Laparoscopic Optimal Excision of Deep Rectovaginal Endometriosis: Tips and Techniques

Cureus · 2025 · vol. 17(5) , pp. e84239 · doi:10.7759/cureus.84239 · PMID:40525018 · W4410423100
article OA: diamond CC0
AI-generated summary by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-08

This paper details surgical evaluation and laparoscopic techniques for complete excision of deep rectovaginal endometriosis, achieving symptomatic relief.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

AI-generated deep summary by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-09 · read from full text

This paper is a technical case report/review describing presurgical evaluation and laparoscopic operative techniques for excision of deep rectovaginal endometriosis, using a 31-year-old patient with dysmenorrhea, dyschezia, dyspareunia, and chronic pelvic pain after progesterone with no significant relief. The authors detail a multidisciplinary planning approach with transvaginal ultrasound and MRI to map disease affecting uterosacral ligaments, pouch of Douglas/parametrium, and a rectal muscularis lesion, and then outline stepwise surgical maneuvers including sigmoid mobilization for exposure, ureterolysis with attention to preserving peri-ureteral blood supply, ovarian suspension, pararectal/presacral avascular space dissection to protect the hypogastric nerve plexus, and discoid rectal resection with leak testing. They report complete excision and symptomatic improvement with uneventful postoperative follow-up, with histopathology confirming endometriosis and two-thirds rectal wall involvement without mucosal involvement. A major caveat is that the article provides technique guidance primarily from one detailed case (not comparative outcomes across patients), though it reiterates the need for specialized centers and systematic access to avascular spaces for safe surgery. This paper is centrally about endometriosis — specifically laparoscopic optimal excision techniques for deep rectovaginal endometriosis.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

Endometriosis is a chronic progressive disease spectrum characterized by the presence of tissue resembling functioning endometrial glands and stroma outside the uterine cavity. These ectopic implants have a propensity to bleed, initiating an inflammatory response. One of the most severe forms is deep rectovaginal endometriosis, which is the most challenging entity to treat. The diagnostic evaluation of these patients requires a transvaginal ultrasound and an MRI pelvis. Medical management may reduce the symptom severity but does not cure the disease. These patients often need surgical excision of the endometriosis to manage symptoms. We aim to describe the approach, principles, and detailed techniques of surgical removal of deep endometriosis. Complete excision of the deep rectovaginal endometriosis was achieved with symptomatic relief. This case illustrates our presurgical evaluation and operative techniques in detail, which are crucial in the optimal removal of endometriosis.
Full text 18,455 characters · extracted from oa-pdf · 6 sections · click to expand

Abstract

Endometriosis is a chronic progressive disease spectrum characterized by the presence of tissue resembling functioning endometrial glands and stroma outside the uterine cavity. These ectopic implants have a propensity to bleed, initiating an inflammatory response. One of the most severe forms is deep rectovaginal endometriosis, which is the most challenging entity to treat. The diagnostic evaluation of these patients requires a transvaginal ultrasound and an MRI pelvis. Medical management may reduce the symptom severity but does not cure the disease. These patients often need surgical excision of the endometriosis to manage symptoms. We aim to describe the approach, principles, and detailed techniques of surgical removal of deep endometriosis. Complete excision of the deep rectovaginal endometriosis was achieved with symptomatic relief. This case illustrates our presurgical evaluation and operative techniques in detail, which are crucial in the optimal removal of endometriosis. Categories: Obstetrics/Gynecology

Keywords

deep rectovaginal endometriosis, discoid bowel resection, laparoscopy, ovarian suspension, ureterolysis

