Effects of cash transfer and incentive programs on service utilization and treatment outcomes related to neglected tropical diseases and their impact on health and nutrition in low and middle-income countries: a protocol for a systematic review

preprint OA: closed CC-BY-4.0
📄 Open PDF Full text JSON View at publisher

Abstract

ABSTRACT Background Although there has been a general decrease in the global burden on Neglected tropical diseases (NTDs), progress is not on track to meet the Sustainable Development Goals 2030. Evidence suggests the positive effect of conditional cash transfer programs on controlling NTDs. However, it is to be evaluated whether other financial incentive programs exert similar effects on NTD-related service utilization and treatment outcomes and, in turn, on health and nutrition in low and middle-income countries (LMICs). This proposed systematic review aims to evaluate the effects of cash transfer and incentive programs on NTD-related service utilization and treatment outcomes in LMICs, to examine how covariates, program design, implementation plan, and incentive program design influence these outcomes, and to examine how NTD-related these outcomes influence nutritional status and health in LMICs. Methods This systematic review will follow the PICOS (Population, Interventions, Comparators, Outcomes, Studies) framework. The population of this review will be restricted to the adult population and children of all ages of LMICs. For intervention selection, we will include any program or policies addressing socioeconomic disadvantage through the provision of cash transfers or incentive programs, including but not limited to in-kind transfers, food vouchers, free medicine vouchers, discount coupons, and micro-credit to households or individuals. Eligible comparators will be the population who did not receive any intervention, recipients of interventions from before the intervention, and populations or areas exposed to different levels of intervention coverage. The primary outcomes of interest will be service utilization and treatment outcomes related to any of the 21 NTDs and disease groups prioritized by WHO. Secondary outcomes include variables related to general health and nutrition outcomes. Discussion To provide a comprehensive and unbiased assessment of the current state of knowledge on the effects of cash transfer and other financial incentive programs on NTD-related service utilization and treatment outcomes in LMICs, conducting a systematic review is crucial. This systematic review will provide comprehensive, and unbiased evidence considering the strengths and limitations of existing knowledge on NTDs. Additionally, we will also explore how incentive type and program design influence NTD-related service utilization and treatment outcomes in LMICs. Ethics and dissemination The systematic review protocol has been reviewed and approved by two independent institutional review boards (IRBs): icddr,b (PR-24112) in Bangladesh and Population Council Institute (IORG0011824) in India. The results will be submitted to a peer-reviewed journal and presented at national and international conferences to reach the scientific community. Systematic review registration The protocol has been registered in PROSPERO (CRD42024627804).
Full text 50,562 characters · extracted from preprint-html · click to expand
Effects of cash transfer and incentive programs on service utilization and treatment outcomes related to neglected tropical diseases and their impact on health and nutrition in low and middle-income countries: a protocol for a systematic review | medRxiv /* */ /* */ <!-- <!-- /*! * yepnope1.5.4 * (c) WTFPL, GPLv2 */ (function(a,b,c){function d(a){return"[object Function]"==o.call(a)}function e(a){return"string"==typeof a}function f(){}function g(a){return!a||"loaded"==a||"complete"==a||"uninitialized"==a}function h(){var a=p.shift();q=1,a?a.t?m(function(){("c"==a.t?B.injectCss:B.injectJs)(a.s,0,a.a,a.x,a.e,1)},0):(a(),h()):q=0}function i(a,c,d,e,f,i,j){function k(b){if(!o&&g(l.readyState)&&(u.r=o=1,!q&&h(),l.onload=l.onreadystatechange=null,b)){"img"!=a&&m(function(){t.removeChild(l)},50);for(var d in y[c])y[c].hasOwnProperty(d)&&y[c][d].onload()}}var j=j||B.errorTimeout,l=b.createElement(a),o=0,r=0,u={t:d,s:c,e:f,a:i,x:j};1===y[c]&&(r=1,y[c]=[]),"object"==a?l.data=c:(l.src=c,l.type=a),l.width=l.height="0",l.onerror=l.onload=l.onreadystatechange=function(){k.call(this,r)},p.splice(e,0,u),"img"!=a&&(r||2===y[c]?(t.insertBefore(l,s?null:n),m(k,j)):y[c].push(l))}function j(a,b,c,d,f){return q=0,b=b||"j",e(a)?i("c"==b?v:u,a,b,this.i++,c,d,f):(p.splice(this.i++,0,a),1==p.length&&h()),this}function k(){var a=B;return a.loader={load:j,i:0},a}var l=b.documentElement,m=a.setTimeout,n=b.getElementsByTagName("script")[0],o={}.toString,p=[],q=0,r="MozAppearance"in l.style,s=r&&!!b.createRange().compareNode,t=s?l:n.parentNode,l=a.opera&&"[object Opera]"==o.call(a.opera),l=!!b.attachEvent&&!l,u=r?"object":l?"script":"img",v=l?"script":u,w=Array.isArray||function(a){return"[object Array]"==o.call(a)},x=[],y={},z={timeout:function(a,b){return b.length&&(a.timeout=b[0]),a}},A,B;B=function(a){function b(a){var a=a.split("!"),b=x.length,c=a.pop(),d=a.length,c={url:c,origUrl:c,prefixes:a},e,f,g;for(f=0;f<d;f++)g=a[f].split("="),(e=z[g.shift()])&&(c=e(c,g));for(f=0;f<b;f++)c=x[f](c);return c}function g(a,e,f,g,h){var i=b(a),j=i.autoCallback;i.url.split(".").pop().split("?").shift(),i.bypass||(e&&(e=d(e)?e:e[a]||e[g]||e[a.split("/").pop().split("?")[0]]),i.instead?i.instead(a,e,f,g,h):(y[i.url]?i.noexec=!0:y[i.url]=1,f.load(i.url,i.forceCSS||!i.forceJS&&"css"==i.url.split(".").pop().split("?").shift()?"c":c,i.noexec,i.attrs,i.timeout),(d(e)||d(j))&&f.load(function(){k(),e&&e(i.origUrl,h,g),j&&j(i.origUrl,h,g),y[i.url]=2})))}function h(a,b){function c(a,c){if(a){if(e(a))c||(j=function(){var a=[].slice.call(arguments);k.apply(this,a),l()}),g(a,j,b,0,h);else if(Object(a)===a)for(n in m=function(){var b=0,c;for(c in a)a.hasOwnProperty(c)&&b++;return b}(),a)a.hasOwnProperty(n)&&(!c&&!--m&&(d(j)?j=function(){var a=[].slice.call(arguments);k.apply(this,a),l()}:j[n]=function(a){return function(){var b=[].slice.call(arguments);a&&a.apply(this,b),l()}}(k[n])),g(a[n],j,b,n,h))}else!c&&l()}var h=!!a.test,i=a.load||a.both,j=a.callback||f,k=j,l=a.complete||f,m,n;c(h?a.yep:a.nope,!!i),i&&c(i)}var i,j,l=this.yepnope.loader;if(e(a))g(a,0,l,0);else if(w(a))for(i=0;i (function(w,d,s,l,i){w[l]=w[l]||[];w[l].push({'gtm.start':new Date().getTime(),event:'gtm.js'});var f=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0];var j=d.createElement(s);var dl=l!='dataLayer'?'