Direct and Indirect Measurement of the Electronic Levels in Thermally Aged LDPE (Pre-print to be sumbitted to IEEE- Transactions on Dielectrics and Electrical Insulation)

preprint OA: closed
📄 Open PDF Full text JSON View at publisher

Abstract

Thermal aging degrades insulating polymers such as Low-Density Polyethylene (LDPE) through the modification of its electronic structure. The change in electronic levels (such as shallow/deep trap depths, charge injection barriers etc.) with aging is often explained through theories of Isothermal conduction and decay currents (ICC and IDC) and Bipolar Charge Transport (BCT). Although these theories are employed extensively, there is no direct evidence that supports the efficacy of these methods in determining the electronic levels. In addition, there is a considerable discrepancy in the electronic levels estimated from the ICC/IDC and BCT methods. A direct method that serves as an indisputable reference is therefore necessary. This study explores the use of Reflection Electron Energy Loss Spectroscopy (REELS) and Ultraviolet Photoelectron Spectroscopy (UPS) for the same. REELS is used to estimate the bandgap of materials (Eg), while UPS is used to estimate other electronic levels such as Conduction Band Minimum (CBM), Valence Band Maximum (VBM), Vacuum (Evac) levels, and electron affinity (Eea). The electronic levels estimated from this direct method are used to validate the standard indirect methods i.e., (i) fitting ICC/IDC measurements with a two-trap model and (ii) fitting space charge data from Pulsed Electroacoustic Analysis (PEA) with a numerical Bipolar Charge Transport (BCT) model. The results show that the two-trap model demonstrates limited sensitivity to electronic level measurements, whereas the BCT model demonstrates high sensitivity.
Full text 2,811 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · 2 sections · click to expand

Abstract

Thermal aging degrades insulating polymers such as Low-Density Polyethylene (LDPE) through the modification of its electronic structure. The change in electronic levels (such as shallow/deep trap depths, charge injection barriers etc.) with aging is often explained through theories of Isothermal conduction and decay currents (ICC and IDC) and Bipolar Charge Transport (BCT). Although these theories are employed extensively, there is no direct evidence that supports the efficacy of these methods in determining the electronic levels. In addition, there is a considerable discrepancy in the electronic levels estimated from the ICC/IDC and BCT methods. A direct method that serves as an indisputable reference is therefore necessary. This study explores the use of Reflection Electron Energy Loss Spectroscopy (REELS) and Ultraviolet Photoelectron Spectroscopy (UPS) for the same. REELS is used to estimate the bandgap of materials (Eg), while UPS is used to estimate other electronic levels such as Conduction Band Minimum (CBM), Valence Band Maximum (VBM), Vacuum (Evac) levels, and electron affinity (Eea). The electronic levels estimated from this direct method are used to validate the standard indirect methods i.e., (i) fitting ICC/IDC measurements with a two-trap model and (ii) fitting space charge data from Pulsed Electroacoustic Analysis (PEA) with a numerical Bipolar Charge Transport (BCT) model. The results show that the two-trap model demonstrates limited sensitivity to electronic level measurements, whereas the BCT model demonstrates high sensitivity. Supplementary Material File (direct and indirect measurement of electronic levels in thermally aged ldpe.pdf) - Download - 1.12 MB Information & Authors Information Copyright This work is licensed under a Non Exclusive No Reuse License.

Keywords

Authors Metrics & Citations Metrics Article Usage 152views 106downloads Citations Download citation Balaji Sriram, Nandini Gupta. Direct and Indirect Measurement of the Electronic Levels in Thermally Aged LDPE (Pre-print to be sumbitted to IEEE- Transactions on Dielectrics and Electrical Insulation). Authorea. 28 October 2025. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22541/au.176158441.13823370/v2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.22541/au.176158441.13823370/v2 If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download. For more information or tips please see 'Downloading to a citation manager' in the Help menu.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-07-09T06:39:34.564547+00:00