Introduction

Endometriosis is a chronic progressive, clinical, and pathologic entity characterized by the presence of tissue resembling functioning endometrial glands and stroma outside the uterine cavity, affecting 7-11% of women of the reproductive age group [1] . These ectopic endometrial implants have a propensity to bleed under the influence of hormonal changes, and this triggers the inflammatory response in the adjacent areas. This inflammatory response is considered an important factor in the formation of pelvic adhesions. These adhesions can range from flimsy, thin, translucent to a severe condition called a frozen pelvis [1,2] . It presents in three distinct categories, like peritoneal, ovarian, and deep pelvic endometriosis. Deep endometriosis (DE) is identified when there is peritoneum infiltration by endometriotic tissue, more than 5 mm [3] . The various locations for the pathology could be involving uterosacral ligament, bowel, bladder, ureter, vagina, parametrium, and the diaphragm. Deep pelvic endometriosis is the most challenging entity to treat. Medical management may reduce the symptom severity but does not cure the disease. These patients often need surgical excision to manage symptoms of pain, subfertility, sexual problems, and bowel or urinary symptoms [4] . Surgical management of endometriosis involves both minimally invasive, laparoscopic, and robotic excision and open surgical excision. However, laparoscopy has become the standard of care over the years in comparison to open surgery [5] . The basic principles of endometriosis excision surgery remain the same regardless of the surgical approach and location of the disease. Sound and safe operating techniques are crucial in the management and optimal removal of endometriosis. Dissection of the avascular spaces in the pelvis is a key for safe endometriosis surgery [5,6] . We aim to provide detailed surgical techniques for the excision of deep pelvic endometriosis. Technical Report Case details A 31-year-old female had symptoms of dysmenorrhea, dyschezia, dyspareunia, and chronic pelvic pain. She received progesterone hormonal treatment in the past without any significant relief. Transvaginal (TVS) ultrasound pelvis was performed, which showed endometriotic nodules affecting the bilateral uterosacral ligament, pouch of Douglas, and right parametrium (Figure 1A - 1D ). There was also an endometriotic nodule affecting the anterior wall of the upper rectum 12 cm from the anal verge, confined to the muscularis layer. 1 1 Open Access Technical Report How to cite this article More S, Rathod K (May 16, 2025) Laparoscopic Optimal Excision of Deep Rectovaginal Endometriosis: Tips and Techniques. Cureus 17(5): e84239. DOI 10.7759/cureus.84239 FIGURE 1: A) TVS ultrasound image showing an endometriotic nodule in the right uterosacral ligament (green dotted arrow). B) TVS ultrasound image showing an endometriotic nodule in the left uterosacral ligament (green dotted arrow). C) Endometriosis nodule in the right parametrium (yellow arrow). D) Endometriosis nodule along the anterior wall of the upper rectum (yellow arrow, green line outlines the mucosa of the rectum). TVS: transvaginal Pre-surgical evaluation/approach The clinical history and previous medical and surgical treatments related to endometriosis need to be recorded in detail. Therapeutic planning depends on many factors, including the age of the patient, her desire for fertility or pain relief, the duration and intensity of her symptoms, the extent of disease, and previous treatments that have been undertaken. The endometriosis-focused multidisciplinary team discussion with radiology and colorectal team helped us to plan the safe surgical approach. Preoperative TVS ultrasound and MRI pelvis imaging were done to understand the extent of the disease to tailor the surgical planning. Preoperative bowel preparation is essential in all cases. Stepwise description of surgical techniques Adequate Exposure of the Operative Field The mobilization of the sigmoid colon from its embryonic attachment to the lateral pelvic wall was done to achieve clear operative visualization of the pelvic cavity, to prevent inadvertent injury to bowel loops, and to facilitate left ureterolysis (Figure 2A ). The gentle medial and caudal traction by the grasper led to the visualization of the white line of Toldt. The process of the bowel loop mobilization was initiated at the most distal site of the sigmoid colon, which is usually located at the pelvic brim. Following the retraction of the bowel, a peritoneal incision is made lateral and parallel to the descending colon (Figure 2B ). 2025 More et al. Cureus 17(5): e84239. DOI 10.7759/cureus.84239 2 of 6 FIGURE 2: A) Mobilization of the sigmoid colon from its embryonic attachment to the lateral pelvic wall. B) Rectovaginal endometriotic nodule obliterating the pouch of Douglas (green circle). C) Dissection of the left ureter along with its intact vasculature. D) Medial deviation of the right ureter changing its course. Ureterolysis The aim of ureterolysis is to lateralize the ureter, which prevents injury to it during the surgery by keeping it under the direct vision of the surgeon. It also acts as an important anatomical landmark to prevent large vessel injury on the lateral pelvic wall [7] . The dissection of the ureter was started at the plane where the ureter enters the pelvic brim. A tent and incision were made in the normal peritoneum adjacent to the involved area. The inferior margin of the incision was grasped and deviated medially, and the ureter was separated from the peritoneum bluntly (Figure 2C ). In this scenario, the right ureter deviated medially toward fibrosed adipose tissue in the pararectal space and deep rectovaginal endometriosis complex (Figure 2D ). A careful dissection and lateralization of the right ureter was performed to reduce the risk of ureteric injury (Figure 3A ). The important aspect of ureterolysis is to avoid the use of an energy source close to the ureter to maintain its blood supply. Peri-ureteral vessels in the adventitial layer must remain intact to prevent ischemia and resultant fistula formation [7] . 2025 More et al. Cureus 17(5): e84239. DOI 10.7759/cureus.84239 3 of 6 FIGURE 3: A) Medial deviation of the right ureter secondary to fibrosis of the rectovaginal endometriosis nodule (white arrow). B) Bilateral ovaries (white arrow) suspended to the anterior abdominal wall. C) Pararectal avascular space dissection to mobilize the segment of the rectum and hypogastric nerve course (white arrow). D) Discoid resection of the rectum (white circle) due to partial thickness involvement. Ovarian Suspension The suture-mediated elevation of both ovaries was performed to the anterior pelvic wall using synthetic Stratafix 2-0 on a round body needle (Figure 3B ). This allowed access to the ovarian fossa and lateral pelvic wall. It aids in maintaining the traction during dissection, which frees the hands of the operating surgeon/assistant to perform other tasks [8] . These sutures were removed immediately after the procedure was completed. Pararectal and Presacral Space Dissection The pararectal and presacral space is an avascular space that provides access to rthe ectovaginal pouch and the dorsal aspect of the rectum to achieve complete excision of the disease [9] . The use of a rectal probe can facilitate the pararectal space. Careful dissection was performed to prevent injury to the hypogastric nerve plexus (Figure 3C ). Discoid Resection of the Bowel If the endometriosis involves the partial thickness of the rectum, less than 3 cm, and a unifocal lesion, dissection of the nodule can be achieved by discoid resection of the bowel [10,11] . Discoid resection can be achieved by cutting peri-nodular with a scissor or circular stapler (Figure 3D ). After resection, the bowel edge was approximated at the right angle to the long axis of the bowel to avoid the tension on the sutures 2025 More et al. Cureus 17(5): e84239. DOI 10.7759/cureus.84239 4 of 6 and stricture of the bowel. The bowel integrity was confirmed by performing the leak test at the end of the procedure [12,13] . This test is performed by submerging the bowel loops into a pool of clear saline in the POD. We checked for any air bubbles after putting air through the rectum. In the absence of any visible air bubbles, the test confirms the bowel integrity. Post-operative follow-up The post-operative period was uneventful, and the patient was discharged after 24 hours with analgesic and laxative support. Clinical follow-up was done at two weeks and eight weeks at the gynecology and colorectal surgery clinic. It showed improvement in the symptoms with normal bowel and bladder function. The histopathology confirmed endometriosis of the area and two-thirds involvement of the rectal wall without mucosal involvement.

Discussion

Deep rectovaginal endometriosis is one of the most severe forms of endometriosis and affects between 3.8% and 37% of all patients with endometriosis [1,2] . It is considered a stage four according to the American Society of Reproductive Medicine (ASRM) classification [3] . Patients usually present with symptoms of chronic pelvic pain, especially around the menstrual period, dyschezia, or severe dyspareunia. Further approach in these suspected patients involves clinical examination paired with diagnostic imaging, like transvaginal ultrasound and MRI pelvis. Diagnostic imaging plays a vital role in surgical planning. Medical management can give temporary relief from symptoms while waiting for surgery. These patients often need education and support for their emotional and psychological well-being. Surgery for recto-vaginal endometriosis is associated with plenty of technical challenges and calls for thorough evaluation [4,5] . These patients should be treated in specialized centers under a multidisciplinary team approach. Preoperative planning, opening pelvic avascular spaces during the dissection, and a stepwise systematic approach are key for successful surgery [6,7] . Endometriosis lesions with superficial involvement of the rectal wall are preferably treated with local laparoscopic excision in the form of shaving, while segmental rectal resection is needed in the case of severe, circumferential infiltration with stenosis. For intermediate disease, the current practice is discoid resection [10-12] . The recurrence rate of endometriosis is considerably lower with segmental resection and discoid excision than with rectal shaving [12,13] . Recent studies have demonstrated the importance of the nerve-sparing laparoscopic approach while performing excision for DE [14] . It helps to preserve the bowel, bladder, and sexual function by avoiding iatrogenic injury to pelvic autonomic nerves. The careful dissection of the presacral and pararectal space is helpful to prevent iatrogenic injury to pelvic autonomic nerves [14,15] .

Conclusions

The laparoscopic approach for deep endometriosis demands high-level surgical skills, which has a long learning curve but provides superior visualization of the posterior cul-de-sac. The surgical approach allows a high degree of magnification of peritoneal surfaces, which aids in the identification of subtle lesions and also provides a detailed anatomical view of blood vessels, nerves, and the ureter. This leads to precise excision of the endometriotic nodules. Good preoperative workup with transvaginal ultrasound and MRI pelvis, along with a focused multidisciplinary approach, aids in surgical planning for best results. Optimal excision of the endometriosis has a significant impact on the patient’s quality of life as it improves the pain. In our experience, a stepwise approach during the laparoscopic surgery of deep endometriosis gives the best outcome and reduces the surgical morbidity. This stepwise surgical approach is a reproducible skillset that can be transferred to junior laparoscopic surgeons while dealing with deep endometriosis surgery. Additional Information Author Contributions All authors have reviewed the final version to be published and agreed to be accountable for all aspects of the work. Concept and design: Shweta More, Kunal Rathod Drafting of the manuscript: Shweta More Critical review of the manuscript for important intellectual content: Kunal Rathod Disclosures Human subjects: Consent for treatment and open access publication was obtained or waived by all participants in this study. Animal subjects: All authors have confirmed that this study did not involve 2025 More et al. Cureus 17(5): e84239. DOI 10.7759/cureus.84239 5 of 6 animal subjects or tissue. Conflicts of interest: In compliance with the ICMJE uniform disclosure form, all authors declare the following: Payment/services info: All authors have declared that no financial support was received from any organization for the submitted work. Financial relationships: All authors have declared that they have no financial relationships at present or within the previous three years with any organizations that might have an interest in the submitted work. Other relationships: All authors have declared that there are no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work.

