Towards Scalable Biomarker Discovery in Posttraumatic Stress Disorder: Triangulating Genomic and Phenotypic Evidence from a Health System Biobank

preprint OA: closed CC-BY-NC-ND-4.0
📄 Open PDF Full text JSON View at publisher

Abstract

Importance Biomarkers can potentially improve the diagnosis, monitoring, and treatment of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). However, PTSD biomarkers that are scalable and easily integrated into real-world clinical settings have not been identified. Objective To triangulate phenotypic and genomic evidence from a health system biobank with a goal of identifying scalable and clinically relevant biomarkers for PTSD. Design, setting, and participants The analysis was conducted between June to November 2024 using genomic samples and laboratory test results recorded in the Mass General Brigham (MGB) Health System. The analysis included 23,743 European ancestry participants from the nested MGB Biobank study. Exposures The first exposure was polygenic risk score (PRS) for PTSD, calculated using the largest available European ancestry genome-wide association study (GWAS), employing a Bayesian polygenic scoring method. The second exposure was a clinical diagnosis of PTSD, determined by the presence of two or more qualifying PTSD phecodes in the longitudinal electronic health records (EHR). Main outcomes and measures The primary outcomes were the inverse normal quantile transformed, median lab values of 241 laboratory traits with non-zero h 2 SNP estimates. Results Sixteen unique laboratory traits across the cardiometabolic, hematologic, hepatic, and immune systems were implicated in both genomic and phenotypic lab-wide association scans (LabWAS). Two-sample Mendelian randomization analyses provided evidence of potential unidirectional causal effects of PTSD liability on five laboratory traits. Conclusion and relevance These findings demonstrate the potential of a triangulation approach to uncover scalable and clinically relevant biomarkers for PTSD. Key points Question Is genetic liability or diagnosis of PTSD associated with clinical laboratory measures? Findings Among European ancestry participants in the MGB Biobank, we identified 16 unique laboratory traits in cardiometabolic, hematologic, hepatic, and immune systems that were both genetically and phenotypically associated with PTSD, with five markers demonstrating potential unidirectional causal effects of PTSD liability. Meaning Our findings reveal associations between PTSD and laboratory markers across multiple physiological systems, with evidence suggesting possible unidirectional causal effects of PTSD liability on cardiometabolic, hematologic, and hepatic markers.
Full text 56,989 characters · extracted from preprint-html · click to expand
Towards Scalable Biomarker Discovery in Posttraumatic Stress Disorder: Triangulating Genomic and Phenotypic Evidence from a Health System Biobank | medRxiv /* */ /* */ <!-- <!-- /*! * yepnope1.5.4 * (c) WTFPL, GPLv2 */ (function(a,b,c){function d(a){return"[object Function]"==o.call(a)}function e(a){return"string"==typeof a}function f(){}function g(a){return!a||"loaded"==a||"complete"==a||"uninitialized"==a}function h(){var a=p.shift();q=1,a?a.t?m(function(){("c"==a.t?B.injectCss:B.injectJs)(a.s,0,a.a,a.x,a.e,1)},0):(a(),h()):q=0}function i(a,c,d,e,f,i,j){function k(b){if(!o&&g(l.readyState)&&(u.r=o=1,!q&&h(),l.onload=l.onreadystatechange=null,b)){"img"!=a&&m(function(){t.removeChild(l)},50);for(var d in y[c])y[c].hasOwnProperty(d)&&y[c][d].onload()}}var j=j||B.errorTimeout,l=b.createElement(a),o=0,r=0,u={t:d,s:c,e:f,a:i,x:j};1===y[c]&&(r=1,y[c]=[]),"object"==a?l.data=c:(l.src=c,l.type=a),l.width=l.height="0",l.onerror=l.onload=l.onreadystatechange=function(){k.call(this,r)},p.splice(e,0,u),"img"!=a&&(r||2===y[c]?(t.insertBefore(l,s?null:n),m(k,j)):y[c].push(l))}function j(a,b,c,d,f){return q=0,b=b||"j",e(a)?i("c"==b?v:u,a,b,this.i++,c,d,f):(p.splice(this.i++,0,a),1==p.length&&h()),this}function k(){var a=B;return a.loader={load:j,i:0},a}var l=b.documentElement,m=a.setTimeout,n=b.getElementsByTagName("script")[0],o={}.toString,p=[],q=0,r="MozAppearance"in l.style,s=r&&!!b.createRange().compareNode,t=s?l:n.parentNode,l=a.opera&&"[object Opera]"==o.call(a.opera),l=!!b.attachEvent&&!l,u=r?"object":l?"script":"img",v=l?"script":u,w=Array.isArray||function(a){return"[object Array]"==o.call(a)},x=[],y={},z={timeout:function(a,b){return b.length&&(a.timeout=b[0]),a}},A,B;B=function(a){function b(a){var a=a.split("!"),b=x.length,c=a.pop(),d=a.length,c={url:c,origUrl:c,prefixes:a},e,f,g;for(f=0;f<d;f++)g=a[f].split("="),(e=z[g.shift()])&&(c=e(c,g));for(f=0;f<b;f++)c=x[f](c);return c}function g(a,e,f,g,h){var i=b(a),j=i.autoCallback;i.url.split(".").pop().split("?").shift(),i.bypass||(e&&(e=d(e)?e:e[a]||e[g]||e[a.split("/").pop().split("?")[0]]),i.instead?i.instead(a,e,f,g,h):(y[i.url]?i.noexec=!0:y[i.url]=1,f.load(i.url,i.forceCSS||!i.forceJS&&"css"==i.url.split(".").pop().split("?").shift()?"c":c,i.noexec,i.attrs,i.timeout),(d(e)||d(j))&&f.load(function(){k(),e&&e(i.origUrl,h,g),j&&j(i.origUrl,h,g),y[i.url]=2})))}function h(a,b){function c(a,c){if(a){if(e(a))c||(j=function(){var a=[].slice.call(arguments);k.apply(this,a),l()}),g(a,j,b,0,h);else if(Object(a)===a)for(n in m=function(){var b=0,c;for(c in a)a.hasOwnProperty(c)&&b++;return b}(),a)a.hasOwnProperty(n)&&(!c&&!--m&&(d(j)?j=function(){var a=[].slice.call(arguments);k.apply(this,a),l()}:j[n]=function(a){return function(){var b=[].slice.call(arguments);a&&a.apply(this,b),l()}}(k[n])),g(a[n],j,b,n,h))}else!c&&l()}var h=!!a.test,i=a.load||a.both,j=a.callback||f,k=j,l=a.complete||f,m,n;c(h?a.yep:a.nope,!!i),i&&c(i)}var i,j,l=this.yepnope.loader;if(e(a))g(a,0,l,0);else if(w(a))for(i=0;i (function(w,d,s,l,i){w[l]=w[l]||[];w[l].push({'gtm.start':new Date().getTime(),event:'gtm.js'});var f=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0];var j=d.createElement(s);var dl=l!='dataLayer'?'&l='+l:'';j.src='//www.googletagmanager.com/gtm.js?id='+i+dl;j.type='text/javascript';j.async=true;f.parentNode.insertBefore(j,f);})(window,document,'script','dataLayer','GTM-P4HH5NV'); Skip to main content Home About Submit ALERTS / RSS Search for this keyword Advanced Search Towards Scalable Biomarker Discovery in Posttraumatic Stress Disorder: Triangulating Genomic and Phenotypic Evidence from a Health System Biobank View ORCID Profile Younga Heather Lee , View ORCID Profile Yingzhe Zhang , View ORCID Profile Ana Lucia Espinosa Dice , View ORCID Profile Josephine H. Li , View ORCID Profile Justin D. Tubbs , View ORCID Profile Yen-Chen Anne Feng , View ORCID Profile Tian Ge , View ORCID Profile Adam X. Maihofer , View ORCID Profile Caroline M. Nievergelt , View ORCID Profile Jordan W. Smoller , View ORCID Profile Karestan C. Koenen , View ORCID Profile Andrea L. Roberts , View ORCID Profile Natalie Slopen doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.02.27.25322886 Younga Heather Lee 1 Center for Genomic Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital , Boston, MA 2 Department of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School , Boston, MA 3 Broad Trauma Initiative, Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard , Cambridge, MA 4 Department of Epidemiology, Havard T. H. Chan School of Public Health , Boston, MA PhD Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site ORCID record for Younga Heather Lee For correspondence: HLEE73{at}mgh.harvard.edu nslopen{at}hsph.harvard.edu Yingzhe Zhang 4 Department of Epidemiology, Havard T. H. Chan School of Public