Keywords
Regeneration, Drosophila wing discs , efferocytosis, Draper , hemocytes, 13
mmp2, cell debris, clearance, basement membrane 14
15
Short running head: Efferocytosis clears debris during regeneration 16
17
18
19
1
.CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseavailable under a
was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made
The copyright holder for this preprint (whichthis version posted May 7, 2026. ; https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.05.04.722804doi: bioRxiv preprint
Efferocytosis clears debris during regeneration
Article summary 20
Tissue regeneration requires organized responses to damage, including clearance of 21
cellular debris. Using a genetic ablation system in Drosophila wing imaginal discs, we 22
show that most debris is cleared within two days despite the absence of immune cell 23
recruitment, which is restricted by the basement membrane. In the absence of immune 24
cells, debris clearance occurs through Draper -mediated efferocytosis and lysosomal 25
processing by epithelial cells . Disruption of this pathway delays debris removal and 26
impacts regeneration. Residual debris consists of a heterogeneous mix of cellular 27
components, indicating non-selective clearance. Together, our findings identify epithelial 28
cells as key non-professional phagocytes during regeneration. 29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
2
.CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseavailable under a
was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made
The copyright holder for this preprint (whichthis version posted May 7, 2026. ; https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.05.04.722804doi: bioRxiv preprint
Efferocytosis clears debris during regeneration
Abstract
40
Regeneration is a coordinated process that restores tissue integrity following damage. 41
Following injury, tissues initiate early responses , including epithelial remodeling and 42
clearance of cellular debris. However, how debris clearance is coordinated with 43
regenerative growth to ensure efficient tissue repair remains poorly understood. To 44
address how early damage responses, particularly debris clearance, are coordinated with 45
regeneration, we used a genetic ablation system in Drosophila wing imaginal discs to 46
induce apoptosis in the pouch region. Targeted damage generates cellular debris that 47
localizes to both the apical and basal sides of the epithelium. We show that most cellular 48
debris is cleared within two days after damage, although some debris persists apical to 49
the regenerating epithelium . Notably, immune cells are not recruited to the damaged 50
tissue due to restricted access by an intact basement membrane. Instead, we discovered 51
that debris clearance is mediated by efferocytosis, whereby neighboring hinge epithelial 52
cells activate JNK signaling and engulf debris via lysosomal formation. Reduction of 53
efferocytosis by mutation of the phagocytic receptor Draper delays debris removal and 54
increases debris persistence. This impairment has a modest impact on regeneration, as 55
measured by adult wing size. Finally, our data indicate that residual debris consists of a 56
heterogeneous mixture of cellular components, suggesting no preferential targeting by 57
the clearance machinery. Together, our results reveal a previously unappreciated role for 58
epithelial cells as non-professional phagocytes for debris clearance during regeneration. 59
60
61
3
.CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseavailable under a
was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made
The copyright holder for this preprint (whichthis version posted May 7, 2026. ; https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.05.04.722804doi: bioRxiv preprint
Efferocytosis clears debris during regeneration
Introduction
62
Regeneration proceeds through multiple tightly regulated stages, including early damage-63
sensing responses that initiate regeneration, followed by proliferation and growth, and 64
ultimately repatterning and morphogenesis to restore tissue structure and function 65
(reviewed in Poss and Tanaka 2024; Li et al. 2025). The Drosophila wing imaginal disc is 66
a well- established model system for studying tissue regeneration and repair. These 67
epithelial structures possess robust regenerative capacity and high genetic tractability, 68
making them extensively characterized over the past several decades (reviewed in 69
Tripathi and Irvine 2022; Worley and Hariharan 2022) . Earlier studies primarily relied on 70
physical fragmentation and ex vivo culture of wing discs to investigate regeneration 71
(reviewed in Fox et al. 2020). More recently, the development of genetic ablation systems 72
has enabled precise and controlled induction of tissue damage, providing a powerful 73
approach to study regenerative responses (Smith-Bolton et al. 2009; Bergantiños et al. 74
2010). These systems involve targeted expression of pro- apoptotic factors, leading to 75
rapid, localized apoptosis within the epithelium and the generation of substantial amounts 76
of apoptotic cell debris (reviewed in Fox et al. 2020). Damaged wing discs activate wound-77
responsive mechanisms and multiple molecular pathways that are drivers of 78
regeneration. These drivers include reactive oxygen species (ROS) (Santabárbara-Ruiz 79
et al. 2015; Brock et al. 2017; Khan et al. 2017) , Wingless (Wg) signaling (Smith-Bolton 80
et al. 2009; Harris et al. 2016), Jun N-terminal kinase (JNK) signaling (Bosch et al. 2005; 81
Bergantiños et al. 2010), p38 MAPK activity (Santabárbara-Ruiz et al. 2015), JAK/STAT 82
signaling (Katsuyama et al. 2015; La Fortezza et al. 2016) , Dpp signaling (Herrera et al. 83
2013), and Yorkie (Yki) activity (Sun and Irvine 2010; Grusche et al. 2011) . While 84
4
.CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseavailable under a
was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made
The copyright holder for this preprint (whichthis version posted May 7, 2026. ; https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.05.04.722804doi: bioRxiv preprint
Efferocytosis clears debris during regeneration
apoptosis-induced damage activates these regenerative growth pathways, the extensive 85
cell death necessitates efficient clearance of apoptotic debris from the tissue. 86
87
Rapid and efficient clearance of apoptotic cells is a critical process that maintains tissue 88
homeostasis, suppresses inflammatory responses, and regulates immune signaling 89
(reviewed in Elliott and Ravichandran 2010). Failure to remove apoptotic cells in a timely 90
manner can lead to secondary necrosis and the uncontrolled release of harmful 91
intracellular contents (reviewed in Poon et al. 2014) . Thus, apoptosis must be tightly 92
coupled with the swift clearance of apoptotic debris. Clearance of dead or dying cells is 93
typically mediated by specialized immune cells called professional phagocytes (reviewed 94
in Melcarne et al. 2019). These include macrophages in mammals and plasmatocytes in 95
Drosophila, which serve as the primary cell types responsible for engulfing and removing 96
cellular debris (reviewed in Shklover et al. 2015; Melcarne et al. 2019) . In Drosophila, 97
plasmatocytes phagocytose caspase- activated cells within tumor microenvironments, 98
such as in malignant eye imaginal disc tumors induced by oncogenic mutations (Hirooka 99
et al. 2025) . Furthermore, clearance of apoptotic corpses by plasmatocytes during 100
Drosophila embryonic development represents a well -established paradigm of 101
phagocytosis (Weavers et al. 2016). 102
103
In addition to professional phagocytes, non- professional phagocytes, including tissue-104
resident neighboring cells, also play important roles in engulfing apoptotic material 105
through a process known as efferocytosis (reviewed in Shklover et al. 2015; Melcarne et 106
al. 2019) . While phagocytosis broadly refers to sensing and internaliz ing extracellular 107
5
.CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseavailable under a
was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made
The copyright holder for this preprint (whichthis version posted May 7, 2026. ; https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.05.04.722804doi: bioRxiv preprint
Efferocytosis clears debris during regeneration
particles larger than ~0.5µm, efferocytosis is a specialized form of phagocytosis 108
dedicated to the recognition and clearance of apoptotic cells (reviewed in Uribe -Querol 109
and Rosales 2020; Moon et al. 2023) . In Drosophila, this function is widely distributed 110
across non-professional phagocytes in multiple tissues. For example, glial cells contribute 111
to central nervous system remodeling during development by clearing apoptotic neurons 112
(Kurant et al. 2008; Etchegaray et al. 2016) , while ovarian follicle epithelial cells engulf 113
nurse cells during oogenesis (Meehan et al. 2016; Serizier and McCall 2017) . Similarly, 114
glial cells mediate debris clearance during larval axon pruning (Awasaki and Ito 2004) , 115
and epidermal cells remove degenerating dendrites (Han et al. 2014) . Notably, in 116
Drosophila eye imaginal disc epithelial cells, neighboring cells function as non-117
professional phagocytes and mediate engulfment of oncogenic cells in neoplastic tumor-118
suppressor mutant tissues, highlighting a broader role for epithelial tissues in cell 119
clearance (Ohsawa et al. 2011) . Whether similar non- professional phagocytic 120
mechanisms operate in regenerating wing imaginal discs remains unclear. 121
122
In this study, we investigated how apoptotic cell debris is cleared during wing imaginal 123
disc regeneration. We found that most debris generated by tissue ablation was eliminated 124
within two days post-injury, while a small portion of debris persisted. Notably, Drosophila 125
immune cell subtypes were not recruited to the damaged epithelium. To understand this 126
lack of immune cell involvement, we examined tissue accessibility and found that the 127
intact basement membrane of the regenerating wing disc serves as a physical barrier, 128
restricting immune cell entry. In the absence of professional phagocyte recruitment, we 129
show that neighboring undamaged epithelial cells in the hinge region of the wing disc 130
6
.CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseavailable under a
was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made
The copyright holder for this preprint (whichthis version posted May 7, 2026. ; https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.05.04.722804doi: bioRxiv preprint
Efferocytosis clears debris during regeneration
activate JNK signaling and act as non-professional phagocytes, engulfing and processing 131
apoptotic debris through lysosome formation. We impaired debris clearance by using a 132
mutation in the phagocytic receptor draper, resulting in increased debris persistence and 133
delayed lysosome formation. T his defective debris clearance had minimal impact on 134
overall regeneration, as assessed by adult wing size. Finally, we characterized the 135
composition of debris that persisted more than two days after damage and found it to be 136
a heterogeneous mixture of cellular components and organelles. Together, our results 137
reveal that apoptotic debris clearance is independent of immune cells and instead relies 138
on Draper-mediated efferocytosis by surrounding epithelial cells. 139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
7
.CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseavailable under a
was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made
The copyright holder for this preprint (whichthis version posted May 7, 2026. ; https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.05.04.722804doi: bioRxiv preprint
Efferocytosis clears debris during regeneration
Results
151
Genetic ablation system used to induce tissue damage in wing imaginal discs 152
To understand the early damage response in the wing imaginal disc, we induced targeted 153
tissue damage specifically in the wing pouch, which gives rise to the adult wing blade. To 154
achieve this damage, we used our genetic ablation system (Smith-Bolton et al. 2009) , 155
which combines spatial and temporal control of ablation via GAL4-UAS-GAL80ts to induce 156
tissue damage (Figure 1a) . Apoptosis was induced in third- instar larvae by expressing 157
the pro-apoptotic transgene UAS-reaper in the rotund-GAL4-expressing wing pouch cells. 158
Briefly, the larvae were reared at 18°C, where a tubulin- GAL80ts inhibited apoptosis by 159
restraining GAL4 from binding and activating expression of UAS-reaper. On day 7 after 160
egg lay, the temperature was shifted to 30°C to relieve the inhibition by GAL80ts, enabling 161
GAL4-induced Reaper to drive cell death in the wing imaginal disc pouch cells for 24 162
hours. The animals were then shifted back to 18°C to permit regeneration, and the 163
subsequent recovery timepoints (0 to 72 hours post -damage) were used to assess the 164
process of regeneration in the wing discs, including early damage responses such as 165
debris clearance. Adult wing sizes were used as a readout of the regenerative capacity 166
of the larval wing imaginal discs. 167
168
To examine early responses to tissue damage, wing imaginal discs were characterized 169
morphologically using confocal microscopy (Figure 1b-d). We used double-sided tape as 170
spacers while mounting to preserve the 3- dimensional architecture of the fixed wing 171
imaginal disc (Aldaz et al. 2010). The epithelial organization of the wing imaginal disc was 172
8
.CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseavailable under a
was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made
The copyright holder for this preprint (whichthis version posted May 7, 2026. ; https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.05.04.722804doi: bioRxiv preprint
Efferocytosis clears debris during regeneration
resolved by orthogonal projection of z-stack images, revealing the squamous peripodium 173
and the columnar disc proper (Figure1b- d) (reviewed in Tripathi and Irvine 2022) . This 174
Method
of imaging allowed us to observe distinctive folds in the columnar epithelium 175
between the notum, hinge, and wing pouch, denoted as Notum-Hinge (N-H), Hinge-Hinge 176
(H-H), and Hinge-Pouch (H-P) folds (Figure 1b, d). 177
178
Cellular debris is cleared during the first 48 hours of regeneration with some 179
persisting debris 180
Two of the initial steps in early regeneration are re- establishing tissue continuity and 181
clearing cellular debris (reviewed in Smith-Bolton 2016). To determine how cellular debris 182
is processed, we closely examined the dynamics of debris clearance during wing imaginal 183
disc regeneration. To label cellular debris, we expressed UAS -EYFP along with our 184
ablation system, which resulted in EYFP expression in all cells in which GAL4 induced 185
expression of reaper. As a result, the EYFP signal was observed in apoptotic cells and 186
the resulting cellular debris. To obtain a comprehensive view of debris clearance, we 187
examined orthogonal slices of confocal image stacks of undamaged and regenerating 188
wing imaginal discs (Figure 2, S1). 189
190
In the undamaged control, rotund-expressing cells were detected via EYFP signal in the 191
pouch, extending from the H-P fold to the end of the wing pouch (Figure 2a-a”). The EYFP 192
signal was also observed within the adult muscle precursor cells adjacent to the notum, 193
as marked by Cut expression (Figure S1a-a***), a marker for adult muscle precursor cells 194
9
.CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseavailable under a
was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made
The copyright holder for this preprint (whichthis version posted May 7, 2026. ; https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.05.04.722804doi: bioRxiv preprint
Efferocytosis clears debris during regeneration
(Sudarsan et al. 2001) . Following damage, at 0 hours of recovery (R0), an extensive 195
amount of cellular debris was detected adjacent to the remaining pouch. The EYFP -196
labelled cellular debris predominantly localized apically to the epithelium of the disc 197
proper, with a smaller portion extruded basally (Figure 2b- b”). This localization is 198
consistent with our previous observations after ablating most of the wing pouch (Brock et 199
al. 2017), but contrasts with debris localization after ablation of smaller areas of cells, 200
which primarily extrude basally (Bergantiños et al. 2010). Surprisingly, we also observed 201
some debris in the undamaged hinge epithelium marked by the H -H fold (Figure 2b-b’’). 202
3D renderings of regenerating wing imaginal discs at R0 that excluded the peripodium 203
confirmed this pattern of debris localization (Figure 2c-f). 204
205
To measure the amount of cell debris in the regenerating wing pouch over time, we 206
estimated debris volume throughout the regeneration time course by first quantifying the 207
planar area of debris using UAS-EYFP signal in the top- down (XY) images and then 208
multiplying it by debris height in orthogonal (YZ) cross -sections. By R4, the amount of 209
debris visible in the orthogonal (YZ) cross -sections was less than that at R0, with some 210
portion of debris still detected within the undamaged hinge epithelium (Figure 2g-g”). We 211
did not detect a statistically significant reduction in the volume of debris from R4 to R12 212
(Figures S1b-d”, 2k). At R16, we observed a noticeable drop in debris volume, marking a 213
second phase of clearance (Figure 2h-h’’, 2k). By R24, most basal EYFP-labeled debris 214
had been cleared, while the remaining apical debris was confined to the lumen between 215
the peripodium and the disc proper (Figure 2i -i”), consistent with our previous 216
observations at this time point (Brock et al. 2017). The overall debris volume, planar area, 217
10
.CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseavailable under a
was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made
The copyright holder for this preprint (whichthis version posted May 7, 2026. ; https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.05.04.722804doi: bioRxiv preprint
Efferocytosis clears debris during regeneration
and height remained unchanged through R36 (Figure 2k, S1e- g). By R48, most of the 218
cellular debris had been eliminated, although some remnants persisted on the apical side 219
of the columnar epithelium (Figure 2j-j”,k). Taken together, these results suggest that by 220
two days post -damage, cellular debris is largely cleared, although a residual fraction 221
persists in the regenerating wing disc. 222
223
Debris clearance during regeneration occurs independently of immune cell 224
recruitment 225
We next asked how cell debris is cleared in the regenerating wing imaginal disc. Previous 226
work from our lab showed robust Reactive Oxygen Species (ROS) in both cellular debris 227
and the regenerating epithelium, but no detectable hemocyte recruitment at 24 hours 228
post-damage (R24) (Khan et al. 2017). Because a major portion of cell debris is cleared 229
by R24, we reasoned that if hemocytes contribute to this process, their involvement would 230
occur earlier. Therefore, we examined earlier time points to determine whether any of the 231
three major Drosophila hemocyte classes, plasmatocytes, lamellocytes, or crystal cells 232
(reviewed in Mathey -Prevot and Perrimon 1998) , are recruited to the damaged 233
epithelium. 234
235
To assess plasmatocyte recruitment, we used the plasmatocyte- specific reporter 236
Hemolectin-RFP (Hml -RFP) (Makhijani et al. 2011) , and immunostained for the 237
plasmatocyte marker Nimrod (NimC) (Kurucz, Váczi, et al. 2007; Kurucz, Márkus, et al. 238
2007) (Figure S2). Although a small number of Hml-positive plasmatocytes were present 239
11
.CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseavailable under a
was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made
The copyright holder for this preprint (whichthis version posted May 7, 2026. ; https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.05.04.722804doi: bioRxiv preprint
Efferocytosis clears debris during regeneration
in the undamaged control discs, their numbers were considerably reduced at R0 and were 240
not significantly different than the controls at R24 (Figure S2a-d). To assess plasmatocyte 241
presence specifically in the regenerating pouch, we quantified Hml -positive cells in the 242
pouch region, marked using the UAS-EYFP debris reporter. This analysis revealed no 243
significant differences across conditions (Figure S2e). 244
245
Similar results were observed with immunostaining for anti -NimC, where we detected a 246
few NimC-positive cells in the undamaged control discs (Figure S2 f-f’). At R0, the number 247
of NimC-positive cells was significantly reduced and w as not significantly different than 248
controls at R24 (Figure S2 f-j), consistent with our previous report (Khan et al. 2017). 249
250
A recent report showed that the detection of hemocytes in the wing imaginal disc can be 251
influenced by immunostaining procedures, with hemocytes getting dislodged by rigorous 252
washing (Zhu et al. 2025) . Therefore, we repeated the NimC experiments without 253
subjecting the discs to vigorous washes after dissection and after incubation with primary 254
and secondary antibody (Figure 3). Although some NimC -positive plasmatocytes were 255
detected in the no- wash condition at both R0 and R24 in the damaged pouch, these 256
numbers were not significantly different from the respective undamaged controls at 0 and 257
24 hours after thermal shift (Figure 3a- e). The orthogonal YZ slices showed that NimC -258
positive plasmatocytes were attached to the basal side of the disc proper in the 259
undamaged discs . In contrast, at R0 and R24, plasmatocytes were predominantly 260
localized to the basal side of the peripodial epithelium, a region that lacks cell debris 261
12
.CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseavailable under a
was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made
The copyright holder for this preprint (whichthis version posted May 7, 2026. ; https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.05.04.722804doi: bioRxiv preprint
Efferocytosis clears debris during regeneration
localization (Figure 3f-h). The overall number of NimC-positive plasmatocytes across the 262
whole disc was not significantly different in the no- wash condition when comparing the 263
R0 and R24 regenerating discs to their respective controls (Figure S3a). Additionally, we 264
observed no significant differences in the number of NimC -positive plasmatocytes in the 265
undamaged pouch between the wash and no- wash conditions (Figure S3b) . While a 266
significantly higher number of NimC -positive cells was detected at R0 in the no- wash 267
condition compared to the wash condition (Figure S3b), the number was not significantly 268
different from the undamaged no wash condition. Together, these results show no 269
detectable increase in plasmatocytes in the regenerating wing imaginal disc, while 270
suggesting that the plasmatocytes present at damaged and undamaged discs at R0 may 271
be more easily dislodged. 272
273
We next sought to detect the presence of lamellocytes using established markers 274
(reviewed in Evans et al. 2014) : Atilla/L1 (Kurucz, Váczi, et al. 2007; Evans et al. 2014), 275
Atilla-MiET1, a GFP reporter element insertion which allows in vivo detection of 276
lamellocyte differentiation (Honti et al. 2009), ItgαPS4 (Irving et al. 2005; Krzemień et al. 277
2007), and MSNF9 (Tokusumi et al. 2009) . To validate Atilla antibody specificity for 278
lamellocytes, we immunostained third- instar larval hemolymph with Atilla antibody and 279
confirmed that it selectively labels lamellocytes (Figure S4a-a’), which are larger than 40 280
µm, consistent with previous reports (reviewed in Lan et al. 2020) . We examined 281
regenerating and control wing discs and found no Atilla- positive lamellocytes in the 282
undamaged, R0 or R24 discs. However, the antibody marked discs in a consistent 283
speckled pattern within the disc and debris (Figure S4b-d’). To confirm what lamellocytes 284
13
.CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseavailable under a
was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made
The copyright holder for this preprint (whichthis version posted May 7, 2026. ; https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.05.04.722804doi: bioRxiv preprint
Efferocytosis clears debris during regeneration
would look like in the wing imaginal discs, we used a model that overproduces 285
lamellocytes, caused by the gain- of-function allele hop[Tum] (Luo et al. 1995) , which 286
encodes a constitutively active form of the Hopscotch (Hop)-encoded Janus kinase (JAK). 287
Larvae carrying this mutation develop a melanotic tumor phenotype characterized by 288
extensive lamellocyte differentiation in a temperature- dependent manner and presence 289
of lamellocytes throughout the animal, including at the imaginal discs. We observed 290
lamellocytes in the hemolymph samples as well as on the wing imaginal discs from 291
hop[Tum] larvae by immunostaining with the Atilla antibody (Figure S4e-f’). No lamellocytes 292
were detected in undamaged or R0 discs under no- wash conditions using the anti -Atilla 293
antibody (Figure S4g- g′). We further examined lamellocyte markers αPS4- GFP and 294
MSNF9mo-GFP, confirming their specificity by co-staining with the Atilla antibody (Figure 295
S5a-b″). Consistent with these results, no lamellocytes were detected in undamaged or 296
R0 discs using αPS4 -GFP, MSNF9mo-GFP, or the Atilla-MiET1 reporter (Figure S5c -i). 297
Together, these findings indicate that lamellocytes are not recruited to damaged wing 298
discs for debris clearance. 299
300
We then assessed the presence of crystal cells using the crystal cell markers PPO1 301
(reporter line PPO1-mcherry.F6) (Tokusumi et al. 2017), and Lozenge (Lz) (Lebestky et 302
al. 2000) . A few PPO1 -mcherry.F6 positive cells were detected in both undamaged 303
control discs and regenerating discs at R0 (Figure S6a-b’). However, their numbers were 304
not significantly different between undamaged and R0 conditions in either the whole disc 305
or the regenerating pouch (Figure S6c-d). By contrast, neither the anti-Lz immunostaining 306
nor the GFP-tagged Lz protein detected any crystal cells in the regenerating discs (Figure 307
14
.CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseavailable under a
was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made
The copyright holder for this preprint (whichthis version posted May 7, 2026. ; https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.05.04.722804doi: bioRxiv preprint
Efferocytosis clears debris during regeneration
S6e-h’). Thus, crystal cells are not significantly increased in number in the regenerating 308
wing imaginal discs. 309
310
Finally, to confirm the absence of hemocyte recruitment to the debris region of the 311
regenerating wing imaginal discs, we tested two pan- hemocyte markers: Hemese (He) 312
(Kurucz et al. 2003), and Serpent (Srp) (reviewed in Evans et al. 2014). Immunostaining 313
with an anti-Hemese antibody revealed no significant difference between the number of 314
He-positive hemocytes, both in the pouch and throughout the disc, at R0 and R24 315
compared to the undamaged controls under the no- wash conditions (Figure S7a- e). To 316
further evaluate hemocyte presence, we verified the pan- hemocyte reporter srpHemo -317
H2A::3xmCh, where the srpHemo promoter drives a fusion of 124 amino acids of Histone 318
H2A linked to 3xmCherry, concentrating the fluorescence in the nucleus, and SrpHemo -319
3xmCh, where the srpHemo promoter drives a fusion of three copies of mCherry that 320
localizes to the cytoplasm (Gyoergy et al. 2018). These transgenes are reported to detect 321
all three hemocyte sub-classes: plasmatocytes, lamellocytes, and crystal cells. In the third 322
instar larval hemolymph, we found that plasmatocytes positive for NimC (white arrows, 323
Figure S8a-a’, a’’’) and crystal cells positive for Lz-GFP (yellow arrow, Figure S8a’’-a’’’) 324
expressed the srpHemo-H2A::3XmCh reporter. Interestingly, we also observed some srp-325
positive cells that were not positive for either NimC1 or Lz (orange arrows, Figure S8a”’). 326
We also detected lamellocytes double- positive for both Atilla and the srpHemo -327
H2A::3xmCh reporter (Figure S8b-b”’). Together, these results indicate that the srpHemo 328
reporters reliably label plasmatocytes, lamellocytes, and crystal cells, while also marking 329
a small population of mCherry-positive cells lacking these three hemocyte markers. 330
15
.CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseavailable under a
was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made
The copyright holder for this preprint (whichthis version posted May 7, 2026. ; https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.05.04.722804doi: bioRxiv preprint
Efferocytosis clears debris during regeneration
331
On testing these reporters in regenerating wing discs, we detected srpHemo -332
H2A::3XmCh-positive nuclei at R0, R24, and R48, compared to very few in the 333
undamaged controls (Figure S8c-f). Given that none of the three immune cell types were 334
detected in our previous experiments, we hypothesized that the mCherry-positive nuclei 335
might represent primocytes, a distinct cell type that expresses srp but lacks mature 336
hemocyte marker expression (Fu et al. 2020) , or they might result from unexpected 337
reporter expression in the ablated cells or the regenerating epithelium. To test whether 338
primocytes were present in the regenerating disc, we stained R48 srpHemo-H2A::3xmCh 339
discs with an anti -Antennapedia antibody (Antp), which is a primocyte marker (Fu et al. 340
2020). We detected no Antp expression in the mCherry-positive nuclei, thereby ruling out 341
the presence of primocytes (Figure S8g-g’). 342
343
Orthogonal YZ slices of the srpHemo- H2A::3xmCh discs at R48 revealed mCherry -344
positive nuclei that colocalized within the regenerating epithelium marked by Discs-large 345
(Dlg) and DAPI (Figure S8h- h’). This unexpected finding prompted further investigation 346
into the identity of the cells containing the mCherry-positive nuclei. Given that hemocytes 347
and columnar epithelial cells are very different in shape, we used a srpHemo -348
moe::3xmCh transgene, in which the mCherry -tagged Moesin would mark the actin 349
cytoskeleton and reveal the morphology of the mCherry-expressing cells (Gyoergy et al. 350
2018). At R48, srpHemo-moe::3xmCh expression showed that these cells had a columnar 351
16
.CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseavailable under a
was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made
The copyright holder for this preprint (whichthis version posted May 7, 2026. ; https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.05.04.722804doi: bioRxiv preprint
Efferocytosis clears debris during regeneration
shape and were integrated into the regenerating epithelium, indicating that they are not 352
immune cells but disc proper cells expressing this reporter (Figure S8i-i’’). 353
Thus, we are likely observing regeneration- associated activation of the srp promoter 354
fragment rather than recruitment or persistence of srp -positive hemocytes in the 355
regenerating disc. Collectively, these findings indicate that immune cells are not recruited 356
for debris clearance in the regenerating wing imaginal discs. 357
358
Intact basement membrane restricts immune cell recruitment in the regenerating 359
epithelium 360
Given our previous analysis showing that immune cells are not recruited to regenerating 361
wing imaginal discs, we asked what factors restrict immune cell recruitment to this tissue. 362
In damaged eye discs, reactive oxygen species (ROS) recruit hemocytes to the site of 363
damage, which then serve as a stimulus to activate JNK signaling in the regenerating 364
epithelium (Fogarty et al. 2016). In regenerating wing discs, although we observe a similar 365
upregulation of ROS and JNK signaling (Khan et al. 2017) , we do not detect increased 366
recruitment of immune cells. This discrepancy prompted us to investigate how immune 367
cell recruitment differs between eye and wing discs, despite their overall structural 368
similarity. 369
370
A prior study in developing wing discs demonstrated that damage to the basement 371
membrane is sufficient to recruit hemocytes (Diwanji and Bergmann 2020) . Using eye 372
imaginal discs, the same group showed that damaged eye discs exhibit basement 373
17
.CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseavailable under a
was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made
The copyright holder for this preprint (whichthis version posted May 7, 2026. ; https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.05.04.722804doi: bioRxiv preprint
Efferocytosis clears debris during regeneration
membrane disruption (Diwanji and Bergmann 2020) . To test whether basement 374
membrane integrity similarly regulates immune cell recruitment in regenerating wing 375
discs, we overexpressed matrix metalloproteinase 2 ( Mmp2), an endopeptidase that 376
cleaves components of the basement membrane and extracellular matrix (reviewed in 377
Page-McCaw et al. 2007) . In undamaged and regenerating wing discs, the basement 378
membrane was visualized using Vkg-GFP, a protein trap including GFP fused to Collagen 379
IV encoded by the viking gene (Morin et al. 2001) (Figure 4a-f ). At R0, control 380
regenerating discs showed a continuous basement membrane in the pouch region, 381
although Vkg- GFP signal intensity appeared reduced compared to the pouch in 382
undamaged control discs (Figure 4a-b ’). In undamaged discs, NimC -positive 383
plasmatocytes were attached to the basal side of either the disc proper or the peripodial 384
epithelium in 11 out of 23 discs (Figure 3f, Figure 4a- a’, d). In the regenerating control 385
discs at R0, NimC- positive plasmatocytes were rarely detected, and, when present, 386
remained associated with the peripodium and did not invade the disc epithelium in 8 out 387
of 24 discs (Figure 3g , Figure 4b- b’,e). By contrast, upon mmp2 overexpression, we 388
observed disruption of basement membrane at R0, indicated by loss of Vkg- GFP 389
continuity, along with invasion of NimC -positive cells into the disc epithelium (Figure 4c -390
c’). The presence of immune cell clusters within the damaged pouch in 4 out of 8 discs 391
(Figure 4f) indicates that, in regenerating wing discs, an intact basement membrane 392
functions as a physical barrier to immune cell invasion, distinguishing their damage 393
response from that of damaged eye discs. 394
395
18
.CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseavailable under a
was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made
The copyright holder for this preprint (whichthis version posted May 7, 2026. ; https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.05.04.722804doi: bioRxiv preprint
Efferocytosis clears debris during regeneration
Debris clearance during regeneration is associated with lysosome formation in 396
hinge epithelial cells 397
Having tested the role of hemocytes, the professional phagocytes in Drosophila, and 398
finding no evidence for their involvement in debris clearance, we next investigated 399
whether non- professional phagocytes might instead mediate debris clearance during 400
regeneration. Several Drosophila cell types can carry out efferocytosis, or phagocytosis 401
of apoptotic debris, including ovarian follicle epithelial cells (reviewed in Serizier and 402
McCall 2017) , eye imaginal disc epithelial cells that eliminate oncogenic neighbors 403
(Ohsawa et al. 2011), and embryonic glia (reviewed in Heron et al. 2023). As previously 404
observed, our UAS-EYFP labelled debris revealed debris from the damaged pouch within 405
the cells of the adjacent hinge epithelium fold (Figure 5a-a ”). This observation is 406
consistent with a role for neighboring hinge epithelial cells in engulfing apoptotic debris 407
generated during pouch ablation. To assess whether there is an increase in phagosomes 408
in the hinge that could be clearing debris, we stained regenerating wing imaginal discs 409
with LysoTracker, a marker of phagosome maturation that labels the completion of the 410
phagocytic engulfment process (Awasaki and Ito 2004; Kurant et al. 2008). We detected 411
very few LysoTracker-positive puncta in both top-down views and orthogonal YZ slices in 412
the undamaged discs (Figure 5b , Figure S9a -a″). Upon damage, LysoTracker -positive 413
puncta were detected in R0 discs, specifically in the hinge- pouch fold (Figure 5c- e’). 414
Quantification showed that damaged R0 discs contained significantly more LysoTracker-415
positive puncta compared to undamaged controls or R24 discs (Figure 5f-g). 416
417
19
.CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseavailable under a
was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made
The copyright holder for this preprint (whichthis version posted May 7, 2026. ; https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.05.04.722804doi: bioRxiv preprint
Efferocytosis clears debris during regeneration
Closer examination of R0 discs, with the epithelium marked by Discs large (Dlg), revealed 418
that these lysosomes were confined to the neighboring hinge-pouch epithelial fold (Figure 419
5d-d’, e-e’). LysoTracker-positive puncta overlapped with the UAS -EYFP-labeled debris 420
and were colocalized within the Dlg-marked epithelium as seen by both top-down and YZ 421
orthogonal slices (Figure 5d’-e’, h-h”’). 422
423
To refine our understanding of the spatial and temporal dynamics of debris engulfment 424
and lysosome formation during regeneration, we analyzed additional regeneration time 425
points. At R4 and R8, LysoTracker-positive puncta were detected in the hinge epithelium, 426
where they colocalized with the EYFP -labeled debris (Figure S9b- c”). By R10 and R12, 427
puncta persisted primarily within the hinge-hinge and hinge-pouch epithelial folds (Figure 428
S9d-e”). By R24, we observed a significant reduction in the number of LysoTracker -429
positive puncta relative to R0 (Figure 5e-f, and S9f-f”), consistent with our previous finding 430
that cellular debris volume declines by this stage. By R48, LysoTracker -positive signal 431
was largely absent, as confirmed by orthogonal YZ imaging (Figure S9g-g”). 432
433
To confirm the efferocytosis function of the underlying hinge epithelial cells, we tested the 434
genetically encoded fluorescent reporter CharON (Caspase and pH -Activated Reporter, 435
Fluorescence ON), which enables tracking of emerging apoptotic debris and its clearance 436
by efferocytosis (Raymond et al. 2022). Although this reporter has previously been used 437
to detect clearance of apoptotic debris by phagocytes in the Drosophila embryo 438
(Raymond et al. 2022) , we applied it here to the regenerating wing imaginal discs. The 439
20
.CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseavailable under a
was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made
The copyright holder for this preprint (whichthis version posted May 7, 2026. ; https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.05.04.722804doi: bioRxiv preprint
Efferocytosis clears debris during regeneration
UAS-CharON dual reporter consists of a pH -tolerant pH -Caspase-GFP domain that 440
reports apoptosis and a pHlorina red- fluorescent pH sensor that exhibits increased 441
fluorescence upon acidification during apoptotic debris internalization (Raymond et al. 442
2022). At R0, we detected a pHlorina signal localized to the hinge-pouch fold, as observed 443
in YZ orthogonal sections (10/17 discs), where it colocalized with the pH -Caspase-GFP 444
signal (Figure S9h- h″), consistent with efferocytic processing of apoptotic debris . 445
However, signal intensity was variable when using the CharON reporter. 446
447
In eye imaginal discs, activation of JNK signaling in neighboring epithelial cells promotes 448
the elimination of neoplastic tumor cells by engulfment (Ohsawa et al. 2011) . To test 449
whether JNK signaling occurs in hinge- pouch epithelial cells during debris clearance in 450
regenerating wing discs, we used the transcriptional JNK signaling reporter TRE-RFP 451
(Chatterjee and Bohmann 2012) . At R0, we observed localization of both LysoTracker 452
signal and TRE -RFP expression within hinge- pouch fold epithelial cells (Figure 5i-i ”’). 453
Together, these results support a model in which, after tissue ablation, activation of JNK 454
signaling in neighboring hinge epithelial cells promotes lysosome formation and epithelial 455
engulfment, leading to efficient clearance of cellular debris. 456
457
Reduction of engulfment receptor Draper impairs cell debris clearance and 458
lysosome formation in regenerating wing discs 459
Next, we asked whether reducing the uptake of cellular debris affects its clearance and 460
subsequent regeneration of the damaged disc . We focused on the phagocytic receptor 461
21
.CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseavailable under a
was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made
The copyright holder for this preprint (whichthis version posted May 7, 2026. ; https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.05.04.722804doi: bioRxiv preprint
Efferocytosis clears debris during regeneration
Draper ( Drpr), which is the Drosophila ortholog of CED -1, a transmembrane receptor 462
required for engulfment of neurons (Freeman et al. 2003) , bacteria (Cuttell et al. 2008) , 463
severed axons (MacDonald et al. 2006) , germline cells in the ovary (Etchegaray et al. 464
2012), and imaginal disc cells during cell competition (Li and Baker 2007) . Although 465
multiple engulfment receptors have been described in Drosophila, we focused on Draper 466
because of its well -established role in mediating engulfment across diverse 467
developmental and injury contexts (Serizier and McCall 2017). 468
469
We used the drprΔ5 null allele(Freeman et al. 2003) to impair Draper function. First, we 470
confirmed that Draper protein levels were reduced in a heterozygous drprΔ5 /+ background 471
by immunostaining with Draper antibody (Figure S10a- c). We then examined the effects 472
of Draper reduction on debris clearance during wing disc regeneration by quantifying the 473
volume of EYFP -labeled cellular debris at multiple regeneration time points (Figure 6a-474
g). At R0, regenerating drpr Δ5 /+ discs exhibited a significant increase in debris volume 475
compared to controls (Figure 6a- b’, g). While debris volume decreased over time in 476
control discs, drprΔ5 /+ discs showed a continued presence of debris at R24, indicating 477
impaired clearance (Figure 6c -d’, g). This defect persisted at R48, when debris was 478
largely eliminated in controls but remained elevated in drprΔ5 /+ discs, with no significant 479
reduction in volume compared to R0 levels (Figure 6e- f’, g). Consistent with these 480
findings, debris planar area was significantly increased in drpr Δ5 /+ discs compared to 481
controls at all three regeneration time points (Figure S10d). Debris height was 482
comparable between controls and drprΔ5 /+ mutants at R0; however, at both R24 and R48, 483
22
.CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseavailable under a
was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made
The copyright holder for this preprint (whichthis version posted May 7, 2026. ; https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.05.04.722804doi: bioRxiv preprint
Efferocytosis clears debris during regeneration
debris height was increased in the drprΔ5 /+ discs, suggesting stalled or delayed debris 484
clearance (Figure S10e). 485
486
We next examined whether impaired debris clearance in drpr Δ5 /+ discs was associated 487
with altered lysosome formation. In control regenerating discs, lysosome number was 488
highest at R0 and progressively decreased at R24 and R48 (Figure 6h- n). By contrast, 489
drprΔ5 /+ discs exhibited a marked reduction in lysosome number at R0 (Figure 6h-n and 490
S10f-g) followed by an increase at R24 (Figure 6n and S10h- i) and sustained elevated 491
lysosome numbers at R48 compared to controls (Figure 6n, S10j -k). Together, these 492
observations indicate that Draper reduction leads to impaired debris clearance 493
accompanied by a temporal shift in lysosome formation. 494
495
To determine whether defective debris clearance impacts regenerative capacity, we 496
assessed pouch regrowth by staining regenerating discs with the wing pouch marker 497
Nubbin (Nub) to quantify pouch area at R48 (Figure S11a-c). We observed no significant 498
difference in Nub-positive pouch area between drprΔ5 /+ discs and controls (Figure S11c), 499
indicating that growth through this time point is comparable. To understand the effect of 500
impaired debris clearance on regeneration, we quantified adult wing size following disc 501
regeneration (Figure S11d). The adult wings derived from drprΔ5 /+ revealed a difference 502
in the distribution of adult wing sizes between controls and drprΔ5 /+ animals, as observed 503
by chi- square analysis . The distribution of adult wing sizes in the mutant showed an 504
increased proportion of severely reduced (0- 25%) and reduced (50%) wings (Figure 505
23
.CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseavailable under a
was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made
The copyright holder for this preprint (whichthis version posted May 7, 2026. ; https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.05.04.722804doi: bioRxiv preprint
Efferocytosis clears debris during regeneration
S11d). Taken together, these results demonstrate that epithelial debris clearance during 506
regeneration is at least partially mediated by the phagocytic receptor Draper. Reduction 507
of this Draper-mediated efferocytosis has a modest impact on wing disc regeneration. 508
509
Persistent debris in the regenerating discs consists of heterogeneous cellular 510
components 511
Our findings thus far indicate that although the majority of cellular debris is cleared by 512
R48 during wing disc regeneration, small remnants of debris persist within the tissue. We 513
therefore sought to determine the composition of this persistent debris. Using UAS -514
mCherry (Ni et al. 2011) to label cell debris, we examined the colocalization of residual 515
debris with markers for different cellular components and organelles. We hypothesized 516
that selective engulfment or clearance might result in preferential persistence of specific 517
cellular constituents. 518
519
We did not observe persistence of distinct cellular components within the debris at R48 520
(Figure 7). Instead, the residual debris consisted of a heterogeneous mixture of cellular 521
materials. Nuclear material (DAPI) (Figure 7 a-a’ ), nucleolar components (Fibrillarin) 522
(Figure 7 b-b’), nuclear envelope nuclear lamina, as assessed by Lamin A immunostaining 523
(Figure 7c-c’), actin (phalloidin) (Figure 7d-d’), and plasma membrane (CellMask) (Figure 524
7e-e’) all colocalized with mCherry -labeled debris. Similarly, we examined intracellular 525
organelles, including Mitochondria, Endoplasmic Reticulum (ER), and Golgi, using 526
previously published transgenic EYFP reporters that are under the ubiquitous spaghetti 527
24
.CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseavailable under a
was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made
The copyright holder for this preprint (whichthis version posted May 7, 2026. ; https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.05.04.722804doi: bioRxiv preprint
Efferocytosis clears debris during regeneration
squash ( sqh) promoter (LaJeunesse et al. 2004) . Each of the reporters marking 528
mitochondria (Figure 7f-f”), endoplasmic reticulum (Figure g-g’), and Golgi (Figure 7h-h’) 529
colocalized with the mCherry -labelled debris. Collectively, these findings indicate that 530
persistent debris in the regenerating discs does not represent a selectively retained 531
subset of cellular components, but rather a heterogeneous mixture, suggesting no strong 532
preference in the uptake or clearance of specific debris constituents. 533
534
535
536
537
538
539
540
541
542
543
544
545
546
25
.CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseavailable under a
was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made
The copyright holder for this preprint (whichthis version posted May 7, 2026. ; https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.05.04.722804doi: bioRxiv preprint
Efferocytosis clears debris during regeneration
Discussion
547
In this study, we demonstrate that apoptotic cell debris generated during tissue ablation 548
in the wing imaginal disc is cleared in the absence of immune cell recruitment. Despite 549
robust activation of canonical damage responses, including Wnt/Wg signaling, ROS 550
production, and JNK activation, similar to those observed in damaged eye discs (Fan et 551
al. 2014; Fogarty et al. 2016; Diwanji and Bergmann 2020; Worley and Hariharan 2022), 552
the basement membrane acts as a barrier to immune cell infiltration. In contrast to the 553
eye disc, the regenerating wing disc maintains a continuous extracellular matrix that 554
physically restricts immune cell access to the epithelium. Consistent with this finding, both 555
our study and previous work (Harris et al. 2016) show that the basement membrane 556
remains intact during regeneration. This barrier function is further supported by our prior 557
transcriptional profiling of the regeneration blastema at 24 hours post -damage, which 558
revealed elevated expression of the Collagen IV gene viking (log₂FC = 5.45, p = 0.00027) 559
and reduced expression of mmp2 (log₂ FC = −1.30, p = 0.0002) (Khan et al. 2017). 560
Together, these transcriptional changes favor basement membrane stabilization over 561
degradation. Importantly, experimental disruption of basement membrane continuity was 562
sufficient to permit immune cell infiltration, directly linking extracellular matrix integrity to 563
immune cell access during epithelial regeneration. 564
565
We further show that most apoptotic cell debris generated during tissue ablation is 566
efficiently cleared from the wing imaginal disc within two days after damage by 567
neighboring hinge epithelial cells. This process represents a form of non- professional 568
efferocytosis. Efficient clearance of apoptotic debris is critical for maintaining tissue 569
26
.CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseavailable under a
was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made
The copyright holder for this preprint (whichthis version posted May 7, 2026. ; https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.05.04.722804doi: bioRxiv preprint
Efferocytosis clears debris during regeneration
homeostasis and enabling repair, a process well characterized in mammalian systems 570
(reviewed in Mehrotra and Ravichandran 2022) and during Drosophila melanogaster 571
embryogenesis and metamorphosis (reviewed in Adell et al. 2025) . When immune cell 572
access is restricted, this function must be carried out by non- professional phagocytes. 573
Thus, the spatial confinement of apoptotic cells within an intact epithelial and basement 574
membrane architecture during wing disc regeneration likely necessitates the uptake of 575
debris by neighboring epithelial cells. Our findings establish the regenerating wing 576
imaginal disc as a model for epithelial efferocytosis, enabling future study of the 577
mechanisms involved and how some debris is left behind . While JNK signaling is a key 578
driver of regenerative responses (reviewed in Tripathi and Irvine 2022), our data indicate 579
that its activation is not confined to the regeneration blastema but also occurs in 580
surrounding epithelial cells. Notably, our results show that JNK activity is elevated in 581
undamaged hinge cells at early time points (R0), whereas at later stages (R24), it is 582
enriched in the regenerating blastema (Brock et al. 2017; Khan et al. 2017) , suggesting 583
temporally and spatially distinct activation across undamaged and regenerating cell 584
populations. This early activation in hinge cells suggests that JNK may promote 585
efferocytosis in neighboring epithelial cells, analogous to its role in tumor cell engulfment 586
in eye imaginal discs (Ohsawa et al. 2011). 587
588
Delayed or defective clearance of apoptotic debris is associated with secondary necrosis 589
and can lead to pathological outcomes, including autoimmune and chronic inflammatory 590
disorders (reviewed in Kawano and Nagata 2018; Doran et al. 2019) . Draper, the 591
Drosophila homolog of Ced-1, is a well-established receptor required for the recognition 592
27
.CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseavailable under a
was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made
The copyright holder for this preprint (whichthis version posted May 7, 2026. ; https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.05.04.722804doi: bioRxiv preprint
Efferocytosis clears debris during regeneration
and clearance of apoptotic corpses and plays critical roles in multiple developmental 593
contexts (reviewed in Melcarne et al. 2019) . In regenerating wing discs, blocking debris 594
clearance with draper mutants led to delayed removal of debris and a delayed lysosome 595
formation. Despite these defects, prolonged debris persistence in the regenerating 596
epithelium had only a limited effect on overall regeneration, as assessed by adult wing 597
size. These findings suggest that debris clearance, while actively engaged, may be 598
dispensable during regeneration. However, because draper and the ablation system are 599
located on the same chromosome, these experiments were performed in a heterozygous 600
background, and the lack of an effect on adult wing sizes may reflect the incomplete loss 601
of Draper function. Alternatively, compensatory mechanisms involving other engulfment 602
receptors, such as Croquemort, NimC4/SIMU, and integrins ( αPS3βPS/βν), which can 603
also mediate apoptotic cell clearance (reviewed in Serizier and McCall 2017; Melcarne et 604
al. 2019), may partially compensate for the reduction in Draper during regeneration. In 605
the regenerating wing disc, persistence of apoptotic debris two days after damage ha d 606
minimal impact on regeneration of the disc and resulting adult wing sizes. 607
608
Residual debris comprises a heterogeneous mixture of cellular components, with no clear 609
bias toward retaining or preferentially clearing specific subcellular structures. In most 610
systems, efferocytic receptors recognize broadly conserved “eat-me” signals on apoptotic 611
material, which may be membrane-anchored or presented via soluble bridging molecules 612
(reviewed in Ravichandran 2010) . Phosphatidylserine (PS) is the best characterized of 613
these signals and, when externalized on apoptotic cells, promotes their recognition and 614
clearance (reviewed in Moon et al. 2023) . In Drosophila, Draper similarly responds to 615
28
.CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseavailable under a
was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made
The copyright holder for this preprint (whichthis version posted May 7, 2026. ; https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.05.04.722804doi: bioRxiv preprint
Efferocytosis clears debris during regeneration
damage-associated cues and PS exposure, enabling the uptake of diverse apoptotic 616
fragments (Tung et al. 2013) . Notably, these mechanisms are generally described in 617
terms of broad recognition rather than selective targeting of specific subcellular 618
components, and there is limited evidence supporting strict discrimination between 619
organelle types. Our observations supports a model in which debris clearance is largely 620
non-selective and may be driven by general engulfment mechanisms rather than targeted 621
degradation pathways. 622
623
Together, our work redefines debris clearance during regeneration, demonstrating that 624
epithelial cells can autonomously carry out efferocytosis in the absence of immune cell 625
involvement. The wing imaginal disc has not traditionally been considered a model for 626
studying efferocytosis. Our findings now establish apoptosis -induced damage and 627
regeneration in this system as a tractable context to investigate apoptotic debris 628
clearance and epithelial efferocytosis in vivo. 629
630
Materials and methods
631
Tissue ablation 632
All experiments were performed using a protocol adapted from prior work (Smith-Bolton 633
et al. 2009). Egg lays were conducted at 25°C for 4 hours in the dark on grape juice agar 634
plates supplemented with yeast paste (defined as day 0), after which embryos were 635
incubated at 18°C. First instar larvae were collected on day 2 and transferred to Nutri-Fly 636
Bloomington food vials supplemented with yeast paste at a density of approximately 50 637
29
.CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseavailable under a
was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made
The copyright holder for this preprint (whichthis version posted May 7, 2026. ; https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.05.04.722804doi: bioRxiv preprint
Efferocytosis clears debris during regeneration
larvae per vial. To induce tissue damage, vials were transferred early on day 7 to a water 638
bath maintained at 30°C for 24 hours. Following heat treatment, vials were briefly cooled 639
in an ice-water bath for 1 minute and then returned to 18°C. Regenerating animals were 640
dissected at the indicated time points or allowed to develop to adulthood for quantification 641
of adult wing size. Undamaged control animals were maintained at 18°C and dissected 642
at the third instar crawling stage. In addition, temperature- shifted genetic controls were 643
subjected to the same 30°C heat treatment, but do not undergo ablation. 644
645
Drosophila strains 646
The fly stocks used for this study are as follows: 647
w1118 (isogenic line made in the Smith- Bolton lab) , w1118; rnGal4, UAS -rpr, 648
tubGal80ts/TM6B, tubGal80 (Smith-Bolton et al. 2009), UAS-2xEYFP (Halfon et al. 2002) 649
(RRID:BDSC_6659), HmlΔRFP (gift from K. Bruckner) (Makhijani et al. 2011) , hopTum 650
(Luo et al. 1995) (RRID:BDSC_8492), αPS4-GFP (Sarov et al. 2016) (VDRC_318086), 651
MSNF9-GFP (gift from S. Govind) (Tokusumi et al. 2009), Atilla-MiET1 GFP (Honti et al. 652
2009) (RRID:BDSC_23540), PPO1-mCherry.F6 (Tokusumi et al. 2017) 653
(RRID:BDSC_600219), lz-GFP (Kudron et al. 2018) , (RRID:BDSC_43954), srpHemo-654
3XmCherry/CyO (RRID:BDSC_78358), srpHemo-3XmCherry/TM3 655
(RRID:BDSC_78359), srpHemo-H2A.3XmCherry/TM3 (RRID:BDSC_78360), srpHemo-656
H2A.3XmCherry/CyO (RRID:BDSC_78361), srpHemo -Moe.3XmCherry 657
(RRID:BDSC_78362) , srpHemo-Moe.3XmCherry/CyO (RRID:BDSC_78363) (Gyoergy 658
et al. 2018) , vkg-GFP (Kyoto DGRC# 110626) (Morin et al. 2001) , UAS-Mmp2 659
30
.CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseavailable under a
was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made
The copyright holder for this preprint (whichthis version posted May 7, 2026. ; https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.05.04.722804doi: bioRxiv preprint
Efferocytosis clears debris during regeneration
(RRID:BDSC_58706) (Page-McCaw et al. 2003) , TRE-RFP (gift from D. Bohmann) 660
(Chatterjee and Bohmann 2012) , UAS-CHARON (gift from W. Wood) (Raymond et al. 661
2022), Df(3L)drpr[Delta5]/TM6B (Freeman et al. 2003) , (RRID:BDSC_67033), sqh-662
EYFP-Mito (RRID:BDSC_7194), sqh-EYFP-ER (RRID:BDSC_7195), sqh-EYFP-Golgi 663
(RRID:BDSC_7193) (LaJeunesse et al. 2004) , UAS-mCherry (Ni et al. 2011) 664
(RRID:BDSC_35787). 665
666
Immunofluorescence 667
Primary antibodies: Primary antibodies used were mouse anti-cut (1:150, DSHB Cat# 668
2b10, RRID: AB_528186), mouse anti-Nimrod (1:250, gift from I. Ando) (Kurucz, Márkus, 669
et al. 2007), mouse anti-AtillaL1abc (1:100, gift from I. Ando) (Kurucz, Váczi, et al. 2007), 670
mouse anti-Lozenge (1:10, DSHB, RRID: AB_528346) (Lebestky et al. 2000), mouse anti-671
Hemese (1:100) (gift from I. Ando) (Kurucz et al. 2003), mouse anti-Antennapedia (1:10, 672
DSHB Cat# 8C11, RRID: AB_528083), mouse anti-Discs large (1:100, DSHB Cat# 4F3, 673
RRID: AB_528203), mouse anti-Nubbin (1:100, DSHB Cat# 2D4, RRID:AB_2722119), 674
rabbit anti -Draper (1:500) (gift from M. Freeman) (Freeman et al. 2003), mouse anti-675
Fibrillarin (1:100; Abcam, ab4566), mouse anti-Lamin (1:100, DSHB Cat# ADL67.10, 676
RRID: AB_528336). 677
678
Secondary antibodies: Secondary antibodies used were Alexa Fluor 488, 555, 633, 647 679
(1:500; Invitrogen, A21424, A21245, A21240, A21071, A21052 and A21094). 680
31
.CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseavailable under a
was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made
The copyright holder for this preprint (whichthis version posted May 7, 2026. ; https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.05.04.722804doi: bioRxiv preprint
Efferocytosis clears debris during regeneration
Stains/Dyes: Phalloidin (1:100, Invitrogen, Thermo Fisher Scientific, R415), DAPI (1:500, 681
Thermo Fisher Scientific, D1306), LysoTracker ™ Deep Red (1:250, Invitrogen, Thermo 682
Fisher Scientific, L12492), CellMask ™ Deep Red (1:500, Invitrogen, Thermo Fisher 683
Scientific, C10046). 684
685
Immunostaining 686
Immunostaining was performed using a protocol similar to that previously described 687
(Smith-Bolton et al. 2009) Briefly, dissected larval carcasses were fixed in 4% 688
paraformaldehyde (PFA) in 1× phosphate- buffered saline (PBS) for 20 minutes at room 689
temperature in 1.5 mL microcentrifuge tubes (paraformaldehyde, 16% w/v aqueous 690
solution, methanol-free; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Cat# 043368.9M). Samples were then 691
washed three times for 10 minutes each in 0.1% Triton X-100 in PBS (0.1% PBST) on a 692
nutator at room temperature (Triton X -100; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Cat# PRH5141). 693
Larvae were incubated overnight at 4 °C in primary antibodies diluted as indicated in 0.1% 694
PBST containing 5% normal goat serum (MP Biomedicals ™, Cat# MP92939154), 695
followed by three 10-minute washes in 0.1% PBST. Secondary antibodies were used at 696
a 1:500 dilution and incubated overnight at 4 °C. After secondary antibody incubation, 697
samples were washed three times in 0.1% PBST and equilibrated in 70% glycerol in 1× 698
PBS (glycerol, molecular biology grade; Fisher BioReagents™, Cat# BP229 -1). 699
The no-wash immunostaining protocol was adapted from Zhu et al, (Zhu et al. 2025) with 700
a few additions. Following dissections, larval carcasses were fixed in 10 µL of 4% 701
paraformaldehyde (PFA) at room temperature in a 72- well microwell plate (Nunc ™ 702
32
.CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseavailable under a
was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made
The copyright holder for this preprint (whichthis version posted May 7, 2026. ; https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.05.04.722804doi: bioRxiv preprint
Efferocytosis clears debris during regeneration
MicroWell™ MiniTrays; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Cat# 438733), with three larval 703
carcasses placed per well. After a 20- minute fixation, carcasses were removed using 704
forceps, briefly dabbed on filter paper (Whatman™ 1001-110 Filter Circles, Cat# 1001-705
110) to remove excess solution, and transferred to a new well containing 10 µL of 0.1% 706
PBST. 707
Carcasses were subsequently transferred between primary (1:50) and secondary 708
antibody solutions using repeated filter -paper dabbing in place of conventional wash 709
steps. Primary and secondary antibody incubations were performed overnight, with 710
intermediate 10-minute incubations in 0.1% PBST between antibody steps. Finally, larvae 711
were equilibrated overnight in 70% glycerol in the microwell plate and mounted 712
immediately in VECTASHIELD mounting medium to prevent desiccation due to the small 713
incubation volumes. 714
715
Wing discs mounting 716
Wing imaginal discs were then dissected and mounted on glass slides (plain microscope 717
slides, Fisher Scientific, Cat# 12550A3; coverslips, 24 × 50 mm, Fisher Scientific, Cat# 718
12541042) using VECTASHIELD anti-fade mounting medium (Vector Laboratories, Cat# 719
H-1000), and the edges were sealed with Sally Hansen® Quick Dry clear nail polish. 720
To obtain orthogonal optical sections, a double-sided tape mounting method was adapted 721
from Aldaz et al. (Aldaz et al. 2010) with modifications for fixed -wing imaginal discs. In 722
this modified approach, double- sided tape was used as a spacer. Briefly, double- sided 723
tape (3M 667 Scotch® Double- Sided Tape, Cat# 34-8724-5241-1) was cut into four 19 724
33
.CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseavailable under a
was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made
The copyright holder for this preprint (whichthis version posted May 7, 2026. ; https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.05.04.722804doi: bioRxiv preprint
Efferocytosis clears debris during regeneration
mm × 2 mm rectangular strips and affixed to a glass microscope slide to make a double-725
sided tape square. Wing imaginal discs were dissected and mounted at the center of a 726
square coverslip to position the sample as close to the coverslip as possible during 727
imaging (Corning® 18 × 18 mm square #1 cover glass, Cat# 2865- 18) in 2 µL of 728
VECTASHIELD mounting medium. The coverslip was then carefully inverted and placed 729
onto the tape- affixed slide. The edges were sealed with Sally Hansen® Quick Dry nail 730
polish to secure the mount and prevent desiccation of the sample. 731
732
Larval hemocytes extraction and immunostaining 733
Hemocytes were extracted from third instar larval hemolymph using a protocol adapted 734
from Hiroyasu et al. (Hiroyasu et al. 2018) . Briefly, a single third instar larva of the 735
indicated genotype was placed in a 2 µL drop of 1× PBS on a circular coverslip 736
(Fisherbrand™ circular cover glass, 18 mm diameter, Cat# 12541005CA) within a glass 737
dissection dish. Larvae were allowed to bleed into the PBS drop for approximately 5 738
minutes, after which the larval carcass was removed. The hemolymph droplet was then 739
allowed to air-dry on the coverslip for 5 minutes. Coverslips were transferred to a 12-well 740
plate (CytoOne® 12- well plates, Cat# CC7682 -7512) and fixed by completely covering 741
the coverslip with 4% paraformaldehyde. Samples were washed three times with PBST 742
on a nutator at room temperature. Primary and secondary antibody incubations were 743
performed overnight at 4 °C on a nutator. Following antibody incubation, coverslips were 744
washed three times for 10 minutes each in PBST, mounted on glass slides with 745
VECTASHIELD mounting medium, and sealed with nail polish. 746
34
.CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseavailable under a
was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made
The copyright holder for this preprint (whichthis version posted May 7, 2026. ; https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.05.04.722804doi: bioRxiv preprint
Efferocytosis clears debris during regeneration
747
Confocal microscopy, image acquisition, and processing 748
Wing imaginal discs were imaged using a Zeiss LSM 880 or LSM 900 confocal 749
microscope. All images within a given experiment were acquired on the same microscope 750
to ensure consistency using a 20x/0.45 objective. For orthogonal YZ and XZ imaging, z-751
stacks were collected with a step size of 2 µm. Image acquisition speed was maintained 752
between 3 and 5, and all other imaging parameters, including laser power and detector 753
gain, were kept constant across experimental and control samples. 754
Orthogonal projections were generated using the Zeiss ZEN Blue software by selecting 755
the ortho view for representative slices. Image files were subsequently opened in 756
ImageJ/FIJI (Schindelin et al. 2012; Schneider et al. 2012) where maximum -intensity 757
projections (MIPs) were generated for downstream processing and figure preparation. 3D 758
reconstruction and surface rendering were performed using Imaris software (Bitplane AG, 759
Oxford Instruments, Zurich, Switzerland), excluding the peripodial epithelium from the z 760
stacks. For Nubbin pouch area quantifications, MIPs were generated, and the Nubbin-761
positive pouch was manually outlined using the Freehand Selection tool in ImageJ. The 762
enclosed area was then measured and recorded for analysis. 763
764
Cell debris volume quantification 765
To quantify the volume of cell debris labeled by UAS-EYFP, debris area and height were 766
measured from confocal image stacks. MIPs were generated from confocal z -stacks 767
using ImageJ/Fiji. Top-down XY projections were used to outline debris regions in the 768
35
.CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseavailable under a
was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made
The copyright holder for this preprint (whichthis version posted May 7, 2026. ; https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.05.04.722804doi: bioRxiv preprint
Efferocytosis clears debris during regeneration
UAS-EYFP (green) channel, and the debris area was quantified using the Measure 769
function. Debris height was determined from the same image stacks by generating 770
orthogonal YZ re- slices followed by maximum -intensity projection. Five independent 771
height measurements were obtained per sample using the Straight -Line tool in ImageJ, 772
and the average height within the debris region, as defined by the UAS-EYFP signal, was 773
used as the debris height value. At later regeneration time points, when epithelial regrowth 774
altered tissue morphology, height was measured from YZ projections, accounting for both 775
apical and basal debris relative to the epithelium. Debris volume was estimated by 776
multiplying the measured debris area by the corresponding average debris height for each 777
sample. 778
779
Hemocyte quantification 780
For quantification of hemocyte number, maximum intensity projections (MIPs) of top-781
down XY confocal images were generated. Hemocytes were manually counted either 782
across the entire wing disc (including notum, hinge, and pouch regions) or specifically 783
within the rn>EYFP-labeled cell debris in the pouch. For pouch-specific quantification, 784
the rn>EYFP-labelled cell debris was segmented, and immune cells within this domain 785
were counted separately. 786
787
Adult wing mounting and quantification 788
Adult wings were scored into approximate size categories of 0%, 25%, 50%, 75%, and 789
100% relative to a wild -type wing that did not undergo damage and regeneration as a 790
36
.CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseavailable under a
was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made