&l='+l:'';j.src='//www.googletagmanager.com/gtm.js?id='+i+dl;j.type='text/javascript';j.async=true;f.parentNode.insertBefore(j,f);})(window,document,'script','dataLayer','GTM-P4HH5NV'); Skip to main content Home About Submit ALERTS / RSS Search for this keyword Advanced Search Effects of cash transfer and incentive programs on service utilization and treatment outcomes related to neglected tropical diseases and their impact on health and nutrition in low and middle-income countries: a protocol for a systematic review View ORCID Profile S. M. Tafsir Hasan , Radhika Dayal , Amena Al Nishan , Sunetra Ghatak , Puja Chakraborty , Sudeshna Maitra , Sumaiya Tasneem Raisa , Nizamuddin Khan , Dinesh Mondal , Tahmeed Ahmed , Avishek Hazra doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.03.18.25324206 S. M. Tafsir Hasan 1 Nutrition Research Division, International Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research , Bangladesh (icddr,b), Dhaka 1212, Bangladesh Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site ORCID record for S. M. Tafsir Hasan For correspondence: tafsir.hasan{at}icddrb.org Radhika Dayal 2 PopulationCouncil Consulting Private Limited , Noida, Uttar Pradesh 201301, India Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site Amena Al Nishan 1 Nutrition Research Division, International Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research , Bangladesh (icddr,b), Dhaka 1212, Bangladesh Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site Sunetra Ghatak 2 PopulationCouncil Consulting Private Limited , Noida, Uttar Pradesh 201301, India 3 O. P. Jindal Global University , Sonipat, Haryana 131001, India Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site Puja Chakraborty 1 Nutrition Research Division, International Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research , Bangladesh (icddr,b), Dhaka 1212, Bangladesh Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site Sudeshna Maitra 2 PopulationCouncil Consulting Private Limited , Noida, Uttar Pradesh 201301, India Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site Sumaiya Tasneem Raisa 1 Nutrition Research Division, International Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research , Bangladesh (icddr,b), Dhaka 1212, Bangladesh Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site Nizamuddin Khan 2 PopulationCouncil Consulting Private Limited , Noida, Uttar Pradesh 201301, India Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site Dinesh Mondal 1 Nutrition Research Division, International Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research , Bangladesh (icddr,b), Dhaka 1212, Bangladesh Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site Tahmeed Ahmed 1 Nutrition Research Division, International Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research , Bangladesh (icddr,b), Dhaka 1212, Bangladesh 4 Office of Executive Director, International Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research , Bangladesh , (icddr,b), Dhaka 1212, Bangladesh Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site Avishek Hazra 2 PopulationCouncil Consulting Private Limited , Noida, Uttar Pradesh 201301, India Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site Abstract Full Text Info/History Metrics Data/Code Preview PDF ABSTRACT Background Although there has been a general decrease in the global burden on Neglected tropical diseases (NTDs), progress is not on track to meet the Sustainable Development Goals 2030. Evidence suggests the positive effect of conditional cash transfer programs on controlling NTDs. However, it is to be evaluated whether other financial incentive programs exert similar effects on NTD-related service utilization and treatment outcomes and, in turn, on health and nutrition in low and middle-income countries (LMICs). This proposed systematic review aims to evaluate the effects of cash transfer and incentive programs on NTD-related service utilization and treatment outcomes in LMICs, to examine how covariates, program design, implementation plan, and incentive program design influence these outcomes, and to examine how NTD-related these outcomes influence nutritional status and health in LMICs. Methods This systematic review will follow the PICOS (Population, Interventions, Comparators, Outcomes, Studies) framework. The population of this review will be restricted to the adult population and children of all ages of LMICs. For intervention selection, we will include any program or policies addressing socioeconomic disadvantage through the provision of cash transfers or incentive programs, including but not limited to in-kind transfers, food vouchers, free medicine vouchers, discount coupons, and micro-credit to households or individuals. Eligible comparators will be the population who did not receive any intervention, recipients of interventions from before the intervention, and populations or areas exposed to different levels of intervention coverage. The primary outcomes of interest will be service utilization and treatment outcomes related to any of the 21 NTDs and disease groups prioritized by WHO. Secondary outcomes include variables related to general health and nutrition outcomes. Discussion To provide a comprehensive and unbiased assessment of the current state of knowledge on the effects of cash transfer and other financial incentive programs on NTD-related service utilization and treatment outcomes in LMICs, conducting a systematic review is crucial. This systematic review will provide comprehensive, and unbiased evidence considering the strengths and limitations of existing knowledge on NTDs. Additionally, we will also explore how incentive type and program design influence NTD-related service utilization and treatment outcomes in LMICs. Ethics and dissemination The systematic review protocol has been reviewed and approved by two independent institutional review boards (IRBs): icddr,b (PR-24112) in Bangladesh and Population Council Institute (IORG0011824) in India. The results will be submitted to a peer-reviewed journal and presented at national and international conferences to reach the scientific community. Systematic review registration The protocol has been registered in PROSPERO (CRD42024627804). INTRODUCTION Neglected Tropical Diseases (NTDs) remain a major global public health concern, affecting an estimated 1.62 billion people in tropical and subtropical climatic zones ( 1 , 2 ) and accounting for approximately 200,000 deaths and 14.5 million disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) annually ( 2 , 3 ). Although there has been a general decline in the global burden of NTDs ( 2 ), the progress is not yet on track to meet the ambitious Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) 2030 target of a 90 percent reduction in the number of people requiring interventions for NTDs ( 3 ). NTDs continue to pose a big challenge for low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) due to their intricate links with poverty, inadequate hygiene, poor sanitation, and limited healthcare access ( 4 , 5 ). Poverty is a key factor exacerbating the burden of NTDs in LMICs. Financial deprivation and disease are closely intertwined, which influence the social and environmental determinants of NTDs, including water, sanitation, and hygiene (WASH), education, housing, and healthcare accessibility ( 5 – 7 ). Poverty highly modulates the accessibility and utilization of the services related to the five important NTD control strategies recommended by the World Health Organization (WHO): innovative and intensified disease management, preventive chemotherapy, vector control, veterinary public health measures, and provision of safe WASH practices ( 8 , 9 ). NTDs disproportionately affect impoverished and marginalized communities, resulting in increased catastrophic health spending (CHS) and out-of-pocket (OOP) expenses ( 10 ). Already living in poverty before the onset of these diseases, affected households often face deeper financial hardship as rising OOP costs push them further below the poverty line ( 11 – 13 ). To manage these expenses, they often resort to coping strategies such as borrowing money or selling assets, which further exacerbates their poverty. This cycle undermines access to healthcare services and negatively affects treatment outcomes ( 13 ). Physical disabilities due to NTDs, such as blindness, lesions, and swelling, may also contribute to decreased income ability ( 14 ). This financial burden perpetuates a cycle of poverty and NTD burden, hindering service uptakes and treatments ( 15 ). Consequently, the detrimental effects of NTDs are amplified, including poor NTD-related service utilization and adherence, treatment failure, disability, and deterioration of general health and well-being ( 15 ). Moreover, infection with NTDs increases the nutritional burden of the hosts and impedes overall health. NTDs have been reported to be associated with stunting, anemia, iron deficiency, micronutrient deficiencies, and malnutrition ( 16 – 19 ). Simultaneously, nutrient deficiency may also increase the susceptibility and vulnerability of NTD-affected individuals and lead to NTD treatment failure ( 18 , 20 , 21 ). Actions taken to control NTDs may eventually improve nutritional outcomes which, in turn, will also influence overall health and wellbeing, particularly in resource-limited settings. Despite various programs and policies implementing innovative strategies to improve NTD campaign coverage, multiple layers of poverty-associated and financial obstacles continue to hinder appropriate health-seeking behaviors in affected populations. These barriers include attending screening clinics, receiving adequate care, and treatment adherence ( 22 – 25 ). Cash transfer programs have demonstrated potential for improving NTD outcomes ( 26 – 29 ). These programs aim to provide small-scale monetary assistance to individuals or households to break the intergenerational cycle of poverty. Conditional cash transfers (CCT) impart benefits through a two-way strategy: direct cash assistance and enforced conditionalities ( 30 ). It is also possible that conditionalities related to the control of NTDs may also impart positive effects on nutrition and overall health outcomes in LMICs. Large-scale, national-level cash transfer programs in Latin America have not only proven effective in improving social protection, economic stability, and sustained developmental outcomes ( 31 ) but have also generated interest in using cash transfers to target context-specific health outcomes, including NTD treatment outcomes, maternal health, child health, cognitive development, nutrition, and healthcare utilization ( 26 , 32 – 34 ). A recent systematic review highlighted the positive impact of conditional cash transfer programs in controlling NTDs. It indicated that the targeted benefits of these programs for vulnerable populations can help reduce health inequalities associated with NTDs. For example, cash transfers have been shown to reduce leprosy incidence and increase the uptake of deworming treatments in certain contexts ( 35 ). However, the review had a major limitation in that it included and synthesized evidence for only 3 of the 21 neglected tropical diseases and disease groups prioritized by WHO ( 2 , 3 , 35 ). While other incentive programs, such as, in-kind transfers, micro-credits, vouchers for transport, medicines, or food, have shown the potential to promote health knowledge, reduce health inequalities, and improve health-seeking behaviors, their direct or indirect effects on NTD-related indicators have not been comprehensively studied in LMICs ( 36 , 37 ). Given this context, there is a need for an evidence synthesis on the effects of cash transfers and other incentive programs on NTD-related service utilization and treatment outcomes in LMICs. This proposed systematic review and meta-analysis (depending on information availability), will conduct a comprehensive synthesis and unbiased assessment of the existing studies in this area, critically assessing the strengths and limitations of existing evidence. Objectives The systematic review aims to answer the following three questions: 1) What are the effects of cash transfer and incentive programs on NTD-related service utilization and treatment outcomes in LMICs? 2) How do program design, implementation plan, and other covariates such as incentive program design (type, amount, and frequency) influence NTD-related service utilization and treatment outcomes in LMICs? 