Abstract
Endometriosis is a chronic progressive disease spectrum characterized by the presence of tissue resembling
functioning endometrial glands and stroma outside the uterine cavity. These ectopic implants have a
propensity to bleed, initiating an inflammatory response. One of the most severe forms is deep rectovaginal
endometriosis, which is the most challenging entity to treat. The diagnostic evaluation of these patients
requires a transvaginal ultrasound and an MRI pelvis. Medical management may reduce the symptom
severity but does not cure the disease. These patients often need surgical excision of the endometriosis to
manage symptoms. We aim to describe the approach, principles, and detailed techniques of surgical removal
of deep endometriosis. Complete excision of the deep rectovaginal endometriosis was achieved with
symptomatic relief. This case illustrates our presurgical evaluation and operative techniques in detail, which
are crucial in the optimal removal of endometriosis.
Categories:
Obstetrics/Gynecology
Keywords
deep rectovaginal endometriosis, discoid bowel resection, laparoscopy, ovarian suspension, ureterolysis
Introduction
Endometriosis is a chronic progressive, clinical, and pathologic entity characterized by the presence of tissue
resembling functioning endometrial glands and stroma outside the uterine cavity, affecting 7-11% of women
of the reproductive age group
[1]
. These ectopic endometrial implants have a propensity to bleed under the
influence of hormonal changes, and this triggers the inflammatory response in the adjacent areas. This
inflammatory response is considered an important factor in the formation of pelvic adhesions. These
adhesions can range from flimsy, thin, translucent to a severe condition called a frozen pelvis
[1,2]
. It
presents in three distinct categories, like peritoneal, ovarian, and deep pelvic endometriosis. Deep
endometriosis (DE) is identified when there is peritoneum infiltration by endometriotic tissue, more than 5
mm
[3]
. The various locations for the pathology could be involving uterosacral ligament, bowel, bladder,
ureter, vagina, parametrium, and the diaphragm.
Deep pelvic endometriosis is the most challenging entity to treat. Medical management may reduce the
symptom severity but does not cure the disease. These patients often need surgical excision to manage
symptoms of pain, subfertility, sexual problems, and bowel or urinary symptoms
[4]
. Surgical management
of endometriosis involves both minimally invasive, laparoscopic, and robotic excision and open surgical
excision. However, laparoscopy has become the standard of care over the years in comparison to open
surgery
[5]
.
The basic principles of endometriosis excision surgery remain the same regardless of the surgical approach
and location of the disease. Sound and safe operating techniques are crucial in the management and optimal
removal of endometriosis. Dissection of the avascular spaces in the pelvis is a key for safe endometriosis
surgery
[5,6]
. We aim to provide detailed surgical techniques for the excision of deep pelvic endometriosis.
Technical Report
Case details
A 31-year-old female had symptoms of dysmenorrhea, dyschezia, dyspareunia, and chronic pelvic pain. She
received progesterone hormonal treatment in the past without any significant relief. Transvaginal (TVS)
ultrasound pelvis was performed, which showed endometriotic nodules affecting the bilateral uterosacral
ligament, pouch of Douglas, and right parametrium (Figure
1A
-
1D
). There was also an endometriotic nodule
affecting the anterior wall of the upper rectum 12 cm from the anal verge, confined to the muscularis layer.
1
1
Open Access Technical Report
How to cite this article
More S, Rathod K (May 16, 2025) Laparoscopic Optimal Excision of Deep Rectovaginal Endometriosis: Tips and Techniques. Cureus 17(5):
e84239.
DOI 10.7759/cureus.84239
FIGURE
1: A) TVS ultrasound image showing an endometriotic nodule
in the right uterosacral ligament (green dotted arrow). B) TVS
ultrasound image showing an endometriotic nodule in the left
uterosacral ligament (green dotted arrow). C) Endometriosis nodule in
the right parametrium (yellow arrow). D) Endometriosis nodule along
the anterior wall of the upper rectum (yellow arrow, green line outlines
the mucosa of the rectum).
TVS: transvaginal
Pre-surgical evaluation/approach
The clinical history and previous medical and surgical treatments related to endometriosis need to be
recorded in detail. Therapeutic planning depends on many factors, including the age of the patient, her
desire for fertility or pain relief, the duration and intensity of her symptoms, the extent of disease, and
previous treatments that have been undertaken.
