The Use of Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors in Hospitalized Patients With COVID-19 Is Associated With a Lower Risk of Mortality

preprint OA: closed CC-BY-4.0

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The relationship between the use of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) and angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs), diabetes mellitus (DM), and the risk of death in patients with COVID-19 remains controversial. We hypothesized that DM and certain characteristics of the COVID-19 course during hospital treatment may alter the assessment of the effect of ACEIs/ARBs on COVID-19 outcomes. METHODS: The records of 153 COVID-19 inpatients admitted to a municipal clinic in Kyiv, Ukraine, between October and December 2021 were reviewed. To assess the effect of ARBs/ACEIs and other hypotensive drugs, a No Hypotensives group was used for comparison. A multivariable logistic regression model was employed to assess the odds ratio (OR) of death. RESULTS: If DM was known at the time of hospitalization (n=28), there was a higher proportion of deaths compared to the group without DM (n=125): 53.6% vs. 12.8%, p < 0.001. After adjusting for age, minimal O2 saturation, DM, and antihypertensive therapy, the ACEIs-associated OR was 0.10 (0.02-0.69). The DM-associated OR was 8.25 (1.92-35.42). CONCLUSION: The use of ACEIs in the treatment of COVID-19 inpatients is associated with a lower risk of mortality compared to those not using hypotensive treatment, regardless of the presence of DM.
Full text 621 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
There is a newer version available for this {{ publicationType }}. View latest version {{ publication.field_name }} {{ publication.subfield_name }} Copyright: © {{ publicationYear }} {{ publication.presentation_authors[0].full_name + (publication.presentation_authors.length > 1 ? ' et al' : '') }}. This is an open access publication distributed under the terms of the CC BY 4.0 License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Check the {{ publicationType | capitalize }} Source for copyright and license information. Listen on

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-05-22T02:00:06.705733+00:00
License: CC-BY-4.0