3) How do NTD-related service utilization and treatment outcomes influence nutritional status, overall health, and well-being in LMICs? METHODS This protocol was developed in accordance with the guidelines of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses for Protocols (PRISMA-P) ( 38 ). A PRISMA-P checklist for this protocol is provided in Supplemental File 1. The protocol has been registered in PROSPERO (CRD42024627804). Eligibility criteria The eligibility criteria for studies to be included in this review are adapted based on the PICOS framework (Population, Interventions, Comparators, Outcomes, Study Designs) ( 39 ), as described below. Population The population of interest in this review will be adults and children of all ages residing in LMICs. Interventions For intervention, this review will include programs or policies addressing socioeconomic disadvantages through the provision of cash transfers or financial incentive programs, including but not limited to in-kind transfers, food vouchers, free medicine vouchers, discount coupons, and micro-credit to households or individuals. CCT programs require beneficiaries to comply with certain conditionalities (e.g., regular health check-ups) ( 40 ), while unconditional cash transfer programs do not set such requirements ( 41 ). Microcredit is the extension of very small loans (microloans) to impoverished borrowers who typically lack collateral, steady employment, and a verifiable credit history ( 42 ). It is designed to support entrepreneurship and alleviate poverty ( 42 ). An in-kind transfer is a transfer of goods or services rather than cash ( 43 ). Other incentive programs may also include giving free medicine vouchers, food vouchers, discount coupons, social protection, social programs, scholarship programs, family allowances, and micro-finance. Comparators This review will include studies with suitable comparators; studies without comparators will be excluded. Comparators will include individuals or households who did not receive any cash transfers or incentive programs, recipients of cash transfers or incentive programs from pre-intervention period, and populations or areas with varying levels of intervention coverage. Outcomes The primary outcomes of interest will be service utilization and treatment outcomes related to any of the 21 NTDs and disease groups prioritized by WHO ( 2 ). These include Buruli ulcer; Chagas disease; dengue and chikungunya; dracunculiasis; echinococcosis; foodborne trematodiases; human African trypanosomiasis; leishmaniasis; leprosy; lymphatic filariasis; mycetoma, chromoblastomycosis and other deep mycoses; noma; onchocerciasis; rabies; scabies and other ectoparasitoses; schistosomiasis; soil-transmitted helminthiases; snakebite envenoming; taeniasis/cysticercosis; trachoma; and yaws. Service utilization related to WHO-recommended core strategic interventions for each of the 21 NTDs and disease groups will be evaluated. The aspects of service utilization evaluated will include, but not be limited to, health-seeking behavior, attendance at screening clinics, treatment adherence, and NTD campaign coverage. A comprehensive list of core strategic interventions and treatment outcomes for each of the 21 NTDs and disease groups is provided in Table 1 ( 1 , 3 , 44 – 49 ). View this table: View inline View popup Table 1. List of core strategic interventions and treatment outcomes for each of the 21 NTDs and disease groups The review will include only studies reporting primary outcomes. However, in the included studies, secondary or exploratory outcomes related to the nutrition, health, and well-being of adults and children will be analyzed to assess how NTD-related service utilization and treatment outcomes influence these outcomes in LMICs. For each of the 21 NTDs prioritized by WHO, the following framework will be examined to quantify the effect sizes: incentive programs → increased service utilization and improved treatment outcomes → improved nutritional status and health and well-being . Exploratory outcomes will include, but not be limited to, nutritional status, various types of malnutrition, micro- and macronutrient deficiency, anemia, cognitive development, school attendance and performance, mortality, and morbidity. Study designs The review will include randomized controlled trials (RCTs), as well as non-randomized studies with comparator groups, such as cohort, case-control, longitudinal, cross-sectional, ecological, and quasi-experimental studies. Additionally, impact evaluation results, program reports, qualitative studies, and studies employing methodologies like difference-in-difference, pre-post design, interrupted time series, regression discontinuity, instrumental variable estimation, and propensity score matching will be considered. Studies reported in English language will be considered for inclusion. Search strategy A scoping search will be conducted to identify key Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) terms and other relevant search terms, which will then be combined to develop a comprehensive search strategy. Boolean operators (AND, OR, and NOT), use truncation/stemming (*), and phrase searching (“”) will be employed. The search will focus on NTDs, using genus names along with key terms, such as cash transfer, unconditional cash transfer, conditional cash transfer, micro-credit, food voucher, and incentive. A detailed preliminary search strategy is provided in Table 2 . View this table: View inline View popup Table 2. Preliminary search strategy Article screening process The following databases will be searched: Medline, PubMed, Scopus, EMBASE, Web of Science, POPLINE, Google Scholar, Cochrane Collection, PsycINFO, Global Health, EconLit, Social Sciences Citation Index, International Bibliography of the Social Sciences, Knowledge Commons of Population Council, and 3ie database. Grey literature databases, including WHO websites, AlignMNH, World Bank, and UNICEF websites, will also be searched for relevant reports. Websites and online resources of universities and research centers in LMICs will be reviewed to identify working papers, dissertations and theses. Reference lists or bibliographies of included studies will also be hand-searched to include any additional relevant studies. For those studies not available in the public domain, a librarian will be contacted. Studies in English, published or available from 2000 to 2024, will be included. A search log will be maintained throughout the search process to document the database platforms or search interface used, the date the search was conducted, the search strings used, and the number of records/counts identified. The log will be updated as necessary to ensure transparency, robustness, and ease of updating during the study period. Preliminary search documents will be stored in reference management software (EndNote/Mendeley). All the screened studies will be transferred into Microsoft Excel or Rayyan tool, a systematic review management platform ( https://new.rayyan.ai/ ). Title, abstract and full-text relevancy Two reviewers will independently screen studies based on titles and abstracts. During the initial screening phase, decisions made by each reviewer will be blinded. After the initial screening is done, the studies screened by the two reviewers will be compared and checked for discrepancies. Any discrepancies in the categorization will be resolved through consultation between the reviewers or with another reviewer. A second-level judicial review will then be conducted by a separate reviewer to perform quality checks on studies with discrepancies and those deemed ineligible. Studies deemed relevant based on titles and abstracts will undergo full-text screening for relevancy, following the same procedures used during the title and abstract screening phase. Reasons for the exclusion of papers will be recorded. The studies will be equally divided among the reviewers for relevancy screening. Data will be extracted individually by each reviewer. Any questions arising during the process will be addressed through consultation among the reviewers to reach a consensus. Eligible studies from the full-text review will be entered directly into a master data extraction spreadsheet. Figure 1 illustrates the screening process based on the PRISMA flow diagram ( 50 ). Download figure Open in new tab Figure 1. Step-by-step article screening process Data extraction After the article screening process is completed, all eligible studies will be extracted into a master data extraction spreadsheet. The data extraction sheet will include the following categories: title, author(s), date of publication, type of publication (e.g., summary, synthesis, single study), number and type of included studies (if a summary or synthesis), settings and population studied, interventions implemented, outcomes measured and results, and if relevant, whether results differed among subgroups, such as gender, socioeconomic status, or ethnicity. For studies with multiple outcomes or variables, all eligible outcomes will be extracted. The data extraction form will be pilot-tested and refined based on the information extracted from a few initial studies meeting the inclusion criteria. This process will help minimize bias and improve the validity and reliability of the systematic review. Authors will be contacted through email if key information is missing or if further information or clarification is required. Risk of bias assessment for individual studies The quality assessment will be done by using the Revised Cochrane Risk of Bias for randomized trials (RoB 2) ( 51 ), the Risk of Bias in Non-randomized Studies of Interventions (ROBINS-I) ( 52 ), and an adapted version of the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP) ( 53 ) for qualitative studies. The quality of each included study will be independently assessed by one reviewer, with the assessment results checked by a second reviewer. Any discrepancies or disagreements will be resolved through consultation with a third reviewer to reach a consensus. Anticipated number of studies to be included in the review Based on the initial search to develop the protocol, about 20-30 studies are anticipated to be included in the review ( 34 , 54 , 55 ). This number might change during the actual work of the systematic review based on the search using electronic databases and grey literature. Data synthesis A narrative synthesis will be produced by describing the studies. A geographical information system (GIS) map will be generated to show the frequency distribution of impact evaluations of cash transfer and incentive programs on NTD-related service utilization, treatment outcomes, nutritional status, and health and wellbeing. Interventions of cash transfers and incentive programs will be classified into different categories for different types of NTDs and their effects will be synthesized for ( 1 ) NTD-related service utilization; ( 2 ) treatment outcomes; and ( 3 ) nutritional status, and health and well-being outcomes. All the studies will be tabulated by quantitative and qualitative type and key findings will be described. Primary and secondary outcomes will be listed along with differences in effectiveness between different cash transfer and incentive programs for NTD control. The possibility of performing a meta-analysis will be explored depending on the availability of sufficient relevant studies. The ability to undertake a meta-analysis will depend on the heterogeneity of the measures, such as similarities or differences in population, intervention, outcomes, and methodologies used. If a meta-analysis is appropriate, the statistical heterogeneity of effects will be assessed using chi-square and I-square statistics. Efforts will be made to analyze the factors explaining heterogeneity through moderation analysis, including sub-group meta-analysis. For qualitative studies, the themes will be identified using a deductive approach and the findings will be used to interpret/complement the quantitative findings as part of the narrative synthesis. The synthesis will present the factors such as program design, implementation, context, and challenges that influence the impact of cash transfer or incentive programs on NTD-related service utilization, treatment outcomes, nutrition status, and health and wellbeing. Absolute evidence gaps and synthesis gaps will also be identified that can inform the development of new studies or programs. Analysis of subgroups or subsets The possibility of performing sub-group analyses will be explored. It will, however, depend on the evidence strength to summarize effects in special populations such as pregnant women, and geriatric populations, or to distinguish effect differences across different levels of groups, such as female/male, child/adolescent/adult, different geographical regions, malnourished/well-nourished, and type of disease agents (viruses, bacteria, protozoa, fungi, helminths, ectoparasites, snakebites). The effects will also be examined to determine how they differ for different covariates, program design, implementation plan, and incentive program design (type, amount, and frequency). Ethics and dissemination The systematic review protocol has been reviewed and approved by two independent institutional review boards (IRBs): icddr,b (PR-24112) in Bangladesh and Population Council Institute (IORG0011824) in India. The findings of this systematic review will be presented at national and international conferences and reported in a peer-reviewed journal in accordance with the PRISMA 2020 guideline for reporting systematic reviews ( 50 ). Any amendments to this protocol during the review process will be documented in PROSPERO and reported in the final manuscript. Status and timeline of the study Current status: Systematic review protocol approved by institutional review boards Anticipated start date of the systematic review work: 1 July 2025 Anticipated title and abstract screening completion: 30 September 2025 Anticipated full-text screening completion: 31 December 2025 Anticipated data extraction completion: 31 January 2026 Anticipated first draft of the systematic review result paper: 31 March 2026 DISCUSSION This systematic review will be performed to critically examine and provide a comprehensive assessment of the effects of cash transfer and other financial incentive programs on NTD-related service utilization and treatment outcomes in LMICs. The economic impact of different categories of financial aid to mitigate NTDs will be assessed, which could inform policymakers on the cost-effectiveness of implementing timely intervention and other prevention or treatment efforts. Additionally, the potential link between NTD-related service utilization and health and nutrition outcomes in LMICs will be evaluated. A methodological assessment of the published literature will also be performed and the findings from the published works will be compared with those of other similar reviews. The findings from this systematic review will be compared and/or contrasted with similar published papers and the strength of evidence will be examined. Conclusions will be drawn from this systematic review highlighting the effects of several financial incentive programs on service utilization and treatment outcomes related to NTDs as well as their overall impact on health and nutrition in LMICs. Limitations of the review will be discussed in detail. The public health implications of all the findings of this systematic review will also be comprehensively discussed. CONCLUSION The proposed systematic review will synthesize evidence generated by studies over a span of 25 years, critically assess the strengths and limitations of existing studies on NTDs, and evaluate the possible link between cash transfer and financial incentive programs with NTD. Rigorous methodology and robust article screening process have the potential to ensure a comprehensive, up-to-date, and unbiased evidence synthesis of the effectiveness of cash transfer and incentive programs on service utilization and treatment outcomes related to NTDs and their impact on health and nutrition in LMICs Data Availability No datasets were generated or analysed during the current study. All relevant data from this study will be made available upon study completion. Funding This study has been funded by the Children’s Investment Fund Foundation (CIFF). Disclaimer CIFF was not involved in the design of the study, data collection and analysis, decisions regarding publication, or the preparation of the manuscript. Competing interests The authors declare that they have no competing interests. CONTRIBUTORS/ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS SMTH, RD, AAN, and AH initiated the protocol and conceptualized the research plan for the proposed systematic review. SMTH, RD, AAN, and SM finalized the methodology. SMTH, RD, AAN, SG, and PC wrote the manuscript. AH, SM, STR, NK, DM, and TA critically reviewed it for important intellectual content. All authors read and approved of the final manuscript. SUPPORTING INFORMATION A PRISMA-P checklist for this protocol is provided in Supplemental File 1. Footnotes ↵ + Co-senior authors Abbreviations CASP Critical Appraisal Skills Programme CCT Conditional Cash Transfer LMICs Low-and-Middle Income Countries NTD Neglected Tropical Disease WHO World Health Organization REFERENCES 1. ↵ Hudu SA , Jimoh AO , Adeshina KA , Otalike EG , Tahir A , Hegazy AA. An Insight into the Success, Challenges, and Future Perspectives of Eliminating Neglected Tropical Disease . Scientific African. 2024 : e02165 . 2. ↵ World Health Organization . Global report on neglected tropical diseases 2024: World Health Organization ; 2024 05 May 2024. 3. ↵ World Health Organization . Ending the neglect to attain the Sustainable Development Goals: a road map for neglected tropical diseases 2021–2030 : World Health Organization ; 2020 . 4. ↵ Engels D , Zhou XN . Neglected tropical diseases: an effective global response to local poverty-related disease priorities . Infect Dis Poverty . 2020 ; 9 ( 1 ): 10 . OpenUrl PubMed 5. ↵ Hotez PJ , Fenwick A , Savioli L , Molyneux DH . Rescuing the bottom billion through control of neglected tropical diseases . The Lancet . 2009 ; 373 ( 9674 ): 1570 – 5 . OpenUrl 6. Institute of Medicine (US) Forum on Microbial Threats . The Causes and Impacts of Neglected Tropical and Zoonotic Diseases: Opportunities for Integrated Intervention Strategies . Washington (DC) : National Academies Press (US) ; 2011 . Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK62507/ doi: 10.17226/13087 . OpenUrl CrossRef 7. ↵ Coady . D. Alleviating structural poverty in developing countries: the approach of PROGRESA in Mexico : Alleviating structural poverty in developing countries: the approach of PROGRESA in Mexico (English) . . Washington, DC : World Bank Group http://documentsworldbankorg/curated/en/435991468757217796/Alleviating-structural-poverty-in-developing-countries-the-approach-of-PROGRESA-in-Mexico . 8. ↵ World Health Organization . Integrating neglected tropical diseases into global health and development: fourth WHO report on neglected tropical diseases : World Health Organization ; 2017 . 9. ↵ Fürst T , Salari P , Llamas LM , Steinmann P , Fitzpatrick C , Tediosi F . Global health policy and neglected tropical diseases: Then, now, and in the years to come . PLoS Negl Trop Dis . 2017 ; 11 ( 9 ): e0005759 . OpenUrl PubMed 10. ↵ Patikorn C , Cho J-Y , Higashi J , Huang XX , Chaiyakunapruk N . Financial hardship among patients suffering from neglected tropical diseases: A systematic review and meta-analysis of global literature . PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases . 2024 ; 18 ( 5 ): e0012086 . OpenUrl 11. ↵ Wagstaff A. Measuring financial protection in health : World Bank Publications ; 2008 . 12. Nguyen HA , Ahmed S , Turner HC . Overview of the main methods used for estimating catastrophic health expenditure . Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation . 2023 ; 21 ( 1 ): 50 . OpenUrl 13. ↵ Adhikari SR , Maskay NM , Sharma BP . Paying for hospital-based care of Kala-azar in Nepal: assessing catastrophic, impoverishment and economic consequences . Health policy and planning . 2009 ; 24 ( 2 ): 129 – 39 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 14. ↵ Immurana M , Kisseih KG , Abdullahi I , Azuug M , Manyeh AK , Mohammed A , et al. The effects of selected neglected tropical diseases on economic performance at the macrolevel in Africa . BMC Infectious Diseases . 2024 ; 24 ( 1 ): 462 . OpenUrl PubMed 15. ↵ Magalhães AR , Codeço CT , Svenning J-C , Escobar LE , Van de Vuurst P , Gonçalves-Souza T . Neglected tropical diseases risk correlates with poverty and early ecosystem destruction . Infectious Diseases of Poverty . 2023 ; 12 ( 1 ): 32 . OpenUrl PubMed 16. ↵ Tickell KD , Walson JL . Nutritional enteric failure: neglected tropical diseases and childhood stunting. Public Library of Science San Francisco , CA USA ; 2016 . p. e0004523 . 17. Ngui R , Lim YAL , Chong Kin L , Sek Chuen C , Jaffar S . Association between anaemia, iron deficiency anaemia, neglected parasitic infections and socioeconomic factors in rural children of West Malaysia . PLoS neglected tropical diseases . 2012 ; 6 ( 3 ): e1550 . OpenUrl PubMed 18. ↵ Hall A , Zhang Y , MacArthur C , Baker S . The role of nutrition in integrated programs to control neglected tropical diseases . BMC medicine . 2012 ; 10 : 1 – 10 . OpenUrl PubMed 19. ↵ Quihui-Cota L , Valencia ME , Crompton DWT , Phillips S , Hagan P , Diaz-Camacho SP , et al. Prevalence and intensity of intestinal parasitic infections in relation to nutritional status in Mexican schoolchildren . Transactions of The Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene . 2004 ; 98 ( 11 ): 653 – 9 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 20. ↵ Pereira P . Interaction between infection, nutrition and immunity in tropical medicine . Journal of Venomous Animals and Toxins including Tropical Diseases . 2003 ; 9 ( 2 ): 163 – 73 . OpenUrl 21. ↵ Yap P , Utzinger J , Hattendorf J , Steinmann P . Influence of nutrition on infection and re-infection with soil-transmitted helminths: a systematic review . Parasites & Vectors . 2014 ; 7 ( 1 ): 229 . OpenUrl PubMed 22. ↵ Anyolitho MK , Nyakato VN , Huyse T , Poels K , Masquillier C . Health-seeking behaviour regarding schistosomiasis treatment in the absence of a mass drug administration (MDA) program: the case of endemic communities along Lake Albert in Western Uganda . BMC Public Health . 2023 ; 23 ( 1 ): 1072 . OpenUrl PubMed 23. Ackley C , Elsheikh M , Zaman S . Scoping review of Neglected Tropical Disease Interventions and Health Promotion: A framework for successful NTD interventions as evidenced by the literature . PLoS Negl Trop Dis . 2021 ; 15 ( 7 ): e0009278 . OpenUrl PubMed 24. Johnston EA , Teague J , Graham JP . Challenges and opportunities associated with neglected tropical disease and water, sanitation and hygiene intersectoral integration programs . BMC Public Health . 2015 ; 15 : 547 . 25. ↵ Aamar H , Siddiqui JA , Siddiqui A , Essar MY . Neglected tropical diseases in Pakistan: challenges, efforts, and recommendations . International Journal of Surgery . 2023 ; 109 ( 2 ): 143 – 4 . OpenUrl PubMed 26. ↵ Engels D , Elphick-Pooley T . The potential of conditional cash transfers for the control of neglected tropical diseases . The Lancet Global Health . 2022 ; 10 ( 5 ): e588 – e9 . OpenUrl 27. Ramos AN , Heukelbach J , Oliveira MLW-D-R . A conditional cash transfer programme in Brazil improves leprosy treatment outcomes . The Lancet Infectious Diseases . 2020 ; 20 ( 5 ): 522 – 3 . OpenUrl PubMed 28. Novignon J , Prencipe L , Molotsky A , Valli E , de Groot R , Adamba C , et al. The impact of unconditional cash transfers on morbidity and health-seeking behaviour in Africa: evidence from Ghana, Malawi, Zambia and Zimbabwe . Health Policy and Planning . 2022 ; 37 ( 5 ): 607 – 23 . OpenUrl PubMed 29. ↵ Evans DK , Holtemeyer B , Kosec K . Cash transfers and health: evidence from Tanzania . The World Bank Economic Review . 2019 ; 33 ( 2 ): 394 – 412 . OpenUrl 30. ↵ Gaarder MM , Glassman A , Todd JE . Conditional cash transfers and health: unpacking the causal chain . Journal of development effectiveness . 2010 ; 2 ( 1 ): 6 – 50 . OpenUrl CrossRef 31. ↵ Fiszbein A , Schady N , Ferreira F , Grosh M , Keleher N , Olinto P , et al. Conditional Cash Transfers : Reducing Present and Future Poverty : The World Bank Group ; 2009 . 32. ↵ Álvarez-Hernández DA , Rivero-Zambrano L , Martínez-Juárez LA , García-Rodríguez-Arana R . Overcoming the global burden of neglected tropical diseases . Ther Adv Infect Dis . 2020 ; 7 : 2049936120966449 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 33. Fernald LC , Gertler PJ , Neufeld LM . Role of cash in conditional cash transfer programmes for child health, growth, and development: an analysis of Mexico’s Oportunidades . Lancet . 2008 ; 371 ( 9615 ): 828 – 37 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Web of Science 34. ↵ Glassman A , Duran D , Fleisher L , Singer D , Sturke R , Angeles G , et al. Impact of Conditional Cash Transfers on Maternal and Newborn Health . J Health Popul Nutr . 2013 ; 31 ( 4 Suppl 2 ): S48 – 66 . OpenUrl 35. ↵ Ahmed A , Aune D , Vineis P , Pescarini JM , Millett C , Hone T . The effect of conditional cash transfers on the control of neglected tropical disease: a systematic review . The Lancet Global Health . 2022 ; 10 ( 5 ): e640 – e8 . OpenUrl PubMed 36. ↵ Hadi A . Promoting health knowledge through micro-credit programmes: experience of BRAC in Bangladesh . Health promotion international . 2001 ; 16 ( 3 ): 219 – 27 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Web of Science 37. ↵ McFadden A , Green JM , Williams V , McLeish J , McCormick F , Fox-Rushby J , et al. Can food vouchers improve nutrition and reduce health inequalities in low-income mothers and young children: a multi-method evaluation of the experiences of beneficiaries and practitioners of the Healthy Start programme in England . BMC public health . 2014 ; 14 : 1 – 13 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 38. ↵ Moher D , Shamseer L , Clarke M , Ghersi D , Liberati A , Petticrew M , et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement . Syst Rev . 2015 ; 4 ( 1 ): 1 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 39. ↵ Tacconelli E . Systematic reviews: CRD’s guidance for undertaking reviews in health care . The Lancet Infectious Diseases . 2010 ; 10 ( 4 ): 226 . OpenUrl CrossRef 40. ↵ Fiszbein A , Schady NR . Conditional cash transfers : reducing present and future poverty : World Bank Publications ; 2009 . 41. ↵ Baird S , Ferreira FH , Özler B , Woolcock M . Relative effectiveness of conditional and unconditional cash transfers for schooling outcomes in developing countries: a systematic review . Campbell systematic reviews . 2013 ; 9 ( 1 ): 1 – 124 . OpenUrl 42. ↵ Banerjee A , Karlan D , Zinman J . Six randomized evaluations of microcredit: Introduction and further steps . American Economic Journal: Applied Economics . 2015 ; 7 ( 1 ): 1 – 21 . OpenUrl 43. ↵ Cunha JM , De Giorgi G , Jayachandran S . The price effects of cash versus in-kind transfers . The Review of Economic Studies . 2019 ; 86 ( 1 ): 240 – 81 . OpenUrl 44. ↵ Hoefle-Bénard J , Salloch S . Mass drug administration for neglected tropical disease control and elimination: a systematic review of ethical reasons . BMJ Glob Health . 2024 ; 9 ( 3 ). 45. Mitra AK , Mawson AR . Neglected Tropical Diseases: Epidemiology and Global Burden . Trop Med Infect Dis . 2017 ; 2 ( 3 ). 46. World Health Organization . WHO to publish first official guidelines on leprosy diagnosis, treatment and prevention [Internet] . 