The endometriosis-focused multidisciplinary team discussion with radiology and colorectal team helped us
to plan the safe surgical approach. Preoperative TVS ultrasound and MRI pelvis imaging were done to
understand the extent of the disease to tailor the surgical planning. Preoperative bowel preparation is
essential in all cases.
Stepwise description of surgical techniques
Adequate Exposure of the Operative Field
The mobilization of the sigmoid colon from its embryonic attachment to the lateral pelvic wall was done to
achieve clear operative visualization of the pelvic cavity, to prevent inadvertent injury to bowel loops, and
to facilitate left ureterolysis (Figure
2A
). The gentle medial and caudal traction by the grasper led to the
visualization of the white line of Toldt. The process of the bowel loop mobilization was initiated at the most
distal site of the sigmoid colon, which is usually located at the pelvic brim. Following the retraction of the
bowel, a peritoneal incision is made lateral and parallel to the descending colon (Figure
2B
).
2025 More et al. Cureus 17(5): e84239. DOI 10.7759/cureus.84239
2
of
6
FIGURE
2:
A) Mobilization of the sigmoid colon from its embryonic
attachment to the lateral pelvic wall. B) Rectovaginal endometriotic
nodule obliterating the pouch of Douglas (green circle). C) Dissection of
the left ureter along with its intact vasculature. D) Medial deviation of
the right ureter changing its course.
Ureterolysis
The aim of ureterolysis is to lateralize the ureter, which prevents injury to it during the surgery by keeping it
under the direct vision of the surgeon. It also acts as an important anatomical landmark to prevent large
vessel injury on the lateral pelvic wall
[7]
. The dissection of the ureter was started at the plane where the
ureter enters the pelvic brim. A tent and incision were made in the normal peritoneum adjacent to the
involved area. The inferior margin of the incision was grasped and deviated medially, and the ureter was
separated from the peritoneum bluntly (Figure
2C
). In this scenario, the right ureter deviated medially
toward fibrosed adipose tissue in the pararectal space and deep rectovaginal endometriosis complex (Figure
2D
). A careful dissection and lateralization of the right ureter was performed to reduce the risk of ureteric
injury (Figure
3A
). The important aspect of ureterolysis is to avoid the use of an energy source close to the
ureter to maintain its blood supply. Peri-ureteral vessels in the adventitial layer must remain intact to
prevent ischemia and resultant fistula formation
[7]
.
2025 More et al. Cureus 17(5): e84239. DOI 10.7759/cureus.84239
3
of
6
FIGURE
3: A) Medial deviation of the right ureter secondary to fibrosis
of the rectovaginal endometriosis nodule (white arrow). B) Bilateral
ovaries (white arrow) suspended to the anterior abdominal wall. C)
Pararectal avascular space dissection to mobilize the segment of the
rectum and hypogastric nerve course (white arrow). D) Discoid
resection of the rectum (white circle) due to partial thickness
involvement.
Ovarian Suspension
The suture-mediated elevation of both ovaries was performed to the anterior pelvic wall using synthetic
Stratafix 2-0 on a round body needle (Figure
3B
). This allowed access to the ovarian fossa and lateral pelvic
wall. It aids in maintaining the traction during dissection, which frees the hands of the operating
surgeon/assistant to perform other tasks
[8]
. These sutures were removed immediately after the procedure
was completed.
Pararectal and Presacral Space Dissection
The pararectal and presacral space is an avascular space that provides access to rthe ectovaginal pouch and
the dorsal aspect of the rectum to achieve complete excision of the disease
[9]
. The use of a rectal probe can
facilitate the pararectal space. Careful dissection was performed to prevent injury to the hypogastric nerve
plexus (Figure
3C
).
Discoid Resection of the Bowel
If the endometriosis involves the partial thickness of the rectum, less than 3 cm, and a unifocal lesion,
dissection of the nodule can be achieved by discoid resection of the bowel
[10,11]
. Discoid resection can be
achieved by cutting peri-nodular with a scissor or circular stapler (Figure
3D
). After resection, the bowel
edge was approximated at the right angle to the long axis of the bowel to avoid the tension on the sutures
2025 More et al. Cureus 17(5): e84239. DOI 10.7759/cureus.84239
4
of
6
and stricture of the bowel. The bowel integrity was confirmed by performing the leak test at the end of the
procedure
[12,13]
. This test is performed by submerging the bowel loops into a pool of clear saline in the
POD. We checked for any air bubbles after putting air through the rectum. In the absence of any visible air
bubbles, the test confirms the bowel integrity.
Post-operative follow-up
The post-operative period was uneventful, and the patient was discharged after 24 hours with analgesic and
laxative support. Clinical follow-up was done at two weeks and eight weeks at the gynecology and colorectal
surgery clinic. It showed improvement in the symptoms with normal bowel and bladder function. The
histopathology confirmed endometriosis of the area and two-thirds involvement of the rectal wall without
mucosal involvement.
Discussion
Deep rectovaginal endometriosis is one of the most severe forms of endometriosis and affects between 3.8%
and 37% of all patients with endometriosis
[1,2]
. It is considered a stage four according to the American
Society of Reproductive Medicine (ASRM) classification
[3]
. Patients usually present with symptoms of
chronic pelvic pain, especially around the menstrual period, dyschezia, or severe dyspareunia. Further
approach in these suspected patients involves clinical examination paired with diagnostic imaging, like
transvaginal ultrasound and MRI pelvis. Diagnostic imaging plays a vital role in surgical planning. Medical
management can give temporary relief from symptoms while waiting for surgery. These patients often need
education and support for their emotional and psychological well-being. Surgery for recto-vaginal
endometriosis is associated with plenty of technical challenges and calls for thorough evaluation
[4,5]
.
These patients should be treated in specialized centers under a multidisciplinary team approach.
Preoperative planning, opening pelvic avascular spaces during the dissection, and a stepwise systematic
approach are key for successful surgery
[6,7]
. Endometriosis lesions with superficial involvement of the
rectal wall are preferably treated with local laparoscopic excision in the form of shaving, while segmental
rectal resection is needed in the case of severe, circumferential infiltration with stenosis. For intermediate
disease, the current practice is discoid resection
[10-12]
. The recurrence rate of endometriosis is
considerably lower with segmental resection and discoid excision than with rectal shaving
[12,13]
.
Recent studies have demonstrated the importance of the nerve-sparing laparoscopic approach while
performing excision for DE
[14]
. It helps to preserve the bowel, bladder, and sexual function by avoiding
iatrogenic injury to pelvic autonomic nerves. The careful dissection of the presacral and pararectal space is
helpful to prevent iatrogenic injury to pelvic autonomic nerves
[14,15]
.
Conclusions
The laparoscopic approach for deep endometriosis demands high-level surgical skills, which has a long
learning curve but provides superior visualization of the posterior cul-de-sac. The surgical approach allows a
high degree of magnification of peritoneal surfaces, which aids in the identification of subtle lesions and
also provides a detailed anatomical view of blood vessels, nerves, and the ureter. This leads to precise
excision of the endometriotic nodules. Good preoperative workup with transvaginal ultrasound and MRI
pelvis, along with a focused multidisciplinary approach, aids in surgical planning for best results. Optimal
excision of the endometriosis has a significant impact on the patient’s quality of life as it improves the pain.
In our experience, a stepwise approach during the laparoscopic surgery of deep endometriosis gives the best
outcome and reduces the surgical morbidity. This stepwise surgical approach is a reproducible skillset that
can be transferred to junior laparoscopic surgeons while dealing with deep endometriosis surgery.
Additional Information
Author Contributions
All authors have reviewed the final version to be published and agreed to be accountable for all aspects of the
work.
Concept and design:
Shweta More, Kunal Rathod
Drafting of the manuscript:
Shweta More
Critical review of the manuscript for important intellectual content:
Kunal Rathod
Disclosures
Human subjects:
Consent for treatment and open access publication was obtained or waived by all
participants in this study.
Animal subjects:
All authors have confirmed that this study did not involve
2025 More et al. Cureus 17(5): e84239. DOI 10.7759/cureus.84239
5
of
6
animal subjects or tissue.
Conflicts of interest:
In compliance with the ICMJE uniform disclosure form, all
authors declare the following:
Payment/services info:
All authors have declared that no financial support
was received from any organization for the submitted work.
Financial relationships:
All authors have
declared that they have no financial relationships at present or within the previous three years with any
organizations that might have an interest in the submitted work.
Other relationships:
All authors have
declared that there are no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the
submitted work.
References
1
.
Handa V, Van Le L:
Te Linde's operative gynecology
. Wolters Kluwer, Philadelphia; 2020.
2
.
Giudice L, Kao L:
Endometriosis
. Lancet. 2004, 13-9.
10.1016/S0140-6736(04)17403-5
3
.
Koninckx PR, Ussia A, Adamyan L, Wattiez A, Donnez J:
Deep endometriosis: definition, diagnosis, and
treatment
. Fertil Steril. 2012, 98:564-71.
10.1016/j.fertnstert.2012.07.1061
4
.
Arcoverde FV, Andres MP, Borrelli GM, Barbosa PA, Abrão MS, Kho RM:
Surgery for endometriosis improves
major domains of quality of life: a systematic review and meta-analysis
. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2019,
26:266-78.
10.1016/j.jmig.2018.09.774
5
.
Fleischer K, El Gohari A, Erritty M, Minas V, Khazali S:
Excision of endometriosis - optimising surgical
techniques
. Obstet Gynaecol. 2021, 23:310-7.
10.1111/tog.12762
6
.
Cho A, Park CM:
Minimally invasive surgery for deep endometriosis
. Obstet Gynecol Sci. 2024, 67:49-57.
10.5468/ogs.23176
7
.
Chatroux LR, Einarsson JI:
Keep your attention closer to the ureters: ureterolysis in deep endometriosis
surgery
. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2024, 95:102494.
10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2024.102494
8
.
Dehbashi Z, Khazali S, Fateme DT, Mottahedian F, Ghajarzadeh M, Saghar SS, Kamali K:
Effectiveness of
ovarian suspension in preventing postoperative ovarian adhesions in patients with severe pelvic
endometriosis—a case-control study
. Gynecol Surg. 2019, 16:1-7.
10.1186/s10397-019-1063-y
9
.
Zhang S, Yu H, Dong Z, et al.:
Laparoendoscopic single-site surgery for deep infiltrating endometriosis
based on retroperitoneal pelvic spaces anatomy: a retrospective study
. Sci Rep. 2023, 13:10785.
10.1038/s41598-023-38034-8
10
.
Koh CE, Juszczyk K, Cooper MJ, Solomon MJ:
Management of deeply infiltrating endometriosis involving
the rectum
. Dis Colon Rectum. 2012, 55:925-31.
10.1097/DCR.0b013e31825f3092
11
.
Canon B, Collinet P, Piessen G, Rubod C:
Segmentary rectal resection and rectal shaving by laparoscopy for
endometriosis: peri-operative morbidity [Article in French]
. Gynecol Obstet Fertil. 2013, 41:275-81.
10.1016/j.gyobfe.2013.02.005
12
.
Roman H, Loisel C, Resch B, Tuech JJ, Hochain P, Leroi AM, Marpeau L:
Delayed functional outcomes
associated with surgical management of deep rectovaginal endometriosis with rectal involvement: giving
patients an informed choice
. Hum Reprod. 2010, 25:890-9.
10.1093/humrep/dep407
13
.
Roman H, Vassilieff M, Gourcerol G, et al.:
Surgical management of deep infiltrating endometriosis of the
rectum: pleading for a symptom-guided approach
. Hum Reprod. 2011, 26:274-81.
10.1093/humrep/deq332
14
.
Ceccaroni M, Clarizia R, Roviglione G:
Nerve-sparing surgery for deep infiltrating endometriosis:
laparoscopic eradication of deep infiltrating endometriosis with rectal and parametrial resection according
to the Negrar method
. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2020, 27:263-4.
10.1016/j.jmig.2019.09.002
15
.
Ceccaroni M, Clarizia R, Roviglione G, Ruffo G. :
Neuro-anatomy of the posterior parametrium and surgical
considerations for a nerve-sparing approach in radical pelvic surgery
. Surg Endosc. 2013,
10.1007/s00464-
013-3043-z
2025 More et al. Cureus 17(5): e84239. DOI 10.7759/cureus.84239
6
of
6
Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below.
Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure
cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can
have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy
(via DOI)
is the canonical version.