Bifocal endometriomas involving a Pfannenstiel incision. Clinical case

In: General Surgery · 2024 · pp. 48–53 · doi:10.30978/gs-2024-3-48 · W4404420294
article OA: diamond CC0
AI-generated summary by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-14

This case report describes a 37-year-old patient with two endometriomas along a Pfannenstiel incision scar, surgically excised and pathologically confirmed with no recurrence after 19 months.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

AI-generated deep summary by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-14 · read from full text

This paper reports a clinical case of a 37-year-old woman with a painful anterior abdominal wall scar mass after an elective cesarean section, presenting with large tumour-like nodules and severe cyclic, catamenial pain that increased in size during menstruation. Using ultrasonography and computed tomography, the authors identified two abdominal wall endometrioma lesions at corners of the postoperative Pfannenstiel scar, which were excised without damaging lesion integrity. Pathological confirmation showed endometrial glands and cytogenic stroma, supported by immunohistochemical positivity for CD10, CK7, estrogen and progesterone receptors, and low Ki-67 (2%). Follow-up at 19 months found no recurrence, and the paper is a single-case report, limiting generalizability. This paper is centrally about endometriosis — specifically bifocal abdominal wall (Pfannenstiel) scar endometriomas after cesarean delivery.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

Endometrioma of the anterior abdominal wall (EAAW) is a rather rare variant of extragenital endometriosis, which in most cases occurs after obstetrical and gynecological procedures. EAAW presented predominantly as a single tumour‑like mass, and multiple ectopias were observed in only 1.9—5.6% of cases, exclusively after Pfannenstiel laparotomy. Here we present a clinical case of a 37‑year‑old patient who complained of the large tumour‑like nodules along the postoperative anterior abdominal wall scar, accompanied by severe cyclic, catamenial pain. Additionally, the patient noted an increase in tumour size during menstruation. Thirty‑three months ago, she underwent an elected cesarean section for obstetric indications. Based on ultrasonography and computed tomography scans, the presence of two EAAW in the corners of the postoperative scar was established: 46 × 32 × 31 mm and 14 × 18 × 13 mm, respectively. Both lesions were excised out without damaging their integrity. The fascial defect was replaced by synthetic polypropylene mesh. The diagnosis of EAAW was finally confirmed based on pathological (presence of endometrial glands and cytogenic stroma) and immunohistochemical (positive membrane expression of CD10 in cytogenic stroma, intense cytoplasmic expression of CK7 in endometrial glands, marked nuclear expression of progesterone (PR) and estrogen (ER‑α) receptors in endometrial glands and cytogenic stroma, proliferative activity index Ki‑67 — 2%) studies. At a follow‑up after 19 months, the patient was asymptomatic; according to physical examination and ultrasound scan, there was no evidence of recurrence. Abdominal wall endometriosis is a rare condition. Clinicians should be aware of this pathology, especially in women presenting with a painful mass near the scar of a previous obstetrical and gynecological surgery. Surgery is the best treatment modality for endometrioma, whereas its optimal volume is considered to be R0 resection with preservation of endometriomas’ integrity. The final diagnosis of EAAW requires pathological and immunohistochemical confirmation.
Full text 5,695 characters · extracted from oa-html · click to expand
Bifocal endometriomas involving a Pfannenstiel incision. Clinical case DOI: https://doi.org/10.30978/GS-2024-3-48Keywords: extrapelvic endometriosis, scar endometriosis, abdominal wall endometriosis, caesarean sectionAbstract Endometrioma of the anterior abdominal wall (EAAW) is a rather rare variant of extragenital endometriosis, which in most cases occurs after obstetrical and gynecological procedures. EAAW presented predominantly as a single tumour‑like mass, and multiple ectopias were observed in only 1.9—5.6% of cases, exclusively after Pfannenstiel laparotomy. Here we present a clinical case of a 37‑year‑old patient who complained of the large tumour‑like nodules along the postoperative anterior abdominal wall scar, accompanied by severe cyclic, catamenial pain. Additionally, the patient noted an increase in tumour size during menstruation. Thirty‑three months ago, she underwent an elected cesarean section for obstetric indications. Based on ultrasonography and computed tomography scans, the presence of two EAAW in the corners of the postoperative scar was established: 46 × 32 × 31 mm and 14 × 18 × 13 mm, respectively. Both lesions were excised out without damaging their integrity. The fascial defect was replaced by synthetic polypropylene