r)}}}};function x(e,t,r,i){return function(){return(0,o.p)(l.xS,["API/"+t+"/called"],void 0,n.D.metrics,g),i&&(0,o.p)(e+t,[(0,s.z)(),...arguments],r?null:this,i,g),r?void 0:this}}function A(){r.e(439).then(r.bind(r,7438)).then((t=>{let{setAPI:r}=t;r(e),(0,c.L)(e,"api")})).catch((()=>(0,f.Z)("Downloading runtime APIs failed...")))}return["actionText","setName","setAttribute","save","ignore","onEnd","getContext","end","get"].forEach((e=>{w[e]=x(v,e,void 0,n.D.spa)})),h.noticeError=function(e,t){"string"==typeof e&&(e=new Error(e)),(0,o.p)(l.xS,["API/noticeError/called"],void 0,n.D.metrics,g),(0,o.p)("err",[e,(0,s.z)(),!1,t],void 0,n.D.jserrors,g)},d.il?(0,u.b)((()=>A()),!0):A(),h}(e,v);return(0,h.Qy)(e,T,"api"),(0,h.Qy)(e,A,"exposed"),(0,h.EZ)("activatedFeatures",p.T),T}},3325:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{D:()=>n,p:()=>i});const n={ajax:"ajax",jserrors:"jserrors",metrics:"metrics",pageAction:"page_action",pageViewEvent:"page_view_event",pageViewTiming:"page_view_timing",sessionReplay:"session_replay",sessionTrace:"session_trace",spa:"spa"},i={[n.pageViewEvent]:1,[n.pageViewTiming]:2,[n.metrics]:3,[n.jserrors]:4,[n.ajax]:5,[n.sessionTrace]:6,[n.pageAction]:7,[n.spa]:8,[n.sessionReplay]:9}}},n={};function i(e){var t=n[e];if(void 0!==t)return t.exports;var o=n[e]={exports:{}};return r[e](o,o.exports,i),o.exports}i.m=r,i.d=(e,t)=>{for(var r in t)i.o(t,r)&&!i.o(e,r)&&Object.defineProperty(e,r,{enumerable:!0,get:t[r]})},i.f={},i.e=e=>Promise.all(Object.keys(i.f).reduce(((t,r)=>(i.f[r](e,t),t)),[])),i.u=e=>(({78:"page_action-aggregate",147:"metrics-aggregate",242:"session-manager",317:"jserrors-aggregate",348:"page_view_timing-aggregate",412:"lazy-feature-loader",439:"async-api",538:"recorder",590:"session_replay-aggregate",675:"compressor",733:"session_trace-aggregate",786:"page_view_event-aggregate",873:"spa-aggregate",898:"ajax-aggregate"}[e]||e)+"."+{78:"ac76d497",147:"3dc53903",148:"1a20d5fe",242:"2a64278a",317:"49e41428",348:"bd6de33a",412:"2f55ce66",439:"30bd804e",538:"1b18459f",590:"cf0efb30",675:"ae9f91a8",733:"83105561",786:"06482edd",860:"03a8b7a5",873:"e6b09d52",898:"998ef92b"}[e]+"-1.236.0.min.js"),i.o=(e,t)=>Object.prototype.hasOwnProperty.call(e,t),e={},t="NRBA:",i.l=(r,n,o,a)=>{if(e[r])e[r].push(n);else{var s,c;if(void 0!==o)for(var u=document.getElementsByTagName("script"),d=0;d {s.onerror=s.onload=null,clearTimeout(h);var i=e[r];if(delete e[r],s.parentNode&&s.parentNode.removeChild(s),i&&i.forEach((e=>e(n))),t)return t(n)},h=setTimeout(l.bind(null,void 0,{type:"timeout",target:s}),12e4);s.onerror=l.bind(null,s.onerror),s.onload=l.bind(null,s.onload),c&&document.head.appendChild(s)}},i.r=e=>{"undefined"!=typeof Symbol&&Symbol.toStringTag&&Object.defineProperty(e,Symbol.toStringTag,{value:"Module"}),Object.defineProperty(e,"__esModule",{value:!0})},i.j=364,i.p="https://js-agent.newrelic.com/",(()=>{var e={364:0,953:0};i.f.j=(t,r)=>{var n=i.o(e,t)?e[t]:void 0;if(0!==n)if(n)r.push(n[2]);else{var o=new Promise(((r,i)=>n=e[t]=[r,i]));r.push(n[2]=o);var a=i.p+i.u(t),s=new Error;i.l(a,(r=>{if(i.o(e,t)&&(0!==(n=e[t])&&(e[t]=void 0),n)){var o=r&&("load"===r.type?"missing":r.type),a=r&&r.target&&r.target.src;s.message="Loading chunk "+t+" failed.\n("+o+": "+a+")",s.name="ChunkLoadError",s.type=o,s.request=a,n[1](s)}}),"chunk-"+t,t)}};var t=(t,r)=>{var n,o,[a,s,c]=r,u=0;if(a.some((t=>0!==e[t]))){for(n in s)i.o(s,n)&&(i.m[n]=s[n]);if(c)c(i)}for(t&&t(r);u {i.r(o);var e=i(3325),t=i(5763);const r=Object.values(e.D);function n(e){const n={};return r.forEach((r=>{n[r]=function(e,r){return!1!==(0,t.Mt)(r,"".concat(e,".enabled"))}(r,e)})),n}var a=i(9144);var s=i(5546),c=i(385),u=i(8e3),d=i(5938),f=i(3960),l=i(50);class h extends d.W{constructor(e,t,r){let n=!(arguments.length>3&&void 0!==arguments[3])||arguments[3];super(e,t,r),this.auto=n,this.abortHandler,this.featAggregate,this.onAggregateImported,n&&(0,u.R)(e,r)}importAggregator(){let e=arguments.length>0&&void 0!==arguments[0]?arguments[0]:{};if(this.featAggregate||!this.auto)return;const r=c.il&&!0===(0,t.Mt)(this.agentIdentifier,"privacy.cookies_enabled");let n;this.onAggregateImported=new Promise((e=>{n=e}));const o=async()=>{let t;try{if(r){const{setupAgentSession:e}=await Promise.all([i.e(860),i.e(242)]).then(i.bind(i,3228));t=e(this.agentIdentifier)}}catch(e){(0,l.Z)("A problem occurred when starting up session manager. This page will not start or extend any session.",e)}try{if(!this.shouldImportAgg(this.featureName,t))return void(0,u.L)(this.agentIdentifier,this.featureName);const{lazyFeatureLoader:r}=await i.e(412).then(i.bind(i,8582)),{Aggregate:o}=await r(this.featureName,"aggregate");this.featAggregate=new o(this.agentIdentifier,this.aggregator,e),n(!0)}catch(e){(0,l.Z)("Downloading and initializing ".concat(this.featureName," failed..."),e),this.abortHandler?.(),n(!1)}};c.il?(0,f.b)((()=>o()),!0):o()}shouldImportAgg(r,n){return r!==e.D.sessionReplay||!1!==(0,t.Mt)(this.agentIdentifier,"session_trace.enabled")&&(!!n?.isNew||!!n?.state.sessionReplay)}}var g=i(7633),p=i(7894);class m extends h{static featureName=g.t9;constructor(r,n){let i=!(arguments.length>2&&void 0!==arguments[2])||arguments[2];if(super(r,n,g.t9,i),("undefined"==typeof PerformanceNavigationTiming||c.Tt)&&"undefined"!=typeof PerformanceTiming){const n=(0,t.OP)(r);n[g.Dz]=Math.max(Date.now()-n.offset,0),(0,f.K)((()=>n[g.qw]=Math.max((0,p.z)()-n[g.Dz],0))),(0,f.b)((()=>{const t=(0,p.z)();n[g.OJ]=Math.max(t-n[g.Dz],0),(0,s.p)("timing",["load",t],void 0,e.D.pageViewTiming,this.ee)}))}this.importAggregator()}}var v=i(1117),b=i(1284);class y extends v.w{constructor(e){super(e),this.aggregatedData={}}store(e,t,r,n,i){var o=this.getBucket(e,t,r,i);return o.metrics=function(e,t){t||(t={count:0});return t.count+=1,(0,b.D)(e,(function(e,r){t[e]=w(r,t[e])})),t}(n,o.metrics),o}merge(e,t,r,n,i){var o=this.getBucket(e,t,n,i);if(o.metrics){var a=o.metrics;a.count+=r.count,(0,b.D)(r,(function(e,t){if("count"!==e){var n=a[e],i=r[e];i&&!i.c?a[e]=w(i.t,n):a[e]=function(e,t){if(!t)return e;t.c||(t=x(t.t));return t.min=Math.min(e.min,t.min),t.max=Math.max(e.max,t.max),t.t+=e.t,t.sos+=e.sos,t.c+=e.c,t}(i,a[e])}}))}else o.metrics=r}storeMetric(e,t,r,n){var i=this.getBucket(e,t,r);return i.stats=w(n,i.stats),i}getBucket(e,t,r,n){this.aggregatedData[e]||(this.aggregatedData[e]={});var i=this.aggregatedData[e][t];return i||(i=this.aggregatedData[e][t]={params:r||{}},n&&(i.custom=n)),i}get(e,t){return t?this.aggregatedData[e]&&this.aggregatedData[e][t]:this.aggregatedData[e]}take(e){for(var t={},r="",n=!1,i=0;i t.max&&(t.max=e),e 2&&void 0!==arguments[2])||arguments[2];super(e,r,j.t,n),c.il&&((0,t.OP)(e).initHidden=Boolean("hidden"===document.visibilityState),(0,N.N)((()=>(0,s.p)("docHidden",[(0,p.z)()],void 0,j.t,this.ee)),!0),(0,O.bP)("pagehide",(()=>(0,s.p)("winPagehide",[(0,p.z)()],void 0,j.t,this.ee))),this.importAggregator())}}var P=i(3081);class C extends h{static featureName=P.t9;constructor(e,t){let r=!(arguments.length>2&&void 0!==arguments[2])||arguments[2];super(e,t,P.t9,r),this.importAggregator()}}var R,I=i(2210),k=i(1214),H=i(2177),L={};try{R=localStorage.getItem("__nr_flags").split(","),console&&"function"==typeof console.log&&(L.console=!0,-1!==R.indexOf("dev")&&(L.dev=!0),-1!==R.indexOf("nr_dev")&&(L.nrDev=!0))}catch(e){}function z(e){try{L.console&&z(e)}catch(e){}}L.nrDev&&H.ee.on("internal-error",(function(e){z(e.stack)})),L.dev&&H.ee.on("fn-err",(function(e,t,r){z(r.stack)})),L.dev&&(z("NR AGENT IN DEVELOPMENT MODE"),z("flags: "+(0,b.D)(L,(function(e,t){return e})).join(", ")));var M=i(6660);class B extends h{static featureName=M.t;constructor(r,n){let i=!(arguments.length>2&&void 0!==arguments[2])||arguments[2];super(r,n,M.t,i),this.skipNext=0;try{this.removeOnAbort=new AbortController}catch(e){}const o=this;o.ee.on("fn-start",(function(e,t,r){o.abortHandler&&(o.skipNext+=1)})),o.ee.on("fn-err",(function(t,r,n){o.abortHandler&&!n[M.A]&&((0,I.X)(n,M.A,(function(){return!0})),this.thrown=!0,(0,s.p)("err",[n,(0,p.z)()],void 0,e.D.jserrors,o.ee))})),o.ee.on("fn-end",(function(){o.abortHandler&&!this.thrown&&o.skipNext>0&&(o.skipNext-=1)})),o.ee.on("internal-error",(function(t){(0,s.p)("ierr",[t,(0,p.z)(),!0],void 0,e.D.jserrors,o.ee)})),this.origOnerror=c._A.onerror,c._A.onerror=this.onerrorHandler.bind(this),c._A.addEventListener("unhandledrejection",(t=>{const r=function(e){let t="Unhandled Promise Rejection: ";if(e instanceof Error)try{return e.message=t+e.message,e}catch(t){return e}if(void 0===e)return new Error(t);try{return new Error(t+(0,D.P)(e))}catch(e){return new Error(t)}}(t.reason);(0,s.p)("err",[r,(0,p.z)(),!1,{unhandledPromiseRejection:1}],void 0,e.D.jserrors,this.ee)}),(0,O.m$)(!1,this.removeOnAbort?.signal)),(0,k.gy)(this.ee),(0,k.BV)(this.ee),(0,k.em)(this.ee),(0,t.OP)(r).xhrWrappable&&(0,k.Kf)(this.ee),this.abortHandler=this.#e,this.importAggregator()}#e(){this.removeOnAbort?.abort(),this.abortHandler=void 0}onerrorHandler(t,r,n,i,o){"function"==typeof this.origOnerror&&this.origOnerror(...arguments);try{this.skipNext?this.skipNext-=1:(0,s.p)("err",[o||new F(t,r,n),(0,p.z)()],void 0,e.D.jserrors,this.ee)}catch(t){try{(0,s.p)("ierr",[t,(0,p.z)(),!0],void 0,e.D.jserrors,this.ee)}catch(e){}}return!1}}function F(e,t,r){this.message=e||"Uncaught error with no additional information",this.sourceURL=t,this.line=r}let U=1;const q="nr@id";function G(e){const t=typeof e;return!e||"object"!==t&&"function"!==t?-1:e===c._A?0:(0,I.X)(e,q,(function(){return U++}))}function V(e){if("string"==typeof e&&e.length)return e.length;if("object"==typeof e){if("undefined"!=typeof ArrayBuffer&&e instanceof ArrayBuffer&&e.byteLength)return e.byteLength;if("undefined"!=typeof Blob&&e instanceof Blob&&e.size)return e.size;if(!("undefined"!=typeof FormData&&e instanceof FormData))try{return(0,D.P)(e).length}catch(e){return}}}var X=i(7243);class W{constructor(e){this.agentIdentifier=e,this.generateTracePayload=this.generateTracePayload.bind(this),this.shouldGenerateTrace=this.shouldGenerateTrace.bind(this)}generateTracePayload(e){if(!this.shouldGenerateTrace(e))return null;var r=(0,t.DL)(this.agentIdentifier);if(!r)return null;var n=(r.accountID||"").toString()||null,i=(r.agentID||"").toString()||null,o=(r.trustKey||"").toString()||null;if(!n||!i)return null;var a=(0,_.M)(),s=(0,_.Ht)(),c=Date.now(),u={spanId:a,traceId:s,timestamp:c};return(e.sameOrigin||this.isAllowedOrigin(e)&&this.useTraceContextHeadersForCors())&&(u.traceContextParentHeader=this.generateTraceContextParentHeader(a,s),u.traceContextStateHeader=this.generateTraceContextStateHeader(a,c,n,i,o)),(e.sameOrigin&&!this.excludeNewrelicHeader()||!e.sameOrigin&&this.isAllowedOrigin(e)&&this.useNewrelicHeaderForCors())&&(u.newrelicHeader=this.generateTraceHeader(a,s,c,n,i,o)),u}generateTraceContextParentHeader(e,t){return"00-"+t+"-"+e+"-01"}generateTraceContextStateHeader(e,t,r,n,i){return i+"@nr=0-1-"+r+"-"+n+"-"+e+"----"+t}generateTraceHeader(e,t,r,n,i,o){if(!("function"==typeof c._A?.btoa))return null;var a={v:[0,1],d:{ty:"Browser",ac:n,ap:i,id:e,tr:t,ti:r}};return o&&n!==o&&(a.d.tk=o),btoa((0,D.P)(a))}shouldGenerateTrace(e){return this.isDtEnabled()&&this.isAllowedOrigin(e)}isAllowedOrigin(e){var r=!1,n={};if((0,t.Mt)(this.agentIdentifier,"distributed_tracing")&&(n=(0,t.P_)(this.agentIdentifier).distributed_tracing),e.sameOrigin)r=!0;else if(n.allowed_origins instanceof Array)for(var i=0;i 2&&void 0!==arguments[2])||arguments[2];super(r,n,Z.t,i),(0,t.OP)(r).xhrWrappable&&(this.dt=new W(r),this.handler=(e,t,r,n)=>(0,s.p)(e,t,r,n,this.ee),(0,k.u5)(this.ee),(0,k.Kf)(this.ee),function(r,n,i,o){function a(e){var t=this;t.totalCbs=0,t.called=0,t.cbTime=0,t.end=E,t.ended=!1,t.xhrGuids={},t.lastSize=null,t.loadCaptureCalled=!1,t.params=this.params||{},t.metrics=this.metrics||{},e.addEventListener("load",(function(r){_(t,e)}),(0,O.m$)(!1)),c.IF||e.addEventListener("progress",(function(e){t.lastSize=e.loaded}),(0,O.m$)(!1))}function s(e){this.params={method:e[0]},T(this,e[1]),this.metrics={}}function u(e,n){var i=(0,t.DL)(r);i.xpid&&this.sameOrigin&&n.setRequestHeader("X-NewRelic-ID",i.xpid);var a=o.generateTracePayload(this.parsedOrigin);if(a){var s=!1;a.newrelicHeader&&(n.setRequestHeader("newrelic",a.newrelicHeader),s=!0),a.traceContextParentHeader&&(n.setRequestHeader("traceparent",a.traceContextParentHeader),a.traceContextStateHeader&&n.setRequestHeader("tracestate",a.traceContextStateHeader),s=!0),s&&(this.dt=a)}}function d(e,t){var r=this.metrics,i=e[0],o=this;if(r&&i){var a=V(i);a&&(r.txSize=a)}this.startTime=(0,p.z)(),this.listener=function(e){try{"abort"!==e.type||o.loadCaptureCalled||(o.params.aborted=!0),("load"!==e.type||o.called===o.totalCbs&&(o.onloadCalled||"function"!=typeof t.onload)&&"function"==typeof o.end)&&o.end(t)}catch(e){try{n.emit("internal-error",[e])}catch(e){}}};for(var s=0;s 1?e[1]=i:e.push(i)}else e[0]&&e[0].headers&&s(e[0].headers,n)&&(this.dt=n);function s(e,t){var r=!1;return t.newrelicHeader&&(e.set("newrelic",t.newrelicHeader),r=!0),t.traceContextParentHeader&&(e.set("traceparent",t.traceContextParentHeader),t.traceContextStateHeader&&e.set("tracestate",t.traceContextStateHeader),r=!0),r}}function x(e,t){this.params={},this.metrics={},this.startTime=(0,p.z)(),this.dt=t,e.length>=1&&(this.target=e[0]),e.length>=2&&(this.opts=e[1]);var r,n=this.opts||{},i=this.target;"string"==typeof i?r=i:"object"==typeof i&&i instanceof Y?r=i.url:c._A?.URL&&"object"==typeof i&&i instanceof URL&&(r=i.href),T(this,r);var o=(""+(i&&i instanceof Y&&i.method||n.method||"GET")).toUpperCase();this.params.method=o,this.txSize=V(n.body)||0}function A(t,r){var n;this.endTime=(0,p.z)(),this.params||(this.params={}),this.params.status=r?r.status:0,"string"==typeof this.rxSize&&this.rxSize.length>0&&(n=+this.rxSize);var o={txSize:this.txSize,rxSize:n,duration:(0,p.z)()-this.startTime};i("xhr",[this.params,o,this.startTime,this.endTime,"fetch"],this,e.D.ajax)}function E(t){var r=this.params,n=this.metrics;if(!this.ended){this.ended=!0;for(var o=0;o 2&&void 0!==arguments[2])||arguments[2];super(e,t,we.t,r),this.importAggregator()}}new class{constructor(e){let t=arguments.length>1&&void 0!==arguments[1]?arguments[1]:(0,_.ky)(16);c._A?(this.agentIdentifier=t,this.sharedAggregator=new y({agentIdentifier:this.agentIdentifier}),this.features={},this.desiredFeatures=new Set(e.features||[]),this.desiredFeatures.add(m),Object.assign(this,(0,a.j)(this.agentIdentifier,e,e.loaderType||"agent")),this.start()):(0,l.Z)("Failed to initial the agent. Could not determine the runtime environment.")}get config(){return{info:(0,t.C5)(this.agentIdentifier),init:(0,t.P_)(this.agentIdentifier),loader_config:(0,t.DL)(this.agentIdentifier),runtime:(0,t.OP)(this.agentIdentifier)}}start(){const t="features";try{const r=n(this.agentIdentifier),i=[...this.desiredFeatures];i.sort(((t,r)=>e.p[t.featureName]-e.p[r.featureName])),i.forEach((t=>{if(r[t.featureName]||t.featureName===e.D.pageViewEvent){const n=function(t){switch(t){case e.D.ajax:return[e.D.jserrors];case e.D.sessionTrace:return[e.D.ajax,e.D.pageViewEvent];case e.D.sessionReplay:return[e.D.sessionTrace];case e.D.pageViewTiming:return[e.D.pageViewEvent];default:return[]}}(t.featureName);n.every((e=>r[e]))||(0,l.Z)("".concat(t.featureName," is enabled but one or more dependent features has been disabled (").concat((0,D.P)(n),"). This may cause unintended consequences or missing data...")),this.features[t.featureName]=new t(this.agentIdentifier,this.sharedAggregator)}})),(0,T.Qy)(this.agentIdentifier,this.features,t)}catch(e){(0,l.Z)("Failed to initialize all enabled instrument classes (agent aborted) -",e);for(const e in this.features)this.features[e].abortHandler?.();const r=(0,T.fP)();return delete r.initializedAgents[this.agentIdentifier]?.api,delete r.initializedAgents[this.agentIdentifier]?.[t],delete this.sharedAggregator,r.ee?.abort(),delete r.ee?.get(this.agentIdentifier),!1}}}({features:[J,m,S,class extends h{static featureName=oe;constructor(t,r){if(super(t,r,oe,!(arguments.length>2&&void 0!==arguments[2])||arguments[2]),!c.il)return;const n=this.ee;let i;(0,k.QU)(n),this.eventsEE=(0,k.em)(n),this.eventsEE.on(se,(function(e,t){this.bstStart=(0,p.z)()})),this.eventsEE.on(ae,(function(t,r){(0,s.p)("bst",[t[0],r,this.bstStart,(0,p.z)()],void 0,e.D.sessionTrace,n)})),n.on(ce+ne,(function(e){this.time=(0,p.z)(),this.startPath=location.pathname+location.hash})),n.on(ce+ie,(function(t){(0,s.p)("bstHist",[location.pathname+location.hash,this.startPath,this.time],void 0,e.D.sessionTrace,n)}));try{i=new PerformanceObserver((t=>{const r=t.getEntries();(0,s.p)(te,[r],void 0,e.D.sessionTrace,n)})),i.observe({type:re,buffered:!0})}catch(e){}this.importAggregator({resourceObserver:i})}},C,xe,B,class extends h{static featureName=de;constructor(e,r){if(super(e,r,de,!(arguments.length>2&&void 0!==arguments[2])||arguments[2]),!c.il)return;if(!(0,t.OP)(e).xhrWrappable)return;try{this.removeOnAbort=new AbortController}catch(e){}let n,i=0;const o=this.ee.get("tracer"),a=(0,k._L)(this.ee),s=(0,k.Lg)(this.ee),u=(0,k.BV)(this.ee),d=(0,k.Kf)(this.ee),f=this.ee.get("events"),l=(0,k.u5)(this.ee),h=(0,k.QU)(this.ee),g=(0,k.Gm)(this.ee);function m(e,t){h.emit("newURL",[""+window.location,t])}function v(){i++,n=window.location.hash,this[ve]=(0,p.z)()}function b(){i--,window.location.hash!==n&&m(0,!0);var e=(0,p.z)();this[pe]=~~this[pe]+e-this[ve],this[ye]=e}function y(e,t){e.on(t,(function(){this[t]=(0,p.z)()}))}this.ee.on(ve,v),s.on(be,v),a.on(be,v),this.ee.on(ye,b),s.on(ge,b),a.on(ge,b),this.ee.buffer([ve,ye,"xhr-resolved"],this.featureName),f.buffer([ve],this.featureName),u.buffer(["setTimeout"+le,"clearTimeout"+fe,ve],this.featureName),d.buffer([ve,"new-xhr","send-xhr"+fe],this.featureName),l.buffer([me+fe,me+"-done",me+he+fe,me+he+le],this.featureName),h.buffer(["newURL"],this.featureName),g.buffer([ve],this.featureName),s.buffer(["propagate",be,ge,"executor-err","resolve"+fe],this.featureName),o.buffer([ve,"no-"+ve],this.featureName),a.buffer(["new-jsonp","cb-start","jsonp-error","jsonp-end"],this.featureName),y(l,me+fe),y(l,me+"-done"),y(a,"new-jsonp"),y(a,"jsonp-end"),y(a,"cb-start"),h.on("pushState-end",m),h.on("replaceState-end",m),window.addEventListener("hashchange",m,(0,O.m$)(!0,this.removeOnAbort?.signal)),window.addEventListener("load",m,(0,O.m$)(!0,this.removeOnAbort?.signal)),window.addEventListener("popstate",(function(){m(0,i>1)}),(0,O.m$)(!0,this.removeOnAbort?.signal)),this.abortHandler=this.