Health , Boston, MA ScM Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site ORCID record for Yingzhe Zhang Ana Lucia Espinosa Dice 4 Department of Epidemiology, Havard T. H. Chan School of Public Health , Boston, MA MA Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site ORCID record for Ana Lucia Espinosa Dice Josephine H. Li 1 Center for Genomic Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital , Boston, MA 5 Diabetes Unit, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital , Boston, MA 6 Programs in Metabolism and Medical and Population Genetics, Broad Institute of Harvard and MIT , Cambridge, MA 7 Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School , Boston, MA MD Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site ORCID record for Josephine H. Li Justin D. Tubbs 1 Center for Genomic Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital , Boston, MA 2 Department of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School , Boston, MA PhD Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site ORCID record for Justin D. Tubbs Yen-Chen Anne Feng 1 Center for Genomic Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital , Boston, MA 2 Department of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School , Boston, MA 8 Institute of Health Data Analytics and Statistics, College of Public Health, National Taiwan University , Taipei, Taiwan MS, ScD Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site ORCID record for Yen-Chen Anne Feng Tian Ge 1 Center for Genomic Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital , Boston, MA 2 Department of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School , Boston, MA 9 Center for Precision Psychiatry, Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital , Boston, MA PhD Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site ORCID record for Tian Ge Adam X. Maihofer 10 Department of Psychiatry, University of California San Diego , La Jolla, CA 11 Veterans Affairs San Diego Healthcare System, Center of Excellence for Stress and Mental Health , San Diego, CA 12 Veterans Affairs San Diego Healthcare System, Research Service , San Diego, CA PhD Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site ORCID record for Adam X. Maihofer Caroline M. Nievergelt 10 Department of Psychiatry, University of California San Diego , La Jolla, CA 12 Veterans Affairs San Diego Healthcare System, Research Service , San Diego, CA PhD Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site ORCID record for Caroline M. Nievergelt Jordan W. Smoller 1 Center for Genomic Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital , Boston, MA 2 Department of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School , Boston, MA 9 Center for Precision Psychiatry, Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital , Boston, MA MD, ScD Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site ORCID record for Jordan W. Smoller Karestan C. Koenen 2 Department of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School , Boston, MA 3 Broad Trauma Initiative, Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard , Cambridge, MA 4 Department of Epidemiology, Havard T. H. Chan School of Public Health , Boston, MA 14 Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Havard T. H. Chan School of Public Health , Boston, MA PhD Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site ORCID record for Karestan C. Koenen Andrea L. Roberts 13 Department of Environmental Health, Havard T. H. Chan School of Public Health , Boston, MA PhD Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site ORCID record for Andrea L. Roberts Natalie Slopen 14 Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Havard T. H. Chan School of Public Health , Boston, MA 15 Center on the Developing Child, Harvard University , Cambridge, MA ScD Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site ORCID record for Natalie Slopen For correspondence: HLEE73{at}mgh.harvard.edu nslopen{at}hsph.harvard.edu Abstract Full Text Info/History Metrics Supplementary material Data/Code Preview PDF Abstract Importance Biomarkers can potentially improve the diagnosis, monitoring, and treatment of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). However, PTSD biomarkers that are scalable and easily integrated into real-world clinical settings have not been identified. Objective To triangulate phenotypic and genomic evidence from a health system biobank with a goal of identifying scalable and clinically relevant biomarkers for PTSD. Design, setting, and participants The analysis was conducted between June to November 2024 using genomic samples and laboratory test results recorded in the Mass General Brigham (MGB) Health System. The analysis included 23,743 European ancestry participants from the nested MGB Biobank study. Exposures The first exposure was polygenic risk score (PRS) for PTSD, calculated using the largest available European ancestry genome-wide association study (GWAS), employing a Bayesian polygenic scoring method. The second exposure was a clinical diagnosis of PTSD, determined by the presence of two or more qualifying PTSD phecodes in the longitudinal electronic health records (EHR). Main outcomes and measures The primary outcomes were the inverse normal quantile transformed, median lab values of 241 laboratory traits with non-zero h 2 SNP estimates. Results Sixteen unique laboratory traits across the cardiometabolic, hematologic, hepatic, and immune systems were implicated in both genomic and phenotypic lab-wide association scans (LabWAS). Two-sample Mendelian randomization analyses provided evidence of potential unidirectional causal effects of PTSD liability on five laboratory traits. Conclusion and relevance These findings demonstrate the potential of a triangulation approach to uncover scalable and clinically relevant biomarkers for PTSD. Question Is genetic liability or diagnosis of PTSD associated with clinical laboratory measures? Findings Among European ancestry participants in the MGB Biobank, we identified 16 unique laboratory traits in cardiometabolic, hematologic, hepatic, and immune systems that were both genetically and phenotypically associated with PTSD, with five markers demonstrating potential unidirectional causal effects of PTSD liability. Meaning Our findings reveal associations between PTSD and laboratory markers across multiple physiological systems, with evidence suggesting possible unidirectional causal effects of PTSD liability on cardiometabolic, hematologic, and hepatic markers. Introduction Previous epidemiologic investigations of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) have identified several potential biomarkers, primarily focusing on those related to the immune system. For instance, a recent meta-analysis reported elevated levels of inflammatory markers—such as C-reactive protein, interleukin6, and tumor necrosis factor-α—in individuals with PTSD, suggesting a dysregulated immune response as a potential pathophysiological mechanism. 1 However, by focusing on a narrow range of hypothesis-driven biomarkers, these studies may have overlooked other biological pathways involved in PTSD. Health system biobanks present a promising alternative for addressing this challenge as they can be linked to large-scale electronic health records (EHR) containing clinical diagnoses, prescriptions, and notably, an extensive array of laboratory test results. 2 The availability of such rich clinical phenotypes provides an opportunity to capture the complexity of real-world clinical presentations. The integrated data framework enables a comprehensive, hypothesis-free search for biomarkers that are not only scalable but also clinically relevant. Laboratory-wide association scan (LabWAS) represents an emerging data-driven analytic approach that leverages electronic laboratory measurements to systematically screen a broad spectrum of biomarkers associated with specific target conditions. 3 , 4 Initially implemented in cardiovascular disease, 3 LabWAS has since been adapted to uncover biological and physiological correlates of other complex disease conditions, including major depression, 4 neuroticism, 5 and PTSD. 6 By moving beyond the limitations of targeted, hypothesis-driven approach, LabWAS holds the potential to uncover novel biological pathways involved in PTSD. In this study, we extend our previous work 3 , 4 by integrating data-driven biomarker discovery with comprehensive clinical contextualization and genetic causal investigation. Specifically, we perform two complementary LabWAS analyses using genetic predisposition and clinical diagnosis of PTSD as predictors, leveraging EHR to identify scalable and clinically relevant biomarkers for PTSD. To further elucidate these biomarker-PTSD associations, we evaluate their clinical significance and potential causal mechanisms at the genomic level through two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) analyses. This integrated approach addresses key limitations of prior studies (e.g., limited clinical relevance and causal insights) and provides a robust framework for discovering novel biomarkers that may ultimately enhance the diagnosis and management of PTSD. 7 Methods Sample Description The Mass General Brigham (MGB) Biobank is a hospital-based research program launched in 2010 to support genomic and translational research for human health. 8 Participants are patients at MGB-affiliated hospitals older than age 18 years at the time of the recruitment who provided informed consent to join the Biobank. Each participant was asked to provide blood samples, which are then linked to their EHR (see Boutin et al., 2022 for further description on enrollment and sample collection). 8 Given the limited sample size of non-European ancestry participants in the MGB Biobank, 8 we restricted our analysis to participants of genetically determined European ancestry (see eMethods for details of our genotyping, genomic quality control (QC), imputation, and population assignment procedures). Among the European-ancestry participants, our final analytic sample included 23,743 participants with both high-quality genotype and laboratory test results (see eFigure 1 for the sample flowchart and eTables 2-10 for sample sizes for each analysis). This research was conducted under a protocol approved by the MGB Institutional Review Board (# 2019P003696). Primary Exposure: Bayesian Polygenic Risk Score (PRS) for PTSD (hereafter, PRS PTSD ) We used PRS-CS-Auto 9 , a Bayesian polygenic risk scoring method, to generate PRS for European ancestry participants. The weights for PRS were derived from the summary statistics from the most recent genome-wide association studies (GWAS) of PTSD by the Psychiatric Genomics Consortium, 10 excluding the MGB Biobank samples. We then calculated PRS for each participant by summing all risk-associated variants, weighted by their posterior effect size estimates inferred by PRS-CS-Auto, using PLINK, version 2.0. 11 Each PRS was subsequently adjusted for sex assigned at birth, age, and the top 10 ancestry principal components to adjust for potential confounding, and standardized to a mean of 0 and a standard deviation of 1. Secondary Exposure: PTSD Diagnosis (hereafter, Dx PTSD ) We identified PTSD cases by mapping all ICD-9CM and ICD-10CM codes used in MGB-affiliated hospitals to the phecode system 12 using the PheWAS R package. 13 We identified two qualifying ICD-9CM codes and five ICD-10CM codes for PTSD (using phecode 300.9; see eTable 1 ). Following our previous approach, 14 we defined cases as those having at least two qualifying diagnostic codes and the remaining participants as non-cases. Outcome: Clinical Laboratory Data We first extracted clinical laboratory data from the EHR of 2,344,551 MGB patients who self-identified as non-Hispanic White. Subsequently, we preprocessed the laboratory records using the QualityLab pipeline, previously validated in the MGB patient population. 3 This pipeline implements a series of filtering criteria—including, but not limited to, excluding lab traits with non-numeric values or limited sample sizes (e.g., requiring at least 100 patients, at least 1000 numeric observations), applying unit harmonization (e.g., requiring 70% of the observation measured in the same unit), and applying lab-specific quality control filters (e.g., removing clinically implausible, infinite, or extreme values that are more than four standard deviations from the overall sample mean). Following Dennis et al.’s approach, we extracted the median laboratory value for each patient and applied the inverse normal quantile transformation (INT) to address skewness and non-normality. 3 Lastly, we calculated SNP-based heritability ( h 2 SNP ) for all laboratory tests using restricted maximum likelihood (REML) methods in the genome-wide complex trait analysis (GCTA) software 15 and identified 241 lab traits with non-zero h 2 SNP estimates (hereafter, heritable lab traits) for the downstream LabWAS analysis. Further details about the sample size at each stage of preprocessing can be found in eFigure 1 . Laboratory-wide Association Scan (LabWAS) LabWAS is an innovative, data-driven approach that systematically examines the association between a predictor of interest (e.g., polygenic risk score or diagnostic status) and a wide array of clinical laboratory measurements. 3 LabWAS involves fitting a series of regression models (equivalent to the number of heritable labs traits resulting from the QualityLab pipeline) that predict the median, INT-transformed values of each heritable lab trait, adjusting for potential confounding factors. In the current study, we estimated associations of PRS PTSD and Dx PTSD with preprocessed lab traits, respectively, adjusting for age at lab measurement, sex assigned at birth (recorded in EHR), and the top 10 genetic PCs (see eMethods for details on genomic preprocessing). Subsequently, we identified markers that were statistically significant in both LabWAS analyses after a Bonferroni correction for the number of laboratory tests considered (i.e. 0.05/241). Recognizing potential heterogeneity in relationships between PTSD (both genetic and phenotypic) and lab traits by patient characteristics, we examined potential effect modification by sex assigned at birth. 16 , 17 Additionally, we identified clinically relevant traits that could impact the relationship between PRS PTSD and laboratory markers (see eFigure 2 ), including clinical diagnosis of PTSD, prescription history of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) recommended to treat PTSD symptoms, 18 and clinical diagnosis of obesity. Specifically, SSRIs with previously reported metabolic side effects—such as sertraline (RxNorm: 20610), paroxetine (RxNorm: 32937), and fluoxetine (RxNorm: 4493)—may contribute to metabolic dysfunction 19 by interfering with glucose and lipid metabolism as well as appetite control. Patients with an SSRI prescription history were defined as those with at least one prescription record for these medications. To capture weight gain associated with SSRI use, 20 we also extracted diagnostic information on obesity (phecode 278) and included it as an additional covariate. Two-sample Mendelian Randomization (MR) Analysis The LabWAS analyses are correlative rather than causal in nature, in part due to the lack of established temporality between PTSD and biomarkers in these data. Thus, following the LabWAS analysis, we performed two-sample MR to assess evidence for possible bidirectional causal relationships between PTSD and 16 unique heritable lab traits that revealed significant associations in both phenotypic and genomic LabWAS analyses (shown in Table 2 ). We used the largest publicly available GWAS summary statistics for PTSD (this time including the MGB samples) and each lab trait (see eTable 11 for details). We selected genetic instruments for each trait surpassing genome-wide significance (p ≤ 5×10⁻D) and performed clumping to ensure independence ( r² < 0.001 within a 10,000 kb window) using PLINK v2.0. 11 We then estimated bidirectional causal effects using multiple complementary methods—including inverse-variance weighted (IVW) regression, MR Egger, maximum likelihood, and weighted median approaches—to explore robustness of results under different model assumptions using the TwoSampleMR R package. 21 For MR findings to hold causal interpretation, stringent assumptions regarding the instrument(s) and their relationship to exposure and outcome must be met. Specifically, to test the causal null hypothesis (i.e., that exposure does not cause outcome) or to bound the causal effect, the genetic variant(s) used as instrument(s) must: (i) be strongly associated with exposure (i.e., relevance), (ii) have no common cause with the outcome (i.e., independence), and (iii) have effects on the outcome exclusively mediated by the exposure (i.e., exclusion restriction). 22 , 23 Only the first assumption may be evaluated empirically; the latter two are unverifiable and must instead be assessed for plausibility through a combination of subject-matter knowledge, falsification tests, and sensitivity analyses. 24 – 26 To estimate the magnitude and direction of the effect (i.e., to make meaning of the point estimate), a fourth assumption of either effect homogeneity or monotonicity is required, each with different implications regarding the interpretation of the causal effect estimate. 27 Given the implications of the latter assumption, rarely mentioned in MR studies, 27 – 29 we interpret the magnitude and direction of estimated effects from our two-sample MR with caution. Furthermore, we performed sensitivity analyses for horizontal pleiotropy, directional pleiotropy, and outliers potentially driving pleiotropic biases using the MR-Egger intercept test of deviation from the null, MR-Pleiotropy Residual Sum and Outlier (PRESSO), and leave-1-SNP-out analysis. Results Sample Characteristics We first examined participant characteristics in the overall analytic sample and subsamples stratified by the presence of PTSD diagnosis in the EHR. As shown in Table 1 , the sample was 53.3% female and had a mean age of 61.4 years in 2020. On average, participants with PTSD were significantly younger and more likely to be female (51.7 years of age and 65.7% female) than those without PTSD (61.8 years of age and 52.7% female). PTSD cases were more likely to have public insurance (82.1% vs. 61.4% in non-cases), less likely to be married or live with a partner (31.2% vs. 61.9% in non-cases) and lived in neighborhoods with lower median household income ($70,600) relative to non-cases ($77,100). View this table: View inline View popup Download powerpoint Table 1. Demographic characteristics of the sample included in the LabWAS analysis. Genomic and Phenotypic LabWAS LabWAS with PRS PTSD revealed statistically significant association with 29 laboratory traits (see Figure 1a and eTable 2 ). The strongest associations included higher triglyceride ( ß= 0.08, p= 4.59×10 -25 ), leukocytes ( ß= 0.06, p= 3.21×10 -21 ), glucose ( ß= 0.05, p= 2.20×10 -15 ), alkaline phosphatase ( ß= 0.05, p= 1.84×10 -13 ), and neutrophils ( ß= 0.05, p= 4.72×10 -13 ), erythrocyte distribution width ( ß= 0.04, p= 4.85×10 -10 ), lymphocytes ( ß= 0.04, p= 6.93×10 -10 ), monocytes ( ß= 0.04, p= 2.22×10 -8 ), and hemoglobin A1c ( ß= 0.04, p= 7.71×10 -8 ), as well as lower levels of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol ( ß= -0.05, p= 2.04×10 -10 ), and potassium ( ß= -0.04, p= 3.47×10 -10 ). Download figure Open in new tab Figure 1. Manhattan plots of lab-wide association scans (LabWAS) using (a) polygenic risk score for posttraumatic stress disorder (PRS PTSD ) as a predictor (left), and (b) PTSD diagnosis (Dx PTSD ) as a predictor (right). Lymphocytes* refers to automated lymphocyte count. LabWAS with Dx PTSD revealed 34 laboratory traits reaching statistical significance (see Figure 1b and eTable 3 ), generally with larger effect estimates than seen in the LabWAS with PRS PTSD . The strongest associations included higher lymphocytes ( ß= 0.37, p= 2.72×10 -32 ) and triglyceride ( ß= 0.27, p= 4.72×10 -15 ), and lower bilirubin ( ß= -0.29, p= 2.52×10 -23 ) and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol ( ß= -0.30, p= 5.47×10 -20 ). Other notable findings included higher erythrocyte distribution width ( ß= 0.22, p= 8.31×10 -14 ), alkaline phosphatase ( ß= 0.23, p= 3.07×10 - 13 ), and lower urea nitrogen ( ß= -0.17, p= 2.07×10 -10 ), potassium ( ß= -0.19, p= 2.47×10 -10 ), and mean platelet volume ( ß= -0.37, p= 4.94×10 -10 ). Triangulation of Genomic and Phenotypic Evidence Sixteen unique laboratory markers were statistically significant in both genetic and phenotypic analyses with concordant directions of association (see Figure 2 , Table 2 ). These overlapping findings spanned multiple biological systems: seven cardiometabolic markers (vitamin D and urea nitrogen had negative associations, while very low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and glucose had positive associations), two hematologic markers (erythrocyte distribution width showing positive association, mean platelet volume showing negative associations), three hepatic markers (albumin, alkaline phosphatase, and bilirubin showing positive associations), and four immune markers (leukocytes, eosinophils, lymphocytes, and monocytes showing positive associations). Notably, three markers (erythrocyte distribution width, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, triglycerides) showed consistent associations with PRS PTSD and Dx PTSD in sex-stratified analyses, despite reduced statistical power (see eFigure 2, eTable 4-5 for genomic LabWAS; eFigure 3, eTable 6-7 for phenotypic LabWAS). Download figure Open in new tab Figure 2. Triangulation of results across PRS PTSD and Dx PTSD LabWAS, grouped by physiological systems. Statistical significance after Bonferroni correction from the genomic LabWAS (shown in triangles) and phenotypic LabWAS (shown in circles), grouped by physiological systems. Physiological systems are sorted alphabetically (top to bottom). Within each system, results are sorted alphabetically (left to right). Number of outcomes per system is listed in parentheses on the y-axis. All sixteen unique markers that are statistically significant in both analyses are concordant in the direction of association. Numeric estimates from the genomic and phenotypic LabWAS can be found in eTables 2 and 3 , respectively. View this table: View inline View popup Table 2. Prior observational and genetic evidence linking PTSD with 16 unique heritable lab traits that were significant in both genomic and phenotypic LabWAS analyses. Several associations from our main analyses were attenuated after adjusting for additional clinical factors (see eFigure 4 ). Three markers associated with PRS PTSD (albumin, platelets, eosinophils) lost significance after adjusting for PTSD diagnosis (comparing eTable 8 against eTable 2 ), mean corpuscular volume after additionally adjusting for SSRI use (comparing eTable 9 against eTable 8 ), and three markers (very low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, C-reactive protein, glucose mean value) no longer reached significance after further adjusting for obesity diagnosis (comparing eTable 10 against eTable 9 ). Notably, the majority of PRS PTSD associations from our primary model remained significant after controlling for PTSD diagnosis, SSRI use, and obesity diagnosis. Genomic Causal Inference Our two-sample MR analyses revealed evidence suggesting unidirectional causal effects. We found no evidence for the causal effects of laboratory traits on PTSD across all MR methods (see eTable 12 ). However, when PTSD liability was modeled as the exposure , evidence for statistically significant causal effects emerged across multiple physiological systems (see eTable 13 ). Across all MR methods examined, higher liability for PTSD was causally linked with alterations in hepatic markers, including decreased levels of albumin (IVW ß = -3.67×10⁻D, p = 0.0039) and total bilirubin (IVW ß = -4.55×10⁻D, p = 5.50×10⁻D). In the cardiometabolic system, PTSD liability exhibited causal relationships with an adverse lipid profile, characterized by decreased high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (IVW ß = -4.27×10⁻D, p = 0.00068) and increased very low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (IVW ß = 4.65×10⁻D, p = 0.0206). In the hematologic system, higher liability for PTSD showed evidence for causal effects on reduced mean platelet volume (IVW ß = -6.59×10⁻D, p = 0.0043), suggesting altered platelet function. While maximum likelihood estimates indicated positive causal effects of PTSD on leukocytes, lymphocytes, and monocytes, these associations were inconsistent across MR methods and warrant cautious interpretation. In summary, our findings suggest that while laboratory traits do not causally impact PTSD, liability for PTSD may induce specific physiological changes— particularly in hepatic, cardiometabolic, and hematological systems—that could represent biological consequences of the disorder. Discussion Our findings identified clinically relevant laboratory markers spanning across cardiometabolic, hematologic, hepatic, and immune systems. These results align with existing research, which has similarly implicated biomarkers—especially immune and metabolic dysregulations—in individuals having genetic predispositions for PTSD 6 as well as those having PTSD diagnosis. 30 , 31 We additionally found potential variations by sex assigned at birth and clinical factors, such as documented PTSD diagnoses and use of psychotropic medications with potential metabolic side effects. 32 These findings warrant further investigation to better understand the interplay between PTSD, treatments, and subsequent metabolic dysregulations. Our findings on the association of both PRS PTSD and DX PTSD with cardiometabolic, hematologic, hepatic, and immune markers not only align with but also extend prior evidence linking PTSD to increased risk of cardiometabolic, 33 hepatic, 34 and immunological 1 conditions. Notably, we uncovered novel relationships between PTSD and hematologic markers, particularly the positive relationships between PRS PTSD and Dx PTSD with erythrocyte distribution width, as well as the negative relationships with mean platelet volume. These findings complement recent studies suggesting a shared genetic architecture of PTSD with erythrocyte distribution width 6 , 35 and mean platelet volume, 36 respectively. Furthermore, the observed association between PTSD and vitamin D is noteworthy given emerging research examining the role of vitamin D in shaping the risk of and treatment of internalizing disorders, such as depression and PTSD. 37 – 39 The search for biomarkers of PTSD is ongoing, and further research is needed for before these laboratory measures can be used clinically for risk stratification, diagnostics, prognosis, or treatment selection. 40 Decades of evidence have linked PTSD to widespread physiological dysregulation, including disruptions in stress response system (hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis and sympathetic nervous system), as well as cardiometabolic and immune functions. 41 More recently, in line with our approach, a growing body of research has leveraged data-driven strategies to develop scalable methods for generating novel and actionable insights, such as multi-omics phenotyping 35 and machine learning-based diagnostic panel discovery. 36 Strengths and Limitations Our study has several strengths that contribute to the growing body of research on PTSD biomarkers. First, while military cohorts have been instrumental in advancing PTSD genetics research, our use of a health system-based biobank complements this work by providing a balanced sex distribution and representation of civilian populations. This broader demographic coverage enhances the generalizability of our results. Second, this study examines an extensive array of biomarkers, thereby enhancing the potential for discovering novel biomarker targets at scale. Third, our study leverages laboratory tests routinely ordered in clinical care, facilitating future validation studies in real-world settings. Fourth, as shown in Table 2 , we provide in-depth contextualization of the biomarkers that show strong associations with PRS PTSD and Dx PTSD by describing the leading clinical indications for these laboratory tests and synthesizing prior phenotypic and genetic evidence in relation to PTSD. Finally, by utilizing two-sample MR, we are able to assess evidence for bidirectional causality —albeit under strong, unverifiable assumptions—using genetic instruments from large-scale GWAS. However, study findings need to be interpreted in light of several limitations regarding the LabWAS analyses. To create usable data from the high-dimensional, longitudinal laboratory records, we implemented the QualityLab preprocessing pipeline that dramatically reduces dimensionality by extracting the median value from each patient’s repeated laboratory measurements. While this approach facilitates downstream analyses, it prevents the ascertainment of temporal sequences of clinical events. While genomic LabWAS may be less susceptible to this limitation compared to phenotypic LabWAS, it can still be biased if the training GWAS for PRS PTSD introduces other sources of bias, such as selection bias and misclassification of PTSD. Furthermore, the ascertainment of trauma and PTSD is particularly challenging in EHR due to unmeasured factors such as social stigma, challenges in accessing care. 42 In addition, the DSM-5 criteria for PTSD require a confirmed trauma exposure; thus, inaccuracies in measuring trauma exposure can lead to inaccuracies in diagnosing PTSD. Moreover, the fragmented nature of healthcare utilization, especially among patients who navigate between private practices and tertiary hospitals, further complicates an accurate ascertainment of trauma and PTSD. 43 Lastly, additional limitations regarding our two-sample MR analyses must be considered. Most importantly, the validity of our MR findings relies on strong assumptions that cannot be directly tested. Of key concern is horizontal pleiotropy— where SNPs influence the outcome through pathways independent of the exposure—which would violate the exclusion restriction assumption and invalidate tests of the causal null hypothesis using the IVW estimator. 27 In addition, sample overlap in the GWASs of PTSD and laboratory markers may bias our estimates; however, this bias is expected to be small given our strong instruments and moderate sample overlap. 44 Future Directions Future studies should replicate our findings across health systems, particularly those serving populations highly impacted by trauma or PTSD. In addition, future investigations are necessary to establish temporal sequence of biomarker measurement, PTSD diagnosis, and relevant clinical factors (e.g., SSRI prescription, metabolic dysfunction) to derive clinical insights most relevant for a specific translational objective (e.g., biological underpinnings of the target condition or the effects of treatment or comorbid conditions). In addition, analytic approaches to incorporate high-dimensional, temporal trajectories of laboratory measurements could further refine our understanding of PTSD biomarkers. Moreover, to further enhance the clinical utility of PTSD biomarkers for diagnostic tools and personalized treatments, future research should consider evaluating how the actual (i.e. untransformed) laboratory values compare to established clinical reference ranges and more rigorously assessing potential causal mechanisms in the observed associations. Data Availability With appropriate Institutional Review Board approval, Mass General Brigham (MGB) investigators and research groups can access genomic data from over 65,000 MGB Biobank participants at no cost, along with their linked clinical data, health information, and survey responses. Financial Support Financial support for the Psychiatric Genomics Consortium (PGC) PTSD Working Group was provided by the Cohen Veterans Bioscience, Stanley Center for Psychiatric Research at the Broad Institute, One Mind, and the National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH; R01MH106595, R01MH124847, R01MH124851, R01MH118233). JHL is individually supported by NIDDK K23 DK131345. YHL and NS are supported by the Broad Trauma Initiative. ALED is supported by NIMH (T32 MH 017119). Disclosures JWS is a member of the Scientific Advisory Board of Sensorium Therapeutics (with options), has received a consulting fee from Data Driven, Inc., and has received grant support from Biogen, Inc. KCK receives consulting fees from the US Department of Justice and Covington Burling LLP and has royalites from Guilford Press and Oxford University Press. Acknowledgements This study would not be possible without the contributions of Mass General Brigham (MGB) patients and Biobank participants. We would also like to thank the research coordinators and the MGB Biobank study for their tremendous effort in participant recruitment and sample collection. Lastly, we would like to acknowledge the MGB Research Patient Data Registry (RPDR) team for their work maintaining the enterprise research patient data warehouse. References 1. ↵ Katrinli , S. , Oliveira , N. C. S. , Felger , J. C. , Michopoulos , V. & Smith , A. K . The role of the immune system in posttraumatic stress disorder . Transl. Psychiatry 12 , 313 ( 2022 ). OpenUrl PubMed 2. ↵ Gottesman , O. et al. The Electronic Medical Records and Genomics (eMERGE) Network: past, present, and future . Genet. Med . 15 , 761 – 771 ( 2013 ). OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 3. ↵ Dennis , J. K. et al. Clinical laboratory test-wide association scan of polygenic scores identifies biomarkers of complex disease . Genome Med . 13 , 6 ( 2021 ). OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 4. ↵ Sealock , J. M. et al. Use of the PsycheMERGE network to investigate the association between depression polygenic scores and white blood cell count . JAMA Psychiatry 78 , 1365 – 1374 ( 2021 ). OpenUrl PubMed 5. ↵ Wendt , F. R. et al. Sex-specific genetic and transcriptomic liability to neuroticism . Biol. Psychiatry 93 , 243 – 252 ( 2023 ). OpenUrl PubMed 6. ↵ Pathak , G. A. et al. Genetic liability to posttraumatic stress disorder symptoms and its association with cardiometabolic and respiratory outcomes . JAMA Psychiatry 81 , 34 – 44 ( 2024 ). OpenUrl PubMed 7. ↵ Linnstaedt , S. D. , Zannas , A. S. , McLean , S. A. , Koenen , K. C. & Ressler , K. J . Literature review and methodological considerations for understanding circulating risk biomarkers following trauma exposure . Mol. Psychiatry 25 , 1986 – 1999 ( 2020 ). OpenUrl PubMed 8. ↵ Boutin , N. T. et al. The evolution of a large Biobank at mass general Brigham . J. Pers. Med . 12 , 1323 ( 2022 ). OpenUrl PubMed 9. ↵ Ge , T. , Chen , C.-Y. , Ni , Y. , Feng , Y.-C. A. & Smoller , J. W . Polygenic prediction via Bayesian regression and continuous shrinkage priors . Nat. Commun . 10 , 1776 ( 2019 ). OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 10. ↵ Nievergelt , C. M. et al. Genome-wide association analyses identify 95 risk loci and provide insights into the neurobiology of post-traumatic stress disorder . Nat. Genet . 56 , 792 – 808 ( 2024 ). OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 11. ↵ Chang , C. C. et al. Second-generation PLINK: rising to the challenge of larger and richer datasets . Gigascience 4 , 7 ( 2015 ). OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 12. ↵ Denny , J. C. et al. PheWAS: demonstrating the feasibility of a phenome-wide scan to discover gene-disease associations . Bioinformatics 26 , 1205 – 1210 ( 2010 ). OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Web of Science 13. ↵ Carroll , R. J. , Bastarache , L. & Denny , J. C . R PheWAS: data analysis and plotting tools for phenome-wide association studies in the R environment . Bioinformatics 30 , 2375 – 2376 ( 2014 ). OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Web of Science 14. ↵ Zheutlin , A. B. et al. Penetrance and pleiotropy of polygenic risk scores for schizophrenia in 106,160 patients across four health care systems . Am. J. Psychiatry 176 , 846 – 855 ( 2019 ). OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 15. ↵ Yang , J. , Lee , S. H. , Goddard , M. E. & Visscher , P. M . GCTA: a tool for genome-wide complex trait analysis . Am. J. Hum. Genet . 88 , 76 – 82 ( 2011 ). OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 16. ↵ Kim , G. S. et al. Methylomic profiles reveal sex-specific differences in leukocyte composition associated with post-traumatic stress disorder . Brain Behav. Immun . 81 , 280 – 291 ( 2019 ). OpenUrl PubMed 17. ↵ Ponomareva , O. Y. & Ressler , K. J . Genomic factors underlying sex differences in trauma-related disorders . Neurobiol. Stress 14 , 100330 ( 2021 ). OpenUrl PubMed 18. ↵ Department of Veterans Affairs and Department of Defense . VA/DOD Clinical Practice Guideline for the Management of Posttraumatic Stress Disorder and Acute Stress Disorder . https://www.healthquality.va.gov/guidelines/MH/ptsd/ ( 2023 ). 19. ↵ Gramaglia , C. et al. Increased risk of metabolic syndrome in antidepressants users: A mini review . Front. Psychiatry 9 , ( 2018 ). 20. ↵ Grundy , A. , Cotterchio , M. , Kirsh , V. A. & Kreiger , N . Associations between anxiety, depression, antidepressant medication, obesity and weight gain among Canadian women . PLoS One 9 , e99780 ( 2014 ). OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 21. ↵ Hemani , G. et al. The MR-Base platform supports systematic causal inference across the human phenome . Elife 7 , ( 2018 ). 22. ↵ Davey Smith , G. & Hemani , G. Mendelian randomization: genetic anchors for causal inference in epidemiological studies . Hum. Mol. Genet . 23 , R89 – 98 ( 2014 ). OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Web of Science 23. ↵ Smith , G. D. & Ebrahim , S . “Mendelian randomization”: can genetic epidemiology contribute to understanding environmental determinants of disease? Int. J. Epidemiol . 32 , 1 – 22 ( 2003 ). OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Web of Science 24. ↵ Glymour , M. M. , Tchetgen Tchetgen , E. J. & Robins , J. M . Credible Mendelian randomization studies: approaches for evaluating the instrumental variable assumptions . Am. J. Epidemiol . 175 , 332 – 339 ( 2012 ). OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Web of Science 25. Swanson , S. A. & Hernán , M. A. Commentary . Epidemiology 24 , 370 – 374 ( 2013 ). OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Web of Science 26. ↵ Labrecque , J. & Swanson , S. A . Understanding the assumptions underlying instrumental variable analyses: A brief review of falsification strategies and related tools . Curr. Epidemiol. Rep . 5 , 214 – 220 ( 2018 ). OpenUrl PubMed 27. ↵ Sheehan , N. A. & Didelez , V. Epidemiology, genetic epidemiology and Mendelian randomisation: more need than ever to attend to detail . Hum. Genet . 139 , 121 – 136 ( 2020 ). OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 28. Davies , N. M. , Smith , G. D. , Windmeijer , F. & Martin , R. M . Issues in the reporting and conduct of instrumental variable studies: a systematic review . Epidemiology 24 , 363 – 369 ( 2013 ). OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Web of Science 29. ↵ Islam , S. N. , Ahammed , T. , Anjum , A. , Albalawi , O. & Uddin , M. J . Reporting methodological issues of the mendelian randomization studies in health and medical research: a systematic review . BMC Med. Res. Methodol . 22 , 21 ( 2022 ). OpenUrl PubMed 30. ↵ Lawn , R. B. et al. Trauma, psychological distress and markers of systemic inflammation among US women: A longitudinal study . Psychoneuroendocrinology 145 , 105915 ( 2022 ). OpenUrl PubMed 31. ↵ Roberts , A. L. et al. Posttraumatic stress disorder and incidence of type 2 diabetes mellitus in a sample of women: a 22-year longitudinal study: A 22-year longitudinal study . JAMA Psychiatry 72 , 203 – 210 ( 2015 ). OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 32. ↵ Sepúlveda-Lizcano , L. et al. Metabolic adverse effects of psychotropic drug therapy: A systematic review . Eur. J. Investig. Health Psychol. Educ . 13 , 1505 – 1520 ( 2023 ). OpenUrl PubMed 33. ↵ O’Donnell , C. J. et al. Posttraumatic Stress Disorder and Cardiovascular Disease: State of the Science , Knowledge Gaps, and Research Opportunities. JAMA Cardiol 6 , 1207 – 1216 ( 2021 ). OpenUrl PubMed 34. ↵ Shaffer , L. R. , Kaplan , D. E. , Taddei , T. H. & Mahmud , N. The association between mental illness and all-cause mortality in patients with cirrhosis: a Veterans Affairs retrospective cohort study . Hepatol. Commun. 7 , e0129 ( 2023 ). OpenUrl 35. ↵ Pathak , G. A. et al. Genetically regulated multi-omics study for symptom clusters of posttraumatic stress disorder highlights pleiotropy with hematologic and cardio-metabolic traits . Mol. Psychiatry 27 , 1394 – 1404 ( 2022 ). OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 36. ↵ Dean , K. R. et al. Multi-omic biomarker identification and validation for diagnosing warzone-related post-traumatic stress disorder . Mol. Psychiatry 25 , 3337 – 3349 ( 2020 ). OpenUrl PubMed 37. ↵ Jamilian , H. et al. The effects of vitamin D supplementation on mental health, and biomarkers of inflammation and oxidative stress in patients with psychiatric disorders: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials . Prog. Neuropsychopharmacol. Biol. Psychiatry 94 , 109651 ( 2019 ). OpenUrl PubMed 38. Terock , J. et al. Posttraumatic stress disorder is associated with reduced vitamin D levels and functional polymorphisms of the vitamin D binding-protein in a population-based sample . Prog. Neuropsychopharmacol. Biol. Psychiatry 96 , 109760 ( 2020 ). OpenUrl PubMed 39. ↵ Konzok , J. , Baumeister , S.-E. , Winkler , T. W. , Leitzmann , M. F. & Baurecht , H . Effect of 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels on the internalising dimension as a transdiagnostic risk factor: Mendelian randomisation study . Br. J. Psychiatry 222 , 257 – 263 ( 2023 ). OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 40. ↵ Yang , S. , Wynn , G. H. & Ursano , R. J . A Clinician’s Guide to PTSD Biomarkers and Their Potential Future Use . Focus 16 , 143 – 152 ( 2018 ). OpenUrl 41. ↵ Michopoulos , V. , Norrholm , S. D. & Jovanovic , T . Diagnostic Biomarkers for Posttraumatic Stress Disorder: Promising Horizons from Translational Neuroscience Research . Biol. Psychiatry 78 , 344 – 353 ( 2015 ). OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 42. ↵ DeViva , J. C. et al. Correlates of VA mental health treatment utilization among OEF/OIF/OND veterans: Resilience, stigma, social support, personality, and beliefs about treatment . Psychol. Trauma 8 , 310 – 318 ( 2016 ). OpenUrl PubMed 43. ↵ Jin , Y. , Schneeweiss , S. , Merola , D. & Lin , K. J . Impact of longitudinal data-completeness of electronic health record data on risk score misclassification . J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc . 29 , 1225 – 1232 ( 2022 ). OpenUrl PubMed 44. ↵ Burgess , S. , Davies , N. M. & Thompson , S. G . Bias due to participant overlap in two-sample Mendelian randomization . Genet. Epidemiol . 40 , 597 – 608 ( 2016 ). OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 45. Medical Tests . MedlinePlus https://medlineplus.gov/lab-tests/ . 46. Body Systems & Organs . ClevelandClinic https://my.clevelandclinic.org/health/body . 47. Jacquet-Smailovic , M. et al. Relationship between Post-traumatic Stress Disorder and subsequent myocardial infarction: a systematic review and meta-analysis . J. Affect. Disord . 297 , 525 – 535 ( 2022 ). OpenUrl PubMed 48. Bharti , V. , Bhardwaj , A. , Elias , D. A. , Metcalfe , A. W. S. & Kim , J. S . A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Lipid Signatures in Post-traumatic Stress Disorder . Front. Psychiatry 13 , 847310 ( 2022 ). OpenUrl PubMed 49. Edmondson , D. & von Känel , R . Post-traumatic stress disorder and cardiovascular disease . Lancet Psychiatry 4 , 320 – 329 ( 2017 ). OpenUrl PubMed 50. Polimanti , R. et al. Understanding the comorbidity between posttraumatic stress severity and coronary artery disease using genome-wide information and electronic health records . Mol. Psychiatry 27 , 3961 – 3969 ( 2022 ). OpenUrl PubMed 51. Seligowski , A. V. , Misganaw , B. , Duffy , L. A. , Ressler , K. J. & Guffanti , G . Leveraging large-scale genetics of PTSD and cardiovascular disease to demonstrate robust shared risk and improve risk prediction accuracy . Am. J. Psychiatry 179 , 814 – 823 ( 2022 ). OpenUrl PubMed 52. Lukas , E. et al. A genetic exploration of the relationship between Posttraumatic Stress Disorder and cardiovascular diseases . medRxiv ( 2024 ) doi: 10.1101/2024.03.20.24304533 . OpenUrl Abstract / FREE Full Text 53. Misganaw , B. et al. The Genetic Basis for the Increased Prevalence of Metabolic Syndrome among Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder Patients . Int. J. Mol. Sci . 23 , ( 2022 ). 54. Chen , W. et al. Mendelian randomization analyses identify bidirectional causal relationships of obesity with psychiatric disorders . J. Affect. Disord . 339 , 807 – 814 ( 2023 ). OpenUrl PubMed 55. Lindqvist , D. et al. Increased circulating blood cell counts in combat-related PTSD: Associations with inflammation and PTSD severity . Psychiatry Res . 258 , 330 – 336 ( 2017 ). OpenUrl PubMed 56. Xu , M. et al. Screening for PTSD and TBI in Veterans using Routine Clinical Laboratory Blood Tests . Transl. Psychiatry 13 , 64 ( 2023 ). OpenUrl PubMed 57. Jiang , T. et al. Posttraumatic stress disorder and incident infections: A nationwide cohort study . Epidemiology 30 , 911 – 917 ( 2019 ). OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 58. Hicks , E. M. et al. Comorbidity profiles of posttraumatic stress disorder across the medical phenome . medRxiv ( 2023 ) doi: 10.1101/2023.08.25.23294572 . OpenUrl Abstract / FREE Full Text 59. Forehand , J. A. et al. Causes of excess mortality in Veterans treated for posttraumatic stress disorder . Am. J. Prev. Med . 57 , 145 – 152 ( 2019 ). OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 60. McCauley , J. L. , Killeen , T. , Gros , D. F. , Brady , K. T. & Back , S. E . Posttraumatic Stress Disorder and Co-Occurring Substance Use Disorders: Advances in Assessment and Treatment . Clin. Psychol . 19 , ( 2012 ). 61. Shiner , B. et al. Mining Clinical Data for Novel Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Medications . Biol. Psychiatry 91 , 647 – 657 ( 2022 ). OpenUrl PubMed 62. Shiner , B. et al. Comparative Effectiveness of Direct-Acting Antivirals for Posttraumatic Stress Disorder in Veterans Affairs Patients With Hepatitis C Virus Infection . Am. J. Epidemiol . 191 , 1614 – 1625 ( 2022 ). OpenUrl PubMed 63. Zhou , S. et al. Investigating the shared genetic architecture of post-traumatic stress disorder and gastrointestinal tract disorders: a genome-wide cross-trait analysis . Psychol. Med . 53 , 7627 – 7635 ( 2023 ). OpenUrl PubMed 64. Hori , H. & Kim , Y. Inflammation and post-traumatic stress disorder . Psychiatry Clin. Neurosci. 73 , 143 – 153 ( 2019 ). OpenUrl 65. Peruzzolo , T. L. et al. Inflammatory and oxidative stress markers in post-traumatic stress disorder: a systematic review and meta-analysis . Mol. Psychiatry 27 , 3150 – 3163 ( 2022 ). OpenUrl PubMed 66. Yang , J.-J. & Jiang , W . Immune biomarkers alterations in post-traumatic stress disorder: A systematic review and meta-analysis . J. Affect. Disord . 268 , 39 – 46 ( 2020 ). OpenUrl PubMed 67. Maihofer , A. X. et al. Effects of genetically predicted posttraumatic stress disorder on autoimmune phenotypes . Transl. Psychiatry 14 , 172 ( 2024 ). OpenUrl PubMed 68. Muniz Carvalho , C. , et al. Dissecting the genetic association of C-reactive protein with PTSD, traumatic events, and social support . Neuropsychopharmacology 46 , 1071 – 1077 ( 2021 ). OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 69. Zeng , Y. et al. Genetic Associations Between Stress-Related Disorders and Autoimmune Disease . Am. J. Psychiatry 180 , 294 – 304 ( 2023 ). OpenUrl PubMed View the discussion thread. Back to top Previous Next Posted February 28, 2025. Download PDF Supplementary Material Data/Code Email Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv. NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article. Your Email * Your Name * Send To * Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas. You are going to email the following Towards Scalable Biomarker Discovery in Posttraumatic Stress Disorder: Triangulating Genomic and Phenotypic Evidence from a Health System Biobank Message Subject (Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv Message Body (Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website. Your Personal Message CAPTCHA This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions. Share Towards Scalable Biomarker Discovery in Posttraumatic Stress Disorder: Triangulating Genomic and Phenotypic Evidence from a Health System Biobank Younga Heather Lee , Yingzhe Zhang , Ana Lucia Espinosa Dice , Josephine H. Li , Justin D. Tubbs , Yen-Chen Anne Feng , Tian Ge , Adam X. Maihofer , Caroline M. Nievergelt , Jordan W. Smoller , Karestan C. Koenen , Andrea L. Roberts , Natalie Slopen medRxiv 2025.02.27.25322886; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.02.27.25322886 Share This Article: Copy Citation Tools Towards Scalable Biomarker Discovery in Posttraumatic Stress Disorder: Triangulating Genomic and Phenotypic Evidence from a Health System Biobank Younga Heather Lee , Yingzhe Zhang , Ana Lucia Espinosa Dice , Josephine H. Li , Justin D. Tubbs , Yen-Chen Anne Feng , Tian Ge , Adam X. Maihofer , Caroline M. Nievergelt , Jordan W. Smoller , Karestan C. Koenen , Andrea L. Roberts , Natalie Slopen medRxiv 2025.02.27.25322886; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.02.27.25322886 Citation Manager Formats BibTeX Bookends EasyBib EndNote (tagged) EndNote 8 (xml) Medlars Mendeley Papers RefWorks Tagged Ref Manager RIS Zotero Tweet Widget Facebook Like Google Plus One Subject Area Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology Subject Areas All Articles Addiction Medicine (568) Allergy and Immunology (863) Anesthesia (298) Cardiovascular Medicine (4421) Dentistry and Oral Medicine (443) Dermatology (382) Emergency Medicine (607) Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (1507) Epidemiology (15213) Forensic Medicine (30) Gastroenterology (1122) Genetic and Genomic Medicine (6581) Geriatric Medicine (667) Health Economics (996) Health Informatics (4521) Health Policy (1366) Health Systems and Quality Improvement (1611) Hematology (540) HIV/AIDS (1264) Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (15906) Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (1103) Medical Education (621) Medical Ethics (144) Nephrology (667) Neurology (6580) Nursing (345) Nutrition (998) Obstetrics and Gynecology (1142) Occupational and Environmental Health (956) Oncology (3326) Ophthalmology (970) Orthopedics (369) Otolaryngology (420) Pain Medicine (435) Palliative Medicine (129) Pathology (663) Pediatrics (1690) Pharmacology and Therapeutics (691) Primary Care Research (710) Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (5435) Public and Global Health (9213) Radiology and Imaging (2193) Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (1368) Respiratory Medicine (1194) Rheumatology (593) Sexual and Reproductive Health (709) Sports Medicine (529) Surgery (709) Toxicology (99) Transplantation (288) Urology (265) (function(){function c(){var b=a.contentDocument||a.contentWindow.document;if(b){var d=b.createElement('script');d.innerHTML="window.__CF$cv$params={r:'9ff6c414da8b593a',t:'MTc3OTM5OTkwMw=='};var a=document.createElement('script');a.src='/cdn-cgi/challenge-platform/scripts/jsd/main.js';document.getElementsByTagName('head')[0].appendChild(a);";b.getElementsByTagName('head')[0].appendChild(d)}}if(document.body){var a=document.createElement('iframe');a.height=1;a.width=1;a.style.position='absolute';a.style.top=0;a.style.left=0;a.style.border='none';a.style.visibility='hidden';document.body.appendChild(a);if('loading'!==document.readyState)c();else if(window.addEventListener)document.addEventListener('DOMContentLoaded',c);else{var e=document.onreadystatechange||function(){};document.onreadystatechange=function(b){e(b);'loading'!==document.readyState&&(document.onreadystatechange=e,c())}}}})();

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: preprint-html

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-05-22T02:00:06.705733+00:00
License: CC-BY-NC-ND-4.0