mesh. The diagnosis of EAAW was finally confirmed based on pathological (presence of endometrial glands and cytogenic stroma) and immunohistochemical (positive membrane expression of CD10 in cytogenic stroma, intense cytoplasmic expression of CK7 in endometrial glands, marked nuclear expression of progesterone (PR) and estrogen (ER‑α) receptors in endometrial glands and cytogenic stroma, proliferative activity index Ki‑67 — 2%) studies. At a follow‑up after 19 months, the patient was asymptomatic; according to physical examination and ultrasound scan, there was no evidence of recurrence. Abdominal wall endometriosis is a rare condition. Clinicians should be aware of this pathology, especially in women presenting with a painful mass near the scar of a previous obstetrical and gynecological surgery. Surgery is the best treatment modality for endometrioma, whereas its optimal volume is considered to be R0 resection with preservation of endometriomas’ integrity. The final diagnosis of EAAW requires pathological and immunohistochemical confirmation. References Allen SE, Rindos NB, Mansuria S. Abdominal wall endometriosis: an update in diagnosis, perioperative considerations and management. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2021;33(4):288-95. http://doi.org/10.1097/GCO.0000000000000714. Benedetto C, Cacozza D, de Sousa Costa D, et al. Abdominal wall endometriosis: Report of 83 cases. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2022;159(2):530-6. http://doi.org/10.1002/ijgo.14167. Cho YK, Kocol D, Harkins G, et al. An approach to abdominal-wall endometriosis: A retrospective case series. J Gynecol Surg. 2020;36(1):1-4. http://doi.org/10.1089/gyn.2018.0110. Cojocari N, Ciutacu L, Lupescu I, et al. Parietal endometriosis: A challenge for the general surgeon. Chirurgia (Bucur). 2018;113(5):695-703. http://doi.org/10.21614/chirurgia.113.5.695. Cope AG, Narahulu DM, Khan Z, et al. Nonsurgical radiologic intervention for management of abdominal wall endometriosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Endometr Pelvic Pain Disord. 2020;12(1):41-50. http://doi.org/10.1177/2284026520906060. Foley CE, Ayers PG, Lee TT. Abdominal wall endometriosis. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. 2022;49(2):369-80. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ogc.2022.02.013. Goksever Celik H, Karacan T, Kaya C, et al. Abdominal wall endometriosis: A monocentric continuous series and review of the literature. J Endometr Pelvic Pain Disord. 2019;11(2):95-101. http://doi.org/10.1177/2284026519834465. Hasan A, Deyab A, Monazea K, et al. Clinico-pathological assessment of surgically removed abdominal wall endometriomas following cesarean section. Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2021;62:219-24. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.amsu.2021.01.029. Jaramillo-Cardoso A, Balcacer P, Garces-Descovich A, et al. Multimodality imaging and clinicopathologic assessment of abdominal wall endometriosis: knocking down the enigma. Abdom Radiol (NY). 2020;45(6):1800-12. http://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-018-1666-1. Liu G, Wang Y, Chen Y, Ren F. Malignant transformation of abdominal wall endometriosis: A systematic review of the epidemiology, diagnosis, treatment, and outcomes. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2021;264:363-7. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2021.08.006. Lopez-Soto A, Sanchez-Zapata MI, Martinez-Cendan JP, et al. Cutaneous endometriosis: Presentation of 33 cases and literature review. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2018;221:58-63. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2017.11.024. Matalliotakis M, Matalliotaki C, Zervou MI, et al. Abdominal and perineal scar endometriosis: Retrospective study on 40 cases. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2020;252:225-7. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2020.06.054. Piriyev E, Namazov A, Mahalov I, et al. Clinical and surgical characteristics of abdominal wall endometriosis: A multicenter case series of 80 women. In Vivo. 2023;37(2):756-62. http://doi.org/10.21873/invivo.13138. Song H, Lee S, Kim MJ, et al. Abdominal wall mass suspected of endometriosis: clinical and pathologic features. Obstet Gynecol Sci. 2020;63(3):357-62. http://doi.org/10.5468/ogs.2020.63.3.357. Zhang P, Sun Y, Zhang C, et al. Cesarean scar endometriosis: presentation of 198 cases and literature review. BMC Womens Health. 2019;19(1):14. http://doi.org/10.1186/s12905-019-0711-8. Downloads Published How to Cite Issue Section License Copyright (c) 2024 Authors This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-html

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Condition tags

endometriosisendometrioma

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2024) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

openalex
last seen: 2026-06-10T17:14:06.276822+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK