How the Type of Surgery and Adherence to the Clinical Pathway Correlate with Quality Control and Cost Control in Endometriosis Surgery
article
OA: gold
CC0
AI-generated summary
Surgery type correlates with quality and cost control in endometriosis procedures, but adherence to clinical pathways does not.
One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works
Abstract
Objective: This study examined the correlation of the type of surgery and adherence to the clinical pathway corresponding to the national guidelines in terms of quality and cost control.
Methods : Quantitative economic evaluation was conducted to assess the type of surgery and adherence to clinical pathways in terms of quality and cost control. The data were analyzed using the chi-square or Mann–Whitney test.
Results : Of the sample of 82 patients who had undergone laparoscopy or laparotomy, 54.9% had a laparoscopic procedure, while 45.1% had undergone laparotomy ; only 25.6% of the case procedures adhered to the clinical pathway. In general, it can be interpreted that, in a laparoscopy procedure, the potential risk that a mismatch will occur in quality control is up to 32 times that of a laparotomy procedure. Moreover, good adherence to the clinical pathway does not correlate with good cost control. Overall, of the 82 cases, only three (3.7%) showed a good fit for both quality control and cost control.
Conclusions : The type of surgery correlates with quality and cost control, whereas adherence to the clinical pathway does not correlate with either quality or cost control.
Keywords: Laparotomy, Laparoscopy, surgery, endometriosis, national health insurance
Abstrak
Tujuan: Studi ini menguji korelasi jenis operasi dan kepatuhan terhadap jalur klinis yang sesuai dengan pedoman nasional dalam hal kontrol kualitas dan biaya.
Metode: Evaluasi ekonomi kuantitatif dilakukan untuk menilai jenis operasi dan kepatuhan terhadap jalur klinis dalam hal kualitas dan pengendalian biaya. Data dianalisis menggunakan uji chi-square atau Mann-Whitney.
Hasil: Dari sampel 82 pasien yang pernah menjalani laparoskopi atau laparotomi, 54,9% menjalani prosedur laparoskopi, sedangkan 45,1% pernah menjalani laparotomi ; hanya 25,6% dari prosedur kasus yang mengikuti jalur klinis. Secara umum dapat diartikan bahwa, dalam prosedur laparoskopi, potensi risiko terjadinya ketidaksesuaian dalam kontrol kualitas adalah hingga 32 kali lipat dari prosedur laparotomi. Selain itu, kepatuhan yang baik terhadap jalur klinis tidak berkorelasi dengan pengendalian biaya yang baik. Secara keseluruhan, dari 82 kasus, hanya tiga (3,7%) yang menunjukkan kesesuaian yang baik untuk pengendalian kualitas dan pengendalian biaya.
Kesimpulan: Jenis pembedahan berkorelasi dengan kualitas dan pengendalian biaya, sedangkan kepatuhan terhadap jalur klinis tidak berkorelasi dengan kualitas atau pengendalian biaya.
Kata kunci: Laparotomi, Laparoskopi, pembedahan, endometriosis, jaminan kesehatan nasional
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Condition tags
Citation neighborhood
Papers in the corpus that this work cites (lower rings, blue) and that cite this one (upper rings, green). Dot size scales with the paper's in-corpus citation count — bigger dot = more influential within the endo/adeno field. Click a dot to open that paper. [ expand to 2 hops ] — adds papers reached through this work's immediate citers/citees. Heavier; up to 60 extra dots.
References (10)
- Endometriosis: a premenopausal disease? Age pattern in 42,079 patients with endometriosis via openalex
- Endometriosis: cost estimates and methodological perspective via openalex
- Health-related quality of life in women with endometriosis: a systematic review via openalex
- New evidence in endometriosis via openalex
- Treatment of endometriosis in different ethnic populations: a meta-analysis of two clinical trials via openalex
- doi:10.1093/jamia/ocy176 via openalex
- doi:10.22146/jkesvo.30333 via openalex
- W6612567677 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/j.jbi.2010.08.002 via openalex
- doi:10.1097/00019616-199605000-00015 via openalex
Source provenance
- openalex
- last seen: 2026-05-10T10:44:09.974337+00:00
License: CC0
· commercial use OK