References

1 . Handa V, Van Le L: Te Linde's operative gynecology . Wolters Kluwer, Philadelphia; 2020. 2 . Giudice L, Kao L: Endometriosis . Lancet. 2004, 13-9. 10.1016/S0140-6736(04)17403-5 3 . Koninckx PR, Ussia A, Adamyan L, Wattiez A, Donnez J: Deep endometriosis: definition, diagnosis, and treatment . Fertil Steril. 2012, 98:564-71. 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2012.07.1061 4 . Arcoverde FV, Andres MP, Borrelli GM, Barbosa PA, Abrão MS, Kho RM: Surgery for endometriosis improves major domains of quality of life: a systematic review and meta-analysis . J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2019, 26:266-78. 10.1016/j.jmig.2018.09.774 5 . Fleischer K, El Gohari A, Erritty M, Minas V, Khazali S: Excision of endometriosis - optimising surgical techniques . Obstet Gynaecol. 2021, 23:310-7. 10.1111/tog.12762 6 . Cho A, Park CM: Minimally invasive surgery for deep endometriosis . Obstet Gynecol Sci. 2024, 67:49-57. 10.5468/ogs.23176 7 . Chatroux LR, Einarsson JI: Keep your attention closer to the ureters: ureterolysis in deep endometriosis surgery . Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2024, 95:102494. 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2024.102494 8 . Dehbashi Z, Khazali S, Fateme DT, Mottahedian F, Ghajarzadeh M, Saghar SS, Kamali K: Effectiveness of ovarian suspension in preventing postoperative ovarian adhesions in patients with severe pelvic endometriosis—a case-control study . Gynecol Surg. 2019, 16:1-7. 10.1186/s10397-019-1063-y 9 . Zhang S, Yu H, Dong Z, et al.: Laparoendoscopic single-site surgery for deep infiltrating endometriosis based on retroperitoneal pelvic spaces anatomy: a retrospective study . Sci Rep. 2023, 13:10785. 10.1038/s41598-023-38034-8 10 . Koh CE, Juszczyk K, Cooper MJ, Solomon MJ: Management of deeply infiltrating endometriosis involving the rectum . Dis Colon Rectum. 2012, 55:925-31. 10.1097/DCR.0b013e31825f3092 11 . Canon B, Collinet P, Piessen G, Rubod C: Segmentary rectal resection and rectal shaving by laparoscopy for endometriosis: peri-operative morbidity [Article in French] . Gynecol Obstet Fertil. 2013, 41:275-81. 10.1016/j.gyobfe.2013.02.005 12 . Roman H, Loisel C, Resch B, Tuech JJ, Hochain P, Leroi AM, Marpeau L: Delayed functional outcomes associated with surgical management of deep rectovaginal endometriosis with rectal involvement: giving patients an informed choice . Hum Reprod. 2010, 25:890-9. 10.1093/humrep/dep407 13 . Roman H, Vassilieff M, Gourcerol G, et al.: Surgical management of deep infiltrating endometriosis of the rectum: pleading for a symptom-guided approach . Hum Reprod. 2011, 26:274-81. 10.1093/humrep/deq332 14 . Ceccaroni M, Clarizia R, Roviglione G: Nerve-sparing surgery for deep infiltrating endometriosis: laparoscopic eradication of deep infiltrating endometriosis with rectal and parametrial resection according to the Negrar method . J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2020, 27:263-4. 10.1016/j.jmig.2019.09.002 15 . Ceccaroni M, Clarizia R, Roviglione G, Ruffo G. : Neuro-anatomy of the posterior parametrium and surgical considerations for a nerve-sparing approach in radical pelvic surgery . Surg Endosc. 2013, 10.1007/s00464- 013-3043-z 2025 More et al. Cureus 17(5): e84239. DOI 10.7759/cureus.84239 6 of 6

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-pdf

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Condition tags

endometriosisbowel_endometriosis

Citation neighborhood

Papers in the corpus that this work cites (lower rings, blue) and that cite this one (upper rings, green). Dot size scales with the paper's in-corpus citation count — bigger dot = more influential within the endo/adeno field. Click a dot to open that paper. [ expand to 2 hops ] — adds papers reached through this work's immediate citers/citees. Heavier; up to 60 extra dots.

References (15)

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-06-04T01:30:01.192114+00:00
openalex
last seen: 2026-06-04T00:00:01.174412+00:00
pmc
last seen: 2026-05-13T20:22:03.195721+00:00
pubmed
last seen: 2026-05-26T00:31:20.206735+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK