Abstract
1 Cells are often assumed to require a ∼1% difference in ligand concentration across their length to bias chemotaxis, but this Δ C framework overlooks the non-linear relation between ligand concen-tration and receptor activation and, for linear gradients, is uninformative with respect to gradient steepness. Using mathematical modelling and experiments in linear gradients of the non-degradable cAMP analogue Sp-cAMPS, we show that ligand concentration alone does not describe chemotactic behaviour. By expressing signals as the differential proportion of activated receptors (ΔΩ), we find that cells can detect differences as small as 0.026% across their length. Importantly, the minimum differential required to induce bias increases with overall receptor activation, demonstrating that chemotactic sensitivity depends on the receptor occupancy regime rather than on Δ C . The true minimal chemotactic threshold therefore lies at concentrations that minimise receptor activation while still eliciting a bias, and is likely to be below 0.026%.
Full text
1,129 characters
· extracted from
oa-doi-fallback
· click to expand
1 Abstract
Cells are often assumed to require a ∼1% difference in ligand concentration across their length to bias chemotaxis, but this ΔC framework overlooks the non-linear relation between ligand concen-tration and receptor activation and, for linear gradients, is uninformative with respect to gradient steepness. Using mathematical modelling and experiments in linear gradients of the non-degradable cAMP analogue Sp-cAMPS, we show that ligand concentration alone does not describe chemotactic behaviour. By expressing signals as the differential proportion of activated receptors (ΔΩ), we find that cells can detect differences as small as 0.026% across their length. Importantly, the minimum differential required to induce bias increases with overall receptor activation, demonstrating that chemotactic sensitivity depends on the receptor occupancy regime rather than on ΔC. The true minimal chemotactic threshold therefore lies at concentrations that minimise receptor activation while still eliciting a bias, and is likely to be below 0.026%.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below.
Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure
cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can
have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy
(via DOI)
is the canonical version.