The copyright holder for this preprint (whichthis version posted May 7, 2026. ; https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.05.04.722804doi: bioRxiv preprint
Efferocytosis clears debris during regeneration
disc. Representative wings from each category were dissected and mounted on glass 791
slides using Gary’s Magic Mount. Images were obtained on an Echo Revolve R4 792
microscope and processed using ImageJ/FIJI. The mounting medium was prepared by 793
dissolving Canada balsam in methyl salicylate at a 5:4 ratio, then gently evaporating the 794
mixture on a medium -heat hot plate with slow stirring at room temperature (for up to 4 795
days) until most of the solvent had evaporated, leaving a viscous solution. The mounting 796
medium was protected from light during preparation, storage, and mounting. 797
798
Lysosome puncta quantification 799
Lysosome puncta were quantified using an image analysis pipeline adapted from a 800
previous image analysis pipeline (Gamarra et al. 2020) developed for translation site-801
specific foci detection and modified here for lysosome analysis. All image processing and 802
quantification were performed using ImageJ/Fiji. Briefly, Lysotracker confocal image 803
stacks were opened in ImageJ/Fiji and converted to grayscale. A region of interest (ROI) 804
encompassing the wing pouch and hinge was manually selected using the freehand 805
selection tool and duplicated, ensuring that all associated hyperstacks were retained. 806
Brightness and contrast were adjusted uniformly across samples to enhance visualization 807
of Lysotracker-positive puncta. A maximum-intensity projection (MIP) was generated from 808
all z-stacks. The MIP image was processed using Process - Filters - Convolve with a 5 x 809
5 kernel, with the central kernel value set to 48. A threshold was applied to the processed 810
(Image - Adjust - Threshold). Lysosome puncta were quantified using Analyze Particles, 811
with particle size restricted to 2- 15 µm² and circularity set to 1.0. Particle counts were 812
exported and plotted using GraphPad Prism. 813
37
.CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseavailable under a
was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made
The copyright holder for this preprint (whichthis version posted May 7, 2026. ; https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.05.04.722804doi: bioRxiv preprint
Efferocytosis clears debris during regeneration
814
Statistical analysis 815
All statistical analyses were performed using GraphPad Prism. Comparisons between 816
two groups were conducted using Welch’s t -test. Adult wing size distributions were 817
analyzed using a chi -square test. All graphs and plots were generated using GraphPad 818
Prism. All error bars represent the standard error of the mean (SEM). 819
820
821
822
823
824
825
826
827
828
829
830
831
38
.CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseavailable under a
was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made
The copyright holder for this preprint (whichthis version posted May 7, 2026. ; https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.05.04.722804doi: bioRxiv preprint
39
.CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseavailable under a
was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made
The copyright holder for this preprint (whichthis version posted May 7, 2026. ; https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.05.04.722804doi: bioRxiv preprint
Efferocytosis clears debris during regeneration
Figure 1. Tissue Damage and Orthogonal Projections of the Wing Imaginal Disc 832
(a) Schematic representation of the genetic ablation system. (b) Schematic 833
representation of orthogonal projections of wing imaginal disc images , showing 834
morphology in the XZ projection through the pouch and the YZ projection through the 835
notum, hinge, and pouch. Purple cells are the pouch, orange cells are the hinge, yellow 836
cells are the remainder of the disc proper. Yellow arrow head: Notum-Hinge fold (N -H); 837
Orange arrowhead: Hinge-Hinge fold (H-H); Purple arrowhead: Hinge-Pouch fold (H-P). 838
(c) Phalloidin staining showing actin in the XZ projection of an undamaged wing disc 839
through the pouch. (d) Phalloidin staining showing actin in the YZ projection of an 840
undamaged wing disc through the notum, hinge, and pouch. Yellow arrow head: Notum-841
Hinge fold (N-H); Orange arrowhead: Hinge-Hinge fold (H-H); Purple arrowhead: Hinge-842
Pouch fold (H-P). Scale bars: 50 µm. 843
844
845
846
847
848
849
850
851
40
.CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseavailable under a
was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made
The copyright holder for this preprint (whichthis version posted May 7, 2026. ; https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.05.04.722804doi: bioRxiv preprint
41
.CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseavailable under a
was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made
The copyright holder for this preprint (whichthis version posted May 7, 2026. ; https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.05.04.722804doi: bioRxiv preprint
Efferocytosis clears debris during regeneration
Figure 2. Cellular debris localization and clearance during wing disc regeneration 852
(a-a″) Orthogonal YZ projection of undamaged wing imaginal disc expressing rn-GAL4 > 853
UAS-EYFP (rn>EYFP). rn>EYFP expression marks the pouch and adult muscle 854
precursor cells in the notum (blue arrow heads, a and a’’). Nuclei are labeled with DAPI 855
(a′-a″). For all panels, Yellow arrowhead: Notum-Hinge fold (N -H); Orange arrow head: 856
Hinge-Hinge fold (H-H); Purple arrowhead: Hinge-Pouch fold (H-P). (b-b″) Orthogonal YZ 857
projection of R0 wing disc expressing rn >EYFP (b,b’’) with DAPI staining (b′ -b″). Apical 858
debris is indicated by white arrowheads, and basal debris by blue arrowheads. (c-f) Three-859
dimensional reconstructions of R0 wing discs stained with DAPI and expressing rn>EYFP 860
to label cell debris. (c -e) Wing disc showing apical debris (white arrow head) and basal 861
debris (blue arrow head). (f) Orthogonal side view highlighting the apical and basal 862
localization of debris. (g- g″) Orthogonal YZ projection of R4 wing disc expressing 863
rn>EYFP (g,g’’) with DAPI staining (g′ -g”). (h-h″) Orthogonal YZ projection of R16 wing 864
disc expressing rn>EYFP (h,h’’) with DAPI staining (h′ -h”). Debris localized in the hinge 865
epithelium (blue dotted circle). (i-i″) Orthogonal YZ projection of R24 wing disc expressing 866
rn>EYFP (i,i’’) with DAPI staining (i′ -i”). (j-j″) Orthogonal YZ projection of R48 wing disc 867
expressing rn>EYFP (j,j’’) with DAPI staining (j′ -j”). (K) Quantification of total cell debris 868
volume across regeneration time points: R0 n = 11 discs, R4 n = 9 discs; ****P = 0.0001 869
compared to R0, R8 n = 7 discs, R10 n = 5 discs, R12 n = 8 discs, R16 n = 6 discs; **P 870
= 0.0036 compared to R4, R24 n = 10 discs, R36 n = 6 discs, and R48 n = 5 discs; **P = 871
0.0039 compared to R16. Pairwise comparisons showed no significant differences 872
between R4 and R8 ns, P = 0.6004, R4 and R10 ns, P = 0.5330, R4 and R12 ns, P = 873
42
.CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseavailable under a
was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made
The copyright holder for this preprint (whichthis version posted May 7, 2026. ; https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.05.04.722804doi: bioRxiv preprint
Efferocytosis clears debris during regeneration
0.3507, R16 and R24 ns, P = 0.5961 or R16 and R36 ns, P = 0.3727. Statistical 874
significance was determined using Welch’s t-test. Error bars: SEM. Scale bars: 50 µm. 875
876
877
878
879
880
881
882
883
884
885
886
887
888
889
890
891
43
.CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseavailable under a
was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made
The copyright holder for this preprint (whichthis version posted May 7, 2026. ; https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.05.04.722804doi: bioRxiv preprint
44
.CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseavailable under a
was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made
The copyright holder for this preprint (whichthis version posted May 7, 2026. ; https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.05.04.722804doi: bioRxiv preprint
Efferocytosis clears debris during regeneration
Figure 3. Immune cell recruitment is not detected under no-wash conditions in the 892
regenerating wing disc 893
(a-d) Anti -Nimrod (NimC) (yellow arrowheads) and DAPI staining under no -wash 894
conditions of an undamaged wing disc at 0 hours (a-a’), a regenerating disc at R0 (b-b′), 895
an undamaged disc at 24 hours (c-c′), and a regenerating disc at R24 (d-d′). (e) 896
Quantification of NimC-positive plasmatocytes within the wing disc pouch under no-wash 897
conditions. Undamaged discs at 0 hours n=13 discs, regenerating discs at R0 n=18 discs, 898
ns, p=0.9158, undamaged discs at 24 hours n=7 discs, and regenerating discs at R24 899
n=14 discs, ns, p=0.7614. (f -h) Orthogonal YZ projections of discs stained with anti-900
Nimrod (NimC) to mark plasmatocytes, rn>EYFP to mark cell debris, and DAPI staining 901
to mark nuclei. (f) Undamaged disc at 0 hours. (g) Damaged discs at R0 ( h). Damaged 902
discs at R24. Yellow arrow heads indicate NimC- positive plasmatocytes. Statistical 903
significance was determined using Welch’s t-test. Error bars: SEM. Scale bars: 50 µm. 904
905
906
907
908
909
910
911
45
.CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseavailable under a
was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made
The copyright holder for this preprint (whichthis version posted May 7, 2026. ; https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.05.04.722804doi: bioRxiv preprint
46
.CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseavailable under a
was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made
The copyright holder for this preprint (whichthis version posted May 7, 2026. ; https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.05.04.722804doi: bioRxiv preprint
Efferocytosis clears debris during regeneration
Figure 4 . Basement membrane remains intact and restricts immune cell 912
recruitment 913
(a-c’) Orthogonal YZ projections of wing disc expressing Vkg- GFP and co- stained with 914
NimC and DAPI in control undamaged (w¹¹¹⁸) (a-a’), control regenerating R0 disc (b-b’), 915
and rn-GAL4 > UAS-mmp2 (rn>mmp2) (c-c′) discs. Yellow brackets indicate the wing disc 916
pouch. Blue arrow head indicates NimC-positive plasmatocytes. For all panels, y ellow 917
arrowhead: Notum-Hinge fold (N-H); Orange arrowhead: Hinge-Hinge fold (H-H); Purple 918
arrowhead: Hinge-Pouch fold (H-P). (d-f) Top-down views of undamaged control (d), R0 919
regenerating disc (e), and rn >mmp2 R0 disc (f). Undamaged control n= 23 discs, 11/23 920
discs were positive for NimC, R0 discs. w¹¹¹⁸ , n=24 discs, 8/24 discs were positive for 921
NimC, and rn>mmp2, n=8 discs, 4/8 discs were positive for NimC. Scale bars: 50 µm. 922
923
924
925
926
927
928
929
930
931
47
.CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseavailable under a
was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made
The copyright holder for this preprint (whichthis version posted May 7, 2026. ; https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.05.04.722804doi: bioRxiv preprint
48
.CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseavailable under a
was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made
The copyright holder for this preprint (whichthis version posted May 7, 2026. ; https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.05.04.722804doi: bioRxiv preprint
Efferocytosis clears debris during regeneration
Figure 5: Epithelial debris is cleared t hrough hinge-mediated efferocytosis and 932
lysosome formation 933
(a-a’’) Orthogonal YZ projection of R10 wing disc expressing rn>EYFP with DAPI staining. 934
Blue arrowheads indicate EYFP -labelled cell debris in the hinge epithelium. For all the 935
panels, yellow arrowhead: Notum-Hinge fold (N-H); Orange arrowhead: Hinge-Hinge fold, 936
purple arrow head: Hinge- Pouch fold (H -P). (b, c) Top -down single- slice views of 937
undamaged control and R0 wing discs stained with LysoTracker . Yellow dashed box - 938
higher magnification region of interest (d-e) Higher-magnification views of the R0 disc in 939
(c) (yellow dashed box) showing LysoTracker -positive puncta (d,d’,e’), anti-Discs large 940
(Dlg) to show epithelial membranes (d’) , and rn>EYFP-labeled debris (e,e’). Orange 941
arrowhead: Hinge-Hinge fold, blue arrowheads indicate lysosomes. (f) Top-down single-942
slice view of an R24 wing disc stained with LysoTracker. ( g) Quantification of lysosome 943
number (LysoTracker -positive puncta) across regeneration time points. Undamaged 944
control n=10 discs, R0 n=9 discs, ****P= 0.0001 compared to undamaged control , R24 945
n=11 discs, ****P=0.0001 compared to R0. ( h-h‴) YZ orthogonal projection of R0 disc 946
stained with LysoTracker (h,h’,h’’’), Dlg (h’), and expressing rn>EYFP to label debris (h’’). 947
The white dotted circle marks lysosomes localized to the hinge-pouch (H-P) fold. (i-i‴) YZ 948
orthogonal projection of R0 disc expressing rn>EYFP to mark the debris (i’) and TRE -949
RFP to mark JNK signaling (i’’,i’’’), and stained with LysoTracker (i,i’) and DAPI (i’’’). The 950
yellow dotted circle marks lysosomes localized in the H -P fold that are associated with 951
JNK signal activation. Error bars: SEM. Scale bars: 50 µm. 952
953
49
.CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseavailable under a
was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made
The copyright holder for this preprint (whichthis version posted May 7, 2026. ; https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.05.04.722804doi: bioRxiv preprint
50
.CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseavailable under a
was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made
The copyright holder for this preprint (whichthis version posted May 7, 2026. ; https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.05.04.722804doi: bioRxiv preprint
Efferocytosis clears debris during regeneration
Figure 6: Heterozygous draper mutants show impaired debris clearance and 954
altered lysosome dynamics 955
(a-f) Orthogonal YZ projections of rn>EYFP-expressing wing discs stained with DAPI in 956
w1118 controls (a,c,e) and draper∆5/+ mutants (b,d,f) at R0 (a-b), R24 (c-d), and R48 (e-f). 957
Yellow brackets indicate rn>EYFP-labeled cell debris. For all panels, yellow arrow head: 958
Notum-Hinge fold (N -H); Orange arrow head: Hinge -Hinge fold (H-H), and p urple 959
arrowhead: Hinge -Pouch fold (H -P). (g) Quantification of debris volume across 960
regeneration time points in w1118 controls (grey bars) and draper∆5/+ mutants (yellow bars). 961
w1118 R0 n=11 discs, w1118 R24 n=12 discs, w1118 R48 n=9 discs, draper∆5/+ R0 n=17 discs, 962
draper∆5/+ R24 n=12 discs, draper∆5/+ R48 n=10 discs. Pairwise comparisons showed 963
significant differences between control and draper∆5/+ R0 ***P= 0.0002, R24 ****P= 964
0.0001, and R48 ****P= 0.0001. No significant differences were found between draper∆5/+ 965
R0 and draper∆5/+ R24 ns, P=0.2749, and draper∆5/+ R24 and draper ∆5/+ R48 ns, 966
P=0.5491. (h-m) Orthogonal YZ projections of rn>EYFP expressing discs, co-stained with 967
LysoTracker and DAPI in w ¹¹¹⁸ controls (h,j,l) and draper∆5/+ mutants (i,k,m) at R0 (h,i), 968
R24 (j,k), and R48 (l,m). Yellow dotted circles mark lysosome-enriched regions within the 969
hinge and pouch. (n) Quantification of lysosome number (LysoTracker -positive puncta) 970
across regeneration time points in w1118 controls (grey bars) and draper∆5/+ mutant wing 971
discs (yellow bars). w 1118 R0 n=11 discs, w1118 R24 n=12 discs, w 1118 R48 n=9 discs, 972
draper∆5/+ R0 n=17 discs, draper∆5/+ R 24 n=12 discs, draper ∆5/+ R 48 n=10 discs. 973
Pairwise comparisons showed significant differences between the control and draper∆5/+ 974
at R0 ***P= 0.0003 , R24 ****P= 0.0001 , and R48 **P= 0.0090. Error bars: SEM. Scale 975
bars: 50 µm. 976
51
.CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseavailable under a
was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made
The copyright holder for this preprint (whichthis version posted May 7, 2026. ; https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.05.04.722804doi: bioRxiv preprint
52
.CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseavailable under a
was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made
The copyright holder for this preprint (whichthis version posted May 7, 2026. ; https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.05.04.722804doi: bioRxiv preprint
Efferocytosis clears debris during regeneration
Figure 7: Persistent d ebris at R48 contains mixed cellular components and 977
organelles 978
(a-h) Orthogonal YZ projections of R48 wing discs expressing rn >mCherry to label cell 979
debris. For all panels, yellow arrowhead: Notum-Hinge fold (N -H); Orange arrow head: 980
Hinge-Hinge fold (H -H); Purple arrow head: Hinge -Pouch fold (H -P). (a -a’) Discs were 981
stained with DAPI to mark DNA. 10/10 discs showed DNA in the debris. (b-b’) Discs were 982
stained with Fibrillarin to mark the nucleolus . 3/3 discs showed nucleolus material in the 983
debris. (c-c’) Discs were stained with Lamin A to mark the nuclear lamina. 3/3 discs 984
showed nuclear lamina in the debris. (d-d’) Discs were stained with phalloidin to label F-985
actin. 3/3 discs showed F-actin in the debris. (e-e’) Discs were stained with CellMask to 986
label the plasma membrane. 3/3 discs showed plasma membrane in the debris. (f-h) R48 987
discs expressing rn>mCherry to label debris were also imaged with transgenic organelle 988
markers. (f-f’) Discs were expressing sqh -EYFP-Mito to label mitochondria. 3/3 discs 989
showed mitochondria in the debris. (g-g’) Discs expressed sqh -EYFP-ER to label the 990
endoplasmic reticulum (ER). 6/6 discs showed ER in the debris. (h-h’) Discs expressed 991
sqh-EYFP-Golgi to label the Golgi apparatus . 10/10 discs showed Golgi in the debris . 992
Blue arrowheads indicate regions of overlap between rn>mCherry-labeled cell debris and 993
the indicated cellular components or organelle markers. Scale bars: 50 µm. 994
995
996
997
998
53
.CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseavailable under a
was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made
The copyright holder for this preprint (whichthis version posted May 7, 2026. ; https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.05.04.722804doi: bioRxiv preprint
54
.CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseavailable under a
was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made
The copyright holder for this preprint (whichthis version posted May 7, 2026. ; https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.05.04.722804doi: bioRxiv preprint
Efferocytosis clears debris during regeneration
Supplementary Figure S1. Temporal dynamics of d ebris clearance in the 999
regenerating wing disc 1000
(a–a***) Orthogonal YZ projections of an undamaged wing disc expressing rn >EYFP (a, 1001
a*, a***), co -stained with DAPI (a′, a**, a***) and anti -Cut antibody (a″–a***). Light blue 1002
arrowheads indicate the adult muscle precursor cells in the notum. (b-e) For all panels, 1003
yellow arrowhead: Notum–Hinge fold (N– H); Orange arrow head: Hinge–Hinge fold (H–1004
H); Purple arrow head: Hinge –Pouch fold (H –P). (b –e) Orthogonal YZ projections of 1005
regenerating discs at R8 (b-b”), R10 (c-c”), R12 (d-d”), and R36 (e-e”), with GFP labeling 1006
cell debris (b-e, and b”-e”) and DAPI marking the nuclei (b’-e’, and b”-e”) (f) Quantification 1007
of total debris area across regeneration time points. R0 n=10 discs, R4 n=9 discs, **P= 1008
0.0031 compared to R0, R8 n=7 discs, R10 n=10 discs, R12 n=8 discs, R16 n=6 discs, 1009
ns P=0.0696 compared to R4 , R24 n=10 discs, * P=0.0241 compared to R4, R36 n=5 1010
discs, R48 n=4 discs, ** P=0.0069 compared to R24. (g) Quantification of debris height 1011
across regeneration time points, with the same n as in (f). R0-R4 (****P<0.0001), R4-R16 1012
(*P=0.0204). Statistical significance was determined using Welch’s t-test. Scale bars: 50 1013
µm. Error bars: SEM. 1014
1015
1016
1017
1018
1019
55
.CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseavailable under a
was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made
The copyright holder for this preprint (whichthis version posted May 7, 2026. ; https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.05.04.722804doi: bioRxiv preprint
56
.CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseavailable under a
was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made
The copyright holder for this preprint (whichthis version posted May 7, 2026. ; https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.05.04.722804doi: bioRxiv preprint
Efferocytosis clears debris during regeneration
Supplementary Figure S2. Plasmatocytes are not recruited to the regenerating wing 1020
disc epithelium. 1021
(a-c′) Wing discs from larvae expressing Hml Δ-RFP co -stained with DAPI . (a-a′) 1022
Undamaged control. (b-b′) R0 disc. (c-c′) R24 disc. Yellow arrowheads indicate Hml-RFP-1023
positive plasmatocytes. (d) Quantification of Hml Δ-RFP-positive plasmatocytes 1024
throughout the whole wing disc. No damage 0 hours n=7 discs, R0 n=13 discs , 1025
*P=0.0231, R24 n=6 discs, ns P=0.1583 (e) Quantification of Hml Δ-RFP-positive 1026
plasmatocytes within the wing disc pouch region, same n as in (d) . No damage 0 hours-1027
R0, ns P=0.0506. No damage 0 hours -R24, ns P=0.0731. (f -h′) Wing discs co -stained 1028
with anti-Nimrod (NimC) and DAPI in undamaged controls (f -f′), at R0 (g-g′), and at R24 1029
(h-h′). Yellow arrow heads indicate NimC- positive plasmatocytes. (i) Quantification of 1030
NimC-positive plasmatocytes in the whole wing disc. No damage n=9 discs, R0 n=13 1031
discs, **** P<0.0001, R24 n=9 discs, ns P=0.5459. (j) Quantification of NimC -positive 1032
plasmatocytes within the pouch region. No damage n=9 discs compared to R0 n=13 1033
discs, ***P= 0.0002. No damage compared to R24 n=9 discs, ns P=0.1530. Statistical 1034
significance was determined using Welch’s t-test. Scale bars: 50 µm. Error bars: SEM. 1035
1036
1037
1038
1039
1040
57
.CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseavailable under a
was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made
The copyright holder for this preprint (whichthis version posted May 7, 2026. ; https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.05.04.722804doi: bioRxiv preprint
58
.CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseavailable under a
was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made
The copyright holder for this preprint (whichthis version posted May 7, 2026. ; https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.05.04.722804doi: bioRxiv preprint
Efferocytosis clears debris during regeneration
Supplementary Figure S3. Plasmatocyte quantification under wash and no- wash 1041
conditions. 1042
(a) Quantification of NimC-positive plasmatocytes in the whole wing disc under no- wash 1043
conditions. No damage 0 hours n=13 discs, R0 n=18 discs, ns P= 0.4662. Undamaged 1044
24 hours n=7 discs, and R24 n=14 discs, ns P=0.7715. (b) Quantification of NimC-positive 1045
plasmatocytes in wash and no- wash conditions within the wing disc pouch. Wash n o 1046
damage n= 9 discs, No wash no damage n=13 discs, ns P=0.0610 compared to no 1047
damage wash, wash R0 n=13 discs, no wash R0 n=18 discs, * P=0.0373 compared to 1048
wash R0, and ns P=0.9158 compared to no damage no wash. Statistical significance was 1049
determined using Welch’s t-test. Error bars: SEM. 1050
1051
1052
1053
1054
1055
1056
1057
1058
1059
1060
59
.CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseavailable under a
was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made
The copyright holder for this preprint (whichthis version posted May 7, 2026. ; https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.05.04.722804doi: bioRxiv preprint
60
.CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseavailable under a
was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made
The copyright holder for this preprint (whichthis version posted May 7, 2026. ; https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.05.04.722804doi: bioRxiv preprint
Efferocytosis clears debris during regeneration
Supplementary Figure S4. Lamellocytes are not detected in regenerating wing 1061
discs. 1062
(a–a′) Hemolymph from a n undamaged larva containing circulating hemocytes, co-1063
stained with anti-Atilla and DAPI. Yellow arrowheads indicate Atilla-positive lamellocytes. 1064
(b–d′) Wing imaginal discs co- stained with anti -Atilla and DAPI . (b–b′) Undamaged 1065
controls, 0/15 discs contained lamellocytes. (c–c′) R0, 0/11 discs contained lamellocytes. 1066
(d–d′) R24, 0/13 discs contained lamellocytes . (e –e′) Undamaged hop [Tum] larval 1067
hemolymph sample co-stained with anti-Atilla and DAPI. The yellow arrowhead indicates 1068
an Atilla-positive lamellocyte. (f–f′) Undamaged hop[Tum] wing imaginal disc co-stained with 1069
anti-Atilla and DAPI. Yellow arrowheads indicate Atilla -positive lamellocytes (g). 1070
Undamaged disc stained with anti -Atilla under no -wash conditions, 0/3 discs contained 1071
lamellocytes. (h) R0 disc stained with anti-Atilla under no-wash conditions, 0/3 wing discs 1072
contained lamellocytes. Scale bars: 50 µm. 1073
1074
1075
1076
1077
1078
1079
1080
61
.CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseavailable under a
was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made
The copyright holder for this preprint (whichthis version posted May 7, 2026. ; https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.05.04.722804doi: bioRxiv preprint
62
.CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseavailable under a
was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made
The copyright holder for this preprint (whichthis version posted May 7, 2026. ; https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.05.04.722804doi: bioRxiv preprint
Efferocytosis clears debris during regeneration
Supplementary Figure S5. Multiple lamellocyte reporters confirm the absence of 1081
lamellocytes in regenerating wing discs. 1082
(a-a″) An undamaged larval hemolymph sample containing circulating hemocytes 1083
expressing α-PS4-GFP (a′, a″), co -stained with anti -Atilla (a, a″) and DAPI (a″). Yellow 1084
arrowheads indicate lamellocytes. (b- b″) Undamaged larval hemolymph sample 1085
expressing MSNF9mo-GFP (b′, b″), co-stained with anti-Atilla (b, b″) and DAPI (b″). Yellow 1086
arrowheads indicate lamellocytes. ( c-d) Top-down images of wing discs from larvae 1087
expressing α-PS4-GFP. (c) Undamaged disc, 0/6 discs contained lamellocytes. (d) R0 1088
disc, 0/6 discs contained lamellocytes. (e-f) Top-down images of wing discs from larvae 1089
expressing MSNF9mo-GFP. (e) Undamaged disc 0/7discs contained lamellocytes. (f) R0 1090
disc, 0/6 discs contained lamellocytes. (g-i) Top-down images of wing discs from larvae 1091
expressing Atilla-MiET1GFP. (g) Undamaged disc, 0/9 discs contained lamellocytes. (h) 1092
R0 disc, 0/6 discs contained lamellocytes. (i) R24 disc, 0/5 discs contained lamellocytes. 1093
Scale bars: 50 µm. 1094
1095
1096
1097
1098
1099
1100
1101
63
.CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseavailable under a
was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made
The copyright holder for this preprint (whichthis version posted May 7, 2026. ; https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.05.04.722804doi: bioRxiv preprint
64
.CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseavailable under a
was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made
The copyright holder for this preprint (whichthis version posted May 7, 2026. ; https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.05.04.722804doi: bioRxiv preprint
Efferocytosis clears debris during regeneration
Supplementary Figure S6. Crystal cells are not enriched in regenerating wing discs. 1102
(a-b′) Wing discs from larvae expressing PPO1- mCherry.F6 stained with DAPI . (a-a′) 1103
Undamaged control disc (b-b′) R0 disc. Yellow arrowheads indicate PPO1-mCherry.F6-1104
positive crystal cells. (c) Quantification of PP O1-mCherry.F6-positive crystal cells in the 1105
whole wing disc. No damage n=10 discs, R0 n=11 discs, ns, P=0.2118 (d) Quantification 1106
of PPO1-mCherry.F6-positive crystal cells within the pouch region. No damage- R0 ns, 1107
P=0.1147 with the same n as in (c). (e-f′) Top-down images of Wing discs co-stained with 1108
anti-Lozenge (Lz) and DAPI in undamaged controls (e-e′) and at R0 (f-f′). (g-h′) Top-down 1109
images of wing discs from larvae expressing Lozenge-GFP (Lz-GFP) stained with DAPI. 1110
(g-g′) Undamaged control disc. (h-h′) R0 disc. Scale bars: 50 µm. Statistical significance 1111
was determined using Welch’s t-test. Error bars: SEM. 1112
1113
1114
1115
1116
1117
1118
1119
1120
65
.CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseavailable under a
was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made
The copyright holder for this preprint (whichthis version posted May 7, 2026. ; https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.05.04.722804doi: bioRxiv preprint
66
.CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseavailable under a
was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made
The copyright holder for this preprint (whichthis version posted May 7, 2026. ; https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.05.04.722804doi: bioRxiv preprint
Efferocytosis clears debris during regeneration
Supplementary Figure S7. Hemese- positive hemocytes are not enriched in 1121
regenerating wing discs. 1122
(a-c′) Top-down images of w ing discs co -stained with anti -Hemese (He) and DAPI in 1123
undamaged controls (a-a′), at R0 (b-b′), and at R24 (c-c′). Yellow arrowheads indicate He-1124
positive hemocytes. (d) Quantification of He- positive hemocytes in the whole wing disc: 1125
no damage, n = 10 discs, R0 n = 6 discs, ns, P = 0.5212, and R24 n = 5 discs, ns, P = 1126
0.6466. (e) Quantification of He-positive hemocytes within the pouch region: no damage 1127
vs. R0 ns, P = 0.9000 , and no damage vs. R24 ns, P = 0.3434, with same n as in (d). 1128
Scale bars: 50 µm. Statistical significance was determined using Welch’s t-test. Error bars 1129
represent SEM. 1130
1131
1132
1133
1134
1135
1136
1137
1138
1139
67
.CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseavailable under a
was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made
The copyright holder for this preprint (whichthis version posted May 7, 2026. ; https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.05.04.722804doi: bioRxiv preprint
68
.CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseavailable under a
was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made
The copyright holder for this preprint (whichthis version posted May 7, 2026. ; https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.05.04.722804doi: bioRxiv preprint
Efferocytosis clears debris during regeneration
Supplementary Figure S8. srpHemo reporters reveal columnar epithelial 1140
expression during regeneration. 1141
(a-a‴) Hemolymph from an undamaged larva containing circulating hemocytes expressing 1142
srpHemo-H2A::3XmCh (a′, a‴) and Lz -GFP (a″, a‴), co -stained with anti -Nimrod (a, a‴). 1143
The yellow arrow head indicates a Lz-GFP-positive crystal cell, orange arrow heads 1144
indicate srpHemo- H2A::3XmCh-positive hemocytes, and white arrow heads indicate 1145
NimC-positive plasmatocytes. (b- b‴) Hemolymph from an u ndamaged larva expressing 1146
srpHemo::3XmCh co-stained with anti -Atilla and DAPI. Blue arrow heads indicate Atilla-1147
positive lamellocytes co- expressing srpHemo::3XmCh. (c -f) Wing discs from larvae 1148
expressing srpHemo-H2A::3XmCh. (c) Undamaged control disc. (d) R0 disc. (e) R24 disc. 1149
(f) R48 disc. (g-g′) Wing disc from larva expressing srpHemo-H2A::3XmCh at R48 co-1150
stained with anti -Antennapedia (Antp). Yellow arrow head indicates srpHemo-1151
H2A::3XmCh-positive cells. (h-h′) YZ orthogonal projections of R48 wing discs from larvae 1152
expressing srpHemo-H2A::3XmCh to mark putative immune cells and rn>EYFP to mark 1153
the cell debris co-stained with anti-Discs large (Dlg) to mark cell membranes and DAPI. 1154
Yellow arrowheads indicate srpHemo-H2A::3XmCh-positive cells within the regenerating 1155
epithelium. (i-i″) R48 wing disc from larvae co-expressing srpHemo-moe::3XmCh to mark 1156
membranes of putative immune cells and stained with anti-Nubbin (Nub) to mark the wing 1157
pouch and DAPI. Yellow arrow head labels columnar epithelial pouch cells expressing 1158
both the srpHemo-moe::3XmCh reporter and Nubbin. Scale bars: 50 µm. 1159
1160
1161
69
.CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseavailable under a
was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made
The copyright holder for this preprint (whichthis version posted May 7, 2026. ; https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.05.04.722804doi: bioRxiv preprint
70
.CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseavailable under a
was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made
The copyright holder for this preprint (whichthis version posted May 7, 2026. ; https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.05.04.722804doi: bioRxiv preprint
Efferocytosis clears debris during regeneration
Supplementary Figure S9. Cell debris clearance is followed by lysosome formation 1162
during regeneration. 1163
For panels a- f’’, dotted yellow circles mark regions of LysoTracker staining. Yellow 1164
arrowhead: Notum-Hinge fold (N-H); Orange arrowhead: Hinge-Hinge fold (H-H); Purple 1165
arrowhead: Hinge-Pouch fold (H -P). (a-a″) YZ orthogonal projection of an undamaged 1166
wing disc co -stained with LysoTracker (a- a″) and DAPI (a″). (b- b″) YZ orthogonal 1167
projection of an R4 wing disc expressing rn>EYFP-labeled cell debris (b′, b″), co-stained 1168
with LysoTracker (b-b″) and DAPI (b″). (c-c″) YZ orthogonal projection of an R8 wing disc 1169
expressing rn>EYFP-labeled debris (c′, c″), co-stained with LysoTracker (c-c″) and DAPI 1170
(c″). (d-d″) YZ orthogonal projection of an R10 wing disc expressing rn>EYFP-labeled 1171
debris (d′, d″), co- stained with LysoTracker (d- d″) and DAPI (d″). (e- e″) YZ orthogonal 1172
projection of a n R12 wing disc expressing rn>EYFP-labeled debris (e′, e″), co- stained 1173
with LysoTracker (e-e″) and DAPI (e″). (f-f″) YZ orthogonal projection of an R24 wing disc 1174
expressing rn>EYFP-labeled debris (f′, f″), co- stained with LysoTracker (f -f″) and DAPI 1175
(f″). (g-g″) YZ orthogonal projection of an R48 wing disc expressing rn >EYFP-labeled 1176
debris (g′, g″), co-stained with LysoTracker (g-g″) and DAPI (g″). (h-h″) rnGAL4>UAS-rpr, 1177
UAS-CHARON-expressing wing imaginal disc at R0 stained with DAPI (h″), showing 1178
pHlorina (h-h″) and pH-CaspGFP (h′, h″) signals. 10/17 discs were positive for phlorina 1179
signal in the hinge and pouch region. Dotted yellow circles mark regions of pHlorina 1180
expression. Scale bars: 50 µm. 1181
1182
1183
71
.CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseavailable under a
was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made
The copyright holder for this preprint (whichthis version posted May 7, 2026. ; https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.05.04.722804doi: bioRxiv preprint
72
.CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseavailable under a
was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made
The copyright holder for this preprint (whichthis version posted May 7, 2026. ; https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.05.04.722804doi: bioRxiv preprint
Efferocytosis clears debris during regeneration
Supplementary Figure S10. Heterozygous draper mutants show increased debris 1184
retention and delayed lysosome dynamics during regeneration. 1185
(a-b) Undamaged w 1118 (a) and draper Δ5/+ (b) wing discs stained with anti -Draper. (c) 1186
Quantification of total Draper fluorescence intensity in w 1118 and draperΔ5/+ wing discs. 1187
w1118 n=9, and draperΔ5/+ n=6, *P=0.0259. (d) Quantification of total debris area in w 1118 1188
(grey bars) and draperΔ5/+ (yellow bars) wing discs across regeneration time points. w1118 1189
R0 n=11 discs, draperΔ5/+ R0 n=17 discs, **P=0.0014, w1118 R24 n=12 discs, draperΔ5/+ 1190
R24 n=12 discs,****P<0.0001, draperΔ5/+ R0 and draperΔ5/+ R24 ns, P=0.0537, w1118 R48 1191
n=9 discs, draperΔ5/+ R48 n=10 discs, ****P<0.0001, and draperΔ5/+ R24 and draperΔ5/+ 1192
R48 ns, P=0.0718. (e) Quantification of debris height in w1118 (grey bars) and draperΔ5/+ 1193
(yellow bars) wing discs across regeneration time points. w1118 R0 n=11, and draperΔ5/+ 1194
R0 n=17 discs, ns, P=0.6836, w 1118 R24 n=12 discs, and draperΔ5/+ R24 n=12 discs , 1195
**P=0.0031, w1118 R48 n=9 discs, and draperΔ5/+ R48 n=10 discs, ****P<0.0001. Pairwise 1196
comparisons were not significant between draper Δ5/+ R0 and draper Δ5/+ R24, ns, 1197
P=0.9222, and draperΔ5/+ R24 compared to R48, ns, P=0.4409. (f-k) w1118 and draperΔ5/+ 1198
wing discs stained with LysoTracker at R0 (f, g), R24 (h, i), and R48 (j, k). Yellow dotted 1199
circles indicate lysosome-positive regions. Notum-Hinge fold (N-H), Hinge-Hinge fold (H-1200
H), and Hinge- Pouch fold (H -P) are marked in (f). Scale bars: 50 µm. Statistical 1201
significance was determined using Welch’s t-test. Error bars represent SEM. 1202
1203
1204
1205
73
.CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseavailable under a
was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made
The copyright holder for this preprint (whichthis version posted May 7, 2026. ; https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.05.04.722804doi: bioRxiv preprint
74
.CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseavailable under a
was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made
The copyright holder for this preprint (whichthis version posted May 7, 2026. ; https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.05.04.722804doi: bioRxiv preprint
Efferocytosis clears debris during regeneration
Supplementary Figure S11. Heterozygous draper mutants impair overall 1206
regeneration 1207
(a-c) R48 wing discs stained with anti-Nubbin to mark the regenerating pouch in w1118 (a) 1208
and draperΔ5/+ (b) discs. ( c) Quantification of total Nubbin- positive pouch area in R48 1209
w1118 wing discs, n=11 discs, and draperΔ5/+ wing discs, n=14 discs, ns, P=0.0642). Dotted 1210
yellow circles indicate the Nubbin area. Statistical significance was determined using 1211
Welch’s t-test. (d) Quantification of adult wing size following disc regeneration in w1118 and 1212
draperΔ5/+ mutants. w1118 n=302 wings, draperΔ5/+ n=986 wings, *P=0.0142. Statistical 1213
significance was determined using chi- square test. Scale bars: 50 µm. Error bars 1214
represent SEM. 1215
1216
1217
1218
1219
1220
1221
1222
1223
1224
1225
75
.CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseavailable under a
was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made
The copyright holder for this preprint (whichthis version posted May 7, 2026. ; https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.05.04.722804doi: bioRxiv preprint
Efferocytosis clears debris during regeneration
Acknowledgments: We thank Dr. Anish Bose, Dr. Felicity Hsu, Connor Powers, 1226
Nicholas Magdadaro, Devan Bianchini, Akash Patel, and Shrunali Amin for critical reading 1227
of the manuscript. We thank Dr. Katja Brückner, Dr. Shubha Govind, Dr. Dirk Bohmann, 1228
Dr. Will Wood, Dr. Marc Freeman, and Dr. Istvan Andó for providing reagents. We 1229
acknowledge the Bloomington Drosophila Stock Center (NIH P40OD018537), the 1230
Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank (NICHD, The University of Iowa) , the Kyoto 1231
Stock Center, and FlyBase for fly stocks, reagents, and database resources . We also 1232
thank Dr. Glenn Fried, Dr. Austin Cybersmith, Dr. Kingsley Boateng, Dr. Duncan Nall, and 1233
Dr. Umnia Doha of the Core Facilities at the Carl R. Woese Institute for Genomic Biology 1234
for assistance with microscopy and image analysis. 1235
1236
Funding: This work was supported by the National Institutes of Health (R01GM107140 1237
and R35GM141741 to R.K.S.-B.) 1238
1239
Data and Resource availability: Raw data will be posted to the Illinois Databank (a URL 1240
will be generated upon acceptance). All other relevant resources and data can be found 1241
within this article and its supplementary information. 1242
1243
1244
1245
1246
76
.CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseavailable under a
was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made
The copyright holder for this preprint (whichthis version posted May 7, 2026. ; https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.05.04.722804doi: bioRxiv preprint
Efferocytosis clears debris during regeneration
References
1247
Adell T, Cebrià F, Abril JF, Araújo SJ, Corominas M, Morey M, Serras F, González-Estévez 1248
C. 2025. Cell death in regeneration and cell turnover: Lessons from planarians and 1249
Drosophila. Semin Cell Dev Biol. 169. doi:10.1016/j.semcdb.2025.103605. [accessed 1250
2026 Apr 30]. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40139139/. 1251
Aldaz S, Escudero LM, Freeman M. 2010. Live imaging of Drosophila imaginal disc 1252
development. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 107(32):14217– 14222. 1253
doi:10.1073/PNAS.1008623107;WGROUP:STRING:PUBLICATION. [accessed 2026 1254
Apr 30]. /doi/pdf/10.1073/pnas.1008623107?download=true. 1255
Awasaki T, Ito K. 2004. Engulfing Action of Glial Cells Is Required for Programmed Axon 1256
Pruning during Drosophila Metamorphosis. Current Biology. 14(8):668– 677. 1257
doi:10.1016/J.CUB.2004.04.001. [accessed 2026 Apr 30]. 1258
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960982204002544?via%3Dihub. 1259
Bergantiños C, Corominas M, Serras F. 2010. Cell death- induced regeneration in wing 1260
imaginal discs requires JNK signalling. Development. 137(7):1169 –1179. 1261
doi:10.1242/DEV.045559. [accessed 2026 Apr 29]. 1262
https://dx.doi.org/10.1242/dev.045559. 1263
Bosch M, Serras F, Martín -Blanco E, Baguñà J. 2005. JNK signaling pathway required 1264
for wound healing in regenerating Drosophila wing imaginal discs. Dev Biol. 280(1):73 –1265
86. doi:10.1016/J.YDBIO.2005.01.002. [accessed 2026 Apr 30]. 1266
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0012160605000035?via%3Dihub. 1267
Brock AR, Seto M, Smith-Bolton RK. 2017. Cap-n-Collar promotes tissue regeneration by 1268
regulating ROS and JNK signaling in the drosophila melanogaster wing imaginal disc. 1269
Genetics. 206(3):1505– 1520. doi:10.1534/GENETICS.116.196832/ -/DC1. [accessed 1270
2026 Apr 30]. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5500147/. 1271
Chatterjee N, Bohmann D. 2012. A Versatile ΦC31 Based Reporter System for Measuring 1272
AP-1 and Nrf2 Signaling in Drosophila and in Tissue Culture. PLoS One. 7(4):e34063. 1273
doi:10.1371/JOURNAL.PONE.0034063. [accessed 2026 Apr 30]. 1274
https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0034063. 1275
Cuttell L, Vaughan A, Silva E, Escaron CJ, Lavine M, Van Goethem E, Eid JP, Quirin M, 1276
Franc NC. 2008. Undertaker, a Drosophila Junctophilin, Links Draper -Mediated 1277
Phagocytosis and Calcium Homeostasis. Cell. 135(3):524– 534. 1278
doi:10.1016/J.CELL.2008.08.033. [accessed 2026 Apr 30]. 1279
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0092867408011148?via%3Dihub. 1280
77
.CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseavailable under a
was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made
The copyright holder for this preprint (whichthis version posted May 7, 2026. ; https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.05.04.722804doi: bioRxiv preprint
Efferocytosis clears debris during regeneration
Diwanji N, Bergmann A. 2020. Basement membrane damage by ROS- and JNK-mediated 1281
Mmp2 activation drives macrophage recruitment to overgrown tissue. Nat Commun. 1282
11(1):3631-. doi:10.1038/S41467- 020-17399-8;TECHMETA. [accessed 2026 Apr 30]. 1283
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-020-17399-8. 1284
Doran AC, Yurdagul A, Tabas I. 2019. Efferocytosis in health and disease. Nat Rev 1285
Immunol. 20(4):254. doi:10.1038/S41577 -019-0240-6. [accessed 2026 Apr 30]. 1286
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7667664/. 1287
Elliott MR, Ravichandran KS. 2010. Clearance of apoptotic cells: implications in health 1288
and disease. Journal of Cell Biology. 189(7):1059– 1070. doi:10.1083/JCB.201004096. 1289
[accessed 2026 Apr 30]. https://dx.doi.org/10.1083/jcb.201004096. 1290
Etchegaray JI, Elguero EJ, Tran JA, Sinatra V, Feany MB, McCall K. 2016. Defective 1291
Phagocytic Corpse Processing Results in Neurodegeneration and Can Be Rescued by 1292
TORC1 Activation. Journal of Neuroscience. 36(11):3170– 3183. 1293
doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1912-15.2016. [accessed 2026 Apr 30]. 1294
https://www.jneurosci.org/content/36/11/3170. 1295
Etchegaray JI, Timmons AK, Klein AP, Pritchett TL, Welch E, Meehan TL, Li C, McCall K. 1296
2012. Draper acts through the JNK pathway to control synchronous engulfment of dying 1297
germline cells by follicular epithelial cells. Development. 139(21):4029– 4039. 1298
doi:10.1242/DEV.082776. [accessed 2026 Apr 30]. 1299
https://dx.doi.org/10.1242/dev.082776. 1300
Evans CJ, Liu T, Banerjee U. 2014. Drosophila hematopoiesis: Markers and methods for 1301
molecular genetic analysis. Methods. 68(1):242– 251. 1302
doi:10.1016/J.YMETH.2014.02.038. [accessed 2026 Apr 30]. 1303
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1046202314000930. 1304
Fan Y, Wang S, Hernandez J, Yenigun VB, Hertlein G, Fogarty CE, Lindblad JL, 1305
Bergmann A. 2014. Genetic Models of Apoptosis -Induced Proliferation Decipher 1306
Activation of JNK and Identify a Requirement of EGFR Signaling for Tissue Regenerative 1307
Responses in Drosophila. PLoS Genet. 10(1):e1004131. 1308
doi:10.1371/JOURNAL.PGEN.1004131. [accessed 2026 Apr 30]. 1309
https://journals.plos.org/plosgenetics/article?id=10.1371/journal.pgen.1004131. 1310
Fogarty CE, Diwanji N, Lindblad JL, Tare M, Amcheslavsky A, Makhijani K, Brückner K, 1311
Fan Y, Bergmann A. 2016. Extracellular Reactive Oxygen Species Drive Apoptosis -1312
Induced Proliferation via Drosophila Macrophages. Current Biology. 26(5):575– 584. 1313
doi:10.1016/J.CUB.2015.12.064. [accessed 2026 Apr 30]. 1314
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S096098221600049X?via%3Dihub. 1315
78
.CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseavailable under a
was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made
The copyright holder for this preprint (whichthis version posted May 7, 2026. ; https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.05.04.722804doi: bioRxiv preprint
Efferocytosis clears debris during regeneration
La Fortezza M, Schenk M, Cosolo A, Kolybaba A, Grass I, Classen AK. 2016. JAK/STAT 1316
signalling mediates cell survival in response to tissue stress. Development (Cambridge). 1317
143(16):2907–2919. doi:10.1242/DEV.132340/264081/AM/JAK -STAT-SIGNALLING-1318
MEDIATES-CELL-SURVIVAL-IN. [accessed 2026 Apr 30]. 1319
https://dx.doi.org/10.1242/dev.132340. 1320
Fox DT, Cohen E, Smith- Bolton R. 2020. Model systems for regeneration: Drosophila. 1321
Development (Cambridge). 147(7). doi:10.1242/DEV.173781/223043. [accessed 2026 1322
Apr 29]. https://dx.doi.org/10.1242/dev.173781. 1323
Freeman MR, Delrow J, Kim J, Johnson E, Doe CQ. 2003. Unwrapping Glial Biology: 1324
Gcm Target Genes Regulating Glial Development, Diversification, and Function. Neuron. 1325
38(4):567–580. doi:10.1016/S0896- 6273(03)00289-7. [accessed 2026 Apr 30]. 1326
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0896627303002897. 1327
Fu Y, Huang X, Zhang P, van de Leemput J, Han Z. 2020. Single- cell RNA sequencing 1328
identifies novel cell types in Drosophila blood. J Genet Genomics. 47(4):175. 1329
doi:10.1016/J.JGG.2020.02.004. [accessed 2026 Apr 30]. 1330
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7321924/. 1331
Gamarra M, Blanco- Urrejola M, Batista AFR, Imaz J, Baleriola J. 2020. Object -Based 1332
Analyses in FIJI/ImageJ to Measure Local RNA Translation Sites in Neurites in Response 1333
to Aβ1-42 Oligomers. Front Neurosci. 14:521663. doi:10.3389/FNINS.2020.00547/TEXT. 1334
[accessed 2026 Apr 30]. www.frontiersin.org. 1335
Grusche FA, Degoutin JL, Richardson HE, Harvey KF. 2011. The Salvador/Warts/Hippo 1336
pathway controls regenerative tissue growth in Drosophila melanogaster. Dev Biol. 1337
350(2):255–266. doi:10.1016/J.YDBIO.2010.11.020. [accessed 2026 Apr 30]. 1338
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S001216061001225X?via%3Dihub. 1339
Gyoergy A, Roblek M, Ratheesh A, Valoskova K, Belyaeva V, Wachner S, Matsubayashi 1340
Y, Sánchez-Sánchez BJ, Stramer B, Siekhaus DE. 2018. Tools allowing independent 1341
visualization and genetic manipulation of Drosophila melanogaster macrophages and 1342
surrounding tissues. G3: Genes, Genomes, Genetics. 8(3):845 –857. 1343
doi:10.1534/G3.117.300452/-/DC1. [accessed 2026 Apr 30]. 1344
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5844306/. 1345
Halfon MS, Gisselbrecht S, Lu J, Estrada B, Keshishian H, Michelson AM. 2002. New 1346
fluorescent protein reporters for use with the Drosophila Gal4 expression system and for 1347
vital detection of balancer chromosomes. Genesis. 34(1– 2):135–138. 1348
doi:10.1002/GENE.10136. [accessed 2026 Apr 30]. 1349
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12324968/. 1350
79
.CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseavailable under a
was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made
The copyright holder for this preprint (whichthis version posted May 7, 2026. ; https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.05.04.722804doi: bioRxiv preprint
Efferocytosis clears debris during regeneration
Han C, Song Y, Xiao H, Wang D, Franc NC, Yeh Jan L, Jan YN. 2014. Epidermal Cells 1351
Are the Primary Phagocytes in the Fragmentation and Clearance of Degenerating 1352
Dendrites in Drosophila. Neuron. 81(3):544– 560. doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2013.11.021. 1353
[accessed 2026 Apr 30]. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24412417/. 1354
Harris RE, Setiawan L, Saul J, Hariharan IK. 2016. Localized epigenetic silencing of a 1355
damage-activated WNT enhancer limits regeneration in mature Drosophila imaginal 1356
discs. Elife. 5(FEBRUARY2016). doi:10.7554/ELIFE.11588. 1357
Heron R, Amato C, Wood W, Davidson AJ. 2023. Understanding the diversity and 1358
dynamics of in vivo efferocytosis: Insights from the fly embryo. Immunol Rev. 319(1):27–1359
44. doi:10.1111/IMR.13266. [accessed 2026 Apr 30]. 1360
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37589239/. 1361
Herrera SC, Martín R, Morata G. 2013. Tissue Homeostasis in the Wing Disc of 1362
Drosophila melanogaster: Immediate Response to Massive Damage during 1363
Development. PLoS Genet. 9(4):e1003446. doi:10.1371/JOURNAL.PGEN.1003446. 1364
[accessed 2026 Apr 30]. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3636033/. 1365
Hirooka E, Hattori R, Ikawa K, Kobayashi T, Matsuyama M, Igaki T, Ohsawa S. 2025. 1366
Macrophages promote tumor growth by phagocytosis-mediated cytokine amplification in 1367
Drosophila. Current Biology. 35(13):3209- 3227.e6. doi:10.1016/J.CUB.2025.05.068. 1368
[accessed 2026 Apr 30]. 1369
https://www.cell.com/action/showFullText?pii=S0960982225006840. 1370
Hiroyasu A, DeWitt DC, Goodman AG. 2018. Extraction of Hemocytes from Drosophila 1371
melanogaster Larvae for Microbial Infection and Analysis. J Vis Exp. 2018(135):57077. 1372
doi:10.3791/57077. [accessed 2026 Apr 30]. 1373
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6101378/. 1374
Honti V, Kurucz É, Csordás G, Laurinyecz B, Márkus R, Andó I. 2009. In vivo detection of 1375
lamellocytes in Drosophila melanogaster. Immunol Lett. 126(1– 2):83–84. 1376
doi:10.1016/J.IMLET.2009.08.004. [accessed 2026 Apr 30]. 1377
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0165247809002077?via%3Dihub. 1378
Irving P, Ubeda JM, Doucet D, Troxler L, Lagueux M, Zachary D, Hoffmann JA, Hetru C, 1379
Meister M. 2005. New insights into Drosophila larval haemocyte functions through 1380
genome-wide analysis. Cell Microbiol. 7(3):335– 350. doi:10.1111/J.1462 -1381
5822.2004.00462.X. [accessed 2026 Apr 30]. /doi/pdf/10.1111/j.1462-1382
5822.2004.00462.x. 1383
Katsuyama T, Comoglio F, Seimiya M, Cabuy E, Paro R. 2015. During Drosophila disc 1384
regeneration, JAK/STAT coordinates cell proliferation with Dilp8-mediated developmental 1385
delay. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 112(18):E2327– E2336. 1386
80
.CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseavailable under a
was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made
The copyright holder for this preprint (whichthis version posted May 7, 2026. ; https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.05.04.722804doi: bioRxiv preprint
Efferocytosis clears debris during regeneration
doi:10.1073/PNAS.1423074112/-/DCSUPPLEMENTAL. [accessed 2026 Apr 30]. 1387
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4426433/. 1388
Kawano M, Nagata S. 2018. Efferocytosis and autoimmune disease. Int Immunol. 1389
30(12):551. doi:10.1093/INTIMM/DXY055. [accessed 2026 Apr 30]. 1390
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6234909/. 1391
Khan SJ, Abidi SNF, Skinner A, Tian Y , Smith- Bolton RK. 2017. The Drosophila Duox 1392
maturation factor is a key component of a positive feedback loop that sustains 1393
regeneration signaling. PLoS Genet. 13(7):e1006937. 1394
doi:10.1371/JOURNAL.PGEN.1006937. [accessed 2026 Apr 30]. 1395
https://journals.plos.org/plosgenetics/article?id=10.1371/journal.pgen.1006937. 1396
Krzemień J, Dubois L, Makki R, Meister M, Vincent A, Crozatier M. 2007. Control of blood 1397
cell homeostasis in Drosophila larvae by the posterior signalling centre. Nature 2007 1398
446:7133. 446(7133):325 –328. doi:10.1038/nature05650. [accessed 2026 Apr 30]. 1399
https://www.nature.com/articles/nature05650. 1400
Kudron MM, Victorsen A, Gevirtzman L, Hillier LW, Fisher WW, Vafeados D, Kirkey M, 1401
Hammonds AS, Gersch J, Ammouri H, et al. 2018. The ModERN Resource: Genome -1402
Wide Binding Profiles for Hundreds of Drosophila and Caenorhabditis elegans 1403
Transcription Factors. Genetics. 208(3):937 –949. doi:10.1534/GENETICS.117.300657. 1404
[accessed 2026 Apr 30]. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29284660/. 1405
Kurant E, Axelrod S, Leaman D, Gaul U. 2008. The novel engulfment receptor Six -1406
microns-under acts upstream of Draper in the glial phagocytosis of apoptotic neurons. 1407
Cell. 133(3):498. doi:10.1016/J.CELL.2008.02.052. [accessed 2026 Apr 30]. 1408
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2730188/. 1409
Kurucz É, Márkus R, Zsámboki J, Folkl-Medzihradszky K, Darula Z, Vilmos P, Udvardy A, 1410
Krausz I, Lukacsovich T, Gateff E, et al. 2007. Nimrod, a Putative Phagocytosis Receptor 1411
with EGF Repeats in Drosophila Plasmatocytes. Current Biology. 17(7):649– 654. 1412
doi:10.1016/J.CUB.2007.02.041. [accessed 2026 Apr 30]. 1413
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960982207010184?via%3Dihub. 1414
Kurucz É, Váczi B, Márkus R, Laurinyecz B, Vilmos P, Zsámboki J, Csorba K, Gateff E, 1415
Hultmark D, Andó I. 2007. Definition of Drosophila hemocyte subsets by cell-type specific 1416
antigens. Acta Biol Hung. 58 Suppl(SUPPL. 1):95– 111. 1417
doi:10.1556/ABIOL.58.2007.SUPPL.8. [accessed 2026 Apr 30]. 1418
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18297797/. 1419
Kurucz E, Zettervall CJ, Sinka R, Vilmos P, Pivarcsi A, Ekengren S, Hegedüs Z, Ando I, 1420
Hultmark D. 2003. Hemese, a hemocyte- specific transmembrane protein, affects the 1421
cellular immune response in Drosophila. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 100(5):2622– 2627. 1422
81
.CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseavailable under a
was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made
The copyright holder for this preprint (whichthis version posted May 7, 2026. ; https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.05.04.722804doi: bioRxiv preprint
Efferocytosis clears debris during regeneration
doi:10.1073/PNAS.0436940100;WEBSITE:WEBSITE:PNAS-SITE;ISSUE:ISSUE:DOI. 1423
[accessed 2026 Apr 30]. /doi/pdf/10.1073/pnas.0436940100?download=true. 1424
LaJeunesse DR, Buckner SM, Lake J, Na C, Pirt A, Fromson K. 2004. Three new 1425
Drosophila markers of intracellular membranes. Biotechniques. 36(5):784– 790. 1426
doi:10.2144/04365ST01. [accessed 2026 Apr 30]. 1427
https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.2144/04365ST01. 1428
Lan W, Liu S, Zhao L, Su Y. 2020. Regulation of Drosophila Hematopoiesis in Lymph 1429
Gland: From a Developmental Signaling Point of View. Int J Mol Sci. 21(15):5246. 1430
doi:10.3390/IJMS21155246. [accessed 2026 Apr 30]. 1431
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7432643/. 1432
Lebestky T, Chang T, Hartenstein V, Banerjee U. 2000. Specification of Drosophila 1433
hematopoietic lineage by conserved transcription factors. Science (1979). 1434
288(5463):146–149. doi:10.1126/SCIENCE.288.5463.146;SUBPAGE:STRING:FULL. 1435
[accessed 2026 Apr 30]. /doi/pdf/10.1126/science.288.5463.146?download=true. 1436
Li J, Wang S, Yuan J, Mao X, Wang X, Zhang L, Dong Q, Chen Z, Wang Y, Tang N. 2025. 1437
Tissue regeneration: Unraveling strategies for resolving pathological fibrosis. Cell Stem 1438
Cell. 32(11):1639 –1658. doi:10.1016/J.STEM.2025.10.002. [accessed 2026 Apr 29]. 1439
https://www.cell.com/action/showFullText?pii=S1934590925003704. 1440
Li W, Baker NE. 2007. Engulfment Is Required for Cell Competition. Cell. 129(6):1215–1441
1225. doi:10.1016/J.CELL.2007.03.054. [accessed 2026 Apr 30]. 1442
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0092867407005351?via%3Dihub. 1443
Luo H, Hanratty WP, Dearolf CR. 1995. An amino acid substitution in the Drosophila 1444
hopTum-l Jak kinase causes leukemia-like hematopoietic defects. EMBO J. 14(7):1412–1445
1420. doi:10.1002/J.1460- 2075.1995.TB07127.X/METRICS. [accessed 2026 Apr 30]. 1446
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1002/j.1460-2075.1995.tb07127.x. 1447
MacDonald JM, Beach MG, Porpiglia E, Sheehan AE, Watts RJ, Freeman MR. 2006. The 1448
Drosophila Cell Corpse Engulfment Receptor Draper Mediates Glial Clearance of 1449
Severed Axons. Neuron. 50(6):869– 881. doi:10.1016/J.NEURON.2006.04.028. 1450
[accessed 2026 Apr 30]. 1451
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0896627306003199. 1452
Makhijani K, Alexander B, Tanaka T, Rulifson E, Brückner K. 2011. The peripheral nervous 1453
system supports blood cell homing and survival in the Drosophila larva. Development. 1454
138(24):5379–5391. doi:10.1242/DEV.067322/ -/DC1. [accessed 2026 Apr 30]. 1455
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3222213/. 1456
82
.CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseavailable under a
was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made
The copyright holder for this preprint (whichthis version posted May 7, 2026. ; https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.05.04.722804doi: bioRxiv preprint
Efferocytosis clears debris during regeneration
Mathey-Prevot B, Perrimon N. 1998. Mammalian and Drosophila blood: JAK of all trades? 1457
Cell. 92(6):697– 700. doi:10.1016/S0092- 8674(00)81396-3. [accessed 2026 Apr 30]. 1458
https://www.cell.com/action/showFullText?pii=S0092867400813963. 1459
Meehan TL, Joudi TF, Timmons AK, Taylor JD, Habib CS, Peterson JS, Emmanuel S, 1460
Franc NC, McCall K. 2016. Components of the Engulfment Machinery Have Distinct 1461
Roles in Corpse Processing. PLoS One. 11(6):e0158217. 1462
doi:10.1371/JOURNAL.PONE.0158217. [accessed 2026 Apr 30]. 1463
https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0158217. 1464
Mehrotra P, Ravichandran KS. 2022. Drugging the efferocytosis process: concepts and 1465
opportunities. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 21(8):601. doi:10.1038/S41573- 022-00470-Y. 1466
[accessed 2026 Apr 30]. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9157040/. 1467
Melcarne C, Lemaitre B, Kurant E. 2019. Phagocytosis in Drosophila: From molecules 1468
and cellular machinery to physiology. Insect Biochem Mol Biol. 109:1 –12. 1469
doi:10.1016/J.IBMB.2019.04.002. [accessed 2026 Apr 30]. 1470
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S096517481830482X. 1471
Moon B, Yang S, Moon H, Lee J, Park D. 2023. After cell death: the molecular machinery 1472
of efferocytosis. Experimental & Molecular Medicine 2023 55:8. 55(8):1644– 1651. 1473
doi:10.1038/s12276-023-01070-5. [accessed 2026 Apr 30]. 1474
https://www.nature.com/articles/s12276-023-01070-5. 1475
Morin X, Daneman R, Zavortink M, Chia W. 2001. A protein trap strategy to detect GFP-1476
tagged proteins expressed from their endogenous loci in Drosophila. Proc Natl Acad Sci 1477
U S A. 98(26):15050 –15055. doi:10.1073/PNAS.261408198;SUBPAGE:STRING:FULL. 1478
[accessed 2026 Apr 30]. /doi/pdf/10.1073/pnas.261408198?download=true. 1479
Ni JQ, Zhou R, Czech B, Liu LP, Holderbaum L, Yang-Zhou D, Shim HS, Tao R, Handler 1480
D, Karpowicz P, et al. 2011. A genome- scale shRNA resource for transgenic RNAi in 1481
Drosophila. Nature Methods 2011 8:5. 8(5):405–407. doi:10.1038/nmeth.1592. [accessed 1482
2026 Apr 30]. https://www.nature.com/articles/nmeth.1592. 1483
Ohsawa S, Sugimura K, Takino K, Xu T, Miyawaki A, Igaki T. 2011. Elimination of 1484
Oncogenic Neighbors by JNK-Mediated Engulfment in Drosophila. Dev Cell. 20(3):315–1485
328. doi:10.1016/J.DEVCEL.2011.02.007. [accessed 2026 Apr 30]. 1486
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1534580711000761?via%3Dihub. 1487
Page-McCaw A, Ewald AJ, Werb Z. 2007. Matrix metalloproteinases and the regulation 1488
of tissue remodelling. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 8(3):221. doi:10.1038/NRM2125. [accessed 1489
2026 Apr 30]. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2760082/. 1490
Page-McCaw A, Serano J, Santé JM, Rubin GM. 2003. Drosophila Matrix 1491
Metalloproteinases Are Required for Tissue Remodeling, but Not Embryonic 1492
83
.CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseavailable under a
was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made
The copyright holder for this preprint (whichthis version posted May 7, 2026. ; https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.05.04.722804doi: bioRxiv preprint
Efferocytosis clears debris during regeneration
Development. Dev Cell. 4(1):95– 106. doi:10.1016/S1534- 5807(02)00400-8. [accessed 1493
2026 Apr 30]. 1494
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1534580702004008?via%3Dihub. 1495
Poon IKH, Lucas CD, Rossi AG, Ravichandran KS. 2014. Apoptotic cell clearance: basic 1496
biology and therapeutic potential. Nat Rev Immunol. 14(3):166. doi:10.1038/NRI3607. 1497
[accessed 2026 Apr 30]. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4040260/. 1498
Poss KD, Tanaka EM. 2024. Hallmarks of regeneration. Cell Stem Cell. 31(9):1244–1261. 1499
doi:10.1016/J.STEM.2024.07.007. [accessed 2026 Apr 29]. 1500
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1934590924002571?via%3Dihub. 1501
Ravichandran KS. 2010. Find-me and eat-me signals in apoptotic cell clearance: progress 1502
and conundrums. J Exp Med. 207(9):1807. doi:10.1084/JEM.20101157. [accessed 2026 1503
Apr 30]. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2931173/. 1504
Raymond MH, Davidson AJ, Shen Y, Tudor DR, Lucas CD, Morioka S, Perry JSA, 1505
Krapivkina J, Perrais D, Schumacher LJ, et al. 2022. Live cell tracking of macrophage 1506
efferocytosis during Drosophila embryo development in vivo. Science (1979). 1507
375(6585):1182–1187. 1508
doi:10.1126/SCIENCE.ABL4430;PAGEGROUP:STRING:PUBLICATION. [accessed 1509
2026 Apr 30]. /doi/pdf/10.1126/science.abl4430?download=true. 1510
Santabárbara-Ruiz P, López-Santillán M, Martínez-Rodríguez I, Binagui-Casas A, Pérez 1511
L, Milán M, Corominas M, Serras F. 2015. ROS -Induced JNK and p38 Signaling Is 1512
Required for Unpaired Cytokine Activation during Drosophila Regeneration. PLoS Genet. 1513
11(10):e1005595. doi:10.1371/JOURNAL.PGEN.1005595. [accessed 2026 Apr 29]. 1514
https://journals.plos.org/plosgenetics/article?id=10.1371/journal.pgen.1005595. 1515
Sarov M, Barz C, Jambor H, Hein MY, Schmied C, Suchold D, Stender B, Janosch S, 1516
Vinay Vikas KJ, Krishnan RT, et al. 2016. A genome- wide resource for the analysis of 1517
protein localisation in Drosophila. Elife. 5(FEBRUARY2016). doi:10.7554/ELIFE.12068. 1518
Schindelin J, Arganda-Carreras I, Frise E, Kaynig V, Longair M, Pietzsch T, Preibisch S, 1519
Rueden C, Saalfeld S, Schmid B, et al. 2012. Fiji: an open-source platform for biological-1520
image analysis. Nature Methods 2012 9:7. 9(7):676 –682. doi:10.1038/nmeth.2019. 1521
[accessed 2026 Apr 30]. https://www.nature.com/articles/nmeth.2019. 1522
Schneider CA, Rasband WS, Eliceiri KW. 2012. NIH Image to ImageJ: 25 years of image 1523
analysis. Nat Methods. 9(7):671 –675. doi:10.1038/NMETH.2089. [accessed 2026 Apr 1524
30]. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22930834/. 1525
Serizier SB, McCall K. 2017. Scrambled Eggs: Apoptotic Cell Clearance by Non-1526
Professional Phagocytes in the Drosophila Ovary. Front Immunol. 8(NOV):1642. 1527
84
.CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseavailable under a
was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made
The copyright holder for this preprint (whichthis version posted May 7, 2026. ; https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.05.04.722804doi: bioRxiv preprint
Efferocytosis clears debris during regeneration
doi:10.3389/FIMMU.2017.01642. [accessed 2026 Apr 30]. 1528
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5712531/. 1529
Shklover J, Levy-Adam F, Kurant E. 2015. Apoptotic Cell Clearance in Development. Curr 1530
Top Dev Biol. 114:297–334. doi:10.1016/BS.CTDB.2015.07.024. [accessed 2026 Apr 30]. 1531
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/chapter/bookseries/pii/S0070215315000605?via1532
%3Dihub. 1533
Smith-Bolton R. 2016. Drosophila Imaginal Discs as a Model of Epithelial Wound Repair 1534
and Regeneration. Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle). 5(6):251. 1535
doi:10.1089/WOUND.2014.0547. [accessed 2026 Apr 30]. 1536
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4876537/. 1537
Smith-Bolton RK, Worley MI, Kanda H, Hariharan IK. 2009. Regenerative growth in 1538
Drosophila imaginal discs is regulated by Wingless and Myc. Dev Cell. 16(6):797. 1539
doi:10.1016/J.DEVCEL.2009.04.015. [accessed 2026 Apr 29]. 1540
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2705171/. 1541
Sudarsan V, Anant S, Guptan P, Vijayraghavan K, Skaer H. 2001. Myoblast Diversification 1542
and Ectodermal Signaling in Drosophila. Dev Cell. 1(6):829– 839. doi:10.1016/S1534-1543
5807(01)00089-2. [accessed 2026 Apr 30]. 1544
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1534580701000892?via%3Dihub. 1545
Sun G, Irvine KD. 2010. Regulation of Hippo signaling by Jun kinase signaling during 1546
compensatory cell proliferation and regeneration, and in neoplastic tumors. Dev Biol. 1547
350(1):139. doi:10.1016/J.YDBIO.2010.11.036. [accessed 2026 Apr 30]. 1548
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3038240/. 1549
Tokusumi T, Sorrentino RP, Russell M, Ferrarese R, Govind S, Schulz RA. 2009. 1550
Characterization of a Lamellocyte Transcriptional Enhancer Located within the 1551
misshapen Gene of Drosophila melanogaster. PLoS One. 4(7):e6429. 1552
doi:10.1371/JOURNAL.PONE.0006429. [accessed 2026 Apr 30]. 1553
https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0006429. 1554
Tokusumi T, Tokusumi Y, Brahier MS, Lam V, Stoller-Conrad JR, Kroeger PT, Schulz RA. 1555
2017. Screening and analysis of Janelia Flylight Project enhancer-GAl4 strains identifies 1556
multiple gene enhancers active during hematopoiesis in normal and wasp- challenged 1557
Drosophila larvae. G3: Genes, Genomes, Genetics. 7(2):437– 448. 1558
doi:10.1534/G3.116.034439/-/DC1. [accessed 2026 Apr 30]. 1559
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5295592/. 1560
Tripathi BK, Irvine KD. 2022. The wing imaginal disc. Genetics. 220(4):iyac020. 1561
doi:10.1093/GENETICS/IYAC020. [accessed 2026 Apr 29]. 1562
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8982031/. 1563
85
.CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseavailable under a
was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made
The copyright holder for this preprint (whichthis version posted May 7, 2026. ; https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.05.04.722804doi: bioRxiv preprint
Efferocytosis clears debris during regeneration
Tung TT, Nagaosa K, Fujita Y, Kita A, Mori H, Okada R, Nonaka S, Nakanishi Y . 2013. 1564
Phosphatidylserine recognition and induction of apoptotic cell clearance by Drosophila 1565
engulfment receptor Draper. J Biochem. 153(5):483 –491. doi:10.1093/JB/MVT014. 1566
[accessed 2026 Apr 30]. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23420848/. 1567
Uribe-Querol E, Rosales C. 2020. Phagocytosis: Our Current Understanding of a 1568
Universal Biological Process. Front Immunol. 11:1066. doi:10.3389/FIMMU.2020.01066. 1569
[accessed 2026 Apr 30]. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7280488/. 1570
Weavers H, Evans IR, Martin P , Wood W. 2016. Corpse Engulfment Generates a 1571
Molecular Memory that Primes the Macrophage Inflammatory Response. Cell. 1572
165(7):1658–1671. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2016.04.049. [accessed 2026 Apr 30]. 1573
https://www.cell.com/action/showFullText?pii=S0092867416304949. 1574
Worley MI, Hariharan IK. 2022. Imaginal Disc Regeneration: Something Old, Something 1575
New. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 14(11):a040733. 1576
doi:10.1101/CSHPERSPECT.A040733. [accessed 2026 Apr 29]. 1577
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9620854/. 1578
Zhu Y, Wunderlich Z, Lander AD. 2025. Epithelial cell competition is promoted by signaling 1579
from immune cells. Nature Communications 2025 16:1. 16(1):3710-. doi:10.1038/s41467-1580
025-59130-5. [accessed 2026 Apr 30]. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467- 025-1581
59130-5. 1582
1583
86
.CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseavailable under a
was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made
The copyright holder for this preprint (whichthis version posted May 7, 2026. ; https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.05.04.722804doi: bioRxiv preprint
Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below.
Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure
cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can
have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy
(via DOI)
is the canonical version.