2018 [cited 2024 29 July 2024]; Available from: https://www.who.int/news/item/28-06-2018-who-to-publish-first-official-guidelines-on-leprosy-diagnosis-treatment-and-prevention . 47. Sharma P , Mukherjee R , Talwar GP , Sarathchandra KG , Walia R , Parida SK , et al. Immunoprophylactic effects of the anti-leprosy Mw vaccine in household contacts of leprosy patients: clinical field trials with a follow up of 8-10 years . Lepr Rev . 2005 ; 76 ( 2 ): 127 – 43 . OpenUrl PubMed 48. Lwin K , Sundaresan T , Gyi MM , Bechelli LM , Tamondong C , Garbajosa PG , et al. BCG vaccination of children against leprosy: fourteen-year findings of the trial in Burma . Bull World Health Organ . 1985 ; 63 ( 6 ): 1069 – 78 . OpenUrl PubMed Web of Science 49. ↵ Macfarlane CL , Budhathoki SS , Johnson S , Richardson M , Garner P . Albendazole alone or in combination with microfilaricidal drugs for lymphatic filariasis . Cochrane Database Syst Rev . 2019 ; 1 ( 1 ): Cd003753 . OpenUrl PubMed 50. ↵ Page MJ , McKenzie JE , Bossuyt PM , Boutron I , Hoffmann TC , Mulrow CD , et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews . Systematic Reviews . 2021 ; 10 ( 1 ): 89 . OpenUrl PubMed 51. ↵ Sterne JAC , Savović J , Page MJ , Elbers RG , Blencowe NS , Boutron I , et al. RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials . Bmj . 2019 ; 366 : l4898 . 52. ↵ Sterne JA , Hernán MA , Reeves BC , Savović J , Berkman ND , Viswanathan M , et al. ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions . BMJ . 2016 ; 355 : i4919 . OpenUrl FREE Full Text 53. ↵ CASP C. CASP qualitative checklist . Critical Appraisal Skills Programme . 2018 . 54. ↵ Jacobs W , Downey LE . Impact of conditional cash transfer programmes on antenatal care service uptake in low and middle-income countries: a systematic review . BMJ Open . 2022 ; 12 ( 11 ): e064673 . OpenUrl PubMed 55. ↵ Hunter BM , Harrison S , Portela A , Bick D . The effects of cash transfers and vouchers on the use and quality of maternity care services: A systematic review . PLoS One . 2017 ; 12 ( 3 ): e0173068 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed View the discussion thread. Back to top Previous Next Posted March 21, 2025. Download PDF Data/Code Email Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv. NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article. Your Email * Your Name * Send To * Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas. You are going to email the following Effects of cash transfer and incentive programs on service utilization and treatment outcomes related to neglected tropical diseases and their impact on health and nutrition in low and middle-income countries: a protocol for a systematic review Message Subject (Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv Message Body (Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website. Your Personal Message CAPTCHA This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions. Share Effects of cash transfer and incentive programs on service utilization and treatment outcomes related to neglected tropical diseases and their impact on health and nutrition in low and middle-income countries: a protocol for a systematic review S. M. Tafsir Hasan , Radhika Dayal , Amena Al Nishan , Sunetra Ghatak , Puja Chakraborty , Sudeshna Maitra , Sumaiya Tasneem Raisa , Nizamuddin Khan , Dinesh Mondal , Tahmeed Ahmed , Avishek Hazra medRxiv 2025.03.18.25324206; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.03.18.25324206 Share This Article: Copy Citation Tools Effects of cash transfer and incentive programs on service utilization and treatment outcomes related to neglected tropical diseases and their impact on health and nutrition in low and middle-income countries: a protocol for a systematic review S. M. Tafsir Hasan , Radhika Dayal , Amena Al Nishan , Sunetra Ghatak , Puja Chakraborty , Sudeshna Maitra , Sumaiya Tasneem Raisa , Nizamuddin Khan , Dinesh Mondal , Tahmeed Ahmed , Avishek Hazra medRxiv 2025.03.18.25324206; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.03.18.25324206 Citation Manager Formats BibTeX Bookends EasyBib EndNote (tagged) EndNote 8 (xml) Medlars Mendeley Papers RefWorks Tagged Ref Manager RIS Zotero Tweet Widget Facebook Like Google Plus One Subject Area Public and Global Health Subject Areas All Articles Addiction Medicine (567) Allergy and Immunology (863) Anesthesia (296) Cardiovascular Medicine (4409) Dentistry and Oral Medicine (443) Dermatology (380) Emergency Medicine (606) Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (1505) Epidemiology (15203) Forensic Medicine (30) Gastroenterology (1119) Genetic and Genomic Medicine (6569) Geriatric Medicine (666) Health Economics (994) Health Informatics (4510) Health Policy (1365) Health Systems and Quality Improvement (1608) Hematology (537) HIV/AIDS (1263) Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (15902) Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (1103) Medical Education (619) Medical Ethics (144) Nephrology (665) Neurology (6572) Nursing (345) Nutrition (998) Obstetrics and Gynecology (1139) Occupational and Environmental Health (954) Oncology (3319) Ophthalmology (967) Orthopedics (369) Otolaryngology (420) Pain Medicine (435) Palliative Medicine (129) Pathology (662) Pediatrics (1688) Pharmacology and Therapeutics (691) Primary Care Research (710) Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (5421) Public and Global Health (9205) Radiology and Imaging (2190) Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (1367) Respiratory Medicine (1191) Rheumatology (593) Sexual and Reproductive Health (709) Sports Medicine (529) Surgery (709) Toxicology (99) Transplantation (288) Urology (265) (function(){function c(){var b=a.contentDocument||a.contentWindow.document;if(b){var d=b.createElement('script');d.innerHTML="window.__CF$cv$params={r:'9fe6de29188a09d6',t:'MTc3OTIzMzE5OQ=='};var a=document.createElement('script');a.src='/cdn-cgi/challenge-platform/scripts/jsd/main.js';document.getElementsByTagName('head')[0].appendChild(a);";b.getElementsByTagName('head')[0].appendChild(d)}}if(document.body){var a=document.createElement('iframe');a.height=1;a.width=1;a.style.position='absolute';a.style.top=0;a.style.left=0;a.style.border='none';a.style.visibility='hidden';document.body.appendChild(a);if('loading'!==document.readyState)c();else if(window.addEventListener)document.addEventListener('DOMContentLoaded',c);else{var e=document.onreadystatechange||function(){};document.onreadystatechange=function(b){e(b);'loading'!==document.readyState&&(document.onreadystatechange=e,c())}}}})();

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: preprint-html

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-05-22T02:00:06.705733+00:00
License: CC-BY-4.0