Use of oral GnRH antagonists combined therapy in the management of symptomatic uterine fibroids
Oral GnRH antagonists combined with hormone therapy significantly reduce uterine fibroid bleeding and preserve bone density without a flare-up effect.
One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works
The paper reviews the rationale and evidence for using oral GnRH antagonists—elagolix, relugolix, and linzagolix—combined with hormone replacement therapy add-back to manage symptomatic uterine fibroids while aiming for uterine-sparing treatment. It describes how these antagonists rapidly bind the GnRH receptor to suppress LH/FSH without flare effects, and cites registration trial findings that once-daily combination therapy significantly reduces menstrual bleeding versus placebo and preserves bone mineral density for up to 104 weeks. The major caveat stated is that further long-term studies are needed to evaluate the overall impact of medical treatment for uterine fibroids. Relevance to endometriosis: the paper explicitly notes that oral GnRH antagonists are a new alternative for hormone-dependent gynecological diseases such as uterine fibroids or endometriosis, though its main focus is uterine fibroid management.
Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works
Abstract
Full text
1,291 characters
· extracted from
oa-doi-fallback
· click to expand
Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works
Condition tags
Citation neighborhood (no data yet)
We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.
References (26)
- W1720362365 via openalex
- W1969018878 via openalex
- W1971477067 via openalex
- W1988605646 via openalex
- W2021171884 via openalex
- W2035346924 via openalex
- W2044548776 via openalex
- W2122851499 via openalex
- W2264069562 via openalex
- W2409117511 via openalex
- W2419319345 via openalex
- W2513128177 via openalex
- W2765546885 via openalex
- W2765951622 via openalex
- W2791341836 via openalex
- W2807884883 via openalex
- W2894565696 via openalex
- W2912234269 via openalex
- W2942645174 via openalex
- W2981839680 via openalex
- W2997440549 via openalex
- W3093226256 via openalex
- W3129366643 via openalex
- W4281775934 via openalex
- W4295895755 via openalex
- W4308775200 via openalex
Source provenance
- europepmc
- last seen: 2026-06-18T06:15:08.409253+00:00
- openalex
- last seen: 2026-06-04T00:00:01.174412+00:00
- pubmed
- last seen: 2026-06-18T06:14:12.406981+00:00