#e,this.importAggregator()}#e(){this.removeOnAbort?.abort(),this.abortHandler=void 0}}],loaderType:"spa"})})(),window.NRBA=o})(); window.jQuery || document.write(' ') CKEDITOR_BASEPATH='https://f1000research.com/js/vendor/ckeditor/' window.reactTheme = 'research'; window.MathJax = { CommonHTML: { linebreaks: { automatic: true } }, 'HTML-CSS': { linebreaks: { automatic: true } }, SVG: { linebreaks: { automatic: true } }, AuthorInit: function() { MathJax.Hub.Register.MessageHook('End Process', function () { let timeout = false; // holder for timeout id const delay = 250; // delay after event is "complete" to run callback const reflowMath = function() { const dispFormulas = document.querySelectorAll('.disp-formula.panel'); if (!dispFormulas) { return; } for (const dispFormula of dispFormulas) { const child = dispFormula.querySelector('.MathJax_Preview').nextSibling.firstChild; const isMultiline = MathJax.Hub.getAllJax(dispFormula)[0].root.isMultiline; if (dispFormula.offsetWidth < child.offsetWidth || isMultiline) { MathJax.Hub.Queue(['Rerender', MathJax.Hub, dispFormula]); } } }; window.addEventListener('resize', function() { clearTimeout(timeout); // clear the timeout timeout = setTimeout(reflowMath, delay); // start timing for event "completion" }); }); }, }; if (window.location.hash == '#_=_'){ window.location = window.location.href.split('#')[0] } !function(f,b,e,v,n,t,s){if(f.fbq)return;n=f.fbq=function() {n.callMethod? n.callMethod.apply(n,arguments):n.queue.push(arguments)} ;if(!f._fbq)f._fbq=n; n.push=n;n.loaded=!0;n.version='2.0';n.queue=[];t=b.createElement(e);t.async=!0; t.src=v;s=b.getElementsByTagName(e)[0];s.parentNode.insertBefore(t,s)}(window, document,'script','https://connect.facebook.net/en_US/fbevents.js'); fbq('init', '1641728616063202'); fbq('track', "PixelInitialized", {}); (function(h,o,t,j,a,r){ h.hj=h.hj||function(){(h.hj.q=h.hj.q||[]).push(arguments)}; h._hjSettings={hjid:2318163,hjsv:6}; a=o.getElementsByTagName('head')[0]; r=o.createElement('script');r.async=1; r.src=t+h._hjSettings.hjid+j+h._hjSettings.hjsv; a.appendChild(r); })(window,document,'https://static.hotjar.com/c/hotjar-','.js?sv='); search file_upload Submit your research search menu close search Browse Gateways & Collections How to Publish Submit your Research My Submissions Article Guidelines Article Guidelines (New Versions) Open Data, Software and Code Guidelines Open Data and Accessible Source Materials Guidelines (HSS) Open Data, Software and Code Guidelines (PSE) Prepublication Checks Production Process Posters and Slides Guidelines Document Guidelines Article Processing Charges Peer Review Finding Article Reviewers About How it Works For Reviewers Our Advisors Policies Glossary FAQs For Developers Newsroom Contact My Research Submissions Content and Tracking Alerts My Details Sign In file_upload Submit your research { "@context": "https://schema.org", "@type": "ScholarlyArticle", "mainEntityOfPage": { "@type": "WebPage", "@id": "https://f1000research.com/articles/12-505" }, "headline": "A phenomenological analysis of the emotional experiences of graduate preservice student teachers in Indonesia", "datePublished": "2023-05-16T16:28:28", "dateModified": "2025-05-06T10:12:15", "author": [ { "@type": "Person", "name": "Sunardi Sunardi" }, { "@type": "Person", "name": "Famala Eka Sanhadi Rahayu" }, { "@type": "Person", "name": "Desy Rusmawaty" }, { "@type": "Person", "name": "Istanti Hermagustiana" }, { "@type": "Person", "name": "Dyah Sunggingwati" } ], "publisher": { "@type": "Organization", "name": "F1000Research", "logo": { "@type": "ImageObject", "url": "https://f1000research.com/img/AMP/F1000Research_image.png", "height": 480, "width": 60 } }, "image": { "@type": "ImageObject", "url": "https://f1000research.com/img/AMP/F1000Research_image.png", "height": 1200, "width": 150 }, "description": " Background Addressing preservice teachers' emotions can help them develop the emotional connections necessary for successful teaching practicums and professional learning experiences. To understand preservice teachers’ emotions towards their surroundings, the researchers used an emotional geography framework to map out the source of their negative and positive emotions and how those feelings affect their beliefs, teaching style, and paradigms. Emotional geographies were divided into two categories (i.e., emotional distance and emotional closeness), which were further mapped into five major themes (i.e., sociocultural, moral, professional, physical, and political). This study aims to investigate the emotional geographies of graduate preservice teachers during their teaching practicums in Indonesia by adapting Hargreaves’ (2001) theoretical model, thereby identifying key dimensions and validating the adapted framework. Methods This study examined emotional geographies of 15 graduate preservice student teachers of Teacher Training and Education Faculty of Mulawarman University during their teaching practicums. Moreover, this study used a qualitative design involving semi-structured interviews with 15 graduate students who completed their teaching practicums. Results The participants experienced all emotional geographies (sociocultural, moral, professional, physical, and political) that reshaped their beliefs and teaching styles, especially related to teaching undergraduate students. These emotions are generally experienced when the participants deal with the students and cooperating teachers. Conclusions It was found that teachers needed to be strict when instilling discipline in their students, develop friendships with their students to maintain classroom control, and require comprehensive preparation to create teacher's confidence and answer their students' questions. In effect, the theoretical framework of emotional geography when teaching undergraduates during practicums gave student teachers valuable experience to cope with all common teaching challenges and professional growth. " } { "@context": "http://schema.org", "@type": "BreadcrumbList", "itemListElement": [ { "@type": "ListItem", "position": "1", "item": { "@id": "https://f1000research.com/", "name": "Home" } }, { "@type": "ListItem", "position": "2", "item": { "@id": "https://f1000research.com/browse/articles", "name": "Browse" } }, { "@type": "ListItem", "position": "3", "item": { "@id": "https://f1000research.com/articles/12-505", "name": "A phenomenological analysis of the emotional experiences of graduate..." } } ] } Home Browse A phenomenological analysis of the emotional experiences of graduate... ALL Metrics - Views Downloads Get PDF Get XML Cite How to cite this article Sunardi S, Rahayu FES, Rusmawaty D et al. A phenomenological analysis of the emotional experiences of graduate preservice student teachers in Indonesia [version 3; peer review: 2 approved] . F1000Research 2025, 12 :505 ( https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.132112.3 ) NOTE: If applicable, it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article. Close Copy Citation Details Export Export Citation Sciwheel EndNote Ref. Manager Bibtex ProCite Sente EXPORT Select a format first Track Share ▬ ✚ Research Article Revised A phenomenological analysis of the emotional experiences of graduate preservice student teachers in Indonesia [version 3; peer review: 2 approved] Sunardi Sunardi https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1153-2593 1 , Famala Eka Sanhadi Rahayu https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7572-1537 2 , Desy Rusmawaty 1 , Istanti Hermagustiana 1 , Dyah Sunggingwati 1 Sunardi Sunardi https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1153-2593 1 , Famala Eka Sanhadi Rahayu https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7572-1537 2 , [...] Desy Rusmawaty 1 , Istanti Hermagustiana 1 , Dyah Sunggingwati 1 PUBLISHED 06 May 2025 Author details Author details 1 English Language Department of Teacher Training and Education Faculty, Universitas Mulawarman, Samarinda, East Kalimantan, 75123, Indonesia 2 English Literature of Cultural Science Faculty, Universitas Mulawarman, Samarinda, East Kalimantan, 75123, Indonesia Sunardi Sunardi Roles: Conceptualization, Methodology, Project Administration, Resources, Supervision, Writing – Review & Editing Famala Eka Sanhadi Rahayu Roles: Data Curation, Formal Analysis, Methodology, Writing – Original Draft Preparation, Writing – Review & Editing Desy Rusmawaty Roles: Supervision, Validation Istanti Hermagustiana Roles: Supervision, Validation Dyah Sunggingwati Roles: Supervision, Validation, Writing – Review & Editing OPEN PEER REVIEW DETAILS REVIEWER STATUS Abstract Background Addressing preservice teachers' emotions can help them develop the emotional connections necessary for successful teaching practicums and professional learning experiences. To understand preservice teachers’ emotions towards their surroundings, the researchers used an emotional geography framework to map out the source of their negative and positive emotions and how those feelings affect their beliefs, teaching style, and paradigms. Emotional geographies were divided into two categories (i.e., emotional distance and emotional closeness), which were further mapped into five major themes (i.e., sociocultural, moral, professional, physical, and political). This study aims to investigate the emotional geographies of graduate preservice teachers during their teaching practicums in Indonesia by adapting Hargreaves’ (2001) theoretical model, thereby identifying key dimensions and validating the adapted framework. Methods This study examined emotional geographies of 15 graduate preservice student teachers of Teacher Training and Education Faculty of Mulawarman University during their teaching practicums. Moreover, this study used a qualitative design involving semi-structured interviews with 15 graduate students who completed their teaching practicums. Results The participants experienced all emotional geographies (sociocultural, moral, professional, physical, and political) that reshaped their beliefs and teaching styles, especially related to teaching undergraduate students. These emotions are generally experienced when the participants deal with the students and cooperating teachers. Conclusions It was found that teachers needed to be strict when instilling discipline in their students, develop friendships with their students to maintain classroom control, and require comprehensive preparation to create teacher's confidence and answer their students' questions. In effect, the theoretical framework of emotional geography when teaching undergraduates during practicums gave student teachers valuable experience to cope with all common teaching challenges and professional growth. READ ALL READ LESS Keywords emotional geography, student teachers, teaching practicum, teacher education Corresponding Author(s) Famala Eka Sanhadi Rahayu ( [email protected] ) Close Corresponding author: Famala Eka Sanhadi Rahayu Competing interests: No competing interests were disclosed. Grant information: This project was supported by Teacher Training and Education Faculty of Mulawarman University with Grant Number 935/SK/2020. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript. Copyright: © 2025 Sunardi S et al . This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. How to cite: Sunardi S, Rahayu FES, Rusmawaty D et al. A phenomenological analysis of the emotional experiences of graduate preservice student teachers in Indonesia [version 3; peer review: 2 approved] . F1000Research 2025, 12 :505 ( https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.132112.3 ) First published: 16 May 2023, 12 :505 ( https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.132112.1 ) Latest published: 06 May 2025, 12 :505 ( https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.132112.3 ) Revised Amendments from Version 2 In this revised version, we made several key improvements to the methodology section to ensure clearer alignment with the research objectives. First, we explicitly added the research question to the introduction to clearly define the focus of the study. Second, in the Instruments section, we expanded the explanation of how the semi-structured interview questions were constructed based on Hargreaves’ emotional geography framework to directly address the research question. Third, in the Data Collection Procedures, we provided a more detailed account of how participants were recruited, how the interviews were conducted online, and how data verification with participants was carried out. Lastly, in the Data Analysis section, we clarified the step-by-step phenomenological approach and explicitly connected the analytical process to answering the research question. These additions were made to improve the transparency and rigor of the study design while maintaining the integrity of the original findings and interpretations. In this revised version, we made several key improvements to the methodology section to ensure clearer alignment with the research objectives. First, we explicitly added the research question to the introduction to clearly define the focus of the study. Second, in the Instruments section, we expanded the explanation of how the semi-structured interview questions were constructed based on Hargreaves’ emotional geography framework to directly address the research question. Third, in the Data Collection Procedures, we provided a more detailed account of how participants were recruited, how the interviews were conducted online, and how data verification with participants was carried out. Lastly, in the Data Analysis section, we clarified the step-by-step phenomenological approach and explicitly connected the analytical process to answering the research question. These additions were made to improve the transparency and rigor of the study design while maintaining the integrity of the original findings and interpretations. See the authors' detailed response to the review by Maria Olímpia Paiva See the authors' detailed response to the review by Xuesong Gao READ REVIEWER RESPONSES Introduction Teacher education can mold the personalities of a nation’s future generations. Therefore, high-quality teacher education aims to develop qualified, competent teachers in order to shape a country’s education future, which requires relevant teacher education courses that build and strengthen teacher competencies. One such program is a practicum, which is a required teacher education component from which preservice teachers can acquire professional growth and apply theoretical learning to practical situations ( Hascher & Hagenauer, 2016 ). Preservice teachers refer to teaching candidates enrolled in post-secondary education-related degree programs who are receiving their initial training before practicing and have not yet taught in a classroom ( Milner et al ., 2003 ). In Indonesia, preservice teacher practicums are defined under the Ministry of Research, Technology, and Higher Education Regulation No. 55 of 2017 on Teacher Education Standards, paragraph 9, which states that all teacher training institutions must provide practicum programs that involve microteaching and school-based practicums. Professional experience and/or teaching practicums are bridges between theory and practice and provide authentic preservice experiences for developing pedagogical skills and a familiarity with the teaching education landscape ( Kaldi & Xafakos, 2017 ), which is critical because good teaching performances are related to strong pedagogical foundations ( Hargreaves & Shirley, 2012 ). Therefore, teaching practicums provide student teachers with experience in teaching in terms of teacher education and preparation programs. Studies into preservice or student teachers can be valuable because such teachers have dual roles as both students and teachers, and their success in teacher education programs may reveal their potential as future educators ( Lipka & Brinthaupt, 1999 ). Several studies have been conducted on preservice teachers, which involved assessing their knowledge and competence ( Alkharusi et al ., 2011 ; Petrovici & Masari, 2014 ; Ragawanti, 2015 ; Valli et al ., 2013 ; Walton & Rusznyak, 2013 ), attitudes toward teacher programs and the teaching profession ( Bhargava and Pathy, 2014 ; Mule, 2006 ), the challenges ( Karunagaran & Saimin, 2019 ; Shah et al ., 2021 ), anxiety ( Agustiana, 2014 ; Daud et al ., 2019 ), and perceptions ( Adodo, 2013 ; Kumazawa, 2013 ; Sun & van Es, 2015 ; Thomas & O’Bannon, 2013 ; Zhu, 2017 ). While much of this study emphasizes the need to improve teacher education quality and preservice teacher abilities, few studies were noted to examine preservice teachers’ emotions during their practicums. Emotional effects have frequently been ignored because of a lack of awareness of the effects of teacher emotions on teaching quality. However, understanding teachers’ feelings could provide a more comprehensive perspective on teacher education effectiveness. Therefore, this study investigated the feelings that preservice teachers had during their teaching practicums and the influence of these emotions had on their teaching paradigms, beliefs, and teaching styles. One of the tools to assess teachers’ emotional geography in the classroom is by examining their emotion through Hargreave's emotional geography framework. Emotional geographies outline the patterns of closeness and distance in human interactions, influencing the emotions experienced in our relationships with ourselves, others, and the broader world. Hargreaves (2001b) emphasizes that understanding teachers’ emotions is crucial because these feelings affect both classroom climate and learning activities. His framework categorizes emotional interactions into five dimensions–sociocultural, moral, professional, physical, and political–which we adapt in the current study. Hargreaves’ (2001b) emotional geography framework can also be used to map a teacher’s series of feelings. This framework defines five emotional geographies (i.e., sociocultural, moral, professional, physical, and political) as geographical and experiential patterns of closeness/distance in human connections that form, configure, and color feelings about ourselves, the world, and one another. Moreover, Hargreaves’ model identifies five distinct dimensions. The sociocultural dimension explains how differences in cultural norms, social practices, and economic contexts create either inclusion or exclusion; the moral dimension addresses how ethical expectations and value judgments trigger responses when norms are breached; the professional dimension reflects how perceptions of pedagogical competence and self-confidence shape emotions, especially amid uncertainty; the physical dimension considers how spatial arrangements and embodied interactions evoke comfort or apprehension; and the political dimension examines how power dynamics and authority relationships contribute to feelings of empowerment or disempowerment. Various studies revealed that teachers encountered emotional geographies in their interactions with parents ( Chen & Wang, 2011 ; Sanhadi Rahayu & Asanti, 2021 ), colleagues ( Hargreaves, 2001a ), students ( Hargreaves, 2000 ), and principals ( Lassila et al ., 2017 ) as well as during the teaching process itself ( Hargreaves, 1998a ; Hargreaves & Tucker, 1991 ). However, the investigation of emotional geography of preservice teacher during the practicum has remained unseen by many scholars. Therefore, the present researchers want to fill this gap through this study. As aforementioned, a teaching practicum provides real-life experience in teaching students in the classroom. However, preservice teachers encounter various obstacles and experience a variety of emotions during their teaching practice. They have to deal with various settings involving students and the sociocultural contexts in the institution in which they are teaching ( Riesky, 2013 ). This study revealed the difficulties preservice teachers experienced due to their emotional beliefs ( Riesky, 2013 ). Dotger et al . (2011) simulated parent–teacher and preservice teacher conferences to examine preservice teachers’ emotions, with the findings suggesting that their emotional geography could be classified into three distinct frameworks: professional, moral, and political. These emotional geographies revealed that preservice teachers were most apprehensive when engaging with parents about their children or the school, especially when the parents exhibited various emotions (e.g., support, concern, frustration, and fury). Rejeki, Kristina, and Drajati (2018) profiled a female English instructor who taught in a rural location in Indonesia and developed an emotional geography sociocultural framework that depicted the participants’ feelings and discomfort about their cultural and social background and the rural environment in which they had been placed. Liu (2016) documented the experiences of an immigrant teacher in a professional community and how they overcame their emotional barriers to community understanding. These studies suggest that diverse emotional, physical, moral, sociocultural, professional, and political geographies shaped the teachers’ positive and negative feelings. Although numerous studies have examined the emotional experiences of preservice teachers during their teaching practicums ( Dotger et al ., 2011 ; Karunagaran & Saimin, 2019 ; Riesky, 2013 ; Thomas & O’Bannon, 2013 ), little attention has been given to their emotional geography as they interact with the students, their cooperating teachers, and other faculty members during their initial teacher education. Therefore, this study aims to investigate graduate preservice student teachers’ emotional geographies during their teaching practicums through Hargrave's emotional geography framework. Specifically, this study seeks to answer the following research question: 1. What types of emotional geographies (sociocultural, moral, professional, physical, and political) are experienced by Graduate Preservice Student Teachers (GPSTs) during their teaching practicum? 2. How do these emotional experiences influence GPSTs' teaching beliefs, teaching styles, and professional development during their practicum? Although prior studies have examined teachers’ emotional experiences with parents ( Chen & Wang, 2011 ; Sanhadi Rahayu & Asanti, 2021 ), students ( Hargreaves, 2000 ), colleagues ( Hargreaves, 2001a ), and principals ( Lassila et al ., 2017 ), little attention has been given to preservice teachers’ emotional geography during practicums. Thus, the current study addresses this gap. Addressing preservice teachers' emotions has the potential to strengthen emotional bonds between preservice student teachers, cooperating teachers, and students, allowing them to develop the emotional connections required for fruitful teaching practicums and professional learning experiences during their initial teacher education. Literature review Emotional geographies in teaching A teacher’s emotions are indicators that can be used to explore aspects beyond the teacher’s professional relationships ( Hargreaves, 2001a ). Teaching is not only a cognitive and behavioral practice where elaborating teaching depends only on what they know and what they should do in the class. Instead, teaching involves another factor, such as their feeling when teaching, which can be a help or a threat for their professionalism. A teacher’s experience of teaching can be affected by their relationships with the students ( Hargreaves, 2000 ), parents ( Hargreaves & Lasky, 2004 ), their colleagues ( Hargreaves, 2001a ), principals, and educational changes ( Hargreaves, 1998a , 1998b ), with the feelings from these relationships affecting teaching styles, judgments, and the conduct of the class learning activities. Therefore, understanding these positive and negative emotions related to teaching, could reveal the underlying decision-making and problem-solving contexts in the classroom. Understanding teacher emotions is important for teachers with extensive teaching experience and student teachers during their teaching practicum. Teaching practicums allow preservice teachers to experience a real class and apply the knowledge they have learned. Following teaching plans may not be as easy as one believes and may evoke positive and negative emotions depending on how the threats in the class are perceived. These stressful situations guide the problems that need to be overcome, and the feelings being experienced could lead to changes in preservice teachers’ perceptions, beliefs, and teaching styles ( Yuan & Lee, 2014 ). Graduate preservice student teachers Graduate preservice teachers (GPSTs) are graduate students enrolled in master’s degree programs who are required to complete their teaching practicums before graduation ( Geng et al ., 2016 ). Although the term ‘preservice teachers’ is widely used, the preservice teachers in this study were slightly different because they were studying for their master’s degrees rather than bachelor’s degrees. Graduate English education program students are required to complete a teaching practicum comprising three to five classes with undergraduate students in similar majors and to teach the classes similarly to the undergraduate student lecturers. These teaching practicums provide GPSTs with additional teaching experience by allowing them to teach undergraduate students whose characteristics differ distinctly from the secondary school students they taught as part of their bachelor’s degrees, thus increasing their knowledge about dealing with adult students and positioning them for possible future employment as lecturers ( Sunardi, 2018 ). Teaching emotions A classroom is an emotional place. The students spend endless hours attending class, finishing projects, taking tests, and building social relationships contributing to life goals—holding a degree in education today has been more personal, social, or financially significant. Emotions like curiosity, interest, hope, pride, rage, anxiety, shame, confusion, irritation, and tedium are common, prevalent, and intense in these contexts ( Pekrun & Linnenbrink-Garcia, 2015 ; Zhang & Zhu, 2008 ). The significance of emotions in education extends to teachers, principals, and administrators in equal measure. For instance, teachers are responsible not only for imparting knowledge but also for instilling a passion for the subject and enthusiasm for learning ( Pekrun & Linnenbrink-Garcia, 2015 ). Student teachers will learn emotions early in the teaching process, in this case, during their teaching practicum. Teaching practicum can project the real teaching atmosphere and give the student teacher valuable experiences to expose themselves to emotions in teaching. Typically, these feelings emerge when teachers' objectives, standards, and beliefs interact with those of other classroom participants during routine school activities ( Hargreaves, 1998a ). Thus, teachers experience various emotions, from happiness and pleasure when a lesson proceeds as intended to frustration and anger when working with difficult administrators ( Schutz, 2014 ; Sutton & Wheatley, 2003 ). If they successfully generate enthusiasm for the course material, the motivational effects should extend well beyond the course. However, failing to maintain good teaching by standards will lead them to feel anxiety or boredom. ( Pekrun & Linnenbrink-Garcia, 2015 ; Sutton & Harper, 2009 ; Titsworth et al ., 2010 ) Methods Ethics This study was approved by Universitas Mulawarman and Ethical Clearance Committee (Protocol Number: 061/UN17.5/PP/2020). Written informed consent was obtained from all participants. Participants This study investigated the emotional geographies of Graduate Pre-Service Student Teachers (GPSTs) majoring in English Education at Mulawarman University, who had finished their teaching practicum in 2019. There were 21 students who were first recruited and contacted for taking part in this study online via Zoom , but only 15 students were able to proceed with the interview. Six other students could not participate in this study due to limited access to the internet in their hometown as most of the students had returned home because of COVID-19 restrictions ( Ministry of Education and Culture of Indonesia, 2020 ). Participant profiles are shown in Table 1 . Table 1. GPST profile. No. Participant Teaching experience Current job 1 Participant 1 6 months Substitute junior high school teacher 2 Participant 2 >15 years Senior high school teacher and university lecturer 3 Participant 3 2 years English course instructor 4 Participant 4 2 years Senior high school teacher 5 Participant 5 2–3 years English course instructor 6 Participant 6 6 months Housewife 7 Participant 7 >2 years Junior high school teacher and university tutor 8 Participant 8 3 years General affairs officer 9 Participant 9 <6 months French tutor 10 Participant 10 <6 months Recent graduate 11 Participant 11 1 year Not working 12 Participant 12 6 years Junior and senior high school teacher 13 Participant 13 3 years Junior high school teacher 14 Participant 14 <6 months Entrepreneur 15 Participant 15 3 years Junior and senior high school teacher All participants were enrolled in the TESOL teacher training program and had various previous education and teaching experiences. Most participants had been teaching for several years, both in formal education (e.g., teaching at school) and informal education (e.g., teaching in an English course). In contrast, three participants were relatively new to teaching, especially teaching university students. Instruments This study used semi-structured interviews based on Hargreaves’ five emotional geography dimensions. The interview structure was designed specifically to explore the emotional geographies (RQ1) and their impact on teaching beliefs and styles (RQ2). Generally, the interviews are based on these main questions which are modified or lead to another suitable questions. The main questions are as follows: 1. Do you find any gap between you and your students, colleagues, or school administrators socially or culturally? What is that? And how do you feel about the gap? 2. Is there any difference between what you and your students believe morally? What is the difference? How do you feel about and deal with it? 3. Do your colleagues, school principal, or school administrators have different professional views from yours? Tell me more about it. 4. What do you think of the distance between you and your students? How do you posit yourself to your students? 5. Do you find any political gap between you and your supervisor or principal which put you in a weaker position? How do you feel about it? From these five questions, the authors derived additional questions based on responses from the participants, in order to drill down into their emotional geographies. These interview questions focussed on Hargreaves’ emotional geography framework to investigate the five emotional dimensions sociocultural, moral, professional, physical and political encountered by preservice teachers during practicum and directly answered the study’s research question. Research procedure This research was conducted from March to April 2020. Because of COVID-19 restrictions ( Ministry of Education and Culture of Indonesia, 2020 ), the thirty to sixty minute semi-structured interviews were conducted online via Zoom; with two interviews conducted for each participant. Then, the participants were contacted by the researcher (S) to ask for their willingness and availability to participate in the study. The researcher (S) took the participants’ contact information from the postgraduate program of English Education and he also provided the link for the Zoom meeting. There were 15 students who were able and available to attend an interview with the researcher (S). The first interview was exploring their emotional geographies and in the second interview, researchers verified the interview transcriptions with the participants to ensure their answers were recorded correctly. In both interviews, the participants voluntarily gave consent to the use of their experience as data for this research. These interviews were designed to gather in-depth qualitative data needed to answer the stated research questions regarding types of emotional geographies experienced and their influence on teaching beliefs and practices. The transcript was double-checked by the participant to ensure the result were accurate. Data analysis technique A phenomenological approach was adopted for data analysis and included three steps: coding the emotions, identifying and/or interpreting the causes of the reported emotions, and identifying the themes based on the emotional geography framework of Hargreaves (1998a) . A phenomenological approach was adopted because it best supports exploring participants’ lived experiences related to emotional geographies, directly aligning with the research questions. The data analysis systematically addressed the types of emotional geographies encountered (RQ1) and their influence on GPSTs’ professional development (RQ2). In the first coding emotion step, the interview transcripts were searched for passages that included information on teachers’ emotions, to which an emotional geography coding scheme was applied. The emotions (e.g., annoyance, happiness, and joy) were plotted as either positive or negative and coded accordingly. The second step in the analysis identified and/or inferred the cause of the participants’ reported emotions as reported by participants, the descriptions for which were paraphrased and described using qualitative content analysis. Statements describing similar causes were merged and a summary of the inferred causes was made for each identified emotion. This step involved scrutinizing the text passages within each code, such as motivation. The third step complemented the analysis by identifying the overall themes and the specific emotional geographies. The third level of analysis built on these results by determining the general storylines and the corresponding emotional mappings. A three-step phenomenological analysis allowed us to trace the emotional experiences and map them into the emotional geography dimensions provided by Hargreaves, answering the research question around the emotional geographies in which preservice teachers engaged during practicum sickness leaves. Results Hargreaves’ emotional geography framework was developed because teachers encounter scenarios that can result in positive and negative sociocultural, moral, professional, physical, and political emotions about their relationships with students, parents, colleagues, and the school principal throughout the teaching–learning process ( Chen and Wang, 2011 ; Hargreaves, 2000 , 2001a , 2001b ; Hargreaves & Lasky, 2004 ; Lassila et al ., 2017 ; Liu, 2016 ), which then lead to the development of distinct emotional geographies with other parties. Results of the GPSTs’ interview analyses revealed that the GPSTs had developed emotional distance and closeness from their interactions with the students and cooperating teacher, which had exposed them to all five emotional geographies, the occurrences of which were appended to the respective participant interviews. Sociocultural distance: ‘Punctuality is the students’ common problem’ Sociocultural distance typically develops because of differences in cultures, habits, social standing, and economic levels. In this case, all participants expressed negative feelings about the students’ lateness, that is, punctuality was found to be a source of unpleasant emotions (e.g., frustration, anger, and feeling distracted and upset) ( Prasetyarini et al ., 2021 ; Bataineh, 2014 ). The class was able to function normally with few late students; however, class activities were significantly disrupted when over half of the class was late. Most participants stated that they had planned specific tasks for the class, and if the class began late, it affected all activities in the teaching plan, making the participants irritable ( Zaid Bataineh, 2014 ). Explaining the materials again to the late students, which upset the participants’ concentration, was also necessary, as one participant stated: Actually, the most emotional part was in the first meeting of teaching practicum; when I started the class, there were around 10 students who attended the class; I asked the leader of the class where her friends were and she said that they were still in the canteen and in other places, and then I asked her to contact her friends because we had to start the class now. For me, yeah, I know it’s like Indonesian habit, yeah, perhaps. Yeah, they were late, and then I had to wait around 15 minutes, and not all of them came to class that day (Participant 1) This comment reveals that the GPST had experienced unpleasant emotions when the students were late as this had disrupted the lesson plan. However, most GPST participants felt that they had no right to be tough on the students because they were only graduate students, not lecturers ( Boyce, 1997 ). Therefore, the sociocultural distance associated with student tardiness resulted in the participants experiencing political distance. Moral distance: ‘I’m so distracted when they are busy on their phones’ The participants were inevitably confronted with moral distance when they interacted with the students. Moreover, the participants believed that the students occasionally had different moral aims in mind during the interactions. The GPST participants expected the students to listen and pay attention; however, they occasionally encountered students who did not do so, making them feel distracted and enraged, especially when they notice their students were more concerned with their phones, as stated by one participant: It’s really distracting because we are explaining in front of them and they focus on their phones, and we feel like they aren’t paying attention. We also wonder whether they understood the lesson because we don’t know their feelings about understanding the lesson, and if they were listening or not, so it was really distracting for me (Participant 5) Another participant added the following: While I was teaching, I saw that one student was busy on their cell phone. In my heart, I felt so furious, I felt so angry because I’d been preparing my material for 2 hours, but they played with their cell phone, hello! (Participant 14) Seeing the students ignore them in favor of their phones made them feel humiliated and disrespected ( Baker et al ., 2012 ; Smale et al ., 2021 ; Thomas & O’Bannon, 2013 ; Tindell & Bohlander, 2012 ). They felt that they had tried to do their best when teaching the class but had received disrespectful behavior in return. Inappropriate student behavior has commonly been reported as a source of negative feelings among preservice teachers ( Baker et al ., 2012 ; Karunagaran & Saimin, 2019 ; Thomas & O’Bannon, 2013 ) as they felt what they were doing was useless because they did not get the responses they wanted. Professional distance: ‘Am I competent enough to teach them?’ The most striking conclusion from this study is the emotional distance the participants felt about their professionalism. The GPST participants’ perceptions of their professional worth varied. The first point of contention was when they expressed doubts about their competence to educate the undergraduate students because the students had made them believe that their knowledge was insufficient. In response to this issue, the participants felt anxious during their initial period in the class and when teaching the students. As one participant stated, I get anxious right after thinking, ‘Will they like me?’ For example, will they accept me as their exchange teacher for the time I am going to teach them, but I am still a master’s degree student, so will they appreciate me? Will they accept me? I get this kind of feelings (Participant 10) Not only did the participants cast doubt on their competence but they also acknowledged that they had limited comprehension of the teaching content at times ( Agustiana, 2014 ). Consequently, the participants felt unable to respond when the students posed critical questions about issues. Another instance was when they believed they had not adequately prepared the content and lacked mastery of the material they had provided to the students. According to one participant, ‘Because there was a topic that I didn’t really understand, I tried to make my face look like I understood it and then I felt like no one noticed’ (Participant 3). Teachers should be well prepared for class and must comprehend and master the topics they are going to teach. However, preservice students occasionally have difficulties comprehending the content of their teaching materials and often do not have the time to talk with their cooperating teachers. These issues can cause students to have doubts and reservations about the teacher’s competence to instruct in the class and can affect subsequent lessons, even if the teachers are fully prepared afterwards. Therefore, teachers must be professionally prepared to create a favorable educational environment. Furthermore, the teaching practicums with undergraduate students majoring in English Education required the participants to communicate in English on daily basis. Regrettably, not all participants spoke English fluently and were therefore confronted with a professional divide, as commented on by one participant, ‘Maybe, generally, I have not been really satisfied with my speaking environment in the past years, something like that’ (Participant 13). The participant expressed dissatisfaction with their speaking ability, which they believed was insufficient ( Daud et al ., 2019 ). Owing to a lack of confidence in their ability to communicate in English, they felt incapable of teaching the students. From the students’ perspective, English majors need the lecturer to be proficient in English teaching techniques; therefore, they would not feel they were ideal models for effective English as a Foreign Language (EFL) teachers if the students felt that participants were not competent lecturers. The questioning of a teacher’s ability occurs regularly in Indonesia, primarily because many EFL teachers are non-native English speakers. Thus, students are hesitant to speak English if they are only taught through textbooks; therefore, Indonesian preservice teachers should prioritize the English abilities needed to assist them in their teaching, that is, English fluency is a must for EFL teachers ( Daud et al ., 2019 ). Another difficulty associated with professional distance was when the teacher’s plans did not align with the students’ qualities. Teachers are often confident that certain methods will be successful in the classroom; however, success is contingent upon whether these methods are appropriate for students. Therefore, professional distance occurs when reality does not match the teacher’s expectations, as reported by one participant: This sometimes happens in our teaching because I had already planned to apply this method; however, when I applied this method and it was not related to the situation in the classroom, I had to directly find another way to match my method and the classroom situation. For example, when I prepared to conduct a group activity, such as a presentation, I saw that only one group was actively joining the presentation, so I had to change and present an activity that could interest all students in the classroom (Participant 5) The teacher had arranged a group discussion and had anticipated that all students would fully participate; however, the classroom atmosphere or the students’ qualities did not align with the preplanned activities, meaning that the teacher had to choose whether to alter their activities or continue with them regardless of student engagement. When confronted with an unexpected event in the classroom, the decision to change activities needs to be made by the teacher based on their professional judgment, which also means that teachers should have alternative plans when their planned activities do not proceed as expected. Physical distance: ‘I was nervous as it was the first time I had taught undergraduate students’ When establishing an emotional bond between teachers and students, there inevitably needs to be an intimacy, regularity, and continuity of engagement between both parties ( Hargreaves, 2001b ). Physical closeness and distance are also related to the amount of time or space produced between the parties that interact ( Liu, 2016 ). The physical theme evolved because of the interactions between the participants and other stakeholders (i.e., the students, cooperating teachers, and administrative staff ). Three participants expressed anxiety when confronted with physical distance in their encounters with the students or the cooperating teachers. The first physical distance occurred when preservice teachers were teaching undergraduate students, with a majority reporting feeling apprehensive when standing in front of students their age ( Boyce, 1997 ). Their anxiety was because of a sense of inadequacy, unfamiliarity, and distrust. Their reactions to the physical distance were influenced by their first efforts at teaching in front of a class and by the professional distance they felt in the class ( Agustiana, 2014 ; Shah et al ., 2021 ; Zhu, 2017 ). Their uncertainty about their abilities and characteristics exacerbated their unfamiliarity with the students, which was why they were scared and experienced a physical distance from the students. As one participant stated: I think the biggest challenge for me was when I tried to explain something to them, given that was my first time teaching undergraduate students. I used to teach kids but not undergraduate students, so it was a big challenge. And then came the anxiety, right after I thought about whether they will like me? (Participant 10) The aforementioned participant was concerned that the students would reject them because they were only a master’s degree student. This sentiment was shared by the majority of GPST participants in this study who were fearful that the students would question their abilities as they were only novice undergraduate teachers. These difficulties resulted in a range of emotions, including anxiety and nervousness. Another difficulty related to physical distance occurred during the initial meeting of two participants with their cooperating teachers. Cooperating teachers are the classroom teachers with whom the participants needed to collaborate. Preservice teachers substitute for the cooperating teachers in three to five classes; therefore, maintaining a positive relationship with the cooperating teachers is a requirement so that the preservice teachers can discuss their concerns and seek and discuss solutions. However, not all participants had met their cooperating teachers in person, which created anxiety. As one participant put it: ‘My coordinator was Mrs. A, then I was first felt bit scared because I was not very familiar with my cooperating teacher’ (Participant 7) The participant encountered physical distance when communicating with their cooperating teacher because they had never met them ( Boyce, 1997 ). Similar problems were raised by other participants who had never previously communicated with their cooperating teacher. They felt awkward initiating communication with someone they did not know in person as they felt it was necessary to meet their coordinating teacher in person first before discussing the teaching practicum. However, building a personal attachment before the teaching practicum was slightly difficult because not all preservice teachers lived in the same city as the university and their cooperating teacher. Therefore, they tried to contact them using messenger or social media but still felt awkward. This physical distance, in some cases, led to political distance as they felt very nervous when teaching in front of their cooperating teacher. Physical closeness: ‘I’d like to be a friend with the students’ Surprising information was found related to physical geography concerning how the preservice teachers felt about their student interactions. The teachers frequently attempted to create distance between themselves and the students to retain their professionalism. However, most of the GPSTs in this study believed that developing a close relationship with the students enabled them to better accomplish their teaching objectives. As one participant stated, ‘I really like teaching and I like to blend with the students’ (Participant 6). Another participant added the following: I tried to be friends with some of them, although they may feel awkward to befriend me; however, some of them were just like I told you, now I’m now friends with one of the students (Participant 9) The participants believed that having personal contact with the students could gain their attention and respect; therefore, they attempted to develop positive relationships with the students through laughing, projecting a warm attitude, and providing personal communication. Even after the teaching practicum was completed, one participant stated that they enjoyed becoming friends with the students and developing relationships. The participants did not view their closeness to students to be a violation of their professionalism; rather, they felt that this closeness demonstrated their professionalism. It appeared that the study participants had divergent views on student–teacher interactions. Political distance: ‘I’m not even their real lecturer’ The final theme was political geography, which revealed the divergent views about the exercise of power ( Liu, 2016 ). Political distance was observed when the participants questioned their power or authority in the class or when the teaching practicum coordinators were observing them. Yeah, it happens. I asked the students an easy question, but there was no answer. I didn’t know if they really had no idea or they just were ignoring me because I was only a practicum teacher and not their real teacher. I was so angry because I felt disrespected. I wanted to go further, but I realized I had no authority for that as I was only a temporary lecturer for them, so I cannot exaggerate (Participant 15) This political distance made the GPST participants uneasy, which was also evident in their interactions with their cooperating teachers. They were nervous when they noticed the cooperating teacher, who they knew had greater power and authority, observing them in the class ( Boyce, 1997 ). In comparison, one participant experienced a sense of political intimacy when their cooperating teacher bestowed complete authority on them and allowed them to teach the class without being monitored. What I taught in only 15 minutes at the beginning of the class, I could explain clearly and briefly to the students; I could communicate and interact well with the students. But when the teacher entered the class, I suddenly forgot the material (Participant 13) Political distance was not found to only occur during the interactions between the participants and their cooperating teacher. Certain situations also made them feel helpless and had a major impact; however, they felt they could not deal with the situation. As one participant put it: Distractions in the classroom, such as from the students themselves or from the situation in the classroom, when I was conducting my teaching for the first time, the class was very hot because there was no air conditioning, so most students were not focusing and some people outside were being really noisy (Participant 5) Therefore, as aforementioned, many GPST participants felt powerless when the classroom environment was not conducive. Classroom settings and the environment can have a substantial impact on class activity ( Marzano & Marzano, 2003 ). Hot and noisy classrooms can be disruptive to both students and teachers and impair classroom activities ( Prasetyarini et al ., 2021 ). Therefore, the participant was unable to intervene because the classroom was hot and excessive noise was noted outside the classroom. The situation prevents students from concentrating on the materials provided by the participant. As a result, she maintains a political distance from the problem. Discussion After examining the negative and positive emotions experienced by the GPSTs when teaching undergraduate students in their teaching practicum, the results were examined more broadly in light of Hargreaves’ (2001b) emotional geography concepts to determine how these emotions related to their teaching paradigms, beliefs, and styles. The GPSTs were confronted with various unfavorable sociocultural, moral, professional, physical, and political emotional barriers throughout their teaching practicums. The first factor identified was sociocultural distance. Sociocultural distance is generally characterized by a separation of cultures, customs, social standing, and economic status ( Hargreaves, 2001b ). The GPST participants encountered a sociocultural distance because of the students’ punctuality, which was similar to the situation encountered by Ragawanti (2015) , who discovered that the preservice teachers’ challenges revolved around activity management, with the most common difficulty being activity timing. Unlike students in primary and secondary schools, who typically have a set classroom and exit only at recess, university students spend most of their time outside the classroom waiting for their class to begin, which means a higher possibility exists that the students will arrive late to class. Having students arrive late irritated and angered the GPSTs as the lateness was interpreted as being disrespectful toward their authority as the practicum teacher ( Prasetyarini et al ., 2021 ; Zaid Bataineh, 2014 ). Thus, they questioned their authority and ability to discipline students who were late. Late students also disrupted the participants’ lesson plans and their ability to complete their well-designed exercises within the allocated time ( Zaid Bataineh, 2014 ). Because many students arrived late to class, they wasted time and the GPSTs were unable to complete their planned tasks. These late student episodes made the GPSTs feel that teachers should be rigorous when abiding by class regulations and that students should understand the implications of their tardiness and its effect on class activities. Consequently, the GPST participants chose to enforce stringent time limits and advised students that they would be unable to follow the class if they arrived late ( Prasetyarini et al ., 2021 ). Therefore, the GPSTs discovered that tight classroom regulations were necessary to ensure student punctuality. The GPSTs felt moral distance when their aims differed from those of the students. Teachers may encounter student ignorance, excessive noise, silence ( Ragawanti, 2015 ), and even poor behavior ( Karunagaran & Saimin, 2019 ). The GPSTs said that they experienced feelings of moral distance when they observe that students’ attention was more focused on their phones than on their lessons, which they felt was disrespectful behavior. They admitted to being enraged, agitated, and preoccupied with the situation and believed that even though they had planned and prepared everything necessary to teach the students, the students lacked respect for them as teachers. This moral distance encouraged the GPSTs to perceive the situation from both their and the students’ perspectives because they wanted to understand why the students disregarded them and preferred to play games on their phones than listen to the lesson ( Baker et al ., 2012 ; Smale et al ., 2021 ; Thomas & O’Bannon, 2013 ; Tindell & Bohlander, 2012 ). Many of the GPSTs believed that it was either their teaching style that was boring the students or that their prepared activities were not suitably engaging. These beliefs compelled the preservice student teachers to admit that they needed to adapt their teaching approaches to make them more appropriate and appealing to the students in order to avoid boredom ( Karunagaran & Saimin, 2019 ). Professional geographies are formed when professional definitions and norms either divide the involved parties or allow them to collaborate on professional concerns. The GPSTs reported feeling professional distance in their relationships with their students and experienced certain emotions because they (1) had doubts about their abilities, (2) had not mastered the content, and (3) could not communicate fluently in English. The first difficulty arose when they mistrusted their abilities to teach the students. Most GPSTs in this study expressed similar concerns about the student’s perceptions of their abilities and were fearful that if they could not teach well, they would be ignored ( Daud et al ., 2019 ) and that their knowledge was insufficient to facilitate learning, all of which gave rise to anxiety, worry, and nervousness when teaching. The second difficulty was because many of the GPSTs struggled to master the subject matter they were assigned to teach, and those who were confronted with this issue acknowledged that they lacked a thorough understanding of both the subject and the materials. While most attempted to comprehend the material, many were unable to do so but pretended to know it to avoid answering student inquiries ( Agustiana, 2014 ). This was a legitimate concern regarding their professionalism. Teachers should be confident about their materials and activities before entering the class as this confidence can make it easier to control the class. Therefore, neglecting to master the content could foster a dislike toward the teacher. The GPSTs in this study acknowledged that they required additional time to become acquainted with the materials; however, most claimed that they had had only a limited amount of time to prepare and were therefore unable to do their best. They also assumed that learning the content would help them control their negative emotions in front of the students. Finally, the participants expressed dissatisfaction with their speaking abilities as a result of the professional distance ( Daud et al ., 2019 ). As EFL teachers, they were obligated to communicate in English; however, not all GPSTs in this study could communicate fluently in English, making them feel embarrassed and dissatisfied with their competence, primarily because most believed that English major students should have excellent teachers that can serve as EFL teacher role models. Most participants had shattered expectations because of their inability to communicate fluently with the students, enabling them to be aware of the necessity to practice their speaking in order to improve their teaching effectiveness as EFL teachers. Physical geographies are concerned with time and place and connect or reduce relationships ( Hargreaves, 2001b ). The GPSTs encountered both physical distance and closeness in their interactions with the students and the cooperating teacher. They reported feeling apprehensive when teaching for the first time ( Agustiana, 2014 ; Shah et al ., 2021 ; Zhu, 2017 ), with their anxiety being exacerbated by their doubts about their ability to instruct the undergraduate students. A similar feeling occurred when they were required to communicate with their cooperating teachers for the first time. Several participants acknowledged that they had never met their cooperating teachers in person, which made contacting them initially awkward; however, this physical distance occurred only during the earliest stages of the relationship as they became calmer and more capable of reducing the physical gap when they had become better acquainted with the students and the cooperating teachers. The participants perceived physical closeness during their teacher–student interactions despite their physical distance from the students. Most GPST participants believed that becoming better connected to the students as friends could assist them in maintaining class control. However, these beliefs contradict an earlier study that found that teachers preferred to maintain a professional distance between themselves and their students to remain professional ( Liu, 2016 ). However, the GPSTs in this study defined professionalism differently than typical teachers, believing that being personally appealing and easy to g et al ong with would be of benefit in their future careers. They felt that they needed to treat the undergraduate students differently because these students were adults who, unlike children and adolescents, could not be managed only by punishments or rewards. Given these disparate features, the GPST participants concluded that they needed to become friends with the students to enjoy the class and ensure success with the class activities. The final theme was political geography, which is related to divergent views of power ( Liu, 2016 ). The GPSTs reported experiencing unpleasant emotions when confronted with certain concerns (e.g., their authority in class, being observed by the cooperating teachers, and their inability to change unfavorable circumstances). The first political distance issue was inextricably linked to moral distance when the participants experienced negative feelings from the students’ behavior and powerlessness to intervene because they believed they lacked authority. Another concern was when the cooperating teachers were observing the participants ( Agustiana, 2014 ; Boyce, 1997 ), with most GPSTs admitting that being monitored made them feel restricted because they were fearful of making errors ( Daud et al ., 2019 ). Several participants stated that they had been trembling when the cooperating teachers were observing them teach. However, most also felt that the observations made by the cooperating teachers’ could assist them. The final point was about the sense of impotence the GPSTs felt when confronted with unfavorable circumstances, the participants in this study complaint about the external factors like uncomfortable classroom which lead them to feel powerless since they have no authority or power to solve the problems. Limitation and implication The study has several limitations. First, the sample was drawn from one class of master’s degree students, resulting in a relatively homogeneous group that may not capture the full variance of emotional experiences. Second, data collection via Zoom introduced challenges (e.g., poor internet connectivity) that occasionally led to misunderstandings during interviews, rendering some responses partially unusable. Consequently, future research should adopt a mixed-method approach—beginning with a survey followed by face-to-face interviews—to capture a broader range of experiences and clarify responses immediately. Additionally, further studies should explore the coping strategies (self-regulation) employed by graduate preservice teachers to provide richer insights into their professional development. On the basis of this constraint, the researchers suggest that future studies conduct face-to-face interviews with the participants in order to clarify any misconceptions immediately. Furthermore, since this study relied on pre-service teachers' experienced during the teaching practicums which emphasized on their feelings only, it will be a better enrichment when the future research can correlate their experience with the way they cope with it, so called their self-regulation. Conclusion This study validates the use of Hargreaves’ emotional geography framework to map the beliefs, paradigms, and teaching styles of graduate preservice teachers. Although the concept has been applied in various educational contexts, its application in preservice research remains limited. The findings indicate that both positive and negative emotional experiences during teaching practicums significantly shape future teaching practices. Negative emotions, which often lead to emotional distance, can prompt adaptations in teaching style and discipline strategies, while efforts to foster closeness with students may enhance classroom control and engagement. These insights underscore the importance of incorporating training on emotional self-regulation and adaptive pedagogical strategies into teacher education programs, along with ongoing professional development, reflective practices, and technology integration. The teaching practicums with undergraduate students engendered some negative emotions, resulting in emotional distance. However, participants claimed that they could use these unpleasant emotions to improve their teaching styles and beliefs, concluding that teachers needed to maintain class discipline. Most also believed that teachers needed to present materials appealingly to avoid student boredom, that teachers should make friends with the students to maintain control in the classroom, and that thorough preparation was necessary to instill confidence in the students and be able to respond to their questions. Overall, however, both the positive and negative emotions experienced during their teaching practicum with the undergraduate students provided the GPST participants with significant experiences that will benefit them in their future careers. Data availability Underlying data Figshare: Interview Transcript of Graduate Student Teachers, https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.22276717.v2 ( Sunardi et al ., 2023a ). This project contains the following underlying data: • Interview with Graduate Student (Participant 1).docx • Interview with Graduate Student (Participant 2).docx • Interview with Graduate Student (Participant 3).docx • Interview with Graduate Student (Participant 4).docx • Interview with Graduate Student (Participant 5).docx • Interview with Graduate Student (Participant 6).docx • Interview with Graduate Student (Participant 7).docx • Interview with Graduate Student (Participant 8).docx • Interview with Graduate Student (Participant 9).docx • Interview with Graduate Student (Participant 10).docx • Interview with Graduate Student (Participant 11).docx • Interview with Graduate Student (Participant 12).docx • Interview with Graduate Student (Participant 13).docx • Interview with Graduate Student (Participant 14).docx • Interview with Graduate Student (Participant 15).docx Extended data Figshare: Analyzed Interview Transcript, https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.22191286.v2 ( Sunardi et al ., 2023b ). This project contains the following extended data: • Emotional Geographies fix.xlsx Data are available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license (CC-BY 4.0). Acknowledgments The authors would like to acknowledge the Faculty of Teacher Training and Educational Studies, Universitas Mulawarman, Indonesia. References Adodo SO: Effect of Mind-Mapping as a Self-Regulated Learning Strategy on Students’ Achievement in Basic Science and Technology. Mediterr. J. Soc. Sci. 2013; 4 (6): 163–172. Publisher Full Text Agustiana V: Pre-Service Teachers’ Anxiety during Teaching Practicum. English Review: Journal of English Education. 2014; 2 (2): 174–182. Alkharusi H, Kazem AM, Al-Musawai A: Knowledge, Skills, and Attitudes of Preservice and Inservice Teachers in Educational Measurement. Asia Pac. J. Teach. Educ. 2011; 39 (2): 113–123. Publisher Full Text Baker WM, Lusk EJ, Neuhauser KL: On the Use of Cell Phones and Other Electronic Devices in the Classroom: Evidence From a Survey of Faculty and Students. J. Educ. Bus. 2012; 87 (5): 275–289. Publisher Full Text Bhargava A, Pathy M: Attitude of Student Teachers Towards Teaching Profession. Turk. Online J. Dist. Educ. 2014; 15 (3): 27–36. Publisher Full Text Boyce BA: Inappropriate Student Behavior—A Problem for Student Teachers. Journal of Physical Education, Recreation & Dance. 1997; 68 (6): 28–30. Publisher Full Text Chen HJ, Wang YH: Emotional Geographies of Teacher-Parent Relations: Three Teachers’ Perceptions in Taiwan. Asia Pac. Educ. Rev. 2011; 12 (2): 185–195. Publisher Full Text Daud A, Ras F, Novitri N, et al. : Factors Contributing to Speaking Anxiety: A Case Study of Pre-Service English Teachers. J. Educ. Sci. 2019; 3 (3): 412. Publisher Full Text Dotger BH, Harris S, Maher M, et al. : Exploring the Emotional Geographies of Parent–Teacher Candidate Interactions: An Emerging Signature Pedagogy. Teach. Educ. 2011; 46 (3): 208–230. Publisher Full Text Geng G, Midford R, Buckworth J: Comparing stress levels of graduate and undergraduate pre-service teachers following their teaching practicums. Aust. J. Teach. Educ. (Online). 2016; 41 (9): 100–116. Publisher Full Text Hargreaves A: The Emotional Practice of Teaching. Teach. Teach. Educ. 1998a; 14 (8): 835–854. Publisher Full Text Hargreaves A: The Emotions of Teaching and Educational Change. International Handbook of Educational Change: Part One. Hargreaves A, Lieberman A, Fullan M, et al. , editors. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands; 1998b; 558–575. Hargreaves A: Mixed Emotions: Teachers’ Perceptions of Their Interactions with Students. Teach. Teach. Educ. 2000; 16 (8): 811–826. Publisher Full Text Hargreaves A: The Emotional Geographies of Teachers’ Relations with Colleagues. Int. J. Educ. Res. 2001a; 35 (5): 503–527. Publisher Full Text Hargreaves A: Emotional Geographies of Teaching. Teach. Coll. Rec. 2001b; 103 (6): 1056–1080. Publisher Full Text Hargreaves A, Lasky S: The Parent Gap: The Emotional Geographies of Teacher-Parent Relationships. Social Geographies of Educational Change. Hernandez F, Goodson IF, editors. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands; 2004; 103–122. Hargreaves A, Tucker E: Teaching and Guilt: Exploring the Feelings of Teaching. Teach. Teach. Educ. 1991; 7 (5): 491–505. Publisher Full Text Hargreaves A, Shirley DL: The global fourth way: The quest for educational excellence. Corwin Press; 2012. Hascher T, Hagenauer G: Openness to Theory and Its Importance for Pre-Service Teachers’ Self-Efficacy, Emotions, and Classroom Behaviour in the Teaching Practicum. Int. J. Educ. Res. 2016; 77 (December): 15–25. Publisher Full Text Kaldi S, Xafakos E: Student Teachers’ School Teaching Practice: The Relation Amongst Perceived Self-Competence, Motivation and Sources of Support. Teach. Teach. Educ. 2017; 67 : 246–258. Publisher Full Text Karunagaran V, Saimin R: Challenges of Pre-Service Teachers during Teaching Practice: A Case Study. Infrastructure University Kuala Lumpur Research Journal. 2019; 7 (2): 64–72. Kumazawa M: Gaps too large: Four novice EFL teachers’ self-concept and motivation. Teach. Teach. Educ. 2013; 33 : 45–55. Publisher Full Text Lassila ET, Timonen V, Uitto M, et al. : Storied Emotional Distances in the Relationships between Beginning Teachers and School Principals. Br. Educ. Res. J. 2017; 43 (3): 486–504. Publisher Full Text Lipka RP, Brinthaupt TM: Role of Self in Teacher Development, The. Suny Press; 1999. Liu Y: The Emotional Geographies of Language Teaching. Teach. Dev. 2016; 20 (4): 482–497. Publisher Full Text Marzano RJ, Marzano JS: The key to classroom management. Educ. Leadersh. 2003; 61 (1): 6–13. Milner HR, Flowers LA, Moore E Jr, et al. : Preservice Teachers' Awareness of Multiculturalism and Diversity. High Sch. J. 2003; 87 (1): 63–70. Publisher Full Text Ministry of Education and Culture of Indonesia: Mendikbud Terbitkan SE tentang Pelaksanaan Pendidikan dalam Masa Darurat Covid-19. 2020, March 24. Reference Source Mule L: Preservice Teachers’ Inquiry in a Professional Development School Context: Implications for the Practicum. Teach. Teach. Educ. 2006; 22 (2): 205–218. Publisher Full Text Pekrun R, Linnenbrink-Garcia L: Introduction to Emotions in Education. International Handbook of Emotions in Education. Routledge; 2015; Publisher Full Text Petrovici C, Masari GA: Aligning the Academic Teacher Training Curriculum for Preschool and Primary School Education to the Requirements of the RNCIS. Procedia. Soc. Behav. Sci. 2014; 142 : 731–737. Publisher Full Text Prasetyarini A, Hikmat MH, Thoyibi M: Strategies to Cope With Students’ Discipline Problems in Senior High School. Indonesian Journal on Learning and Advanced Education (IJOLAE). 2021; 3 (1): 40–47. Publisher Full Text Ragawanti DT: Cultivating Pre-Service Teachers’ Classroom Management Skills through Teaching Practicum: A Reflective Practice. TEFLIN Journal. 2015; 26 (1): 117–128. Publisher Full Text Rejeki S, Kristina D, Drajati NA: Sociocultural Framework: Emotional Geographies of a Female EFL Teacher in 3T Area. Paper presented at the English Language and Literature International Conference (ELLiC) Proceedings. 2018. Riesky R: How English Student Teachers Deal with Teaching Difficulties in Their Teaching Practicum. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics. 2013; 2 (2): 250–261. Publisher Full Text Sanhadi Rahayu FE, Asanti C: Emotional geographies of teaching online classes during COVID-19 pandemic: a case study of Indonesian first-grade elementary school teachers. Educ. 3-13. 2021; 1–13. Publisher Full Text Schutz PA: Inquiry on Teachers’ Emotion. Educ. Psychol. 2014; 49 (1): 1–12. Publisher Full Text Shah MA, Ahmad SM, Bibi W, et al. : An Overview of Prospective Teachers Teaching Practicum Challenges in District Peshawar, Pakistan 2021; 15 (8): 410–421. Smale WT, Hutcheson R, Russo CJ: Cell Phones, Student Rights, and School Safety: Finding the Right Balance. Canadian Journal of Educational Administration and Policy. 2021; 195 : 49–64. Publisher Full Text Sun J, van Es EA : An Exploratory Study of the Influence That Analyzing Teaching Has on Preservice Teachers’ Classroom Practice. J. Teach. Educ. 2015; 66 (3): 201–214. Publisher Full Text Sunardi: Teaching Practicum and Supervision Guideline for Master of English Education Mulawarman University.2018. on May, the 25th 2022. Reference Source Sunardi S, Rahayu S, Eka F: Interview Transcript of Graduate Pre-Service Student Teachers. Dataset. figshare. 2023a. Publisher Full Text Sunardi S, Rahayu S, Eka F: Analyzed interview transcript. Dataset. figshare. 2023b. Publisher Full Text Sutton RE, Harper E: Teacher’s Emotion Regulation.Saha LJ, Dworkin AG, editors. International Handbook of Research on Teachers and Teaching. Springer; 2009; (Vol. 21 . , pp. 389–402). Sutton RE, Wheatley KF: Teachers’ Emotions and Teaching: A Review of the Literature and Directions for Future Research. Educ. Psychol. Rev. 2003; 15 (4): 327–358. Publisher Full Text Thomas K, O’Bannon B: Cell Phones in the Classroom: Preservice Teachers’ Perceptions. J. Digit. Learn. Teach. Educ. 2013; 30 (1): 11–20. Publisher Full Text Tindell DR, Bohlander RW: The Use and Abuse of Cell Phones and Text Messaging in the Classroom: A Survey of College Students. Coll. Teach. 2012; 60 (1): 1–9. Publisher Full Text Titsworth S, Quinlan MM, Mazer JP: Emotion in teaching and learning: Development and validation of the classroom emotions scale. Commun. Educ. 2010; 59 (4): 431–452. Publisher Full Text Valli P, Perkkilä P, Valli R: How Can I Be a Better Teacher? Development of Finnish Adult Pre- service Teachers’ Pedagogical Thinking. Procedia. Soc. Behav. Sci. 2013; 106 : 1306–1320. Publisher Full Text Walton E, Rusznyak L: Pre-Service Teachers’ Pedagogical Learning during Practicum Placements in Special Schools. Teach. Teach. Educ. 2013; 36 : 112–120. Publisher Full Text Yuan R, Lee I: Pre-service teachers' changing beliefs in the teaching practicum: Three cases in an EFL context. System. 2014; 44 : 1–12. Publisher Full Text Zaid Bataineh M: Journal of Education and Practice. 2014; 5 (2). www.iiste.org Zhang Q, Zhu W: Exploring emotion in teaching: Emotional labor, burnout, and satisfaction in Chinese higher education. Commun. Educ. 2008; 57 (1): 105–122. Publisher Full Text Zhu G: Chinese Student Teachers’ Perspectives on Becoming a Teacher in the Practicum: Emotional and Ethical Dimensions of Identity Shaping. J. Educ. Teach. 2017; 43 (4): 1–495. Publisher Full Text Comments on this article Comments (0) Version 3 VERSION 3 PUBLISHED 16 May 2023 ADD YOUR COMMENT Comment Author details Author details 1 English Language Department of Teacher Training and Education Faculty, Universitas Mulawarman, Samarinda, East Kalimantan, 75123, Indonesia 2 English Literature of Cultural Science Faculty, Universitas Mulawarman, Samarinda, East Kalimantan, 75123, Indonesia Sunardi Sunardi Roles: Conceptualization, Methodology, Project Administration, Resources, Supervision, Writing – Review & Editing Famala Eka Sanhadi Rahayu Roles: Data Curation, Formal Analysis, Methodology, Writing – Original Draft Preparation, Writing – Review & Editing Desy Rusmawaty Roles: Supervision, Validation Istanti Hermagustiana Roles: Supervision, Validation Dyah Sunggingwati Roles: Supervision, Validation, Writing – Review & Editing Competing interests No competing interests were disclosed. Grant information This project was supported by Teacher Training and Education Faculty of Mulawarman University with Grant Number 935/SK/2020. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript. Article Versions (3) version 3 Revised Published: 06 May 2025, 12:505 https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.132112.3 version 2 Revised Published: 11 Apr 2025, 12:505 https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.132112.2 version 1 Published: 16 May 2023, 12:505 https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.132112.1 Copyright © 2025 Sunardi S et al . This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Download Export To Sciwheel Bibtex EndNote ProCite Ref. Manager (RIS) Sente metrics Views Downloads F1000Research - - PubMed Central info_outline Data from PMC are received and updated monthly. - - Citations open_in_new 0 open_in_new 0 open_in_new SEE MORE DETAILS CITE how to cite this article Sunardi S, Rahayu FES, Rusmawaty D et al. A phenomenological analysis of the emotional experiences of graduate preservice student teachers in Indonesia [version 3; peer review: 2 approved] . F1000Research 2025, 12 :505 ( https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.132112.3 ) NOTE: If applicable, it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article. COPY CITATION DETAILS track receive updates on this article Track an article to receive email alerts on any updates to this article. TRACK THIS ARTICLE Share Open Peer Review Current Reviewer Status: ? Key to Reviewer Statuses VIEW HIDE Approved The paper is scientifically sound in its current form and only minor, if any, improvements are suggested Approved with reservations A number of small changes, sometimes more significant revisions are required to address specific details and improve the papers academic merit. Not approved Fundamental flaws in the paper seriously undermine the findings and conclusions Version 3 VERSION 3 PUBLISHED 06 May 2025 Revised Views 0 Cite How to cite this report: Gao X. Reviewer Report For: A phenomenological analysis of the emotional experiences of graduate preservice student teachers in Indonesia [version 3; peer review: 2 approved] . F1000Research 2025, 12 :505 ( https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.181229.r383098 ) The direct URL for this report is: https://f1000research.com/articles/12-505/v3#referee-response-383098 NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in this citation. Close Copy Citation Details Reviewer Report 13 May 2025 Xuesong Gao , The University of New South Wales, New South Wales, Australia Approved VIEWS 0 https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.181229.r383098 I have no further ... Continue reading READ ALL I have no further issue with the study. Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed. Reviewer Expertise: language teacher education I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard. Close READ LESS CITE CITE HOW TO CITE THIS REPORT Gao X. Reviewer Report For: A phenomenological analysis of the emotional experiences of graduate preservice student teachers in Indonesia [version 3; peer review: 2 approved] . F1000Research 2025, 12 :505 ( https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.181229.r383098 ) The direct URL for this report is: https://f1000research.com/articles/12-505/v3#referee-response-383098 NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article. COPY CITATION DETAILS Report a concern Respond or Comment COMMENT ON THIS REPORT Version 2 VERSION 2 PUBLISHED 11 Apr 2025 Revised Views 0 Cite How to cite this report: Gao X. Reviewer Report For: A phenomenological analysis of the emotional experiences of graduate preservice student teachers in Indonesia [version 3; peer review: 2 approved] . F1000Research 2025, 12 :505 ( https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.178867.r378436 ) The direct URL for this report is: https://f1000research.com/articles/12-505/v2#referee-response-378436 NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in this citation. Close Copy Citation Details Reviewer Report 24 Apr 2025 Xuesong Gao , The University of New South Wales, New South Wales, Australia Approved with Reservations VIEWS 0 https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.178867.r378436 I suggest that the authors include research questions that were addressed in the study. Research question(s) should be well motivated by the literature review (and introduction) and presented separated from the rest of writing to be more visible. In ... Continue reading READ ALL I suggest that the authors include research questions that were addressed in the study. Research question(s) should be well motivated by the literature review (and introduction) and presented separated from the rest of writing to be more visible. In the methodology section, it should be made clear how the data were collected and analyzed to answer the research question(s). Without reference to the research question(s), it is difficult for this reader to appreciate whether the study has achieved what it was supposed to achieve. Is the work clearly and accurately presented and does it cite the current literature? Yes Is the study design appropriate and is the work technically sound? Yes Are sufficient details of methods and analysis provided to allow replication by others? Partly If applicable, is the statistical analysis and its interpretation appropriate? Not applicable Are all the source data underlying the results available to ensure full reproducibility? Yes Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the results? Yes Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed. Reviewer Expertise: language teacher education I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard, however I have significant reservations, as outlined above. Close READ LESS CITE CITE HOW TO CITE THIS REPORT Gao X. Reviewer Report For: A phenomenological analysis of the emotional experiences of graduate preservice student teachers in Indonesia [version 3; peer review: 2 approved] . F1000Research 2025, 12 :505 ( https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.178867.r378436 ) The direct URL for this report is: https://f1000research.com/articles/12-505/v2#referee-response-378436 NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article. COPY CITATION DETAILS Report a concern Author Response 09 May 2025 Famala Eka Sanhadi Rahayu , English Literature of Cultural Science Faculty, Universitas Mulawarman, Samarinda, 75123, Indonesia 09 May 2025 Author Response Dear Reviewer We sincerely thank the reviewer for the insightful and constructive feedback provided. In response to the comments, we have carefully revised the manuscript to enhance its clarity, structure, ... Continue reading Dear Reviewer We sincerely thank the reviewer for the insightful and constructive feedback provided. In response to the comments, we have carefully revised the manuscript to enhance its clarity, structure, and alignment with the study's objectives. The revisions undertaken are as follows: 1. Addition of Explicit Research Questions (Separated and Clearly Visible) To address the reviewer's suggestion, we have inserted a new section titled “Research Questions” immediately following the Introduction and preceding the Literature Review. This section explicitly states the two research questions that guide the study. Revision Inserted: Research Questions This study is guided by the following research questions: What types of emotional geographies (sociocultural, moral, professional, physical, and political) are experienced by Graduate Preservice Student Teachers (GPSTs) during their teaching practicum? How do these emotional experiences influence GPSTs' teaching beliefs, teaching styles, and professional development during their practicum? 2. Stronger Motivation of Research Questions from the Introduction We have refined the concluding paragraphs of the Introduction to more clearly highlight the research gap and to lead logically into the formulation of the research questions. Revision Inserted at the End of Introduction: Although prior studies have examined teachers’ emotional experiences with parents (Chen & Wang, 2011; Sanhadi Rahayu & Asanti, 2021), students (Hargreaves, 2000), colleagues (Hargreaves, 2001a), and principals (Lassila et al., 2017), little attention has been given to preservice teachers’ emotional geography during practicums. Thus, the current study addresses this gap. 3. Clarification of Data Collection and Analysis in Relation to the Research Questions To enhance clarity, we have explicitly detailed in the Methods section how the data collection and analysis procedures were designed to address the research questions. Revision Inserted into Instruments Subsection: This study used semi-structured interviews based on Hargreaves' five emotional geography dimensions. The interview structure was designed specifically to explore the emotional geographies (RQ1) and their impact on teaching beliefs and styles (RQ2). Revision Inserted into Research Procedure Subsection: These interviews were designed to gather in-depth qualitative data needed to answer the stated research questions regarding types of emotional geographies experienced and their influence on teaching beliefs and practices. Revision Inserted into Data Analysis Technique Subsection: A phenomenological approach was adopted because it best supports exploring participants' lived experiences related to emotional geographies, directly aligning with the research questions. The data analysis systematically addressed the types of emotional geographies encountered (RQ1) and their influence on GPSTs’ professional development (RQ2). We hope that these revisions have sufficiently addressed the reviewer’s concerns and improved the overall clarity and rigor of the manuscript. All changes have been clearly marked in the revised manuscript for ease of review. Dear Reviewer We sincerely thank the reviewer for the insightful and constructive feedback provided. In response to the comments, we have carefully revised the manuscript to enhance its clarity, structure, and alignment with the study's objectives. The revisions undertaken are as follows: 1. Addition of Explicit Research Questions (Separated and Clearly Visible) To address the reviewer's suggestion, we have inserted a new section titled “Research Questions” immediately following the Introduction and preceding the Literature Review. This section explicitly states the two research questions that guide the study. Revision Inserted: Research Questions This study is guided by the following research questions: What types of emotional geographies (sociocultural, moral, professional, physical, and political) are experienced by Graduate Preservice Student Teachers (GPSTs) during their teaching practicum? How do these emotional experiences influence GPSTs' teaching beliefs, teaching styles, and professional development during their practicum? 2. Stronger Motivation of Research Questions from the Introduction We have refined the concluding paragraphs of the Introduction to more clearly highlight the research gap and to lead logically into the formulation of the research questions. Revision Inserted at the End of Introduction: Although prior studies have examined teachers’ emotional experiences with parents (Chen & Wang, 2011; Sanhadi Rahayu & Asanti, 2021), students (Hargreaves, 2000), colleagues (Hargreaves, 2001a), and principals (Lassila et al., 2017), little attention has been given to preservice teachers’ emotional geography during practicums. Thus, the current study addresses this gap. 3. Clarification of Data Collection and Analysis in Relation to the Research Questions To enhance clarity, we have explicitly detailed in the Methods section how the data collection and analysis procedures were designed to address the research questions. Revision Inserted into Instruments Subsection: This study used semi-structured interviews based on Hargreaves' five emotional geography dimensions. The interview structure was designed specifically to explore the emotional geographies (RQ1) and their impact on teaching beliefs and styles (RQ2). Revision Inserted into Research Procedure Subsection: These interviews were designed to gather in-depth qualitative data needed to answer the stated research questions regarding types of emotional geographies experienced and their influence on teaching beliefs and practices. Revision Inserted into Data Analysis Technique Subsection: A phenomenological approach was adopted because it best supports exploring participants' lived experiences related to emotional geographies, directly aligning with the research questions. The data analysis systematically addressed the types of emotional geographies encountered (RQ1) and their influence on GPSTs’ professional development (RQ2). We hope that these revisions have sufficiently addressed the reviewer’s concerns and improved the overall clarity and rigor of the manuscript. All changes have been clearly marked in the revised manuscript for ease of review. Competing Interests: There is no competing interests. Close Report a concern Respond or Comment COMMENTS ON THIS REPORT Author Response 09 May 2025 Famala Eka Sanhadi Rahayu , English Literature of Cultural Science Faculty, Universitas Mulawarman, Samarinda, 75123, Indonesia 09 May 2025 Author Response Dear Reviewer We sincerely thank the reviewer for the insightful and constructive feedback provided. In response to the comments, we have carefully revised the manuscript to enhance its clarity, structure, ... Continue reading Dear Reviewer We sincerely thank the reviewer for the insightful and constructive feedback provided. In response to the comments, we have carefully revised the manuscript to enhance its clarity, structure, and alignment with the study's objectives. The revisions undertaken are as follows: 1. Addition of Explicit Research Questions (Separated and Clearly Visible) To address the reviewer's suggestion, we have inserted a new section titled “Research Questions” immediately following the Introduction and preceding the Literature Review. This section explicitly states the two research questions that guide the study. Revision Inserted: Research Questions This study is guided by the following research questions: What types of emotional geographies (sociocultural, moral, professional, physical, and political) are experienced by Graduate Preservice Student Teachers (GPSTs) during their teaching practicum? How do these emotional experiences influence GPSTs' teaching beliefs, teaching styles, and professional development during their practicum? 2. Stronger Motivation of Research Questions from the Introduction We have refined the concluding paragraphs of the Introduction to more clearly highlight the research gap and to lead logically into the formulation of the research questions. Revision Inserted at the End of Introduction: Although prior studies have examined teachers’ emotional experiences with parents (Chen & Wang, 2011; Sanhadi Rahayu & Asanti, 2021), students (Hargreaves, 2000), colleagues (Hargreaves, 2001a), and principals (Lassila et al., 2017), little attention has been given to preservice teachers’ emotional geography during practicums. Thus, the current study addresses this gap. 3. Clarification of Data Collection and Analysis in Relation to the Research Questions To enhance clarity, we have explicitly detailed in the Methods section how the data collection and analysis procedures were designed to address the research questions. Revision Inserted into Instruments Subsection: This study used semi-structured interviews based on Hargreaves' five emotional geography dimensions. The interview structure was designed specifically to explore the emotional geographies (RQ1) and their impact on teaching beliefs and styles (RQ2). Revision Inserted into Research Procedure Subsection: These interviews were designed to gather in-depth qualitative data needed to answer the stated research questions regarding types of emotional geographies experienced and their influence on teaching beliefs and practices. Revision Inserted into Data Analysis Technique Subsection: A phenomenological approach was adopted because it best supports exploring participants' lived experiences related to emotional geographies, directly aligning with the research questions. The data analysis systematically addressed the types of emotional geographies encountered (RQ1) and their influence on GPSTs’ professional development (RQ2). We hope that these revisions have sufficiently addressed the reviewer’s concerns and improved the overall clarity and rigor of the manuscript. All changes have been clearly marked in the revised manuscript for ease of review. Dear Reviewer We sincerely thank the reviewer for the insightful and constructive feedback provided. In response to the comments, we have carefully revised the manuscript to enhance its clarity, structure, and alignment with the study's objectives. The revisions undertaken are as follows: 1. Addition of Explicit Research Questions (Separated and Clearly Visible) To address the reviewer's suggestion, we have inserted a new section titled “Research Questions” immediately following the Introduction and preceding the Literature Review. This section explicitly states the two research questions that guide the study. Revision Inserted: Research Questions This study is guided by the following research questions: What types of emotional geographies (sociocultural, moral, professional, physical, and political) are experienced by Graduate Preservice Student Teachers (GPSTs) during their teaching practicum? How do these emotional experiences influence GPSTs' teaching beliefs, teaching styles, and professional development during their practicum? 2. Stronger Motivation of Research Questions from the Introduction We have refined the concluding paragraphs of the Introduction to more clearly highlight the research gap and to lead logically into the formulation of the research questions. Revision Inserted at the End of Introduction: Although prior studies have examined teachers’ emotional experiences with parents (Chen & Wang, 2011; Sanhadi Rahayu & Asanti, 2021), students (Hargreaves, 2000), colleagues (Hargreaves, 2001a), and principals (Lassila et al., 2017), little attention has been given to preservice teachers’ emotional geography during practicums. Thus, the current study addresses this gap. 3. Clarification of Data Collection and Analysis in Relation to the Research Questions To enhance clarity, we have explicitly detailed in the Methods section how the data collection and analysis procedures were designed to address the research questions. Revision Inserted into Instruments Subsection: This study used semi-structured interviews based on Hargreaves' five emotional geography dimensions. The interview structure was designed specifically to explore the emotional geographies (RQ1) and their impact on teaching beliefs and styles (RQ2). Revision Inserted into Research Procedure Subsection: These interviews were designed to gather in-depth qualitative data needed to answer the stated research questions regarding types of emotional geographies experienced and their influence on teaching beliefs and practices. Revision Inserted into Data Analysis Technique Subsection: A phenomenological approach was adopted because it best supports exploring participants' lived experiences related to emotional geographies, directly aligning with the research questions. The data analysis systematically addressed the types of emotional geographies encountered (RQ1) and their influence on GPSTs’ professional development (RQ2). We hope that these revisions have sufficiently addressed the reviewer’s concerns and improved the overall clarity and rigor of the manuscript. All changes have been clearly marked in the revised manuscript for ease of review. Competing Interests: There is no competing interests. Close Report a concern COMMENT ON THIS REPORT Views 0 Cite How to cite this report: Paiva MO. Reviewer Report For: A phenomenological analysis of the emotional experiences of graduate preservice student teachers in Indonesia [version 3; peer review: 2 approved] . F1000Research 2025, 12 :505 ( https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.178867.r377400 ) The direct URL for this report is: https://f1000research.com/articles/12-505/v2#referee-response-377400 NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in this citation. Close Copy Citation Details Reviewer Report 15 Apr 2025 Maria Olímpia Paiva , University of Minho, Braga,, Portugal Approved VIEWS 0 https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.178867.r377400 I would like to commend the authors for the revisions made to the article. The updated version provides greater clarity regarding the study’s objectives and methodology. The theoretical foundations that were previously ambiguous have been sufficiently clarified. These changes enhance ... Continue reading READ ALL I would like to commend the authors for the revisions made to the article. The updated version provides greater clarity regarding the study’s objectives and methodology. The theoretical foundations that were previously ambiguous have been sufficiently clarified. These changes enhance the rigour and readability of the work. I believe the authors have adequately addressed the concerns raised in the initial review. I have no further comments at this time. Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed. Reviewer Expertise: . I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard. Close READ LESS CITE CITE HOW TO CITE THIS REPORT Paiva MO. Reviewer Report For: A phenomenological analysis of the emotional experiences of graduate preservice student teachers in Indonesia [version 3; peer review: 2 approved] . F1000Research 2025, 12 :505 ( https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.178867.r377400 ) The direct URL for this report is: https://f1000research.com/articles/12-505/v2#referee-response-377400 NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article. COPY CITATION DETAILS Report a concern Respond or Comment COMMENT ON THIS REPORT Version 1 VERSION 1 PUBLISHED 16 May 2023 Views 0 Cite How to cite this report: Paiva MO. Reviewer Report For: A phenomenological analysis of the emotional experiences of graduate preservice student teachers in Indonesia [version 3; peer review: 2 approved] . F1000Research 2025, 12 :505 ( https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.145015.r299520 ) The direct URL for this report is: https://f1000research.com/articles/12-505/v1#referee-response-299520 NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in this citation. Close Copy Citation Details Reviewer Report 17 Jul 2024 Maria Olímpia Paiva , University of Minho, Braga,, Portugal Approved with Reservations VIEWS 0 https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.145015.r299520 Dear authors, Here are some suggestions to make the article clearer, more objective, and of excellence: Abstract The objectives of the study should be more explicitly stated in the summary, as they are currently diluted ... Continue reading READ ALL Dear authors, Here are some suggestions to make the article clearer, more objective, and of excellence: Abstract The objectives of the study should be more explicitly stated in the summary, as they are currently diluted between the "Context" and "Method" sections, and there should be a specific heading – "Objectives". Introduction - Rewrite the underlined text to avoid repeating "Hargreaves, 2001b" too often: “Emotional geographies describe the patterns of closeness and distance in human interactions that shape the emotions we experience about relationships to ourselves, each other, and the world around us (Hargreaves, 2001b). Hargreaves (2001b) claimed that understanding teachers ’ emotions is crucial because it can influence the classroom environment and the conduct of the learning activities. Hargreaves ’ (2001b) emotional geography framework can also be used to map a teacher ’ s series of feelings. Hargreaves (2001b) defined five emotional geographies (i.e., sociocultural, moral, professional, physical, and political) as geographical and experiential patterns of closeness/distance in human connections that form, configure, and color feelings about ourselves, the world, and one another.” - As the article is based on Hargreaves' (2001) theoretical model of emotional geographies, it is essential that this model is further developed, along with its dimensions (socio-cultural, moral, professional, physical, and political). The author considers that teaching and learning are undoubtedly emotional practices, and consequently, the school space becomes an emotional geography. Hargreaves argues that such constructivist approaches to learning place greater emphasis on problem-solving and the application of knowledge, broadening the focus on creativity. In this context, emotional geographies describe the patterns of closeness and distance in human interactions, shaping the emotions we experience in our relationships with ourselves, others, and the world around us. Thus, emotion and cognition, feeling and thinking, intertwine in all social practices in complex ways. “However, the investigation of emotional geography of preservice teacher during the practicum has remained unseen by many scholars. Therefore, the present researchers want to fill this gap through this study” - First and third person references should be avoided. The information mentioned above should be addressed in the study objectives. “They have to deal with various settings involving students and the sociocultural contexts in the institution in which they are teaching (Riesky, 2013). This study revealed the difficulties preservice teachers experienced due to their emotional beliefs (Riesky, 2013).” Rewrite the underlined text to avoid repeating "Riesky, 2013”. “A teacher’s experience of teaching can be affected by their relationships with the students (Hargreaves, 2000), parents (Hargreaves & Lasky, 2004), their colleagues (Hargreaves, 2001a), principals, and educational changes (Hargreaves, 1998a, 1998b), with the feelings from these relationships affecting teaching styles, judgments, and the conduct of the class learning activities.” Other authors' studies can be referenced in addition to those associated with Hargreaves. Before presenting the empirical part of the study, it is suggested to briefly outline the study objectives. Methods The methodology should be guided by the headings "Participants," "Procedures," "Instruments," and "Data Analysis," under which all relevant information pertaining to each heading should be included. Ethics This part concerning "Ethics" should be included under "Procedures." Participants Characterize the sample more comprehensively by including gender, years of service, age, and whether they work in public or private education, … Research procedure The information in Table 1 is not easy to understand. Dats analysis technique In the "Data Analysis" section, the "Instrument" used consists of the three mentioned stages (emotion coding, identification and/or interpretation of causes of reported emotions, and identification of themes based on emotional geography structure), based on Hargreaves (1998a). However, it is unclear how these three stages were adapted to the Indonesian context and what procedures were taken to validate these stages. The entire validation process and reliability of these three stages must be clarified to validate the study results effectively. Limitation and Implication Due to the known challenges in qualitative studies, it is suggested to propose additional considerations for future research to address the identified limitations, providing a more comprehensive and profound understanding of the emotional experiences of novice teachers and contributing to continuous improvement in teacher education. Examples to consider include: inclusion of various educational contexts; socio-cultural diversity; mixed data collection methodologies; longitudinal studies; enhanced communication tools; automatic recording and transcription; emotion analysis using AI tools; study of self-regulation strategies; assessment of pandemic impacts; hybrid teaching models; emotional support programs; and training in emotional self-regulation. Conclusion Considering the importance of the topic, in addition to the conclusions presented, other relevant aspects for the training of future teachers can be considered. By incorporating these aspects into the training of future teachers, it is possible to prepare them in a more holistic and effective manner to face the challenges of contemporary education, promoting quality and student-centered teaching. Some suggested examples include: Development of Socioemotional Skills; Practices of Self-reflection; Integration of Educational Technologies; Continuous Professional Development; Diversity and Inclusion; Innovative Pedagogical Strategies; Collaboration and Teamwork. Is the work clearly and accurately presented and does it cite the current literature? Yes Is the study design appropriate and is the work technically sound? Partly Are sufficient details of methods and analysis provided to allow replication by others? Partly If applicable, is the statistical analysis and its interpretation appropriate? Not applicable Are all the source data underlying the results available to ensure full reproducibility? Yes Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the results? Yes Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed. Reviewer Expertise: . I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard, however I have significant reservations, as outlined above. Close READ LESS CITE CITE HOW TO CITE THIS REPORT Paiva MO. Reviewer Report For: A phenomenological analysis of the emotional experiences of graduate preservice student teachers in Indonesia [version 3; peer review: 2 approved] . F1000Research 2025, 12 :505 ( https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.145015.r299520 ) The direct URL for this report is: https://f1000research.com/articles/12-505/v1#referee-response-299520 NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article. COPY CITATION DETAILS Report a concern Author Response 18 Jul 2024 Famala Eka Sanhadi Rahayu , English Literature of Cultural Science Faculty, Universitas Mulawarman, Samarinda, 75123, Indonesia 18 Jul 2024 Author Response Thank you very much for your suggestions. I will definitely make an improvement based on what you suggested. Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed. Thank you very much for your suggestions. I will definitely make an improvement based on what you suggested. Thank you very much for your suggestions. I will definitely make an improvement based on what you suggested. Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed. Close Report a concern Respond or Comment COMMENTS ON THIS REPORT Author Response 18 Jul 2024 Famala Eka Sanhadi Rahayu , English Literature of Cultural Science Faculty, Universitas Mulawarman, Samarinda, 75123, Indonesia 18 Jul 2024 Author Response Thank you very much for your suggestions. I will definitely make an improvement based on what you suggested. Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed. Thank you very much for your suggestions. I will definitely make an improvement based on what you suggested. Thank you very much for your suggestions. I will definitely make an improvement based on what you suggested. Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed. Close Report a concern COMMENT ON THIS REPORT Comments on this article Comments (0) Version 3 VERSION 3 PUBLISHED 16 May 2023 ADD YOUR COMMENT Comment keyboard_arrow_left keyboard_arrow_right Open Peer Review Reviewer Status info_outline Alongside their report, reviewers assign a status to the article: Approved The paper is scientifically sound in its current form and only minor, if any, improvements are suggested Approved with reservations A number of small changes, sometimes more significant revisions are required to address specific details and improve the papers academic merit. Not approved Fundamental flaws in the paper seriously undermine the findings and conclusions Reviewer Reports Invited Reviewers 1 2 Version 3 (revision) 06 May 25 read Version 2 (revision) 11 Apr 25 read read Version 1 16 May 23 read Maria Olímpia Paiva , University of Minho, Braga,, Portugal Xuesong Gao , The University of New South Wales, New South Wales, Australia Comments on this article All Comments (0) Add a comment Sign up for content alerts Sign Up You are now signed up to receive this alert Browse by related subjects keyboard_arrow_left Back to all reports Reviewer Report 0 Views copyright © 2025 Gao X. This is an open access peer review report distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. 13 May 2025 | for Version 3 Xuesong Gao , The University of New South Wales, New South Wales, Australia 0 Views copyright © 2025 Gao X. This is an open access peer review report distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. format_quote Cite this report speaker_notes Responses (0) Approved info_outline Alongside their report, reviewers assign a status to the article: Approved The paper is scientifically sound in its current form and only minor, if any, improvements are suggested Approved with reservations A number of small changes, sometimes more significant revisions are required to address specific details and improve the papers academic merit. Not approved Fundamental flaws in the paper seriously undermine the findings and conclusions I have no further issue with the study. Competing Interests No competing interests were disclosed. Reviewer Expertise language teacher education I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard. reply Respond to this report Responses (0) Gao X. Peer Review Report For: A phenomenological analysis of the emotional experiences of graduate preservice student teachers in Indonesia [version 3; peer review: 2 approved] . F1000Research 2025, 12 :505 ( https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.181229.r383098) NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in this citation. The direct URL for this report is: https://f1000research.com/articles/12-505/v3#referee-response-383098 keyboard_arrow_left Back to all reports Reviewer Report 0 Views copyright © 2025 Gao X. This is an open access peer review report distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. 24 Apr 2025 | for Version 2 Xuesong Gao , The University of New South Wales, New South Wales, Australia 0 Views copyright © 2025 Gao X. This is an open access peer review report distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. format_quote Cite this report speaker_notes Responses (1) Approved With Reservations info_outline Alongside their report, reviewers assign a status to the article: Approved The paper is scientifically sound in its current form and only minor, if any, improvements are suggested Approved with reservations A number of small changes, sometimes more significant revisions are required to address specific details and improve the papers academic merit. Not approved Fundamental flaws in the paper seriously undermine the findings and conclusions I suggest that the authors include research questions that were addressed in the study. Research question(s) should be well motivated by the literature review (and introduction) and presented separated from the rest of writing to be more visible. In the methodology section, it should be made clear how the data were collected and analyzed to answer the research question(s). Without reference to the research question(s), it is difficult for this reader to appreciate whether the study has achieved what it was supposed to achieve. Is the work clearly and accurately presented and does it cite the current literature? Yes Is the study design appropriate and is the work technically sound? Yes Are sufficient details of methods and analysis provided to allow replication by others? Partly If applicable, is the statistical analysis and its interpretation appropriate? Not applicable Are all the source data underlying the results available to ensure full reproducibility? Yes Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the results? Yes Competing Interests No competing interests were disclosed. Reviewer Expertise language teacher education I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard, however I have significant reservations, as outlined above. reply Respond to this report Responses (1) Author Response 09 May 2025 Famala Eka Sanhadi Rahayu, English Literature of Cultural Science Faculty, Universitas Mulawarman, Samarinda, 75123, Indonesia Dear Reviewer We sincerely thank the reviewer for the insightful and constructive feedback provided. In response to the comments, we have carefully revised the manuscript to enhance its clarity, structure, and alignment with the study's objectives. The revisions undertaken are as follows: 1. Addition of Explicit Research Questions (Separated and Clearly Visible) To address the reviewer's suggestion, we have inserted a new section titled “Research Questions” immediately following the Introduction and preceding the Literature Review. This section explicitly states the two research questions that guide the study. Revision Inserted: Research Questions This study is guided by the following research questions: What types of emotional geographies (sociocultural, moral, professional, physical, and political) are experienced by Graduate Preservice Student Teachers (GPSTs) during their teaching practicum? How do these emotional experiences influence GPSTs' teaching beliefs, teaching styles, and professional development during their practicum? 2. Stronger Motivation of Research Questions from the Introduction We have refined the concluding paragraphs of the Introduction to more clearly highlight the research gap and to lead logically into the formulation of the research questions. Revision Inserted at the End of Introduction: Although prior studies have examined teachers’ emotional experiences with parents (Chen & Wang, 2011; Sanhadi Rahayu & Asanti, 2021), students (Hargreaves, 2000), colleagues (Hargreaves, 2001a), and principals (Lassila et al., 2017), little attention has been given to preservice teachers’ emotional geography during practicums. Thus, the current study addresses this gap. 3. Clarification of Data Collection and Analysis in Relation to the Research Questions To enhance clarity, we have explicitly detailed in the Methods section how the data collection and analysis procedures were designed to address the research questions. Revision Inserted into Instruments Subsection: This study used semi-structured interviews based on Hargreaves' five emotional geography dimensions. The interview structure was designed specifically to explore the emotional geographies (RQ1) and their impact on teaching beliefs and styles (RQ2). Revision Inserted into Research Procedure Subsection: These interviews were designed to gather in-depth qualitative data needed to answer the stated research questions regarding types of emotional geographies experienced and their influence on teaching beliefs and practices. Revision Inserted into Data Analysis Technique Subsection: A phenomenological approach was adopted because it best supports exploring participants' lived experiences related to emotional geographies, directly aligning with the research questions. The data analysis systematically addressed the types of emotional geographies encountered (RQ1) and their influence on GPSTs’ professional development (RQ2). We hope that these revisions have sufficiently addressed the reviewer’s concerns and improved the overall clarity and rigor of the manuscript. All changes have been clearly marked in the revised manuscript for ease of review. View more View less Competing Interests There is no competing interests. reply Respond Report a concern Gao X. Peer Review Report For: A phenomenological analysis of the emotional experiences of graduate preservice student teachers in Indonesia [version 3; peer review: 2 approved] . F1000Research 2025, 12 :505 ( https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.178867.r378436) NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in this citation. The direct URL for this report is: https://f1000research.com/articles/12-505/v2#referee-response-378436 keyboard_arrow_left Back to all reports Reviewer Report 0 Views copyright © 2025 Paiva M. This is an open access peer review report distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. 15 Apr 2025 | for Version 2 Maria Olímpia Paiva , University of Minho, Braga,, Portugal 0 Views copyright © 2025 Paiva M. This is an open access peer review report distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. format_quote Cite this report speaker_notes Responses (0) Approved info_outline Alongside their report, reviewers assign a status to the article: Approved The paper is scientifically sound in its current form and only minor, if any, improvements are suggested Approved with reservations A number of small changes, sometimes more significant revisions are required to address specific details and improve the papers academic merit. Not approved Fundamental flaws in the paper seriously undermine the findings and conclusions I would like to commend the authors for the revisions made to the article. The updated version provides greater clarity regarding the study’s objectives and methodology. The theoretical foundations that were previously ambiguous have been sufficiently clarified. These changes enhance the rigour and readability of the work. I believe the authors have adequately addressed the concerns raised in the initial review. I have no further comments at this time. Competing Interests No competing interests were disclosed. Reviewer Expertise . I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard. reply Respond to this report Responses (0) Paiva MO. Peer Review Report For: A phenomenological analysis of the emotional experiences of graduate preservice student teachers in Indonesia [version 3; peer review: 2 approved] . F1000Research 2025, 12 :505 ( https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.178867.r377400) NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in this citation. The direct URL for this report is: https://f1000research.com/articles/12-505/v2#referee-response-377400 keyboard_arrow_left Back to all reports Reviewer Report 0 Views copyright © 2024 Paiva M. This is an open access peer review report distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. 17 Jul 2024 | for Version 1 Maria Olímpia Paiva , University of Minho, Braga,, Portugal 0 Views copyright © 2024 Paiva M. This is an open access peer review report distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. format_quote Cite this report speaker_notes Responses (1) Approved With Reservations info_outline Alongside their report, reviewers assign a status to the article: Approved The paper is scientifically sound in its current form and only minor, if any, improvements are suggested Approved with reservations A number of small changes, sometimes more significant revisions are required to address specific details and improve the papers academic merit. Not approved Fundamental flaws in the paper seriously undermine the findings and conclusions Dear authors, Here are some suggestions to make the article clearer, more objective, and of excellence: Abstract The objectives of the study should be more explicitly stated in the summary, as they are currently diluted between the "Context" and "Method" sections, and there should be a specific heading – "Objectives". Introduction - Rewrite the underlined text to avoid repeating "Hargreaves, 2001b" too often: “Emotional geographies describe the patterns of closeness and distance in human interactions that shape the emotions we experience about relationships to ourselves, each other, and the world around us (Hargreaves, 2001b). Hargreaves (2001b) claimed that understanding teachers ’ emotions is crucial because it can influence the classroom environment and the conduct of the learning activities. Hargreaves ’ (2001b) emotional geography framework can also be used to map a teacher ’ s series of feelings. Hargreaves (2001b) defined five emotional geographies (i.e., sociocultural, moral, professional, physical, and political) as geographical and experiential patterns of closeness/distance in human connections that form, configure, and color feelings about ourselves, the world, and one another.” - As the article is based on Hargreaves' (2001) theoretical model of emotional geographies, it is essential that this model is further developed, along with its dimensions (socio-cultural, moral, professional, physical, and political). The author considers that teaching and learning are undoubtedly emotional practices, and consequently, the school space becomes an emotional geography. Hargreaves argues that such constructivist approaches to learning place greater emphasis on problem-solving and the application of knowledge, broadening the focus on creativity. In this context, emotional geographies describe the patterns of closeness and distance in human interactions, shaping the emotions we experience in our relationships with ourselves, others, and the world around us. Thus, emotion and cognition, feeling and thinking, intertwine in all social practices in complex ways. “However, the investigation of emotional geography of preservice teacher during the practicum has remained unseen by many scholars. Therefore, the present researchers want to fill this gap through this study” - First and third person references should be avoided. The information mentioned above should be addressed in the study objectives. “They have to deal with various settings involving students and the sociocultural contexts in the institution in which they are teaching (Riesky, 2013). This study revealed the difficulties preservice teachers experienced due to their emotional beliefs (Riesky, 2013).” Rewrite the underlined text to avoid repeating "Riesky, 2013”. “A teacher’s experience of teaching can be affected by their relationships with the students (Hargreaves, 2000), parents (Hargreaves & Lasky, 2004), their colleagues (Hargreaves, 2001a), principals, and educational changes (Hargreaves, 1998a, 1998b), with the feelings from these relationships affecting teaching styles, judgments, and the conduct of the class learning activities.” Other authors' studies can be referenced in addition to those associated with Hargreaves. Before presenting the empirical part of the study, it is suggested to briefly outline the study objectives. Methods The methodology should be guided by the headings "Participants," "Procedures," "Instruments," and "Data Analysis," under which all relevant information pertaining to each heading should be included. Ethics This part concerning "Ethics" should be included under "Procedures." Participants Characterize the sample more comprehensively by including gender, years of service, age, and whether they work in public or private education, … Research procedure The information in Table 1 is not easy to understand. Dats analysis technique In the "Data Analysis" section, the "Instrument" used consists of the three mentioned stages (emotion coding, identification and/or interpretation of causes of reported emotions, and identification of themes based on emotional geography structure), based on Hargreaves (1998a). However, it is unclear how these three stages were adapted to the Indonesian context and what procedures were taken to validate these stages. The entire validation process and reliability of these three stages must be clarified to validate the study results effectively. Limitation and Implication Due to the known challenges in qualitative studies, it is suggested to propose additional considerations for future research to address the identified limitations, providing a more comprehensive and profound understanding of the emotional experiences of novice teachers and contributing to continuous improvement in teacher education. Examples to consider include: inclusion of various educational contexts; socio-cultural diversity; mixed data collection methodologies; longitudinal studies; enhanced communication tools; automatic recording and transcription; emotion analysis using AI tools; study of self-regulation strategies; assessment of pandemic impacts; hybrid teaching models; emotional support programs; and training in emotional self-regulation. Conclusion Considering the importance of the topic, in addition to the conclusions presented, other relevant aspects for the training of future teachers can be considered. By incorporating these aspects into the training of future teachers, it is possible to prepare them in a more holistic and effective manner to face the challenges of contemporary education, promoting quality and student-centered teaching. Some suggested examples include: Development of Socioemotional Skills; Practices of Self-reflection; Integration of Educational Technologies; Continuous Professional Development; Diversity and Inclusion; Innovative Pedagogical Strategies; Collaboration and Teamwork. Is the work clearly and accurately presented and does it cite the current literature? Yes Is the study design appropriate and is the work technically sound? Partly Are sufficient details of methods and analysis provided to allow replication by others? Partly If applicable, is the statistical analysis and its interpretation appropriate? Not applicable Are all the source data underlying the results available to ensure full reproducibility? Yes Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the results? Yes Competing Interests No competing interests were disclosed. Reviewer Expertise . I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard, however I have significant reservations, as outlined above. reply Respond to this report Responses (1) Author Response 18 Jul 2024 Famala Eka Sanhadi Rahayu, English Literature of Cultural Science Faculty, Universitas Mulawarman, Samarinda, 75123, Indonesia Thank you very much for your suggestions. I will definitely make an improvement based on what you suggested. View more View less Competing Interests No competing interests were disclosed. reply Respond Report a concern Paiva MO. Peer Review Report For: A phenomenological analysis of the emotional experiences of graduate preservice student teachers in Indonesia [version 3; peer review: 2 approved] . F1000Research 2025, 12 :505 ( https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.145015.r299520) NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in this citation. The direct URL for this report is: https://f1000research.com/articles/12-505/v1#referee-response-299520 Alongside their report, reviewers assign a status to the article: Approved - the paper is scientifically sound in its current form and only minor, if any, improvements are suggested Approved with reservations - A number of small changes, sometimes more significant revisions are required to address specific details and improve the papers academic merit. Not approved - fundamental flaws in the paper seriously undermine the findings and conclusions Adjust parameters to alter display View on desktop for interactive features Includes Interactive Elements View on desktop for interactive features Competing Interests Policy Provide sufficient details of any financial or non-financial competing interests to enable users to assess whether your comments might lead a reasonable person to question your impartiality. Consider the following examples, but note that this is not an exhaustive list: Examples of 'Non-Financial Competing Interests' Within the past 4 years, you have held joint grants, published or collaborated with any of the authors of the selected paper. You have a close personal relationship (e.g. parent, spouse, sibling, or domestic partner) with any of the authors. You are a close professional associate of any of the authors (e.g. scientific mentor, recent student). You work at the same institute as any of the authors. You hope/expect to benefit (e.g. favour or employment) as a result of your submission. You are an Editor for the journal in which the article is published. Examples of 'Financial Competing Interests' You expect to receive, or in the past 4 years have received, any of the following from any commercial organisation that may gain financially from your submission: a salary, fees, funding, reimbursements. You expect to receive, or in the past 4 years have received, shared grant support or other funding with any of the authors. You hold, or are currently applying for, any patents or significant stocks/shares relating to the subject matter of the paper you are commenting on. Stay Updated Sign up for content alerts and receive a weekly or monthly email with all newly published articles Register with F1000Research Already registered? Sign in Not now, thanks close PLEASE NOTE If you are an AUTHOR of this article, please check that you signed in with the account associated with this article otherwise we cannot automatically identify your role as an author and your comment will be labelled as a “User Comment”. If you are a REVIEWER of this article, please check that you have signed in with the account associated with this article and then go to your account to submit your report, please do not post your review here. If you do not have access to your original account, please contact us . All commenters must hold a formal affiliation as per our Policies . The information that you give us will be displayed next to your comment. User comments must be in English, comprehensible and relevant to the article under discussion. We reserve the right to remove any comments that we consider to be inappropriate, offensive or otherwise in breach of the User Comment Terms and Conditions . Commenters must not use a comment for personal attacks. When criticisms of the article are based on unpublished data, the data should be made available. I accept the User Comment Terms and Conditions Please confirm that you accept the User Comment Terms and Conditions. Affiliation ✕ refresh Please enter your institution. Note: To add your institution or organisation, start typing the name and then select the correct name from the list. Where applicable, the name will appear in both the original language and in English. Do not paste in the name. If the name does not appear in the drop-down list, we will display the information you have entered. ✕ refresh Country/Region * USA UK Canada China France Germany Afghanistan Aland Islands Albania Algeria American Samoa Andorra Angola Anguilla Antarctica Antigua and Barbuda Argentina Armenia Aruba Australia Austria Azerbaijan Bahamas Bahrain Bangladesh Barbados Belarus Belgium Belize Benin Bermuda Bhutan Bolivia Bosnia and Herzegovina Botswana Bouvet Island Brazil British Indian Ocean Territory British Virgin Islands Brunei Bulgaria Burkina Faso Burundi Cambodia Cameroon Canada Cape Verde Cayman Islands Central African Republic Chad Chile China Christmas Island Cocos (Keeling) Islands Colombia Comoros Congo Cook Islands Costa Rica Cote d'Ivoire Croatia Cuba Cyprus Czech Republic Democratic Republic of the Congo Denmark Djibouti Dominica Dominican Republic Ecuador Egypt El Salvador Equatorial Guinea Eritrea Estonia Ethiopia Falkland Islands Faroe Islands Federated States of Micronesia Fiji Finland France French Guiana French Polynesia French Southern Territories Gabon Georgia Germany Ghana Gibraltar Greece Greenland Grenada Guadeloupe Guam Guatemala Guernsey Guinea Guinea-Bissau Guyana Haiti Heard Island and Mcdonald Islands Holy See (Vatican City State) Honduras Hong Kong Hungary Iceland India Indonesia Iran Iraq Ireland Israel Italy Jamaica Japan Jersey Jordan Kazakhstan Kenya Kiribati Kosovo (Serbia and Montenegro) Kuwait Kyrgyzstan Lao People's Democratic Republic Latvia Lebanon Lesotho Liberia Libya Liechtenstein Lithuania Luxembourg Macao Madagascar Malawi Malaysia Maldives Mali Malta Marshall Islands Martinique Mauritania Mauritius Mayotte Mexico Minor Outlying Islands of the United States Moldova Monaco Mongolia Montenegro Montserrat Morocco Mozambique Myanmar Namibia Nauru Nepal Netherlands Antilles New Caledonia New Zealand Nicaragua Niger Nigeria Niue Norfolk Island North Korea North Macedonia Northern Mariana Islands Norway Oman Pakistan Palau Palestinian Territory Panama Papua New Guinea Paraguay Peru Philippines Pitcairn Poland Portugal Puerto Rico Qatar Reunion Romania Russian Federation Rwanda Saint Helena Saint Kitts and Nevis Saint Lucia Saint Pierre and Miquelon Saint Vincent and the Grenadines Samoa San Marino Sao Tome and Principe Saudi Arabia Senegal Serbia Seychelles Sierra Leone Singapore Slovakia Slovenia Solomon Islands Somalia South Africa South Georgia and the South Sandwich Is South Korea South Sudan Spain Sri Lanka Sudan Suriname Svalbard and Jan Mayen Swaziland Sweden Switzerland Syria Taiwan Tajikistan Tanzania Thailand The Gambia The Netherlands Timor-Leste Togo Tokelau Tonga Trinidad and Tobago Tunisia Turkey Turkmenistan Turks and Caicos Islands Tuvalu UK USA Uganda Ukraine United Arab Emirates United States Virgin Islands Uruguay Uzbekistan Vanuatu Venezuela Vietnam Wallis and Futuna West Bank and Gaza Strip Western Sahara Yemen Zambia Zimbabwe Please select your country/region. You must enter a comment. Competing Interests Please disclose any competing interests that might be construed to influence your judgment of the article's or peer review report's validity or importance. Competing Interests Policy Provide sufficient details of any financial or non-financial competing interests to enable users to assess whether your comments might lead a reasonable person to question your impartiality. Consider the following examples, but note that this is not an exhaustive list: Examples of 'Non-Financial Competing Interests' Within the past 4 years, you have held joint grants, published or collaborated with any of the authors of the selected paper. You have a close personal relationship (e.g. parent, spouse, sibling, or domestic partner) with any of the authors. You are a close professional associate of any of the authors (e.g. scientific mentor, recent student). You work at the same institute as any of the authors. You hope/expect to benefit (e.g. favour or employment) as a result of your submission. You are an Editor for the journal in which the article is published. Examples of 'Financial Competing Interests' You expect to receive, or in the past 4 years have received, any of the following from any commercial organisation that may gain financially from your submission: a salary, fees, funding, reimbursements. You expect to receive, or in the past 4 years have received, shared grant support or other funding with any of the authors. You hold, or are currently applying for, any patents or significant stocks/shares relating to the subject matter of the paper you are commenting on. Please state your competing interests The comment has been saved. An error has occurred. Please try again. Cancel Post var lTitle = "A phenomenological analysis of the emotional...".replace("'", ''); var linkedInUrl = "http://www.linkedin.com/shareArticle?url=https://f1000research.com/articles/12-505/v3" + "&title=" + encodeURIComponent(lTitle) + "&summary=" + encodeURIComponent('Read the article by '); var deliciousUrl = "https://del.icio.us/post?url=https://f1000research.com/articles/12-505/v3&title=" + encodeURIComponent(lTitle); var redditUrl = "http://reddit.com/submit?url=https://f1000research.com/articles/12-505/v3" + "&title=" + encodeURIComponent(lTitle); linkedInUrl += encodeURIComponent('Sunardi S et al.'); var offsetTop = /chrome/i.test( navigator.userAgent ) ? 4 : -10; var addthis_config = { ui_offset_top: offsetTop, services_compact : "facebook,twitter,www.linkedin.com,www.mendeley.com,reddit.com", services_expanded : "facebook,twitter,www.linkedin.com,www.mendeley.com,reddit.com", services_custom : [ { name: "LinkedIn", url: linkedInUrl, icon:"/img/icon/at_linkedin.svg" }, { name: "Mendeley", url: "http://www.mendeley.com/import/?url=https://f1000research.com/articles/12-505/v3/mendeley", icon:"/img/icon/at_mendeley.svg" }, { name: "Reddit", url: redditUrl, icon:"/img/icon/at_reddit.svg" }, ] }; var addthis_share = { url: "https://f1000research.com/articles/12-505", templates : { twitter : "A phenomenological analysis of the emotional experiences of graduate.... Sunardi S et al., published by " + "@F1000Research" + ", https://f1000research.com/articles/12-505/v3" } }; if (typeof(addthis) != "undefined"){ addthis.addEventListener('addthis.ready', checkCount); addthis.addEventListener('addthis.menu.share', checkCount); } $(".f1r-shares-twitter").attr("href", "https://twitter.com/intent/tweet?text=" + addthis_share.templates.twitter); $(".f1r-shares-facebook").attr("href", "https://www.facebook.com/sharer/sharer.php?u=" + addthis_share.url); $(".f1r-shares-linkedin").attr("href", addthis_config.services_custom[0].url); $(".f1r-shares-reddit").attr("href", addthis_config.services_custom[2].url); $(".f1r-shares-mendelay").attr("href", addthis_config.services_custom[1].url); function checkCount(){ setTimeout(function(){ $(".addthis_button_expanded").each(function(){ var count = $(this).text(); if (count !== "" && count != "0") $(this).removeClass("is-hidden"); else $(this).addClass("is-hidden"); }); }, 1000); } close How to cite this report {{reportCitation}} Cancel Copy Citation Details $(function(){R.ui.buttonDropdowns('.dropdown-for-downloads');}); $(function(){R.ui.toolbarDropdowns('.toolbar-dropdown-for-downloads');}); $.get("/articles/acj/132112/181229") new F1000.Clipboard(); new F1000.ThesaurusTermsDisplay("articles", "article", "181229"); $(document).ready(function() { $( "#frame1" ).on('load', function() { var mydiv = $(this).contents().find("div"); var h = mydiv.height(); console.log(h) }); var tooltipLivingFigure = jQuery(".interactive-living-figure-label .icon-more-info"), titleLivingFigure = tooltipLivingFigure.attr("title"); tooltipLivingFigure.simpletip({ fixed: true, position: ["-115", "30"], baseClass: 'small-tooltip', content:titleLivingFigure + " " }); tooltipLivingFigure.removeAttr("title"); $("body").on("click", ".cite-living-figure", function(e) { e.preventDefault(); var ref = $(this).attr("data-ref"); $(this).closest(".living-figure-list-container").find("#" + ref).fadeIn(200); }); $("body").on("click", ".close-cite-living-figure", function(e) { e.preventDefault(); $(this).closest(".popup-window-wrapper").fadeOut(200); }); $(document).on("mouseup", function(e) { var metricsContainer = $(".article-metrics-popover-wrapper"); if (!metricsContainer.is(e.target) && metricsContainer.has(e.target).length === 0) { $(".article-metrics-close-button").click(); } }); var articleId = $('#articleId').val(); if($("#main-article-count-box").attachArticleMetrics) { $("#main-article-count-box").attachArticleMetrics(articleId, { articleMetricsView: true }); } }); var figshareWidget = $(".new_figshare_widget"); if (figshareWidget.length > 0) { window.figshare.load("f1000", function(Widget) { // Select a tag/tags defined in your page. In this tag we will place the widget. _.map(figshareWidget, function(el){ var widget = new Widget({ articleId: $(el).attr("figshare_articleId") //height:300 // this is the height of the viewer part. [Default: 550] }); widget.initialize(); // initialize the widget widget.mount(el); // mount it in a tag that's on your page // this will save the widget on the global scope for later use from // your JS scripts. This line is optional. //window.widget = widget; }); }); } close Error Close Add Reset F1000.MICROSERVICES.AFFILIATION = ''; $(document).ready(function () { $('.js-affiliations-form').each((index, form) => { new AffiliationForm({ formId: form.id, institutionErrorSelector: '.comment-enter-institution', departmentErrorSelector: '.comment-enter-department', placeSelector: '.js-add-comment-place', stateSelector: '.js-add-comment-state', zipCodeSelector: '.js-add-comment-zipcode', countrySelector: '.js-add-comment-country', countryErrorSelector: '.comment-enter-country', }); }); }); $(document).ready(function () { var reportIds = { "185858": 0, "185859": 0, "185857": 0, "185862": 0, "299520": 27, "299521": 0, "185860": 0, "185861": 0, "183331": 0, "183334": 0, "183335": 0, "183332": 0, "226853": 0, "183333": 0, "226857": 0, "226860": 0, "378421": 0, "378420": 0, "226865": 0, "378417": 0, "378419": 0, "226869": 0, "378418": 0, "226873": 0, "216639": 0, "377400": 10, "226877": 0, "226883": 0, "216643": 0, "378436": 12, "216642": 0, "216641": 0, "216640": 0, "378433": 0, "378432": 0, "226886": 0, "378435": 0, "216645": 0, "378434": 0, "216644": 0, "226888": 0, "368200": 0, "239701": 0, "239707": 0, "239706": 0, "239705": 0, "239704": 0, "239711": 0, "239710": 0, "239709": 0, "239708": 0, "239712": 0, "319073": 0, "319074": 0, "319075": 0, "203375": 0, "203379": 0, "203378": 0, "203377": 0, "203376": 0, "203382": 0, "203381": 0, "203380": 0, "383099": 0, "383098": 6, "219836": 0, "229587": 0, "306901": 0, "306902": 0, "229585": 0, "381655": 0, "306903": 0, "381654": 0, "229591": 0, "229590": 0, "229589": 0, "229588": 0, "229595": 0, "381661": 0, "229594": 0, "381660": 0, "229593": 0, "229592": 0, "306904": 0, "381657": 0, "381656": 0, "381659": 0, "381658": 0, "236303": 0, "236302": 0, "236307": 0, "236306": 0, "236305": 0, "236304": 0, "185110": 0, "236311": 0, "185111": 0, "236310": 0, "236309": 0, "185109": 0, "236308": 0, "185114": 0, "185115": 0, "185112": 0, "185113": 0, "185116": 0, "254755": 0, "218401": 0, "254753": 0, "254752": 0, "254758": 0, "280900": 0, "280901": 0, "280902": 0, "280903": 0, "280896": 0, "280898": 0, "280904": 0, "280905": 0, "280906": 0, "233851": 0, "233850": 0, "233849": 0, "233848": 0, "233855": 0, "233853": 0, "233852": 0, "233859": 0, "233857": 0, "233860": 0, "245135": 0, "245134": 0, "245132": 0, "245139": 0, "245137": 0, "245136": 0, "245143": 0, "245141": 0, "245140": 0, "245146": 0, "276894": 0, "276895": 0, "276889": 0, "276896": 0, "180138": 0, "180139": 0, "180142": 0, "180143": 0, "180140": 0, "180141": 0, "180144": 0, "287670": 0, "287671": 0, "287678": 0, "287679": 0, "287672": 0, "287674": 0, "287680": 0, "287681": 0, "287682": 0, "287683": 0, "174030": 0, "174031": 0, "174028": 0, "174029": 0, "380885": 0, "380887": 0, "380886": 0, "380893": 0, "380892": 0, "380894": 0, "380889": 0, "380888": 0, "380891": 0, "380890": 0, "201191": 0, "201190": 0, "201189": 0, "201188": 0, "201195": 0, "383469": 0, "201194": 0, "383468": 0, "201193": 0, "383471": 0, "201192": 0, "383470": 0, "383465": 0, "383464": 0, "201197": 0, "383467": 0, "201196": 0, "383466": 0, "383473": 0, "383472": 0, "369149": 0, }; $(".referee-response-container,.js-referee-report").each(function(index, el) { var reportId = $(el).attr("data-reportid"), reportCount = reportIds[reportId] || 0; $(el).find(".comments-count-container,.js-referee-report-views").html(reportCount); }); var uuidInput = $("#article_uuid"), oldUUId = uuidInput.val(), newUUId = "f0eb344a-ceaa-4f86-b180-152c3a522f02"; uuidInput.val(newUUId); $("a[href*='article_uuid=']").each(function(index, el) { var newHref = $(el).attr("href").replace(oldUUId, newUUId); $(el).attr("href", newHref); }); }); An innovative open access publishing platform offering rapid publication and open peer review, whilst supporting data deposition and sharing. Browse Gateways Collections How it Works Contact For Developers Cookie Notice Privacy Notice RSS Submit Your Research Follow us © 2012-2026 F1000 Research Ltd. ISSN 2046-1402 | Legal | Partner of Research4Life • CrossRef • ORCID • FAIRSharing R.templateTests.simpleTemplate = R.template(' $text $text $text $text $text '); R.templateTests.runTests(); var F1000platform = new F1000.Platform({ name: "f1000research", displayName: "F1000Research", hostName: "f1000research.com", id: "1", editorialEmail: "[email protected]", infoEmail: "[email protected]", usePmcStats: true }); $(function(){R.ui.dropdowns('.dropdown-for-authors, .dropdown-for-about, .dropdown-for-myresearch');}); // $(function(){R.ui.dropdowns('.dropdown-for-referees');}); $(document).ready(function () { if ($(".cookie-warning").is(":visible")) { $(".sticky").css("margin-bottom", "35px"); $(".devices").addClass("devices-and-cookie-warning"); } $(".cookie-warning .close-button").click(function (e) { $(".devices").removeClass("devices-and-cookie-warning"); $(".sticky").css("margin-bottom", "0"); }); $("#tweeter-feed .tweet-message").each(function (i, message) { var self = $(message); self.html(linkify(self.html())); }); $(".partner").on("mouseenter mouseleave", function() { $(this).find(".gray-scale, .colour").toggleClass("is-hidden"); }); }); Sign In Remember me Forgotten your password? Sign In Cancel Email or password not correct. Please try again Please wait... $(function(){ // Note: All the setup needs to run against a name attribute and *not* the id due the clonish // nature of facebox... $("a[id=googleSignInButton]").click(function(event){ event.preventDefault(); $("input[id=oAuthSystem]").val("GOOGLE"); $("form[id=oAuthForm]").submit(); }); $("a[id=facebookSignInButton]").click(function(event){ event.preventDefault(); $("input[id=oAuthSystem]").val("FACEBOOK"); $("form[id=oAuthForm]").submit(); }); $("a[id=orcidSignInButton]").click(function(event){ event.preventDefault(); $("input[id=oAuthSystem]").val("ORCID"); $("form[id=oAuthForm]").submit(); }); }); If you've forgotten your password, please enter your email address below and we'll send you instructions on how to reset your password. The email address should be the one you originally registered with F1000. Email address not valid, please try again You registered with F1000 via Google, so we cannot reset your password. To sign in, please click here . If you still need help with your Google account password, please click here . You registered with F1000 via Facebook, so we cannot reset your password. To sign in, please click here . If you still need help with your Facebook account password, please click here . Code not correct, please try again Reset password Cancel Email us for further assistance. Server error, please try again. If your email address is registered with us, we will email you instructions to reset your password. If you think you should have received this email but it has not arrived, please check your spam filters and/or contact for further assistance. Please wait... Register $(document).ready(function () { signIn.createSignInAsRow($("#sign-in-form-gfb-popup")); $(".target-field").each(function () { var uris = $(this).val().split("/"); if (uris.pop() === "login") { $(this).val(uris.toString().replace(",","/")); } }); });